Activation Of Raf-1 Research Articles

15-Deoxy-Δ-12,14-Prostaglandin J2 Represses Immune Escape of Lung Adenocarcinoma by Polarizing Macrophages Through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Ras/Raf Pathway.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a widespread and deadly form of cancer. Prostaglandin 15-deoxy-Δ-12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties. However, it is unclear whether this effect on LUAD progression stems from its ability to influence macrophage polarization. By utilizing 3- (4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), flow cytometry, colony formation, transwell assays, and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we investigated how 15d-PGJ2 affects A549 cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion, as well as levels of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and IL-17. Human monocytic cell line THP-1 was induced into M2 macrophages using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and IL-4/IL-13, followed by treatment with 15d-PGJ2. The study employed flow cytometry to observe the polarization of macrophages, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, western blot for identifying expression of macrophage marker proteins, and examining EGFR/rat sarcoma (Ras)/rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (Raf) activation. In a coculture setup, CD8+ T cells were shown to have a proliferation capacity by carboxifluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE), a killing ability by lactate dehydrogenase, and an analysis of their interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha levels by ELISA. 15d-PGJ2 reduced invasion capacity and expression of inflammatory cytokines, lowered A549 cell viability in a dose-dependent way, and promoted apoptosis. 15d-PGJ2 facilitated the transition of M2 macrophages to the M1 type, inhibited Ras/Raf pathway activation, reduced EGFR expression in macrophages, and stimulated CD8+ T cells to enhance anti-tumor immunity. 15d-PGJ2 repressed M2 macrophage polarization and LUAD immune evasion by targeting the EGFR/Ras/Raf pathway in macrophages.

Hypoxia increases methylated histones to prevent histone clipping and heterochromatin redistribution during Raf-induced senescence.

Hypoxia enhances histone methylation by inhibiting oxygen- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent demethylases, resulting in increased methylated histones. This study reveals how hypoxia-induced methylation affects histone clipping and the reorganization of heterochromatin into senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF) during oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) in IMR90 human fibroblasts. Notably, using top-down proteomics, we discovered specific cleavage sites targeted by Cathepsin L (CTSL) in H3, H2B and H4 during Raf activation, identifying novel sites in H2B and H4. Hypoxia counteracts CTSL-mediated histone clipping by promoting methylation without affecting CTSL's activity. This increase in methylation under hypoxia protects against clipping, reshaping the epigenetic landscape and influencing chromatin accessibility, as shown by ATAC-seq analysis. These insights underscore the pivotal role of hypoxia-induced histone methylation in protecting chromatin from significant epigenetic shifts during cellular aging.

Abstract IA018: Pan-RAF-MEK molecular glue NST-628 is a potent and brain-penetrant inhibitor of the RAS-MAPK pathway

Abstract Alterations in the RAS-MAPK signaling cascade are common across multiple solid tumor types and is a driver for many cancers. NST-628 is a potent pan-RAF-MEK molecular glue that prevents phosphorylation and activation of MEK by RAF, overcoming the limitations of traditional RAS-MAPK inhibitors and leading to deep durable inhibition of the pathway. Cellular, biochemical, and structural analysis of RAF-MEK complexes show that NST-628 engages all isoforms of RAF, including ARAF, and prevents the formation of BRAF-CRAF heterodimers, a differentiated mechanism from all current RAF inhibitors. With a potent and durable inhibition of the RAF-MEK signaling complex as well as high intrinsic permeability into the brain, NST-628 demonstrates broad efficacy in cellular and patient-derived tumor models harboring diverse MAPK pathway alterations, including orthotopic intracranial models. Given a mechanism differentiated from previous therapies targeting RAF or MEK catalytic activity, NST-628 is positioned to make an impact clinically in an areas of unmet patient need. Citation Format: Klaus P. Hoeflich. Pan-RAF-MEK molecular glue NST-628 is a potent and brain-penetrant inhibitor of the RAS-MAPK pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Optimizing Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability through Cancer Chemistry; 2024 Dec 9-11; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(12_Suppl):Abstract nr IA018.

