Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Placement Research Articles

DELAYED LEAD PERFORATION OF THE RIGHT ATRIUM IN THE PRESENCE OF PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA: A RARE COINCIDENCE

DELAYED LEAD PERFORATION OF THE RIGHT ATRIUM IN THE PRESENCE OF PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA: A RARE COINCIDENCE

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Pediatric Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BackgroundExercise stress testing (EST) in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients has not well described in a large heterogenous cohort. ObjectivesThe objective of the study was to determine the clinical utility of EST in pediatric HCM. MethodsThis was a retrospective single-center analysis of HCM patients younger than 21 years who had EST between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2019. Clinical, demographic characteristics, and EST data were analyzed, using the last EST during the study or prior to the event in subjects with a primary outcome. The primary composite endpoint included cardiac death, transplant, or arrhythmia requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. Outcome analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard modeling. ResultsThe study cohort included 140 patients, 52% with a recognized genetic variant. There were 2 tests aborted due to safety concerns (ST-segment changes, ventricular ectopy). The median age at first EST was 13.6 years. Ninety percent of patients were tested using cycle ergometry, and 44% were on a beta-blocker. The median peak oxygen consumption was 37.1 mL/kg/min (IQR: 12.5 mL/kg/min) or 81.2% predicted, the mean anaerobic threshold was 21.8 Ml (IQR: 8.3 mL), and the median peak power was 2.6 ± 1.1 W/kg or 73.7% predicted. Ectopy during EST was seen in 44% of patients, and 8% had an abnormal blood pressure response to exercise. The endpoint was reached in 12 patients. The presence of any degree of ectopy was a predictor of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio: 5.8; 95% CI: 1.3-26.7). ConclusionsEST is clinically useful in select pediatric patients with HCM. Ectopy on EST is a risk factor for cardiac death, cardiac transplant, and arrhythmias requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Prevalence of One-Year Mortality after Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Placement: An Opportunity for Palliative Care?

Background: Current guidelines recommend against placement of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with a life expectancy less than one year. These patients may benefit from early palliative care services; however, identifying this population is challenging. Objective: Determine whether a validated prognostic tool, based on patient factors and health care utilization from electronic medical records, accurately predicts one-year mortality at the time of implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement. Design: We used the United States (U.S.) Veterans Administration's "Care Assessment Needs" one-Year Mortality Score to identify patients at high risk of mortality (score ≥95) before their procedure. Data were extracted from the Corporate Data Warehouse. Logistic regression was used to assess the odds of mortality at different score levels. Setting/Subjects: Patients undergoing a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator procedure between October 1, 2015 and September 30, 2017 in the U.S. Veterans Administration. Results: Of 3194 patients with a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator placed, 657 (21.8%) had a score ≥95. The mortality rate among these patients was 151/657 (22.9%) compared with 281/3194 (8.8%) for all patients undergoing a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator procedure. Patients with a score ≥95 had 14.0 (95% confidence interval 8.0-24.4) higher odds of death within one year of the procedure compared with those with a score ≤60. Conclusions: The "Care Assessment Needs" Score is a valid predictor of one-year mortality following implantable cardioverter defibrillator procedures. Integrating its use into the management of Veterans Administration (VA) patients considering implantable cardioverter defibrillators may improve shared decision making and engagement with palliative care.

The Case for Home AED in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults NotMeeting Criteria for ICD.

Children, adolescents, and young adults with conditions such as cardiomyopathies and channelopathies are at higher risk of sudden cardiac death caused by lethal arrhythmias, especially ventricular fibrillation. Timely defibrillation saves lives. Patients thought to be at significantly high risk of sudden death typically undergo placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients thought to be at lower risk are typically followed medically but do not undergo implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. However, low risk does not equal no risk. Compared with the general population, many of these patients are at significantly higher risk for lethal arrhythmias. We make the case that such individuals and families will benefit from having an at-home automatic external defibrillator. Used in conjunction with conventional measures such as training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation, an at-home automatic external defibrillator could lead to significantly shortened time to defibrillation with better overall and neurological survival. We recommend that the cost of such home automatic external defibrillators should be covered by medical insurance.

