Incidence Of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection Research Articles

Impact of Small Variations in the Delivered Dose of Rabbit Antithymocyte Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation With Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal

Optimal dosing of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction therapy in kidney transplantation is not well defined. The impact of dosing from variations in dose rounding or single dose limits has not been studied. This retrospective study of 242 adult renal transplant recipients receiving rATG induction and steroid-sparing maintenance therapy evaluates the effect of small changes in rATG induction dosing. The local protocol calls for four doses of rATG 1.5 mg/kg, approximated to the nearest 25 mg and limited to a max of 150 mg. Patients were stratified by total rATG dose received 5 to 6 mg/kg (n=151) and 6 mg/kg (n=91) or more. Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and allograft function were examined. Baseline and transplantation characteristics were similar between groups except for differences in mean weight (SD) (81 [17.3] vs. 76.3 [15.6]) and cumulative rATG dose received (451.8 [96.2] vs. 481.1 [93]) for patients in the 5- to 6-mg/kg group and 6-mg/kg or more group, respectively. Patients who received more rATG showed a significantly lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at last follow-up 11% (32/151) vs. 21.2% (10/91) among those who received only 5 to 6 mg/kg (P<0.042). Renal function (mean serum creatinine level) was similar at both 90 days and time of last follow-up. Safety review of leukopenia or thrombocytopenia did not differ. Small changes in total rATG induction administered seem to significantly impact the incidence of rejection. Adequate rATG dosing is associated with improved rejection-free graft survival and should be achieved for all patients; doses should be rounded up when appropriate or additional doses should be administered if necessary.

Alemtuzumab Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation

Alemtuzumab (MabCampath or Campath; Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) is a CD52-specific monoclonal antibody that causes profound and sustained lymphocyte depletion. Its use as an induction therapy in organ transplantation is increasing. Since our last systematic review in 2006, where we identified the need for good-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), several RCTs have been published that examine its efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current evidence for alemtuzumab induction therapy in kidney transplantation. We performed a systematic literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Transplant Library from the Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Inclusion criteria specified all RCTs in which kidney transplant recipients receiving induction with alemtuzumab were compared with those receiving another induction agent or no induction. Studies were assessed for methodological quality. The primary outcome was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) (Banff grade ≥1), and secondary outcomes included graft loss, renal function, delayed graft function (DGF), patient death, and the incidence of infection, autoimmunity, malignancy, and new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation. Ten RCTs, with a total of 1223 patients, were included. Studies were grouped according to induction regimens. Alemtuzumab induction has a lower risk of BPAR compared with induction with the interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (IL-2RAs): basiliximab (Simulect; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and daclizumab (Zenapax; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) combined (relative risk, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.79; P<0.01). No significant difference was observed in the risk of BPAR when alemtuzumab induction was compared with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin [Genzyme] or ATG-Fresenius S [Fresenius, Munich, Germany]) (relative risk, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.21; P=0.28). There was no difference in graft loss, DGF, patient death, and new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation when alemtuzumab was compared with IL-2RAs or rATG induction. The effect of alemtuzumab induction on renal function and the incidence of infection, malignancy, and autoimmunity were limited by the data available. There were two trials comparing alemtuzumab with no induction, but neither trial reported a significant reduction in BPAR at 12 months. Alemtuzumab induction reduces the risk of BPAR compared with IL-2RAs but not rATG. Because the incidence of other efficacy outcomes (graft loss, DGF, and patient death) was similar, if it is felt that an induction agent is necessary, then our analysis suggests that it is more acceptable to base the choice of induction agent on safety outcomes and/or costs.

