Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Implantation Research Articles

Long-term prognostic role of pre-ICD implantation magnetic resonance: a longitudinal cohort study

Abstract Background While it's has already been demonstrated that cardiovascular mortality increases in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF), there is no evidence that this parameter identifies with high sensitivity those who will experience sudden cardiac death (SCD). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), through myocardial scar characterization, could enhance risk stratification for arrhythmic events in such patients. Purpose The study's objective was to identify factors, independent of EF, capable of stratifying arrhythmic risk in a population of patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Methods This is an observational, retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected for all patients undergoing ICD implantation between 2014 and 2021. Deaths from all causes and significant arrhythmic events (non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation) were recorded during routine device controls and remote monitoring. To define the prognostic value of various factors was performed an univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis in relation to the composite primary endpoint, consisting of ventricular arrhythmias [VA] and all-cause mortality. Results Among 700 patients (82% males, mean age 69 ± 13 years) who underwent ICD implantation (46% single-chamber, 15% dual-chamber, 36% cardiac resynchronization therapy, 3% subcutaneous ICD) pre-implantation CMR was available in 354 of the total, with 69% of them implanted for primary prevention and 52% with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was present in 67% of them; and 30% of these patients had it in fewer than 5 segments. At the end of the mean 8-year follow-up, 30.6% of patients died. Patients with LGE showed increased all-cause mortality and incidence of VA compared to those without LGE (HR=2.17 [1.78-2.60]; p<0.05); this data was mainly driven by the difference in mortality, as the incidence of VA alone did not exhibit significant variation between the two groups (HR=0.7 [0.65-1.02]; p=0.23). In patients with fewer than 5 cardiac segments involved by LGE, the risk of all-cause death and significant VA was higher than in those with more than 5 segments involved (HR=2.46 [2.09-9.07]; p<0.05). Conclusions The presence of LGE emerged as a significant prognostic factor for both arrhythmic events and overall mortality. This suggests the possibility that assessing myocardial fibrosis serves as a comprehensive predictor of the patient's future clinical outcome, extending beyond merely predicting arrhythmic events. Notably, the relevance of LGE is heightened when observed in fewer than 5 segments, indicating a focal substrate, making it a crucial prognostic factor for anticipating arrhythmic events. In patients with reduced EF, pre-implantation CMR proves valuable in effectively stratifying arrhythmic risk and all-cause mortality.

Trends in adoption of extravascular cardiac implantable electronic devices: the Dutch cohort

Abstract Introduction Conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and pacemakers carry a risk of mainly pocket- and lead-related complications. To avoid these complications, extravascular devices (EVDs) have been developed, such as the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and leadless pacemaker (LP). However, data on the actual adoption of EVDs for patient or center characteristics is lacking. Purpose To assess real-world nationwide trends in adoption of EVDs in the Netherlands. Methods Using the Netherlands Heart Registration, all consecutive patients with a de novo S-ICD or conventional single-chamber ICD implantation between 2012-2020, or with a de novo LP or conventional single-chamber pacemaker implantation between 2014-2020 were included. Trends in adoption of EVDs are described for different patient and hospital characteristics (tertiles of device-implanting volume and whether cardiothoracic surgery back-up was available). Differences between patients with EVDs and non-EVDs and differences between implanting centers of EVDs and non-EVDs were tested for by Student’s T-test, Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. Trends in adoption over time were calculated with linear and logistic regression analysis. Results From 2012-2020, 2190 S-ICDs and 10683 conventional ICDs were implanted; from 2014-2020, 712 LPs and 11103 conventional pacemakers were implanted. The general adoption of both increased (S-ICDs, 8% to 21%; LPs, 1% to 8%), but the increase seems to reach a plateau (Fig. 1). S-ICD recipients were younger than conventional ICD recipients (p<0.001) and more likely to be female (p<0.001); LP recipients were younger than conventional pacemaker recipients (p<0.001) and more likely to be male (p=0.03). Both S-ICDs and LPs were mainly implanted in high-volume centers with thoracic surgery on-site (Fig. 2). Conclusions In this nationwide study we observed a relative quick adoption of innovative EVDs with a plateau after approximately 4 years. The relative adoption of S-ICDs is especially high in younger patients. EVDs are overall mainly implanted in high-volume centers with cardiothoracic surgery available. As LPs can only be implanted in centers with cardiothoracic surgery in the Netherlands, this may have limited its adoption.