Posttraumatic stress disorder in pediatric patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and their parents.

An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in the pediatric patient (and the precipitating events that led to ICD placement) can be traumatic for patients and their families and may lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of PTSD in pediatric patients with an ICD and their parents and identify the factors associated with PTSD incidence. Pediatric participants with an ICD aged 8-21 years and parents of children aged 0-21 years completed surveys that included demographic characteristics and PTSD measures. Pediatric participants completed additional psychosocial measures, such as anxiety and depression self-report questionnaires. Fifty youth (30% female) and 43 parents (70% female) completed the measures. Six of 50 youth (12%) met the screening criteria for a likely PTSD diagnosis, while 20 of 43 parents (47%) met the cutoff for PTSD on the screening measure. Children with PTSD were more likely to have had a secondary prevention ICD (83% vs 17%; P=.021), meet the clinical cutoff for depression (67% vs 16%; P= .005), and had higher shock anxiety scores (31.7 vs 17.9; P= .003) than children without PTSD. Female gender (57% vs 23%; P = .043) and patient depression (31% vs 5%; P = .042) were associated with PTSD in parents. Parents were found to be more likely to meet the criteria for PTSD than youth. In youth, PTSD was associated with medical and psychosocial factors, whereas PTSD in parents was associated with being female and child depression. Clinic-based screenings and management planning of emotional functioning are warranted to address psychological distress in patients and parents.

Acute Pericardial Effusion from Pacemaker Lead Perforation of Right Ventricle Identified on Bedside Emergency Department Ultrasonography

Introduction and Objective Cardiac pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICD) are devices used to treat a range of cardiac dysrhythmias. Symptomatic cardiac perforation may occur in as many as 4.2% of pacemaker or ICD placements with 1.2% of pacemaker or ICD placements leading to clinically significant pericardial effusion. Acute onset of symptoms within 24 hours of device placement due to cardiac perforation is particularly rare, with a paucity of reported cases. This report describes a case of bedside Emergency Department (ED) ultrasound identifying an acute onset of pericardial effusion following cardiac pacemaker placement in an 85-year-old woman who experienced pleuritic and oscillating chest pain. Case Presentation An 85-year-old woman with a past medical history of hypertension, diabetes and dual-chamber pacemaker placement two days ago presented to the ED with pleuritic and oscillating chest pain. Initial bedside Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) exam, performed by the emergency department attending, revealed a moderate pericardial effusion with evidence of a pacemaker lead perforation through the right ventricular myocardium. Lead perforation and effusion were confirmed via formal transthoracic echocardiogram. Minutes later, the patient was treated with a right ventricle lead repositioning procedure and recovered uneventfully. Conclusion Symptomatic cardiac perforation due to pacemaker or ICD placement is rare, with a range of potential complications which typically occur weeks to months after placement. This case demonstrates the utility of POCUS exam for patients presenting to the ED for non-specific chest pain as it facilitated the timely diagnosis of an atypical presentation of ICD-induced wall perforation.

Subcutaneous finger cardioverter-defibrillator in low weight paediatric patients: a case series.

