Implementation Of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Research Articles

Reconciling intimacy and safety: a qualitative systematic review of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation among gay and bisexual men

This review synthesises qualitative research on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake by sexual minority men to provide an overarching conceptualisation of the implementation processes involved. Twenty-four studies—comprising 734 participants from USA, UK, France, Canada, and Taiwan—were synthesised using thematic synthesis. The synthesis elucidates the dual significance of PrEP uptake: (1) risk management: reinforcing relational circumstances, and rebalancing safety and risk; and (2) sexual empowerment: reclaiming health and sexuality and refocusing on sexual fulfillment and intimacy. Overall, the findings show how gay and bisexual men use PrEP to reconcile their antagonistic desires for intimacy and safety by recalibrating protection and reimagining intimacy. This review conceptualises the essence of users’ experiences of PrEP implementation as reconciliation work—the labour and agency in making and remaking practices to manage discontinuities and incongruities—about the new HIV prevention modality. The concept of reconciliation work illustrates how using PrEP influences users’ practices, which in turn, shape the meanings of PrEP use within the community. This work engenders contingent transformations and outcomes beyond HIV protection, encompassing the broader aspects of health and sexuality. Findings support the adoption of more holistic and empowering approaches to sexual health promotion and intervention.

Fostering Access to PrEP Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 16 to 24 Years at High Risk of HIV Through the DREAMS Initiative in Four Districts in Zambia.

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa remain at high risk for HIV, yet limited data exist on implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for this group. We examined PrEP uptake among AGYW using a retrospective cohort enrolled in the Determined Resilient Empowered AIDS-free Mentored Safe (DREAMS) initiative in Zambia between October 2020 and March 2022. Consent was obtained from eligible AGYW at substantial risk for HIV, and they voluntarily participated in PrEP. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with PrEP refills following initiation. Of 4,162 HIV-negative AGYW, 3,233 (77%) were at substantial risk and initiated on PrEP. Overall, 68% of AGYW had at least one refill, but this differed significantly by age group and district. DREAMS was successful at reaching AGYW with PrEP services. More evidence is needed to assess reasons for discontinuation and to improve persistence for those with sustained HIV risk.

Improving HIV preexposure prophylaxis implementation within healthcare settings.

Improving HIV preexposure prophylaxis implementation within healthcare settings.

Initial implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for people who are incarcerated in Zambia: a cross-sectional observational study

There are over 23 000 incarcerated people in Zambia, a population which has higher HIV prevalence than the general population yet has no access to HIV prevention. To evaluate the feasibility of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation in Zambian criminal justice facilities, we offered PrEP services to incarcerated people and aimed to describe early implementation outcomes. In this cross-sectional observational study, we implemented a PrEP programme between Oct 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021, supporting 16 criminal justice facilities in four Zambian provinces. Before implementation, we held stakeholder engagement meetings with Zambia Correctional Service officials to discuss PrEP benefits, and trained Zambia Correctional Service health-care workers in PrEP management using the national PrEP training package. People who were incarcerated and screened positive for substantial HIV risk by use of a standardised HIV risk assessment tool were offered voluntary HIV testing and counselling. Those who tested positive were linked to antiretroviral therapy, and those who tested negative and met national HIV prevention eligibility criteria were offered PrEP. We assessed PrEP uptake and used descriptive statistics to characterise programme beneficiaries and the cascade of PrEP services. During the study period, we reached 12 367 people older than 15 years with HIV risk assessment and counselling, including 11 794 (95·4%) men and 573 (4·6%) women. Of these, 2610 people received HIV testing, with 357 (13·7%) testing HIV positive; positivity was significantly higher in women (20·6%) than men (13·2%, p=0·011). 1276 people were identified as HIV negative and PrEP eligible. Of these, 1190 (93·3%) initiated PrEP. The age group with the highest proportion reached and initiated on PrEP was those aged 25-29 years, representing 19·2% (2377 of 12 367) of all people reached and 24·1% (287 of 1190) of those who initiated PrEP. Delivery of PrEP to people who are incarcerated is feasible with adequate resourcing and support to the criminal justice health system, and can result in high uptake among eligible individuals. Further assessment is needed of PrEP persistence and adherence, and the perceptions of people who are incarcerated regarding their HIV risk and preferences for combination HIV prevention services. US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men accessing STI clinics: Optimizing HIV PrEP implementation.