Stroke after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure

Abstract Introduction In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), an elevated risk of stroke has been demonstrated in the first days after successful electrical cardioversion of AF. Shock therapies delivered by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) often result in termination of AF, potentially increasing the risk of stroke in those patients. However, the association between ICD shocks and the risk of stroke in patients with AF is unknown. Purpose To define whether there is any temporal association between ICD shocks and strokes in remotely monitored patients with heart failure (HF) and AF. Methods The clinical data of patients enrolled in the remote monitoring (RM) programme after implantation of an ICD were obtained from the single-centre COMMIT-HF registry. The data regarding the occurrence of the first stroke after inclusion to the registry were obtained (based on the International Classification of Diseases codes I63-I64) from the healthcare provider. The RM data of all patients were obtained from the investigator-initiated and -maintained registry of RM, which summarizes all major findings in remotely monitored patients in our department. Each patient with a stroke had the RM history evaluated for the period of the prior 30 days, with emphasis on the last 10 days preceding stroke. Results During the period between 2011 and 2020, 1,299 patients with detailed clinical characteristics were enrolled in the RM programme, and their clinical data are summarized in Table 1.There were 33.4% patients with AF at baseline, and AF de novo was identified during follow-up in further 14.0% of patients. Among patients without and with AF at baseline, respectively 30.9% and 34.1% received any ICD shocks during follow-up (p=NS). In 38.2% of patients without AF at baseline, who developed de novo AF, at least one shock occurred. The median follow-up was 4.4 years, and the incidence of stroke was 45 (3.5%) in the studied population, with a rate of stroke of 2.8% (25/865) in patients without AF at baseline and 4.6% (20/434) in patients with AF (p=NS), as presented in Figure 1. The median (Q1-Q3) time from ICD implantation to stroke was 1.5 (0.8-2.5) years. Strokes occurring less than 10 days from ICD shock were noted in only two patients (0.5% of patients with any ICD shock) and both occurred within 24 hours from the shock. In the first case, the device appropriately terminated ventricular tachycardia which degenerated to ventricular fibrillation after antitachycardia pacing, and in the second case, a shock therapy was delivered due to VF in a 59-year-old male with HF and concomitant paroxysmal AF, who was on chronic treatment with warfarin. Conclusions Our findings indicate an overall low risk of stroke associated with ICD shocks, both in patients with and without AF.Baseline population characteristicsAnalysed population flowchart

Catheter ablation as an adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation in Brugada Syndrome.

Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia disorder associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death. Current management primarily relies on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), but patients may experience ICD shocks. Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as a potential intervention to target the arrhythmogenic substrate. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CA in BrS patients. Studies with BrS patients undergoing CA for VAs were included. Fourteen studies that involved a total population of 709 BrS patients, with CA performed in 528 of them, were included. CA resulted in the non-inducibility of VAs in 91% (95% CI: 83-99, I2=76%) and resolution of type 1 ECG Brugada pattern in 88% (95% CI: 81-96.2, I2=91%) of the patients. After a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, 87% (95% CI: 80-94, I2=82%) of patients remained free from VAs. The incidence of VAs during follow-up was significantly lower in the ablation cohort in comparison to the group receiving only ICD therapy (OR=0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.12, I2=0%). CA shows potential as a therapeutic approach to reduce VAs and improve outcomes in BrS patients. While further research with a long follow-up period is required to confirm these findings, it represents a valuable tool as an add-on intervention to ICD implantation in BrS patients with a high burden of VAs.

