Implementation Of Pathway Research Articles

The Impact of an Overactive Bladder Care Pathway on Longitudinal Patient Management.

Implementation of an overactive bladder (OAB) care pathway may affect treatment patterns and progression. This study aimed to assess the effect of OAB care pathway implementation on treatment patterns for women with OAB. This retrospective cohort study evaluated women with OAB, before (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2017) and after (January 1, 2019-December 31, 2021) care pathway initiation. Care pathway use included standardized counseling, early introduction of therapy, and close follow-up. Primary outcomes included OAB medication use, follow-up visits, third-line therapy, and time to third-line therapy. A total of 1,349 women were included: 1,194 before care pathway implementation and 155 after. Patients after implementation were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (P = 0.04) and less likely to smoke (P = 0.01). Those managed via a care pathway were more likely to use any medication or third-line therapy within 1 year after consultation (61.3% vs 25.0%; P < 0.001). This included higher proportions receiving a medication (50.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41.8%-57.6%] vs 23.3% [95% CI, 20.9%-25.7%]; P < 0.001) and progressing to third-line therapy (22.6% [95% CI, 15.7%-28.9%] vs 2.9% [95% CI, 2%-3.9%]; P < 0.001). Among those who underwent third-line treatment, care pathway use was associated with shorter time to third-line therapy (median, 10 days [interquartile range, 1-56 days] vs 29 days [interquartile range, 7-191 days]; P = 0.013). Those managed via a care pathway were less likely to have additional clinic visits for OAB within 1 year after initial consultation (12.3% vs 23.9%; P < 0.001). Use of an OAB care pathway was associated with higher rates of oral medication and third-line therapy yet decreased follow-up office visits. Use of an OAB care pathway may promote consistent and efficient care for women with OAB.

ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS CLINICAL PATHWAY WITH ICPAT (INTEGRATED CLINICAL PATHWAY APPRAISAL TOOL) AT FAISAL ISLAMIC HOSPITAL MAKASSAR YEAR 2022

Background: Clinical Pathways are crucial for implementing Good Clinical Governance in hospitals to reduce variations, ultimately decreasing the risk of medical errors. A Clinical Pathway must create a diagnosis with high volume, risk, cost, and problem-proneness standards. Appendicitis is an essential public health problem; the prevalence and incidence have increased globally. The clinical pathway implementation at our institution has yet to be evaluated. Objective: This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Acute Appendicitis Clinical Pathway using ICPAT. Methods: This study is a mixed methods study with a case study approach. Quantitative samples were collected from medical records of patients with acute appendicitis through proportional random sampling based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Qualitative participants were chosen according to appropriateness and adequacy principles. The validation method used was data triangulation. Result: The outcomes demonstrated a 0% compliance rate in implementing the clinical pathway for acute appendicitis. ICPAT results (content and quality); D1 (90%, 100%), D2 (39.13%, 25%), D3 (30.77%, 35.29%), D4 (60%, 100%), D5 (50%, 30.77%), D6 (66.67%, 75%). Conclusion: There was never a comprehensive review, especially using standard tools. This study helps Faisal Islamic Hospital conclude points to improve, especially the bad categories, namely the documentation, development, and maintenance dimensions.

Opioid reduction and enhanced recovery in orthopaedic surgery (OREOS): a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundKnee arthritis is a leading cause of limited function and long-term disability in older adults. Despite a technically successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA), around 20% of patients continue to have persisting pain with reduced function, and low quality of life. Many of them continue using opioids for pain control, which puts them at risk for potential long-term adverse effects such as dependence, overdose and risk of falls. Although persisting pain and opioid use after TKA have been recognised to be important issues, individual strategies to decrease their burden have limitations and multi-component interventions, despite their potential, have not been well studied. In this study, we propose a multi-component pathway including personalized pain management, facilitated by a pain management coordinator. The objectives of this pilot trial are to evaluate feasibility (recruitment, retention, and adherence), along with opioid-free pain control at 8 weeks after TKA.MethodsThis is a protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial using a 2-arm parallel group design. Adult participants undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty will be considered for inclusion and randomised to control and intervention groups. Participants in the intervention group will receive support from a pain management coordinator who will facilitate a multicomponent pain management pathway including (1) preoperative education on pain and opioid use, (2) preoperative risk identification and mitigation, (3) personalized post-discharge analgesic prescriptions and (4) continued support for pain control and recovery up to 8 weeks post-op. Participants in the control group will undergo usual care. The primary outcomes of this pilot trial are to assess the feasibility of participant recruitment, retention, and adherence to the interventions, and key secondary outcomes are persisting pain and opioid use.DiscussionThe results of this trial will determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial for the implementation of a multicomponent pain pathway to improve pain control and reduce harms using a coordinated approach, while keeping an emphasis on patient centred care and shared decision making.Trial registrationProspectively registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04968132).

