Patient Care Settings Research Articles

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer People's Experiences of Stigma Across the Spectrum of Inpatient Psychiatric Care: A Systematic Review.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and other diverse sexual orientations and gender identity groups (LGBTQ+) face high rates of poor mental health. In the most severe and emergent of instances, inpatient psychiatric care may be required. LGBTQ+ people report experiences of mistreatment in healthcare settings broadly, such as denial of healthcare services and harassment from healthcare providers and other patients. However, little is known about the experiences of LGBTQ+ people in inpatient psychiatric care settings, specifically. The purpose of this review was to assess the existing literature for descriptions of LGBTQ+ people's experiences within inpatient psychiatric care. We searched multiple databases (i.e., PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar) for peer-reviewed articles that described the experiences of LGBTQ+ people within inpatient psychiatric care that were published in English. The included articles (N = 14) were analysed using a conceptual model of stigma and organised within those strata (structural, interpersonal and individual stigma) across the inpatient experience, (admission, inpatient unit, and discharge). Themes identified included: noninclusive intake tools and pervasive misgendering during the admission process; lack of healthcare infrastructure, inadequate training and lack of cultural humility, pervasive discrimination and victimization, silencing of LGBTQ+ patients, and feelings of fear and shame while on inpatient units, and lack of community resources during the discharge process. Clinicians should consider the perspectives and experiences of LGBTQ+ people to enact identity-affirming care practices that may increase mental healthcare engagement and improve long-term mental health outcomes.

Patterns of care contacts in the final year of life among opioid overdose fatalities in southern Sweden: a latent class analysis

BackgroundUnderstanding the heterogeneity of opioid overdose fatalities is critical to developing effective preventive interventions. This study examines patterns of care contacts among people who subsequently died from opioid overdose. The aim was to identify distinct groups of deceased individuals, based on their contacts with different care agencies in their last year of life.MethodsA retrospective registry study was conducted in Skåne, Southern Sweden. All recorded opioid overdose fatalities during the study period were included, n = 191. Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of care contacts in the last year of life.ResultsThree distinct classes were identified: “Few care contacts,” with limited interaction with any services; “Social service contacts,” comprising individuals who predominantly had contacts with the social services and, to a lesser extent, with prison and probation services; and “Numerous care contacts,” with extensive contacts with both healthcare and social services. The “few care contacts” class comprises about half of the population. This is an important finding, since this group has not been clearly visible in previous research. The analysis indicates significant gaps in service provision, particularly regarding substance use treatment and mental health support.ConclusionsUsing a person-centred approach, this article offers a novel way of analysing care contacts among people who subsequently died from opioid overdose. The identification of distinct groups, particularly a large group of people with minimal contact with the community care system, highlights the need for more targeted outreach and support work. Developing targeted interventions in emergency and inpatient care settings may provide an opportunity to reach the group with few care contacts.

Generating Consensus on Good Practices in the Care of Portuguese Internal Medicine Patients Facing Imminent Death: A Delphi Study

Context: Modern medicine aims to ensure a world in which all people experience a good end of life as an integral part of their life journey. A good end-of-life experience means dying with dignity and receiving the best healthcare based on scientific evidence. Objective: This study aims to reach a consensus about the contents of a comprehensive instrument based on the 10/40 Model of the International Collaborative for the Best Care for the Dying Person for evaluating inpatients facing imminent death in Portuguese internal medicine wards and a proposal for anticipatory medication for symptom control in inpatient and home care settings. Methods: We employed the Delphi method and conducted various rounds of questionnaire administration to 23 Portuguese internists competent in palliative medicine. Data were obtained in July and September of 2022. Results: Consensus was reached among the expert panel on the diagnostic, initial assessment, monitoring, and after-death care items of the tool, with minor adjustments to wording or content. However, it was not possible to reach a consensus on most of the proposals presented for anticipatory medication for symptomatic control. Conclusion: We present the consensus about the contents of a comprehensive instrument for evaluating inpatients facing imminent death in Portuguese internal medicine wards. Best practices in this setting were defined from the point of view of internists with expertise in palliative care. However, the best pharmacological practices still require further reviews of the literature and consensus.

