Improvement In Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Research Articles

Therapy duration and improvement of ventricular function in de novo heart failure: the Heart Failure Optimization study.

In patients with de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is expected to occur when started on guideline-recommended medical therapy. However, improvement may not be completed within 90 days. Patients with HFrEF and LVEF ≤ 35% prescribed a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator between 2017 and 2022 from 68 sites were enrolled, starting with a registry phase for 3 months and followed by a study phase up to 1 year. The primary endpoints were LVEF improvement > 35% between Days 90 and 180 following guideline-recommended medical therapy initiation and the percentage of target dose reached at Days 90 and 180. A total of 598 patients with de novo HFrEF [59 years (interquartile range 51-68), 27% female] entered the study phase. During the first 180 days, a significant increase in dosage of beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was observed (P < .001). At Day 90, 46% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41%-50%] of study phase patients had LVEF improvement > 35%; 46% (95% CI 40%-52%) of those with persistently low LVEF at Day 90 had LVEF improvement > 35% by Day 180, increasing the total rate of improvement > 35% to 68% (95% CI 63%-72%). In 392 patients followed for 360 days, improvement > 35% was observed in 77% (95% CI 72%-81%) of the patients. Until Day 90, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias were observed in 24 wearable cardioverter-defibrillator carriers (1.8%). After 90 days, no sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurred in wearable cardioverter-defibrillator carriers. Continuous optimization of guideline-recommended medical therapy for at least 180 days in HFrEF is associated with additional LVEF improvement > 35%, allowing for better decision-making regarding preventive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

Does Cardiac Function Improvement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reduce All-cause Mortality?

BackgroundThe effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on cardiac function improvement remains controversial. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that improvement in cardiac function after CABG does not improve life expectancy. This study aimed to examine whether CABG improved cardiac function and how this improvement influenced all-cause mortality and to compare patient prognosis according to preoperative cardiac function. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35% who underwent CABG between January 1994 and December 2022. We compared patients with and without cardiac function improvement, defined as an increase in LVEF of ≥10%, to identify associated factors and assess the impact on all-cause mortality. We also compared outcomes according to the degree of preoperative LV dysfunction. ResultsAmong the 166 patients included, 102 and 64 had a preoperative LVEF of 25%-35% and ≤25%, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 79.9 ± 72.3 months. We observed significant LVEF improvement, from 28% (range, 23.3%-35%) preoperatively to 39% (range, 31%-46%) at 13.1 months postoperatively. The 7-year survival rates were similar in the ejection fraction ≤25% and 25%-35% groups (80.2% vs 73.8%, P = .11). However, patients with an LVEF improvement of ≥10% exhibited a markedly better prognosis than those without LVEF improvement at 7 years (85.9% vs 63.5%, P=.001). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that CABG may enhance cardiac function in more than half of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, with a correlation to improved all-cause mortality. Moreover, LVEF improvement after CABG is associated with an improved prognosis.

HF Etiology and cardiac contractility modulation therapy

ObjectivesOur study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) depending on HF etiology.MethodsWe enrolled 166 patients with optimal medical therapy-resistant HFrEF (median age 59 years, 83.7% males, median NYHA class − 2, median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) − 29.0%) who underwent CCM therapy device implantation from 2013 to 2019 in four medical centers in Russia. The HF etiology was determined based on invasive coronary angiography or cardiac MRI data. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 6-minute walking test (6MWT), and NTproBNP-tests were performed at a baseline and 12 months after the implantation.ResultsThe ischemic etiology of HF was revealed in 100 patients (61.5%) (ICM group); the non-ischemic group (NICM) evolved 66 patients (38.5%). Patients in the ICM group were significantly older (61[57–69] vs. 55 [42.8–61], p < 0.001), more frequently had hypertension (79% vs. 42.4%, p < 0.001) and chronic kidney disease (43% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.012). Patients in the NICM group had significantly more often atrial fibrillation (AF) (58% vs. 74%, p = 0.048), larger end-diastolic volume (EDV) (249 [208–309] vs. 220 [192–271], p = 0.019) and end-systolic volume (ESV) (183 [147–230] vs. 154 [128–199], p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in mortality between ICM and NICM groups (14.4 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.51). In 12 months, there was a significant increase in LVEF in the NICM group (+ 2.0 [2–6] vs. +7.7 [2–12], p < 0.001), while the improvement in the 6MWT (+ 75 [22–108] vs. +80 [10–160], p = 0.851) and NYHA class did not reach the level of significance. The subanalysis between patients with improved NYHA class and those without improvement revealed that patients without improvement more frequently had AF (56% vs. 89%; p < 0.01), chronic obstructive lung disease (18% vs. 35% p = 0.047), higher blood pressure (110 [105–120] vs. 120[110–129]; p = 0.032).ConclusionIn this multicenter retrospective study, patients with non-ischemic HFrEF showed a significantly higher improvement in LVEF and LV reverse remodeling following CCM therapy device implantation. There was no significant association between HF etiology and survival in drug-resistant HFrEF patients following CCM therapy.

