Important Adverse Events Research Articles

Association between procedure duration and adverse events in congenital cardiac catheterization.

Procedure duration is an important predictor of patient outcomes in surgery. However, the relationship between procedure duration and adverse events in congenital cardiac catheterization is largely unexplored. All cases entered into the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes from 2014 to 2017 were included. Cases were ordered from shortest to longest case length, minus time spent managing adverse events, for each case type. The outcomes, Level 3bc/4/5 and 4/5 adverse event rates, were calculated for cases above and below the 75th percentile for case length. To identify an independent relationship between case length and outcomes, the case length percentile was added to the CHARM II risk model. Among 14,704 catheterizations, longer cases (>75th percentile for case length) had Level 4/5 rates that were 2.2% and 2.7% compared to cases ≤75th percentile with adverse event rates of 0.9% and 1.4% for diagnostic and interventional cases, respectively. Level 3bc/4/5 rates were 5.0% and 8.4% in longer cases compared to 2.4% and 5.4% for diagnostic and interventional cases, respectively. After adding case length to the CHARM II risk model, case length 50th-75th percentile had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.4, 75th-90th percentile an OR of 1.56, and >90th percentile an OR of 2.24 as compared to cases with case length <50th percentile (p ≤ 0.001 for all). Longer case lengths are associated with clinically important and life-threatening adverse events in congenital cardiac catheterization, even after accounting for known risk factors. Case length may be an important target for future quality improvement work.

Assessment of distributions and gender difference in adverse events related to faricimab: a real-world study based on FDA adverse event reporting system

ABSTRACT Background Faricimab is a novel bispecific antibody drug for treating retinal disease. We aim to study the adverse events of faricimab based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Research design and methods The FAERS data from 2020 to 2024 was extracted to conduct disproportionality analysis. The risk signals were mined by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Results A total of 1401 cases with adverse events were reported. Eye disorders were the most frequent AEs. New ocular AEs were identified, such as diplopia, metamorphopsia, blindness transient, visual field defect, subretinal fibrosis. New non-ocular AEs were also found such as cellulitis, acute respiratory failure, end stage renal disease, proteinuria, nephropathy, VIth nerve paralysis, and deafness. It was found that there is a difference between men and women on the ocular adverse events. Adverse events happened in the initial month of the treatment, but mostly happened between the 91 to180 days. Conclusions Faricimab have ocular and non-ocular adverse events, in which some ocular adverse events differ across genders. Important potential adverse events should be considered in the clinical practice to provide better individualized treatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated bullous pemphigoid: Aretrospective and real-world study based on the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

This study aimed to describe bullous pemphigoid (BP) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reported in the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS). We obtained reports of ICI-associated BP from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2024 in the FAERS database. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) method of the disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the potential risk for ICI-associated BP. We also described the clinical characteristics of ICI-associated BP and evaluated the time to onset (TTO) of BP developed after treatment with ICIs. Eight hundred and six cases of ICI-associated BP were gathered, in which 56.58% of the patients were aged 65 years or older. The majority of patients were male, accounting for 68.49% of all cases. The prevalent potential cancer type was skin cancer (31.64%). The results of the disproportionality analysis showed that males (ROR = 2.10 [1.78-2.49]), patients aged 65 or older (ROR = 2.13 [1.79-2.55]), and patients with skin cancer (ROR = 2.08 [1.80-2.43]) were more likely to develop ICI-associated BP. In comparison to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitor and programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor, programmed cell death 1 inhibitor-associated BP has a higher risk of development (ROR = 24.45 [22.52-26.56]). ICI-associated BP had a median TTO of 204 days (interquartile range 57-426 days). ICI-associated BP is a rare but important immune-related adverse event. Our study provided helpful information to help medical professionals further understand ICI-associated BP.

Myocarditis Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination.

