Incidence Of Postdural Puncture Headache Research Articles

The Relationship Between Age and The Incidence of Post Dural Puncture Headache in Post Sectio Caesarea Patients with Spinal Anesthesia

Background: Caesarean Section (CS) is a surgical procedure involving incisions in the abdominal wall and uterus. Spinal anesthesia is the preferred method due to the lower maternal morbidity and mortality risks compared to general anesthesia. However, the most common complication associated with spinal anesthesia is Post Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH), caused by a dural puncture. Age is a significant factor influencing PDPH occurrence. Patients aged 20-40 are at a higher risk, while those over 50 years have a reduced risk due to the decrease in cranial elasticity and pain sensitivity with age. Purpose: This study aims to assess the correlation between age and the incidence of PDPH following spinal anesthesia in CS patients. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional analytic correlation design. The sample included all CS patients who received spinal anesthesia and met the study criteria, totaling 35 respondents. Data were analyzed using univariate and bivariate analysis, with the correlation significance tested at 0.05 (2-tailed). Findings: The study revealed that 14.3% of respondents experienced PDPH, while 85.7% did not. A significant correlation was found between age and PDPH incidence, with a p-value of 0.05. The highest incidence of PDPH was observed in the 20-40 age group, decreasing notably in individuals aged 50 and above. Conclusion: This study highlights that PDPH risk is highest in patients aged 20-40 and significantly decreases in patients older than 50. Age-related changes in cranial structure and pain sensitivity likely contribute to this decreased risk.

Post-dural Puncture Headache: A Comparative Study Using 25 G Quincke's Needle in Midline and Paramedian Approaches in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section.

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become a preferred anesthetic technique for elective cesarean sections due to its rapid onset, profound sensory and motor blockade, and minimal impact on the newborn. It lowers the risk of development of thrombus in the veins and pulmonary vessels and permits early ambulation. The most popular technique used to reach the subarachnoid space is the midline technique, though it can be challenging to use in some cases, including those involving elderly patients with degenerative abnormalities in the vertebral column, patients who are unable to flex the vertebral column, noncooperative patients, and hyperestheticpatients. The paramedian technique resolves the challenges posed by the midline technique. It is also relatively easy to carry out. Based on the midline technique's inadequacies, we hypothesized that the paramedian method of SA would be less complicated than the midline approach, with a relatively low occurrence of post-dural puncture headaches (PDPH). Methodology Using the midline and paramedian approaches during cesarean surgeries, we performed an observational descriptive longitudinal study to assess the occurrence and magnitude of PDPH. During an elective cesarean delivery, the seated patient received 2.0-2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine using the midline or paramedian approaches and a 25 G Quincke's needle at the L3-L4 level. Eighty-four pregnant females with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II, aged 18 to 35 (n = 42 in each group), were included in this research. The occurrence and severity of PDPH were compared among thegroups during a period of five days. Result In comparison to the paramedian group (7.1%), the midline group had a higher incidence of PDPH (14.3%). There was a significant correlation between the technique and the occurrence of PDPH (p = 0.041). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to quantify pain five days after surgery. Pain levels in Group B (paramedian) were consistently less than those in Group A (midline). On day 1, Group B had a mean score of 0.49 ± 1.16 (p = 0.030) compared to Group A's mean VAS score of 1.27 ± 1.95. Day 5 (p = 0.032): Because this tendency persisted through day 5, the p-values for days 2, 3, 4, and 5 remained significant. These findings suggest that the midline technique is linked to a higher occurrence and magnitude of PDPHthan the paramedian approach. Conclusion Employing a paramedian technique has been associated with a noteworthy decline in the frequency of PDPH and a decrease in the need for additional analgesics, which could lead to a less severe case of PDPH. The paramedian approachneeded fewer attempts and needle passes, which leads to a lower incidence of headache, backache, and injection site pain and better patient satisfaction.