Cardiac Reverse Remodeling Mediated by HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: Comparison to Older Generation Devices.

Currently, the fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (LVAD) HeartMate 3 (HM3) is the only commercially available device for advanced heart failure (HF) patients. However, the left ventricular (LV) functional and structural changes following mechanical unloading and circulatory support (MCS) with the HM3 have not been investigated. We compared the reverse remodeling induced by the HM3 to older generation continuous-flow LVADs. Chronic HF patients (n = 405) undergoing MCS with HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD, n = 115), HM3 (n = 186), and HeartMate II (HM2, n = 104) at four programs were included. Echocardiograms were obtained preimplant and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following LVAD implantation. There were no differences in the postimplant serial LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between the devices. The postimplant LV internal diastolic diameter (LVIDd) was significantly lower for HM2 at 3 and 6 months compared with HVAD and HM3. The proportion of patients achieving "cardiac reverse remodeling responder" status (defined as LVEF improvement to ≥40% and LVIDD ≤5.9 cm) was 11.9%, and was similar between devices. HeartMate 3 appears to result in similar cardiac reverse remodeling as older generation CF-LVADs, suggesting that the fully magnetically levitated device technology could provide an effective platform to further study and promote cardiac reverse remodeling.

When to implant an ICD in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction? Insights from the HF-OPT trial

Abstract Background In patients with de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is expected to occur when started on guideline-recommended medical therapy (GRMT). However, the period of time, when LVEF improvement is completed, is unknown. Purpose Evaluation of improvement of LVEF &amp;gt;35% within the first year after de novo diagnosis of HFrEF with severely reduced LVEF &amp;lt;35%. Methods In the prospective HF-OPT-trial, patients with de novo HFrEF and LVEF ≤35% prescribed the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) were enrolled and followed up to one year. GRMT was initiated and uptitrated according current guidelines. LVEF improvement &amp;gt;35% under GRMT was echocardiographically assessed at day 0, day 90, day 180 and day 360. Results A total of 487 patients (59 years (IQR: 51-68), 27% women) were followed until day 180. Out of 487 patients 392 patients were followed additionally to day 360. Dosages of GRMT were significantly increased during follow-up (p&amp;lt;0.001) At 90 days, 46% (CI: 41%-50%) of the patients had LVEF improvement &amp;gt;35%. About half of those with persistently LVEF&amp;lt;35% at day 90 (46%, CI: 40%-52%) had LVEF improvement &amp;gt;35% by day 180, increasing the total rate of improvement &amp;gt;35% to 68% (CI: 63% - 72%). Until day 360 the rate of LVEF improvement &amp;gt;35% increased to 78%. Conclusions 78% of patients with de novo HFrEF showed improvement in LVEF &amp;gt;35% during the first year after diagnosis following GRMT. This finding impacts decision making for primary preventive ICD implantation.Development of LVEF.

Clinical characteristics of patients with better ejection fraction recovery after upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Abstract Background Chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing can cause cardiac systolic dysfunction and heart failure (HF), increased risk of HF hospitalization and adverse outcomes. In these patients upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may improve left ventricular function. Purpose We aimed to identify the profile of patients (their clinical, electrical and echocardiographic characteristics) who are more likely to make a significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) one year after revision of the RV pacing system to CRT. Methods This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study. We included patients with a permanent antibradycardia pacemaker who had no systolic dysfunction and HF symptoms at the time of pacemaker implantation and who experienced a drop in LVEF below 35% during follow-up, with development of HF symptoms and with at least 20% of ventricular pacing. In all patient's revision to CRT was performed at our center between January 2014 and December 2019. We excluded patients who were indicated for a system upgrade regardless of the percentage of ventricular pacing and those in whom the drop in LVEF is due to a new coronary event. We used patients’ medical records to collect data on baseline characteristics. LVEF was measured pre-revision and 12 months after upgrade. To examine the difference in LVEF change between specified subgroups of patients we used a t-test. Results During the defined period, 82 upgrade procedures from conventional pacemaker to CRT were done in our center. We excluded 12 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology, 4 with non-LBBB QRS morphology but with QRS duration over 150ms and 4 patients who died within a year after revision to CRT. Therefore, we analyzed 62 patients (20.9% female, mean age 66.9 ± 11.2 years, mean LVEF 25.9 ± 6.8). After 12 months, 58.1% of patients had an increase in EF above 5%, and the mean change in LVEF (ΔLVEF) was 7.8 ± 11.8. Compared to those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP), patients with ischemic etiology had statistically significantly less improvement in LVEF (ΔLVEF 1.8 ± 6.8 vs 13.1 ± 12.7, p &amp;lt; 0.01), as well as patients with an RV apical pacing compared to those with a septal lead position (ΔLVEF 5.1 ± 9.1 vs 14.1 ± 14.7, p = 0.021). Patients with narrower paced QRS complex (&amp;lt;150ms) before upgrade had a significantly greater improvement in LVEF compared to those with a wider paced QRS complex (≥150ms) (ΔLVEF 10.9 ± 12.2 vs 4.8 ± 10.7, p = 0.04), and those with post-revision paced QRS width above 150ms had significantly lower change in LVEF compared to those with a narrower paced QRS (ΔLVEF 4.6 ± 9.8 vs 11.1 ± 12.8, p = 0.028). Conclusion Patients with NICMP and with width of the paced QRS complex before and after revision to CRT below 150ms had significantly greater improvement in LVEF 12 months after the upgrade. The position of RV lead significantly affects the success of the upgrade procedure.

