Implementation Of Guidelines Research Articles

Hospital falls clinical practice guidelines: a global analysis and systematic review.

Hospital falls continue to be a persistent global issue with serious harmful consequences for patients and health services. Many clinical practice guidelines now exist for hospital falls, and there is a need to appraise recommendations. A systematic review and critical appraisal of the global literature was conducted, compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Infobase of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Cochrane CENTRAL and PEDro databases were searched from 1 January 1993 to 1 February 2024. The quality of guidelines was assessed by two independent reviewers using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Global Rating Scale and Appraisal of Guidelines of Research and Evaluation Recommendation Excellence (AGREE-REX). Certainty of findings was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. 2404 records were screened, 77 assessed for eligibility, and 20 hospital falls guidelines were included. Ten had high AGREE-REX quality scores. Key analytic themes were as follows: (i) there was mixed support for falls risk screening at hospital admission, but scored screening tools were no longer recommended; (ii) comprehensive falls assessment was recommended for older or frail patients; (iii) single and multifactorial falls interventions were consistently recommended; (iv) a large gap existed in patient engagement in guideline development and implementation; (v) barriers to implementation included ambiguities in how staff and patient falls education should be conducted, how delirium and dementia are managed to prevent falls, and documentation of hospital falls. Evidence-based hospital falls guidelines are now available, yet systematic implementation across the hospital sector is more limited. There is a need to ensure an integrated and consistent approach to evidence-based falls prevention for a diverse range of hospital patients.

Navigating the path towards successful implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: key takeaways from the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy

BackgroundThe European Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (EU HTA R), effective since January 2022, aims to harmonize and improve the efficiency of common HTA across Member States (MS), with a phased implementation from January 2025. At “midterms” of the preparation phase for the implementation of the Regulation our aim was to identify and prioritize tangible action points to move forward.MethodsDuring the 2023 Spring Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), participants from different nationalities and stakeholder backgrounds discussed readiness and remaining challenges for the Regulation’s implementation and identified and prioritized action points. For this purpose, participants were assigned to four working groups: (i) Health Policy Challenges, (ii) Stakeholder Readiness, (iii) Approach to Uncertainty and (iv) Challenges regarding Methodology. Top four action points for each working group were identified and subsequently ranked by all participants during the final plenary session.ResultsOverall “readiness” for the Regulation was perceived as neutral. Prioritized action points included the following: Health Policy, i.e. assess adjustability of MS laws and health policy processes; Stakeholders, i.e. capacity building; Uncertainty, i.e. implement HTA guidelines as living documents; Methodology, i.e. clarify the Population, Intervention, Comparator(s), Outcomes (PICO) identification process.ConclusionsAt “midterms” of the preparation phase, the focus for the months to come is on executing the tangible action points identified at EAA’s Spring Convention. All action points centre around three overarching themes: harmonization and standardization, capacity building and collaboration, uncertainty management and robust data. These themes will ultimately determine the success of the EU HTA R in the long run.

Treatment of bipolar depression: clinical practice vs. adherence to guidelines-data from a Bavarian drug surveillance project.