Conversion From Cyclosporine to Everolimus at 4.5 Months Posttransplant: 3-Year Results From the Randomized ZEUS Study

The long-term effect of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy to an mTOR inhibitor requires clarification. Following completion of the 12-month, open-label, multicenter ZEUS study, in which 300 kidney transplant recipients were randomized to continue cyclosporine (CsA) or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant, outcomes were assessed at month 36 (n = 284; 94.7%). CNI therapy was reintroduced in 28.4% of everolimus patients by month 36. The primary efficacy endpoint, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell, ANCOVA) was significantly higher with everolimus versus the CsA group at month 24 (7.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , 95%CI 4.3, 11.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ; p < 0.001) and month 36 (7.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , 95%CI 3.6, 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ; p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection from randomization to month 36 was 13.0% in the everolimus arm and 4.8% in the CsA arm (p = 0.015). Patient and graft survival, as well as incidences of malignancy, severe infections and hospitalization, were similar between groups. Kidney transplant patients who are converted from CsA to everolimus at month 4.5 and who remain on everolimus thereafter may achieve a significant improvement in renal function that is maintained to 3 years. There was a significantly higher rate of rejection in the everolimus arm but this did not exert a deleterious effect by 3 years posttransplant.

Everolimus plus early tacrolimus minimization: a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial in renal transplantation

There is increasing interest in tacrolimus-minimization regimens. ASSET was an open-label, randomized, 12-month study of everolimus plus tacrolimus in de-novo renal-transplant recipients. Everolimus trough targets were 3-8 ng/ml throughout the study. Tacrolimus trough targets were 4-7 ng/ml during the first 3 months and 1.5-3 ng/ml (n = 107) or 4-7 ng/ml (n = 117) from Month 4. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. The primary objective was to demonstrate superior estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; MDRD-4) at Month 12 in the tacrolimus 1.5-3 ng/ml versus the 4-7 ng/ml group. Secondary endpoints included incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR; Months 4-12) and serious adverse events (SAEs; Months 0-12). Statistical significance was not achieved for the primary endpoint (mean eGFR: 57.1 vs. 51.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), potentially due to overlapping of achieved tacrolimus exposure levels (Month 12 mean ± SD, tacrolimus 1.5-3 ng/ml: 3.4 ± 1.4; tacrolimus 4-7 ng/ml: 5.5 ± 2.0 ng/ml). BPAR (months 4-12) and SAE rates were comparable between groups (2.7% vs. 1.1% and 58.7% vs. 51.3%; respectively). Everolimus-facilitated tacrolimus minimization, to levels lower than previously investigated, achieved good renal function, low BPAR and graft-loss rates, and an acceptable safety profile in renal transplantation over 12 months although statistically superior renal function of the 1.5-3 ng/ml tacrolimus group was not achieved.

Efficacy of Anti-Interleukin-2 Receptor Antibody in Reducing the Incidence of Acute Rejection After Renal Transplantation

Dear Editor, Acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients is a major risk factor for chronic allograft failure and reduction in early and long term mean graft survival. New immunosuppressant agents have been developed to reduce the incidence of these episodes (1). Immunobiological drugs such as monoclonal anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies have shown promise in this direction; they have a more restrict immunosuppressive effect, are not related to interleukin release syndrome and are related to lower rates of CMV infection than polyclonal antibodies (2). In his trial Saghafi et al. (3) showed a reduction of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) episodes in non-related living donor kidney transplant recipients performing anti-interleukin-2 receptor, daclizumab, as an induction drug in addition to standard therapy with cyclosporine, mycophenolate and prednisone. The induction group had a statistically significant (20.8%) reduction in rejection episodes compared to control group using only standard therapy after a six month follow up (3). Resembling data had already been shown in previous studies, Vincent et al. showed similar reduction in incidence of BPAR in low immunologic risk deceased donor kidney recipients and the same rate of bacterial infections and/or viral infections, including CMV, malignances and adverse event as placebo group (4). Another study showed a reduction in the incidence of BPAR in deceased and living kidney recipients of about 14 % in the group that underwent induction therapy with daclizumab with no increase in infections and adverse events (1). Saghafi et al. in accordance with other authors showed daclizumab as an effective induction treatment option for low immunologic risk living donor kidney recipients. However, missing data about safety drug profile such as incidence of infection, adverse events, CMV infection, and early and late cyclosporine trough levels are not reported in the text. There are several studies confirming that induction therapy with either monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in addition to standard therapy reduces the incidence of acute rejection but none of these studies have shown statistically significant improving in long term graft survival. New trials such as ELITE-symphony (5) study performing inteleukin-2 receptor antibody as a calcineurin inhibitor sparing agent showed promising results when comparing classical treatment protocol with standard cyclosporine dose, mycophenolate and corticosteroids with daclizumab, corticosteroids and mycophenolate and low dose cyclosporine or low dose tacrolimus or low dose sirolimus. This study found better outcomes in term of lower incidence of acute rejection, adverse events, infections and a better allograft survival rates in daclizumab and low dose tacrolimus group (5). Improving long-term outcomes in renal transplantation is still a field of challenge and numbness but the use of induction agents in adjunction with other drugs for reducing their side effects is a promising strategy for better graft and patient survival. Perhaps, most important induction therapy importance is in minimizing exposure to other immunosuppressive therapy and its side effects and this topic deserves research.