Myocarditis after the COVID-19 vaccine is one of the important adverse events following immunization, observed mainly after mRNA-based vaccines. Importantly, post-vaccination myocarditis was less common than myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection, as it was scored at 19.7 per 1,000,000 doses and 2.76 per 1000 infections. Predominantly, its course was benign and, compared with the myocarditis after COVID-19 infection, significantly fewer patients developed heart failure or died among patients with post-vaccination myocarditis. The group at highest risk of myocarditis related to COVID-19 vaccination were young males who received a second dose of an mRNA vaccine. It was observed that, among mRNA vaccines, specifically mRNA-1273 was associated with a higher risk of myocarditis. The mechanism underlying myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination is still under investigation and certain processes are being considered. Currently, some follow-up assessments of patients who developed vaccine-induced myocarditis are available and suggest a favorable prognosis. The aim of this review is to discuss the most recent data on myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination considering its epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, relative risk of myocarditis compared with SARS-CoV-2 infection, potential underlying mechanism, and follow-up data of patients who developed post-vaccination myocarditis.

Risk factors for relapse of immune-related pneumonitis after 6-week oral prednisolone therapy: a follow-up analysis of a phase II study.

Immune-related pneumonitis (irP) is one of the most important immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). After corticosteroid therapy irP frequently relapses, which can interfere with cancer therapy. However, risk factors for irP relapse are unknown. This study was a follow-up analysis of a phase II study that evaluated 56 patients with grade ≥ 2 irP treated with oral prednisolone, 1mg/kg/day, tapered over 6 weeks. Clinical factors including patient characteristics, blood test findings, and response to prednisolone therapy were assessed to identify risk factors for irP relapse using the Fine-Gray test. Among 56 patients with irP, 22 (39.3%) experienced irP relapse after 6 weeks of prednisolone therapy during the follow-up observation period. Radiographic organising pneumonia (OP) pattern and duration to irP onset ≥ 100 days from ICI initiation were determined to be significant risk factors for irP relapse in a multivariate Fine-Gray test (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.17, 95% CI 1.37-7.32, p = 0.007, and HR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.01-6.74, p = 0.048, respectively). Other patient characteristics, blood test findings, irP severity, and response to prednisolone therapy were not associated with irP relapse. In irP patients treated with 6-week prednisolone tapering therapy, OP pattern and duration to irP onset ≥ 100 days were associated with relapse risk. Assessment of the risk factors for irP relapse will be helpful for irP management.

Public Preference for Off-Label Use of Drugs for Cancer Treatment and Relative Importance of Associated Adverse Events: A Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling.

Patients may get more treatment options with off-label use of drugs while exposed to unknown risks of adverse events. Little is known about the public or demand-side perspective on off-label drug use, which is important to understand how to use off-label treatment and devise financial assistance. This study aimed to quantify public preference for off-label cancer treatment outcomes, process, and costs, and perceived importance of associated adverse events. A discrete choice experiment and a best-worst scaling were conducted in Hong Kong in December 2022. Quota sampling was used to randomly select the study sample from a territory-wide panel of working-age adults. Preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment effectiveness, risk of adverse events, mode of drug administration, and availability of off-label treatment guidelines were estimated using a random parameter logit model and latent class model. The relative importance of different adverse events was elicited using Case 1 best-worst scaling. A total of 435 respondents provided valid responses. In the discrete choice experiment, the respondents indicated that extra overall survival as treatment effectiveness (WTP: HK$448,000/US$57,400 for 12-month vs 3-month extra survival) was the most important attribute for off-label drugs, followed by the risk of adverse events (WTP: HK$318,000/US$40,800 for 10% chance to have adverse event vs 55%), mode of drug administration (WTP: HK$42,000/US$5300 for oral intake vs injection), and availability of guidelines (WTP: HK$31,000/US$4000 for available versus not available). Four groups with distinct preferences were identified, including effectiveness oriented, off-label use refusal, oral intake oriented, and adverse event risk aversion. In the best-worse scaling, hypothyroidism, nausea/vomiting, and arthralgia/joint pain were the three most important adverse events based on the perceptions of respondents. Risk-averse respondents, who were identified from the discrete choice experiment, had different perceived importance of the adverse events compared with those with other preferences. Knowing the preference and WTP for cancer treatment-related characteristics from a societal perspective facilitates doctors' communications with patients on decision making and treatment goal-setting for off-label treatment, and enables devising financial assistance for related treatments. This study also provides important insight to inform evaluations of public acceptance and information dissemination in drug development as well as future economic evaluations.

Weight loss and dysgeusia in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with talquetamab.

