Incidence Of Major Bleeding Research Articles

Impact of direct oral anticoagulant concentration on clinical outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation.

A real-world association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentration and clinical outcomes among Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is reported herein. Patients with AF aged ≥20 years who used DOAC for ≥3 days were enrolled. Trough and peak DOAC concentrations were measured and compared to the expected range reported in clinical trials. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to investigate the association between concentration and outcomes. From January 2016 to July 2022, a total of 859 patients were enrolled. Among them, 22.5%, 24.7%, 36.4%, and 16.4% were on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. Compared to clinical trials, the proportion of DOAC concentrations higher or lower than the expected range were 9.0% and 14.6% for trough, respectively, and 20.9% and 12.1% for peak, respectively. The average follow-up duration was 2.4±1.6 years. The incidence of stroke and systemic thromboembolism (SSE) was 1.31 per 100-person years, and low trough concentration predicted SSE (hazard ratio [HR]=2.78 [1.20, 6.46]). The incidence of major bleeding was 1.64 per 100-person years, and high trough was associated with major bleeding (HR=2.63 [1.09, 6.39]). The association between peak concentration and SSE or major bleeding was non-significant. Off label under dosing (odds ratio [OR]=2.69 [1.70, 4.26]), once daily DOAC dosing (OR=3.22 [2.07, 5.01]), and high creatinine clearance (OR=1.02 [1.01, 1.03]) caused low trough concentration. Contrarily, congestive heart failure was significantly associated with high trough concentration (OR=1.71 [1.01, 2.92]). In conclusion, trough DOAC concentration measurements should be considered among patients at risk of out-of-expected range DOAC concentrations.

Incidence of Mid-Term Prognostic Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome During the Late 2010s in 2 Tertiary Hospitals in a Rural Area of Japan - A Temporal Comparison.

Background: Data on the incidence of mid-term prognostic events in patients who developed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the late 2010s are scarce. Methods and Results: We retrospectively included and collected data for 889 patients with ACS (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]/non-ST-elevation ACS [NSTE-ACS]) discharged alive from 2 tertiary hospitals in Izumo City, in rural Japan, between August 2009 and July 2018. Patients were divided into 3 time groups (T1: August 2009-July 2012; T2: August 2012-July 2015; T3: August 2015-July 2018). The cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; comprising all-cause death, recurrent ACS, and stroke), major bleeding, and heart failure hospitalization within 2 years of discharge was compared among the 3 groups. The incidence of freedom from MACE was significantly higher in the T3 group than in the T1 and T2 groups (93 [95% confidence interval {CI} 90-96%] vs. 86% [95% CI 83-90] and 89% [95% CI 90-96], respectively; P=0.03). There was a tendency for a higher incidence of STEMI among patients in T3 (P=0.057). The incidence of NSTE-ACS was comparable among the 3 groups (P=0.31), as was the incidence of major bleeding and hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: The incidence of mid-term MACE in patients who developed ACS during the late 2010 s (2015-2018) was lower than that in prior periods (2009-2015).

The effectiveness of atorvastatin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

BackgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in cancer. Although thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients is recommended by the guidelines, clinicians’ use of thromboprophylaxis remains limited due to cost, bleeding complications, and reluctance to give injectable anticoagulants. Inflammation plays essential roles in the pathogenesis of cancer-associated thrombosis. Owing to its ability to decrease proinflammatory cytokines, statins have anti-inflammatory properties. Thus, statins can be possibly utilized as thromboprophylaxis therapy in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of atorvastatin and rivaroxaban for DVT prevention in high-risk thrombosis patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.MethodsDouble-blind, randomized controlled trial involving cancer patients with high-risk of thrombosis undergoing chemotherapy. We randomly assigned patients without deep-vein thrombosis at screening to receive atorvastatin 20 mg or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for up to 90 days. Doppler ultrasonography was performed 90 days following chemotherapy to diagnose DVT. Average cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to analyze the cost of atorvastatin compared to rivaroxaban.ResultsOf the eighty six patients who underwent randomization, primary efficacy end point was observed in 1 of 42 patients (2.3%) in the atorvastatin group and in 1 of 44 (2.2%) in the rivaroxaban group (Odds Ratio [OR], 0.953; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.240 to 3.971; p = 1.000). There was a significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding, 2 of 42 patients (4.8%) in the atorvastatin group and 12 of 44 (27.3%) in the rivaroxaban group (OR, 0.257; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.94; p = 0.007). The average cost-effectiveness ratio of using atorvastatin was lower than that of rivaroxaban.ConclusionAtorvastatin did not differ significantly from rivaroxaban in reducing the incidence of DVT, lower bleeding risk, and cost-effectiveness for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk thrombosis patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The presence of limited statistical power and wide confidence intervals in this study needs further study to strengthen the efficacy of atorvastatin as DVT prophylaxis in cancer patients.Trial registrationISRCTN71891829, Registration Date: 17/12/2020.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Combined With Hypertension: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Whether there are differences in direct oral anticoagulants efficacy and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) combined with hypertension is unclear. We therefore conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to assess the differences in the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with AF combined with hypertension. This multicenter retrospective cohort study was based on data from 15 centers in China and included 2086 patients with AF. We divided the patients into dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups according to their direct oral anticoagulants. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the groups. Due to our limited sample size, the number of cases of some clinical events with low incidence was small. During a mean follow-up period of 10 months, a total of 268 (12.9%) bleeding events occurred, including 27 (1.3%) major bleeding events and 241 (11.6%) minor bleeding events, and 45 (2.2%) thromboembolic events. In patients with AF combined with hypertension, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher major bleeding incidence than dabigatran (odds ratio [OR], 2.89 [95% confidence interval [CI, 1.22-6.87]; P = .012). In contrast, the risk of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was similar for rivaroxaban (OR, 0.55 [95%CI, 0.29-1.01]; P = .069) and dabigatran (OR, 0.82 [95%CI, 0.63-1.08]; P = .150). Based on the results of this study, in patients with AF and hypertension treated with direct oral anticoagulants, the incidence of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was not statistically different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but compared with rivaroxaban, dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding.

Updated Renal Dosage Recommendations for Rivaroxaban in Patients Experiencing or at Risk of Thromboembolic Disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban has been shown to provide similar efficacy and a lower risk of bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment and prevention of VTE. Rivaroxaban has been studied in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment, and this review summarizes current knowledge supporting its use in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] of 15 to < 30 mL/min) for the prevention, treatment, or prophylaxis of VTE. Clinical pharmacology studies have demonstrated an increase in rivaroxaban systemic exposure, factor Xa inhibition, and prothrombin time with decreasing renal function. These changes reach a plateau with comparable increases in exposure among individuals with moderate or severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease. The clinical development program for the treatment and prevention of VTE as well as prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following orthopedic surgery excluded patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min; however, a limited number of patients with severe renal impairment were enrolled. Efficacy outcomes in these patients with severe renal impairment were not meaningfully different from those of patients with higher levels of renal function. There was also no increase in the incidence of major bleeding with rivaroxaban in patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min. Taken together, these pharmacological and clinical data suggest that in patients with severe renal impairment, the approved dosages of rivaroxaban can be used in the treatment and prevention of VTE and for prophylaxis of DVT after hip or knee replacement surgery.

Nationwide Study in France To Predict One Year Major Bleeding and Validate the OAC3-PAD Score in Patients Undergoing Revascularisation for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease

Antithrombotic strategies are currently recommended for the treatment of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) but specific scores to assess the risk of bleeding in these patients are scarce. To fill the gap, the OAC3-PAD bleeding score was recently developed and validated in German cohorts. The aim of this study was to determine whether this score performs appropriately in another real world nationwide cohort. This 10 year retrospective, multicentre study based on French national electronic health data included patients who underwent revascularisation for LEAD between January 2013 and June 2022. The OAC3-PAD score was calculated and from this, the population was classified into four groups: low, low to moderate, moderate to high and high risk. A binary logistic regression model was applied, with major bleeding occurring at one year (defined using the International Classification of Diseases ICD-10) as the dependent variable. The performance of the OAC3-PAD bleeding score was investigated using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Among 161 205 patients hospitalised for LEAD treatment in French institutions, the one year incidence of major bleeding was 13 672 patients (8.5%). The distribution of the population according to the OAC3-PAD bleeding score was: 88 835 patients (55.1%), 34 369 (21.3%), 27 914 (17.3%), and 10 087 (6.3%) in the low, low to moderate, moderate to high, and high risk groups, respectively; with an incidence of one year major bleeding of 5.0%, 9.8%, 13.2%, and 21.3%. The OAC3-PAD model achieved an AUC of 0.650 to predict one year major bleeding following LEAD repair (95% CI 0.645 - 0.655), with a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.57. This nationwide analysis confirmed the accuracy of the OAC3-PAD model to predict one year major bleeding and served as external validation. Although further studies are required, it adds evidence and perspectives to further generalise its use to guide the management of patients with LEAD.

