Improvement In Disease-free Survival Research Articles

THE EMERGING ROLE OF IMMUNOTHERAPY IN GASTROESOPHAGEAL CANCER: STATE OF ART AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE

The introduction of immunotherapy in the therapeutic algorithm of gastroesophageal cancer is still a debated issue. Recent findings from randomized clinical trials documented the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab in improving disease free survival (DFS) in resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with residual pathologic disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (Check- Mate 577). Consistently, the … Continued

Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing six cycles of FEC-100 to four cycles of AC in women with operable node-negative breast cancer: the NSABP B-36 trial (NRG Oncology).

Results from adjuvant trials evaluating 6 cycles of epirubicin-based chemotherapy regimens suggested these programs may be more effective than 4 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. NSABP B-36 was a phase III clinical trial originally designed as a 2 × 2 factorial study comparing 6 cycles of 5-FU, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-100) to 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with celecoxib or placebo. Shortly after activation, concerns regarding increased cardiovascular risks among selective COX-2 inhibitors resulted in a decision to remove the celecoxib/placebo from the trial. Women with histologically node-negative invasive breast cancer who had undergone primary surgery with a lumpectomy or total mastectomy were eligible. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Between May 2004 and July 2008, 2722 patients were enrolled. Administration of FEC-100 did not result in improvement in DFS compared to AC (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.92-1.29, p value = 0.31). The effect of FEC-100 compared to AC on DFS was significantly different for receptor-positive (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.66) compared to receptor-negative patients (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66-1.11) (treatment-by-receptor status interaction p value = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the effect of treatment on overall survival (OS) with FEC-100 compared to AC (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.84-1.35, p value = 0.61). Overall, Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more frequent in the FEC-100 group. The results of B-36 do not support use of six-cycle anthracycline-based regimens in node-negative breast cancer. Prolongation of anthracycline-based therapy with FEC-100 does not improve DFS or OS, relative to AC for 4 cycles, and was associated with expected increases in toxicity. A statistically significant interaction between treatment and hormone receptor status favoring AC in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers is consistent with the hypothesis that optimal duration of chemotherapy may be four cycles in these patients. Late cardiac events and deaths prior to recurrence or second cancer were infrequent on both arms, but slightly higher with FEC-100. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00087178.

Pembrolizumab as post nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for patients with renal cell carcinoma: Results from 30-month follow-up of KEYNOTE-564.

290 Background: The double-blind, multicenter, randomized KEYNOTE-564 study (NCT03142334) is the first positive phase 3 study of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at intermediate-high or high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy or nephrectomy and resection of metastatic lesions. Adjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in a statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) vs placebo with 24 months of follow-up (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53−0.87; P = 0.0010 [one-sided]). We present updated efficacy and safety results from KEYNOTE-564 with 6 months of additional follow-up. Methods: Pts had histologically confirmed, clear cell RCC (pT2, grade 4 or sarcomatoid, N0 M0; pT3 or pT4, any grade, N0 M0; any pT, any grade, N+ M0; or M1 NED [no evidence of disease after primary tumor and soft tissue metastases completely resected ≤1 year from nephrectomy]) and had undergone surgery ≤12 weeks prior to randomization. The primary endpoint was DFS by investigator assessment in all randomized pts (ITT population). Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint. Safety/tolerability in all treated pts was a secondary endpoint. Results: 994 pts were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab (N = 496) or placebo (N = 498). As of data cutoff date of June 14, 2021, median (range) follow-up, defined as time from randomization to data cutoff, was 30.1 (20.8−47.5) months. In this updated analysis, DFS benefit with pembrolizumab was maintained (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50−0.80; nominal P < 0.0001) and was consistent across subgroups, including pts with M0 disease with intermediate-high risk of recurrence (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52−0.89), M0 high risk of recurrence (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.33−1.10), or M1 NED (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12−0.66). The estimated DFS rate at 24 months was 78.3% with pembrolizumab vs 67.3% with placebo. A total of 66 OS events were observed, 23 in the pembrolizumab arm and 43 in the placebo arm (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31−0.86; P = 0.0048); the p-value did not cross the statistical hypothesis testing boundary and additional follow-up is planned for this key secondary endpoint. The estimated OS rate at 24 months was 96.2% with pembrolizumab vs 93.8% with placebo. With additional follow-up, no increase in any-grade or grade 3-4 adverse events, or steroid use for immune-mediated adverse events was observed. No deaths related to pembrolizumab occurred. Conclusions: At 30 months of follow-up, adjuvant pembrolizumab continued to demonstrate a consistent and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS vs placebo in pts with RCC at high risk of recurrence. No new safety signals were observed with pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03142334.

