The article by Kaban et al1 appearing in this month's issue ofPediatrics is of interest because it describes, to the best of my knowledge, the first completely successful medical treatment of a primary giant cell tumor of the bone with the angiogenesis inhibitor interferon α-2a. Previously, a 37-year-old woman with a benign giant cell tumor of the leg that spread to the lungs demonstrated a significant decrease in pulmonary metastases and stabilization of disease following treatment with interferon α-2a.2 Giant cell tumors of the bone have 3 major cell types: 1) proliferating mononuclear cells thought to be the neoplastic element of the tumor, 2) nonproliferating mononuclear cells, and 3) multinucleated giant cell that are fused mononuclear cells.3 The incidence of giant cell tumors among primary bone neoplasms is 4% to 5%, with most occurring around the knee and <1% in the skull. Because 95% are benign, the incidence of these tumors among benign bone tumors rises to 18%.4,5 More than 50 cases of pulmonary metastases associated with benign giant cell tumors have been described.6 Aneurysmal bone cysts are associated with almost 15% of giant cell tumors, as was the case in this present study. With rare exceptions, giant cell tumors occur in skeletally mature individuals, with about 75% occurring in patients between 15 and 40 years of age. It has been estimated that only 1.7% of giant cell tumors occur in skeletally immature individuals.4The treatment for giant cell tumors is problematic. Approximately 40% to 70% of these lesions recur after marginal resection (curettage), although this rate can be decreased to about 25% if the lesion has a low histologic stage. Less than 10% of these tumors recur after wide resection; a procedure often limited because of the location of the lesion and/or the desire to preserve limb function.4 Conventional anticancer chemotherapy has occasionally been reported to be effective,5 while radiation therapy is associated with a recurrence rate of about 50%. The problem with radiotherapy is that it not only carries the usual risk of radiation-induced sarcoma but also the risk of radiation-induced giant cell tumor-specific sarcomas. This later risk has been estimated to be from 7% to 33%, although modern radiation techniques are said to decrease this risk.4Because of the rather limited success of current therapeutic modalities, the apparent success of interferon α-2a therapy is a welcome discovery. Many more typical patients, (ie older with extremity lesions), will have to be successfully treated before one can say with any surety that this inhibitor of angiogenesis is effective.7 After attending a lecture at which Dr Folkman discussed the case described in this month's issue, we gave interferon α-2a to a 17-year-old female with a nonosseous, pelvic, giant cell tumor that could not be removed surgically and was completely resistant to radiotherapy and embolization. A significant reduction in tumor size was observed and the patient regained some of the function that was compromised as a result of compression and local infiltration.In addition to those tumors discussed by Kaban et al that are responsive to interferon, interferon has also been shown to be effective in immunoblastic lymphadenopathy8 and, along with interleukin 2, renal cell carcinoma.9 Administration of interferon has been associated with fever, fatigue, anorexia, myelosuppression, and central nervous system and gastrointestinal toxicity.10 Cardiovascular complications have been observed and they include rhythm abnormalities, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and hypotension. Some of these cardiac problems may be attributable, in part, to the inhibitory effects of interferon on neovascularization which, in turn, may lead to an increase in the thickness of the endothelial processes of myocardial capillary walls.11The web site for the National Cancer Institute lists more than 20 phase I-III trials, each evaluating a different angiogenesis inhibitor, that are currently open for patients with various types of cancer. If only some of these studies are successful, we will have added to our armamentarium antitumor agents that, either alone or in combination with current antineoplastic agents, are less toxic and more tumor-specific than our present therapeutic regimens. Furthermore, because these agents have a unique mechanism of action, they may prove effective when other, more conventional, therapy fails. The study of angiogenesis inhibitors is of intense interest and promise.