A Web-Based Education Program About Primary Palliative Care for Heart Failure: A Study Protocol of Wait-Listed Randomized Controlled Trial.

The number of patients with heart failure (HF) is rapidly increasing as palliative care is being integrated into HF management and the need for a nursing workforce to meet these demands grows. To address this, we have developed a Web-based educational program on primary palliative care for HF among general registered nurses caring for patients with HF in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the program's effectiveness on nurse-reported palliative care practice, difficulty, and knowledge. In this open-label, individual-level, wait-listed randomized controlled trial, 150 Japanese general registered nurses, with experience in caring for patients with HF and clinical ladder level ≥ 2 in inpatient, outpatient, and home-visiting care settings, will be randomly divided (1:1 ratio) into a Web-based educational program group and a wait-list control group. The follow-up period is 6 months after the intervention. The primary outcome is the nurse-reported practice score in primary palliative care, and the secondary outcomes are the nurse-reported difficulties score and knowledge score. We herein describe the study protocol of a wait-listed randomized controlled trial regarding a Web-based educational program, which is a novel approach for these nurses. If the results of this study support our hypothesis, they could help expand primary palliative care, including daily nursing practices, such as symptom management and interdisciplinary collaboration, in the field of cardiovascular nursing.

Nurses navigating moral distress, resilience, and team dynamics: A literature review.

This manuscript explores the pervasive issue of moral distress among nurses and its impact on their well-being and professional satisfaction. Focusing on diverse factors contributing to moral distress, the review spans various experience levels and patient care settings. Utilizing integrative reviews and sourcing from PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and ProQuest, the study synthesizes findings from studies worldwide. The conceptual framework by Whittemore & Knafl is employed to comprehensively analyze nurses' experiences. Key factors were identified as contributing to moral distress, including concerns about care quality, team dynamics, and insufficient support. Interventions range from light-touch approaches like mentorship programs to resource-intensive strategies such as staff wellness initiatives. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurses' moral distress is also explored. Moral distress in nurses leads to burnout and, in some cases, prompts professionals to leave the field. The study emphasizes the need for organizational-level initiatives, support networks, and interventions to address moral distress. Identified gaps in the literature underscore opportunities for future research to better prepare clinicians and advance understanding across experience levels and settings.

Redesigned Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) Assessments Reduce Grade Inflation in the Experiential Setting

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the impact of redesigning an entrustable professional activities (EPAs) assessment tool on the accuracy of student performance assessment within pharmacy education. MethodsThe study used retrospective programmatic data for students on clinical rotations over a 3-year period and compared entrustment levels assigned by preceptors with suggested entrustment levels. This tool was redesigned to separate formative EPA feedback from final grade determination. Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests to identify trends in students ABOVE, AT, or BELOW the suggested entrustment levels. Additionally, to account for intercohort variability, the relationship between students ABOVE the suggested level of entrustment and postgraduate metrics was examined. ResultsAfter the implementation of the revised tool, there was a significant decrease (−3%) in the percentage of students scoring ABOVE the suggested entrustment levels and an increase in the percentage of students scoring AT (+1%) or BELOW (+2%) the suggested entrustment levels. Changes were also observed in individual patient care settings, with a decrease in grade inflation and an increase in accurate assessments. North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) pass rates, residency match rates, and grade point average did not correlate with entrustment levels. ConclusionThe redesigned EPA assessment tool demonstrated a decrease in grade inflation resulting in more accurate assessments. The tool’s focus on holistic grading and narrative descriptors contributed to better alignment between preceptor assessment and school-suggested achievement levels. This study suggests that EPA assessments in pharmacy education could benefit from a stronger emphasis on formative feedback and the use of holistic assessment methods for final grade determinations. The findings underscore the potential advantages of considering a separation between EPA scoring and final grades, prompting the Academy to explore their assessment practices to better reflect student performance in clinical experiences.