Prophylactic cosyntropin after unintentional dural puncture and incidence of post-dural puncture headache and epidural blood patch use: A retrospective cohort study (2019–2022)

BackgroundCosyntropin has been suggested to decrease the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) by increasing the production of cerebrospinal fluid. This study examined the association of prophylactic cosyntropin administration with the incidence of PDPH and its management with an epidural blood patch after an unintentional dural puncture (UDP). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of cases with UDP during placement of neuraxial labor analgesia. Per institutional practice and at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, intravenous cosyntropin 1 mg may be administered for PDPH prophylaxis. PDPH, time from UDP to cosyntropin administration, time to development of PDPH, and management with epidural blood patch(es) were recorded. ResultsCosyntropin was administered in 164 of 234 (70%) cases with UDP. PDPH occurred 98/164 (60%) with cosyntropin and 45/70 (64%) without cosyntropin (p = 0.66). The PDPH adjusted incidence was 53% with cosyntropin and 62% without cosyntropin, difference 9% (95% CI −6% to 24%, p = 0.25). The adjusted epidural blood patch rate was 66% with cosyntropin and 78% without cosyntropin, difference of 12% (95% CI −5% to 28%, p = 0.17). ConclusionsProphylactic cosyntropin following UDP was not associated with a significant decrease in PDPH rate or use of epidural blood patch for management of PDPH. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse hyperglycemic or hypertensive events amongst those who did or did not receive cosyntropin.

Does Preoperative Coffee Consumption Prevent Intraoperative Hypotension in Cesarean Section Surgeries?

In this study, we evaluated the effects of a cup of coffee given to patients before surgery in a cesarean section by means of intraoperative hypotension, ephedrine requirement, and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). A total of 140 patients undergoing elective cesarean sectionwith spinal anesthesia were included in this study. Participants who drank a single cup of filtered coffee two hours before spinal anesthesia were included in the coffee group, and those who drank water were in the control group. In each group, 70 patients were included. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded every three to five minutes after spinal anesthesia. Intraoperative use of ephedrine was recorded. The PDPH was monitored for three days. The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was 48.6% in the coffee group and 71.4% in the control group (p = 0.006). The rate of ephedrine usage (25.7%) was significantly lower in the coffee group (p = 0.001). The incidence of PDPH in the first 24 hours (2.9%) was significantly lower in the coffee group (11.4%). The visual analog scale (VAS) score was similar between groups (p = 0.048, p > 0.05). Consumption of a single cup of coffee before spinal anesthesia reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypotension and the rate of ephedrine usage in cesarean sections.

Incidence of post-dural lumbar puncture headache (PDLPH) in comparison between emergency and elective lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with 26G Quincke-Babcock cutting-beveled spinal needle.

C-section is usually performed under spinal anesthesia also known as a subarachnoid block (SAB) over general anesthesia. Because of the lesser amount of dose used, there is a lower risk of local anesthetic toxicity and minimal transfer of drugs to the fetus. Obstetric patients have a higher risk of having post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). PDPH occurs due to leakage of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the hole created by a spinal needle. There are many elements affecting the frequency of PDPH, these elements can also consist of age, female sex, needle size, and types, pregnancy, preceding records of PDPH, median-paramedian distinction in approach, a puncture level. PDPH is commonly in the form of a frontal, occipital, or retro-orbital headache that starts in 12-72 h after the dural puncture and will increase when standing and decrease when lying down or resting. We aimed to learn about headache frequency between elective and emergency lower segment cesarean section using 26-G Quincke spinal needle in full-term pregnant patients. To study the incidence of PDPH using the 26G Quincke spinal needle. To analyze the causal factors/determinants such as adequate preloading of fluids, size of spinal needle, number of pricks, and technique of lumbar puncture effects on the incidence of PDPH. This study is a prospective questionnaire-based comparative observational study using the convenience sampling method. The patients were interviewed with a structured questionnaire at the Symbiosis University Hospital and Research Centre, Lavale, Pune. The patients observed for the study were between 20 and 40 of age group, posted for emergency or elective lower segment cesarean section, with body mass index (BMI) less than 14.5 to 24.9 and with ASA I and II grades. Patients with any comorbidities, recurrent headaches, obesity, and spine deformity were excluded. According to the review of the literature and with the help of a formula, the sample size was calculated as 20; 10 patients for elective LSCS, and 10 patients for emergency LSCS. Out of 20 patients, 10 patients were posted for elective LSCS, and the rest 10 patients were for emergency LSCS under spinal anesthesia. The incidence of PDPH was found only in 2 out of 10 emergency LSCS patients, and no patients from elective LSCS cases showed up with the incidence of PDPH.