Pharmacotherapy of bipolar depression (BPD) is confronted with major clinical challenges, like limited evidence-based treatment options, regular cases of treatment resistance, and risk of treatment-emergent affective switches. Medical guidelines can support practitioners to make decisions based on current scientific evidence. The objective of this study is to evaluate to what extent recommendations of the 2019 German S3 guidelines "Diagnosis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorders" are reflected in clinical practice in inpatient treatment. We conducted a descriptive analysis of prescription numbers in 2,627 patients with BPD in a naturalistic inpatient setting analyzing data from the ongoing Bavarian multicenter drug safety project Pharmaco-Epidemiology and Vigilance (Pharmako-EpiVig) from the years 2014-2022. Of the patients, 38% were not administered any drug explicitly recommended for treatment of BPD, that is, quetiapine, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or olanzapine. Only 6% of the patients received monotherapy with one of those drugs. Of the patients, 34% were administered ≥4 psychotropic drugs simultaneously. Patients received 912 different therapy regimens of mono or combination therapy with mood stabilizers (MS), atypical antipsychotics (AAP), and antidepressants. Of the patients, 72% received an antidepressant and 6% without concomitant prescription of an AAP or MS. Prescription rates of venlafaxine (21% to 14%) and tricyclic antidepressants (9% to 6%) decreased significantly from the first (2014-2016) to the last (2020-2022) observed time period. Of the patients, 60% received an MS. Prescription rate of valproate (22% to 14%) decreased significantly, while lithium prescription increased significantly (29% to 35%). Of the patients, 71% were administered an AAP. Quetiapine was the most prescribed drug overall (43%). Only two patients were administered a combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine. Our results demonstrate a substantial gap between guideline recommendations and current clinical practice. The remarkable heterogeneity in treatment regimens, with no discernible dominant treatment approach, is in part a reflection of the complexity of bipolar disorder but also substantiates the need of comprehensive recommendations regarding combination therapies. Increase in lithium prescription is an encouraging development due to its unique efficacy in maintenance treatment. To improve the quality of clinical practice guideline implementation, more randomized controlled trials shouldbeconducted in the future to prospectively investigate different implementation strategies.

Antibiotic Prescribing by General Dentists in the Outpatient Setting — United States, 2018–2022

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use impacts patient safety and antimicrobial resistance patterns. In 2013, general dentists in the U.S. prescribed nearly 10% of all outpatient oral antibiotics (24.5 million prescriptions). The American Dental Association (ADA) published guidelines in 2019 recommending limited antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of dental pain and swelling. We characterized dental prescribing during 2018–2022 to assess whether antibiotic use decreased after the guideline’s release. In addition, we examined access to dental care. Methods: All antibiotic prescriptions dispensed during 2018–2022 were extracted from the IQVIA Xponent database, which captured ≥92% of all U.S. outpatient prescriptions and projected to 100% coverage. Prescriptions by general dentists were compared to total outpatient oral antibiotic prescriptions and summarized by patient sex, patient age, and prescriber geographic region. Census denominators were used to calculate prescribing rates per 1,000 persons. IQVIA general dentist counts were used to calculate dentists per 100,000 persons. Results: General dentists prescribed 24.7 million antibiotic prescriptions in 2018 (75 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) compared with 25.2 million (76 prescriptions per 1,000 persons) in 2022. During 2020–2022, general dentists prescribed >10% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions (range 10.7%–12.1%). In each year, prescription rates were higher for females, patients > 65 years, and among prescribers in the Northeast. In 2022, there were 58 general dentists per 100,000 persons in the United States. The highest general dentist rate was in District of Columbia (100 per 100,000 persons) and the lowest rate was in Delaware (41 per 100,000 persons). Conclusions: Despite the ADA’s 2019 guidelines, prescribing by general dentists remained stable during 2018–2022. Because the total number of antibiotic prescriptions overall decreased, general dentists’ share of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions increased to >10% in recent years. Rate variation by patient characteristics and prescriber region may reflect differences in dental disease burden or may represent unnecessary antibiotic use. Dental antibiotic stewardship is needed, including dissemination and implementation of current prescribing guidelines. Further evaluation of prescribing indications and access to dental care is needed to inform dental stewardship priorities.