Population-based risk factors and urogenital comorbidities associated with genital herpes: A nationwide study of 4 million women

ObjectivesTo explore the population-based risk factors for genital herpes in women and examine whether genital herpes occurs at higher rates in women diagnosed with cervical neoplasia and common urogenital infections. MethodsAn open cohort study consisting of 4,097,075 women ≥15 years of age in Sweden (2002-2018). The outcome was genital herpes diagnosis. The predictor variables were sociodemographic factors (age, educational level, family income, region of residence, and country of origin) and urogenital comorbidities (cervical carcinoma neoplasia, cystitis, vaginosis, and vulvovaginitis) and parity. National registers and primary health care data were used. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Interactions tests were conducted. ResultsA total of 15,727 women received a genital herpes diagnosis in inpatient and outpatient specialist care settings during the study period. Sociodemographic factors and parity were associated with genital herpes. than women without these comorbidities. ConclusionsGenital herpes occurs with higher rates in women of high family income, young age, Swedish origin, co-occurrence of urogenital comorbidities, and nulliparity. The findings can be used by clinicians when encountering women with these risk factors.

Fostering nurse-patient relationships in palliative care: An integrative review with narrative synthesis.

Nurse-patient relationships are an integral component of person-centred palliative care. Greater understanding of how nurse-patient relationships are fostered and perceived by patients and nurses can be used to inform nursing practice. To systematically identify and synthesise how nurse-patient relationships are fostered in specialist inpatient palliative care settings, and how nurse-patient relationships were perceived by patients and nurses. Integrative review with narrative synthesis. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022336148, updated April, 2023). Five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Medline, Web of Science and PsycINFO) were searched for articles published from their inception to December 2023. Studies were included if they (i) examined nurse and/or patient perspectives and experiences of nurse-patient relationships in specialist inpatient palliative care, (ii) were published in English in a (iii) peer-reviewed journal. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate study quality. Data were synthesised using narrative synthesis. Thirty-four papers from 31 studies were included in this review. Studies were mostly qualitative and were of high methodological quality. Four themes were identified: (a) creating connections; (b) fostering meaningful patient engagement; (c) negotiating choices and (d) building trust. Nurses and patients are invested in the nurse-patient relationship, benefitting when it is positive, therapeutic and both parties are valued partners in the care. Key elements of fostering the nurse-patient relationship in palliative care were revealed, however, the dominance of the nurses' perspectives signifies that the nature and impact of these relationships may not be well understood.

Assessing guideline adherence and child abuse evaluation in infants with fractures: a retrospective quality control study

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To standardise the assessment of infants with fractures at University Children’s Hospital Zurich, a guideline was implemented in February 2021. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to this guideline and to assess changes in management before and after guideline implementation. The primary outcome was the overall adherence rate to the guideline. Additionally, we evaluated specific omissions of guideline steps by clinicians and investigated differences in adherence for infants younger vs older than six months, as well as variations between in- and outpatient care. Secondary outcomes focused on changes in the frequency of involvement of the child protection team, skeletal survey rates and child abuse detection, comparing these rates before and after guideline implementation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre quality control study. We included infants younger than 12 months diagnosed with fractures at the emergency department between 1 February 2021 and 31 August 2022. We excluded children with prior bone disease diagnoses and those whose parents did not consent to their children’s data being used for research. RESULTS: A total of 61 emergency department visits of infants with fractures were included in the study. The overall adherence rate to the guideline was 39%. Notably, in 68% of cases where clinicians deviated from the guideline, the primary reason was a missing consultation of the paediatrician or family doctor. Adherence levels were consistent across age groups (under and over six months), but there was a notable discrepancy between inpatient (53%) and outpatient (26%) care settings. Child protection team involvement increased to 54%, twice the rate observed before guideline implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence to the guideline was poor, emphasising the necessity for continuous training of clinicians to raise awareness regarding the differential diagnosis of child abuse. Despite the guideline’s implementation leading to a doubled rate of child protection team involvement, there remains a need for improvement. Notably, outpatient care exhibited lower guideline adherence, signalling an area requiring focused attention.

