Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation Research Articles

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for complex chronic total occlusions.

This analysis of a consecutive series of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) implanted for complex chronic total occlusions (CTOs) was done to evaluate the potential of this device to avoid a permanent full metal jacket with drug-eluting stents. We analyzed 52 young patients (50.8 ± 8.3 years) for the BVS group, and additionally we followed a subgroup of 17 patients where DES were combined with BVS mainly because severe calcification at the lesion site (hybrid group). BVS were successfully implanted in 69 of 70 patients. An average of 3.17 BVS were used per lesion in the BVS group, with a CTO length of 28 ± 20 mm, and a reference diameter of 2.92 ± 0.34 mm, 69% were J-CTO ≥ 2. The retrograde approach was used in 38%. The device length was 79 ± 25 mm with 3.65 ± 0.34 mm final balloon diameter. In the hybrid group BVS was used to cover the distal segment beyond the actual occlusion predominantly in LAD lesions. Patients were discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy prescribed for 12 months. At 12 months, no patient had died or experienced an acute myocardial infarction. Angiography or MSCT follow-up available in 67% showed no reocclusion within 12 months. The target revascularization was 7% at 12 months. Two patients experienced a late non-acute reocclusion at 17 and 19 months. The implantation of BVS for long complex CTOs was feasible with no stent thrombosis despite the high complexity of lesions and multiple BVS implanted. The lack of mechanical strength may lead to the need for focal reintervention, but still the long-term burden of full metal jacketed vessels could be avoided.

“Full-plastic jacket” with everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Clinical outcomes in the multicenter prospective RAI registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02298413)

ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to investigate mid-term clinical outcomes of patients treated with ‘full-plastic jacket’ (FPJ) everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) implantation. BackgroundFPJ with BRS may represent an interesting option for patient with diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD), but data on the clinical impact of FPJ using the Absorb BRS are scant. MethodsFPJ was defined as the implantation of >56 mm of overlapping BRS in at least one vessel. We compared outcomes of patients receiving Absorb FPJ vs. non-FPJ within the multicenter prospective RAI Registry. ResultsOut of 1505 consecutive patients enrolled in the RAI registry, 1384 were eligible for this analysis. Of these, 143 (10.3%) were treated with BRS FPJ. At a median follow-up of 649 days, no differences were observed between FPJ and non-FPJ groups in terms of the device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) (5.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.675) or the patient-related composite endpoint (PoCE) (20.9% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.149). Patients receiving FPJ had higher rates of target vessel repeat revascularization (TVR) (11.2% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.042). In the FPJ group, there was no cardiac death and only one (very late) stent thrombosis (ST) (0.7%). ConclusionsMid-term outcomes of a FPJ PCI strategy in the setting of diffuse CAD did not show a significant increase in composite device- and patient-related events, with rates of cardiac death and ST comparable to non-FPJ Absorb BRS implantation. However, these findings are hypothesis generating and requiring further validation.

Local Flow Patterns After Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Coronary Bifurcations - Novel Findings by Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Development of methods for accurate reconstruction of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) and assessing local hemodynamics is crucial for investigation of vascular healing after BRS implantation.Methods and Results:Patients with BRS that crossed over in a coronary bifurcation were included for analysis. Reconstructions of the coronary lumen and BRS were performed by fusion of optical coherence tomography and coronary angiography generating a tree model (TM) and a hybrid model with BRS (TM-BRS). A virtual BRS model with thinner struts was created and all 3 models were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics to derive: (1) time-average shear stress (TASS), (2) TASS gradient (TASSG), which represents SS heterogeneity, and (3) fractional flow reserve (FFR). Reconstruction of the BRS was successful in all 10 patients. TASS and TASSG were both higher by TM-BRS than by TM in main vessels (difference 0.27±4.30 Pa and 10.18±27.28 Pa/mm, P<0.001), with a remarkable difference at side branch ostia (difference 13.51±17.40 Pa and 81.65±105.19 Pa/mm, P<0.001). With thinner struts, TASS was lower on the strut surface but higher at the inter-strut zones, whereas TASSG was lower in both regions (P<0.001 for all). Computational FFR was lower by TM-BRS than by TM for both main vessels and side branches (P<0.001). Neglecting BRS reconstruction leads to significantly lower SS and SS heterogeneity, which is most pronounced at side branch ostia. Thinner struts can marginally reduce SS heterogeneity.