Talquetamab is an approved therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. This study examined dysgeusia and weight loss occurrences, alongside investigating symptom reversibility post-treatment cessation. Dysgeusia was prevalent, persisting in 15% of patients. On average, patients lost 6% of their weight during treatment, with weight loss persisting in about half of the patients post-discontinuation. Weight loss and dysgeusia are important adverse events to consider while on talquetamab treatment. Extending dose intervals can potentially prevent such adverse events and should be studied in future prospective clinical trials.

When, Why and How to Re-challenge Clozapine in Schizophrenia Following Myocarditis.

Clozapine-induced myocarditis (CIM) is among the most important adverse events limiting the use of clozapine as the most effective treatment for schizophrenia. CIM necessitates the immediate termination of clozapine, often resulting in its permanent discontinuation with considerable detrimental effects on patients' psychopathology and long-term outcome. Consequently, a clozapine re-challenge after CIM is increasingly regarded as a viable alternative, with published reports indicating a success rate of approximately 60%. However, published cases of re-challenges after CIM remain limited. Here, we provide a narrative review of the current state of research regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis and clinical management of CIM as well as a synthesis of current recommendations for re-challenging patients after CIM. This includes a step-by-step guide for this crucial procedure based on the current evidence regarding the pathophysiology and risk factors for CIM. Slow dose titration regimes and addressing risk factors including concomitant valproate and olanzapine are crucial both to prevent CIM and to ensure a safe and successful re-challenge. Furthermore, we discuss the utility of C-reactive protein, troponin, N-terminal-pro hormone and brain natriuretic peptide, therapeutic drug-monitoring and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for CIM screening and diagnosis as well as for post-CIM re-challenges.

Anticoagulants Are a Risk Factor for Delayed Bleeding after Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A HASID Multicenter Study

Introduction: Delayed bleeding is an important adverse event following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, whether anticoagulants are risk factors for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD remains debatable. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,708 patients who underwent colorectal ESDs between January 2015 and December 2020 at five academic medical centers in South Korea. We aimed to identify the risk factors for delayed bleeding in patients after colorectal ESD and, in particular, to evaluate the effect of anticoagulants. Results: Delayed bleeding occurred in 40 of 1,708 patients (2.3%). The risk factors for delayed bleeding were antithrombotic agents (odds ratio [OR], 6.155; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.201–11.825; p < 0.001), antiplatelet agents (OR, 4.609; 95% CI, 2.200–9.658; p < 0.001), anticoagulants (OR, 8.286; 95% CI, 2.934–23.402; p < 0.001), and tumor location in the rectum (OR, 2.055; 95% CI, 1.085–3.897; p = 0.027). In the analysis that excluded patients taking antiplatelet agents, the delayed bleeding rate was higher in patients taking anticoagulants (1.6% no antithrombotic agents vs. 12.5% taking anticoagulants, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the delayed bleeding rate (4.2% direct oral anticoagulants vs. 25.0% warfarin, p = 0.138) or clinical outcomes according to the type of anticoagulant used. Conclusions: Anticoagulants use was a risk factor for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD, and there was no difference in the risk of delayed bleeding based on the type of anticoagulant used. Colorectal ESD in patients receiving anticoagulants requires careful observation and management for delayed bleeding.

Deep learning-based quantification of osteonecrosis using magnetic resonance images in Gaucher disease

Gaucher disease is one of the most common lysosomal storage disorders. Osteonecrosis is a principal clinical manifestation of Gaucher disease and often leads to joint collapse and fractures. T1-weighted (T1w) modality in MRI is widely used to monitor bone involvement in Gaucher disease and to diagnose osteonecrosis. However, objective and quantitative methods for characterizing osteonecrosis are still limited. In this work, we present a deep learning-based quantification approach for the segmentation of osteonecrosis and the extraction of characteristic parameters. We first constructed two independent U-net models to segment the osteonecrosis and bone marrow unaffected by osteonecrosis (UBM) in spine and femur respectively, based on T1w images from patients in the UK national Gaucherite study database. We manually delineated parcellation maps including osteonecrosis and UBM from 364 T1w images (176 for spine, 188 for femur) as the training datasets, and the trained models were subsequently applied to all the 917 T1w images in the database. To quantify the segmentation, we calculated morphological parameters including the volume of osteonecrosis, the volume of UBM, and the fraction of total marrow occupied by osteonecrosis. Then, we examined the correlation between calculated features and the bone marrow burden score for marrow infiltration of the corresponding image, and no strong correlation was found. In addition, we analyzed the influence of splenectomy and the interval between the age at first symptom and the age of onset of treatment on the quantitative measurements of osteonecrosis. The results are consistent with previous studies, showing that prior splenectomy is closely associated with the fractional volume of osteonecrosis, and there is a positive relationship between the duration of untreated disease and the quantifications of osteonecrosis. We propose this technique as an efficient and reliable tool for assessing the extent of osteonecrosis in MR images of patients and improving prediction of clinically important adverse events.