A qualitative study examining medical students′ expectations of psychiatric inpatient and intensive care settings

Background There is limited literature to date regarding medical students’ expectations of the psychiatric inpatient environment. This study aims to explore what medical students expect from psychiatric wards and psychiatric intensive care units prior to their placement. Psychiatric intensive care, arguably the most intense experience students will have in psychiatry, was used to highlight the full extent of student preconceptions. Methodology: Students were invited to complete a semi-structured questionnaire over a six-month period, from July to December 2021. Questions explored emotions prior to placement, expectations of the ward atmosphere, layout, patient behaviour and care strategies. 37 responses were received. Analysis followed the well-recognised six stages of thematic analysis. Results: Five themes emerged from the data: (1) Mixed feelings about placement; (2) Varied views about patient behaviour and illness; (3) Restrictive and controlled practice; (4) Similarities to acute general hospital care; (5) Care with empathy and compassion. Some of the expectations of students were markedly different to the reality of psychiatric inpatient and intensive care settings, with ideas of patients being physically restrained, unconscious and attached to ventilators. Conclusion: This study offers a unique insight into what medical students expect from psychiatry inpatient and intensive care settings, an issue that all clinicians who have student contact should be aware of. Results can better inform student preparation and placement supervision, leading to more meaningful learning and improved wellbeing.

Comparative analysis of postoperative complications and outcomes in outpatient versus inpatient orthognathic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the complication rates of single-jaw orthognathic surgery between outpatients and inpatients, and to examine their impact on the outcome of care setting.A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent single-jaw orthognathic procedures. Outpatients between 2008 and 2023 were selected as the study group, while inpatients between 1997 and 2023 were enrolled as the control group. The predictor variable was the patient care setting. The primary outcome variable was the occurrence of overall complications. Secondary outcomes included surgery-, anesthesia-, and patient-related complications. Other study variables included age, sex, surgery, and anesthesia procedures. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed and the significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.The sample included 307 patients with a mean age of 23.1 years ± 9.5 years, of whom 55% were female. The outpatient and inpatient groups consisted of 123 (40.1%) and 184 (59.9%) patients, respectively. Of the 123 outpatients, 104 (85.5%) were discharged on the day of surgery. Age (p = 0.012) and ketamine administration (p = 0.022) were significantly associated with complications among outpatients. Outpatient setting and age were significantly associated with overall complications (OR 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34–4.66, p = 0.003 and OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88–0.98, p = 0.021, respectively) and anesthesia-related complications (OR 4.43, 95% CI 2.03–10.5, p = 0.0003 and OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83–0.98, p = 0.041, respectively).The study demonstrated that outpatient orthognathic surgery had a high success rate but also identified a higher rate of anesthesia-related complications among outpatients, particularly in younger patients and in those receiving ketamine.

Recommendations for Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Nomenclature.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) involves the acquisition, interpretation, and immediate clinical integration of ultrasonographic imaging performed by a treating clinician. The current state of cardiac POCUS terminology is heterogeneous and ambiguous, in part because it evolved through siloed specialty practices. In particular, the medical literature and colloquial medical conversation contain a wide variety of terms that equate to cardiac POCUS. While diverse terminology aided in the development and dissemination of cardiac POCUS throughout multiple specialties, it also contributes to confusion and raises patient safety concerns. This statement is the product of a diverse and inclusive Writing Group from multiple specialties, including medical linguistics, that employed an iterative process to contextualize and standardize a nomenclature for cardiac POCUS. We sought to establish a deliberate vocabulary that is sufficiently unrelated to any specialty, ultrasound equipment, or clinical setting to enhance consistency throughout the academic literature and patient care settings. This statement (1) reviews the evolution of cardiac POCUS-related terms; (2) outlines specific recommendations, distinguishing between intrinsic and practical differences in terminology; (3) addresses the implications of these recommendations for current practice; and (4) discusses the implications for novel technologies and future research.