Bovine pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic mitral valves: results from a Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.

Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) between bovine pericardial and porcine bioprostheses are conflicting, with limited research in large-scale real-world clinical settings. This study examined clinical outcomes in MVR according to bioprosthesis type using a national administrative claims database. This study included adult patients undergoing bioprosthetic MVR between 2003 and 2018 using administrative health care data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Propensity score matching with competing risk analysis was used to compare the clinical outcomes according to the type of bioprosthesis. The end points were death, cardiac death, and valve-related events, including the incidence of reoperation, endocarditis, systemic thromboembolism, and major bleeding. A total of 3151 patients underwent bioprosthetic MVR with bovine pericardial (n = 1628, 51.7%) or porcine (n = 1523, 48.3%) bioprostheses. After matching, 1170 pairs were included in the final analysis. During follow-up (median 4.49 years, interquartile range 1.87 -8.75 years), death occurred in 1178 patients (6.8%/patient-year), comprising 730 (4.3%/patient-year) cardiac death. No significant differences were noted between the bovine and porcine groups in the cumulative incidences of death from any cause [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-1.14], cardiac mortality (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.14), or reoperation (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.41). This study on a nationwide comparison between bovine and porcine bioprostheses in MVR found no significant differences in clinical outcomes including mortality, and valve-related reoperation.

Incidence, source, and prognostic impact of major bleeding across the spectrum of aortic stenosis

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been associated with bleeding. However, there is a lack of prospective assessment of bleeding events and their clinical significance in a large population of outpatients with variable degree of AS severity. To assess the incidence, source, determinants, and prognostic impact of major bleeding in patients with variable degree of AS severity. Between May 2016 and December 2017, consecutive outpatients were included. Major bleeding was defined as type ≥3 bleed using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. Cumulative incidence was calculated with death as the competing event. Data was censored at time of aortic valve replacement. Among 2,830 patients, 46 major bleeding events occurred (0.7%/year) during a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range: 1.4-2.7). Most frequent sites of bleeding were gastrointestinal (50%) and intracranial (30.4%). Major bleeding was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 5.93 (95% confidence interval 3.64-9.65); P < .001). AS severity was associated with major bleedings (P=.041). By multivariable analysis, severe AS was an independent determinant of major bleeding (hazard ratio vs mild AS: 3.59 [95% confidence interval 1.56-8.29]; P=.003). The increased risk of bleeding associated with severe AS was significantly exacerbated in patients using oral anticoagulation. In AS patients, major bleeding is rare but a strong independent predictor of death. AS severity is a determinant of bleeding events. Severe AS and oral anticoagulation should be identified as an association at very high risk of major bleeding.

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIAL VERSUS FEMORAL ACCESS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES IN PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a medical condition in which the blood vessels outside the heart and brain were affected. The study's main objective is to compare the effectiveness of radial versus femoral access for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease. The research article aimed to compare the effectiveness of radial and femoral access for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients with the peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The study was conducted in two hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan - Hayatabad Medical Complex and Lady Reading Hospital. The study duration was from January 2020 to December 2020. A total of 384 patients were enrolled in the study, with 192 randomly assigned to the radial access group and 192 to the femoral access group. The study found that RA was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding and access site complications compared to FA. Specifically, the incidence of major bleeding was 1.56% in the radial access group and 5.73% in the femoral access group (p=0.02), and the incidence of access site complications was 2.6% in the radial access group, 8.3% in the femoral access group (p=0.01). In conclusion, our study suggests that radial access is a safe and effective alternative to femoral access for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Radial access is associated with lower rates of major bleeding and access site complications, particularly for diagnostic procedures, and may offer advantages such as faster patient ambulation and improved patient comfort.