Adverse effects of methylphenidate for apathy in patients with Alzheimer's disease (ADMET2 trial).

To examine clinically important adverse events (AEs) associated with methylphenidate (MPH) treatment of apathy in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) versus placebo, including weight loss, vital signs, falls, and insomnia. The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET2) trial was a multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MPH to treat apathy in individuals with apathy and AD. Participants in ADMET2 had vital signs and weight measured at monthly visits through 6months. AEs, including insomnia, falls, and cardiovascular events, were reported at every visit by participants and families using a symptom checklist. The study included 98 participants in the MPH group and 101 in the placebo group. Participants in the MPH group experienced greater weight loss on average than the placebo through the 6-month follow-up, with a difference in change between MPH and placebo of 2.8lb (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.7, 4.9lb). No treatment group differences in change during the trial were found in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. More participants in the MPH group reported falls during the follow-up, 10 versus 6 in MPH and placebo groups, respectively. No differences in post-baseline insomnia were observed between the treatment groups. No participants reported instances of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, stroke, or cardiomyopathy throughout the study period. MPH use in AD patients for treating apathy is relatively safe, particularly notable given the many medical comorbidities in this population. There was a statistically significant but modest weight loss associated with MPH use, and clinicians are thus advised to monitor weight during MPH treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of an aqueous formulation of rusfertide (PTG-300), a hepcidin mimetic, in healthy volunteers: A double-blind first-in-human study.

Rusfertide is a potent peptide mimetic of hepcidin being investigated for the treatment of polycythemia vera. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single and repeated subcutaneous doses of an aqueous formulation of rusfertide in healthy adult males. Subjects received single doses of 1, 3, 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg rusfertide or placebo. A separate cohort of subjects received two doses of 40 mg rusfertide or placebo 1 week apart. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were collected, and adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms, and vital signs were monitored. Rusfertide was well tolerated. There were no serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events, and no patterns of clinically important adverse events, or laboratory, vital sign, or electrocardiogram abnormalities. Mean maximum rusfertide plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve increased with dose, but less than dose proportionally. Median time to Cmax was 2-4.5 h for 40 and 80 mg rusfertide and 8-24 h for lower doses. Apparent clearance and half-life increased with dose. Single doses of rusfertide 1-80 mg were associated with dose-dependent decreases in serum iron and transferrin-iron saturation. Rusfertide was well tolerated and showed dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Cardiac rehabilitation makes a difference: lipid control targets and prognosis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has become a fundamental element in the recovery of patients with acute coronary syndrome, since it achieves greater therapeutic adherence and better control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF). Purpose We aim to describe the characteristics of patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) included in a cardiac rehabilitation program, as well as the achievement of prevention objectives and the occurrence of mayor adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods We present a prospective registry of 664 patients admitted to a Coronary Unit with a diagnosis of STEACS during the years 2017-2020. They were classified according to their participation in a CR program. We compared history, lipid-lowering treatment (prior, at discharge and titration), lipid levels at discharge and at 1-year follow-up, and degree of compliance with lipid targets. MACE were observed at 2-year follow-up. Results From 664 patients, 351 were excluded due to lack of follow-up or early mortality. From a total of 313 patients (mean age 59.9±11.2 and 81% male), 55.3% were included in the CR program, with this group presenting a lower mean age (55.46±8.7 vs 65.39±11.5 p&amp;lt;0.001), as well as a higher frequency of a history of early ischemic heart disease and smoking, and a lower frequency of arterial hypertension and diabetes (Table). Lipid-lowering treatment at discharge was similar in both groups. In patients undergoing CR there was a lower level of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) at one year (126.2±27 vs 137.2±34, p=0.002; 57.8±23 vs 67.5±26, p&amp;lt;0.001) compared to the group without CR. A greater reduction in LDLc (41.4% vs 0.86%, p&amp;lt;0.001) was achieved even from higher initial LDLc values. Titration of lipid-lowering treatment was also greater, with the old target of LDLc &amp;lt; 70 being achieved in a greater number of cases (81.5% vs 59.3%, p&amp;lt;0.001). At 1-year follow-up, the new cholesterol reduction target (LDL &amp;lt;55 or 50% reduction) was achieved in only 26.8% of patients, with a greater reduction being obtained in the CR group (34.1% vs 17.9%; p=0.02). At 2-year follow up, in CR group we found low rates of re-infarction (3.2% vs 4.1%), new revascularization (5.8% vs 7.3%), not statistically significant, but we could observe differences in mortality from all causes (0% vs 4.8%, p&amp;lt;0.01). Conclusions Participation in a CR program is associated with better lipid control in patients admitted for STEACS. These programs represent a basic tool for achieving increasingly demanding LDLc targets. Longer follow-up is needed to detect clinically important adverse events.