A256 NAVIGATING IBD CARE : HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ INSIGHTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NURSE NAVIGATOR-LED IBD FLARE PATHWAY

Abstract Background Disparities in access to healthcare for persons living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) persist. An IBD nurse navigational role promises to improve access to evidence-based specialist care by minimizing inequities in access to care. Little is known about how to implement a provincial nurse navigational role in the Canadian health system. Aims This study aims to explore healthcare providers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an evidence-based IBD flare pathway through a provincial nurse navigational role. Methods This was a national qualitative study performed in collaboration with the CCC PACE Program, in which two virtual semi-structured group interviews were conducted in 2022. One group interview was with six IBD nurses from three provinces, and the second was with five gastroenterologists from five provinces. Participants were purposefully recruited. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) frameworks informed the interview script development. Data were transcribed verbatim and subjected to content analysis, with major themes categorized into the COM-B domains. The results of preliminary data analysis are presented. Results While IBD nurses emphasized the critical role of effective communication tools, standardized referral systems, strong administrative support and patient education and engagement as facilitators, they also highlighted challenges like patient resistance, variability of training and the necessity for tailored patient care. Other barriers identified were the medical complexity of managing overlapping conditions, remote vs in-person considerations and the perception and definition of a flare. On the other hand, IBD-focused gastroenterologists emphasized the potential of integrating pathways into electronic medical records and the value of empowering nurse navigators. However, they pointed out concerns regarding the inherent variability in disease presentation, entrenched medical beliefs, comfort levels with nurse-led pathways and the inherent diversity in medical practices. Both groups identified resource constraints as a barrier and an effective triage process as a facilitator. Conclusions This study sheds light on the multifaceted perceptions of healthcare providers concerning the implementation of an evidence-based IBD flare pathway through a provincial nurse navigational role. These insights underline the complexity of implementing a nurse navigational role and the need for targeted interventions and resources to address the identified barriers while leveraging the facilitators. Funding Agencies CCC

The Implementation of a Clinical Pathway to Improve Child Abuse Screening in Young Children With Fractures: A Quality Improvement Analysis

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening children under 2 years of age with a concerning fracture for physical abuse with a skeletal survey (SS). Nationally, 30% to 77% of children are not screened appropriately in emergency department settings. After implementation of an electronic clinical pathway for pediatric emergency department providers, guideline adherence improved from 61% to 81%. Among infants, SS performance increased from 79% to 81%. More non-White children received an SS, indicating potential implicit bias in screening practices. The results support clinical pathways to improve guideline adherence while promoting further examination of providers’ determination of screening needs.

Design organization and clinical processes around patient characteristics: Evidence from a multiple case study of Hemophilia.

Background: There is growing evidence of the relevance of designing organization of care around patient characteristics; this is especially true in the case of complex chronic diseases.Purpose: The goal of the paper - that focuses on the analysis of the clinical condition hemophilia in three different centers - is to address two different research questions:1. How can we define, within the same clinical condition, different patient profiles homogeneous in terms of intensity of service required (e.g. number of visits or diagnostics)? 2. What are the conditions to re-organize care around these patient profiles in a multidisciplinary and coordinated manner?Research design: The authors have used a multiple case study approach combining both qualitative and quantitative methodologies; in particularly the semi-structured interviews and the direct observation were aimed to map the process in order to come up with an estimate of the cost of the full cycle of care.Study sample: The research methodology has been applied consistently in three different centers. The selection of the structures has been based on two main different criteria: (i) high standards regarding both organizational and clinical aspects and (ii) willingness from management, nurses and physicians to provide data.Results: The study clearly shows that different patient profiles - within the same clinical condition - trigger a different set of diagnostic and therapeutic activities. It is, thus, important considering patient characteristics in the development and implementation of clinical pathways and this will imply relevant differences in terms of organizational and economic impact.Conclusions: These process-based analyses are very much critical especially if we want to move to a bundled and integrated payment system but, as shown by this study itself, require a lot of time and efforts since our healthcare information systems are still fragmented and vertically designed.