Analysis of disease-free survival in CheckMate 274 by PD-L1 combined positive score and tumor proportion score.

491 Background: CheckMate 274 demonstrated a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) with nivolumab (NIVO) versus placebo (PBO) both in the intent-to-treat population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 98.22% confidence interval [CI], 0.55–0.90; P < 0.001) and in patients (pts) with tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% assessed by the tumor proportion score (TPS) (HR, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35–0.85; P < 0.001). An exploratory subgroup analysis showed a trend toward a DFS benefit with NIVO in pts with TPS < 1% (0.82; 95% CI, 0.63–1.06). To further characterize the relationship between PD-L1 expression and NIVO efficacy, we report an analysis of DFS based on PD-L1 expression in both tumor and immune cells using the combined positive score (CPS). Methods: CheckMate 274 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of NIVO versus PBO in pts with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery. Pts were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 240 mg or PBO every 2 weeks intravenously for 1 year of adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoints of the study are DFS in the intent-to-treat population and in pts with TPS ≥ 1%. The Dako PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay was used to evaluate TPS. CPS was determined retrospectively from previously stained immunohistochemistry slides using the CPS algorithm. CPS was calculated as the number of both PD-L1 positive tumor and immune cells divided by the number of viable tumor cells in the evaluable tumor area, multiplied by 100; TPS was similarly calculated with the number of PD-L1 positive tumor cells as the numerator. This analysis only included pts with both quantifiable CPS and TPS. Results: Of the 629 pts with quantifiable TPS and CPS, 249 (40%) had TPS ≥ 1% (NIVO, n = 124; PBO, n = 125), 380 (60%) had TPS < 1% (NIVO, n = 191; PBO, n = 189), 557 (89%) had CPS ≥ 1 (NIVO, n = 281; PBO, n = 276), and 72 (11%) had CPS < 1 (NIVO, n = 34; PBO, n = 38). Within TPS < 1% pts, 81% (n = 309) had CPS ≥ 1. The number of pts and the DFS outcomes in pts with TPS ≥ 1% and CPS ≥ 1 are shown in the Table. In pts with TPS < 1% who also had CPS ≥ 1, median DFS (95% CI) was 19.2 (15.6–33.4) months with NIVO versus 10.1 (8.2–19.4) months with PBO. The HR for NIVO versus PBO in these pts was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.54–0.99). Conclusions: This exploratory analysis of PD-L1 expression by CPS showed a higher proportion of pts with CPS ≥ 1 than TPS ≥ 1%, and that most pts with TPS < 1% had CPS ≥ 1. In the CPS ≥ 1 subgroup, median DFS with NIVO was more than double that with placebo. These results support the conclusion that pts with TPS < 1% also benefit from adjuvant NIVO. Clinical trial information: NCT02632409. [Table: see text]