Epidemiology and Duration of Therapy in Patients with Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections: Retrospective Analysis

Background: Longer courses of antibiotics can be associated with antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials support treating gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI) for a shorter duration with a consensus that a seven-day course of antibiotics is appropriate for uncomplicated GN-BSI. Prior to the implementation of a GN-BSI treatment guideline at our institution, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with GN-BSI and the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT). Method: We retrospectively reviewed adult inpatients who had a blood culture with at least 1 gram-negative organism within 6 months (November 2022 to April 2023). Patients were excluded if they had a concomitant gram-positive bloodstream infection or if they were transitioned to comfort-focused care within 48 hours of their first positive blood culture. Complicated GN-BSI was defined as exhibiting any of the following: involvement of bone, joint, endovascular system, or foreign body, an inability to achieve source control, immunocompromised status, or failure to demonstrate clinical improvement or culture clearance within 72 hours. The primary outcome of this study was the mean DOT in patients with GN-BSI. Result: 100 patients met the inclusion criteria. Escherichia coli, identified in 54 cases, emerged as the most frequent organism. Urine (41) was the predominant source of bacteremia. Cefepime (48) was the most common empiric agent used. Of the 91 patients with available ceftriaxone susceptibility results, 84% had a susceptible organism. Amongst the 51 patients classified as having a complicated GN-BSI, the leading reason was immunosuppression. Table 1 presents a comparative analysis of complicated vs. uncomplicated GN-BSI. The average DOT for complicated GN-BSI was longer than the uncomplicated infections (20 vs. 11 days, P < 0 .005). Additionally, fewer patients transitioned to oral therapy in the complicated group (33% vs. 67%, P < 0 .005). Conclusion: At our institution, patients with uncomplicated GN-BSI have a shorter DOT and are more likely to transition to oral therapy than those with complicated GN-BSI. However, the mean DOT for uncomplicated infections remained longer than seven days and a large number of uncomplicated GN-BSI patients did not transition to oral therapy, indicating room for improvement in local practice through antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Clinical Practice Guideline on Acupuncture and Moxibustion: Adult Major Depressive Disorder (Mild-Moderate Degree): Determination of clinical questions: 《针灸临床实践指南: 成人轻中度抑郁症》: 临床问题的确定

Determining clinical questions is fundamental to the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), which bridges the initial phases and the final recommendations. It is essential for evidence retrieval and the formulation of recommendations. The scientific rigor and precision in determination of clinical questions directly influence the future implementation and applicability of guidelines. In 2020, the World Federation of Acupuncture-Moxibustion Societies initiated the project of clinical practice guideline on acupuncture and moxibustion for adult major depressive disorder (mild-moderate degree) to address clinical and medical decision-making issues in acupuncture treatment for adult mild to moderate major depressive disorder. This CPG provides systematic recommendations based on clinical evidence, patient values, and other factors, aiding decision-makers, clinicians, and patients in selecting appropriate interventions. This paper discusses and analyzes the determination process of clinical questions, and the related issues during the development of this guideline, aiming to provide a reference for determining clinical questions and developing CPGs in the field of acupuncture and exploring more scientific tools and methods for determining clinical questions in future CPGs.

Effect of Educational Guidelines on Diabetic Patients' Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-Efficacy Regarding Use of Artificial Pancreas

Context: Artificial pancreas has a beneficial effect on controlling blood glucose levels. Nurses play a crucial role in helping diabetic patients through educational guidelines that increase their knowledge and improve their attitude and self-efficacy regarding the use of artificial pancreas as a new technology to help continuously control blood glucose levels. Aim: to evaluate the effect of educational guidelines on diabetic patients' knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy regarding using artificial pancreas. Methods: A quasi-experimental study design (pre/post-test) was used to achieve the aim of this study. The study was conducted in the medical department and outpatient medical clinic at Benha University Hospital. A purposive sample of 100 adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were admitted to the mentioned setting during the study period. Three tools were used. Patients' Assessment Questionnaire comprises two parts: Patients' personal data and health history of the disease and patients' knowledge assessment. Patients' attitude Rating Scale regarding the use of the artificial pancreas, and Self-Efficacy Scale. Results: The result reported a significant difference in the satisfactory knowledge level of patients from 15% pre-educational guidelines to 57% post-educational guidelines. Significant differences in the total level of positive attitude increased from 22.0% pre-educational guidelines to 63.0% post-guidelines, and significant differences between the mean self-efficacy scores of the studied patients regarding their perception and confidence in the ability to use the artificial pancreas as it increased from 1.8±0.7 pre to 3.1±0.4 post the educational guidelines implementation. Conclusion: Educational guidelines have a positive effect on improving diabetic patients' knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy regarding the use of artificial pancreas. The study recommends implementing ongoing educational programs and workshops for diabetic patients on artificial pancreas.