Long-term Monitoring to Detect Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Inherited Arrhythmia Patients

BackgroundRisk stratification in inherited arrhythmia syndromes is challenging. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are effective in the prevention of sudden cardiac death but are associated with significant complications. We aimed to determine the value of long-term implantable loop recorder (ILR) monitoring to determine risk factors for arrhythmias in inherited arrhythmia patients. MethodsWe conducted a prospective multicentre study between 2015 and 2020 recruiting inherited arrhythmia probands and family members at intermediate arrhythmic risk, with no class 1 indication for ICD implantation. The primary endpoint was the detection by ILR of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia over ≥ 10 consecutive beats. Secondary endpoints included ICD insertion during follow-up, all-cause mortality, and ILR complication rates. ResultsA total of 45 individuals (30 female participants) were enrolled in the study. The most common diagnoses were long-QT syndrome (28%), Brugada syndrome (26%), and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (11%). Following ILR insertion (mean follow-up 633 days; range, 387-969), cardiac symptoms occurred in 19 of 45 patients (42%), 5 of whom had nonsustained ventricular tachycardias (11%), which were symptomatic in 3 individuals. This situation led to ICD implantation based on ILR in 5 of 45 patients (11%). Fifty percent of symptomatic events occurred in ARVC patients. The median time from ILR insertion to ICD implantation was 152 days (interquartile range (25th, 75th percentiles) 55 of 209). No patient experienced sudden cardiac death. ConclusionsILRs enable the detection of high-risk arrhythmic features and facilitate selection of ICD candidates in inherited arrhythmia patients with borderline indications.

WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR IN PATIENT WITH TRANSIENT RISK OF SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH : SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease is still the first cause of death, with sudden cardiac death ( SCD) as a first presentation in 25% of cases, related to coronary artery disease. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) demontrated a reduction of SCD in high risk patients with good functional status. However the risk of SCD should be transient, so the use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is considered in current guidelines and in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and the adherence to WCD in a real world population; moreover we reviewed the rate of ICD implantation after WCD use. Methods We considered consecutively 96 patients discharged from Piacenza cardiology department for potentially transient high risk of SCD, weared a WCD from August 2017 to June 2023. The patients were discharged in high risk mode of SCD with WCD protection and followed through remote monitoring or outpatient.A clinical and echocardiographic evalutation was performed at baseline and repeated at the end of the WCD use period. Results Out of 95 patients , with average age 66,0 ±11,1 years old and baseline average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 28,6±7,5, 81,2% were males, 72,9% suffered from arterial hypertension, 26% diabetes mellitus, 13,5% peripheral vascular disease, 14,6% chronic renal failure, 4,1% previous stroke.66% of these patients weared WCD for severe systolic disfunction in ischemic cardiac disease after recent myocardial infarction, after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, 4% after removal of an infected ICD, 6% whilst awaiting completion of diagnostic tests (chanalopathies/right arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy), 24% newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy. The average wearing time of WCD was 22,7±3,1 hours daily. We received these events: 1 sustained ventricular tachicardia, 2 non sustained ventricular tachicardia, 5 atrial fibrillation with 3 T wave oversensing. One patient recedived inappropriate shock. One death was detected due to severe heart failure. After 56,0±37,8 days of average wearing time 52% of patients were scheduled for ICD implantation. Conclusions In our experience we may consider that WCD use is effective, safe and with a good adherence in all patients. The WCD allows saving resources preventing inapprpriate ICD implantation in patient with transient SCD risk.

Long QT syndrome: importance of reassessing arrhythmic risk after treatment initiation.

Risk scores are proposed for genetic arrhythmias. Having proposed in 2010 one such score (M-FACT) for the long QT syndrome (LQTS), this study aims to test whether adherence to its suggestions would be appropriate. LQT1/2/3 and genotype-negative patients without aborted cardiac arrest (ACA) before diagnosis or cardiac events (CEs) below age 1 were included in the study, focusing on an M-FACT score ≥2 (intermediate/high risk), either at presentation (static) or during follow-up (dynamic), previously associated with 40% risk of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks within 4 years. Overall, 946 patients (26 ± 19 years at diagnosis, 51% female) were included. Beta-blocker (βB) therapy in 94% of them reduced the rate of those with a QTc ≥500 ms from 18% to 12% (P < .001). During 7 ± 6 years of follow-up, none died; 4% had CEs, including 0.4% with ACA. A static M-FACT ≥2 was present in 110 patients, of whom 106 received βBs. In 49/106 patients with persistent dynamic M-FACT ≥2, further therapeutic optimization (left cardiac sympathetic denervation in 55%, mexiletine in 31%, and ICD at 27%) resulted in just 7 (14%) patients with CEs (no ACA), with no CEs in the remaining 57. Additionally, 32 patients developed a dynamic M-FACT ≥2 but, after therapeutic optimization, only 3 (9%) had CEs. According to an M-FACT score ≥2, a total of 142 patients should have received an ICD, but only 22/142 (15%) were implanted, with shocks reported in 3. Beta-blockers often shorten QTc, thus changing risk scores and ICD indications for primary prevention. Yearly risk reassessment with therapy optimization leads to fewer ICD implants (3%) without increasing life-threatening events.

WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER–DEFIBRILLATORS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ANMCO POSITION PAPER FOR APPROPRIATE USE OF THE WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

Abstract Introduction Wearable cardioverter–defibrillators (WCD) have emerged as a valuable tool in the management of patients at risk for life–threatening arrhythmias. These devices offer a non–invasive and temporary solution, providing continuous monitoring and the potential for prompt defibrillation when needed. In this study, we explore the indications for WCD and evaluate arrhythmic events through comprehensive monitoring. Methods From November 2022 to December 2023, we conducted an outpatient follow–up of 18 patients receiving WCD. Regular check–ups and comprehensive echocardiography were performed to optimize therapy based on specific indications for each patient. Results The average age of the patients was 59.3±17.4 years, with 79% being male. Among the cohort, 58% had hypertension, and a similar percentage comprised smokers and individuals with dyslipidemia, while 32% were diabetic. The indications for receiving WCD were: de novo diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction in 9 (50%) patients, recent acute coronary syndrome and ejection fraction &amp;lt; 35% in 5 (28%), cardiac electronic device infections in 3 (17%) patients and myocarditis with electrical instability in 1 (5%) patient. Patients were in optimal medical therapy (OMT) tailored to their specific comorbidities, with 84% on renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, 95% on beta–blockers, 53% on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, 53% on sodium–glucose cotransporter–2 inhibitors, and 37% on antiarrhythmics. The average follow–up was 64±45 days according to specific etiology, with a daily wearing time of 22.9±1.1 hours. No device interventions were recorded. At the end of the follow–up period, 6 (33%) patients still required implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD). Among these, 4 patients (22%) underwent to ICD implantation, 3 for secondary prevention, and 1 for primary prevention, while notably, 2 (11%) patients, declined the procedure. Conclusions The use of wearable cardioverter–defibrillators in the outpatient setting for patients at risk of life–threatening arrhythmias allowed to optimize therapy and restrict the indications for ICD, in our cohort up to 67%, with a good safety profile due to the low incidence of device interventions.

New York Heart Association functional class and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Extended follow-up of the DANISH trial.

Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III. However, the evidence regarding the benefit of primary prevention ICD is less consistent in patients with NYHA class III. We investigated the long-term effects of primary prevention ICD implantation according to NYHA class in an extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial. The DANISH trial randomized 1116 patients with non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to ICD implantation or usual care. Outcomes were analysed according to NYHA class at baseline (NYHA class II and III/IV). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Of the 1116 patients randomized in the DANISH trial, 597 (53.5%) were in NYHA class II at baseline, 505 (45.3%) in NYHA class III, and 14 (1.3%) in NYHA class IV. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, NYHA class III/IV, compared with NYHA class II, were associated with a greater long-term rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.93) and cardiovascular death (HR 1.95 [1.47-2.60]). ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the long-term rate of all-cause mortality (all participants: HR 0.89 [95% CI 0.74-1.08]; NYHA class II: HR 0.85 [0.64-1.13]; NYHA class III/IV: HR 0.89 [0.69-1.14]; pinteraction = 0.78) or cardiovascular death (all participants: HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.09]; NYHA class II: HR 0.78 [0.54-1.12]; NYHA class III/IV: HR 0.89 [0.67-1.19]; pinteraction = 0.58), irrespective of NYHA class. Similarly, NYHA class did not modify the beneficial effects of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (all participants: HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.40-0.92]; NYHA class II: HR 0.73 [0.40-1.36]; NYHA class III/IV: HR 0.52 [0.29-0.94]; pinteraction = 0.39). In patients with non-ischaemic HFrEF, ICD implantation, compared with usual care, did not reduce the overall mortality rate, but it did reduce sudden cardiovascular death, regardless of baseline NYHA class. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00542945.

Efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients without an ICD implantation

BackgroundThe implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) prevents sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Catheter ablation has been shown to effectively reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence, yet its efficacy in patients without an ICD implantation remains uncertain. ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the outcomes of ablation for VT in patients with ICM without a backup ICD. MethodsPatients with ICM who received ablation for VT without an ICD implantation were included in this study. Ablation was guided by either activation mapping or substrate mapping. Endocardial ablation was the primary strategy; epicardial access was considered when endocardial ablation failed. The primary end point was VT recurrence during follow-up; secondary end points included cardiovascular rehospitalization, all-cause mortality, and a composite of these events. ResultsA total of 114 patients were included, with the mean age of 58.2 ± 11.1 years, 102 of whom (89.5%) were male. Twelve patients (10.5%) underwent endo-epicardial ablation, whereas the rest received endocardial ablation. With a median follow-up of 53.8 months (24.8–84.2 months), VT recurred in 45 patients (39.5%), and 6 patients (5.3%) died, including 2 sudden cardiac deaths. The recurrence rate of VT was significantly lower in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation than in those with endocardial ablation only (8.3% vs 43.1%; log-rank P = .032). After multivariate adjustment, epicardial ablation remained associated with a reduced risk of VT recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% confidential interval, 0.02–0.98; P = .048). ConclusionPatients with ICM undergoing VT ablation without a backup ICD experienced a notably low rate of arrhythmic death. Most recurrences proved nonlethal.

Machine learning for prediction of ventricular arrhythmia episodes from intracardiac electrograms of automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

BackgroundDespite effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in saving patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), the temporal occurrence of VA after ICD implantation is unpredictable. ObjectiveThe study aimed to apply machine learning (ML) to intracardiac electrograms (IEGMs) recorded by ICDs as a unique biomarker for predicting impending VAs. MethodsThe study included 13,516 patients who received Biotronik ICDs and enrolled in the CERTITUDE registry between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Database extraction included IEGMs from standard quarterly transmissions and VA event episodes. The processed IEGM data were pulled from device transmissions stored in a centralized Home Monitoring Service Center and reformatted into an analyzable format. Long-range (baseline or first scheduled remote recording), mid-range (scheduled remote recording every 90 days), or short-range predictions (IEGM within 5 seconds before the VA onset) were used to determine whether ML-processed IEGMs predicted impending VA events. Convolutional neural network classifiers using ResNet architecture were employed. ResultsOf 13,516 patients (male, 72%; age, 67.5 ± 11.9 years), 301,647 IEGM recordings were collected; 27,845 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were observed in 4467 patients (33.0%). Neural networks based on convolutional neural networks using ResNet-like architectures on far-field IEGMs yielded an area under the curve of 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.79–0.87 in the short term, whereas the long-range and mid-range analyses had minimal predictive value for VA events. ConclusionIn this study, applying ML to ICD-acquired IEGMs predicted impending ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation events seconds before they occurred, whereas midterm to long-term predictions were not successful. This could have important implications for future device therapies.

Predictors of Unfavorable Prognosis in Patients with Heart Failure After Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation According to the Prospective Part of the Kuzbass Registry.