Abstract OT1-08-01: Concurrent versus sequential chemo-endocrine therapy in er positive and her2 negative non-metastatic breast cancer- an open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background-Traditionally, endocrine therapy follows chemotherapy for hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer (BC) in the adjuvant setting. Concurrent chemo-hormonal therapy fell into disrepute due to previous studies showing a probable, small detriment in survival. (Albain et al, Lancet, 2009; Bedognetti et al, JNCI, 2009; Pico et al, Ann Oncol, 2004) However, the early studies are fraught with biases. The biological rationale was that endocrine therapy is cytostatic, pushing cancer cells into G0 phase which was feared to reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy which is known to act best on rapidly dividing cells. Thus, the two mechanisms of actions were thought to be antagonistic. However, this fear may be irrational and evidence at molecular level is contradictory. The current sequential strategy delays the start of an equally effective treatment modality in HR+ BC patients. Recent studies have shown that concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy is safe in metastatic HR+ setting. (Sledge et al, J Clin Oncol, 2000) One also needs to rethink neoadjuvant strategies in these patients to improve the current dismal pathological complete response (pCR) rates in this subset. (Cortazar et al, Lancet, 2014) Concurrent treatment seems to have improved pCR rate. (Sagiu K et al, Acta Med Okayama, 2015) Here, we describe a phase III, randomized study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. (CTRI/2018/09/015643) Aims and Objectives- The primary objective is to assess the improvement in disease-free survival by administering concurrent versus sequential, (neo) adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy in HR+, HER2 negative, non-metastatic BC. The secondary objectives are to assess improvement in overall survival, pCR rates, breast conservation rates. Biomarkers of response to treatment and tumour dormancy in HR+ BC will be studied in a subset of patients.Patients and methods-This is a prospective, open label study where non-metastatic, biopsy proven, HR+, HER2- BC patients who warrant chemotherapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting are considered. The study started accrual in December 2018 and 285 patients are randomized till date. Pregnant or lactating women and those with inflammatory breast carcinoma are excluded. After obtaining informed consent, patients are randomized to receive concurrent versus sequential chemo-endocrine treatment. Patients will receive all chemo and endocrine therapy as per the institutional standard protocols otherwise. Stratification criteria are neoadjuvant vs adjuvant therapy, pre vs postmenopausal status, node positive vs node negative status, 1st gen (anthracyclines alone) versus 2nd gen (including taxanes) chemotherapy. A two-sided log-rank test with an overall sample size of 2316 (2432 with a 5% dropout rate) (1158 in control and 1158 in treatment group) achieves 80% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect a hazard ratio of 0.80 when the proportion surviving in the control group is 0.70. An interim with respect to safety is planned in the protocol. Expected results and conclusion-Ours is a large, prospective trial evaluating the efficacy of concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy in HR+ BC patients. This has the potential to improve pCR rates in the neoadjuvant setting and change the standard of care in the management of HR+ BC patients. The biomarker analysis will help us further understand the biology of HR+ BC and shed light upon tumour dormancy signatures. Citation Format: Shalaka Joshi, Sridevi Murali-Nanavati, Vaibhav Vanmali, Rohini Hawaldar, Mujahid Gafur Shaikh, Mohammad Sadique Ansari, Sushmita Rath, Jaya Ghosh, Seema Gulia, Jyoti Bajpayi, Nita Nair, Vani Parmar, Purvi Thakkar, Garvit Chitkara, Tanuja Shet, Sangeeta Desai, Ayushi Sahay, Sudeep Gupta, Rajendra Badwe. Concurrent versus sequential chemo-endocrine therapy in er positive and her2 negative non-metastatic breast cancer- an open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-08-01.

Efficacy and Safety of Midostaurin Combined with Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia with FLT3 Mutation

Background. The detection of FLT3-ITD mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is associated with poor prognosis and is an indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the first remission. Midostaurin is the first FLT3 inhibitor approved for the treatment of AML patients with FLT3 mutation in the Russian Federation in November 2019. This study deals with the initial experiences of using midostaurin in several centers for hematology in the Russian Federation. Aim. To analyze the initial experiences of using midostaurin at different stages of AML therapy. Materials & Methods. The study enrolled 42 patients with newly diagnosed AML with FLT3 mutation, who were treated with midostaurin combined with chemotherapy. Allo-HSCT was performed in 11 patients. Results. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 51 %, and the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) was 45 %. After achieving remission, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 58 %. The 1-year DFS of allo-HSCT recipients was 86 % (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 60-100 %) vs. 66 % in patients treated with chemotherapy without allo-HSCT (95% CI 34-98 %), respectively (p = 0.5). Hyperleukocytosis at disease onset was associated with high relapse risk. Midostaurin had to be discontinued in 5 % of cases due to atrial fibrillation and QTc prolongation. Conclusion. The present study demonstrates the safety and importance of including midostaurin in the regimens for treating AML with FLT3 mutation. Midostaurin assignment for maintenance therapy, after allo-HSCT as well as without performing it, can result in considerable improvement of OS and DFS.

The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

The controversy over the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has existed for a long time. The present study reassessed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) data to investigate whether PORT can improve survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The following databases were used to perform literature search: PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Embase (from January 1, 1986 to July 5, 2021). The results of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated as hazard ratio (HR). Confidence intervals are chosen with 95% confidence intervals. A total of 12 RCTs and 19 retrospective cohort studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. A significant DFS improvement was detected in the PORT group (4111 patients from 15 studies), although statistical difference was not detected for OS between the non-PORT and PORT groups (31 studies, 49,342 total patients). PORT prolonged OS in patients undergoing PORT plus postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and in pN2 patients. Patients with a median radiation dose of 50.4 Gy and a median radiation dose of 54 Gy had a better OS after PORT. However, if the total radiotherapy dose went up to 60 Gy, PORT increased the risk of death in NSCLC patients. Significant difference in OS was not found in the results of studies with regard to treatment methods, pathologic stages, study type, radiation beam quality, and radiation dose. Patients undergoing postoperative chemoradiotherapy and pN2 patients can benefit from PORT. Patients exposed to median radiation doses of 50.4 and 54 Gy demonstrated relatively good efficacy. For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, PORT has not been proven to extend OS, but its effect on DFS remains strong.