Clinical Practice Guideline Development in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Departments Across the United States: A Cross-sectional Study.

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the process of clinical practice guideline (CPG) development in pediatric emergency medicine departments (PEDs) across the United States, with a focus on identifying areas for improvement to enhance the quality of CPGs. An electronic survey was distributed to PEDs with pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs. Respondents were asked about their CPG development processes (ie, guideline committee composition, consideration of conflicts of interest, grading recommendations, guideline training opportunities) based on the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool as well as implementation and monitoring. Univariate analysis was used to assess associations between the number of AGREE II elements adhered to and annual patient volume. Of the 84 PEDs surveyed, 44 (52.4%) responded, representing institutions from 28 states. Most PEDs (97.7%, n = 43) reported developing their own guidelines, citing the need to improve care quality and standardize patient care as primary reasons. Although most guideline committees included multidisciplinary team members (74.4%, n = 32), routine patient involvement in committees was rare (11.6%, n = 5), and barriers such as time and resource constraints hindered their inclusion. Formal training for committee members in guideline development was uncommon (18.6%, n = 8). There was an association between higher annual patient volume and the number of AGREE II elements adhered to (P = 0.03). Few PEDs considered potential conflicts of interest among committee members (13.6%, n = 6). Over half of surveyed PEDs (54.5%, n = 24) lacked a systematic approach to grading recommendations. Educational materials and workshops were the most common guideline implementation strategies. Our findings highlight need for improvement in the CPG development process in PEDs. Including patients in committees, providing formal training for committee members, and adopting a rigorous approach to grading recommendations are crucial steps toward enhancing guideline quality. Emphasizing these improvements has the potential to improve the quality of CPGs for pediatric emergency care.

A qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences with and acceptability of a technology-supported health coaching intervention (SHARE-S) delivered in coordination with cancer survivorship care.

Healthy cancer survivorship involves patients' active engagement with preventative health behaviors and follow-up care. While clinicians and patients have typically held dual responsibility for activating these behaviors, transitioning some clinician effort to technology and health coaches may enhance guideline implementation. This paper reports on the acceptability of the Shared Healthcare Actions & Reflections Electronic systems in survivorship (SHARE-S) program, an entirely virtual multicomponent intervention incorporating e-referrals, remotely-delivered health coaching, and automated text messages to enhance patient self-management and promote healthy survivorship. SHARE-S was evaluated in single group hybrid implementation-effectiveness pilot study. Patients were e-referred from the clinical team to health coaches for three health self-management coaching calls and received text messages to enhance coaching. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 patient participants, 2 referring clinicians, and 2 health coaches to determine intervention acceptability (attitudes, appropriateness, suitability, convenience, and perceived effectiveness) and to identify important elements of the program and potential mechanisms of action to guide future implementation. SHARE-S was described as impactful and convenient. The nondirective, patient-centered health coaching and mindfulness exercises were deemed most acceptable; text messages were less acceptable. Stakeholders suggested increased flexibility in format, frequency, timing, and length of participation, and additional tailored educational materials. Patients reported tangible health behavior changes, improved mood, and increased accountability and self-efficacy. SHARE-S is overall an acceptable and potentially effective intervention that may enhance survivors' self-management and well-being. Alterations to tailored content, timing, and dose should be tested to determine impact on acceptability and outcomes.