Renal Function and NODM inDe NovoRenal Transplant Recipients Treated with Standard and Reduced Levels of Tacrolimus in Combination with EC-MPS

Information is lacking concerning concomitant administration of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with tacrolimus (EC-MPS+Tac) in renal transplant recipients (RTxR). In this 6-month, prospective, open-label, multicenter study, de novo RTxR were randomized (1 : 1) to low-dose (LD) or standard-dose (SD) Tac with basiliximab, EC-MPS 720 mg bid, and steroids. Primary objective was to compare renal function at 6-month posttransplantation. Secondary objectives were to compare the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss and death, and new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). 292 patients (LD n = 151, SD n = 141) were included. Mean Tac levels were at the low end of the target range in standard-exposure patients (SD, n = 141) and exceeded target range in low-exposure patients (LD = 151) throughout the study. There was no significant difference in mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between treatments (ITT-population: 63.6 versus 61.0 mL/min). Incidence of BPAR was similar (10.6% versus 9.9%). NODM was significantly less frequent in LD Tac (17% versus 31%; P = 0.02); other adverse effects (AEs) were comparable. EC-MPS+Tac (LD/SD) was efficacious and well tolerated with well-preserved renal function. No renal function benefits were demonstrated, possibly related to poor adherence to reduced Tac exposure.

Randomized Trial of Dual Antibody Induction Therapy With Steroid Avoidance in Renal Transplantation

Given our previous experience using dual-induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)/daclizumab (Dac) (each with fewer doses than if used alone), we chose to compare two distinct dual-induction strategies. Single-center, open-label randomized trial of 200 primary kidney transplant recipients was performed: (group I, n=100) ATG/Dac (3 ATG, 2 Dac doses) versus (group II, n=100) ATG/alemtuzumab (1 dose each), with maintenance consisting of reduced tacrolimus dosing (rTd), enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), and early corticosteroid withdrawal. One half of standard EC-MPS dosing was targeted in group II to avoid severe leukopenia previously seen with alemtuzumab. The goal in both arms was to achieve rapid and effective lymphocyte depletion while simultaneously allowing reduced maintenance immunosuppression. Primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). With median follow-up of 38 months, there were no differences in BPAR rates: 14 of 100 vs. 13 of 100 (including borderline) and 10 of 100 vs. 9 of 100 (excluding borderline) in groups I and II, respectively (nonsignificant). Actuarial patient/graft survival at 48 months was 96%/91% in group I vs. 92%/83% in group II (N.S.). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (±standard error) at 36 months was 72.1±3.3 vs. 67.5±3.3 in groups I and II (N.S.). Greater incidence of leukopenia occurred in group II at month 1 only (P=0.002). Percentages having EC-MPS withheld/discontinued due to leukopenia, gastrointestinal symptoms, and infection were 12 of 100, 7 of 100, and 0 of 100 in group I vs. 19 of 100, 0 of 100, and 2 of 100 in group II, respectively (P=0.01). Rates of new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation and infections were equally low in both groups (no lymphoproliferative disorders were observed). These two distinct dual-induction therapies with rTd, EC-MPS, and planned early corticosteroid withdrawal resulted in favorable rates of BPAR and all secondary outcomes.

