Incidence Of Laboratory Animal Allergy Research Articles

Laboratory animal allergy: a new world.

In recent years there has been a dramatic shift in the world of animal research whereby genetically modified mice have largely supplanted rats, and individually ventilated cages have been introduced to house delicate experimental animals in place of traditional open cages. Although laboratory animal allergy remains an important cause of occupational asthma, the risks associated with contemporary practice and consequently the opportunities for primary and secondary prevention are largely unknown. Although there is clear confirmation of a widespread increase in animal experiments using mice, the evidence-base on the associated risks has lagged. Individually ventilated cages reduce ambient levels of mouse urinary protein in air but task-based exposures are unquantified. Immunological techniques to identify sensitization to mouse proteins are poorly standardized. The available evidence suggests that modern practices are, in most cases, associated with a reduced incidence of animal sensitization. There is a paucity of data to inform evidence-based practice in methods to control the incidence of laboratory animal allergy under the prevailing research environment; a better understanding of the relationship between exposures and outcome is urgently needed. As exposures decline, the relative importance of individual susceptibility will become prominent.

Prevention of Laboratory Animal Allergy in the United States

Respiratory allergy to laboratory animals is a common and preventable occupational health problem. This study documents current laboratory animal allergy (LAA) prevention programs in the United States. An online survey was e-mailed to designated institutional officials at laboratory animal facilities identified by the National Institutes of Health Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. A total of 198 organizations responded and more than 80% required the use of uniforms and gloves to control exposure. Respirators were required by 25% of organizations. Medical surveillance was mandated by 58% of organizations (70% for organizations with at least 100 employees working with animals). Work restriction practices varied. Only 25% of organizations reported knowing the prevalence (range: 0% to 75%) and 29% reported knowing the incidence of LAA (range: 0% to 18%). There is broad variation in policy and practice to prevent LAA. An evidence-based consensus would ensure greater protection of workers.

Incidence of allergy and allergy symptoms among workers exposed to laboratory animals

Background and Aims: Few studies have described relations between exposure to laboratory animals and the incidence of laboratory animal allergy (LAA). Studies that have found exposure-response relations have been cross...

Laboratory animal allergy: a British perspective on a global problem.

In the United Kingdom, laboratory animal allergy (LAA) has been recognized as an important occupational disease for nearly 25 years. However, introduction of health and safety legislation (e.g., the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations of 1988) and an increasing knowledge of the factors that contribute to the etiology of this disease have had surprisingly little impact on the prevalence and incidence of LAA over the last 10 to 20 yr. Studies of the relation between exposure to animal allergens and the development of LAA reveal that the risk of disease increases with increasing intensity of exposure. Current evidence suggests that animal allergens are very potent, and substantial decreases in allergen exposure are therefore necessary before a reduction in symptoms will be observed. In the United Kingdom, it is unlikely that an Occupational Exposure Limit will be set for animal allergens in the near future, partly because an adequately standardized assay for quantifying exposure is not yet available. Prevention of LAA in the future will probably be driven by the needs of the industry and will most likely rely on the adoption of guidelines describing " best practise" which incorporate sophisticated engineering methods of controlling exposure to animal allergens.

Prevention of laboratory animal allergy.

Laboratory animal allergy (LAA) is a significant occupational hazard for workers in a number of research settings, including the pharmaceutical industry. Prevention of allergy and asthma is important because the illness can affect health and career. In a major pharmaceutical company, in an effort to prevent LAA, a comprehensive program to reduce exposure to environmental allergens was developed. The program included education, engineering controls, administrative controls, use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance. A prospective survey of five years of data was completed to determine the effect of the program on the prevalence and incidence of LAA. After instituting this program, we found that the prevalence of LAA ranged from 12%-22% and that the incidence was reduced to zero during the last two years of observation. We concluded that LAA is preventable through the implementation of a comprehensive effort to reduce exposure to allergens.

Variation in rat urinary aeroallergen levels explained by differences in site, task and exposure group

We describe how much of the variation in rat urinary aeroallergen (RUA) levels may be explained by differences in site and exposure group in research establishments and we identify task categories associated with high RUA levels. In this population 73% of the variability in RUA levels could be explained by exposure group, site and their interaction term. Exposure group alone explained the majority of the variation (69%). The task category associated with the highest RUA level was cleaning out, followed by indirect contact with rats and handling rats. The task categories associated with the lowest levels were slide production, post mortem and experiments. These results may help choose appropriate exposure measures for epidemiological studies in research establishments in the future and may help reduce the incidence of laboratory animal allergy.

A follow-up study of laboratory animal exposed workers: the influence of atopy for the development of occupational asthma.

In a 5-year follow-up study of 88 animal exposed laboratory technicians, the incidence of laboratory animal allergy (LAA), lung function, and the development of allergy test reactivity were investigated. Only two individuals developed test positive LAA rhinitis during the follow-up period. Furthermore, one subject who had previously had LAA rhinitis developed LAA asthma. In the remaining subjects the results of skin prick tests against laboratory animals and environmental allergens, total serum IgE levels, and lung function were unchanged. Atopy defined as parental and childhood allergy, raised total serum IgE levels, and positive skin prick tests against nonanimal environmental allergens and nonlaboratory animals (dog and horse) were risk indicators for development of test positive LAA asthma. The low incidence of LAA during the 5-year follow-up is interpreted as a result of an early LAA development in atopic subjects.