Incidence Of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection Research Articles

A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between conversion to mTOR inhibitor and calcineurin inhibitor reduction in managing BK viremia among kidney transplant patients

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) exerts a substantial impact on allograft survival, however, the absence of robust clinical evidence regarding treatment protocols adds to the complexity of managing this condition. This study aimed to compare the two treatment approaches. The study population consisted of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2016 and June 2020 at two tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients diagnosed with BK viremia were evaluated based on their initial viral load and the treatment methods. The ‘Reduction group’ involved dose reduction of tacrolimus while the ‘Conversion group’ included tacrolimus discontinuation and conversion to sirolimus. A total of 175 patients with an initial viral load (iVL) ≥ 3 on the log10 scale were evaluated within two iVL intervals (3–4 and 4–5). In the iVL 4–5 interval, the Reduction group showed potential effectiveness in terms of viral clearance without statistically significant differences. However, within the iVL 3–4 interval, the Reduction group demonstrated superior viral clearance and a lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) than the Conversion group. The renal function over 12 months after BKV diagnosis showed no statistically significant difference. Reducing tacrolimus compared to converting to mTORi would be a more appropriate treatment approach for BK viral clearance in kidney transplantation. Further research is warranted in a large cohort of patients.

Efficacy and safety of single-dose anti-thymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective comparative cohort study.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (BAS) versus a single dose of anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included all pediatric KTRs from May 2013 to April 2018 and followed up to 12 months. In the first period, all recipients received BAS, while from May 2016, a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG was instituted. Maintenance therapy consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor plus prednisone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate. A total of 227 patients were included (BAS, n = 113; r-ATG, n = 114). The main combination of immunosuppressive drugs was tacrolimus, prednisone, and azathioprine in both groups (87% vs. 88%, p = .718). Patients receiving r-ATG showed superior survival-free of the composite endpoint (acute rejection, graft loss, or death; 76% vs. 61%, p = .003; HR 2.08, 1.29-3.34, p = .003) and lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (10% vs. 21%, p = .015). There was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV infection (33% vs. 37%, p = .457), PTLD (1% vs. 3%, p = .309), 30-day hospital readmissions (24% vs. 23%, p = .847), and kidney function at 12 months (86 ± 29 vs. 84 ± 30 mL/min/1.73m2, p = .614). These data suggest that induction therapy with a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG is associated with higher efficacy for preventing acute rejection and similar safety profile compared to BAS.

Sirolimus in combination with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.

Many challenges remain for long-term survival of renal allografts. Once-daily sirolimus (SRL) combined with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus (LER-TAC) may improve medication adherence and reduce the potential nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) compared with standard immunosuppression regimens, thus potentially improving long-term graft survival. This retrospective, observational, single-center, propensity score matching (PSM) study compared conversion to SRL combined with low-dose ER-TAC and mycophenolic acid (MPA) combined with standard-dose TAC in kidney transplant recipients. After PSM, there were 56 patients in each group. Efficacy, safety, and medication adherence were evaluated over 12 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of graft and recipient survival and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (p = 1.000), and none of the recipients developed dnDSA after conversion. The mean eGFR improved in SRL + LER-TAC group after conversion compared to before conversion (51.12 ± 20.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 56.97 ± 19.23 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.05). The medication adherence at 12 months after conversion was superior to before conversion (p = 0.002). Our findings suggest that an immunosuppressive regimen of SRL combined with low-dose ER-TAC is no less effective and safe than standard immunosuppressive regimens for renal transplant recipients and may improve graft renal function and medication adherence.

Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Rejection among Liver Transplant Recipients.

Introduction: Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, with an even higher risk among patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There is limited data evaluating rejection outcomes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after liver transplant. Program evaluation aims: To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, recipient and graft survival, infection, renal dysfunction, and immunosuppression practices. Design: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. To be eligible, patients were deceased donor liver transplant recipients ≥18 year of age transplanted between January 2017 and August 2019 who received steroid-only induction and tacrolimus as part of their initial immunosuppression regimen. Results: Recipients that required renal replacement therapy (N = 86) were compared to those who received no renal replacement therapy (N = 158). Biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant was significantly higher among those requiring renal replacement therapy (36% vs 13%, P < .001). Patient survival at 12 months was 77% for those requiring renal replacement therapy and 94% for those not requiring renal replacement therapy (P < .001). Infection (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8; P < .001), but not rejection (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7; P = .5) was an independent predictor of mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy after liver transplant necessitated careful titration of immunosuppression to balance the detrimental risks of infection versus rejection in this high-risk population.