Preliminary results of transplantation with kidneys donated after cardiocirculatory determination of death: a French single-centre experience

Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD), formerly non-heart-beating donation and donation after cardiac death, has been re-introduced into clinical practice in France since June 2006 as a potential solution to organ shortage, but this kidney transplantation programme is not popular yet, mainly because of logistical concerns and uncertainty about the long-term warm ischaemia impact on transplanted kidneys. Our institution started the DCDD programme in January 2007, following the national 'BioMedicine Agency' protocol. We only considered uncontrolled donors with an initial no-flow period (i.e. delay between collapse and external cardiac massage start) <30 min. A 5-min stand-off period was observed before declaring the death and performing in situ cold perfusion, and since January 2010, normothermic subdiaphragmatic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. All kidneys were machine-perfused using the hypothermic pulsatile preservation system before transplantation. Morphologic assessment and perfusion indexes were used to assess the suitability for transplantation. From January 2007 to December 2010, our team performed 58 kidney transplantations from uncontrolled Maastricht Category I and II donors. Mean recipient age was 47 ± 9 years. Male/female ratio was 45/13. Mean waiting time on transplantation registry was 30 months (4-180). Mean cold ischaemia time was 13 h 40 min (7-18) and pulsatile perfusion time 8 h (1-16). We had three cases (5%) of primary non-function (PNF) and 95% of delayed graft function. There was no increase in biopsy-proven acute rejection incidence (12.7%). Patient and graft survivals were 98 and 91.4%, respectively, at 1 year and 98 and 88%, respectively, at last follow-up. Estimated glomerular filtration rate ( Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) was 48 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year and 48 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at the last follow-up. DCDD kidneys are a valuable additional source of organs for transplantation. Our results show encouraging outcomes, which give rise to further interest in this donor pool. Respecting the national protocol is crucial to prevent PNF and deleterious warm ischaemia effect on transplanted kidney.

Early Steroid Withdrawal and Optimization of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Mycophenolate Mofetil

Early posttransplant steroid withdrawal may increase the risk of acute rejection and the occurrence of subclinical acute rejection (SCAR). We assessed the feasibility and safety of early steroid withdrawal in low-risk patients receiving cyclosporine A (CsA) and the impact of optimization of mycophenolic acid exposure on steroid withdrawal success. De novo, low-immunological risk kidney recipients received an anti-interleukin-2-receptor-α antibody induction, a short course of 7 days of corticosteroids, and CsA with 2-hr postdose concentration monitoring. They were randomized to adjusted dose (AD) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) or a fixed-dose (FD) regimen. MMF 3 g was initiated posttransplant and then adjusted starting at week 2 to a 0 to 12 hr area under the concentration time curve of 40 mg · h/L versus 2 g daily, respectively. The primary endpoint was a composite of the proportion of patients experiencing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and those with SCAR identified on the 3-month protocol biopsy. Among 247 analyzed patients, only 22 in the AD group and 17 in the FD group experienced BPAR or SCAR (P=0.46). The rate of SCAR was low: 4% (AD) and 2.5% (FD). No between-group difference in the incidence of BPAR was observed. TDM yielded MMF doses ranging from 1 to 4 g/d and significantly reduced interpatient variability at weeks 26 and 52 in the AD group. In low-immunological risk kidney recipients, MMF combined with CsA allows early corticosteroid discontinuation with good tolerability. In this group of patients, TDM of MMF does not improve clinical outcome.