BackgroundGay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) who attend STI clinics represent an easily accessible population for promoting HIV prevention interventions. We examined characteristics of gbMSM STI clinic attendees to identify those who could most benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).SettingGbMSM STI clinic attendees in British Columbia (BC), CanadaMethodsA clinical electronic charting system of STI clinics in BC was used to identify gbMSM from 2004 to 2017. Incident HIV cases were defined as testers who had at least one HIV-negative test and a subsequent HIV-positive test. Seroconversion rates were calculated by risk factor variables and by year. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of HIV seroconversion.ResultsThere were 9,038 gbMSM included, of whom 257 HIV seroconverted over the study period and 8,781 remained negative HIV testers, contributing 650.8 and 29,591.0 person-years to the analysis, respectively. The overall rate of seroconversion was 0.85 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 0.75–0.96). Incidence rates were higher among patients reporting >5 partners in the previous six months, inconsistent condom use, or having a partner living with HIV and who had a previous or concurrent diagnosis of rectal gonorrhea or rectal chlamydia. gbMSM presenting with two STIs such as rectal gonorrhea and syphilis (3.59/100 person-years [95%CI: 2.33–5.22]) or rectal chlamydia and syphilis (3.01/100 person-years [95%CI: 2.00–4.29]) had the highest incidence rates.ConclusiongbMSM with preceding or concurrent rectal STI diagnoses or syphilis had higher rates of HIV seroconversion. The data support the inclusion of specific STI diagnoses as an indication for PrEP.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation in Africa: some early lessons

Since antiretrovirals were first shown to prevent sexual transmission of HIV,1 numerous randomised trials have reported that oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is efficacious in preventing HIV infection in a range of settings and populations.2 However, there can be a substantial gap between efficacy in controlled clinical trial settings and effectiveness in real-world implementation, generally referred to as the efficacy-effectiveness gap. For example, three large HIV test-and-treatment implementation trials failed to demonstrate effectiveness in community settings, even though the initial individual treatment trial reported very high efficacy.

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake, Adherence, and Persistence: A Narrative Review of Interventions in the U.S.

Since 2012, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available to prevent HIV transmission; yet, uptake, adherence, and persistence to PrEP have been suboptimal. This narrative review examines the latest interventions and programs to improve all 3 stages of PrEP adherence and reviews ongoing studies to promote effective PrEP use. From 2017 to 2020, a total of 20 studies analyzed different individual- and structural-level approaches to increase PrEP adherence, including behavior change interventions, technology-based interventions (e.g., short message service messages and mobile applications), and alternate delivery strategies (e.g., pharmacy-based PrEP, integration with other services, and home delivery). Most published interventions involved men who have sex with men, although 3 assessed women (2 transgender, 1 cisgender). Randomized, controlled data support 3 behavioral change interventions and 1 technology-based intervention. Alternate delivery strategies seem promising, although more robust study designs are generally needed. In addition, data on the alignment of ongoing HIV risk and PrEP persistence (i.e., prevention-effective adherence) were limited. The authors also identified 20 ongoing studies that are promoting PrEP adherence. Future work should be inclusive of all at-risk groups in the U.S., including African American and Latinx heterosexual populations and people who inject drugs. Proven and promising approaches may work well in combination and may also need to be adapted with the introduction of long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis formulations. Collectively, this body of work indicates considerable progress toward understanding the role PrEP adherence will play in Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. that will be bolstered by the outcomes of ongoing trials.