Evaluation of a Weight-Based Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing Protocol for Kidney Transplant Maintenance Immunosuppression

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of weight-based mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR), this single-center retrospective study of adult KTR compared biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), infections, hospitalizations, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use, and MMF dose changes within one year of transplant pre-and post-implementation of a weight-based MMF dosing protocol. Adult patients who received a kidney transplant at University Health Transplant Institute were reviewed for inclusion. Patients in the weight-based MMF group received 1000 mg twice daily by the first clinic visit if ≥ 80 kg, 750 mg twice daily if 50-79 kg, and 500 mg twice daily if &lt; 50 kg. Patients in the fixed-dose MMF group received MMF 1000 mg twice daily. A total of 170 KTR (50.0% ≥ 80 kg, 44.1% 50-79 kg, 5.9% &lt; 50 kg) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The majority of patients were middle-aged Hispanic males and received lymphocyte-depleting induction therapy. Incidences of BPAR, infection, and hospitalization were similar between both groups at one-year post-transplant. Weight-based MMF dosing is safe and effective in adult KTR.

T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction immunosuppression for liver transplant recipients: a meta-analysis

Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of immunosuppression for liver transplant recipients despite several serious complications including infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension. We attempted to compare the safety and efficacy of T-cell specific antibody induction with complete corticosteroid avoidance. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane central library. Randomized controlled trials comparing T-cell specific antibody induction with corticosteroid induction immunosuppression were included. Our primary outcome was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection. Eleven trials involving 1683 patients were included. The incidence of acute rejection was not significantly different between the antibody and steroid induction groups (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72, 1.01, P = 0.06, I2 = 0%). However, T-cell specific antibody induction significantly reduced the risk of cytomegalovirus infection (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33, 0.70, P = 0.0002, I2 = 3%), HCV recurrence (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80, 0.99, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%), DM (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.32, 0.54, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) and hypertension (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55, 0.90, P = 0.005, I2 = 35%). Trial sequential analysis for acute rejection showed that the cumulative z-curve did not cross the Trial sequential boundary and the required information size was not reached. T-cell specific antibody induction compared to corticosteroid induction seems to significantly reduce opportunistic infections including cytomegalovirus infection and HCV recurrence and metabolic complications including DM and hypertension. However, given the insufficient study power, low quality of evidence, and heterogeneous immunosuppressive regimens, our results should be cautiously appreciated.

The incidence of cytomegalovirus and BK polyomavirus infections in kidney transplant patients receiving mTOR inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infections after kidney transplant have become increasingly prevalent. Based on previous studies, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors seem like attractive alternatives with antiviral activity. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the incidence of CMV and BKPyV infections in kidney transplantation recipients receiving mTOR inhibitors. This meta-analysis included three comparisons of immunosuppressant regimens commonly used after kidney transplantation: Comparison 1: mTOR inhibitors versus calcineurin inhibitors (CNI); Comparison 2: mTOR inhibitors versus antimetabolites (AM); and Comparison 3: mTOR inhibitors plus a reduced-dose of CNI versus AM plus a standard-dose of CNI. The group containing mTOR inhibitors was the study group and the remaining one was the control group. The incidence of CMV or BKPyV infection defined by positive culture, serology, or polymerase chain reaction testing was the primary outcome. A total of 61 studies involving 13,609 patients were included. As compared with the control group, a significantly decreased risk of CMV and BKPyV infections favoring the mTOR inhibitors-based group was shown in comparisons 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.05). Compared with the control group in all three comparisons, mTOR inhibitors made no difference in regard to death and graft loss (p > 0.05). Compared with CNI, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and anemia was higher with mTOR inhibitors (p < 0.05). In comparisons 2 and 3, the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was higher with mTOR inhibitors (p < 0.05). Early introduction of mTOR inhibitors reduced more CMV infections in comparisons 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). The mTOR inhibitor-based regimen is an attractive alternative with lower risk of CMV and BKPyV infections in kidney transplant recipients. The combination regimen is more appropriate and acceptable than the mTOR-inhibitor monotherapy-based regimen. Early introduction of mTOR inhibitors is recommended, although it is worth noting that attention should be paid to wound healing when mTOR inhibitors are introduced early.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conversion from the tacrolimus capsule to tablet in stable liver transplant recipients with maintenance therapy: a 24-week, open-label, single-center, phase IV exploratory clinical study.