The PROMISE Study: A Phase 2b Multicenter Study of Voclosporin (ISA247) Versus Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplantation

Voclosporin (VCS, ISA247) is a novel calcineurin inhibitor being developed for organ transplantation. PROMISE was a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label study of three ascending concentration-controlled groups of VCS (low, medium and high) compared to tacrolimus (TAC) in 334 low-risk renal transplant recipients. The primary endpoint was demonstration of noninferiority of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) rates. Secondary objectives included renal function, new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), hypertension, hyperlipidemia and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation. The incidence of BPAR in the VCS groups (10.7%, 9.1% and 2.3%, respectively) was noninferior to TAC (5.8%). The incidence of NODAT for VCS was 1.6%, 5.7% and 17.7% versus 16.4% in TAC (low-dose VCS, p = 0.03). Nankivell estimated glomerular filtration rate was respectively: 71, 72, 68 and 69 mL/min, statistically lower in the high-dose group, p = 0.049. The incidence of hypertension and adverse events was not different between the VCS groups and TAC. VCS demonstrated an excellent correlation between trough and area under the curve (r(2) = 0.97) and no difference in mycophenolic acid exposure compared to TAC. This 6-month study shows VCS to be as efficacious as TAC in preventing acute rejection with similar renal function in the low- and medium-exposure groups, and potentially associated with a reduced incidence of NODAT.

Machine perfusion following static cold storage preservation in kidney transplantation: donor-matched pair analysis of the prognostic impact of longer pump time

The impact of machine perfusion (MP) time on kidney transplant outcome is mixed in previous studies using multivariable analyses. In an analysis of 66 pairs of donor-matched adult, first transplant recipients (N = 132) with identical donor characteristics except for pump time, tests of association of shorter versus longer pump time (first versus second kidney removed) by delayed graft function(DGF), slow graft function(SGF), and biopsy proven acute rejection(BPAR) were performed using McNemar's test. Freedom-from-BPAR, graft and patient survival, and renal function were also compared. Mean ± SD pump times for paired recipients with first and second kidneys were 22.7 ± 7.3 h and 31.2 ± 7.9 h, respectively (mean difference: 8.5 ± 4.5 h, P < .000001). There was no significant impact of pump time on DGF or SGF, with discordant pairs favoring less SGF with longer pump time (N.S.). The incidence of BPAR during the first 12 months post-transplant yielded a borderline difference favoring longer pump time (P = .09), and freedom-from-BPAR during the first 12 months was significantly more favorable for longer pump times (95% vs. 84%, P = 0.04). No differences were observed in graft and patient survival, and renal function. While offering significantly favorable protection from BPAR, this analysis of donor-matched recipient pairs corroborates longer MP (pump) times having no unfavorable effect on other clinical outcomes.

The Influence of Cytomegalovirus Infections on Patient and Renal Graft Outcome: A 3-year, Multicenter, Observational Study (Post-ECTAZ Study)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections posttransplant may increase the risk of acute rejection, graft failure, patient death, opportunistic infections, malignancy, diabetes, and cardiovascular complications. ECTAZ, a multicenter, randomized trial compared safety and efficacy at 12 months (M12) of two doses daclizumab (54 patients, group D) with thymoglobulin (55 patients, group T), plus cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in first cadaveric kidney transplant patients. D+/R− patients received oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for 90 days. Post-ECTAZ is a 36-month, multicenter, observational study including recipients who participated in ECTAZ trial. We studied the indirect effects of CMV infections, whether recipients experienced (CMVi+) or not (CMVi−) a CMV infection/syndrome/disease. We compared 49 patients in the group CMVi+ with 54 patients in the group CMVi−. At month 36 (M36), patient survival, graft survival and renal function were comparable. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 16.3% in the CMVi+ group versus 24.1% in the CMVi− group (not significant). The incidence of infections was increased in the CMVi+ group ( P = .004), but not diabetes, malignancies, and cardiovascular complications. Our study shows at M36 that CMV infection/syndrome/disease episodes were associated with a higher incidence of infections but no difference for other long-term complications. Our data suggest that anti-CMV prophylaxis could decrease the risk for long-term related CMV complications.