Pelatihan Penatausahaan Keuangan Pemerintah Desa Bagi Pemerintah Desa Curug Kecamatan Tirto Kabupaten Pekalongan

<p><em>Financial administration of village governments in Indonesia still experiences deficiencies in various aspects. Problems with village government financial administration occurred in Curug Village, Tirto District, Pekalongan Regency. Village Financial Management is strictly regulated in Law Number 6 of 2014. As Implementation Guidelines regarding Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, Government Regulation Number 43 of 2014 has been stipulated which regulates the Implementing Regulations of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. Government Regulation Number 43 of 2014 emphasizes village financial management.</em></p><p><em>Training activities were carried out by presenting material regarding Village Financial Administration followed by questions and answers between resource persons and participants. Through this training activity, it is hoped that the Curug Village Government apparatus, Tirto District, Pekalongan Regency will be able to administer their village finances well so that the Curug Village Government, Tirto District, Pekalongan Regency will be able to apply the principles of Good Governance.</em></p><p><em>Through the implementation of this community service activity, it is hoped that the Curug Village Government apparatus, Tirto District, Pekalongan Regency can increase their understanding of village government financial administration practices, especially the practice of recording village income and expenditure transactions in the General Cash Book and General Cash Assistant Book.</em></p><p><em>Keywords: Governance; finance; village.</em></p>

Design Guidelines for Implementation of Daylighting Strategies in Buildings of Pakistan

Design Guidelines for Implementation of Daylighting Strategies in Buildings of Pakistan

Evaluating Danish Breast Cancer Group locoregional radiotherapy guideline adherence in clinical treatment data 2008–2016: The DBCG RT Nation study

Background and purposeGuideline adherence in radiotherapy is crucial for maintaining treatment quality and consistency, particularly in non-trial patient settings where most treatments occur. The study aimed to assess the impact of guideline changes on treatment planning practices and compare manual registry data accuracy with treatment planning data. Materials and methodsThis study utilised the DBCG RT Nation cohort, a collection of breast cancer radiotherapy data in Denmark, to evaluate adherence to guidelines from 2008 to 2016. The cohort included 7448 high-risk breast cancer patients. National guideline changes included, fractionation, introduction of respiratory gating, irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes, use of the simultaneous integrated boost technique and inclusion of the Left Anterior Descending coronary artery in delineation practice. Methods for structure name mapping, laterality detection, detection of temporal changes in population mean lung volume, and dose evaluation were presented and applied. Manually registered treatment characteristic data was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Database for comparison. ResultsThe study found immediate and consistent adherence to guideline changes across Danish radiotherapy centres. Treatment practices before guideline implementation were documented and showed a variation among centres. Discrepancies between manual registry data and actual treatment planning data were as high as 10% for some measures. ConclusionNational guideline changes could be detected in the routine treatment data, with a high degree of compliance and short implementation time. Data extracted from treatment planning data files provides a more accurate and detailed characterisation of treatments and guideline adherence than medical register data.

Institutional Guideline May Not Be Enough to Change Practice in the Management of Traumatic Hemothorax (HTX) and Pneumothorax (PTX) Management

Traumatic hemothorax and pneumothorax (HTX/PTX) are traditionally treated with large-bore chest tubes, which can lead to pain and complications. Recent studies suggest pigtail catheters can be utilized as a non-inferior alternative. The Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine at NewYork Presbyterian – Weill Cornell Medical Center developed an institutional guideline to standardize tube size for treating traumatic HTX/PTX, aiming to reduce the use of large-bore thoracotomy tubes without causing adverse patient outcomes. This project at NYP-WCM included patients over 18 years of age admitted with thoracic injuries resulting in HTX or PTX treated with a chest tube from January 2022 to November 2023. Patients were identified through ICD codes in the trauma registry and electronic medical record. The primary outcome was adherence to the newly developed guideline for placing thoracostomy tubes. Conversion from pigtail to larger-bore chest tube and other adverse events were secondary outcomes. We identified 18 pre-guideline and 27 post-guideline HTX/PTX patients meeting the criteria. Before the guideline implementation, 15 out of 18 patients (83%) received care consistent with the guideline (no large-bore chest). After implementation, 25 out of 27 patients (93%) received care consistent with the guideline. Based on chart review, none of the patients in the pigtail cohort experienced complications or required conversion to a larger chest tube. Although the impact was modest, implementation of the institutional guideline correlates with a reduction in “unnecessary” large-bore chest tubes for treating traumatic HTX/PTX and showed a trend toward pigtail adoption. Placement of pigtails was not linked to negative complications or treatment failure, indicating a non-inferior safety and effectiveness profile for addressing traumatic HTX/PTX.