Identification of clinical and instrumental predictors for non-arrhythmic death in patients with heart failure (HF) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Through a telephone survey and examination of medical records from hospital and polyclinic databases, data were obtained on the alive/dead status and causes of death for 260 patients with heart failure (HF) and ICD included in the Kuzbass Registry of Patients with ICD. The follow-up period was 1.5 years. Clinical and instrumental parameters entered into the registry before the ICD implantation were included in a univariate and multivariate step-by-step analysis using the logistic (for qualitative variables) and linear (for quantitative variables) regression with calculation of regression coefficients and construction of a prognostic regression model. The quality of the created model was assessed using a ROC analysis. During the observation period, 54 (20.8%) patients died. In 21 (38.8%) patients, death occurred in the hospital and was caused by acute decompensated heart failure in 15 (71.4%) patients, myocardial infarction in 3 (14.3%) patients, stroke in 1 (4.7%) patient, and pneumonia in 2 (9.5%) patients. 33 (61.2%) patients died outside the hospital; the cause of death was stated as the underlying disease associated with acute decompensated heart failure: in 9 (27.2%) patients, dilated cardiomyopathy; in 1 (3.0%) patient, rheumatic mitral disease; and in 23 (69.7%) patients, ischemic cardiomyopathy. According to the univariate regression model, the risk of death in the long-term period was increased by the QT interval prolongation (U 2.41, p = 0.0161); elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (U 4.30, p=0.0000) and increased left atrial size according to echocardiography (U 2.98, p=0.0029); stage IIB HF (OR 2.41; 95% CI: 1.26-4.6), NYHA III-IV (OR 3.03; 95% CI: 1.58-5.81); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 5.24; 95% CI: 2.04-13.45); and lack of optimal drug therapy (ODT) for HF before ICD implantation (OR 2.41; 95% CI: 1.29-4.49). The multivariate analysis identified the most significant factors included in the prognostic regression model: pulmonary artery systolic pressure above 45 mm Hg, social status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lack of ODT for HF. To ensure a maximum benefit from ICD, the factors that increase the likelihood of non-arrhythmic death should be considered before making a decision on ICD implantation. Particular attention should be paid to mandatory ODT for HF as the main modifiable risk factor for unfavorable prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the elderly—The I-70 Study: A randomized clinical trial

There is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in the elderly. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of ICD implantation in patients 70 years and older. Patients (n = 167) aged 70 years or older and eligible for ICD implantation were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either optimal medical therapy (OMT) (n = 85) or OMT plus ICD (n = 82). Of the 167 participants (mean age 76.4 years; 165 men), 144 completed the study protocol according to their assigned treatment. Average participant follow-up was 31.5 months. Mortality was similar between the 2 groups: 27 deaths in OMT vs 26 death in ICD (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.57), but there was a trend favoring the ICD over the first 36 months of follow-up. Rates of sudden death (7 vs 5; P = .81) and all-cause hospitalization (2.65 events per participant in OMT vs 3.09 in ICD; P = .31) were not statistically significantly different. Eleven participants randomized to ICD received appropriate therapy. Five participants received an inappropriate therapy that included at least 1 ICD shock. The study did not recruit to target sample size, and accumulated data did not show benefit of ICD therapy in patients 70 years or older. Future studies similar in design might be feasible but will need to contend with patient treatment preference given the large number of patients who do not want an ICD implanted. Further research is needed to determine whether the ICD is effective in prolonging life among elderly device candidates.

Patient characteristics, predictors and outcome of pacemaker patients upgraded to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Pacemaker (PM) patients may require a subsequent upgrade to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Limited data exists on this patient population. We sought to characterize this population, to assess predictors for ICD upgrade, and to report the outcome. From our prospective PM and ICD implantation registry, all patients who underwent PM and/or ICD implantations at our center were analyzed. Patient characteristics and outcomes of PM patients with subsequent ICD upgrade were compared to age- and sex-matched patients with de novo ICD implantation, and to PM patients without subsequent upgrade. Of 1'301 ICD implantations, 60 (5%) were upgraded from PMs. Median time from PM implantation to ICD upgrade was 2.6 years (IQR 1.3-5.4). Of 2'195 PM patients, 28 patients underwent subsequent ICD upgrades, corresponding to an estimated annual incidence of an ICD upgrade of at least 0.33%. Lower LVEF (p=.05) and male sex (p=.038) were independent predictors for ICD upgrade. Survival without death, transplant and LVAD implantation were worse both for upgraded ICD patients compared to matched patients with de novo ICD implantation (p=.05), as well as for PM patients with subsequent upgrade compared to matched PM patients not requiring an upgrade (p=.036). One of 20 ICD implantations are upgrade of patients with a PM. At least one of 30 PM patients will require an ICD upgrade in the following 10 years. Predictors for ICD upgrade are male sex and lower LVEF at PM implantation. Upgraded patients have worse outcomes.