The tablet form of tacrolimus is more convenient for drug ingestion than the capsule form. We examined the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus tablets and a satisfaction survey after formula conversion in liver transplant (LT) recipients. This study was an open-label, prospective clinical trial for tacrolimus formula 1:1 conversion from capsule to tablet in 41 adult LT recipients with tacrolimus maintenance therapy of more than 1 month. The primary endpoint was incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) within 24 weeks. Surveys 1 week before and 4 weeks after formula conversion were conducted for total daily dose of medication, number, scale of discomfort and satisfaction. The overall incidence of BPAR was 0% and there was no graft loss or patient death. The incidence of adverse effects was 34.1% (n = 14) after formula conversion. The most common severe adverse effect was abnormal liver function test (n = 5): biliary complications (n = 4) and alcoholic recidivism (n = 1). Total daily dose and number of tacrolimus doses were significantly lower after formula conversion (P < 0.05) without changes in trough level. According to survey analysis, there was no significant difference in discomfort and satisfaction scales from capsule to tablet conversion (P < 0.05). The present study suggests that the new tablet formula can be a useful treatment option to maintain a consistent level of tacrolimus with a lower total daily dose and number in adult LT recipients.

Early calcineurin-inhibitor to belatacept conversion in steroid-free kidney transplant recipients.

Belatacept (Bela) was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular risk that are associated with the chronic use of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney transplant recipients. The use of Bela with early steroid withdrawal (ESW) and simultaneous CNI avoidance has not been formally evaluated. At 3 months post-transplant, stable kidney transplant recipients with ESW on Tacrolimus (Tac) + mycophenolate (MPA) were randomized 1:1:1 to: 1) Bela+MPA, 2) Bela+low-dose Tac (trough goal <5 ng/mL), or 3) continue Tac+MPA. All patients underwent surveillance graft biopsies at enrollment and then at 12, and 24 months post-transplant. Twenty-seven recipients were included; 9 underwent conversion to Bela+MPA, 8 to Bela+low-dose Tac and 10 continued Tac+MPA. Serial blood samples were collected for immune phenotyping and gene expression analyses. The Bela+MPA arm was closed early due to high rate of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR). The incidence of BPAR was 4/9 in Bela+MPA, 0/8 in Bela+low dose Tac and 2/10 in Tac+MPA, P= 0.087. The Bela+low-dose Tac regimen was associated with +8.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 increase in eGFR compared to -0.38 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Tac+MPA, P= 0.243. One graft loss occurred in the Bela+MPA group. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood monocyte count (PBMC) showed that CD28+CD4+ and CD28+CD8+ T cells were higher in Bela+MPA patients with acute rejection compared to patients without rejection, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Our data indicate that, in steroid free regimens, low-dose Tac maintenance is needed to prevent rejection when patients are converted to Bela, at least when the maneuver is done early after transplant.

Impact of antimetabolite discontinuation following cytomegalovirus or BK polyoma virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyoma virus (BKV) infection following kidney transplantation have been associated with allograft dysfunction and allograft loss. Reduction in immunosuppression is a mainstay of management yet has been associated with increased risk of rejection. According to international consensus guidelines, one approach to management of these viral infections is to discontinue the antimetabolite. Little is known surrounding long-term outcomes in these patients, and it remains unclear if consideration should be given to resuming the antimetabolite as variable re-escalation strategies have been reported. The objective was to describe episodes of rejection and identify risk factors for rejection following antimetabolite withdrawal after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients. This single-center, retrospective review evaluated adult kidney transplant recipients with a serum CMV or BKV DNA PCR ≥500 copies/ml who underwent antimetabolite discontinuation. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). One hundred fifty-nine patients were included. Overall, 14 patients (8.8%) experienced BPAR at a median of 1.6 years after antimetabolite discontinuation. Compared to CMV, discontinuation after BKV DNAemia was associated with a higher incidence of BPAR. Characteristics observed more frequently in patients with BPAR included younger age, female sex, higher initial viral load, and development of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA). These findings suggest that antimetabolite discontinuation after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients is a reasonable and safe approach. Further prospective studies investigating optimal immunosuppression management following CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.