Left bundle branch area pacing optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT CRT) -comparative results to a CRT implanted patient population

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is gold standard treatment option among patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and intraventricular conduction delay of left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. Purpose Left bundle branch area pacing optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT CRT) is a novel and promising approach for CRT candidate patients even in advanced intraventricular conduction delay, however convincing follow-up data regarding this patient group is still lacking. Methods In our observational registry 35 LOT CRT vs. 35 conventional CRT patients were consecutively implanted according to current guidelines. All the patients had LBBB morphology QRS width of &amp;gt;150 ms. The two compared patient group did not show significant difference in age, gender, baseline non-ischemic etiology, LVEF, NYHA functional class, LBBB QRS width. Results Immediate postoperative results showed significantly increased QRS width reduction (p=.028) and at 6 months of follow-up a significantly greater improvement in LVEF(p=.031), NYHA functional class (p=.04) and Nt-ProBNP levels (p=0.043) were seen in LOT CRT patient group compared to conventional CRT patients. Conclusion Our single center observational study showed significant improvement in prompt postoperative QRS width and clinical follow-up parameters in LOT CRT implanted patients compared to conventional CRT implanted patients.LOTCRTvs.CRTQRSwidthreductionLOTCRTXray

Biomarkers to predict improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction after atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist. Catheter ablation (CA) of AF is increasingly used in patients with AF and HF. However, prediction of improvement of HF after CA is challenging. Aim We aimed to evaluate the value of biomarkers, alone and in conjunction with a clinical tool (Antwerp score) to predict left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after CA in patients with AF and HF. Methods Patients undergoing CA for AF with depressed LVEF (&amp;lt;50%) were included. Plasma levels of 13 biomarkers were measured immediately prior to CA. Patients were categorized into "responders" (LVEF normalisation after CA in case of HFmrEF and at least 10% LVEF improvement and LVEF &amp;gt; 40% at follow-up in case of HFrEF) and "non-responders" (no LVEF recovery after CA). Models were constructed by comparing the plasma levels of the various biomarkers in responders and non-responders and by adjusting for age, sex, and Antwerp score and subsequent biomarkers were then combined according based on likelihood-ratios. The predictive power of the biomarkers alone and combined in outcome prediction, as well as improvement of the Antwerp score was then evaluated. Results Out of 1665 patients undergoing CA of AF, we included 208 patients with depressed LVEF (median age 63 years, 19% female, median LAVI 42 ml/m2, median LVEF 43%). The median follow-up time was 30 months [IQR 20-34] and the median time to LVEF recovery was 8 months [IQR 3-22]. Of these, 161 (77%) were responders and 47 (23%) were non-responders. Out of 13 biomarkers, four biomarkers (ANG2, GDF15, FGF23 and MyBPC3) were significantly different between responders and non-responders (p ≤0.001). A biomarker panel using these four biomarkers could predict LVEF recovery after CA for AF with an AUC of 0.72 (95%CI 0.64-0.81) overall, 0.69 (95%CI 0.59-0.78) in HFmrEF and 0.88 (95%CI 0.77-0.98) in HFrEF (Figure, A). Only ANG2 and GDF15 remained significantly associated with LVEF recovery after adjustment for age, sex, and the Antwerp score. The AUC of the Antwerp score for prediction of LVEF recovery improved from 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83, Figure, B) to 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.86, Figure, C) in the overall population, from 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.81) to 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.84) in case of HFmrEF and from 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.97) to 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.99) in case of HFrEF when ANG2 and GDF15 were included in the model. Conclusion A biomarker panel using ANG2, GDF15, FGF23 and MyBPC3 performs similarly for prediction of LVEF recovery after CA in AF compared to the Antwerp score. The biomarkers ANG2 and GDF15 slightly improve the predictive value of the Antwerp score.Figure

Single center experience of efficacy and safety of atrioventricular node ablation after left bundle branch area pacing for the management of atrial fibrillation