The Effect of Placement and Management of Intrathecal Catheters Following Accidental Dural Puncture on the Incidence of Postdural Puncture Headache and Severity: A Retrospective Real-World Study

(Anaesthesia. 2023;78:1256–1261) Previous studies have come to different conclusions about whether insertion of an intrathecal (IT) catheter after accidental dural puncture (ADP) during epidural anesthesia reduces complications. The most common complication is postdural puncture headache (PDPH), which can have short-term and long-term effects, including decreased breastfeeding and increased risk for postpartum depression, chronic headache, and backache. The usual treatment for PDPH is an epidural blood patch (EBP), which itself can have serious complications. Accidental dural puncture occurs in ∼0.5% to 1.0% of all epidurals. The authors of this study investigated whether IT catheter insertion was associated with a decreased risk of PDPH and a decreased need for EBP.

Incidence of postdural puncture headache following the median and para median approaches in spinal anesthesia - a randomized control study

Incidence of postdural puncture headache following the median and para median approaches in spinal anesthesia - a randomized control study

Risk Factors of Post Dural Puncture Headache in Cesarean Section Patients: A Multivariate Analysis Study

Background: The use of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) is at risk of experiencing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). This is influenced by several factors.Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of risk factors on the occurrence of PDPH in patients undergoing CS under spinal anesthesia.Methods: The study design is a nested case-control study with independent variables influencing the incidence of PDPH in CS with spinal anesthesia. Samples were taken from CS patients with spinal anesthesia at the Central Surgical Installation of Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.Result: A total of 74 patients were included in the multivariate analysis, which showed that neurological disorders with p-value = 0.069; OR= 9,306; 95% CI = 0.842-102.828 and the number of punctures with p = 0.060; OR= 4.798; 95% CI = 0.997-23.075 is the most significant risk factor for the incidence of PDPH in CS patients. There was an additive effect which indicated that mobilization of more than 6 hours mutually reinforces the occurrence of PDPH in CS patients.Conclusion: Preoperative risk factors such as a history of neurological disorders increase the incidence of PDPH in CS patients. Intraoperative risk factors in this study were total puncture and needle size, increasing the incidence of PDPH in CS patients. Post-operative risk factors, in this case, immobilization, increase the incidence of PDPH in CS patients. Preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative risk factors, together or separately, increase the incidence of PDPH in patients undergoing CS.

Effect of Patient Position during Spinal Anesthesia on the Incidence of Post-Dural Puncture Headache after Cesarean Section

Objective: To compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section between the sitting and left lateral decubitus positions. Methodology: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from May 2022 to October 2022. A total of 120 parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the sitting or left lateral decubitus position group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PDPH within 5 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects such as hypotension, nausea/vomiting, and bradycardia. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: The incidence of PDPH post-procedure was significantly higher in the sitting group compared to the left lateral decubitus group (33.3% vs. 6.7%). In the sitting position group, 63.3% of women experienced hypotension, 26.7% had bradycardia, and 30.0% reported nausea/vomiting, whereas in the left lateral decubitus group, these figures were 58.3%, 21.7%, and 23.3%, respectively. Conclusion: This study concludes that the left lateral decubitus position during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is associated with a lower incidence of PDPH compared to the sitting position.