Impact of preventive substrate catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and infarct-related coronary chronic total occlusion.

Primary prevention patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome's components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7 ± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.94; P = 0.037]. Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P = 0.039) and the electrical storms (Log-rank: P = 0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P = 0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P = 0.151). Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs.

Assessment of ICD eligibility in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients: aposition statement by the Task Force of the Dutch Society of Cardiology.

International guidelines recommend implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with aleft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35% despite optimal medical therapy and alife expectancy of more than 1year with good functional status. We propose refinement of these recommendations in patients with NICM, with careful consideration of additional risk parameters for both arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic death. These additional parameters include late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing for high-risk genetic variants to further assess arrhythmic risk, and age, comorbidities and sex for assessment of non-arrhythmic mortality risk. Moreover, several risk modifiers should be taken into account, such as concomitant arrhythmias that may affect LVEF (atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular beats) and resynchronisation therapy. Even though currently no valid cut-off values have been established, the proposed approach provides amore careful consideration of risks that may result in withholding ICD implantation in patients with low arrhythmic risk and substantial non-arrhythmic mortality risk.

Endomyocardial biopsy: safety and prognostic utility in paediatric and adult myocarditis in the European Society of Cardiology EURObservational Research Programme Cardiomyopathy and Myocarditis Long-Term Registry.

Contemporary multicentre data on clinical and diagnostic spectrum and outcome in myocarditis are limited. Study aims were to describe baseline features, 1-year follow-up, and baseline predictors of outcome in clinically suspected or biopsy-proven myocarditis (2013 European Society of Cardiology criteria) in adult and paediatric patients from the EURObservational Research Programme Cardiomyopathy and Myocarditis Long-Term Registry. Five hundred eighty-one (68.0% male) patients, 493 adults, median age 38 (27-52) years, and 88 children, aged 8 (3-13) years, were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n = 233), clinically suspected myocarditis with abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance; Group 2 (n = 222), biopsy-proven myocarditis; and Group 3 (n = 126) clinically suspected myocarditis with normal or inconclusive or no cardiac magnetic resonance. Baseline features were analysed overall, in adults vs. children, and among groups. One-year outcome events included death/heart transplantation, ventricular assist device (VAD) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, and hospitalization for cardiac causes. Endomyocardial biopsy, mainly right ventricular, had a similarly low complication rate in children and adults (4.7% vs. 4.9%, P = NS), with no procedure-related death. A classical myocarditis pattern on cardiac magnetic resonance was found in 31.3% of children and in 57.9% of adults with biopsy-proven myocarditis (P < .001). At 1-year follow-up, 11/410 patients (2.7%) died, 7 (1.7%) received a heart transplant, 3 underwent VAD (0.7%), and 16 (3.9%) underwent ICD implantation. Independent predictors at diagnosis of death or heart transplantation or hospitalization or VAD implantation or ICD implantation at 1-year follow-up were lower left ventricular ejection fraction and the need for immunosuppressants for new myocarditis diagnosis refractory to non-aetiology-driven therapy. Endomyocardial biopsy was safe, and cardiac magnetic resonance using Lake Louise criteria was less sensitive, particularly in children. Virus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis was predominant both in children and adults, and use of immunosuppressive treatments was low. Lower left ventricular ejection fraction and the need for immunosuppressants at diagnosis were independent predictors of unfavourable outcome events at 1 year.

Ethical use of artificial intelligence to prevent sudden cardiac death: an interview study of patient perspectives