Impact of Weight on Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients in Pediatric Centers: An ACTION Registry Study.

Ventricular assist device (VAD) options vary for children in different weight groups. This study evaluates contemporary device usage and outcomes for children based on weight. Data from the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) registry were examined for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in 4 weight cohorts: <8 kg, 8-20 kg, 21-40 kg, and >40 kg, for devices implanted 3/2013-10/2020. Adverse event rates and ultimate outcome (deceased, alive on device, transplanted, or ventricular recovery) were analyzed. 222 DCM patients were identified with 24% in cohort 1, 23% in cohort 2, 15% in cohort 3, and 38% in cohort 4. Of 272 total implants, paracorporeal pulsatile devices were most common (95%) in cohorts 1 and 2 and intracorporeal continuous devices (81%) in cohorts 3 and 4. Stroke was noted in 17%, 12%, 6%, and 4% of cohorts, respectively (Cohort 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 4 - p = 0.01; other comparisons - not significant). Incidences of major bleeding, device malfunction, and infection was not different. All cohorts had >90% positive outcomes. Stroke incidence was higher in smaller cohorts, but other outcomes were similar. Positive outcomes were attained in over 90% across all weight groups, demonstrating excellent outcomes using current VADs in this DCM population.

Duration and clinical outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: A multicentre "real-world practice" registry-based study.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) ought to be determined taking into account individual ischaemic or bleeding events risks. To date, studies have provided inconclusive evidence on the effects of prolonged DAPT. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this strategy following percutaneous revascularization in the context of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Retrospectively from four centers in Madrid, we identified 750 consecutive ACS patients, divided in two groups of DAPT duration: <13 months and >13 months, with a mean follow-up of 48 months. Patients with DAPT > 13 months had a higher non-adjusted incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (11.6% vs. 17.3%) and new revascularization (3.7% vs. 8.7%). Differences in all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke were non-significant. There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding (7.4% vs. 6.3%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the independent risk predictors of MACE were age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, p < 0.001) and multivessel disease (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.32-3.95, p = 0.003), whereas the independent protective predictor was normal hemoglobin (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, p = 0.022). In this real-world registry cohort of ACS patients treated with PCI and 1 year of DAPT in Spain, we report a trend of increased rate of MACE and new revascularization not associated with TVR in patients with longer DAPT. Our findings support the need for future randomized controlled trials to confirm or refute these results.

Incidence of deep venous thrombosis in COVID-19 critically ill patients treated with intermediate-dose of heparin for thromboprophylaxis: The COVIDOP-DVT observational study.

The high prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) would justify systematic screening of these patients or higher therapeutic dose of heparin for thromboprophylaxis. We performed a systematic echo-Doppler of the lower limb proximal veins during the first 48 h (visit 1) and from 7 to 9 days after visit 1 (visit 2) in consecutive patients admitted to the ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary hospital for severe proven COVID-19 during the second wave. All patients received intermediate-dose heparin (IDH). The primary objective was to determine DVT incidence on venous Doppler ultrasound. Secondary objectives were to determine whether the presence of DVT modifies the anticoagulation regimen, the incidence of major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria, and the mortality rate of patients with and without DVT. We included 48 patients (30 [62.5%] men) with a median age of 63 years [IQR, 54-70]. The prevalence of proximal deep vein thrombosis was 4.2% (2/48). In these two patients, after DVT diagnosis, anticoagulation was changed from intermediate to curative dose. Two patients (4.2%) had a major bleeding complication according to ISTH criteria. Among the 48 patients, 9 (18.8%) died before hospital discharge. No DVT or pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in these deceased patients during their hospital stay. In critically ill patients with COVID-19, management with IDH results in a low incidence of DVT. Although our study is not designed to demonstrate any difference in outcome, our results do not suggest any signal of harm when using intermediate-dose heparin (IDH) COVID-19 with a frequency of major bleeding complications less than 5%.