Abstract Introduction Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) with permanent pacing is an effective treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Permanent right ventricular pacing is associated with cardiac dyssynchrony, which can worsen heart failure (HF) symptoms. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a recent pacing technique, more physiologic and less associated with cardiac dyssynchrony. Purpose To evaluate feasibility, safety and outcomes at 6 months of AVNA associated with LBBAP in patients with symptomatic AF. Methods In this retrospective monocentric study, we included all consecutive patients treated with AVNA procedure and LBBAP. Procedures characteristics, clinical follow-up, electrical and echographic data at baseline and 6 months were studied and compared to the data of a matched cohort (1:1) of patients who received an AVNA procedure with conventional pacing between March 2010 and February 2023. Results 75 AVNA procedures and LBBAP were studied. The success rate of AVNA was 98.7% at first ablation without any complications, especially no lead dislodgement or threshold rise. Pacing electrical parameters at implant were good, and stable at 6 months follow-up, with no threshold rise. At 6 months, 4 (5%) patients were hospitalized for heart failure and 1 (1.3%) was deceased. Patients had a significative improvement in NYHA class, palpitations symptoms, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p ≤ 0.0001 for all). After matching with a cohort of patients with AVNA and conventional pacing (n=68), patients with LBBAP had a significantly better improvement of LVEF (+5.27±9.62% versus -0.48±14%; p = 0.01), and a lower rate of a composite endpoint (all cause death and hospitalization for HF) (HR 0.34, 95%CI: 0.1-1.06; p = 0.064). Conclusions AVNA with LBBAP in patients with symptomatic AF was feasible and safe. Complication rate and adverse outcomes at 6 months were similar to AVNA with conventional pacing, and LVEF improvement was significantly greater.Matched populationsOutcomes at 6 months

Predictors of improvement in LV ejection fraction post PVC ablation

Abstract Introduction Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) is a frequently encountered finding in routine ECGs, that in certain individuals may be followed by reduction in ejection fraction (EF). This may be improved or even reversed with a medical or interventional reduction of ectopic burden. Objective The primary objective of this study is to assess the potential effectiveness of cardiac ablation in suppressing PVC and subsequently enhancing the EF. Further we aim to establish predictive factors of the success of the intervention. Methods In a retrospective data analysis at a single medical centre, we examined records of 116 patients who underwent ectopic ablation, with 10 patients having more than 1 ablation. Demographic information, heart-related conditions along with the presence of a scar on MRI, was collected. The study also recorded pre- and post-procedure PVC burden and EF measurements. Results Demographics and procedural details are in table 1. It was found that patients participating in this study were predominantly male (66.4%), on average 60.1 (± 13.6) years old, overweight (BMI 29.8 ± 5.4) with no additional heart disease (56%) and no scarring on MRI (55%).The PVC burden before ablation (27.9 ± 12.7) significantly reduced to 8.0 ± 11.2 post-ablation (p &amp;lt; 0.005), marking an average relative reduction of 68.1% (± 44.1%). Successful interventions, defined by a reduction exceeding 50%, were observed in 79% of patients. The EF increased from 39.6 ± 8.9 to 47.5 ± 10.7 post-ablation (p &amp;lt; 0.005), corresponding to an average increase by 8.4 ± 8.5. Notably amongst the patients who had a successful ablation, 36% of patients achieved normalized EF (&amp;gt;55%) and 42% showed an improvement of at least 5%. A strong correlation emerged between the relative change in PVC and the ejection fraction measured after ablation, with an increase by 0.10 for every percent reduction (p &amp;lt; 0.00). The relative increase in the EF% was significantly higher in patients where the PVC burden was reduced by at least 50% (figure 1). Linear fixed effect modelling explored the influence of patient characteristics on the model. Patients with higher BMI had a lower EF after ablation with same relative reduction in PVC (p &amp;lt; 0.03). Similarly, a scar on MRI and associated heart condition was associated with reduced improvement in ejection fraction (p &amp;lt; 0.02). Also, for every increase in age patients had a reduction of 0.2 EF after ablation (p &amp;lt; 0.01). Right heart PVC’s were ablated more successfully, and had higher EF post ablation (p &amp;lt; 0.01). Conclusion In conclusion, reduction in PVC burden increases the EF after treatment. Increasing BMI, age and presence of associated heart disease can negatively impacted LVEF post ablation. Further research could improve the model that predicts improvement in LV function post successful PVC ablation.Figure 1Table 1

Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary CRT implantation versus CRT upgrade: single center experience