‘Look up from the waiting list and see the bigger picture’: a qualitative analysis of clinical specialist physiotherapist perspectives on low back pain care in Ireland

IntroductionHealthcare systems are struggling to deliver high-quality low back pain (LBP) care. In 2012 specialist physiotherapist-led musculoskeletal (MSK) triage services were introduced in Irish hospitals to expedite patient care and alleviate pressure on elective orthopaedic/ rheumatology consultant clinics. Specialist physiotherapists have expertise to inform health service improvement and reform, but their perspectives of LBP healthcare delivery have received scant attention. ObjectivesTo explore specialist physiotherapists’ perspectives on LBP care in Ireland, the barriers and facilitators to quality LBP care and the development of MSK interface services in primary care settings. DesignCross-sectional observational study using an anonymous electronic survey with thematic framework analysis of response data from open-ended questions. ParticipantsThirty-four clinical specialist physiotherapists in Irish MSK triage services. ResultsThematic analysis resulted in six overarching themes, grouped into two categories. One category pertained to LBP healthcare in Ireland with the following three themes: 1) Inadequate health services for patients with LBP; 2) Need for defined LBP clinical pathways; 3) Need for a multisectoral approach to spine health. Themes in the second category, pertaining to the development of community-based MSK interface services, were: 4) Concern regarding isolation from secondary care services; 5) Unrealistic expectations of MSK triage; 6) Improved communication and collaboration with primary care services. ConclusionSpecialist physiotherapists have concerns regarding LBP health services and persistence of a biomedical, secondary care-led approach. They advocate for investment in primary care multi-disciplinary teams, enhanced integration across primary and secondary care, development of a national clinical pathway and a multisectoral approach. Contribution of paper•This study captures, for the first time, the perspectives of specialist physiotherapists on LBP healthcare delivery enabling a better understanding of the ‘on-the-ground’ issues in delivering quality LBP healthcare.•Opportunities for LBP healthcare service improvement are identified at micro, meso and macro health system levels.•The findings can be used to inform the development and implementation of a new national LBP clinical pathway and community-based MSK triage clinics.

What is an enhanced recovery patient?

The use of enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) in surgery delivers standardized, repeatable, and measurable care that improves clinical outcomes for patients. These pathways address the surgical care episode, from preoperative surgical readiness, during the surgical admission, until after discharge. Standardized pathways have been well-studied in adults, and emerging data in children show promise. However, data reporting has been targeted toward specific study populations and may be a barrier to broader pathway implementation. In this review, we discuss implementation of pediatric ERPs, examine outcome studies and published inclusion and exclusion criteria, and describe strategies for broader implementation of pediatric ERPs.

The implementation of a pectus bar insertion enhanced recovery after surgery pathway: A quality improvement initiative.

Pectus excavatum repair is associated with significant discomfort, and pain is a primary contributor to postoperative hospital length of stay. Recent advances in postoperative pain control include the use of intercostal cryoablation techniques that may now make it possible to discharge patients on the day of surgery. Unnecessary variation in patient care and noncompliance with care bundles may be a factor in extended length of stay. The global aim of this quality improvement initiative was to successfully implement an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. The SMART aim was to have a greater than 70% compliance for the perioperative bundle elements within 1 year of the pathway implementation. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were designed to create and implement an ERAS pathway for patients undergoing a pectus bar insertion procedure. This multidisciplinary pathway was designed, managed, and implemented with key stakeholders from the Departments of Evidence Based Practice, Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Perioperative Nursing. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and compliance with elements of the pathway were measured for analysis for both the baseline and post-intervention groups with monthly automated reports. After implementation of the ERAS pathway, data on the first 50 patients showed a 90% compliance with the perioperative bundle elements. Mean length of stay was significantly decreased from 33 h (95% CI [28.76, 37.31]) to 18 h (95% CI [14.54, 21.70]). There were zero readmissions within 24 hours for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery. Employing a multidisciplinary approach in both planning and execution that standardized clinician practices and minimized unnecessary variation in patient care, an ERAS pathway for pectus bar insertion has been successfully established at our institution.