PDE4D drives rewiring of the MAPK pathway in BRAF-mutated melanoma resistant to MAPK inhibitors

BackgroundPhosphodiesterase type 4D (PDE4D) breaks down cyclic AMP (cAMP) reducing the signaling of this intracellular second messenger which plays a major role in melanocyte pathophysiology. In advanced melanoma, expression of PDE4D is increased, plays a role in tumor invasion and is negatively associated with survival. In the current work, we investigated the role of PDE4D in the resistance of BRAF-mutated melanoma to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway-targeted therapy.MethodsEstablished human melanoma cell line sensitive and resistant to BRAF and MEK inhibitors and tumor tissues from melanoma patients were used in this study. Immunoblotting was used to analyze protein expression and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR was used to analyze mRNA expression. DNA methylation analysis was evaluated via bisulfite treatment followed by quantitative PCR. Cell viability was measured by clonogenic assays or spheroid cultures. Cell xenograft experiments in immunodeficient mice were used to validate the results in vivo.ResultsAnalysis of baseline tumors from patients with BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma treated with MAPK inhibitors showed that higher PDE4D expression in situ predicted worse survival in patients. Furthermore, acquired resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with overexpression of PDE4D in situ and ex vivo. The overexpression of the PDE4D5 isoform in melanoma cells resistant to targeted therapies was explained by demethylation or deletion of a CpG island located upstream of the PDE4D5 promoter. We further showed that PDE4D overexpression allowed RAF1 activation, promoting a switch from BRAF to RAF1 isoform in BRAF-mutated melanoma, favoring resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors. As a result, pharmacological inhibition of PDE4 activity impeded the proliferation of resistant cells ex vivo and in vivo. The anti-tumorigenic activity of PDE4 inhibitor was achieved via inhibition of the Hippo pathway which plays an important role in resistance to targeted therapies.ConclusionsIn summary, our research showed that PDE4D drives rewiring of the MAPK pathway in BRAF-mutated melanoma resistant to MAPK inhibitors and suggests that PDE4 inhibition is a novel therapeutic option for treatment of BRAF-mutated melanoma patients.

MEK Inhibitors Lead to PDGFR Pathway Upregulation and Sensitize Tumors to RAF Dimer Inhibitors in NF1-Deficient Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a highly aggressive subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma with a high propensity to metastasize and extremely limited treatment options. Loss of the RAS-GAP NF1 leads to sustained RAF/MEK/ERK signaling in MPNST. However, single-agent MEK inhibitors (MEKi) have failed to elicit a sustained inhibition of the MAPK signaling pathway in MPNST. We used pharmacological, biochemical, and genetic perturbations of the receptor tyrosine kinase and MAPK signaling pathway regulators to investigate the mechanisms of MEKi resistance and evaluated combination therapeutic strategies in various preclinical MPNST models in vitro and in vivo. Here, we report that MEKi treatment resistance in MPNST involves two adaptive pathways: direct transcriptional upregulation of the receptor tyrosine kinase PDGFRβ and MEKi-induced increase in RAF dimer formation and activation of downstream signaling. Although the pharmacologic combination of a MEKi with a PDGFRβ-specific inhibitor was more effective than treatment with the MEKi alone, the combination of the MEKi and RAF dimer inhibitors led to a robust inhibition of MAPK pathway signaling. This combination treatment was effective in vitro and in vivo, as demonstrated by the significant increase in drug synergism and its high effectiveness in decreasing MPNST viability. Our findings suggest that the combination of MEKis and PDGFR and/or RAF dimer inhibitors can overcome MEKi resistance and may serve as a novel targeted therapeutic strategy for patients with NF1-deficient MPNST, which in turn could impact future clinical investigations for this patient population.

Sterigmatocystin declines mouse oocyte quality by inducing ferroptosis and asymmetric division defects

BackgroundSterigmatocystin (STE) is a mycotoxin widely found in contaminated food and foodstuffs, and excessive long-term exposure to STE is associated with several health issues, including infertility. However, there is little information available regarding the effects of STE toxin on the female reproductive system, particularly concerning oocyte maturation.MethodsIn the present study, we investigated the toxic effects of STE on mouse oocyte maturation. We also used Western blot, immunofluorescence, and image quantification analyses to assess the impact of STE exposure on the oocyte maturation progression, mitochondrial distribution, oxidative stress, DNA damages, oocyte ferroptosis and asymmetric division defects.ResultsOur results revealed that STE exposure disrupted mouse oocyte maturation progression. When we examined the cellular changes following 100 µM STE treatment, we found that STE adversely affected polar body extrusion and induced asymmetric division defects in oocytes. RNA-sequencing data showed that STE exposure affects the expression of several pathway-correlated genes during oocyte meiosis in mice, suggesting its toxicity to oocytes. Based on the RNA-seq data, we showed that STE exposure induced oxidative stress and caused DNA damage in oocytes. Besides, ferroptosis and α-tubulin acetylation were also found in STE-exposed oocytes. Moreover, we determined that STE exposure resulted in reduced RAF1 protein expression in mouse oocytes, and inhibition of RAF1 activity also causes defects in asymmetric division of mouse oocytes.ConclusionsCollectively, our research provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms whereby STE contributes to abnormal meiosis.