Is laparoscopic donation safe for paediatric recipients? A study of 85 paediatric recipients comparing open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

The safety of adult laparoscopic donor nephrectomy remains controversial with respect to paediatric recipients with few data existing about its efficacy. Small studies have shown no difference in graft survival when compared with open techniques, but previous data from United Network for Organ Sharing suggests a higher incidence of rejection in laparoscopically procured kidneys. We examined the outcome in a total of 85 consecutive paediatric renal recipients, comparing 46 recipients of laparoscopically procured kidneys (performed over a 3-year period, 2004-07) to a historical control of 39 open donor recipients. Thirty-seven laparoscopic donors were by the hand-assisted technique. Mean recipient age was 9.8 (SD 5.04) years in the laparoscopic group and 10.4 (SD 4.67) years in the open group (P = 0.617). Two patients had delayed graft function in the laparoscopic group (4.3%) and one (2.5%) in the open group (P = 0.562). At 1 year follow-up, there was 100% graft survival in the laparoscopic group compared to 92% (P = 0.093) in the open group. Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection within 1 year of transplant was 26% (16 episodes in 12 patients) in the laparoscopic group compared to 41% (29 episodes in 16 patients) in the open group (P = 0.219). There were no deaths in the laparoscopic group but there were three deaths (7.6%) in the open group (P = 0.093). Our experience of laparoscopic kidney donation for paediatric recipients suggests excellent outcome with no difference in rejection rate or graft survival compared to open donation. Laparoscopic donation is the optimal method of kidney procurement for paediatric recipients.

Polymorphisms in CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 are Not Associated With Cyclosporine Pharmacokinetics Nor With Cyclosporine Clinical End Points After Renal Transplantation

The association of CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with cyclosporine (CsA) pharmacokinetics is controversial. The authors studied the influence of these SNPs on CsA pharmacokinetics as well as on the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and renal function after kidney transplantation. One hundred seventy-one patients participating in an international, randomized controlled trial were genotyped for CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*1B and the ABCB1 1236 C>T, 2677 G>T/A, and 3435 C>T SNPs. The patients were treated with CsA, mycophenolate mofetil, and glucocorticoids. CsA was dosed to reach predose concentrations (C0) or two hours postdose concentrations (C2). Pharmacokinetic parameters were measured on Days 3 and 10 and Months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after transplantation. Renal function was assessed by measuring serum creatinine and calculating the creatinine clearance. The incidence of BPAR and delayed-graft function was recorded. CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 genotype were not associated with dose-adjusted CsA C0 or C2. The incidence of BPAR in this cohort was 16% and was comparable between the different ABCB1 genotype groups. No significant difference in the incidence of BPAR was found between CYP3A5 expressers (10%) and nonexpressers (18%) (P = 0.24) nor was there a difference in the incidence of BPAR between CYP3A4*1 homozygotes (5%) versus CYP3A4*1B carriers (18%) (P = 0.13). There were no differences with regard to creatinine clearance between the different CYP3A and ABCB1 genotype groups. According to the results, determination of CYP3A and ABCB1 SNPs pretransplantation is not helpful in determining the CsA starting dose and does not aid in predicting the risk of BPAR or worse renal function in an individual patient.

How Delayed Graft Function Impacts Exposure to Mycophenolic Acid in Patients After Renal Transplantation