How Can We Design Policy Better? Frameworks and Approaches for Sustainability Transitions

The literature on socio-technical transitions offers a wide range of frameworks and approaches to conceptualise and steer sustainability transitions. However, the complex nature of transition processes, along with the weak correspondence between the transitions literature and policy design, make their joint application rather challenging. In response, this paper proposes a conceptual framework to inform actors managing a system or organisation in a transition process about the steps to follow, from the initial representation of the problem to the formulation of the interventions, and their eventual evaluation for further refinement. This framework is built from an integrative review of the sustainability transitions literature, incorporating state-of-the-art approaches and frameworks to guide policy design. It aims to advance the operationalisation and orientation of policies to accelerate sustainability transitions through a three-phased approach: (i) baseline assessment of systemic challenges, (ii) targets visioning and pathways design, and (iii) implementation and evaluation of policy interventions. The role of the most salient frameworks espoused in the literature is detailed and integrated into the conceptual framework so that transition actors are equipped with the necessary knowledge and tools to design effective policies for the realisation of their sustainability goals.

Dissecting the rationale for thromboprophylaxis in challenging surgical cases

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading preventable cause of death in surgical patients, and rates of fatal PE are increasing. Individual assessment, to balance the risks of thrombosis and bleeding, is the key to providing appropriate prophylaxis. The risk assessment process includes use of evidence-based guidelines, literature published since the latest guidelines, large registries, and risk scoring systems together with clinical experience and judgment. Risk assessment is a dynamic process and needs to be updated both during the hospital stay and just prior to discharge since clinical events may change the level of risk. The final assessment may identify patients who require ongoing anticoagulant prophylaxis after discharge. The Caprini risk score is widely used in surgical patients and is a composite of the number of risk factors and their relative weights. The Caprini risk score set point for risk levels requiring anticoagulant prophylaxis varies depending on the type of surgical procedure, surgical population, and number of risk factors. Mandatory implementation of evidence-based care pathways is helpful in lowering PE-related mortality. This review presents several challenging cases, emphasizing the importance of employing all available assessment tools, including dynamic assessment of risk during hospitalization. Finally, the limitations of evidence-based guidelines in complex scenarios and the need to employ all available tools to properly protect very high–risk patients are emphasized.

A Report on the Keynote Address and Symposium on Research in Health Disparities in the USA

Ensuring a diverse cancer research workforce remains challenging despite national recommendations and pathway programs dedicated to this mission. A panel composed of researchers, educators, and implementation scientists convened at the Binaytara Foundation’s 2023 Summit on Cancer Health Disparities to discuss funded pathway opportunities, share case examples, and outline best practices to achieve a diverse workforce and support research in cancer health equity. The panelists highlighted existing pathway opportunities through the National Cancer Institute’s Center to Reduce Health Disparities and illustrated specific funded examples, such as the University of Utah’s Huntsman Cancer Institute’s PathMaker program, the University of Utah’s postbaccalaureate program, and NIH diversity supplement mechanisms. Programmatic examples were illustrated with success stories from the panel. The panelists concluded with the following insights for successful pathway implementation: 1) Since a diverse research workforce benefits society, investing in training and funding mechanisms is critical to promote individual and societal success in making progress towards cancer health equity; 2) A holistic, inclusive, and pathway-focused approach can successfully support, retain, and promote students, trainees, and faculty underrepresented in medicine and science; and 3) An inclusive workforce is best prepared to meet the needs of the diverse communities we serve.

Factors Influencing Length of Care in Physical Therapy After Pediatric and Adolescent Concussion.