Prognostic Role of PD-L1 Expression in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Simple SummaryThe role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS; however, there was no significant improvement in DFS. PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been investigated in various types of cancer; however, the role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. A total of 965 articles were included from CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Of these, 22 studies encompassing 6468 cases of invasive breast cancer were included in the systematic review, and 15 articles were included in the meta-analysis. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.26–3.52; p =< 0.000); however, there was no significant improvement in DFS (HR 0.17; 95% CI −0.12–0.46; p =< 0.252). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.

Impact of cumulative cisplatin dose in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a real-world study

BackgroundWe aimed to comprehensively investigate the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CC-CCD) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC) with different tumor responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).MethodsPatients with CA-LANPC who underwent NAC followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Evaluation of tumor response in patients was conducted by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 after two to four cycles NAC. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for prognosis. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to classify participates and predict disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsOne hundred and thirty-two patients with favorable response after NAC were included. The median CC-CCD was 163 mg/m2 (IQR, 145–194 mg/m2), and 160 mg/m2 was selected as the cutoff point to group patients into low and high CC-CCD groups (< 160 vs. ≥ 160 mg/m2). There was significant improvement in 5-year DFS (91.2% vs. 72.6%; P = 0.003) for patients receiving high CC-CCD compared to those receiving low CC-CCD. Multivariate analysis revealed that CC-CCD, T stage, and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA were independent prognostic factors for DFS (P < 0.05 for all). Patients were further categorized into two prognostic groups by RPA: the low-risk group (T1-3 disease with regardless of EBV DNA, and T4 disease with EBV DNA < 4000 copy/mL), and the high-risk group (T4 disease with EBV DNA ≥ 4000 copy/mL). Significant 5-year DFS improvement was observed for the high-risk group (P = 0.004) with high CC-CCD. However, DFS improvement was relatively insignificant in the low-risk group (P = 0.073).ConclusionsCC-CCD was a positive prognostic factor for responders after NAC in CA-LANPC. Furthermore, CC-CCD ≥ 160 mg/m2 could significantly improve DFS in the high-risk group with CA-LANPC, but the benefit of high CC-CCD in the low-risk group needs further study.

Postoperative Chemotherapy Use and Outcomes From ADAURA: Osimertinib as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

IntroductionAdjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients with resected stages II to IIIA (and select IB) NSCLC; however, recurrence rates are high. In the phase 3 ADAURA study (NCT02511106), osimertinib was found to have a clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resected stages IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC. Here, we report prespecified and exploratory analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes from ADAURA. MethodsPatients with resected stages IB to IIIA EGFRm NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib or placebo for 3 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy before randomization was not mandatory, per physician and patient choice. DFS in the overall population (IB–IIIA), with and without adjuvant chemotherapy, was a prespecified analysis. Exploratory analyses included the following: adjuvant chemotherapy use by patient age, disease stage, and geographic location; DFS by adjuvant chemotherapy use and disease stage. ResultsOverall, 410 of 682 patients (60%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (osimertinib, n = 203; placebo, n = 207) for a median duration of 4.0 cycles. Adjuvant chemotherapy use was more frequent in patients: aged less than 70 years (338 of 509; 66%) versus more than or equal to 70 years (72 of 173; 42%); with stages II to IIIA (352 of 466; 76%) versus stage IB (57 of 216; 26%); and enrolled in Asia (268 of 414; 65%) versus outside of Asia (142 of 268; 53%). A DFS benefit favoring osimertinib versus placebo was observed in patients with (DFS hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.10–0.26) and without adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.13–0.40), regardless of disease stage. ConclusionsThese findings support adjuvant osimertinib as an effective treatment for patients with stages IB to IIIA EGFRm NSCLC after resection, with or without previous adjuvant chemotherapy.