Abstract Background As heart failure (HF) management evolves, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as a cornerstone intervention, improving left ventricular (LV) function and reducing morbidity and mortality. The Budapest trial specifically addressed upgrading from permanent pacemaker (PPM) to CRT, emphasizing the potential for improved clinical outcomes and quality of life in this population. The findings highlighted the impact of CRT upgrade and contribute valuable insights to the cardiac device strategies for HF patients. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between patients undergoing primary CRT implantation and those undergoing CRT upgrade. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of heart failure patients who received CRT devices between 2015 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups: those undergoing primary CRT implantation and those undergoing CRT upgrade. Clinical outcomes, including mortality rate, hospitalization for HF exacerbation, and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results A total of 847 patients were included in the study, with 74,5% (n=631) undergoing primary CRT implantation and 13,5% (n=114) receiving CRT upgrades. The mean age was 72±10 years-old and 57% (n=485) were women, and a mean follow-up time of 23±8 months. 33.7% (n=285) of the total were of ischemic etiology. The primary CRT implantation group demonstrated a mortality of 34% (n=215) and 13% (n=84) of hospitalization due to HF; NYHA functional class improvement in 58% (n=369), and 35,7% (n=225) were CRT responders with a mean LV ejection fraction (EF) improvement of ±10%, while the CRT upgrade group had a 31% (n=36) mortality and 19% (n=22) of hospitalization due to HF; NYHA functional class improvement in 60% (n=68), and 27% (n=31) were CRT responders with a mean LV EF improvement of 8,7%. There were no statistically significant differences regarding each endpoint, namely mortality, HF hospitalizations, NYHA functional class improvement, CRT responders and mean LVEF improvement. Conclusion A clear benefit from implantation of a primary CRT device implantation has already been demonstrated. However, recent trials revealed there was also benefit in upgrading from PPM to CRT patients with decrease LVEF, comparing with PPM. This study showed that the benefits from primary CRT were similar to the benefits from upgrading CRT, in terms of mortality reduction, HF hospitalizations, NYHA functional class improvement, CRT responders and mean LVEF improvement. Once again, just like in the most recent trials, this study demonstrates the clear benefit of upgrading from a PPM to CRT in patients with decreased LVEF.

Clinical and long term safety outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing : a large retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the gold standard for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Recently, studies have shown promising results for conduction system pacing (CSP) as an alternative to BVP. However, the small study samples and paucity of data concerning long term safety of these devices prevent CSP from being used as first line therapy. Purpose This study examines clinical outcomes and long term safety of CSP compared to BVP. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study from patients receiving CSP or BVP. All patients implanted with either CSP (N = 282) or BVP (N = 216) from 2018 to 2023 were included. Patients had to complete at least 3 months of follow-up and CSP patients had to pace at least 20% of time at first visit. The outcomes were defined as at least one heart failure hospitalization and the complication rates for both arms. Results Median [IQR] follow-up time was 1.64 years [0.73 – 2.80]. Heart failure admissions were numerically lower for CSP group but when adjusted to confounders the adjusted odds ratio was 0.75 in the CSP group compared to BVP ([95% CI, 0.43-1.31]; P = 0.32). Long term complication rates (infection, lead dysfunction, diaphragmatic stimulation requiring system revision, etc.) were lower in the CSP group (4 [1.4%] vs 10 [4.7%]; odds ratio, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.06-0.69]; P = 0.01). Short term complication rates (lead displacement, infection, pneumothorax, etc.) were however similar for both arms (16 [5.7%] vs 11 [5.1%]; odds ratio, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.64-3.65]; P = 0.33). In two patients, septal lead extraction after over a year was possible without any sequelae. The change in the QRS duration went from 150 ms to 149 ms for group (p=NS) and from 153ms to 144ms for comparable CSP group (P = 0,01). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 28% to 40% in the BVP group and from 32% to 40% in the CSP group with pre intervention LVEF less than 50% (P &amp;lt; 0.0001 for both groups). Procedure duration was significantly shorter for CSP (82.3 minutes [32] vs 93.1[39.1]; P = .0002). Conclusion CSP approach achieves similar clinical results as BVP, with significantly less complications, shorter implant times, shorter QRS durations and comparable LVEF improvement. All these favorable results are obtained using less leads and simpler devices.

Newly diagnosed heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation referred for catheter ablation - identifying patients with arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy

Abstract Introduction Atrial tachyarrhythmias are primary drivers in the development of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AiCM). The restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with an AF (atrial fibrillation) based AiCM results in enhancement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF). This study aims to assess the prevalence of undiagnosed and unexplained heart failure among patients with AF referred for catheter ablation and seeks to phenotype these patients. Methods Our registry, a prospective, observational clinical cohort that recruits patients with heart rhythm disorders at a large tertiary-care center since March 2021 was interrogated for AF patients. These patients underwent screening for heart failure based on clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics. Undiagnosed heart failure at baseline, lack of heart failure medication and absence of known structural heart disease were considered suspicious for AiCM. Results A total of 1225 patients were analyzed. 35.2% were female, median age 67 (IQR 59;75) years, median LV-EF 55.0 (IQR 50;60) % and median N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) 686 (IQR 210;1630) mg/dl. NYHA class I was reported in 28.3% cases, NYHA class II in 32.2%, NYHA class III in 20.2% and NYHA class IV in 2%. At baseline, 263 patients (17.6%) had an LV-EF &amp;lt; 50% of those 110/263 (42%) with suspected AiCM. Patients with suspected AiCM were 67 (IQR 58;76) years old, 40.9% were female, median LV-EF was 41.0 (IQR 35;41) % and NT-proBNP at admission was 1681 (IQR 775;2352) mg/dl. Patients with suspected AiCM had a significantly reduced TAPSE (19 vs. 22 mm; p&amp;lt;0.001), showed generic characteristics of heart failure (NTproBNP: p&amp;lt;0.001, NYHA class: p=0.049), while EHRA score was significantly lower (p=0.006). In contrast, patients with known cardiomyopathy of non-AiCM origin at baseline and EF &amp;lt; 50% (n=153) had significantly higher LAVI (44.8 vs. 38.8 ml/m2; p=0.002), were predominantly male (76.5 vs. 59.1 %; p=0.004) and had lower GFR (60.2 vs. 68.5 ml/min; p=0.002) compared to AiCM patients. Among 29/110 suspected AiCM patients with available TTE at follow-up (within 12 months post-catheter ablation), 26/29 exhibited an improved LV-EF (40% at baseline vs. 54% at FU; p&amp;lt;0.001). 3/3 patients without LV-EF improvement exhibited arrhythmia recurrence. Conclusion Primary AiCM was suspected in 42% of all AF patients with reduced LV function referred for catheter ablation. These patients exhibited a different phenotype compared to the remaining cohort. After catheter ablation, ejection fraction improved in 90% of AiCM patients. These findings call for structured HF screening in clinical routine in AF patients. In the future, validated scores are required to enable early rhythm control for these patients.Proportion of patients with HFrEFCourse of EF after catheter ablation

Left bundle branch pacing and cardiac remodeling in HF patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: epigenetic pathways and clinical outcomes.

Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing could achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients who cannot be resynchronized via the placement of the left ventricle (LV) lead into the coronary sinus. LBB pacing could improve cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with LBB block who are affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). LBB pacing could increase the number of CRT responders and lead to the best clinical outcomes in HF patients with T2DM, inducing cardiac remodeling and improving left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) via microRNA (miR) modulation. In a multicenter observational study, we enrolled 334 HF patients with LBB block and an indication to receive LBB pacing for CRT. In these patients, we evaluated the CRT responder rate, clinical outcomes, and miR expression at 1 year of follow-up. At 1 year of follow-up, we had 223 responders (66.8%), 132 hospitalizations for HF (39.5%), 24 cardiac deaths (7.2%), and 37 all-cause deaths (11.1%), with a higher rate of HF hospitalizations (77 (69.4%) vs 55 (24.7%), p < 0.05), and cardiac deaths (13 (11.7% vs 11 (4.9%), p < 0.05) in non-responders vs responders. At the end of follow-up, we found the lowest expression of miR-26, miR-29, miR-30, miR-92, and miR-145 in LBB-pacing non-responders vs responders (p < 0.05), and a direct correlation between miR-30 (0.340, [0.833-1.915]; p 0.001), the 6-minute-walking test (6MWT; 0.168, [0.008-0.060]; p 0.011), angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI; 0.157, [0.183-4.877]; p 0.035), sodium-glucose-transporter-2 inhibitors (0.245, [2.242-7.283]; p 0.001), and LVEF improvements. C reactive protein (CRP) inversely correlated with LVEF improvement (-0.220, [-(0.066-0.263)]; p 0.001). ARNI (1.373, CI 95% [1.007-1.872], p 0.045), miR-30 (2.713, CI 95% [1.543-4.769], p 0.001), and 6MWT (1.288, CI 95% [1.084-1.998], p 0.001) were predictors of LBB pacing responders at 1 year of follow-up. LBB-pacing responders evidenced miR modulation, which was linked to significant improvement of the cardiac pump. Specifically, miR-30 was linked to cardiac pump improvement and predicted responders at 1 year of follow-up in patients with T2DM.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transcatheter Intervention, Surgery, and Pharmacological Treatment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation — A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis with ≥12-Month Follow-up