Genetic-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection and Cumulative Ischemic Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BackgroundGenetic-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection has been proposed to reduce ischemic events by identifying CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) carriers at increased risk with clopidogrel treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A prespecified analysis of TAILOR-PCI (Tailored Antiplatelet Therapy Following PCI) evaluated the effect of genetic-guided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy on cumulative ischemic and bleeding events. ObjectivesHere, the authors detail a prespecified analysis of cumulative endpoints. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence rate of ischemic events at 12 months. Cumulative incidence of major and minor bleeding was a secondary endpoint. Cox proportional hazards models as adapted by Wei, Lin, and Weissfeld were used to estimate the effect of this strategy on all observed events. MethodsThe TAILOR-PCI trial was a prospective trial including 5,302 post-PCI patients with acute and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who were randomized to genetic-guided P2Y12 inhibitor or conventional clopidogrel therapy. In the genetic-guided group, LOF carriers were prescribed ticagrelor, whereas noncarriers received clopidogrel. TAILOR-PCI’s primary analysis was time to first event in LOF carriers. ResultsAmong 5,276 patients (median age 62 years; 25% women; 82% acute CAD; 18% stable CAD), 1,849 were LOF carriers (903 genetic-guided; 946 conventional therapy). The cumulative primary endpoint was significantly reduced in the genetic-guided group compared with the conventional therapy (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.89; P = 0.011) with no significant difference in cumulative incidence of major or minor bleeding (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.67-2.76; P = 0.39). ConclusionsAmong CYP2C19 LOF carriers undergoing PCI, a genetic-guided strategy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in cumulative ischemic events without a significant difference in bleeding. (Tailored Antiplatelet Therapy Following PCI [TAILOR-PCI]; NCT01742117)

Clinical outcomes of ultrasound-assisted coagulation monitoring-adjusted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism

BackgroundUltrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) may reverse right ventricular dysfunction due to acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with a favorable safety profile. MethodsWe studied intermediate-high- and high-risk acute PE patients who underwent USAT at the University Hospital Zurich, 2018–2022. The USAT regimen included alteplase 10 mg per catheter over 15 h, therapeutic-dosed heparin, and dosage adaptations based on routinely monitored coagulation parameters, notably anti-factor Xa activity and fibrinogen. We focused on the mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) before and after USAT, and reported the incidence of hemodynamic decompensation, PE recurrence, major bleeding, and death over 30 days. ResultsWe included 161 patients: 96 (59.6 %) were men and the mean age was 67.8 (SD 14.6) years. Mean PAP decreased from a mean of 35.6 (SD 9.8) to 25.6 (SD 8.2) mmHg, whereas the NEWS decreased from a median of 5 (Q1-Q3 4–6) to 3 (Q1-Q3 2–4) points. No cases of hemodynamic decompensation occurred. One (0.6 %) patient had an episode of recurrent PE. Two (1.2 %) major bleeding events occurred, including one (0.6 %) intracranial, fatal hemorrhage in a patient with high-risk PE, severe heparin overdosing, and a recent head trauma (with negative CT scan of the brain performed at baseline). No other deaths occurred. ConclusionsUSAT resulted in a rapid improvement of hemodynamic parameters among patients with intermediate-high risk acute PE and selected ones with high-risk acute PE, without any recorded deaths related to PE itself. A strategy including USAT, therapeutic-dosed heparin, and routinely monitored coagulation parameters may partly explain the overall very low rate of major bleeding.

Individual net clinical outcome with oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation using the ABC‐AF risk scores

