Summary Zirconization creates a sustainable manufacturing process that is free of phosphates and minimizes water, chemical, and energy usage while maintaining and/or improving quality standards. Certainly, some people will contend there are some advantages to traditional phosphate chemistry. First, it is readily available and is likely what a company is using now, and there is a comfort zone in dealing with a proven process. Second, the number of people available in the marketplace that have worked with traditional phosphate chemistry is large compared to those who have any experience in the newer transitional metal chemistry. Finally, change is difficult because people inherently do not like it and there may be circumstances where it is difficult because of approvals or specifications. As an example, contracts may call for resubmission of parts if a new process is adopted that could affect the quality of the parts. If the change is for something that is too new, the customer may also have misgivings, which makes it complicated for the supplier to make an alteration. However, the benefits will likely outweigh the costs of change. Hank Jeanneret, group vice president, Commercial Vehicle Products, Leggett & Platt, a pioneer in the use of transition metal-based chemistry, put it this way: “It is a much less expensive approach to the preparation of our parts for finishing at an increased throughput, with benefits in reduced energy and water consumption and the closure of source of liquid discharge and solid waste from the plant, thereby simplifying our environmental reporting and reducing compliance costs.” In one five-month study on a production line operating five and a half days a week at 20 hours a day, one user realized an annualized reduction in total process costs from $55,000 to $21,000 (Fig. 18). Ted Schreyer, vice president of operations for a custom coater, has experienced the benefits of utilizing the Ziroconization process. “Given the process efficiencies, environmental and cost trade-offs, I cannot foresee any reason to ever switch back to iron phosphate,” he said. To be certain, the Zirconization Process will not be appropriate for all manufacturers, but it is a process that you can ill afford to not consider.