Effector Binding Sequentially Alters KRAS Dimerization on the Membrane: New Insights Into RAS-Mediated RAF Activation.

RAS proteins are peripheral membrane GTPases that activate multiple downstream effectors for cell proliferation and differentiation. The formation of a signaling RAS-RAF complex at the plasma membrane is implicated in a quarter of all human cancers; however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this work, nanodisc platforms and paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) analyses to determine the structure of a hetero-tetrameric complex comprising KRAS and the RAS-binding domain (RBD) and cysteine-rich domain (CRD) of activated RAF1 are employed. The binding of the RBD or RBD-CRD differentially alters the dimerization modes of KRAS on both anionic and neutral membranes, validated by interface-specific mutagenesis. Notably, the RBD binding allosterically generated two distinct KRAS dimer interfaces in equilibrium, favored by KRAS free and in complex with the RBD-CRD, respectively. Additional interactions of the CRD with both KRAS protomers are mutually cooperative to stabilize a new dimer configuration of KRAS bound to the RBD-CRD. The RAF binding sequentially alters KRAS dimerization, providing new insights into RAF activation, including a configurational transition of the KRAS dimer to provide an interaction site for the CRD and release the autoinhibited RAF complex. These methods are applicable to many other signaling protein complexes on the membrane.

RAF1 facilitates KIT signaling and serves as a potential treatment target for gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

The aberrant activation of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling is important for KIT mutation-mediated tumorigenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In this study, we found that inhibition of RAF1 suppresses the activation of both wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutations in GIST, with primary KIT mutations showing greater sensitivity. This suggests a positive feedback loop between KIT and RAF1, wherein RAF1 facilitates KIT signaling. We further demonstrated that RAF1 associates with KIT and the kinase activity of RAF1 is necessary for its contribution to KIT activation. Accordingly, inhibition of RAF1 suppressed cell survival, proliferation, and cell cycle progression in vitro mediated by both wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutations. Inhibition of RAF1 in vivo suppressed GIST growth in a transgenic mouse model carrying germline KIT/V558A mutation, showing a similar treatment efficiency as imatinib, the first-line targeted therapeutic drug of GIST, while the combination use of imatinib and RAF1 inhibitor further suppressed tumor growth. Acquisition of drug-resistant secondary mutation of KIT is a major cause of treatment failure of GIST following targeted therapy. Like wild-type KIT and primary KIT mutations, inhibition of RAF1 suppressed the activation of secondary KIT mutation, and the cell survival, proliferation, cell cycle progression in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo mediated by secondary KIT mutation. However, the activation of secondary KIT mutation is less dependent on RAF1 compared with that of primary KIT mutations. Taken together, our results revealed that RAF1 facilitates KIT signaling and KIT mutation-mediated tumorigenesis of GIST, providing a rationale for further investigation into the use of RAF1 inhibitors alone or in combination with KIT inhibitor in the treatment of GIST, particularly in cases resistant to KIT inhibitors.

Reconstitution and characterization of BRAF in complex with 14-3-3 and KRAS4B on nanodiscs.

RAF kinases are key components of the RAS-MAPK signaling pathway, which drives cell growth and is frequently overactivated in cancer. Upstream signaling activates the small GTPase RAS, which recruits RAF to the cell membrane, driving a transition of the latter from an auto-inhibited monomeric conformation to an active dimer. Despite recent progress, mechanistic details underlying RAF activation remain unclear, particularly the role of RAS and the membrane in mediating this conformational rearrangement of RAF together with 14-3-3 to permit RAF kinase domain dimerization. Here, we reconstituted an active complex of dimeric BRAF, a 14-3-3 dimer and two KRAS4B on a nanodisc bilayer and verified that its assembly is GTP-dependent. Biolayer interferometry (BLI) was used to compare the binding affinities of monomeric versus dimeric full-length BRAF:14-3-3 complexes for KRAS4B-conjugated nanodiscs (RAS-ND) and to investigate the effects of membrane lipid composition and spatial density of KRAS4B on binding. 1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine (DOPS) and higher KRAS4B density enhanced the interaction of BRAF:14-3-3 with RAS-ND to different degrees depending on BRAF oligomeric state. We utilized our reconstituted system to dissect the effects of KRAS4B and the membrane on the kinase activity of monomeric and dimeric BRAF:14-3-3 complexes, finding that KRAS4B or nanodiscs alone were insufficient to stimulate activity, whereas RAS-ND increased activity of both states of BRAF. The reconstituted assembly of full-length BRAF with 14-3-3 and KRAS on a cell-free, defined lipid bilayer offers a more holistic biophysical perspective to probe regulation of this multimeric signaling complex at the membrane surface.