The Effect of Spinal Needle Type on Post-Dural Puncture Headache in Spinal Anesthesia: Prospective Randomized Study.

Postdural puncture headache is a headache that occurs after a dura puncture, especially in caesarean sections, and afects patient comfort and mobilization. In this study, we compared the efects of pencil-tipped spinal needles and especially curved, bilateral atraumatic spinal needles in individuals undergoing elective caesarean sections. A total of 886 patients, aged 20-50 years, who had cesarean sections with spinal anesthesia and had American Society of Anesthesiologists II and III scores, were included in the study. The patients were allocated into 3 groups using the closed envelope randomization technique: Group 1 (n=250) received spinal insertions using 25-gauge pencil-point needles; Group 2 (n=245) received spinal insertions using 26-gauge atraumatic needles; and Group 3 (n=250) received spinal insertions using 27-gauge pencil-point needles. Records were kept of the quantity of spinal needle referrals, the type of treatment, the length of hospital stays, and complications. In the study, 745 patients who had cesarean section operations under spinal anesthesia were further analyzed. The mean incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) was 3.2% (n=24). The incidence of PDPH was higher in group 2 than in group 3 and group 1 (Group 1: 2.8%; Group 2: 6.8%; Group 3: 0%) (P <0.05). Among other complications, low back, back, shoulder, and surgical complications were similar for all 3 groups. In caesarean section operations, pencil-point spinal needles were found to have a lower incidence of postdural puncture headache than Atraucan-cut needles, regardless of needle thickness.

Management of Post-Dural Puncture Headaches in Pediatric Patients with Epidural Blood or Saline Patch: An Educational Focused Review.

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common adverse outcome following puncture of the dura. It can occur after inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement or following diagnostic or therapeutic LP. The incidence of PDPH in pediatric patients has been estimated at 1-15% depending on patient factors (age, gender, body mass index) and needle factors (size and needle bevel/point type). The larger the needle gauge, the higher the incidence of PDPH. Various options have been proposed to treat PDPH including observation, bed rest, hydration, caffeine, and epidural blood/saline patch. The current manuscript provides a review of the use of epidural blood/saline patch in pediatric-aged patients with PDPH.

Comparative evaluation of nebulised dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl for the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study.

The incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following spinal anaesthesia in the obstetric population is around 0.5%-2%. Hydration, bed rest, caffeine, paracetamol, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, epidural blood patches, etc., are the various modalities used for its management. This study aims to compare nebulised dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl for the treatment of PDPH in parturients after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Ninety obstetric patients aged 18-35 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II/III and suffering from PDPH as per the criteria of the International Headache Society after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were recruited in this double-blinded randomised study. Patients were randomised to Group D (dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg nebulisation), Group F (fentanyl 1 µg/kg nebulisation), and Group S (saline nebulisation 4mL). The nebulisation was done 12 hourly for 72 hours. Assessment parameters included pain score and the requirement of additional treatment such as paracetamol, caffeine, and epidural blood patch. Analysis of variance test was used for continuous quantitative variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for quantitative discrete data. The pain scores at 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours following nebulisation were significantly lower in Group D in comparison to groups F and S (P < 0.001). The number of patients requiring additional analgesic therapy was lower in Group D in comparison to patients in other groups (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine nebulisation resulted in effective reduction in PDPH symptoms and pain scores. Nebulisation with fentanyl did not alleviate PDPH symptoms when compared to the control group.