Single-Plane Versus Synchronous Biplane Ultrasound Imaging During Vascular Access Procedures: Which Is Better and How Can We Improve?

Highlights Biplane ultrasound imaging reduces need for probe manipulation during procedure. Providers note clinical benefit of biplane ultrasound imaging for vascular access. Biplane disadvantages include probe size, imaging quality, size of the screen. Thorough didactic and practical education is essential for biplane success. Abstract Background: Use of ultrasound guidance for vascular access procedures is commonplace in inpatient and outpatient care settings. Standard ultrasound probes offer the operator a single-plane view, necessitating rotation of probe to attain dual complimentary views. This mechanical probe rotation increases technical difficulty of ultrasound use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of cannulation success and efficiency of a synchronous biplane ultrasound mode in ultrasound-guided arterial line placement as compared with a standard single-view ultrasound mode in the operating room setting. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective surgery in which a radial arterial catheter would be used for hemodynamic monitoring were approached for consent to this study. Patients were randomized to either undergo placement with single-plane view versus synchronous biplane view; outcomes were recorded. Providers were provided preprocedural ultrasound education as well as the option of a short hands-on experience; their level of experience was noted. Results: Placement time of a peripheral arterial catheter was longer and required more attempts to be successful using synchronous biplane imaging as compared with single-plane imaging across providers of all skill/experience levels. Subjectively, providers noted the benefit of synchronous biplane imaging in vascular access; however, disadvantages including probe size, quality of imaging, and size of the screen were noted. Discussion: Thorough education regarding the use and functionality of biplane synchronous imaging in vascular access is essential. Additional guided-practice time with experienced operators could also be helpful to overcome the challenges observed in this study.

Integrated Perspectives on Clinical Decision Support: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Management Approaches.

We analyze five approaches to knowledge management in clinical decision support (CDS) systems: pattern recognition based on annotated imaging data, mining of stored structured medical data, text mining of published texts, computable knowledge design, and general or specific text corpora for large language models. Each method's strengths and limitations in automating clinical knowledge management while striving for a zero-error policy are evaluated, offering insights into their roles in enhancing healthcare through intelligent decision support. The study aims to inform decisions in the development of effective, transparent CDS systems in clinical and patient care settings.

Implementation of integrated care for type 2 diabetes Mellitus and Periodontitis in Germany: study protocol for a practice-based and cluster-randomized trial

BackgroundType 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and periodontitis share common risk factors and influence one another. However, primary care and oral health care continue to operate separate from each other and fail to synchronize care for patients with T2DM and periodontitis. The purpose of this practice-based trial is to evaluate the implementation of a new integrated care pathway for patients with T2DM and periodontitis. The new approach integrates a screening for T2DM risk in dental care settings in patients with periodontitis, a screening for periodontitis risk in primary care settings in patients with T2DM, and mutual referrals between dentists and primary care physicians.MethodsTwo practice-based studies will be carried out in parallel: (i) In dental care settings: a practice-based, multi-centric, cluster-randomized, controlled trial with a control and an intervention group; (ii) in primary care settings: a practice-based, multi-centric, non-randomized, controlled trial with a synthetic control group calculated from claims data. Following a two-step recruitment approach, 166 dentists and 248 general practitioners will be recruited, who themselves will recruit a total of 3808 patients in their practices. Patient data will be collected at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months after study enrollment. The evaluation comprises: (i) impact evaluation, using a hierarchical linear mixed model; (ii) process evaluation, based on surveys alongside the trials; (iii) economic evaluation. In addition, a Discrete-Choice-Experiment will identify provider’s payment preferences for the new care approach.DiscussionUpon successful implementation, the intervention will enable health care providers to detect a risk for T2DM and periodontitis in patients at an early stage, thus providing patients an opportunity for timely diagnosis and therapy. Ultimately, this can lead to increased quality of life and reduced health care expenditures. On a methodologic level, the project provides novel insights into a complex intervention on the intersection of general practice and dental care.Trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030587) on 3. July 2023 under ID “DRKS00030587“.