Abstract 4704: Biochemical and cell-based assay platforms for development of RAF inhibitors against human cancers

Abstract The RAF protein kinases are key intermediates in cellular signal transduction, functioning as direct effectors of the RAS GTPases and as the initiating kinases in the ERK cascade. In human cancer, RAF activity is frequently dysregulated due to mutations in the RAF family members (ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF) or to alterations in upstream RAF regulators, including RAS and receptor tyrosine kinases. The first and second generations of RAF inhibitors have yielded dramatic responses in malignant melanomas containing BRAF mutations; however, their overall usefulness has been limited by both intrinsic and acquired drug resistance. In addition, cancers with hyperactive RAS exhibit intrinsic resistance to these drugs. In particular, issues related to the dimerization of the RAF kinases can impact the efficacy of these compounds and are a primary cause of drug resistance. We have established biochemical HotSpotTM kinase assay, NanoBRETTM and NanoBITTM cell assay platforms for High Through Screening of kinase inhibitors. Here, we demonstrate that the 3rd generation of pan-RAF inhibitors LY3009120, LXH254, and Belvarafenib inhibit ARAF, BRAF, CRAF, BRAF(V600E), and CRAF(R391W) kinase activity in biochemical HotSpotTM assay. Our NanoBRETTM target engagement and NanoBITTM cellular assay data show that LY3009120, LXH254, and Belvarafenib bind to KRAS(G12C) primed BRAF and CRAF, and block BRAF and CRAF dimerization. Furthermore, our results show these inhibitors can block the downstream ERK phosphorylation in cellular HTRF assay and induce caspase-3/7 activation in Western blot assay in the triple negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Taken together, our results indicate the biochemical HotSpotTM kinase activity assay, and NanoBRETTM target engagement and NanoBITTM cellular assays can serve as great platforms to facilitate RAF drug discovery against human cancers. Citation Format: Jianghong Wu, Yong Wan, Shuguang Liang, Peter Gallagher, Li Liang, Christian Loch, Haiching Ma. Biochemical and cell-based assay platforms for development of RAF inhibitors against human cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4704.

Abstract 296: BRAFi-induced ROCK-mediated non-canonical nuclear β-catenin shuttling drives a phenotypic switch in cancer-associated fibroblasts

Abstract The discovery of BRAF mutations in around 60% of melanoma patients and the subsequent development of targeted inhibitors to counter the hyperactive BRAF-driven pro-tumorigenic signaling pathway have marked a significant milestone in melanoma therapy. However, despite this progress, the long-term outcomes remain unsatisfactory for many patients due to the occurrence of drug resistance. We previously reported that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are stimulated by BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) to drive matrix remodeling and therapeutic escape pathways in melanoma cells. However, the underlying mechanism by which CAFs are reprogrammed by BRAFi to obtain enhanced phenotypes remains elusive. Here, we present compelling evidence showing that BRAFi (PLX4032), but not CRAF inhibitor (GW5074) or pan-RAF inhibitor (RAF709), induces the accumulation of nuclear β-catenin in CAFs harboring wild-type BRAF, a process mediated by BRAF and CRAF but not ARAF isoform. BRAFi binding to BRAF and CRAF leads to robust RAF kinase dimerization, including BRAF and CRAF homodimer and BRAF: CRAF heterodimer. RAF dimers are subsequently recruited to the plasma membrane, where BRAF and CRAF are phosphorylated on residues Thr599 and Ser338, respectively, and activated in a RAS-GTP-dependent manner. RAF activation stimulates the downstream Rho kinase (ROCK) and MEK/ERK signaling pathways simultaneously. Notably, ablating RAS and RAF isoforms effectively suppressed BRAFi-induced activation of ROCK1/2 signaling in CAFs, further confirming that the ROCK pathway is a downstream effector of BRAFi-driven RAF activation and is intricately linked to increased nuclear β-catenin in CAFs. The pharmacological blockade of ROCK activity, using HA-1077, diminished BRAFi-induced nuclear β-catenin accumulation in CAFs, suggesting BRAFi-driven cytoskeletal remodeling plays a pivotal role in the nuclear shuttling of β-catenin. Using a mouse model that mimics human BRAF-mutant melanoma, we found that elevated level of nuclear β-catenin drives the conversion of fibroblasts into α-SMA-positive CAFs, leading to elevated collagen deposition and contributing to melanoma progression in vivo. In summary, BRAFi reprograms the transcriptional activity in CAFs by driving increased nuclear β-catenin to increase their ability to remodel the tumor ECM and promote melanoma cell proliferation. Collectively, the data offer new insights into the molecular mechanisms that underlie the paradoxical reprogramming of CAFs by BRAFi in melanoma therapy through the non-canonical β-catenin pathway. Citation Format: Bruna da Silva Soley, Radhika Athalye, Ryan Zhang, Thomas Andl, Yuhang Zhang. BRAFi-induced ROCK-mediated non-canonical nuclear β-catenin shuttling drives a phenotypic switch in cancer-associated fibroblasts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 296.