Comparison of the Effect of Landmark-Based Midline and Paramedian Approaches on Spinal Anesthesia-Related Complications in Adult Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background and Objectives: Spinal anesthesia is widely used in various types of surgery. However, several complications can occur afterward. This study aimed to identify differences in the incidence of anesthesia-related complications according to the approach methods (midline versus paramedian) for landmark-based spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science, for eligible randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) incidence, and secondary outcomes were low back pain (LBP) incidence and success rate in the first trial of spinal anesthesia. We estimated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. Results: In total, 2280 patients from 13 randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis. The incidence rates of PDPH were 5.9% and 10.4% in the paramedian and midline approach groups, respectively. The pooled effect size revealed that the incidence of PDPH (OR: 0.43, 95% CI [0.22-0.83]; p = 0.01; I2 = 53%) and LBP (OR: 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.44]; p < 0.001; I2 = 16%) decreased, and the success rate in the first attempt was higher (OR: 2.30, 95% CI [1.36-3.87]; p = 0.002; I2 = 35%) with the paramedian than with the midline approach. Conclusions: Paramedian spinal anesthesia reduced PDPH and LBP and increased the success rate of the first attempt.

Study to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needle in spinal anesthesia

Background: Spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly used regional anesthesia techniques. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-known iatrogenic consequence of spinal anesthetic and diagnostic lumbar puncture, primarily caused by loss of cerebral spinal fluid. To reduce complications, spinal needles have undergone modifications. The two most important modifiable risk variables for PDPH were needle shape and size. In young expecting mothers, post-cesarean sections are associated with an increased incidence of PDPH. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to compare the incidence of PDPH in obstetric patients using cutting and pencil-point spinal needles following spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This 1-year double-blind study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesia from August 2021 to July 2022. The study comprised obstetric patients who were scheduled for elective-segment cesarean section. The subarachnoid block needle was divided into Groups A and B at random: Group A 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle with a pencil point, whereas Group B 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle with a cutting bevel. Records were kept on age, height, weight, and gestational age. A follow-up was conducted up until the discharge date. The incidence and severity of PDPH after spinal anesthesia were examined in both groups. The results were analyzed with SPSS 20.0, and the Fischer exact and Chi-square tests were used to look for statistical significance. Results: The current study included 120 patients in total, 60 patients in each of Groups A and B. When a pencil point Whitacre was used, the incidence of PDPH was 2 (3.3%), however, when a cutting Quincke needle was used, the incidence was 7 (10.8%). With a P &lt; 0.05, the relationship between the two was considered statistically significant. The pain severity was mild in both patients of Group A. Of the seven patients in Group B, four had mild pain, two had moderate pain, and one had severe pain. Conclusion: The pencil-point 25-G Whitacre spinal needle has a lower incidence of PDPH than the traditional 25-G Quincke needle and was suggested for patients at risk of PDPH. In light of this, the current study suggested using pencil-point spinal needles for lumbar punctures and spinal anesthesia in obstetric patients.

Incidence and Management of Post-dural Puncture Headache among Parturients: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a known complication following spinal and epidural anesthesia. Study Design: This is a retrospective study to assess the incidence, risk factors, severity, and management of PDPH. Materials: The data were extracted from the medical records. All parturients who gave birth under spinal anesthesia or epidural analgesia were included. Maternal demographics, the size of the needle, the position of the parturient, and the day of onset of the headache were noted. Categorical variables were expressed using frequency and percentage and numerical variables as mean and standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance test was used for cross-comparison between groups. Results: A total of 35 patients developed PDPH. It was managed conservatively in 65.71%, with Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) in 28.57% and by epidural blood patch (EBP) in 5.72%. The mean age was 28.6 years and body mass index was 27.2. 25G spinal needle was used in 54.3% and 23G in 28.6%. At 30 minute, pain score was &lt;4 in SPGB and EBP. At 2 hours, pain score was &lt;4 in all patients. The difference in the drop in pain score was statistically significant with a P value of &lt; .002 at all time points. On cross-comparison, conservative management with SPGB and blood patch was statistically significant. Conclusion: The incidence of PDPH was 0.8%. We can continue with the 23G and 25G Whitacre needles due to the incidence of PDPH being lower. The use of SPGB and EBP is effective in management of severe PDPH.