Aim: Evaluate, using a Bayesian network meta-analysis system, the long-term prognosis of patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) undergoing individual or combined treatment with percutaneous intervention, surgical intervention, or optimal medical therapy. Compare the prognostic outcomes of the different treatment modalities. Methods: Computerized searches of Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases were performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were searched to compare prognoses following transcatheter interventions, surgery, and optimal pharmacological treatment for FMR, all with a construction timeframe of 21 October 2023. The primary endpoint event was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint events were heart failure readmission rate, mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+ improvement rate, New York Heart Association (NYHA) improvement rate (improvement to I–II), and degree of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement. Results: Twenty-six (26) papers were included, comprising 10 RCTs and 16 observational studies involving 5443 patients. A network meta-analysis showed no significant difference in prognosis for all-cause mortality among transcatheter interventions, surgical procedures, and optimal pharmacological treatments. For heart failure readmission rates, mitral valve surgery was superior to MitraClip (odds ratio (OR) = 11.82; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67, 90.13). For NYHA (improvement to I–II) improvement rates, the results showed no significant differences for the various mitral interventions. For MR ≤2+ improvement rates, the MitraClip (OR = 3.07; 95% CI: 2.42, 3.76), MitraClip+Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (OR = 2.93; 95% CI: 2.38, 3.52), mitral valve surgery (OR = 3.01; 95% CI: 2.24, 3.8), and annuloplasty (OR = 4.31; 95% CI: 3.12, 5.58) were superior to GDMT, and mitral valve surgery (OR = 0.07; 95% CI: –0.45, 0.62) was superior to MitraClip+GDMT. For the degree of improvement in LVEF, Carillon+GDMT (mean difference (MD) = –0.97; 95% CI: –1.72, –0.22) was superior to GDMT, mitral valve surgery was superior to Carillon+GDMT (MD = 4.67; 95% CI: 0.92, 8.39); MitraClip+GDMT (MD = 4.01; 95% CI: 1.28, 6.66), GDMT (MD = 3.71; 95% CI: 0.04, 7.35), and annuloplasty were superior to mitral valve surgery (MD = –6.42; 95% CI: –11.96, –0.78). Conclusion: There were no significant differences among the three treatment modalities of transcatheter intervention, surgery, and optimal drug therapy in improving all-cause mortality hard endpoint events, and no significant differences were seen in the rates of heart failure readmission and NYHA improvement (improvement to I–II). However, surgery was superior to transcatheter intervention and optimal drug therapy in terms of improvement in the degree of regurgitation and LVEF.

Longitudinal comparison of dyssynchrony correction and 'strain' improvement by conduction system pacing: LEVEL-AT trial secondary findings.

Longitudinal dyssynchrony correction and 'strain' improvement by comparable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) techniques is unreported. Our purpose was to compare echocardiographic dyssynchrony correction and 'strain' improvement by conduction system pacing (CSP) vs. biventricular pacing (BiVP) as a marker of contractility improvement during 1-year follow-up. A treatment-received analysis was performed in patients included in the LEVEL-AT trial (NCT04054895), randomized to CSP or BiVP, and evaluated at baseline (ON and OFF programming) and at 6 and 12 months (n = 69, 32% women). Analysis included intraventricular (septal flash), interventricular (difference between left and right ventricular outflow times), and atrioventricular (diastolic filling time) dyssynchrony and 'strain' parameters [septal rebound, global longitudinal 'strain' (GLS), LBBB pattern, and mechanical dispersion). Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 27.5 ± 7%, and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) was 138 ± 77 mL, without differences between groups. Longitudinal analysis showed LVEF and LVESV improvement (P < 0.001), without between-group differences. At 12-month follow-up, adjusted mean LVEF was 46% with CSP (95% CI 42.2 and 49.3%) vs. 43% with BiVP (95% CI 39.6 and 45.8%), (P = 0.31), and LVESV was 80 mL (95% CI 55.3 and 104.5 mL) vs. 100 mL (95% CI 78.7 and 121.6 mL), respectively (P = 0.66). Longitudinal analysis showed a significant improvement of all dyssynchrony parameters and GLS over time (P < 0.001), without differences between groups. Baseline GLS significantly correlated with LVEF and LVESV at 12-month follow-up. CSP and BiVP provided similar dyssynchrony and 'strain' correction over time. Baseline global longitudinal 'strain' predicted ventricular remodelling at 12-month follow-up.

Intentional weight loss in overweight and obese patients with heart failure: A systematic review.

Approximately 30-49% of heart failure (HF) patients are living with obesity. The recommended body mass index (BMI) for the general population is 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. The obesity paradox suggests that HF patients with obesity (HFpwO) have a better prognosis compared to normal BMI. Guideline recommendations on ideal BMI for HFpwO are limited. This systematic review aims to examine the evidence base for intentional weight loss in HFpwO on the following parameters: mortality, hospitalization, symptoms, quality of life (QOL), effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and adverse events. A total of 22 studies were identified: lifestyle intervention (n = 9), pharmacotherapy (n = 3), bariatric surgery (n = 10). Mortality and hospitalization, symptoms, QOL, and LVEF were reported in 8, 15 and 14 studies, respectively. All studies had moderate to high risk of bias except one randomized controlled trial (RCT) which evaluated semaglutide in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. Semaglutide resulted in weight loss with improvement in QOL. Lifestyle intervention led to weight loss, minimal adverse events, and improvement in symptoms in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF patients. In six observational studies, bariatric surgery in HFrEF patients achieved weight loss and improvement in LVEF safely in most patients but some patients developed worsening HF perioperatively. There is a need for high-quality adequately powered RCTs on intentional weight loss in HFpwO with survival and hospitalization outcomes. All forms of weight loss intervention studied in this review were likely to result in significant weight loss, improved symptoms and QOL. Careful monitoring is required due to an increase in certain adverse events.