Placement of traditional transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system in low-weight children is often difficult because of their vessel size, the elevated risk of lead malfunction and failure, children's growth and various anatomic constraints, creating the need for alternative solutions. Subcutaneous array leads combined with an abdominally placed ICD device can minimize the surgical approach. In this case series, we analyse the data behind indications for subcutaneous finger cardioverter defibrillator (SFCD) and discuss the preliminary clinical experience in low-weight children. We considered 4 consecutive children (mean age 3.9 years, range 3-5.5 years, mean body weight 17.6 Kg, range 14-23 Kg) who underwent SFCD implant from April 2016 to August 2020. All patients showed a good compliance to the device system with no complications (infections or skin erosions). No patients experienced in the observation period (mean time 44.5±21.5 months) sustained ventricular arrhythmias requiring shocks. No inappropriate shocks released by the device occurred. No significant changes were observed in LET (lowest energy tested) performed around 24 months of follow-up. All patients showed a good compliance and stable atrio-ventricular sensing and pacing thresholds. In smaller children in whom a transvenous approach is not feasible or not possible for anatomic reasons, the SFCD appears to be a safe method to prevent SCD with little surgical trauma and preservation of an intact vascular system, providing an adequate bridge to transvenous ICD or subcutaneous ICD implant late in the life.

The Association of Clustered Ventricular Arrhythmia and Cycle Length With ScarBurden in Cardiomyopathy.

Patients with≥2 ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events within 3months (clustered VA) have increased risk for mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the association of risk factors including scar characteristics on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with clustered VA and VA cycle length in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Data from 329 primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients (mean age 57 years, 26% women) were analyzed from the Left Ventricular Structural Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Death study. Twenty-one patients developed clustered VA (median time 2.7 years after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement). Men had the greatest risk for recurrent VA. Patients with NICM and scar had the highest incidence rate of clustered VA. In patients with NICM, each 1-g increase in core scar correlated with greater clustered VA risk (HR: 1.19; 95%CI: 1.07-1.32). Gray scar was similar among subgroups. Patients with NICM with clustered VA had the longest mean VA cycle length (297 ± 40 milliseconds). Higher core scar burden correlated with longer VA cycle length inpatients with NICM (P = 0.002), and higher body mass index correlated with shorter VA cycle length in those with ICM (P = 0.02). Type of VA was similar between cardiomyopathy subgroups, and no scar pattern predominated. Clustered VA was most common in patients with NICM and scar, with greatest risk among those with larger core scar. Core scar correlated with slower VA in patients with NICM, and higher body mass index correlated with faster VA in those with ICM. Type of VA was similar by cardiomyopathy etiology, and no dominant scar pattern was associated with clustered VA.

Update on Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.

Despite the advancements in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a leading cause of mortality and is accountable for approximately 15% of the total mortality in the USA. The prognosis after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) varies significantly and depends largely on the underlying etiology and the rapidity and efficiency of resuscitation; however, the outcome remains poor for most of the patients. The main culprits for SCD are coronary heart disease (CHD) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients with HFrEF and an ejection fraction (EF) of less than 35% are considered for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement if the EF does not improve. A wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) commonly known as a life-vest is sometimes used as a bridging modality until an ICD is implanted. The indication and utility of WCD is still a controversial topic. The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive review of literature for WCD utilization.

Combination of late gadolinium enhancement and genotype improves prediction of prognosis in non‐ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

AimsGenotype and left ventricular scar on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are increasingly recognized as risk markers for adverse outcomes in non‐ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the combined influence of genotype and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in assessing prognosis in a large cohort of patients with DCM.Methods and resultsOutcomes of 600 patients with DCM (53.3 ± 14.1 years, 66% male) who underwent clinical CMR and genetic testing were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoints were end‐stage heart failure (ESHF) and malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA). During a median follow‐up of 2.7 years (interquartile range 1.3–4.9), 24 (4.00%) and 48 (8.00%) patients had ESHF and MVA, respectively. In total, 242 (40.3%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (positive genotype) and 151 (25.2%) had LGE. In survival analysis, positive LGE was associated with MVA and ESHF (both, p < 0.001) while positive genotype was associated with ESHF (p = 0.034) but not with MVA (p = 0.102). Classification of patients according to genotype (G+/G−) and LGE presence (L+/L−) revealed progressively increasing events across L−/G−, L−/G+, L+/G− and L+/G+ groups and resulted in optimized MVA and ESHF prediction (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Hazard ratios for MVA and ESHF in patients with either L+ or G+ compared with those with L−/G− were 4.71 (95% confidence interval: 2.11–10.50, p < 0.001) and 7.92 (95% confidence interval: 1.86–33.78, p < 0.001), respectively.ConclusionClassification of patients with DCM according to genotype and LGE improves MVA and ESHF prediction. Scar assessment with CMR and genotyping should be considered to select patients for primary prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator placement.

Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients With Heart Transplant (from National Inpatient Sample Database)

Heart transplant (HT) recipients represent a unique and vulnerable population in whom medium and long-term outcomes are significantly affected by the risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in this population remains debated. A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample data between 2009 and 2018 was conducted. Hospitalization data on patients who underwent HT, or who had a preexisting HT, and who received a new ICD were included (excluding the preexisting ICD). Outcomes assessed included inpatient mortality, length of stay, and inflation-adjusted costs. We explored temporal trends in ICD placement and mean length of stay, and predictors of ICD placement. Between 2009 and 2018, 22,673 hospitalizations were recorded for HT, during which patients either received a concurrent new ICD placement (n=70 [0.31%]) or no new ICD placement (n=22,603 [99.7%]). During the same period, 146,555 admissions were recorded in patients with a history of HT. ICD placement in patients with a preexisting HT was associated with significantly higher inflation-adjusted costs ($55,680.7 vs $17,219.2; p<0.001). Predictors of ICD placement in preexisting patients with HT included cardiac arrest during hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]:14.3 [3.5 to 58.6]), drug abuse (OR:6.0 [1.3 to 27.1]), and previous PCI (OR:6.0 [2.1 to 17.3]). In conclusion, ICD placement in patients with HT history was associated with significantly higher inflation-adjusted costs. In patients with HT history, factors predicting ICD placement included cardiac arrest at hospitalization, previous PCI, and drug abuse.

PO-669-03 MACHINE LEARNING BASED ONE-YEAR MORTALITY PREDICTION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PRIMARY PREVENTION CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are strongly recommended for primary prevention in patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ejection fraction less than 35% if meaningful survival greater than one year is expected. However, currently many people die within one year of ICD implantation. Current prediction models for death following primary prevention ICD placement have only modest discrimination.

A new prediction model for ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

AimsArrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is characterized by ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). We aimed to develop a model for individualized prediction of incident VA/SCD in ARVC patients.Methods and resultsFive hundred and twenty-eight patients with a definite diagnosis and no history of sustained VAs/SCD at baseline, aged 38.2 ± 15.5 years, 44.7% male, were enrolled from five registries in North America and Europe. Over 4.83 (interquartile range 2.44–9.33) years of follow-up, 146 (27.7%) experienced sustained VA, defined as SCD, aborted SCD, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. A prediction model estimating annual VA risk was developed using Cox regression with internal validation. Eight potential predictors were pre-specified: age, sex, cardiac syncope in the prior 6 months, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, number of premature ventricular complexes in 24 h, number of leads with T-wave inversion, and right and left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs). All except LVEF were retained in the final model. The model accurately distinguished patients with and without events, with an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–0.81] and minimal over-optimism [calibration slope of 0.93 (95% CI 0.92–0.95)]. By decision curve analysis, the clinical benefit of the model was superior to a current consensus-based ICD placement algorithm with a 20.3% reduction of ICD placements with the same proportion of protected patients (P < 0.001).ConclusionUsing the largest cohort of patients with ARVC and no prior VA, a prediction model using readily available clinical parameters was devised to estimate VA risk and guide decisions regarding primary prevention ICDs (www.arvcrisk.com).

Heart failure quality of care and in-hospital outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry.