Anaesthesiologists’ guideline adherence in pre-operative evaluation: a retrospective observational study

BackgroundSurveys suggest a low level of implementation of clinical guidelines, although they are intended to improve the quality of treatment and patient safety. Which guideline recommendations are not followed and why has yet to be analysed. In this study, we investigate the proportion of European and national guidelines followed in the area of pre-operative anaesthetic evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery.MethodsWe conducted this monocentric retrospective observational study at a German university hospital with the help of software that logically links guidelines in such a way that individualised recommendations can be derived from a patient's data. We included routine logs of 2003 patients who visited our pre-anaesthesia outpatient clinic between June 2018 and June 2020 and compared the actual conducted pre-operative examinations with the recommendations issued by the software. We descriptively analysed the data for examinations not performed that would have been recommended by the guidelines and examinations that were performed even though they were not covered by a guideline recommendation. The guidelines examined in this study are the 2018 ESAIC guidelines for pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery, the 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery and the German recommendations on pre-operative evaluation on non-cardiothoracic surgery from the year 2017.ResultsPerformed ECG (78.1%) and cardiac stress imaging tests (86.1%) indicated the highest guideline adherence. Greater adherence rates were associated with a higher ASA score (ASA I: 23.7%, ASA II: 41.1%, ASA III: 51.8%, ASA IV: 65.8%, P < 0.001), lower BMI and age > 65 years. Adherence rates in high-risk surgery (60.5%) were greater than in intermediate (46.5%) or low-risk (44.6%) surgery (P < 0.001). 67.2% of technical and laboratory tests performed preoperatively were not covered by a guideline recommendation.ConclusionsGuideline adherence in pre-operative evaluation leaves room for improvement. Many performed pre-operative examinations, especially laboratory tests, are not recommended by the guidelines and may cause unnecessary costs. The reasons for guidelines not being followed may be the complexity of guidelines and organisational issues. A software-based decision support tool may be helpful.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04843202.

Bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities immediately following perinatal loss: a scoping review.

The objective of the scoping review was to explore the evidence and describe what is known about perinatal bereavement care guidelines provided within health care facilities prior to discharge. Additionally, the review sought to identify what is known about parents' mental health outcomes, and map these outcomes to the characteristics of the bereavement care guidelines. Perinatal loss poses a serious risk of emotional trauma and mental health sequelae. Conflicting evidence for international bereavement care guidelines and inconsistent implementation, a lack of experimental studies, and older syntheses with a limited focus or population made synthesis complex. Therefore, a scoping review was undertaken to determine the breadth and depth of the existing literature on this topic. Sources pertaining to bereavement care guidelines used in health care facilities immediately after perinatal loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, or neonatal death) and parents' mental health outcomes were included. Sources pertaining to family members other than parents, perinatal loss occurring outside of a health care facility, and physical care guidelines were excluded. The review was conducted using JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The team considered quantitative and qualitative studies, practice guidelines, case reports, expert opinions, systematic reviews, professional organization websites, and gray literature. CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, JBI Evidence-based Practice Database (Ovid), Embase, PubMed (NLM), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I (ProQuest), Web of Science Core Collection, and Epistemonikos were the major databases searched. OpenGrey, Google Scholar, and organizational websites were also searched. The earliest empirical study publication found (1976) served as the starting date limit. After pilot-testing the screening process, data were extracted, collated, and presented in narrative form as well as in tables and figures. The search was first conducted in September and October 2021, and an updated search was performed on February 9, 2023. The results provide a broad view of bereavement care guidelines to support grieving parents' mental health. The included sources (n = 195) were comprised of 28 syntheses, 96 primary studies, and 71 literature review/text and opinion. From the studies that specified the number of participants, 33,834 participants were included. Key characteristics of bereavement care guidelines were categorized as i) making meaning/memories, ii) good communication, iii) shared decision-making, iv) effective emotional and social support, and v) organizational response. Parents' reported mental health outcomes included both negative outcomes, such as depression, anxiety, anger, and helplessness, and positive outcomes, including coping, healing, recovery, and well-being. Conceptually the characteristics of published guidelines are fairly consistent across settings, with cultural variations in specific components of the guidelines. Despite the exponential increase in research pertaining to bereavement care after perinatal loss, there is a gap in research pertaining to certain characteristics of bereavement care guidelines accepted as best practice to support parents' mental health outcomes. This review provides support for future research given the trauma and mental health risks following perinatal loss. Policies ensuring consistent and appropriate implementation of bereavement care guidelines are essential to improve parents' mental health outcomes.