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) plasma concentrations are highly variable on standard-dose mycophenolate mofetil therapy. At creatinine clearances below 25 mL/min, MPA clearance increases as a result of a higher nonprotein-bound fraction. Patients with delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation are exposed to low total MPA concentrations, when risk of rejection is highest. This study investigated the influence of DGF on MPA exposure and on clinical outcome. Adult renal transplantation patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and either microemulsified cyclosporine (n = 459) or tacrolimus (n = 371) participated in a randomized controlled trial (the Fixed-Dose Concentration-Controlled [FDCC] Study). Abbreviated MPA areas under the curve (AUCs) were obtained on Day 3, Day 10, Week 4, and Month 3, to calculate MPA AUC₀₋₁₂. Free MPA AUC values were available for a subgroup of patients (n = 269). The overall incidence of DGF was 187 of 830 (23%) and did not differ between cyclosporine-treated (24%) and tacrolimus- (21%) treated patients. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months was significantly higher in patients with DGF (13.8% versus 21.4%). Patients with DGF had significantly lower dose-corrected MPA AUC on Day 3 and Day 10. Free MPA fraction and dose-corrected free MPA AUC were significantly higher in patients with DGF, from Day 3 until Month 3. The total number of patients with at least one opportunistic infection was significantly higher in patients with DGF (33.2%) compared with patients without DGF (25.8%) (P = 0.048). Patients with DGF developing opportunistic infections did not have higher total MPA AUC nor higher free MPA AUC compared with those without opportunistic infections. Patients with DGF have significantly lower dose-corrected MPA AUC in the first month after renal transplantation, presumably as a result of enhanced MPA clearance on account of the elevated MPA free fraction. Because patients with DGF have a higher rate of acute rejection and lower MPA exposure, higher dosing of mycophenolate mofetil in such patients may improve outcome. However, the already increased incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with DGF is a concern.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Cyclosporine with Everolimus and Steroids inde novoHeart Transplant Patients: A Multicentre, Randomized Trial

A six-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label study was undertaken to determine whether renal function is improved using reduced-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) versus standard-exposure CsA in 199 de novo heart transplant patients receiving everolimus and steroids ± induction therapy. Mean C2 levels were at the low end of the target range in standard-exposure patients (n = 100) and exceeded target range in reduced-exposure patients (n = 99) throughout the study. Mean serum creatinine at Month 6 (the primary endpoint) was 141.0 ± 53.1 μmol/L in standard-exposure patients versus 130.1 ± 53.7 μmol/L in reduced-exposure patients (P = 0.093). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection ≥3A at Month 6 was 21.0% (21/100) in the standard-exposure group and 16.2% (16/99) in the reduced-exposure group (n.s.). Adverse events and infections were similar between treatment groups. Thus, everolimus with reduced-exposure CsA resulted in comparable efficacy compared to standard-exposure CsA. No renal function benefits were demonstrated; that is possibly related to poor adherence to reduced CsA exposure.

Usefulness of 3-month protocol biopsy of kidney allograft to detect subclinical rejection under triple immunosuppression with basiliximab: a single center experience

Theoretically, an early protocol biopsy (PB) serves to detect subclinical rejection (SCR), allowing early treatment and prevention of acute rejection (AR) and chronic graft injuries. In this retrospective study, we investigated the incidence of biopsy-proven AR (BPAR) and the usefulness of a 3-month PB in detecting SCR in kidney transplant (KT) and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients who received triple immunosuppression and basiliximab. Between January 2007 and September 2009, 116 patients received transplantation (KT=112, SPKT=4). In August 2008, we changed our PB policy and started to collect PB after 3 months instead of a pre-discharge biopsy performed 1month after transplantation. Here we compare the incidence of SCR (defined as Banff grade Ia or higher) between the pre-discharge PB group and the 3-month PB group. PB was obtained from 41 patients before discharge (pre-discharge PB group), and from 49 patients 3 months after transplantation (3-month PB group). Among all recipients, 21 patients were diagnosed with BPAR (estimated incidence of BPAR 20.1%); including 13 (62.0%) diagnosed from 31 to 180 postoperative days (POD), and only 3 (14.3%) within 30 POD. The incidence of BPAR was not different between the two groups (19.5 and 20.8%, respectively); however, 4 of 8 recipients in the 3-month PB group were diagnosed with SCR, compared to none in the pre-discharge PB group (P<0.05). Since the use of triple immunosuppression and basiliximab delayed the onset of AR, we recommend that in order to detect SCR, PB should be obtained 3 months postoperatively.

Can We Eliminate Both Calcineurin Inhibitors and Steroids?

