Purpose Mandibular reconstruction with microvascular free fibula flap (MFFF) is widely used after oncologic resection as it allows functional and aesthetical restoration of the mandibular arch and implant-retained prostheses. The aim of the series is to propose a decisional tree diagram to choose the type of prosthesis through clinical experience and review of the literature. Material and method Patients treated with MFFF and prosthetically rehabilitated were included. Number of osteotomies, number of implants, type of prosthesis, follow up after the placement of prosthesis, pre-implant surgery and peri-implant complications were reported. Subjective criteria such as patient’s satisfaction and improvement of masticatory function were collected. Results Twenty-four patients were included. Number of osteotomies ranges from 0 (9 patients) to 2 (2 patients). Four patients underwent preimplantation surgery on soft tissues and 3 on bone. Seventy-four implants were placed, 4 remained unloaded, and 1 was lost before loading. Ten patients had implant-supported dentures and 14 had fixed prostheses. Prosthetic follow-up was over 5 years for 15 patients and under 1 year for 1 patient. Peri-implant complication was hyperplasia for 7 patients. Patients’ satisfaction was good and masticatory improvement was moderate. Discussion Prosthetic rehabilitation on MFFF evolutes to fixed prosthesis. Nonetheless, it is more complicated to realize, and requires a sufficient number of implants. Peri-implant complications such as hyperplasia seem to occur more often. Implant-retained dentures seem preferable in case of important aesthetical alteration, although fixed hybrid “Branemark like” prosthesis remain a good alternative. Improvement of mastication is more important in patients with large rehabilitations but remain quite disappointing. Finally, one should wonder whether dental restoration is necessary in case of small lateral flaps.
Read full abstract