AimsTo assess heart failure (HF) in‐hospital quality of care and outcomes before and during the COVID‐19 pandemic.Methods and resultsPatients hospitalized for HF with ejection fraction (EF) <40% in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines©‐HF (GWTG‐HF) registry during the COVID‐19 pandemic (3/1/2020–4/1/2021) and pre‐pandemic (2/1/2019–2/29/2020) periods were included. Adherence to HF process of care measures, in‐hospital mortality, and length of stay (LOS) were compared in pre‐pandemic vs. pandemic periods and in patients with vs. without COVID‐19. Overall, 42 004 pre‐pandemic and 37 027 pandemic period patients (median age 68, 33% women, 58% White) were included without observed differences across clinical characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, or EF. Utilization of guideline‐directed medical therapy at discharge was comparable across both periods, with rates of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement or prescription lower during the pandemic (vs. pre‐pandemic period). In‐hospital mortality (3.0% vs. 2.5%, p <0.0001) and LOS (mean 5.7 vs. 5.4 days, p <0.0004) were higher during the pandemic vs. pre‐pandemic. The highest in‐hospital mortality during the pandemic was observed among patients hospitalized in the Northeast region (3.4%). Among patients concurrently diagnosed with COVID‐19 (n = 549; 1.5%), adherence to ICD placement or prescription, prescription of aldosterone antagonist or angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor at discharge were lower, and in‐hospital mortality (8.2% vs. 3.0%, p <0.0001) and LOS (mean 7.7 vs. 5.7 days, p <0.0001) were higher than those without COVID‐19.ConclusionAmong GWTG‐HF participating hospitals, patients hospitalized for HF with reduced EF during the pandemic received similar care quality but experienced higher in‐hospital mortality than the pre‐pandemic period.

Evolution of Devices to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death: Contemporary Clinical Impacts.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death and were first implanted more than 40 years ago. The addition of cardiac resynchronization improved outcomes in the heart failure population and is now an important part of optimized therapy for this population. In this review, we will address patient selection, risk stratification, and outcomes after ICD placement and technological improvements. Gender disparities in referral and outcomes will be discussed. Far from early technologies with limited pacing capabilities and no antitachycardia pacing (ATP), we have now moved to complex devices with the addition of ATP/ATP during charging, cardiac resynchronization therapy, remote monitoring, and improved battery longevity. The requirement for defibrillation testing at time of implantation has changed and in most implants are not required as part of new clinical guidelines. As the components most likely to fail are the leads, and many complications arise from the intravascular components, extravascular ICDs were developed, the subcutaneous ICD is now an option for many patients, and substernal devices are under clinical trials. Because shocks are associated with worse outcomes, optimized ICD programming is now recommended, with the benefit of reducing appropriate and inappropriate shocks with a decrease in mortality and no increase in the syncopal events. All these improvements will have a positive effect on patient outcomes and quality of life, and new technologies will be developed in the future.

Continuous Arrhythmia Monitoring in Pediatric and Adult Patients With Left Ventricular Noncompaction.

Patients with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) are at risk of clinically significant arrhythmias and sudden death. We evaluated whether implantable loop recorders could detect significant arrhythmias that might be missed in these patients during annual Holter monitoring. Selected pediatric and adult patients with LVNC who consented to implantable loop recorder placement were monitored for 3 years (study duration, 10 April 2014-9 December 2019). Fourteen subjects were included (age range, 6.5-36.4 yr; 8 males). Of 13 patients who remained after one device extrusion, one underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. Four patients (31%) had significant arrhythmias: atrial tachycardia (n=2), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (n=1), and atrial fibrillation (n=1). All 4 events were clinically asymptomatic and not associated with left ventricular ejection fraction. In addition, a high frequency of benign arrhythmic patterns was detected. Implantable loop recorders enable continuous, long-term detection of important subclinical arrhythmias in selected patients who have LVNC. These devices may prove to be most valuable in patients who have LVNC and moderate or greater ventricular dysfunction.