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and steroids, the cornerstone of most immunosuppressive regimens in the past 20 years, have undesirable chronic effects. This has led to the use of new strategies with sirolimus (SRL) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In the SPIESSER study, de novo CNI avoidance and early steroid withdrawal were evaluated in 145 renal recipients randomized to receive either SRL ( n = 71) or cyclosporine (CsA; n = 74). All patients received polyclonal antithymocyte globulin for 5 days, MMF, and steroids withdrawn at 6 months. At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was low (14.3% for SRL vs 8.6% for CsA). At 3 years, renal function (Nankivell) was better in the SRL group, particularly in patients who remained on treatment according to the protocol (71 ± 22 vs 60 ± 17 mL/min; P < .01). Steroids were withdrawn in 70.5% of SRL-treated patients and in 66.7% of CsA-treated patients. In the CONCEPT study, early conversion from CsA to SRL was evaluated in 192 renal recipients prospectively randomized at week 12 to switch from CsA to SRL ( n = 95) or to continue CsA ( n = 97). At 12 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) was significantly higher with SRL (61 ± 16 vs 54 ± 15 mL/min; P = .002, intent-to-treat analysis). The significant improvement in renal function was maintained at 30 months. In both studies graft and patient survival were similar, with better renal function and a tendency for fewer cancers observed at follow-up in patients receiving a maintenance regimen with SRL and MMF. At 30 months, steroids had been withdrawn in 72% of SRL-treated patients and in 70% of CsA-treated patients.

Renal Function, Efficacy, and Safety of Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil After Short-Term Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Quadruple Therapy in De Novo Renal Transplant Patients: One-Year Analysis of a Randomized Multicenter Trial

De novo sirolimus in calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens, although potentially useful to improve early renal function, are complicated by various drug-related side effects. We report a prospective open-label, multicenter, randomized trial to evaluate early conversion from a CsA-based to a sirolimus (SRL)-based regimen 10 to 24 days after renal transplantation. Of the 196 patients, 141 patients with a low-to-moderate immunological risk were eligible to be converted to SRL or to continue CsA. All patients received antithymocyte globulin-F single-bolus induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The primary endpoint, renal function determined by S-creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by Nankivell formula at 12 months was significantly better in the SRL group (1.51+/-0.59 vs. 1.87+/-0.98 mg/dL or 64.5+/-25.2 vs. 53.4+/-18.0 mL/min/1.73 m). Patient survival, graft survival, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection after conversion were not statistically different. Drug discontinuations were significantly higher in the SRL group (36.2% vs. 19.7%). Significantly, more patients in the SRL group reported acne, aphtous, and temporary hyperlipidemia, whereas cytomegalovirus viremia was significantly decreased (7.3% vs. 28.2%). Early conversion to a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen with SRL in combination with mycophenolate mofetil may be a useful strategy to improve renal function. The identification of appropriate candidates and safe management of SRL-related adverse events will be a key to avoid the high rate of dropouts, which currently limit the broad applicability of this protocol.

Acute rejection in low‐toxicity regimens: clinical impact and risk factors in the Symphony study

The Symphony study assessed whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimens containing reduced doses of adjunct immunosuppressants could reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Here, we examined the impact of acute rejection and associated risk factors. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in the low-dose tacrolimus group was approximately half that of the standard-dose cyclosporine and low-dose cyclosporine groups, and a third of that in the low-dose sirolimus group. The low-dose cyclosporine group had more severe rejection episodes (≥grade II) compared with other groups. Acute rejection was associated with a 10 mL/min glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction and a 5.3% absolute increase in graft loss at 12 months. Overall, the highest GFR was found in both rejecters and non-rejecters receiving low-dose tacrolimus, both in an intent-to-treat analysis and in patients successfully treated according to the protocol. In Cox regression models, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches and expanded criteria donors increased the acute rejection risk, while recipient age, living related donor, and MMF dose were associated with a reduced risk. Acute rejection was associated with worse outcome but did not entirely explain the differences among the treatment groups. The 2 g MMF plus low-dose tacrolimus combination appears to be the most efficient of all regimens examined regardless of acute rejection.