Social determinants of health including insurance type, income, race, and ethnicity have been shown to influence the utilization of physical therapy and recovery after an orthopedic injury. The influence of social determinants of health on the utilization of physical therapy and recovery from concussion is not well understood. Prospective observational registry study in a specialty concussion program. Patients diagnosed with a concussion using the Postconcussion Symptom Inventory and the visio-vestibular examination (VVE) who were also referred to physical therapy were included. The main outcomes of interest were the number of days from referral to initial physical therapy evaluation and the number of physical therapy visits completed. Information related to patients' age, race, ethnicity, sex, insurance type, and Child Opportunity Index was extracted from the registry. Multivariate and univariate regressions were used to assess the associations of each sociodemographic characteristic with the outcomes. A total of 341 patients diagnosed with concussion between January 2017 and December 2023 met inclusion criteria. The average age was 14.77, and 64% were female. Patients' age, race, ethnicity, insurance type, and Child Opportunity Index were not associated with days to evaluation or length of care in physical therapy. Higher PCSI scores in children under 12years (coefficient: 0.17, 95% CI,0.06-0.29) and female sex (coefficient: 1.2, 95% CI, 0.26-2.1) were associated with a longer course of care in physical therapy. Patients with an abnormal VVE score had on average 2.1 more physical therapy visits than those with a normal VVE score (coefficient: 2.1, 95% CI, 0.73-3.5). Higher PCSI scores in children, female sex, and higher VVE scores in general predicted a longer course of care in physical therapy. Implementation of a clinical care pathway for concussion care using the PCSI and the VVE may be one strategy to help mitigate systemic factors that might otherwise negatively influence access to physical therapy.

New CMS Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Value Pathway After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: Preparing for Mandatory Reporting

This article discusses the implementation of a new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Value Pathway (MVPs) applicable to elective total hip and total knee arthroplasty as created by Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) – the Improving Care for Lower Extremity Joint Repair MVP (MVP ID: G0058). We describe specific quality measures, surgeon-hospital collaborations, future developments with Quality Payment Program, and how lessons from early implementation will empower clinicians to participate in the refining of this MVP. The CMS has designed MVPs as a subset of measures relevant to a specialty or medical condition, in an effort to reduce the burden of reporting and improve assessment of care quality. Physicians and payors must be mindful of detrimental effects these measures in their current form may have on surgeons, institutions, and patients, including disincentivizing care for sicker or more vulnerable populations, and increased administrative costs. Early voluntary participation is crucial to gain valuable experience for the orthopedic community and in an effort to work alongside CMS to maximize care while minimizing cost for patients and burden for providers.

Implementation of an Anterior Mediastinal Mass Pathway to Improve Time to Biopsy and Multidisciplinary Communication.

Mediastinal masses in children with cancer present unique challenges, including the risk of respiratory and hemodynamic compromise due to the complex anatomy of the mediastinum. Multidisciplinary communication is often a challenge in the management of these patients. After a series of patients with mediastinal masses were admitted to Riley Hospital for Children Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, the time from presentation to biopsy and pathology was greater than expected. We aimed to reduce the time to biopsy by 25% and demonstrate improved multidisciplinary communication within 6 months of protocol implementation for patients presenting to Riley Hospital for Children Emergency Department with an anterior mediastinal mass. Quality improvement methodology created a pathway that included early multidisciplinary communication. The pathway includes communication between the emergency department and multiple surgical and medical teams via a HIPPA-compliant texting platform. Based on patient stability, imaging findings, and sedation risks, the approach and timing of the biopsy were determined. The pathway has been used 20 times to date. We successfully reduced the time to biopsy by 38%, from 25.1 hours to 15.4 hours. There was no statistically significant reduction in time to pathology. The multidisciplinary team reported improved communication from a baseline Likert score of 3.24 to 4. By initiating early multidisciplinary communication, we reduced the time to biopsy and pathology results, improving care for our patients presenting with anterior mediastinal masses.

Understanding barriers and facilitators to long-term participation needs in children and young people following acquired brain injuries: a qualitative multi-stakeholder study.