Post-marketing safety concerns with elagolix: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

ABSTRACT Objective Elagolix is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain associated with endometriosis. However, the long-term safety of elagolix in a large sample of real-world patients is unknown. Methods The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports were collected and analyzed from January 2019 to June 2023. Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed in data mining to quantify the signals of elagolix-related adverse events (AEs). Results After removing the non-drug-related AE signals, we detected several AE signals such as hot flushes, bone pain, suicidal ideation, depression, and increased liver enzymes, which were known during the clinical trial phase. In addition to this, we detected several unexpected important AEs that were not mentioned in the drug insert, including cystitis interstitial, parosmia, and epiploic appendagitis. The median onset time of elagolix-associated AEs was 28.5 days. Conclusion Our study provides a comprehensive picture of the safety of elagolix in the post-marketing setting, while also identifying potential new AE signals. These findings emphasize the importance of continued monitoring of the potential risks of elagolix.

Adverse Event Signal Detection Using Patients' Concerns in Pharmaceutical Care Records: Evaluation of Deep Learning Models.

Early detection of adverse events and their management are crucial to improving anticancer treatment outcomes, and listening to patients' subjective opinions (patients' voices) can make a major contribution to improving safety management. Recent progress in deep learning technologies has enabled various new approaches for the evaluation of safety-related events based on patient-generated text data, but few studies have focused on the improvement of real-time safety monitoring for individual patients. In addition, no study has yet been performed to validate deep learning models for screening patients' narratives for clinically important adverse event signals that require medical intervention. In our previous work, novel deep learning models have been developed to detect adverse event signals for hand-foot syndrome or adverse events limiting patients' daily lives from the authored narratives of patients with cancer, aiming ultimately to use them as safety monitoring support tools for individual patients. This study was designed to evaluate whether our deep learning models can screen clinically important adverse event signals that require intervention by health care professionals. The applicability of our deep learning models to data on patients' concerns at pharmacies was also assessed. Pharmaceutical care records at community pharmacies were used for the evaluation of our deep learning models. The records followed the SOAP format, consisting of subjective (S), objective (O), assessment (A), and plan (P) columns. Because of the unique combination of patients' concerns in the S column and the professional records of the pharmacists, this was considered a suitable data for the present purpose. Our deep learning models were applied to the S records of patients with cancer, and the extracted adverse event signals were assessed in relation to medical actions and prescribed drugs. From 30,784 S records of 2479 patients with at least 1 prescription of anticancer drugs, our deep learning models extracted true adverse event signals with more than 80% accuracy for both hand-foot syndrome (n=152, 91%) and adverse events limiting patients' daily lives (n=157, 80.1%). The deep learning models were also able to screen adverse event signals that require medical intervention by health care providers. The extracted adverse event signals could reflect the side effects of anticancer drugs used by the patients based on analysis of prescribed anticancer drugs. "Pain or numbness" (n=57, 36.3%), "fever" (n=46, 29.3%), and "nausea" (n=40, 25.5%) were common symptoms out of the true adverse event signals identified by the model for adverse events limiting patients' daily lives. Our deep learning models were able to screen clinically important adverse event signals that require intervention for symptoms. It was also confirmed that these deep learning models could be applied to patients' subjective information recorded in pharmaceutical care records accumulated during pharmacists' daily work.