Clinician imaginaries of HIV PrEP users in and beyond the gay community in Australia

Through the development and implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), the characteristics of PrEP users have been configured in a range of ways. Drawing on the concept of ‘imaginaries’, we consider how clinicians imagine PrEP users and related communities. We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews in 2019–2020 with PrEP-providing clinicians based in New South Wales and Western Australia. Participants included general practitioners, sexual health nurses and sexual health doctors. We inductively developed three themes through a reflexive thematic analysis: ‘PrEP users as 99% gay men/MSM’, ‘The informed and connected PrEP user’, and ‘Condom users in the PrEP era’. Participants imagined PrEP users primarily as gay men, and so we focused on how gay community was imagined in relation to PrEP users. Users were imagined as supporting one another to use PrEP effectively, but some were imagined as threatening norms of condom use amongst gay community. Analysing clinician imaginaries of PrEP users reveals insight into how clinicians speculate about and engage with changing community norms related to condom use and accessing PrEP. These imaginaries reveal ongoing tensions about who is believed to be best suited to PrEP, and PrEP’s impact on norms of conduct in imagined biosocial communities like gay men.

HIV PrEP implementation: A multi-level systems approach

PurposeCO-PrIDE was a three-year Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) demonstration project to increase access to PrEP for men who have sex with men and transgender people in the Denver/Aurora Metropolitan Statistical Area. CO-PrIDE implemented a multi-level framework featuring collaboration between health systems and community organizations to link clients to PrEP prescribers and provide support services intended to help clients overcome socioeconomic barriers to PrEP uptake. These services included payment assistance, insurance navigation, and healthcare navigation. CO-PrIDE implemented a participatory mixed-methods evaluation to understand the services associated with PrEP uptake. ResultsFrom January 2016 to December 2018, navigators screened 10,129 clients for PrEP and offered supportive services. The results indicated that clients who received payment assistance were more likely to accept a PrEP prescription (aPR = 3.52, p < .0001). Additionally, clients were more likely to receive a PrEP prescription through a co-located health system model, meaning the clinical provider is located with the PrEP Navigator (aPR = 3.78, p < .001). ConclusionsThe primary factors associated with increased PrEP uptake included co-location of navigation and clinical PrEP services and providing navigation to payment assistance programs. The evaluation results suggest that a multi-level framework that includes diverse support services is needed to implement a sustainable PrEP program.

Attitudes and Practices of a Sample of Nova Scotian Physicians for the Implementation of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis.

IntroductionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention tool that requires the ongoing support of physicians to be accessible. Recently, Nova Scotia experienced a 100% increase in HIV diagnoses. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between physicians’ support of PrEP, knowledge of PrEP, and PrEP prescribing history using the information-motivation-behavioral (IMB) skills model.MethodsAn online survey was distributed to physicians in Nova Scotia, Canada, and eighty physicians participated. Two exploratory factor analyses were conducted with items from the Support of PrEP scale and Knowledge of PrEP scale. A mediation analysis was conducted to assess if knowledge of PrEP mediated the relationship between support of PrEP and whether physicians have prescribed PrEP in the past.ResultsOn average, physicians reported strong support for PrEP, and as support for PrEP increased so did knowledge of PrEP. Further, physicians who had prescribed PrEP demonstrated strong knowledge of PrEP and physicians who had not prescribed PrEP reported feeling neutral. The 95% bootstrap confidence interval indirect effect of Support for PrEP on prescription history did not include zero (B = 1.59, 95% BsCI [0.83, 3.57]) demonstrating that the effect of support for PrEP is mediated by knowledge of PrEP. The most commonly identified barrier to prescribing PrEP was the lack of drug coverage among patients.ConclusionThe results of the mediation analysis support the IMB skills model regarding support for PrEP, Knowledge of PrEP, and having prescribed PrEP in the past. Our findings suggest that to improve PrEP uptake in Nova Scotia, educational interventions for physicians and universal coverage of the drug would be necessary.