BackgroundThe emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has prompted the development of numerous ethical guidelines, while the involvement of patients in the creation of these documents lags behind. As part of the European PROFID project we explore patient perspectives on the ethical implications of AI in care for patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD).AimExplore perspectives of patients on the ethical use of AI, particularly in clinical decision-making regarding the implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).MethodsSemi-structured, future scenario-based interviews were conducted among patients who had either an ICD and/or a heart condition with increased risk of SCD in Germany (n = 9) and the Netherlands (n = 15). We used the principles of the European Commission’s Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI to structure the interviews.ResultsSix themes arose from the interviews: the ability of AI to rectify human doctors’ limitations; the objectivity of data; whether AI can serve as second opinion; AI explainability and patient trust; the importance of the ‘human touch’; and the personalization of care. Overall, our results reveal a strong desire among patients for more personalized and patient-centered care in the context of ICD implantation. Participants in our study express significant concerns about the further loss of the ‘human touch’ in healthcare when AI is introduced in clinical settings. They believe that this aspect of care is currently inadequately recognized in clinical practice. Participants attribute to doctors the responsibility of evaluating AI recommendations for clinical relevance and aligning them with patients’ individual contexts and values, in consultation with the patient.ConclusionThe ‘human touch’ patients exclusively ascribe to human medical practitioners extends beyond sympathy and kindness, and has clinical relevance in medical decision-making. Because this cannot be replaced by AI, we suggest that normative research into the ‘right to a human doctor’ is needed. Furthermore, policies on patient-centered AI integration in clinical practice should encompass the ethics of everyday practice rather than only principle-based ethics. We suggest that an empirical ethics approach grounded in ethnographic research is exceptionally well-suited to pave the way forward.

Long-term reliability of the phospholamban (PLN) p.(Arg14del) risk model in predicting major ventricular arrhythmia: a landmark study.

Recently, a genetic variant-specific prediction model for phospholamban (PLN) p.(Arg14del)-positive individuals was developed to predict individual major ventricular arrhythmia (VA) risk to support decision-making for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. This model predicts major VA risk from baseline data, but iterative evaluation of major VA risk may be warranted considering that the risk factors for major VA are progressive. Our aim is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PLN p.(Arg14del) risk model at 3-year follow-up. We performed a landmark analysis 3 years after presentation and selected only patients with no prior major VA. Data were collected of 268 PLN p.(Arg14del)-positive subjects, aged 43.5 ± 16.3 years, 38.9% male. After the 3 years landmark, subjects had a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (± 3.5 years) and 28 (10%) subjects experienced major VA with an annual event rate of 2.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-3.6], defined as sustained VA, appropriate ICD intervention, or (aborted) sudden cardiac death. The PLN p.(Arg14del) risk score yielded good discrimination in the 3 years landmark cohort with a C-statistic of 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) and calibration slope of 0.97. The PLN p.(Arg14del) risk model has sustained good model performance up to 3 years follow-up in PLN p.(Arg14del)-positive subjects with no history of major VA. It may therefore be used to support decision-making for primary prevention ICD implantation not merely at presentation but also up to at least 3 years of follow-up.

Regional disparities and risk factors of mortality among patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death in emerging countries: a nonrandomized controlled trial

BackgroundComprehensive data on patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in emerging countries are lacking. The aim was to deepen our understanding of the SCD phenotype and identify risk factors for death among patients at high risk of SCD in emerging countries.MethodsPatients who met the class I indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to guideline recommendations in 17 countries and regions underrepresented in previous trials were enrolled. Countries were stratified by the WHO regional classification. Patients were or were not implanted with an ICD at their discretion. The outcomes were all-cause mortality and SCD.ResultsWe enrolled 4222 patients, and 3889 patients were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up period was 21.6 ± 10.2 months. There were 433 (11.1%) instances of all-cause mortality and 117 (3.0%) cases of SCD. All-cause mortality was highest in primary prevention (PP) patients from Southeast Asia and secondary prevention (SP) patients from the Middle East and Africa. The SCD rates among PP and SP patients were both highest in South Asia. Multivariate Cox regression modelling demonstrated that in addition to the independent predictors identified in previous studies, both geographic region and ICD use were associated with all-cause mortality in patients with high SCD risk. Primary prophylactic ICD implantation was associated with a 36% (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.531–0.802, p < 0.0001) lower all-cause mortality risk and an 80% (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.116–0.343, p < 0.0001) lower SCD risk.ConclusionsThere was significant heterogeneity among patients with high SCD risk in emerging countries. The influences of geographic regions on patient characteristics and outcomes were significant. Improvement in increasing ICD utilization and uptake of guideline-directed medical therapy in emerging countries is urgent.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02099721.