Anti-T-Lymphocyte Immunoglobulin (Grafalon) as an Induction Agent for Renal Transplantation: A Real-World, Retrospective, Single-Center Experience.

Polyclonal antithymocyte globulins are widely used in the induction regimens of solid-organ transplant recipients; however, their doses and outcomes remain to be standardized in Indian patients. We report our clinical experience from the real-world use of Grafalon (an anti-T-lymphocyte globulin; ATG-Fresenius) as an induction agentin renal transplant recipients from India. In this retrospective, single- center, observational study, we analyzed the medical records of 177 consecutive, kidney-only transplant recipients who received induction therapy with Grafalon from September 2016 to March 2018 at our center. Incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection and graft dysfunction, immunosuppression protocol, Grafalon dosage, 18-month post-transplant graft and patient survival, treatment-related adverse events, and infective complications were reported. Mean age of patients was 41.46 years (range, 14-68 years), (85% were males). The average dose of Grafalon was 5.81 ± 1.95 mg/kg (range, 2.41 to 10.07 mg/kg). Graft dysfunction (ie, at least 20% increase in serum creatinine from baseline) was observed in 26 patients (14%): 11 patients (6.2%) had biopsy-proven acute rejections, 11 patients (6.2%) had acute tubular necrosis, and 4 patients (2.2%) had calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Seven deaths were recorded: 2 each from fungal pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, and acute coronary syndrome and 1 with urinary tract infection with septicemia. Death-censored graft survival was 100% at 12 months and 98% at 18-month follow-up; overall patient survival was 96%. Infective complications occurred in 40 patients (22.5%), with the most common being urinary tract infection in 32 patients (18%). No malignancies were reported. Use of a potent induction therapy like anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (Grafalon) is often restricted by the risk of side effects and lack of local clinical evidence supporting its role in long-term graft survival. Real-world evidence support the safe and effective use of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin as an induction agent in renal transplant recipients with an individualized dosing approach.

Efficacy and Safety of Antiviral Agents in Preventing Allograft Rejection Following CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Many antiviral agents have been studied in clinical trials for allograft rejection prevention following cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant patients. However, data on the most effective and safest treatment are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to rank CMV prophylaxis agents for allograft rejection prevention following CMV prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant patients according to their efficacy and safety. We conducted searches on the MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL databases, as well as the reference lists of selected studies up to December 2021, for published and peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of CMV prophylaxis agents in high-risk kidney transplant patients. Thirteen studies were independently selected by three reviewers and included post-kidney transplant patients indicated for CMV prophylaxis who had been randomized to receive prophylactic antiviral agents or standard of care. The reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies, and direct and network meta-analyses were applied to assess the study outcomes. The probability of efficacy and safety was evaluated, and the drugs were assigned a numerical ranking. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. The primary outcome was an incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, whereas the secondary outcome was a composite of major adverse drug reactions. Each outcome referred to the definition provided in the original studies. Valganciclovir, valacyclovir, and ganciclovir were identified to significantly decrease the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with pooled risk differences (RDs) of −20.53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = −36.09% to −4.98%), −19.3% (95% CI = −32.7% to −5.93%), and −10.4% (95% CI = −19.7% to −0.12%), respectively. The overall major adverse drug reaction was 5.7% without a significant difference when compared with placebo. Valganciclovir had the best combined efficacy and safety among the examined antiviral agents and was the most effective and safest antiviral agent overall for allograft rejection prevention following CMV prophylaxis. Valacyclovir was the optimal alternative antiviral agent for patients who were unable to tolerate intravenous ganciclovir or access oral valganciclovir as financial problem. However, compliance and dose-related toxicities should be closely monitored.

Efficacy and safety of a switch from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily generic tacrolimus in stable liver transplant patients.

BackgroundOnce-daily tacrolimus reduces non-compliance relative to twice-daily tacrolimus. However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to generic once-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation (LT). Herein, we investigated the efficacy and safety of a switch from twice-daily tacrolimus to generic once-daily tacrolimus in patients with stable liver graft function.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study was conducted in 17 medical centers for 1 year from July 2019 to July 2020 (NCT04069065). Primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) for 24 weeks after conversion. Secondary endpoints were graft failure, patient death, and adverse events (AEs).ResultsOf 151 screened LT patients, 144 patients were enrolled. BPAR, graft failure, and patient death did not occur in this patient population. There were no statistical differences in blood tests, liver function tests, or biochemical tests between visits in any of the patients. Median tacrolimus trough level decreased abruptly from 4.7 ng/mL to 3.2 ng/mL after generic once-daily tacrolimus conversion, but median tacrolimus dose increased due to low tacrolimus trough level. Ninety-two adverse events occurred in 54 patients. Liver enzyme levels increased in seven patients (4.9%) after the switch to generic once-daily tacrolimus, but the liver function tests of these patients normalized thereafter. There were three cases of severe AEs not related to investigational drug.ConclusionsPresent study suggests that conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to generic once-daily tacrolimus is effective and safe in stable LT patients.