Highly effective decontamination in a hospital environment: An easy-to-operate, low-cost prototype.

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are illnesses acquired during healthcare and are often the most important adverse event during healthcare. With the aim of increasing the effectiveness of disinfection/decontamination processes in the health service with safe and not promote microbial resistance, we propose the development of portable equipment associated with type C ultraviolet light (UVC). The efficiency of the irradiance emitted by the equipment (at dosages 3.5, 5.0, and 60 mJ/cm2) was determined by the action exerted after exposure against four different bacterial (Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus) and three different fungi (Candida albicans, C. parapsilosis, and Aspergillus section Fumigati). It was possible to observe that all treatments were capable of inactivating the bacterial species evaluated (p < 0.05), causing the irreversible death of these microorganisms. The most effective elimination of fungal agents was at a dose of 60 mJ/cm2 of UVC radiation, with a decrease in the fungal inoculum varying between 94% and 100% in relation to the control without exposure. Thus, our study showed that the application of the portable prototype with UVC light (254 nm) at a distance of 48 mm, allowed an average irradiance of 3.5 mW/cm2, with doses of 3.5 ≈ 60 mJ/cm2 (from 1 to 60 s of exposure), which can promote the total reduction of the bacteria evaluated and significantly reduce fungal growth. Therefore, this prototype could be used safely and effectively in the hospital environment, considerably reducing contamination and contributing to the reduction of healthcare-associated infection risk.

Silent Thyroiditis Associated with Ropeginterferon α-2b in a Patient with Polycythemia Vera.

Interferon is an emerging treatment option for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially for polycythemia vera (PV). Previous studies of interferon used therapeutically for hepatitis C have demonstrated that one of the most important adverse events associated with interferon treatment is thyroid dysfunction, and a management strategy for thyroid dysfunction has been established. However, whether or not the recommendation is also suitable for MPN settings is unclear. In this study, one PV patient developed silent thyroiditis during a phase 2 study of ropeginterferon α-2b. This case suggests that thyroid dysfunction is an important clinical issue to consider in interferon treatment for PV.

Clinically important changes and adverse events with centre-based or home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic respiratory disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: To determine the proportion of people who achieve minimal clinically important differences (MCID) with centre-based or home-based pulmonary rehabilitation and to synthesise data on adverse events.Methods: Cochrane reviews and electronic databases were searched to identify randomised trials comparing centre-based to home-based pulmonary rehabilitation, or either model to usual care, in people with chronic respiratory disease. Primary outcomes were the proportion of participants achieving MCIDs in exercise capacity and disease-specific quality of life. Secondary outcomes were symptoms and adverse events. Cochrane Risk of Bias 1.0 and GRADE were used to assess the risk of bias and certainty of evidence respectively.Results: Forty-nine trials were eligible. Compared to usual care, a higher proportion of pulmonary rehabilitation participants achieved the MCID for exercise capacity (6MWT: 47% vs 20%, p = 0.11), dyspnoea (43% vs 29%, p = 0.0001), fatigue (48% vs 27%, p = 0.0002) and emotional function (37% vs 25%, p = 0.02), with all of these between group differences statistically significant except for exercise capacity. There were no differences between centre-based and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in the proportion of participants who achieved MCIDs (34%- 58% across studies). Ninety percent of trials reported no adverse events. Certainty of evidence was low-to- moderate with all outcomes except for CRQ-mastery (centre-based vs home-based pulmonary rehabilitation, or pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care in COPD), ESWT (pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care in COPD) and 6MWT (pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care in bronchiectasis) where evidence was very uncertain.Discussion: Clinically meaningful outcomes are achieved by similar proportions of participants in centre-based and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation, with few adverse events. Reporting of trial outcomes according to MCIDs is necessary for informed decision making regarding pulmonary rehabilitation models.

Lesson from COVID-19 outbreak; importance of standard precautions to febrile neutropenia prevention in patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective observational study.

Intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy increases the risk of infection in patients with cancer by inducing bone marrow suppression and mucosal injury. Febrile neutropenia (FN) is the most important clinical adverse event in patients with cancer receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. To prevent FN, standard precautions including hand and respiratory hygiene are generally recommended, but the exact effect of non-pharmacologic intervention has not been clearly proven in the clinical setting. We aimed to compare the incidence of FN between the pre-coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) era vs. the post-COVID-19 era. We retrospectively enrolled patients with breast cancer who received an adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen containing adjuvant chemotherapy at Jeju National University Hospital. We compared the incidence of FN between the pre- and post-COVID-19 period and analyzed characteristics of the event and other clinical risk factors. In total, 149 patients were enrolled, including 94 who received AC chemotherapy in the pre-COVID-19 era and 55 who received it in the post-COVID-19 era. Sixteen patients (10.7%) experienced FN. Fourteen (14.9%) and 2 events (3.6%) occurred in pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 eras, respectively. The post-COVID-19 era was the only risk factor for FN (P = 0.032). We found an association between FN occurrence and the COVID-19 outbreak, providing indirect evidence of the importance of non-pharmacological measures to reduce FN risk in patients with breast cancer. Further research is required to confirm the standard precautions for FN prevention in patients with cancer.

Evaluation of efficacy, outcomes and safety of infant haemodialysis and ultrafiltration in clinical use: I-KID a stepped wedge cluster RCT

Abstract Background Critically unwell babies in intensive care units may develop acute renal failure. Options for renal replacement therapy are limited by their small size and available technology. Objectives To determine the clinical efficacy, outcomes and safety profile of the NIDUS® (a novel infant haemodialysis device) for babies under 8 kg, compared with current renal replacement therapy. Design A clinical investigation using a non-blinded cluster stepped wedge design with paediatric intensive care units randomised to sequences. Setting Paediatric intensive care units in six UK hospitals. Participants Children under 8 kg who required renal replacement therapy for fluid overload or biochemical disturbance. Interventions Continuous renal replacement therapy was provided by the usual methods: peritoneal dialysis and continuous haemofiltration (during control periods) and by the NIDUS (during intervention periods), a novel device designed for babies with a smaller circuit and filter and volumetric control of ultrafiltration. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was precision of ultrafiltration compared with prescription; secondary outcomes included biochemical clearances, accuracy of reported ultrafiltration and mortality. Data sources Bedside study data collected by weighing bags of fluid entering and leaving the device were entered into the study database along with case descriptors. Some secondary outcome data was collected via the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network. Results Ninety-seven participants were recruited by study closure, 62 to control and 35 to intervention. The primary outcome was obtained from 62 control but only 21 intervention patients, largely because of technical difficulties using NIDUS. The analysis comparing the available primary outcomes showed that ultrafiltration with NIDUS was closer to that prescribed than with control: standard deviations controls 18.75, intervention 2.95 (ml/hour), adjusted ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval (0.03 to 0.71); p = 0.018. The mean clearances for creatinine, urea and phosphate were lower on peritoneal dialysis than NIDUS, which were in turn lower than continuous veno-venous haemofiltration. The variability in the clearances was in the same order. Of the 62 control patients, 10 died (2/62 on peritoneal dialysis; 7/13 on continuous haemofiltration) before discharge from paediatric intensive care unit (16%), compared with 12 out of 35 (34%) in the NIDUS group: p = 0.04, 95% confidence interval for difference (0 to 36%). Harms No important adverse events occurred and the NIDUS has an acceptable safety profile compared with other renal replacement therapies in this critically ill population with multi-organ failure. Mortality was lowest for Peritoneal Dialysis, highest for continuous haemofiltration, with the NIDUS in-between. Only one serious adverse device event which was reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Conclusions NIDUS works effectively, delivering appropriate blood clearances and accurate, controllable fluid removal (ultrafiltration), indicating that it has an important place alongside other dialysis modalities for infant renal replacement therapy. Future work Findings from this study indicate some modifications are required to NIDUS to improve usability. Further studies on use of the NIDUS device in other populations of babies for example those with chronic renal failure, and long-term outcomes are required. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN 13787486. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme (NIHR award ref: 14/23/26) and is published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 11, No. 1. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.