PP-52 - Poor Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Adherence May Not Be the Primary Predictor of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis

Introduction: The duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is one of the major concerns in interventional cardiology. The optimal DAPT duration after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation is not clear. The general consensus favours a longer DAPT duration after scaffolding. Several case reports have shown that discontinuation of DAPT after a year may lead to late scaffold thrombosis, suggesting the need to extend DAPT beyond a year. Moreover, clinical usage of Absorb BVS was restricted by the manufacturer company due to high rate of late thrombosis. Herein, we propose that poor DAPT adherence may not be the primary predictor of BVS thrombosis in the light of a new case report.

First serial optical coherence tomography assessment at baseline, 12 and 24 months in STEMI patients treated with the second-generation Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold

The aim of the study was to assess the vascular healing response after Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) utilising truly serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination at baseline, 12 and 24 months. This was a single-centre, prospective, longitudinal study with baseline, 12- and 24-month OCT evaluation of 18 STEMI patients treated with 22 Absorb BVS. The healing pattern was evaluated based upon lumen area, neointimal hyperplasia, strut coverage and apposition. The lumen area decreased at 12 months compared to baseline (8.52±1.69 mm² vs. 7.0±1.70 mm², p<0.01), but it did not change from that point onwards up to 24 months (7.0±1.70 mm² vs. 6.94±1.65 mm², p=0.92). At 12 months after the index procedure, the mean neointimal thickness was 217±69 μm and further neointimal hyperplasia was observed between 12 and 24 months though less pronounced (Δ62±44 μm, p<0.0001). Full circumferential coverage of the vessel wall by neointima was observed in 92% of frames at 24 months. The low number of malapposed struts at the index procedure (<5%) further decreased over the observation period and was found in only one patient at 12 and 24 months. The ratio of uncovered struts was low at both 12 and 24 months. This serial OCT analysis of the second-generation everolimus-eluting BVS in a STEMI population confirmed a favourable healing pattern as expressed by moderate neointimal growth, preserved lumen area and no late acquired malapposition.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) may represent an intriguing clinical scenario for implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS). Nevertheless, the knowledge about the performance of these devices in patients with ACS is limited. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of clinical studies aiming to assess the safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting-BRS versus everolimus-eluting-metallic stents (EES) in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Six studies enrolling 2,318 patients were included and analyzed for the risk of primary safety outcome (stent or scaffold thrombosis [ST/ScT]), primary efficacy outcome (target lesion revascularisation [TLR]), and secondary outcomes (myocardial infarction, cardiac death, all-cause death). Median follow-up was 9.5 (6 to 19.5) months. Patients treated with BRS had a significantly higher risk of definite ST/ScT compared with those receiving EES (2.3% vs 1.08%, odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 4.45, p = 0.03, I2 = 0%). Similarly, the risk of TLR was significantly higher in the BRS compared with EES group (3.5% vs 2.5%, OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.16, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). When TLRs due to thrombosis were excluded, the difference in risk estimates between the 2 groups was no longer significant (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.98, p = 0.71, I2 = 25%). Risk for secondary endpoints did not differ between the 2 groups. Results were confirmed when clinical and procedural variables were tested as potential effect modifiers in the meta-regression analysis for both primary endpoints. In conclusion, compared with those receiving EES, patients with ACS treated with BRS had increased risk of definite device thrombosis and TLR at mid-term follow-up.

Long-term safety of bioresorbable scaffolds: insights from a network meta-analysis including 91 trials.