Ambivalence and the biopolitics of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation

Ambivalence, the vacillation between conflicting feelings and thoughts, is a key characteristic of scientific knowledge production and emergent biomedical technology. Drawing from sociological theory on ambivalence, we have examined three areas of debate surrounding the early implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP, for gay, bisexual, queer, and other men who have sex with men in Canada, including epistemology and praxis, clinical and epidemiological implications, and sexual politics. These debates are not focused on the science or efficacy of PrEP to prevent HIV, but rather represent contradictory feelings and opinions about the biopolitics of PrEP and health inequities. Emphasizing how scientists and health practitioners may feel conflicted about the biopolitics of novel biomedical technologies opens up opportunities to consider how a scientific field is or is not adequately advancing issues of equity. Scientists ignoring their ambivalence over the state of their research field may be deemed necessary to achieve a specific implementation goal, but this emotion management work can lead to alienation. We argue that recognizing the emotional dimensions of doing HIV research is not a distraction from “real” science, but can instead be a reflexive site to develop pertinent lines of inquiry better suited at addressing health inequities.

102. Improving Implementation of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: Lessons Learned from Young Women in Rural South Africa

BackgroundYoung women in South Africa are at particularly high risk for acquiring HIV, yet implementation of HIV prevention programmes in rural settings lags. We examined the experiences and perceptions of young women initiating pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in a rural setting under real-world programmatic conditions, in order to strengthen future PrEP delivery to this population.MethodsYoung women initiating PrEP in Msinga, a municipality in KwaZulu-Natal province, were interviewed about their motivation to start PrEP and their experiences in taking PrEP. Interviews were conducted at PrEP initiation and longitudinally as they returned to clinic monthly for medication refills.ResultsAmong seventeen sexually active at-risk young women (IQR 18–22.5 years old) who initiated PrEP, 71% lived in a household receiving a government grant, 24% had history of an STI and 71% reported inconsistent condom use. All participants disclosed PrEP use to a family member, but only 20% informed their male sexual partner. All expressed uncertainty regarding their partners’ sexual activities as a primary motivation for PrEP initiation. Social support from family and friends as well as interacting with other young women taking PrEP were identified as important facilitators. Barriers to PrEP included lack of community awareness about PrEP, limited clinics offering PrEP, HIV stigma, and logistics of accessing healthcare facilities. Young women valued a peer PrEP champion to facilitate and maintain successful engagement in care, as well as patient-centered PrEP delivery models that allow for care outside traditional clinic facilities.ConclusionInput from young women has the potential to significantly enhance and expand PrEP implementation. Tailored implementation efforts should include strengthening the role of community health workers, improving community-wide PrEP education, empowering women within their relationships, facilitating skill building for PrEP disclosure to partners, incorporating community PrEP champions, and developing alternative PrEP delivery models including community-based delivery.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for women of color: Perspectives from healthcare providers and staff from three clinical settings

Women of color (WOC) account for 83% of new HIV infections among women in the United States. While pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe, effective HIV prevention method for women, WOC are less likely to be prescribed PrEP than other populations. Guided by an implementation science research framework, we investigated the implementation of a PrEP initiative for WOC in a US city with high HIV incidence. Across three clinical sites, only three WOC were prescribed PrEP after one year. Analysis of qualitative interviews with clinic staff and providers identified time constraints, reluctance to prescribe PrEP, and discomfort with counseling as implementation barriers. Implementation facilitators included staff and leadership support for PrEP, alignment of PrEP services with organizational missions, and having a centralized PrEP Coordinator. By addressing these identified implementation barriers and facilitators, clinic staff and providers can ensure that WOC are provided with the full range of HIV prevention options.

Implementation of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Homeless Primary Care Setting at the Veterans Affairs.