Wide Complex Tachycardia and Cardiac Arrest During Endoscopy

A 59-year-old man presented for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement after a wide QRS complex tachycardia cardiac arrest at an outside hospital. In this case report, we discuss the differential diagnosis of this patient’s tachyarrhythmia and the electrophysiological studies that established the diagnosis and guided management. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Infants and Toddlers: Indications, Placement, Programming, and Outcomes

Limited data exist regarding implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) usage in infants and toddlers. This study evaluates ICD placement indications, procedural techniques, programming strategies, and outcomes of ICDs in infants and toddlers. This is a single-center retrospective review of all patients ≤3 years old who received an ICD from 2009 to 2021. Fifteen patients received an ICD at an age of 1.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.1-2.4; 12 [80%] women; weight, 8.2 kg [IQR, 4.2-12.6]) and were followed for a median of 4.28 years (IQR, 1.40-5.53) or 64.2 patient-years. ICDs were placed for secondary prevention in 12 patients (80%). Diagnoses included 8 long-QT syndromes (53%), 4 idiopathic ventricular tachycardias/ventricular fibrillations (VFs; 27%), 1 recurrent ventricular tachycardia with cardiomyopathy (7%), 1 VF with left ventricular noncompaction (7%), and 1 catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (7%). All implants were epicardial, with a coil in the pericardial space. Intraoperative defibrillation safety testing was attempted in 11 patients (73%), with VF induced in 8 (53%). Successful restoration of sinus rhythm was achieved in all tested patients with a median of 9 (IQR, 7.3-11.3) J or 0.90 (IQR, 0.68-1.04) J/kg. Complications consisted of 1 postoperative chylothorax and 3 episodes of feeding intolerance. VF detection was programmed to 250 (IQR, 240-250) ms with first shock delivering 10 (IQR, 5-15) J or 1.1 (IQR, 0.8-1.4) J/kg. Three patients (20%) received appropriate shocks for ventricular tachycardia/VF. No patient received an inappropriate shock. There were 2 (13%) ventricular lead fractures (at 2.6 and 4.2 years post-implant), 1 (7%) pocket-site infection, and 2 (13%) generator exchanges. All patients were alive, and 1 patient (7%) received a heart transplant. ICDs can be safely and effectively placed for sudden death prevention in infants and toddlers with good midterm outcomes.

Submammary placement of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a Singapore plastic surgeon experience.

The use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in young women has been increasing in recent years owing to greater awareness about inherited cardiac conditions that increase the risk of sudden death. Traditional placement of ICDs in the infraclavicular region among young women often leads to visible scars, a constant prominence that causes irritation from purse or bra straps and can result in body image concerns and device-related emotional distress. In this case series, two women with long QT syndrome required placement of ICDs for prevention of sudden cardiac death. Submammary placement of ICDs was performed in collaboration with electrophysiologists. We describe our local experience and technique in submammary placement of ICDs as well as the challenges faced.

Decision-Making Experiences and Decisional Regret in Patients Receiving Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Background: Patient education before the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is strongly recommended to prevent or mitigate feelings of regret and frustration in ICD recipients. Medicare guidelines for ICDs require a shared decision-making approach that focuses on patients' health goals, values, and preferences before implantation. However, many patients are not fully informed of what to expect when recovering from ICD placement or living with an ICD long-term. Objectives: Our objective is to understand decision-making processes and decisional regret in patients requiring ICDs using in-depth interviews. Methods: Nineteen patients at Stanford University Medical Center were recruited to participate in individual interviews using closed-ended and open-ended questions to engage dialogue. Notes taken during interviews were assessed and used to identify major themes. Results: Participants described a lack of adequate education about ICD postoperative recovery and long-term, postimplantation considerations such as avoiding electromagnetic fields, false-positive ICD shocks, and the esthetic effect of ICD implantation. In addition, feelings of fear and anxiety were prevalent in participants' recollections of accepting an ICD. Conclusion: Further improvement in patient education before ICD placement is needed. The decision-making process can be simplified and patient regret and frustration minimized by providing reliable information that is accessible and interactive.