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of biodegradable scaffolds and metallic stents. We analysed a total of 91 randomised controlled trials with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years in 105,842 patients which compared two or more coronary metallic stents or biodegradable scaffolds and reported the long-term clinical outcomes (≥2 years). Network meta-analysis showed that patients treated with the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) had a significantly higher risk of definite or probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT) compared to those treated with metallic DES. The risk of very late ScT was highest with the Absorb BVS among comparators. Pairwise conventional meta-analysis demonstrated that the elevated risk of ScT with Absorb BVS compared to cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents was consistent across the time points of ≤30 days (early), 31 days - 1 year (late) and >1 year (very late) ScT. In addition, target lesion failure rates were significantly higher in the Absorb BVS cohort, driven by both increased risk of target vessel myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation. Absorb BVS implantation was associated with increased risk of long-term and very late ScT compared to current-generation metallic DES. The risk of ScT occurred with a rising trend beyond one year.

Clinical findings after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in an unrestricted cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the RAI registry)

BackgroundThe bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) technology may be an appealing option in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the available evidence on its use in this challenging subset is limited. MethodsRegistro Absorb Italiano (RAI) is a multicenter, prospective registry that aims to assess BVS performance through a 5-year follow-up of all consecutive patients who undergone at least 1 successful BVS implantation. As a part of it, a subgroup analysis in STEMI patients was performed and the outcomes of this cohort compared to the remaining population (defined as “non-STEMI”) are reported here. ResultsAmong the 1505 patients enrolled, 317 (21.1%) had STEMI on admission. Among those, 232 (73.2%) underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 12 h from symptom onset; 64 (20.2%) were late-comers (>12 h); 16 (5%) underwent PCI after successful thrombolysis while 5 (1.6%) underwent rescue-PCI. At a median follow-up time of 12 months (IQR 6–20 months) no differences were noticed between STEMI and “non-STEMI” groups in terms of device-oriented composite endpoint (4.1% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.3) and its singular components: ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (3.2% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.7), target-vessel myocardial infarction (3.2% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.7) and cardiac death (0.6% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.9). The rate of definite/probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was numerically higher but not significant in the STEMI group (2.5% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.1). ConclusionsBVS implantation in an unrestricted cohort of STEMI patients is associated with a numerically higher rate of ScT compared to the non-STEMI group. Further studies exploring the potential clinical impact of a pre-specified BVS implantation strategy in this high-risk clinical setting are needed.

Coronary magnetic resonance imaging after routine implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds allows non-invasive evaluation of vascular patency.

BackgroundEvaluation of recurrent angina after percutaneous coronary interventions is challenging. Since bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) cause no artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to their polylactate-based backbone, evaluation of vascular patency by MRI might allow for non-invasive assessment and triage of patients with suspected BVS failure.MethodsPatients with polylactate-based ABSORB-BVS in proximal coronary segments were examined with 3 Tesla MRI directly (baseline) and one year after implantation. For assessment of coronary patency, a high-resolution 3D spoiled gradient echo pulse sequence with fat-saturation, T2-preparation (TE: 40 ms), respiratory and end-diastolic cardiac gating, and a spatial resolution of (1.08 mm)3 was positioned parallel to the course of the vessel for bright blood imaging. In addition, a 3D navigator-gated T2-weighted variable flip angle turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence with dual-inversion recovery black-blood preparation and elliptical k-space coverage was applied with a voxel size of (1.14 mm)3. For quantitative evaluation lumen diameters of the scaffolded areas were measured in reformatted bright and black blood MR angiography data.Results11 patients with implantation of 16 BVS in the proximal coronary segments were included, of which none suffered from major adverse cardiac events during the one year follow up. Vascular patency in all segments implanted with BVS could be reliably assessed by MRI at baseline and after one year, whereas segments with metal stents could not be evaluated due to artefacts. Luminal diameter within the BVS remained constant during the one year period. One patient with atypical angina after BVS implantation was noninvasively evaluated showing a patent vessel, also confirmed by coronary angiography.ConclusionsCoronary MRI allows contrast-agent free and non-invasive assessment of vascular patency after ABSORB-BVS implantation. This approach might be supportive in the triage and improvement of diagnostic workflows in patients with postinterventional angina and scaffold implantation.Trial registrationGerman Register of Clinical Studies DRKS00007456

Acute and one-year clinical outcomes following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: the ABSORB UK Registry.