Does three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy provide benefits for all childhood patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

Adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the main strategy in treatment of children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC). Yet, an optimal number of NAC cycles remains unknown. We aimed to optimize the NAC cycle and potentially contribute to clinical decision making for the individual treatment of CA-LANPC. Utilizing an NPC-specific database through an acknowledged big-data information system at our center, we identified 143 CA-LANPC treated with NAC followed by CCRT between September 2007 through April 2018. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to categorize the patients and predict disease-free survival (DFS). The clinical benefits of NAC cycles (two cycles vs three cycles) were assessed in each risk group. Independent factors derived from multivariable analysis to predict DFS were T stage (T1-3 vs T4) and plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA (< 4000 vs ≥ 4000 copies/mL) for risk stratification. Consequently, 87 (61%) participants were classified as low-risk group (T1-3 with low or high EBV DNA, and T4 with low EBV DNA) and the other 56 patients (39%) were classified as a high-risk group (T4 with high EBV DNA) through RPA, and corresponding 5-year DFS rates of 91.9% and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the high-risk group, patients receiving three cycles of NAC had statistically significant improvement in 5-year DFS over those who received two cycles of NAC (86.7% vs 59.1%; p = 0.020), while the survival benefit of three cycles NAC for low-risk groups were not observed (94.7% vs 89.7%; p = 0.652). We found three cycles of NAC with CCRT was a positive prognostic indicator for improved DFS for the high-risk group among CA-LANPC. However, whether low-risk patients could benefit from three cycles NAC needs further study.

Survival outcome and treatment tolerability for postmenopausal females with early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer treated with different adjuvant hormonal lines (TAM vs. AI vs. switching strategy) for 5 years

Abstract Background The standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal female patients with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer was 5 years of tamoxifen, but recurrence and side effects restrict its usefulness. The aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole or exemestane or letrozole) was compared with tamoxifen for 5 years or started after completing 2-3 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal female patients diagnosed with early breast cancer at "Ain Shams University Hospitals" Objective The aim of the study was to measure survival outcome and treatment tolerability for postmenopausal females with Hormone Receptor Positive early breast cancer who received adjuvant hormonal treatment with tamoxifen [TAM] only for 5 years versus those who received adjuvant hormonal treatment with tamoxifen [TAM] for 2 years switching to aromatase inhibitors [AI] in the sequential 3 years versus those who received adjuvant hormonal treatment with aromatase inhibitors [AI] solely for 5 years. Patients and methods This study included 100 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who presented at the Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, in the interval from January 2010 until December 2015. Conclusion Similar disease free survival and overall survival were observed among the three studied groups. Switching tamoxifen to aromatase inhibitors provides better tolerability in terms of endometrial thickness when compared to 5 years of tamoxifen monotherapy. Patients who administer aromatase inhibitor included in the switching strategy experience less osteoporosis and less generalized bone pain compared to upfront aromatase inhibitor to 5 years. There was a significant improvement of disease free survival (DFS) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2) negative patients receiving any adjuvant hormonal treatment line for five years in comparison to HER 2 positive patients receiving the same adjuvant hormonal treatment for five years.

JIES01.04 Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Lung Cancer: Where We Are