Objective: Oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV-1 acquisition, yet it is underutilized among at-risk populations. In this pilot quality improvement (QI) initiative, we sought to identify barriers to PrEP implementation and create interventions to improve access to PrEP in a primary care clinic for homeless veterans. Methods: The setting was a large homeless primary care clinic at the Veterans Affairs in an urban area with high HIV prevalence. A root cause analysis was performed to identify barriers to PrEP expansion in the primary care clinic. Targeted interventions to improve provider knowledge and patient access to PrEP were implemented by the QI team. Results: Root cause analysis revealed 3 primary barriers to PrEP expansion in the primary care clinic: institutional limitations for prescribing PrEP, inconsistent screening and recognition of eligible patients by clinic staff, and lack of clinic workflow processes to support PrEP prescription. A multidisciplinary focus group found low levels of PrEP awareness and knowledge, with only 22% of providers reporting comfort discussing PrEP with patients. This improved to 40% of providers following targeted clinic educational interventions. The QI team also developed a pathway for primary care providers to obtain institutional PrEP prescribing privileges and used work groups to develop clinic workflows and protocols for PrEP. At the end of the intervention, at least 50% of primary care providers in the clinic had initiated PrEP in a new patient. Conclusions: We describe a multidisciplinary QI model to implement PrEP within a primary care setting serving Veterans and persons experiencing homelessness. Our program successfully addressed provider knowledge deficits and improved primary care capacity to prescribe PrEP. The primary care clinic can be a viable and important clinical setting to improve access to PrEP for HIV prevention, especially for vulnerable populations.

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Implementation Cascade Among Health Care Professionals in the United States: Implications from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been approved for primary HIV prevention for individuals aged 18 years or older since 2012, PrEP utilization has been suboptimal. To understand trends in PrEP provision from the health care providers' perspective, we systematically assessed each specific stage along the PrEP implementation cascade (i.e., awareness, willingness, consultation, and prescription) among health care professionals (HCPs) in the United States. Between June and December 2018, we conducted a systematic review of published studies on this topic. A total of 36 eligible studies were identified and included in the analyses. Random-effect models were employed to examine the pooled prevalence of each key stage along the cascade. Time trend and subgroup analyses were conducted. A thematic analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators along the PrEP cascade. In this study, a total of 18,265 HCPs representing diverse demographics were included. The pooled prevalence of PrEP awareness was 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 55-80%], willingness to prescribe PrEP was 66% (95% CI = 54-77%), PrEP consultation was 37% (95% CI = 25-51%), and prescription provision was 24% (95% CI = 17-32%). Subgroup analyses revealed that PrEP provision among HCPs was lowest in the south, but has been improving annually nationwide. Infectious disease specialists [odds ratio (OR) = 4.06, 95% CI = 3.12-5.28; compared with primary care providers] and advanced practice registered nurses/physician assistants (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.09-2.09; compared with physicians) had higher odds of prescribing PrEP. Barriers and facilitators regarding optimal PrEP implementation were embedded within individual, dyadic, social, and structural levels. This meta-analysis has comprehensively examined the trend and pattern of PrEP implementation among HCPs. To achieve optimal implementation of the PrEP cascade in the United States, tailored training and programs need to be provided to HCPs.

Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): Results from a survey of primary care providers.

Primary care physicians (PCPs) are critical for promoting HIV prevention by prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Yet, there are limited data regarding PCP's preferred approaches for PrEP implementation. In 2015, we conducted an online survey of PCPs' PrEP prescribing and implementation. Participants were general internists recruited from a national professional organization. We examined provider and practice characteristics and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators associated with preferred models for PrEP implementation. Among 240 participants, the majority (85%) favored integrating PrEP into primary care, either by training all providers ("all trained") (42%) or having an onsite PrEP specialist ("on-site specialist") (43%). Only 15% preferred referring patients out of the practice to a specialist ("refer out"). Compared to those who preferred to "refer out," participants who preferred the "all trained" model were more likely to spend most of their time delivering direct patient care and to practice in the Northeast. Compared to participants who preferred the "refer out" or on-site specialist" models, PCPs preferring the all trained model were less likely to perceive lack of clinic PrEP guidelines/protocols as a barrier to PrEP. Most PCPs favored integrating PrEP into primary care by either training all providers or having an on-site specialist. Time devoted to clinical care and geography may influence preferences for PrEP implementation. Establishing clinic-specific PrEP protocols may promote on-site PrEP implementation. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of different PrEP implementation models on PrEP delivery.