The aim of this registry was to monitor practice patterns and outcomes in patients treated with Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) during the early phase of usage in the UK. A total of 1,005 patients with de novo coronary lesions were treated using careful implantation techniques at 24 centres. Follow-up at one year was obtained in 99%. An independent clinical events committee and angiographic core lab adjudicated all events. Patient age was 52 years and 46% presented with acute coronary syndromes. Lesion complexity was B2/C in 47.4%, with an average of 1.4±0.6 BVS implanted and a BVS length of 28±14.3 mm. A single BVS was implanted in 71.3%. High pressure post-dilatation was performed in 94.9%, with 50% using intravascular imaging. Device success was achieved in 98.7% and procedure success in 97.3% of patients. At one year, the device-oriented endpoint target lesion failure was 3.2%, and the patient-oriented endpoint major adverse cardiac events was 3.4%. Definite ST occurred in 1.4%. By multivariable analysis, scaffold size of 2.5 mm predicted ST at one year (OR 3.27, 95% CI: 1.28-8.37; p=0.014). With careful patient selection and technique, TLF rates following BVS implantation in real-world practice are comparable with contemporary drug-eluting stents. ST rates remain high, with small vessel size identified as a contributory factor.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: Experience From Two Australian Centres

Aims: The ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) is an everolimus-eluting scaffold that has limited long-term safety data. This dual-centre, prospective registry aimed to evaluate the long-term, out-of-hospital outcomes among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BVS.

Acute Thrombogenicity and Vascular Response after Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Evidenced from Porcine Coronary Model

Acute Thrombogenicity and Vascular Response after Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Evidenced from Porcine Coronary Model

Clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: results from GABI-R.

The aim of this study was to assess clinical restenosis and its predictors after implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in everyday practice in the large-scale German-Austrian ABSORB Registry (GABI-R). Between November 2013 and January 2016, 3,264 patients underwent BVS implantation in the 93 centres of GABI-R. At six-month follow-up, 24 patients experienced clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation (cTLR) unrelated to BVS thrombosis (cumulative incidence 0.76%; angiographically, 58.3% of in-BVS restenosis of focal pattern). Compared to patients without cTLR, patients with cTLR had more lesions per patient (1.83±1.0 vs. 1.36±0.7), complex (52.3% vs. 36.2%) and mild-to-moderately calcified lesions (65.9% vs. 60.5%) treated, and more frequently had overlapping BVS (22.2% vs. 10.8%), all p<0.05. Implanted BVS length was 40.0 mm (28.0, 46.9) vs. 23.0 mm (18.0, 30.0), p<0.001, remaining in the multivariable analysis the only independent predictor of cTLR (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, p<0.001). The myocardial infarction rate was also significantly higher among patients with cTLR, 29.2% vs. 1.7%, p<0.0001. cTLR related to BVS restenosis at six months after BVS implantation is a rare event depending on implanted BVS length. Whether cTLR increases the myocardial infarction risk needs to be evaluated at longer-term follow-up and within the setting of adequately powered randomised trials.

In-stent Flow Hemodynamics and the Risk of STent Failure Following Bioresorbable Vascular ScAFFolds Implantation – the STAFF Study