Background This study focused on exploring the longer-term participation needs of children and young people with acquired brain injury (CYP-ABI) and their families in one region of the UK and identifying the barriers and facilitators of their participation and well-being to inform the development of a behavioural change intervention for clinical implementation. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with CYP-ABI and parents. Focus groups were created with health, education, care and charity stakeholders. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) were used to map needs, barriers and facilitators. Results A total of 10 CYP/parent dyads (n = 20) and 17 health, education, care and charity stakeholders were included in this study. Unmet participation needs were mapped to the ICF and barriers/facilitators to the BCW. Significant unmet needs impacting CYP-ABI participation and family well-being were found. Barriers spanned 'Capability', 'Opportunity' and 'Motivation', the greatest being knowledge, skills, social influences, environmental context and resources, social identity and emotion. Facilitators included increasing awareness and understanding, supporting parents, long-term access to specialist assessment and rehabilitation, peer support and integrated collaborative pathways. Conclusion The long-term impact of ABI on CYP and families' participation and well-being were significant, with barriers spanning every sector and level of society. Implementation of collaborative, cross-sector (education, health and social care) accessible and family-centred care pathways is needed to meet the long-term needs of CYP-ABI and their families, ensuring equity of access. Multi-modal, family-centred, needs-led, theory-based interventions should be co-developed with CYP, families and stakeholders to improve the health and well-being outcomes and the lives of CYP-ABI and their families.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Spine Pathways and the Role of Perioperative Checklists.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) proposes a multimodal, evidence-based approach to perioperative care. ERAS pathways have been shown to help reduce complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, pain scores, and ultimately surgical costs, while improving patient satisfaction scores and outcomes in multiple surgical subspecialties [1-6]. Numerous specialties have implemented ERAS programs across the globe, providing a foundation for spine surgeons to begin the process themselves. Over the last few years, a significant number of papers have been addressing ERAS pathways for spinal surgery [7-19]. The majority have addressed the lumbar spine [9, 20-26]. The number of cervical ERAS pathways has been limited [27-29]. Many spine programs have begun the implementation of ERAS pathways, incorporating principles and interventions to various spine surgical procedures. Although differences in implementation across programs exist, there are a few common elements that promote a successful enhanced recovery approach [11, 16, 23, 25, 30-33]. All spinal ERAS pathways have three major elements, which are preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative phases. Within these phases some common elements include preoperative and intraoperative surgical checklists. Intraoperative checklist in addition to the "surgical time out" has been integrated into the workflow of most hospitals doing surgeries and have become a standard of care. The surgical checklist is designed to help reduce surgical errors and prevent wrong site/patient surgeries. Several surgical checklists have been developed throughout the years. Despite these safety protocols wrong site/level and other surgical errors continue to occur. Many cases of wrong level spine surgery (WLSS) still occur even when intraoperative imaging is performed [34, 35]. One survey reported that about 50% of spine surgeons have performed at least one WLSS during their career [36, 37]. Another survey reported that 36% of spine surgeons had performed at least one WLSS that was not recognized intraoperatively [38]. On a similar account, about 30% of spine surgery fellows have experienced wrong-site surgery [39]. From raw incidence rates, WLSS may seem rare, but these surveys show that the experience of WLSS is rather common among spine surgeons. WLSS is not yet a "never event." This may be due to poor quality of the intraoperative images, hindering subsequent level identification [34, 35, 38, 40]. Errors in interpretation of the imaging may also occur, including inconsistency in numbering vertebrae, inconsistency in landmark usage for level counting, and problems with numbering vertebrae due to lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) and other anatomical variants [34, 38, 41-43]. This chapter will describe a framework for the development and implementation of ERAS pathway for patients undergoing spine surgery. In addition, we will propose preoperative imaging guidelines and a comprehensive spine surgical checklist to incorporate into the perioperative phase to help reduce further surgical errors and WLSS.

Cross-Sector Collaboration to Improve Access to Community Services for People Living With Diabetes: Contributions From Actor-Network Theory.