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplants from Older/Marginal Donors: A Cohort Study

Introduction: To safely expand the donor pool, we introduced a strategy of biopsy-guided selection and allocation to single or dual transplantation of kidneys from donors >60 years old or with hypertension, diabetes, and/or proteinuria (older/marginal donors). Here, we evaluated the long-term performance of this approach in everyday clinical practice. Methods: In this single-center cohort study, we compared outcomes of 98 patients who received one or two biopsy-evaluated grafts from older/marginal donors (“recipients”) and 198 patients who received nonhistologically assessed single graft from ideal donors (“reference-recipients”) from October 2004 to December 2015 at the Bergamo Transplant Center (Italy). Results: Older/marginal donors and their recipients were 27.9 and 19.3 years older than ideal donors and their reference-recipients, respectively. KDPI/KDRI and donor serum creatinine were higher and cold ischemia time longer in the recipient group. During a median follow-up of 51.9 (interquartile range 23.1–88.6) months, 11.2% of recipients died, 7.1% lost their graft, and 16.3% had biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) versus 3.5, 7.6, and 17.7%, respectively, of reference-recipients. Overall death-censored graft failure (rate ratio 0.78 [95% CI 0.33–2.08]), 5-year death-censored graft survival (94.3% [87.8–100.0] vs. 94.2% [90.5–98.0]), BPAR incidence (rate ratio 0.87 [0.49–1.62]), and yearly measured glomerular filtration rate decline (1.18 ± 3.27 vs. 0.68 ± 2.42 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.37) were similar between recipients and reference-recipients, respectively. Conclusions: Biopsy-guided selection and allocation of kidneys from older/marginal donors can safely increase transplant activity in clinical practice without affecting long-term outcomes. This may help manage the growing gap between organ demand and supply without affecting long-term recipient and graft outcomes.

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in the Elderly Recipients.

Introduction:In a developing country with a predominantly young population, the valid assumption is directed toward medical care toward the young. However, as medical technology has advanced, quality care has ensured better survival for the elderly population also. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing kidney transplantation.Materials and Methods:A retrospective analysis of 1150 patients who had undergone live related renal transplantation was done from January 2006 to December 2014. These patients were divided into two groups; Group 1: age >60 years (N = 150), Group 2: age 18–60 years (N = 1000). The clinical outcomes were compared.Results:The mean age in Group 1 was 69 ± 7.5 years (SD ± 7.5), and group 2 was 41 ± 8 years. In groups 1 and 2, males were 80% and 82%; death censored graft survival at 5 years was 82% and 87%; patient survival at 5 years was 86% and 94%, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was similar in both groups (11.3 vs. 10.2%, P = 0.12). Urinary tract infection was the most common infectious complication. Sepsis was the primary cause of death in both groups.Conclusion:In the elderly patients who underwent kidney transplantation, satisfactory graft function, and patient survival were maintained over a period of 60 months. Urinary tract infections were common, and sepsis was the most common cause of death with a surviving allograft. The acute rejection and mortality rates were comparable to the literature published from India so far.

FKBP-CaN-NFAT pathway polymorphisms selected by in silico biological function prediction are associated with tacrolimus efficacy in renal transplant patients