Spplaash Study: A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Incidence of Postdural Puncture Headache with the Use of Atraumatic Needles in Hematology

Introduction - Postdural-puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common complication after lumbar puncture, probably due to leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the dural defect into the epidural space. Most cases of PDPH occur within 8 days of a lumbar puncture and may be associated with other symptoms, such as photophobia, nausea or neurological complications. In this context, PDPH is a debilitating condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While several risk factors have been proposed to participate in PDPH etiology, no preventive or therapeutic measures have robustly proven their efficacity . Among PDPH-related risk factors, needle tip shape has been shown to influence the incidence of PDPH, especially in the context of diagnostic LP. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of PDPH using conventional (cutting-type) or atraumatic (pencil-point) spinal needles in hematological patients. Methods -This was a randomized, double-blind study of 68 adult patients scheduled for a diagnostic and/or therapeutic lumbar puncture (LP) (SPPLAASH study, NCT03126045). Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one of two needles : 22-gauge cutting (n=36) and 26-gauge atraumatic (n=32). LP and CSF collection were performed in accordance with standardized procedures. The main outcome was the occurrence of severe headache (≥4 out of 10 on the numerical rating scale (NRS)) as measured by interviews for 8 days after LP, repeated until headache resolution. Secondary outcomes included maximum intensity and duration of PDPH as well as procedural failure. Results - The median age at the time of LP was 60 years (Q1-Q3, 46-70) and 40% of patients were women. Demographic and procedural characteristics are summarized in Table 1. No significant difference was statistically observed between the two treatment groups, except for LP indication. The overall rate of severe PDPH was 19.7% (95% CI - 10.9-31.3). Interestingly, the incidence of severe PDPH was statistically reduced from 31.3% (95% CI - 16.9-49.3) in the conventional needle group to 6.5% (95% CI - 0.8-21.4) in the atraumatic group (p=0.011). High body mass index (OR 0.72, 95% - CI 0.57-0.91) and male sex (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-1) were factors associated with a lower risk of PDPH. Means of maximum intensity of PDHP at 8 days were estimated to be 2.3 (sd 3.1) in the conventional needle group and 0.7 (sd 1.31) in the atraumatic group, with a statistically difference when considering median intensities (p=0.032) and number of days with NRS ≥4 (p=0.030). We used Sankey flow diagram to map the trajectories of PDPH intensities during the 8-day follow-up (Figure 1). First attempt LP success, failure rate, mean number of attempts, and the frequency of analgesic prescritions did not statistically differ between the two needle groups. Conclusion - Lumbar puncture is an essential and common procedure in hematologic clinical care and research. Our data indicate that atraumatic needles were associated with a decrease in the incidence of severe PDPH as well as in the duration of PDPH event. Moreover, the use of atraumatic needle was safe and feasible. Given that PDPH has a major impact on quality-of-life already altered by hematological treatments, and that headache might be caused by a differential diagnosis (e.g. cerebral sinus venous thrombosis due to Asparaginase in acute lymphoblastic leukemia), the use of atraumatic needles should be encouraged in this population, which often benefits from multiple LP.

Factors Predisposing to Postdural Puncture Headache after Spinal Anaesthesia among Elective Caesarean Section Patients at Thika Level 5 Hospital, Kenya

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section (CS). There is little data on the incidence and its predisposing factors in low-income countries. The study aimed to investigate the incidence and factors predisposing patients to PDPH after a dural puncture during a planned Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia at Thika Level 5 Hospital, Kenya.&#x0D; Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. Pregnant women scheduled for planned Caesarean sections under spinal anaesthesia at Thika Level 5 Hospital were randomly recruited. Data was collected during the fourth quarter of 2021. Patient factors (age, BMI, bed rest, and previous history of PDPH), healthcare provider factors (qualification, experience, and the number of dural punctures), and equipment factors (size, design, and spinal needle orientation) were evaluated to determine predisposing factors for PDPH. Sample size obtained by the use of Fisher’s formula, resulting in a sample size of 103.&#x0D; Results: We found the incidence of PDPH at Thika Level 5 Hospital to be 24.5%. Patient and equipment factors were found to be associated with PDPH. Among the patient factors, high BMI was found to be significant (p = 0.039) while among the equipment factors, traumatic needle tip design (p = 0.049) and the perpendicular orientation of needle bevel (p = 0.022) were found to be associated with PDPH.&#x0D; Conclusion and Recommendations: We conclude that PDPH is a common complication following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section, and the incidence (24.5%) is relatively high at Thika Level 5 Hospital. High BMI, traumatic cutting spinal needle tip design and perpendicular orientation of the needle bevel are predisposing factors. Further research is needed to determine the predisposing factors of PDPH at different levels of hospitals in Kiambu County, and understand the specific mechanisms and measures to minimize the incidence PDPH