BackgroundDecisions on stroke prevention strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) depend on the perceived risks of stroke and bleeding with different antithrombotic treatment strategies. The study objectives were to evaluate net clinical outcome with oral anticoagulation (OAC) for the individual patient with AF and to identify clinically relevant thresholds for OAC treatment. MethodsPatients with AF receiving OAC treatment in the randomized ARISTOTLE and RE-LY trials, with available biomarkers for calculation of ABC-AF scores at baseline, were included (n = 23,121). Observed 1-year risk on OAC was compared with predicted 1-year risk if the same patients would not have received OAC using the ABC-AF scores calibrated for aspirin. Net clinical outcome was defined as the sum of stroke and major bleeding risks. ResultsThe ratio between the 1-year incidence of major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism events ranged from 1.4 to 10.6 according to different ABC-AF risk profiles. Net clinical outcome analyses showed that in patients with an ABC-AF-stroke risk >1% per year on OAC (>3% without OAC), treatment with OAC consistently provides larger net clinical benefit than no-OAC treatment. In patients with an ABC-AF-stroke risk <1.0% per year on OAC (<3% without OAC) an individualized balancing of risks regarding OAC or no-OAC treatment is needed. ConclusionsIn patients with AF, the ABC-AF risk scores allow an individual and continuous estimate of the balance between benefits and risks with OAC treatment. This precision medicine tool therefore seems useful as decision support and visualizes the net clinical benefit or harm with OAC treatment (http://www.abc-score.com/abcaf/). Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00412984 (ARISTOTLE) and NCT00262600 (RE-LY).

Verification of selective and individual pulmonary thromboembolism prophylaxes for cesarean delivery.

This study aimed to verify the utility of simple, safe, and effective venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and implement it with few adverse events during cesarean delivery. This single-center, prospective study involved pregnant women who underwent cesarean deliveries from August 3, 2020 to March 31, 2022. Patients with VTE risk factors were initially administered unfractionated heparin (5,000 international unit [IU] subcutaneously, twice daily), 6 hours after cesarean delivery. Subsequently, they were administered enoxaparin (2,000 IU subcutaneously, twice daily). They were not administered anticoagulants if one or more of the exclusion criteria were met. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of symptomatic VTE. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding. Out of the 850 women eligible for this study, 551 (64.9%) had one or more VTE risk factors and 299 (35.1%) had no risk factors. Of the 551 women with one or more VTE risk factors, 15 met one or more exclusion criteria for enoxaparin administration. A total of 314 women received only perioperative mechanical prophylaxis, including 15 who met the exclusion criteria for anticoagulants and 299 without VTE risk factors. During implementation of the protocol, no woman developed symptomatic VTE after cesarean delivery. Major bleeding occurred in only one woman who received postoperative anticoagulants. This protocol, which clarified the administration of anticoagulants according to VTE risk factors and dose reduction/discontinuation criteria, may be an effective and safe VTE prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries.

Increased major bleeding incidence in atrial fibrillation patients with apixaban: a review of Japanese post-marketing surveillance studies of direct oral anticoagulants

Large-scaled post-marketing surveillance studies (PMSSs) of 4 direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) were conducted since 2011 in Japan, and the results of the last one have recently been published. Each reported a more than acceptable ischemic stroke prevention. The major bleeding rates were also acceptably low and comparable to each other in the PMSSs of dabigatran (J-dabigatran), rivaroxaban (XAPASS), and edoxaban (ETNA-AF-Japan). However, the incidence in PMSS of apixaban (STANDARD) was more than double the others. This finding appeared to contradict the globally accepted theory that apixaban is less likely than other DOACs to cause bleeding events. Possible responsible mechanisms included (1) the age and kidney function, (2) concomitant antiplatelet therapy, (3) drug actions, (4) follow-up duration, and (5) dose reduction criteria. Similarities in the clinical background shared by the 4 different PMSSs' participants and knowledge from previous studies did not support a dominant contribution of any of those former 4 factors to the increased major bleeding incidence in STANDARD. A possibility of the 5th factor was then examined. An estimated calculation we created showed that apixaban's dose reduction criteria was strict enough to considerably reduce the opportunity for participants to take its reduced rather than standard dose. We then successfully simulated how the "strict" dose reduction criteria would have increased the bleeding event rates under DOAC therapy. The discussion in this review may therefore raise a question about the validity of the current dose reduction criteria of apixaban for Japanese AF patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Different Anticoagulant Doses for Patients with COVID-19 in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Critically ill COVID-19 patients have a high incidence of thromboembolic events, which significantly influence the risk of mortality. Anticoagulant therapy is generally recommended to these patients but the optimal dosing regimens require further investigations. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of prophylactic, intermediate and therapeutic dose anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. A systematic search for original prospective observational studies and clinical trials was performed in online databases from 2020 to 2022. A total of 13 studies (3239 patients) were included. The type of anticoagulant dosing showed no significant influence on short-term mortality (p = 0.84), deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.66), arterial thrombosis (p = 0.44), major bleeding (p = 0.35) and minor bleeding incidence (p = 0.46). An anticoagulation regimen significantly influenced pulmonary embolism occurrence (16% for prophylactic dose vs. 4% for therapeutic dose, p = 0.02), but the number of studies in the analysis was relatively low. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted in the ICU have no benefit from therapeutic doses of anticoagulants and that all three thromboprophylaxis regimes have a comparable effect on short term mortality and venous thromboembolism incidence but for pulmonary embolism, for which the results were inconclusive.