Abstract Background: Myocardial revascularization procedures have undergone important developments over the last decades, which led to a major shift in current clinical practice and therapeutic guidelines across the world. Bare metal and drug-eluting stents present several limitations, all centered on the concept of disturbed coronary hemodynamics after implantation, which can be surpassed by bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). BVSs are fourth-generation stents used in coronary revascularization procedures, but despite all the promising initial results published on their efficiency, several clinical trials have reported unsatisfactory results, and the main explanation was accredited to improper implantation method. Shear stress is a central element of intravascular homeostasis; it controls vascular remodeling, as well as the development, progression, and destabilization of atheromatous plaques. This study aims to assess the role of in-stent flow hemodynamics (evaluated by computational determination of shear stress via coronary CT imaging) in predicting the clinical evolution following BVS implantation. Material and methods: This case-control observational study will include patients with BVSs implanted at least 12 months prior to randomization. Each patient will undergo a complete evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, and imaging acquisitions via coronary CT angiography, based on which the endothelial shear stress will be calculated before and after BVS implantation. Post-processing of CT imaging data will evaluate the shear stress and the composition of the coronary plaques along the entire coronary tree. The primary endpoint will be the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with altered vs. non-altered BVS-related shear stress, and the secondary endpoints will comprise evaluating the rate of progression of stent resorption and progression of shear stress alteration. Conclusions: The findings of the STAFF study can be extremely useful in clinical practice for providing an answer to a key question that is still under debate: why do BVSs fail and how can we prevent this?.

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy (GABI-R).

The aim of this study was to analyse the procedural results and midterm safety of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) used for percutaneous coronary intervention in a large all-comers cohort from the German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy (GABI-R). A total of 3,231 patients were included in this prospective, observational, multicentre study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02066623) of consecutive patients undergoing BVS implantation between November 2013 and January 2016. Endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; a composite endpoint of death, target vessel revascularisation, and myocardial infarction), and target lesion failure (TLF; a composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation). Scaffold thrombosis was a further endpoint. Of all patients, 51.5% presented with acute coronary syndrome. Predilatation and post-dilatation were performed in 91.5% and 71.9% of patients, respectively. Procedural success was 98.9%. After six months, the incidence of MACE was 4.1% and of TLF 2.4%. The rate of target vessel MI was 1.5%, and target lesion revascularisation was performed in 1.8%. Definite/ probable scaffold thrombosis was documented in 1.4% of patients. GABI-R, the largest registry to provide data regarding safety after BVS implantation in a real-world setting, reveals high procedural success and low six-month event rates.

Lesion preparation with cutting balloon angioplasty is associated with coronary aneurysm formation in polylactide bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation.

Lesion preparation with cutting balloon angioplasty is associated with coronary aneurysm formation in polylactide bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation.

Restenosis patterns after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: Angiographic substudy of the GHOST-EU registry.

To evaluate pattern of in-BVS-restenosis after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. In-stent restenosis morphology impacts target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates and clinical outcomes. Although several trials report on outcomes after BVS implantation, information about in-BVS restenosis pattern is still lacking. Between November 2011 and January 2014, in 7 of 10 European centers participating in the GHOST-EU registry, 668 patients underwent BVS implantation. Of them 164 patients (200 lesions) underwent an additional angiogram 3 to 12 months after index PCI. Binary in-BVS restenosis (IBR) (in-segment diameter stenosis ≥50%) was observed in 12.7% (21 of 164) of patients (30 lesions), with a TLR rate of 16.5%. The IBR morphology was classified as focal margin in 50.0%, focal body in 26.7%, multifocal in 10.0%, and diffuse in 13.3% of these cases. Treatment of small vessels (OR 5.49, 95% CI 1.6-18.8, P < 0.01) was identified as independent predictor of IBR. Performing predilatation (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-1.04, P = 0.06), high-pressure postdilatation (OR 3.16, 95% CI 0.90-11.18, P = 0.07) as well as treatment of acute coronary syndrome (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03-1.12, P = 0.07) seem to strongly influence this risk. The IBR morphology is mostly focal involving particularly the BVS margins suggesting association with procedural aspects in this early experience with BVS. Treatment of small vessels is the strongest predictor of higher IBR risk.

The effect of bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation on distal coronary endothelial function in dyslipidemic swine with and without diabetes.