AimThe aim of the present study was to investigate the potential effects of genetic variations in the FKBP-CaN-NFAT pathway on clinical events associated with tacrolimus efficacy in Chinese renal transplant patients. MethodsOne hundred and forty Chinese renal transplant patients of Han ethnicity with over five years of follow-up were enrolled in our study. A pool of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (1284 SNPs) was extracted from the Ensembl database according to chromosomal regions of the candidate genes. Next, 109 SNPs were screened out from this pool using multiple bioinformatics tools for subsequent genotyping using the MALDI-TOF-MS method. The associations of these candidate SNPs with acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, pneumonia and post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were explored. ResultsFourty-four SNPs were found to be associated with tacrolimus-related clinical drug response. Specifically, eight SNPs were associated with the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, four SNPs were associated with the rate of nephrotoxicity, 16 SNPs were correlated with the onset of pneumonia, and 26 SNPs were found to significantly influence post-transplant eGFR trend. An elaborate scoring system was implemented to prioritize the validation of these potentially causal SNPs. In particular, NFATC2 rs150348438 (G>T) performed well during integrative scoring (Ptotal=23.8) and was significantly associated with the occurrence of pneumonia (P = 0.0035, HR=0.91, 95% CI=0.85–0.97) and post-transplant eGFR levels (P = 0.000003). ConclusionsNFATC2 rs150348438, rs6013219, rs1052653, and NFATC1 rs754093, ranking high in scoring, significantly affected the post-transplant eGFR and the incidence of pneumonia, acute rejection, and nephrotoxicity in renal transplant patients taking tacrolimus. Those SNPs may alter the expression and regulation of FKBP-CaN-NFAT pathway by influencing transcription regulation, mature mRNA degradation and RNA splicing, or protein coding. Critical SNPs of high ranking may serve as PD-associated pharmacogenetic biomarkers indicating individual response variability of TAC, and thus aid the clinical management of renal transplant patients.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF EVEROLIMUS IN KOREAN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE, OPEN LABEL, MULTICENTER, SINGLE ARM TRIAL

Purpose: This research was planned as a part of regulatory post marketing surveillance according to the Standard for Re-examination of New Drugs to reconfirm the safety and efficacy of everolimus (Certican®) combined with reduced Cyclosporine A (CsA) after renal transplantation, by investigating incidence of any serious adverse event and adverse event early (12 weeks) after administration. Methods: This study involving 4 centers in Korea was performed from 17 Mar 2012 to 8 Oct 2013. In this prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm study, 54 patients were followed up for 12 weeks after administration of the study drug. The concentration of everolimus was adjusted to be 3-8 ng/ml. The concentration of CsA was adjusted to be 100-200 ng/ml till 4 weeks after then to be 75-150 ng/ml. The primary endpoints was incidence of serious adverse events and secondary endpoints was incidence of adverse events, presence or absence of acute rejection, and renal function were measured. Results: Of 54 patients enrolled in the study, 1 patient (consent withdrawal) and 4 patients (other reasons) were withdrawn and 49 in total completed the study. The subjects of Intention to treat (ITT) analysis were 52. Forty nine (94.23%) of 52 patients reported 165 adverse events during the study period. The overall incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection within 12 weeks after transplantation was 4 patients (7.69 %). A total of 17 serious adverse events were reported in 12 patients (23.08 %). The most frequent of serious adverse events were Urinary tract infection, Blood creatinine increased, Lymphocele (3.85 %) followed by Bronchopneumonia (1.92 %), Gastritis, Nephropathy toxic, Oliguria, Renal necrosis, Renal tubular disorder, Cerebral infarction, Convulsion, Compression fracture, and Transplant rejection (1.92 %). Of 17 serious adverse events reported this time, 5 cases (29.41 %) were serious adverse drug reactions whose causality to the study drug could not be ruled out. The most frequent serious adverse drug reactions was Lymphocele (3.85 %) (Table 1). The analysis of renal function in the ITT set showed mean e-GRF was 7.51 ± 3.06 mL/min/1.73m2 at Visit 1 (before transplantation), 71.66 ± 23.81 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Visit 3 (1 week), 70.54 ± 20.33 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Visit 4 (4 weeks) and 66.76 ± 18.08 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Visit 5 (12 weeks). Renal function (e-GFR) was decreased by 6.74 ± 20.27 mL/min/1.73 m2 with statistically significant difference (p=0.0242) at Visit 5 from Visit 3. Conclusions: Compared with previous literature reports, there was no clinically significant finding in terms of safety and efficacy in this study. And further follow-up evaluation for renal function would be needed because it was not enough follow-up periods to get conclusion.