Abstract 619: Comprehensive cell line profiling of monomer- and dimer-selective small molecule RAF inhibitors uncovers determinants of cellular responses

Abstract Dysregulation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway is a frequent event in many cancers. The RAF family of kinases, which includes ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF (RAF1), plays a key role in MAPK signaling. Of the three isoforms, only BRAF is currently targeted by approved RAF inhibitors. These inhibitors were designed to target BRAF-mutant variants that act as oncogenic monomers. However, BRAF-monomer inhibitors can induce activation of wild-type RAF by the formation of dimers, resulting in hyperproliferative lesions of BRAF wild-type cells. Additionally, BRAF-monomer inhibitors do not target RAF-dimers, although this is a potential vulnerability of many MAPK-driven cancers. Novel inhibitors are in development to circumvent these limitations. Further insights into the precise targeting and mechanism of action of RAF inhibitors can help in determining the most promising avenues for drug development. We performed extensive cellular profiling experiments with three approved and five clinical stage inhibitors of RAF to gain more insight into the differences and cellular targeting of these agents. The inhibitors were tested in cell viability assays on a panel of 130 human cancer cell lines from diverse tissue origins. Cell lines were exposed to dose ranges of each inhibitor spanning four logarithmic orders, and viability was determined by measurement of intracellular ATP. Effects of compound on cell viability were related to genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic status using bioinformatics, with the aim to identify predictive biomarkers for drug response, and to determine selective targeting of MAPK-driven cell lines. Additionally, the primary mechanism of cellular inhibitor activity was determined by relating cell line responses to gene dependency data from large CRISPR knockout screens. Our results showed striking similarity in the overall inhibitory profile of BRAF-monomer inhibitors and the vemurafenib-derivative and paradox breaker plixorafenib, which all selectively targeted BRAF-mutant cell lines. However, whereas vemurafenib increased cell viability in RAS-mutant cell lines at high drug concentrations, this effect was greatly reduced for plixorafenib. Western blot analysis of phosphorylated MEK and ERK levels in RAS-mutant cell lines treated with BRAF-monomer inhibitors confirmed MAPK pathway activation as cause of the increased cell viability. In addition, RAF-dimer inhibitors potently targeted BRAF-mutant cell lines, as well as several KRAS- and NRAS-mutant cell lines. Lastly, correlation analyses of cell line profiling data with CRISPR knockout data revealed the preferential targeting of RAF1-dependent cell lines by the dual RAF/MEK inhibitor avutometinib. The results of our analyses shed light on the intricacies of cellular targeting by RAF inhibitors and provide insights to guide the development of new RAF inhibitors. Citation Format: Jeffrey J. Kooijman, Awan Al Koerdi, Sjoerd B. van der Leeuw, Daphne J. Kluitmans, Esmee van den Bossche, Jelle Dylus, Jeroen A. de Roos, Janneke J. Melis, Nicole Willemsen-Seegers, Guido J. Zaman. Comprehensive cell line profiling of monomer- and dimer-selective small molecule RAF inhibitors uncovers determinants of cellular responses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 619.