Exploring teacher understanding of curriculum and assessment policy statement document implementation in South African schools

Preparing subject teachers for understanding and implementation of curriculum and Assessment policy statement in schools has become a concern in nations as a way to strive for excellence. Yet, there is a little known about the understanding of curriculum policy than its effectiveness in the school. This study explored teacher understanding of Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) document implementation. The study employed a qualitative approach, utilizing a case study research design. The interpretivism paradigm was applied to gain an in-depth understanding secondary of teachers’ perspectives on the implementation of the CAPS. The population of the research study consisted of 100 teachers in Capricorn District, and the sample of this study consisted of ten (10) teachers who were selected using a convenient sampling technique. Data was collected using individual, semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews, and was analyzed using thematic data analysis method. The study concluded that internal and external workshops could serve the purpose of implementing the CAPS document in the classroom. In addition, movable resources, for better implementation of the CAPS document in the classroom. Lastly, for researchers, these findings may help with further research on strategies to be implemented in schools to encourage constant use of the CAPS document. The unique contribution of this article to existing research on the classroom implementation of CAPS guidelines is to address the gap identified by ineffectiveness of the subject policy to the secondary teaching.

Tuberculosis preventive treatment in eight SEAR countries – Current practices, implementation challenges and operations research priorities

ObjectivesCountries in the South East Asian region face similar challenges in control of infectious diseases. There is limited access to experiences and learnings of neighboring countries. The Indian Council - of Medical Research (ICMR) has established a Regional Enabler for the South-East Asia Research Collaboration for Health (RESEARCH) Platform for South East Asian Region (SEAR) countries to address the above issues. This paper discusses about current practices, implementation challenges and operations research priorities of Tuberculosis Preventive therapy (TPT) in eight SEAR countries. MethodsA three day workshop on “Capacity Building for TB Research under Programmatic Settings”. was conducted under the aegis of this RESEARCH platform jointly ICMR and the Union which was participated by eight SEAR countries. Data were collected from a semi-structured questionnaire prior to the workshop and open discussions during the workshop. ResultsThe various challenges faced for TPT implementation were broadly categorized as poor demand and low level of acceptance by the beneficiary, low level of acceptance to provide TPT among the providers, challenges in ruling out active TB, issues with supply and supply chain management of diagnostic tests and drugs. Many operations research priorities like person centric TPT driven models, capacity building for improving cascade of care for latent TB infection, health system strengthening and effective risk communication were identified. ConclusionFull implementation of the TPT guidelines requires focused attention and coordinated action from all stakeholders of the country to attain the full benefit of TB preventive therapy and the ultimate TB elimination goal.