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been used in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to reduce the high risk (∼60%) of brain metastases in these patients. Early trials on PCI have focused on patients in complete remission after treatment for limited stage (LS). Individual studies showed unequivocally a significant reduction in the risk of brain metastases, but a survival benefit was only seen in a meta-analysis [1]. In this analysis. An absolute increase in survival rate of 5.4% at 3 years [1]. The vast majority of patients in these studies had a complete remission (often based on chest radiographs) after chemotherapy. Based on these studies, PCI became part of standard treatment of LS-SCLC patients with a complete response. To reduce the risk of neurocognitive toxicity, PCI was not simultaneously given with chemotherapy and started within 6 weeks after last chemotherapy. A study on the effectiveness of higher dose PCI (36 Gy) showed no benefit over standard dose (25 Gy) PCI [2]. Since most patients with SCLC present with extensive stage (ES) disease, and the risk of brain metastases is even higher in this group of patients, the EORTC performed a study on PCI in patients with any response after chemotherapy for ES-SCLC. In this trial, PCI not only significantly reduced the risk of symptomatic brain metastases (15 vs 40%), but also significantly improved survival (1 year survival 27 vs 13%) [3]. This study was pragmatic and in line with existing guidelines not to repeat brain imaging and to focus on symptomatic disease. It was argued that some individuals with asymptomatic, but radiologically detectable brain metastases may have been included in the study and that could, at least partially, have contributed to the outcome. In a Japanese study on PCI in ES-SCLC patients, all patients had a brain MRI to excluded presence of asymptomatic brain metastases [4]. In addition, regular brain MR imaging was performed during follow-up and when appropriate, brain metastases that appeared were treated. The study showed a significant reduction in the rate of brain metastases when using PCI (33 vs 59%), but no survival benefit. In the observation arm that did not receive PCI, many patients (83%) who developed brain metastases were treated with radiotherapy [4]. A SWOG trial (SWOG 1827/”MAVERICK”) has opened in 2020 to compare a strategy of MRI surveillance with early treatment to MRI surveillance with PCI. Interestingly, this study is not only enrolling patients with ES-SCLC but also with LS-SCLC. In it well known that the disease SCLC and PCI can be associated with cognitive decline. Studies aiming at sparing brain regions involved in memory and cognitive functions, esp. hippocampal region, led to attempt of using hippocampal avoiding PCI (HA-PCI). Whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance was associated with better preservation of memory and quality of life [5]. Studies on the benefit of HA-PCI are less conclusive [6,7] and the results of an ongoing trails (NRG CC003) are awaited. In conclusion, PCI is very effective in reducing the risk of brain metastases in SCLC. There are questions whether the beneficial effect on survival is maintained in the era of MR screening and MR surveillance with early treatment of (asymptomatic) brain metastases. Studies to re-evaluate the role of PCI in the current era of immunotherapy are underway. In the meantime, PCI or MRI surveillance should be considered guideline-recommended treatment. In NSCLC, the role of PCI was also addressed in a number of studies. In a recent trial with long term follow-up (NRG/RTOG0214) and a meta-analyses, earlier findings of a significant reduction in the rate of brain metastases, improvement in diseasefree survival, but absence of improved overall survival after PCI, were confirmed [8,9]. Literature 1. Auperin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, et al. N Engl J Med 341, 476-84, 1999. 2. Le Pechoux C, Dunant A, Senan S, et al. Lancet Oncol 10, 467-74, 2009. 3. Slotman BJ. Faivre-Finn C, Kramer G, et al. N Engl J Med 357, 664-72, 2007. 4. Takahashi T, Yamanaka T, Seto T, et al. Lancet Oncol 18, 663-71, 2017. 5. Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA. J Clin Oncol 3, 3810-6, 2014. 6. De Dios ND, Counago F, Lopez JL, et al., Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 105, S35-6, 2019. 7. Belderbos JS, De Ruysscher DK, de Jaeger K, et al. T Thor Oncol 16, 840-9, 2021. 8. Sun A, Hu C, Wong SJ. JAMA Oncol 5, 847-55, 2019. 9. Witlox WJA, Ramaekers BLT, Lacas B, et al., Radiother Oncol. 158, 40-7. 2021. brain metastases, PCI, prophylactic cranial irradiation

ES13.04 What Evidence Level is Enough for Approval and Reimbursement of Novel Cancer Drugs? Lessons from Lung Cancer

ES13.04 What Evidence Level is Enough for Approval and Reimbursement of Novel Cancer Drugs? Lessons from Lung Cancer

142 A RANDOMIZED TRIAL: THREE-FILED LYMPHADENECTOMY COMPARED WITH TWO-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR MIDDLE AND LOWER THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract Esophagectomy combined with radical lymphadenectomy is widely accepted, but the role of three-field lymphadenectomy (3-FLD) remains unclear. Methods We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with resectable cancer of the middle or lower third of the esophagus. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo esophagectomy with either 3-FLD (cervical-thoracic-abdominal lymphadenectomy) or two-field lymphadenectomy (thoracic-abdominal lymphadenectomy, 2-FLD) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Analysis were done according to the intent-to-treat principle. Results Postoperative complications were similar in the two arms. More lymph nodes were resected in 3-field arm (Median, 37 vs. 24 [2-FLD], P &amp;lt; 0.001), 43 (21.5%) patients had cervical LNM. More pN3 patients were identified in the 3-FLD arm (10.5%, 21/200 vs. 5.0%, 10/200 [2-FLD], P = 0.040). The cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS) was comparable between the two arms (HR, 1.021, 95%CI, 0.735–1.417, P = 0.903), as well as the OS (HR, 1.026, 95%CI, 0.694–1.515, P = 0.899). The cumulative 5-year DFS was 52% in the 3-FLD arm, as compared with 53% in the 2-FLD arm; 5-year OS rates were 64% and 62%. Conclusion Three-field lymphadenectomy offered more accurate nodal staging without increasing the surgical complications. Comparing with radical 2-FLD, there was no improvement in OS or DFS after 3-FLD for patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer. .

