T HE summer of I942 marked one of the largest full-scale experiments in the history of American education. As a result of the demands of war the great majority of American colleges and universities instituted a summer or session, enabling students to complete by September as much as an additional half-year's work. The procedures used and the schedules followed showed a great deal of variety, necessary in part because of differences due to local geography and local needs. In many cases traditional curriculum arrangements were entirely dispensed with and completely new educational techniques were adopted. Necessity produced changes which would not have occurred in a decade of peace. In the belief that the experiment forced upon the colleges might well reveal inadequacies and suggest improvements in educational practice, a careful survey of the reactions and experiences of the faculty and student body was made at Tufts College by questionnaire. Replies were received from 33 of the faculty members (75 per cent) actively employed in summer teaching and from i 6o regular Tufts students (55 per cent) who attended the summer session. These individuals, faculty as well as students, were drawn from the liberalarts school which in the previous regular school year consisted of 8o faculty members and I,048 students. The summer session consisted of two six-week periods, and a normal student program was two courses with class meetings five days a week for periods 8o minutes in length. Laboratory courses involved two to four additional afternoons a week. In the regular school year the normal student program consists of five courses, most of which meet three times a week for So-minute periods, except that science courses mean additional laboratory periods one or two afternoons a week. In six weeks of summer school the work of a regular semester was supposed to have been covered in each subject. The typical teaching-load for the summer was two courses for one of the two sixweek periods, though in certain cases the instructor taught one course each period. Summer school was a new experience for almost all of the students and for over half of the faculty. Only i 5 of the 33 faculty members had taught during any previous summer and 94