Potential Impact of Interventions to Enhance Retention in Care During Real-World HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Implementation.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to significantly reduce HIV incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. However, the extent to which suboptimal PrEP adherence and retention in care may limit successful implementation is unknown. An agent-based model was used to represent the entire population of MSM in Rhode Island from 2013 to 2017. The impact of potential interventions to improve PrEP adherence and retention in care on HIV transmission was evaluated. Demographics, behaviors, and PrEP adherence and retention in care rates were based on local clinical data. We assumed that 20% of HIV-negative MSM had ever taken PrEP. The primary outcome was HIV incidence over the 5-year period. The model included 23,815 MSM with an estimated 4.1% HIV prevalence based on local surveillance data. An estimated 173.1 new infections occurred over 5 years [95% simulation interval (SI): 171.5-174.7], including 29.1 new infections among individuals who had ever initiated PrEP (95% SI: 28.6-29.7). Interventions that improved retention in PrEP care by an odds of 5.0 compared with the base case maximized reductions in HIV incidence among MSM who had ever initiated PrEP by 37.5%. Interventions focusing on improving PrEP adherence had little to no effect on HIV incidence, regardless of intervention efficacy. Retention in care is a critical component of the PrEP care continuum. Interventions that improve retention in PrEP care may lead to greater reductions in population-level HIV incidence compared with interventions focused exclusively on adherence.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Increased Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United States.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) decreases HIV transmission. Some studies have raised concerns about a potential association between the implementation of HIV PrEP and the growing incidence rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States. We conducted a quasi-experimental (interrupted time series) analysis of STI (syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia) rates before (2000-2012) and after (2013-2017) the implementation of HIV PrEP. We also performed correlations between HIV PrEP utilization and STI cases at the national (2012-2017) and state (2017) levels. We defined HIV PrEP utilization as the number of people taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine for HIV prevention. HIV PrEP implementation was associated with 25% (relative risk [RR] 1.254, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.245-1.263; P < .001) and 26% (RR 1.260, 95% CI 1.257-1.264; P < .001) increases in syphilis and gonorrhea rates, respectively, and a 12% reduction in chlamydia rates (RR: 0.884, 95% CI 0.883-0.885; P < .001). HIV PrEP utilization was correlated with the numbers of syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia cases (spearman coefficients 1.00, 0.94, and 0.94, respectively; P < .001, P < .01, and P < .01, respectively). At the state level, HIV PrEP was also correlated with the number of cases of syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia (spearman coefficients 0.85, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively; Ps < .001 for all correlations). The implementation and utilization of HIV PrEP in the United States were associated with increased rates of STIs. Further studies to confirm these associations and to elucidate potential causes are needed.

Advancing the case for nurse practitioner-based models to accelerate scale-up of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.

To explore the factors that position nurse practitioners (NPs) to lead the implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. The HIV epidemic represents a global health crisis. Reducing new HIV infections is a public health priority, especially for Black and Latino men who have sex with men (MSM). When taken as directed, co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir have over 95% efficacy in preventing HIV; however, substantial gaps remain between those who would benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and current PrEP prescribing practices. This is a position paper that draws on concurrent assessments of research literature and advanced practice nursing frameworks. The arguments in this paper are grounded in the current literature on HIV PrEP implementation and evidence of the added value of nurse-based models in promoting health outcomes. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing's advanced nursing practice competencies were also included as a source of data for identifying and cross-referencing NP assets that align with HIV PrEP care continuum outcomes. There are four main evidence-based arguments that can be used to advance policy-level and practice-level changes that harness the assets of nurse practitioners in accelerating the scale-up of HIV PrEP. Global public health goals for HIV prevention cannot be achieved without the broader adoption of PrEP as a prevention practice among healthcare providers. NPs are the best hope for closing this gap in access for the populations that are most vulnerable to HIV infection.

Improving HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation for Women: Summary of Key Findings From a Discussion Series with Women's HIV Prevention Experts.

Improving HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation for Women: Summary of Key Findings From a Discussion Series with Women's HIV Prevention Experts.