We studied the effect of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation on distal coronary endothelial function, in swine on a high fat diet without (HFD) or with diabetes (DM+HFD). Five DM+HFD and five HFD swine underwent BVS implantation on top of coronary plaques, and were studied six months later. Conduit artery segments >5mm proximal and distal to the scaffold and corresponding segments of non-scaffolded coronary arteries, and segments of small arteries within the flow-territory of scaffolded and non-scaffolded arteries were harvested for in vitro vasoreactivity studies. Conduit segments proximal and distal of the BVS edges showed reduced endothelium-dependent vasodilation as compared to control vessels (p≤0.01), with distal segments being most prominently affected(p≤0.01). Endothelial dysfunction was only observed in DM±HFD swine and was principally due to a loss of NO. Endothelium-independent vasodilation and vasoconstriction were unaffected. Surprisingly, segments from the microcirculation distal to the BVS showed enhanced endothelium-dependent vasodilation (p<0.01), whereas endothelium-independent vasodilation and vasoconstriction were unaltered. This enhanced vasorelaxation was only observed in DM+HFD swine, and did not appear to be either NO- or EDHF-mediated. Six months of BVS implantation in DM+HFD swine causes NO-mediated endothelial dysfunction in nearby coronary segments, which is accompanied by a, possibly compensatory, increase in endothelial function of the distal microcirculation. Endothelial dysfunction extending into coronary conduit segments beyond the implantation-site, is in agreement with recent reports expressing concern for late scaffold thrombosis and of early BVS failure in diabetic patients.

Early experience and favorable clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease in Korea.

Background/AimsCompared with metallic drug-eluting stents (DES), bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) may further improve long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease. We report our early experience with BVS in Korea.MethodsWe evaluated 105 consecutive patients with BVS implanted at Asan Medical Center, Korea between October 21, 2015 and June 3, 2016. Angiographic results, and in-hospital and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed.ResultsA total of 134 BVS were implanted to treat 115 lesions. The mean age was 62 ± 10.5 years; 85 patients (81%) were males, 26 patients (25%) were presented with acute coronary syndrome. Among 115 lesions treated with BVS, 76 (66.1%) were B2/C type, 27 (23.5%) were bifurcation lesions, and four (3.5%) were chronic total occlusion. Pre-dilation and post-dilation using high-pressure non-compliant balloon was performed in 104 lesions (90.4%) and 113 lesions (98.2%), respectively. During the procedure, intravascular imaging was used for all patients (100%; intravascular ultrasound 89 and optical coherence tomography 40 patients). Device success rate was 100%. In-segment and in-scaffold acute again were 1.1 ± 0.6 and 1.3 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Periprocedural myocardial infraction occurred in four patients (3.8%). No deaths, stent thrombosis, or urgent revascularizations occurred either during hospitalization or the follow-up period.ConclusionsIn this single-center experience, implantation of BVS with intravascular imaging support was feasible and early clinical outcomes were excellent. Evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of BVS and its feasibility in clinical use for a broader range of lesions is warranted.

Thirty-Day and One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: A Single-Center Experience.

Available data on the use of the Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) in real-world patients is limited, particularly in Asian populations. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of patients treated with a BVS in real-world practice in Taiwan. This study focused on 156 patients with coronary artery disease and a total of 249 lesions who received BVS implantation from October 2012 to October 2015. The study's primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE), such as a myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), definite or possible scaffold thrombosis, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality during the thirty-day follow-up period. The secondary endpoint was MACE during the one-year follow-up period. Additionally, the composite clinical secondary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), which was called device-oriented composite endpoint. The average age of the patients was 60.34 ± 10.15 years, and 81.4% were male. The average of Syntax score was 12.42 ± 8.77 points. 44.2 % lesions were type B2 or C. At 31 days, one patient experienced a MACE (1/156) the composite of two TLF (2/249) with ST elevation MI, which was related to scaffold thrombosis. At one-year, 5.1 % (8/156) of the patients experienced a MACE and 3.6% (9/249) of the lesions experienced a TLF. There was no cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in the 30-day follow-up. The one-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality rates were each 1.3%, respectively. Diabetes, ostial lesion, bifurcation lesion, and non-standard dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) were the strong associations of one-year TLF. Even with difficult and complex lesions of patients in this study, acceptable outcomes were achieved with low definite or possible scaffold thrombosis rates after BVS implantation. And despite anatomical issues, it is important to complete standard DAPT.