Abstract 1925: Wild-type RAS signaling is an essential therapeutic target in RAS-mutated cancers

Abstract Single-agent targeting of RAS-mutated cancers using RAF/MEK/ERK or PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors is ineffective; blocking one pathway relieves negative feedback control of RTK signaling and hyperactivates parallel effector pathways. While combined MEK and PI3K inhibition is effective in preclinical models, toxicity of this combination prevents its clinical use. Alternative strategies for treating RAS-mutated cancers are essential. Therapeutics directly targeting mutated RAS proteins have the potential to spare normal cellular function thereby lessening overall toxicity. Unfortunately, direct RAS inhibition as a monotherapy does not fully block RAS effector signaling. RAS proteins show differential activation of RAF and PI3K pathways: KRAS potently activates RAF but poorly activates PI3K, whereas HRAS effectively activates PI3K but poorly activates RAF. Further, mutant RAS inhibition relieves negative feedback controls leading to rapid hyperactivation of RTK−WT RAS signaling. A more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between mutant RAS and RTK−WT RAS signaling is essential to developing rational therapeutic approaches to treat RAS-mutated cancers. We found that WT RAS enhanced mutant RAS-driven transformation by activating RAS effectors poorly engaged by mutated RAS. Further, inhibition of RAS effectors activated poorly by mutant RAS synergized with and limited resistance to mutant HRAS and KRAS inhibitors. The mutant HRAS inhibitor tipifarnib blocked PI3K signaling and synergized with MEK inhibitors in HRAS-mutated cancer cell lines; covalent KRASG12C inhibitors blocked MEK signaling and synergized with PI3K inhibitors in KRASG12C- mutated cell lines. Synergy between inhibitors of mutant RAS and RAS effectors was dependent on intact RTK/WT RAS signaling and was lost in both RASless or SOSless MEFs. Dual knock-out of WT RAS isoforms in KRAS- and HRAS-mutated cancer cell lines reduced PI3K signaling in KRAS-mutant cell lines and MAPK signaling in HRAS-mutant cell lines and reduced proliferation, confirming our findings in MEF cells. Overall, our data highlight the critical role of WT RAS isoforms in supporting mutant RAS signaling and should be considered when designing combination therapies in RAS-mutated cancers. Citation Format: Nancy E. Sealover, Bridget Finniff, Jacob Hughes, Hyun Lee, Robert L. Kortum. Wild-type RAS signaling is an essential therapeutic target in RAS-mutated cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1925.

Abstract 2499: Window-of-opportunity trial of metastatic pancreatic cancer reveals potential mechanisms of response to targeting RAS signaling

Abstract KRAS is mutated in ~85% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patient's tumors, suggesting that it is a key node of PDAC targeted therapy. RAF/MEK/ERK signaling is downstream of KRAS signaling. Preclinical studies targeting MEK showed promises but clinical trials failed to show the benefit compared to Standard-of-Care treatment chemotherapy. To elucidate the mechanism of action and resistance to several targeted therapies including MEK inhibition in human PDAC, we conducted a Window-Of-Opportunity trial for Metastatic pancreatic cancer (WOOM trial). In this trial, metastatic PDAC patients received 10 days of Cobimetinib, a FDA approved MEK inhibitor, therapy and specimens of pre- and post- treatment were obtained by biopsy to evaluate the response to targeted treatment using deep multi-omic analytics including DNA-seq, RNA-seq, multiplex IHC, cyclic IF and Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP). The clinical grade KI67 staining positivity was used as a readout of tumor response. We found three of 15 patient’s tumors had significantly decreased KI67 staining positivity after Cobimetinib treatment and defined them as Responsive tumors. Genomic sequence showed that KRAS allelic imbalance and KrasG12R mutations were seen significantly higher frequency in Responsive tumors compared to Non-responsive tumors. RNA-seq analysis showed that these Responsive tumors were more likely to be classical-like subtype compared to Non-responsive tumors. DSP analysis confirmed the downregulation of ERK phosphorylation after treatment in all examined cases consistent with effective target inhibition. Interestingly, MEK phosphorylation was upregulated after treatment paradoxically. This suggests that paradoxical upstream pathway activation including RAF activation could be potential resistance mechanism. MYC protein expression change was significantly correlated with KI67 protein expression change, which suggests MYC downregulation could contribute to action of Cobimetinib. We also found that Cobimetinib treatment increased the immunosuppressive TREM2+ Macrophage population from single cell RNA-seq data. Furthermore, PDX from biopsy recapitulated patient's response to therapy and could be a great tool for testing new therapeutic strategies. Here, we summarize the multi-omics data and discuss potential mechanisms of response and resistance to targeting RAS signaling and related microenvironmental changes. Citation Format: Motoyuki Tsuda, Colin Daniel, Xiaoyan Wang, Carl Pelz, Hayley Zimny, Alexander Smith, John Muschler, Xi Li, Tugba Yildiran Ozmen, Furkan Ozmen, Dove Keith, Christopher Corless, Koei Chin, Jonathan Brody, Charles Lopez, Gordon Mills, Rosalie Sears. Window-of-opportunity trial of metastatic pancreatic cancer reveals potential mechanisms of response to targeting RAS signaling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2499.

Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET)-based Assay for Measuring Interactions of CRAF with 14-3-3 Proteins in Live Cells.

CRAF is a primary effector of RAS GTPases and plays a critical role in the tumorigenesis of several KRAS-driven cancers. In addition, CRAF is a hotspot for germline mutations, which are shown to cause the developmental RASopathy, Noonan syndrome. All RAF kinases contain multiple phosphorylation-dependent binding sites for 14-3-3 regulatory proteins. The differential binding of 14-3-3 to these sites plays essential roles in the formation of active RAF dimers at the plasma membrane under signaling conditions and in maintaining RAF autoinhibition under quiescent conditions. Understanding how these interactions are regulated and how they can be modulated is critical for identifying new therapeutic approaches that target RAF function. Here, I describe a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based assay for measuring the interactions of CRAF with 14-3-3 proteins in live cells. Specifically, this assay measures the interactions of CRAF fused to a Nano luciferase donor and 14-3-3 fused to a Halo tag acceptor, where the interaction of RAF and 14-3-3 results in donor-to-acceptor energy transfer and the generation of the BRET signal. The protocol further shows that this signal can be disrupted by mutations shown to prevent 14-3-3 binding to each of its high-affinity RAF docking sites. This protocol describes the procedures for seeding, transfecting, and replating the cells, along with detailed instructions for reading BRET emissions, performing data analysis, and confirming protein expression levels. In addition, example assay results, along with optimization and troubleshooting steps, are provided.

The CNK–HYP scaffolding complex promotes RAF activation by enhancing KSR–MEK interaction

The RAS–MAPK pathway regulates cell proliferation, differentiation and survival, and its dysregulation is associated with cancer development. The pathway minimally comprises the small GTPase RAS and the kinases RAF, MEK and ERK. Activation of RAF by RAS is notoriously intricate and remains only partially understood. There are three RAF isoforms in mammals (ARAF, BRAF and CRAF) and two related pseudokinases (KSR1 and KSR2). RAS-mediated activation of RAF depends on an allosteric mechanism driven by the dimerization of its kinase domain. Recent work on human RAFs showed that MEK binding to KSR1 promotes KSR1–BRAF heterodimerization, which leads to the phosphorylation of free MEK molecules by BRAF. Similar findings were made with the single Drosophila RAF homolog. Here we show that the fly scaffold proteins CNK and HYP stabilize the KSR–MEK interaction, which in turn enhances RAF–KSR heterodimerization and RAF activation. The cryogenic electron microscopy structure of the minimal KSR–MEK–CNK–HYP complex reveals a ring-like arrangement of the CNK–HYP complex allowing CNK to simultaneously engage KSR and MEK, thus stabilizing the binary interaction. Together, these results illuminate how CNK contributes to RAF activation by stimulating the allosteric function of KSR and highlight the diversity of mechanisms impacting RAF dimerization as well as the regulatory potential of the KSR–MEK interaction.

Cryo-EM Structures of CRAF2/14-3-32 and CRAF2/14-3-32/MEK12 Complexes

RAF protein kinases are essential effectors in the MAPK pathway and are important cancer drug targets. Structural understanding of RAF activation is so far based on cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray structures of BRAF in different conformational states as inactive or active complexes with KRAS, 14-3-3 and MEK1. In this study, we have solved the first cryo-EM structures of CRAF2/14-3-32 at 3.4 Å resolution and CRAF2/14-3-32/MEK12 at 4.2 Å resolution using CRAF kinase domain expressed as constitutively active Y340D/Y341D mutant in insect cells. The overall architecture of our CRAF2/14-3-32 and CRAF2/14-3-32/MEK12 cryo-EM structures is highly similar to corresponding BRAF structures in complex with 14-3-3 or 14-3-3/MEK1 and represent the activated dimeric RAF conformation. Our CRAF cryo-EM structures provide additional insights into structural understanding of the activated CRAF2/14-3-32/MEK12 complex.

Signaling from RAS to RAF: The Molecules and Their Mechanisms.