Physiotherapist- and patient-reported barriers to guideline implementation of active physiotherapeutic management of low back pain: A theory-informed qualitative study

Background and objectiveAdoption of low back pain (LBP) guidelines in physiotherapeutic management is a well-documented problem. Thereby, an in-depth understanding of the barriers to implement an active approach for both patients and physiotherapists is needed. DesignSemi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists and patients with non-specific LBP. Interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), were analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. ResultsA total of 20 participants were interviewed, including ten physiotherapists and ten patients. Our findings reveal that patients and physiotherapists face each 23 barriers spanning 14 TDF domains. The TDF domain “social influences” revealed the most barriers, followed by “beliefs about consequences” and “environmental context” for patients and physiotherapists, respectively. Five barriers did overlap between both groups (lack of guideline awareness, incorrect exercise performance, interdisciplinary communication gaps, time constraints and challenges in patient compliance). ConclusionsBarriers to LBP guideline recommended physiotherapeutic practices span all 14 TDF domains. Consequently, future implementation interventions need to address multiple TDF domains for effective LBP guideline implementation.

Perioperative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Nordic countries

BackgroundUpper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, with typically only few new cases annually per urological department. Adherence to European association of urology (EAU) guidelines on UTUC in the Nordic countries is unknown. The objective of this survey was to examine the implementation of EAU guidelines, the perioperative management and organization of the treatment of UTUC in the Nordic countries.MethodsThe electronic survey was distributed to 93 hospitals in the Nordic countries performing radical nephroureterectomy (NU). The survey consisted of 57 main questions and data was collected between December 1st, 2021 and April 23rd, 2022.ResultsOverall response rate was 47/93 (67%) with a completion rate of 98%. Five out of the 6 examined subjects on diagnostic practice are applied by ≥ 72% of the participating centers. NU as treatment for high-risk UTUC is performed by 37/47 (79%), and 91% include a bladder cuff excision.ConclusionsAdherence to EAU guidelines is high on diagnostic practice in the Nordic countries, whereas disease management is less coherent.

Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals.

To train the machine and deeplearning models to automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals in accordance with iGuide categorisation, and to determine if prediction models can generalise across multiple clinical sites and outperform human experts. Adult brain computed tomography (CT) referrals from scans performed in three CT centres in Ireland in 2020 and 2021 were retrospectively collected. Two radiographers analysed the justification of 3000 randomly selected referrals using iGuide, with two consultant radiologists analysing the referrals with disagreement. Insufficient or duplicate referrals were discarded. The inter-rater agreement among radiographers and consultants was computed. A random split (4:1) was performed to apply machine learning (ML) and deeplearning (DL) techniques to unstructured clinical indications to automate retrospective justification auditing with multi-class classification. The accuracy and macro-averaged F1 score of the best-performing classifier of each type on the training set were computed on the test set. 42 referrals were ignored. 1909 (64.5%) referrals were justified, 811 (27.4%) were potentially justified, and 238 (8.1%) were unjustified. The agreement between radiographers (κ = 0.268) was lower than radiologists (κ = 0.460). The best-performing ML model was the bag-of-words-based gradient-boosting classifier achieving a 94.4% accuracy and a macro F1 of 0.94. DL models were inferior, with bi-directional long short-term memory achieving 92.3% accuracy, a macro F1 of 0.92, and outperforming multilayer perceptrons. Interpreting unstructured clinical indications is challenging necessitating clinical decision support. ML and DL can generalise across multiple clinical sites, outperform human experts, and be used as an artificial intelligence-based iGuide interpreter when retrospectively vetting radiology referrals. Healthcare vendors and clinical sites should consider developing and utilising artificial intelligence-enabled systems for justifying medical exposures. This would enable better implementation of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practices and reduce population dose burden, CT waiting lists, and wasteful use of resources. Significant variations exist among human experts in interpreting unstructured clinical indications/patient presentations. Machine and deep learning can automate the justification analysis of radiology referrals according to iGuide categorisation. Machine and deep learning can improve retrospective and prospective justification auditingfor better implementation of imaging referral guidelines.