Prophylactic Intravenous Injection of Neostigmine with Atropine versus Ondansetron on Post-dural Puncture Headache Incidence and Severity among Elective Cesarean Section Cases

Prophylactic Intravenous Injection of Neostigmine with Atropine versus Ondansetron on Post-dural Puncture Headache Incidence and Severity among Elective Cesarean Section Cases

Incidence and Severity of Post-dural Puncture Headache in Non-obstetric Patients Undergoing Subarachnoid Block.

Background and goal of the study Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a complication of central neuraxial block, either subarachnoid block (SAB) or epidural block. This clinical entity has a wide incidence and is affected by factors such as age, gender, needle gauge, needle shape/type, number of puncture attempts, and previous history of headache. Due to the lack of data in the non-obstetric population, this study assesses the incidence and severity of PDPH after SAB. Materials and methods A prospective observational study was carried out on patients undergoing SAB during the last trimester of 2020. Data were recorded on the day of surgery, 48 hours, and seven days after surgery. Data collected included demographic and medical clinic information, SAB procedure details, and clinical outcomes related to the presence of PDPH. Results and discussion Overall, 143 patients were included (median age: 62 years;53.1% were women (n=76)). Most patients were aged >60 years (55.9%; n=80) and ASA 2 classification (65.0%; n=93). The incidence of PDPH was 21.7% (n=31), and most cases were from inpatient surgery (58.3%, n=21). The incidence of PDPH was 2.5 times higher with the use of 25 gauge compared to the use of the 27 gauge needle and was more prevalent with the use of the Quincke needles. Conclusion Over 20% of patients undergoing SAB experienced PDPH. Previous history of headache, larger gauge, and the Quincke needle use were associated with a higher incidence of PDPH.

Incidence and associated factors of post-dural puncture headache among orthopaedic patients after spinal anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of a complication of spinal anaesthesia, influenced mostly by various factors including the patient's age, spinal needle size and design and sex. This headache can be severe and debilitating, preventing ambulation and limiting daily living activities. This study assessed the incidence and associated factors of PDPH among patients who received spinal anaesthesia for orthopaedic procedures at the Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from June to August 2022. Prospective cohort study design was employed using Consecutive sampling method among patients who received spinal anaesthesia for orthopaedics procedure at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from June to August 2022. Data were collected by face to face interview and direct observation based on questionnaire. The data were entered to epidata 4.6 and analyzed by SPSS version 20 software. A total 95 patients aged 16-75 was participated in study. Those independent variable that were significant on binary logistic regression at P less than 0.2, were analyzed on multivariate regression, and considered significant association with PDPH at P value less than 0.05. Ninety-five study participants were included in our study of which 19 (20%) had developed PDPH. Among patients who develop PDPH; 9.5% of the patients reported moderate pain while 10.5% experience mild PDPH and 80% of patient has no pain. The BMI and age were found to have significant association with PDPH [(P value 0.018, adjusted odds ratio 8.738, 95% CI, 1.461-52.269) and (P value 0.011, adjusted odds ratio 12.146, 95% CI, 1.753-84.170)], respectively) to PDPH. The incidence of PDPH was found to be higher in Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. The hospital management and the anaesthetists should minimize the magnitude of by strictly following different preventive strategies.