RAF family protein kinases are a key node in the RAS/RAF/MAP kinase pathway, the signaling cascade that controls cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival in response to engagement of growth factor receptors on the cell surface. Over the past few years, structural and biochemical studies have provided new understanding of RAF autoregulation, RAF activation by RAS and the SHOC2 phosphatase complex, and RAF engagement with HSP90-CDC37 chaperone complexes. These studies have important implications for pharmacologic targeting of the pathway. They reveal RAF in distinct regulatory states and show that the functional RAF switch is an integrated complex of RAF with its substrate (MEK) and a 14-3-3 dimer. Here we review these advances, placing them in the context of decades of investigation of RAF regulation. We explore the insights they provide into aberrant activation of the pathway in cancer and RASopathies (developmental syndromes caused by germline mutations in components of the pathway).

Abstract C087: Window-of-opportunity trial of metastatic pancreatic cancer reveals mechanisms of response to targeting RAS signaling

Abstract KRAS is mutated in ~85% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients' tumors, suggesting that it is a key node of PDAC targeted therapy. RAF/MEK/ERK signaling is downstream of KRAS signaling. Preclinical studies targeting MEK showed promises but clinical trials failed to show the benefit compared to Standard-of-Care treatment chemotherapy. To elucidate the mechanism of action and resistance to several targeted therapies including MEK inhibition in human PDAC, we conducted a Window-Of-Opportunity trial for Metastatic pancreatic cancer (WOOM trial). In this trial, metastatic PDAC patients received 10 days of Cobimetinib, a FDA approved MEK inhibitor, therapy and specimens of pre- and post- treatment were obtained by biopsy to evaluate the response to targeted treatment using deep multi-omic analytics including DNA-seq, RNA-seq, multiplex IHC, cyclic IF and Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP). The clinical grade KI67 staining positivity was used as a readout of tumor response. We found three of 15 patients’ tumors had significantly decreased KI67 staining after MEKi treatment. Genomic sequence showed that two of three KI67-decreased patient’s tumors had KrasG12R mutations, which is significantly higher penetration compared to none of twelve KI67-non-responsive patient’s tumors. RNA-seq analysis showed that these KI67-decreased tumors are more classical-like compared to Ki67-non-responsive tumors. DSP analysis confirmed the downregulation of ERK phosphorylation after treatment in all examined cases. Moreover, MYC protein expression change is significantly correlated with KI67 protein expression change, which suggests MYC downregulation is the mechanism of action of MEK-inhibitor. Interestingly, MEK phosphorylation was upregulated after treatment in all examined cases. This suggests paradoxical RAF activation as a potential resistance mechanism. Furthermore, we found that Cobimetinib treatment changed the tumor microenvironment. Here, we summarize the multi-omics data and discuss the mechanism of response and resistance to target RAS signaling and related microenvironmental changes. Citation Format: Motoyuki Tsuda, Colin J. Daniel, Carl Pelz, Sam Sivagnanam, Dove Keith, Christopher L. Corless, Koei Chin, Lisa M. Coussens, Jonathan R. Brody, Charles D. Lopez, Gordon B. Mills, Rosalie C. Sears. Window-of-opportunity trial of metastatic pancreatic cancer reveals mechanisms of response to targeting RAS signaling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr C087.

The RAF cysteine-rich domain: Structure, function, and role in disease.

RAF kinases, consisting of ARAF, BRAF and CRAF, are direct effectors of RAS GTPases and critical for signal transduction through the RAS-MAPK pathway. Driver mutations in BRAF are commonplace in human cancer, while germline mutations in BRAF and CRAF cause RASopathy development syndromes. However, there remains a lack of effective drugs that target RAF function, which is partially due to the complexity of the RAF activation cycle. Therefore, greater understanding of RAF regulation is required to identify new approaches that target its function in disease. A key piece of this puzzle is the RAF zinc finger, often referred to as the cysteine-rich domain (CRD). The CRD is a lipid and protein binding domain which plays complex and opposing roles in the RAF activation cycle. Firstly, it supports the RAS-RAF interaction during RAF activation by binding to phosphatidylserine (PS) in the plasma membrane and by making direct RAS contacts. Conversely, under quiescent conditions the CRD also plays a critical role in maintaining RAF in a closed, autoinhibited state. However, the interplay between these activities and their relative importance for RAF activation were not well understood. Recent structural and biochemical studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of these roles and identified functional differences between BRAF CRD and that of CRAF. This chapter provides an in-depthreview of the CRDs roles in RAF regulation and how they may inform novel approaches to target RAF function.