Diabetes is a global public health issue. The Public Health Agency of Canada published a Diabetes Framework 2022 which recommends collaborative work across sectors to mitigate the impact of diabetes on health and quality of life. Since 2020, the INMED-COMMUNITY pathway has been implemented in Laval, Québec developing collaboration between healthcare and community sectors through a participatory action research approach. The aim of this article is to gain a better understanding of the INMED-COMMUNITY pathway implementation process, based on the mobilization of network actor theory. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted from January to March 2023 with 12 participants from 3 different sectors (community, health system, research), were carried out using actor-network theory. The results explored the conditions for effective intersectoral collaboration in a participatory action research approach to implement the INMED-COMMUNITY pathway. These were: (1) contextualization of the project, (2) a consultation approach involving various stakeholders, (3) creation of new partnerships, (4) presence of a project coordinator, and (5) mobilization of stakeholders around a common definition of diabetes. Mediation supported by a project coordinator contributed to the implementation of an intersectoral collaborative health intervention, largely due to early identification of controversies.

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery at a General hospital in Zambia

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), with its aim of reducing operative stress and accelerating rehabilitation, became a standard perioperative care in multiple surgical specialties in developed world. However, little is known about the implementation of the fast-track pathways in a low-resource environment. The objective of the study was to describe our experience and share lessons obtained in using ERAS protocol in general surgery patients.&#x0D; Methods: In this descriptive study, all consecutive patients with no age restrictions undergoing elective and urgent abdominal surgery were assessed for inclusion in ERAS program. A retrospective analysis encompasses 98 patients aged two weeks to 87 years with male to female ratio of 2.3:1. Outcomes were functional recovery, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.&#x0D; Results: All elements of ERAS protocol including minimal incision length laparotomy and accelerated postoperative care were used; however, certain components were modified depending on the availability of the resources and patient’s condition. Postoperative period complicated in 17.4% of cases, seven patients (7.4%) died after urgent operations, and no mortality was recorded after elective procedures. Median length of stay was 4.0 days. Local and systemic septic complications, paralytic ileus and performing of the stoma reversal procedure during the same hospital stay were reasons for delayed discharge.&#x0D; Conclusion: This study indicates that employment of ERAS program for general surgery population at a second level hospital is feasible and safe. Further larger-scale studies are needed.

Governance in times of turbulence: how has management by pathway facilitated the adaptation of the health and social services system in the context of Covid-19?

In Quebec, the notion of pathway integrates social and health dimensions, user-centered and is conceived as an intertwining of several episodes of care and services over long periods with an intersectoral perspective. A reform in Quebec's health system ‎‎2015‎‎ put the implementation of such pathways at the agenda.&#x0D; We conducted a developmental evaluation to study the implementation of integrated care pathways in 3 healthcare organizations and their network in Quebec (2017-2019). And we currently conduct another one to follow up with these 3 organizations (+ 2) in the turbulent context of COVID-19. In parallel, we gathered observational notes during meetings of various crisis cells set up to address the COVID-19 pandemic in its very early days in one of the territories of the study (April-May 2020). &#x0D; We seek to understand how change in governance occurred during the development of the integrated care pathways and its impact of leadership and decision taking inside and outside through healthcare organizations. Ultimately, we try to understand whether these governance practices have effectively facilitated the response to the pandemic crisis.&#x0D; The analysis used a conceptual framework based on the Complex Adaptive Systems ‎‎(CAS)‎‎ approach of multi-level governance and the model for robust governance strategies in a turbulent context developed by Ansell, Sorensen and Torfing (2020). Qualitative empirical data were collected through documentation (N=12) and observation (N=80h).&#x0D; Our results show that implementation of health and social pathways is based on a double innovation in terms of governance: based on a strategic community approach and introducing a matrix structure in the organization. Although pathway-based management has not been fully implemented in the healthcare organizations studied, our observations show that the change of vision has taken place and certain reflexes have been adopted. For example, the pandemic crisis cells were based on the perspectives put forward by the field (operational level), and the decision, action and feedback loops were very short. The COVID-19 pandemic showed that the health system is capable of great agility, particularly when it relies on a matrix dynamic for decision- making. Management by care and services pathways provides a systemic vision of the issues faced by the organization, in addition to being a cross-functional management tool between the various departments and between the operational, tactical and strategic levels of governance.