1381P Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT): 14-month follow-up of CheckMate 577

The risk of recurrence after neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery (trimodality therapy) remains high in EC/GEJC. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) was demonstrated for nivolumab vs placebo (median, 22.4 vs 11.0 months [mo]; HR 0.69; 96.4% CI 0.56–0.86; P = 0.0003) with a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with resected EC/GEJC who received neoadjuvant CRT in the global, randomized, phase III CheckMate 577 study. Here, we report efficacy and safety with an additional 8 mo follow-up.

1152P Real-world outcomes in resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR mutated NSCLC in Canada: Analysis from the POTENT study

Among patient (pts) who have advanced NSCLC with EGFR driver mutations (EGFRm), most benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The ADAURA trial showed significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) with the addition of the EGFR TKI, osimertinib, in resected early stage (IB-IIIA) EGFRm NSCLC pts. The objective of the POTENT study was to estimate EGFRm prevalence and assess outcomes in resected early stage EGFRm NSCLC in real-world setting in Canada.

PLLBA-01 PEMBROLIZUMAB (PEMBRO) VS PLACEBO AS POST NEPHRECTOMY ADJUVANT THERAPY FOR PATIENTS (pts) WITH RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (RCC): RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PHASE 3 KEYNOTE-564 STUDY

PLLBA-01 PEMBROLIZUMAB (PEMBRO) VS PLACEBO AS POST NEPHRECTOMY ADJUVANT THERAPY FOR PATIENTS (pts) WITH RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (RCC): RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PHASE 3 KEYNOTE-564 STUDY

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab after Nephrectomy in Renal-Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundPatients with renal-cell carcinoma who undergo nephrectomy have no options for adjuvant therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence that have high levels of supporting evidence.MethodsIn a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who were at high risk for recurrence after nephrectomy, with or without metastasectomy, to receive either adjuvant pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) or placebo intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles (approximately 1 year). The primary end point was disease-free survival according to the investigator’s assessment. Overall survival was a key secondary end point. Safety was a secondary end point.ResultsA total of 496 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab, and 498 to receive placebo. At the prespecified interim analysis, the median time from randomization to the data-cutoff date was 24.1 months. Pembrolizumab therapy was associated with significantly longer disease-free survival than placebo (disease-free survival at 24 months, 77.3% vs. 68.1%; hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.87; P=0.002 [two-sided]). The estimated percentage of patients who remained alive at 24 months was 96.6% in the pembrolizumab group and 93.5% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.96). Grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 32.4% of the patients who received pembrolizumab and in 17.7% of those who received placebo. No deaths related to pembrolizumab therapy occurred.ConclusionsPembrolizumab treatment led to a significant improvement in disease-free survival as compared with placebo after surgery among patients with kidney cancer who were at high risk for recurrence. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; KEYNOTE-564 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03142334.)

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival and recurrence in patients with parotid gland cancer.

To develop nomograms for predicting recurrence risk and long-term survival in patients with parotid gland cancer (PGC). A total of 301 consecutive patients with PGC who underwent surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into a training cohort (n=210) and a validation cohort (n=91). Predictive nomograms were constructed based on the independent indicators of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The discrimination and calibration of nomograms were evaluated using C-indices and calibration curves. Six independent predictors of OS were identified. Incorporating these factors, the nomogram showed good concordance statistics of 0.84 and 0.78 in predicting the 5-year OS in the training and validation cohorts. Five independent predictors of DFS were identified and integrated into the nomogram. The concordance statistics were 0.84 and 0.74 in predicting the 5-year DFS in the training and validation cohorts. The predictive performance of the nomograms outperformed the TNM model. Additionally, the patients were divided into two groups according to the nomogram score, and significant differences in OS and DFS were observed between the high risk and low risk groups. Finally, the role of postoperative treatments was evaluated based on the risk stratification; patients at high risk of disease recurrence showed an improvement in DFS after receiving postoperative treatments. The nomogram showed good performance in predicting both OS and DFS in patients with PGC. It might be useful for selecting patients for postoperative treatments.