Assessment of Mycophenolic Acid Levels on Biopsy Proven Rejection and Adverse Effects in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients

Therapeutic ranges of Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) concentrations have not been established in pediatric heart transplant recipients. There are limited data supporting are under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in adult heart transplant on outcomes such as rejection, but AUC monitoring may be not be feasible in clinical practice. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough levels and incidence of biopsy proven rejection and adverse effects in pediatric heart transplant patients. A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients receiving heart transplant between Jan 2011 and Dec 2015. Patients included for analysis were ≤18 years at transplant and received maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and a corticosteroid. Endomyocardial biopsy grades up to one-year post transplant and simultaneous MPA levels were recorded. Patients with acute cellular rejection scores of 2R or 3R or immunopathologic evidence of antibody mediated rejection were considered as biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR). Leukopenia, gastrointestinal side effects, and mycophenolate dose decreases were also recorded. A total of 47 patients were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between patients who had BPAR and those who did not. Overall 24% of patients had at least 1 incidence of BPAR after heart transplant. The mean MPA trough levels between the group of patients with rejection (2.4 ug/mL +/- 1.62) and those without rejection (2.46 ug/mL +/- 1.74) was not significantly different (p=0.38). Mean MPA trough levels also were also not consistent when examining rejection by time from transplant. Only examining by individual MPA trough levels on biopsy days did we observe a significantly lower MPA trough 1.6 ug/mL +/- 1.05 in those with rejection versus those without 2.5 ug/mL +/- 1.69 (p=0.02). The mean MPA level associated with a dose decrease due to an adverse effect between these two groups was not significant. MPA trough levels may have a relationship with incidence of biopsy proven rejection or with incidence of adverse events within one-year post transplant in this population. Controlled prospective studies with are warranted to further evaluate this potential relationship.

Immunological risk stratification and tailored minimisation of immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of minimisation of immunosuppression including early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients treated with Basiliximab induction remains unclear.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study reports the outcomes from 298 consecutive renal transplants performed since 1st July 2010–June 2013 treated with Basiliximab induction and early steroid withdrawal in low immunological risk patients using a simple immunological risk stratification and 3-month protocol biopsy to optimise therapy. The cohort comprised 225 low-risk patients (first transplant or HLA antibody calculated reaction frequency (CRF ≤50% with no donor specific HLA antibodies) who underwent basiliximab induction, steroid withdrawal on day 7 and maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and 73 high-risk patients who received tacrolimus, MMF and prednisolone for the first 3 months followed by long term maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and prednisolone. High-risk patients not undergoing 3-month protocol biopsy were continued on triple immunosuppression.ResultsSteroid withdrawal could be safely achieved in low immunological risk recipients with IL2 receptor antibody induction. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 15.1% in the low-risk and 13.9% in the high-risk group (including sub-clinical rejection detected at protocol biopsy). One- year graft survival was 93.3% and patient survival 98.5% in the low-risk group, and 97.3 and 100% respectively in the high-risk group. Graft function was similar in each group at 1 year (mean eGFR 61.2 ± 23.4 mL/min low-risk and 64.6 ± 19.2 mL/min high-risk).ConclusionsImmunosuppression regimen comprising basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, MMF and prednisolone with early steroid withdrawal in low risk patients and MMF withdrawal in high risk patients following a normal 3-month protocol biopsy is effective in limiting acute rejection episodes and produces excellent rates of patient survival, graft function and complications.

Clinical Study of Standard- vs Reduced-Dose Tacrolimus Combined With Generic Mycophenolate Mofetil in De Novo Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BackgroundThe lowering of calcineurin inhibitor exposure is possibly considered as the proper strategy to prevent calcineurin inhibitor–induced nephrotoxicity in kidney transplant. This clinical study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of reduced-dose tacrolimus with standard-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs standard-dose tacrolimus with reduced-dose MMF. MethodsA prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, and parallel-group clinical trial was conducted at 4 transplant centers in Korea. A total sample size was 108, and eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either reduced-dose tacrolimus with standard-dose MMF (the study group) or standard-dose tacrolimus with reduced-dose MMF (the control group) for 6 months in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Graft function, the incidence of efficacy failure, and adverse events were compared. ResultsThe mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 6 months post-transplantation was 69.83 ± 16.68 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the study group and 69.92 ± 17.55 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the control group (P > .05). The overall incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 3.64% (n = 2) in the study group, compared to 3.77% (n = 2) in the control group (P > .05). There was no graft loss, death, or loss of follow-up in either group. ConclusionIn conclusion, the results suggest that tacrolimus minimization with standard-dose MMF provides adequate immunosuppression with proper renal function and similar rate of incidence of acute rejection compared with the regimen including standard-dose tacrolimus with reduced-dose MMF.