Comparative analysis of semantic segmentation and multi-boosted faster R-CNN for robotic tool detection in diabetes patient care

Diabetes, a common chronic illness, need meticulous patient care and treatment, which frequently necessitates advanced robotic help. The identification of robotic tools is critical in guaranteeing precise and safe medical procedures. With the growing use of robots in healthcare, reliable identification of instruments inside a patient care setting is critical for allowing smooth and efficient medical procedures. We used a Multi-Boosted Faster-Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (MBF-RCNN) to estimate Robotic Tool Detection in Diabetes Patient Care in the present research. Semantic Segmentation is a machine learning methodology centered on classifying pictures pixel-by-pixel, whereas Multi-Boosted Faster R-CNN recognizes objects using a variety of boosting strategies. Decimal Scaling Normalization is used during the preprocessing step to optimize the input data for both procedures. The effectiveness of both approaches is improved by doing extraction of features using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to find key trends in the information that is provided.The Multi-Boosted Faster-Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (MBF-RCNN) is an improved variation of the Faster R-CNN design that uses the boosting approach to improve object identification performance.Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve among the assessment metrics used. The findings show that the suggested approaches are effective in identifying and localizing robotic equipment, which is critical for effective treatments in controlling diabetes.This research promotes computer vision applications in healthcare, particularly in the care of diabetic patients. It assesses the efficiency and dependability of Semantic Segmentation and MBF-RCNN for robotic tool identification, opening the way for more efficient and dependable automation for healthcare contexts.

Understanding Opportunities for Prescribing Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) at Two Academic Medical Centers in a High Priority Jurisdiction for Ending the HIV Epidemic.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective, yet underutilized tool for HIV prevention. We sought to understand practice patterns and opportunities for prescribing PrEP across two large, urban, academic healthcare institutions in Chicago, Illinois. We analyzed electronic medical record data from two institutions including encounters for persons ≥18 years of age with ≥1 negative HIV test between 1/1/2015-12/31/2021 who had indications for PrEP. Eligible encounters were those within a six-month window after STI diagnosis, or as long as injection drug use (IDU) was documented. We categorized encounters as inpatient, emergency department (ED), primary care, infectious disease (ID), obstetrics and gynecology/women's health (OBGYN) and other outpatient settings. We performed bivariable and multivariable mixed effects regression models to examine associations, reporting odds ratios (or adjusted odds ratios) and 95% confidence intervals (OR, aOR, 95% CI). In total, 9644 persons contributed 53031 encounters that resulted in 4653 PrEP prescriptions. The two healthcare institutions had differing patient demographics; institution A had more 18-24 year-olds (58.3% vs 31.3%), more African Americans (83.8% vs 27.9%), and more women (65.7% vs 46.3%). Institution B had more White (40.6% vs 7.1%) and Hispanic persons (14.0% vs 4.2%), and more men who have sex with men (MSM) (15.2% vs 3.3%). Institution A had more eligible encounters in the ED (30.8% vs 7.3%) as well as in infectious disease, inpatient, OBYGN, and primary care settings. Institution B accounted for the majority of PrEP prescriptions (97.0%).Adjusted models found lower odds of PrEP prescriptions in non-Hispanic Black (aOR 0.23 [0.16, 0.32]) and Latino (aOR 0.62 [0.44, 0.89]) patients, those with injection drug use (aOR 0.01 [0.00, 0.09]), men who have sex with women (aOR 0.36 [0.23, 0.56]), women who have sex with men (aOR 0.11 [0.06, 0.19]), and in the ED (ref) or OBGYN (0.11 [0.04, 0.27]) settings; while increased odds of PrEP prescription were associated with non-Hispanic White (ref) and MSM (aOR 24.87 [15.79, 39.15]) patients, and encounters at Institution B (aOR 1.78 [1.25, 2.53]) and in infectious disease (aOR [11.92 [7.65, 18.58]), primary care (aOR 2.76 [1.90, 4.01]), and other outpatient subspecialty settings (aOR 2.67 [1.84, 3.87]). Institution A contained persons historically underrepresented in PrEP prescriptions, while institution B accounted for most PrEP prescriptions. Opportunities exist to improve equity in PrEP prescribing and across ED and OBGYN settings.