Incidence and Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmia after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) serves as a pivotal therapeutic modality for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and biventricular dyssynchrony. The implementation of CRT not only mitigates the risk of sudden cardiac death but also enhances the overall quality of life. Knowledge concerning the incidence and predictive factors of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) following CRT implantation is invaluable for optimizing future CRT protocols and assessing cost-effectiveness. Materials and Methods: The present research constituted a retrospective cohort analysis with a nested case-control study, conducted between January 2005 and April 2018. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients who experienced heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 35%, displayed a QRS complex duration exceeding 120 milliseconds on electrocardiography, which underwent optimized pharmacological treatment, and subjected to a minimum one-year follow-up post-implantation. Results: One hundred forty-six CRT patients were included, and 47.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.9 to 55.9) VA was detected. The average age at the time of implantation was 64 years. Only male, at 68.5%, was the baseline factor to increase the risk of VA (odds ratio [OR] 2.20, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.53, p=0.031). The other significant predictors for VA included fewer improvements in QRS width or LVEF post-implantation (p&lt;0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Conversely, a reduction of at least 7 milliseconds in QRS width following implantation correlated with a significant decline in VA events (p&lt;0.001), exhibiting a sensitivity of 80.3% and a specificity of 65.7%. Conclusion: In patients who underwent CRT implantation, the risk factors determining the occurrence of VAs included male gender and minimal post-procedural improvements in QRS width or LVEF. On the contrary, a narrowing of the QRS width by more than 7 milliseconds post-implantation was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of ventricular arrhythmic events.

A Comparison of the Association of Septal Scar Burden on Responses to LBBAP-CRT and BVP-CRT

BackgroundLeft bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, despite the presence of left bundle branch block, whether cardiac substrate may influence the effect between the 2 strategies is unclear. ObjectivesThis study aims to assess the association of septal scar on reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes of LBBAP compared with BVP. MethodsWe analyzed patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who had CRT indications undergoing preprocedure cardiac magnetic resonance examination. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and echocardiographic response (ER) (≥5% absolute LVEF increase) were assessed at 6 months. The clinical outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or major ventricular arrhythmia. ResultsThere were 147 patients included (51 LBBAP and 96 BVP). Among patients with low septal scar burden (below median 5.7%, range: 0% to 5.3%), LVEF improvement was higher in the LBBAP than the BVP group (17.5% ± 10.9% vs 12.3% ± 11.8%; P = 0.037), with more than 3-fold increased odds of ER (OR: 4.35; P = 0.033). In high sepal scar subgroups (≥5.7%, range: 5.7%-65.9%), BVP trended towards higher LVEF improvement (9.2% ± 9.4% vs 6.4% ± 12.4%; P = 0.085). Interaction between septal scar burden and pacing strategy was significant for ER (P = 0.002) and LVEF improvement (P = 0.011) after propensity score adjustment. During median follow-up of 33.7 (Q1-Q3: 19.8-42.1) months, the composite clinical outcome occurred in 34.7% (n = 51) of patients. The high-burden subgroups had worse clinical outcomes independent of CRT method. ConclusionsRemodeling response to LBBAP and BVP among nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients is modified by septal scar burden. High septal scar burden was associated with poor clinical prognosis independent of CRT methods.

Predictors of systolic function recovery after atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients

Introduction and ObjectivesAtrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist. AF catheter ablation improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but its impact varies between patients. We aimed to identify predictors of LVEF improvement in HF patients with impaired LVEF undergoing AF ablation. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center study in HF patients with LVEF <50% undergoing AF catheter ablation between May 2016 and May 2022. The primary endpoint was the LVEF recovery rate (‘responders’). Secondary endpoints were one-year safety and effectiveness. We also aimed to validate a prediction model for LVEF recovery. ResultsThe study included 100 patients (79% male, median age 60 years, 70% with probable tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy [TIC], mean LVEF 37%, 29% with paroxysmal AF). After a median follow-up of 12 months after catheter ablation, LVEF improved significantly (36±10% vs. 53±10%, p<0.001), with an 82% responder rate. A suspected diagnosis of TIC (OR 4.916 [95% CI 1.166–20.732], p=0.030), shorter QRS duration (OR 0.969 [95% CI 0.945–0.994], p=0.015), and smaller left ventricle (OR 0.893 [95% CI 0.799–0.999], p=0.049) were independently associated with LVEF improvement. Freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia was 86% (64% under antiarrhythmic drugs), and the rate of adverse events was 2%. The prediction model had a good discriminative performance (AUC 0.814 [95% CI 0.681–0.947]). ConclusionIn AF patients with HF and impaired LVEF, suspected TIC, shorter QRS duration, and smaller LV diameter were associated with LVEF recovery following AF catheter ablation.