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion: An update systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundA systematic evaluation focused on efficacy and safety for electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) among different Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) has not been previously performed. In this setting, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies evaluating DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) as common comparator. MethodsWe searched Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Web Of Science and Scopus databases for all English-only articles concerning studies that have estimated the effect of DOACs and VKA on stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding (MB) events in AF patients undergoing electrical cardioversion. We selected 22 articles comprising 66 cohorts and 24,322 procedures (12,612 with VKA). ResultsDuring follow-up (studies' median 42 days), 135 SSE (52 DOACs and 83 VKA) and 165 MB (60 DOACs and 105 VKA) were recorded. The overall pooled effects, DOACs vs VKA, was estimated by an univariate Odds Ratio of 0.92 (0.63–1.33; p = 0.645) for SSE and 0.58 (0.41–0.82; p = 0.002) for MB; at bivariate evaluation, adjusting for study type, were respectively 0.94 (0.55–1.63; p = 0.834) and 0.63 (0.43–0.92, p = 0.016). Each single DOAC showed similar and non statistically different results in outcome occurrence compared to VKA as well as when Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban and Rivaroxaban were indirectly compared to each other. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing electrical cardioversion, compared to VKA, DOACs have similar thromboembolic protection with lower major bleeding incidence. Single molecule does not show difference in event rate compared to each other. Our findings, provide useful information about safety and efficacy profile of DOACs and VKA.

Comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran for prevention of stroke and embolism in the vessels of the systemic circulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Aim . To compare the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) for preventing stroke and systemic thromboembolism (embolism in the vessels of the systemic circulation, systemic embolism) in terms of pharmacoeconomic indicators. Materials and Methods . The economic assessment was carried out from the standpoint of the healthcare system of the Russian Federation. We used published data on the clinical efficacy and safety of DOACs, which were obtained earlier in clinical trials. The efficacy of therapy was assessed by the incidence of ischemic stroke (IS) of systemic embolism (SE), while the safety was assessed by the incidence of major bleeding (MB) and clinically signifi cant minor bleeding (CSNMB). The total cost of patient management for each alternative treatment option included both the cost of drug therapy and the cost of managing adverse events over a study horizon of 12 months. The conclusion about the most preferred alternative was made on the basis of the ratio of effectiveness and cost of treating the patient. Results . The use of apixaban to prevent IS or SE in patients with AF was accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of their development (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.73–0.89; HR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.60–0.85 — compared with rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively), as well as a decrease in the frequency of MB compared with other DOACs (HR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.53–0.59; HR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.70–0.87 — compared with rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively). Since apixaban was more effective and safer than rivaroxaban and dabigatran, a cost-effectiveness approach was applied in this study. The least expensive treatment regimen included apixaban, the direct cost was 33,263 roubles per patient. The advantage was achieved both due to the lower of therapy with apixaban (29.6–34.0 % lower than other DOACs) and the minimum cost of managing the adverse events: for MB and CSNMB, it was reduced by 20.7 % compared to dabigatran and by 44.7 % compared to rivaroxaban; for stroke/SE, it was reduced by 25.9 % and 20.6 %, respectively. Conclusion . In patients with AF, apixaban was more cost-effective compared with rivaroxaban or dabigatran for preventing IS and SE, as it led to higher clinical efficacy and safety while requiring less healthcare system costs.