Investigation on the effect of social problem-solving instruction on nursing students' thinking and decision-making capacity

Registered nurses require individuals with outstanding mental skills like problem-solving, decision-making, and analytical abilities due to the complicated healthcare system and demanding patient care setting. Examining the impacts of a societal troubleshooting course on a group of college registered nurses was the goal of this quasialmost scientific inquiry. Prior to and following the treatment, the study attempted to compare changes in numerical poll results, corporate interviews, updates to the Social Handling Issues Stock, scores on the Critical Analysis Test, and answers to private questionnaires. 50 college registered nurses were randomly selected and assigned to two groups: the experimental group (n = 25) and the uncontrolled group (n = 25). The data obtained from the study were analyzed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) program. Resolving societal issues sure has a beneficial impact on pupils. Ability to solve societal challenges, make decisions, and suspect critically after the training session in the experimental group (P =0.05), but in the custody group (P >0.05), that result was not seen. The findings indicated that formal societal instruction could enhance intellectual critical thinking, problem solving, and decision-making abilities. In light of this finding, nursing education should be delivered in novel, inventive, and unconventional ways compared to conventional teaching techniques. Instruction in mental abilities has to be included in the nursing curriculum. Therefore, it is advised that nursing pupils receive mental formation, including problem-solving.

Why Do Physicians Prescribe Antibiotics? A Systematic Review of the Psycho-Socio-Organisational Factors Related to Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing of Antimicrobials in Europe.

Purpose: Effective antimicrobial use enhances care quality and combats antibiotic resistance. Yet, non-guideline factors influence potentially inappropriate prescribing. This study explores psycho-socio-organisational factors in antimicrobial prescribing as perceived by physicians across primary, secondary, and tertiary care. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases from 1 January 2000, to 8 March 2023, with an update search until 30 January 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies in Europe exploring psycho-socio-organisational factors for antibiotic prescribing from physicians' perspectives in hospital, inpatient, or primary care settings. Exclusion criteria targeted out-of-office prescriptions or low-quality studies. To evaluate the latter, several quality and risk-of-bias checklists were used. Data were extracted on study characteristics, study design, and methods and identified determinants of antibiotic prescribing. Data was analysed using a narrative synthesis method. Results: Among 8370 articles, 58 met inclusion criteria, yielding 35 articles from 23 countries. Three main themes emerged: personal, psychological, and organisational factors, encompassing seven determinants including work experience, knowledge, guideline adherence, uncertainty management, perceived pressure, time constraints, and diagnostic resource availability. Uncertainty management was key, with work experience and knowledge mitigating it. No additional factors emerged in the updated search. Conclusion: Enhanced uncertainty management decreases perceived patient and/or parental pressure to prescribe antibiotics, contributing to reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). Therefore, it is imperative to educate physicians on effectively managing uncertainty. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing should be tailored to the specific needs and preferences of the different prescribing physicians.

Reduced Likelihood of Hospitalization with the JN.1 or HV.1 SARS-CoV-2 Variants Compared to the EG.5 Variant.

Within a multi-state viral genomic surveillance program, we evaluated whether proportions of SARS-CoV-2 infections attributed to the JN.1 variant and to XBB-lineage variants (including HV.1 and EG.5) differed between inpatient and outpatient care settings during periods of cocirculation. Both JN.1 and HV.1 were less likely than EG.5 to account for infections among inpatients versus outpatients (aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.84; p=0.003] and aOR=0.35 [95% CI: 0.21-0.58; p<0.001], respectively). JN.1 and HV.1 variants may be associated with a lower risk of severe illness. The severity of COVID-19 may have attenuated as predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages shifted from EG.5 to HV.1 to JN.1.