Reviewed by: Pepuza and Tymion: The Discovery and Archaeological Exploration of a Lost Ancient City and an Imperial Estate Stephen Mitchell William Tabbernee and Peter Lampe, Pepuza and Tymion: The Discovery and Archaeological Exploration of a Lost Ancient City and an Imperial Estate. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008 Pp. xx + 338; numerous figs.; two fold-out maps. In July 2000, appropriately marking the beginning of a new millennium, William Tabbernee, author of the authoritative Montanist Inscriptions and Testimonia (1997), was shown a bilingual inscription in the Turkish museum of Uşak including a Latin rescript of the emperors Septimius Severus and Caracalla addressed to the community of the Tymii at the beginning of the third century C.E. This clue led him to the identification of Tymion, which was named with Pepuza as being at the center of the Montanist movement and the location of the New Jerusalem, prophesied in Rev 21, by the virtually contemporary Christian writer, Apollonius (cited in Eusebius, h.e. 5.18.2). Two days later Tabbernee and his companions identified a highly plausible site for Pepuza itself, a large Roman and late Roman settlement, alongside an apparent monastic complex cut into [End Page 490] the cliff face, on the northern bank of the Banaz Çay, the ancient river Senaros, in western Phrygia. This book is a report of these discoveries and of four seasons of archaeological fieldwork between 2001 and 2004, mainly concentrated on the town and monastic site of Pepuza, directed by Professor Peter Lampe of Heidelberg, in close collaboration with Tabbernee. The presentation is lavish, tending to redundancy. The entire text is presented in English and German versions, printed in parallel columns, with a Turkish translation at the end of each chapter. These translations are not always entirely accurate. Moreover, much of the content of the book, in a strict sense, is not new. The crucial Latin inscription, containing the Severan rescript, has been published: an editio princeps by the Turkish epigrapher C. Tanriver, with detailed commentary by Tor Hauken (Epigraphica Anatolica 36 [2003]: 33–44) and an edition by Lampe and Tabbernee themselves (Epigraphica Anatolica 37 [2004]: 169–78), which corrects a number of minor faulty readings in ed. pr. Chapter Four now presents further discussion by Tabbernee. The topographical information regarding Tymion in this text is incontestable. It was addressed to the colonis Tymiorum et Simoen[sium], a restoration that corrects Simoen[tium] which was preferred in EA 2004. It must be said, however, that none of the published editions offers a convincing restoration and interpretation of the rescript, which requires longer discussion elsewhere. The topographical implications of this discovery have already been explored in an excellent article by Tabbernnee (JECS 11 [2003]: 87–93), including the intriguing suggestion that the whole table-land which stretched about twelve kilometers from Pepuza to Tymion might have been seen by Montanists as the literal extent of the New Jerusalem, which would descend from heaven according to the prophecy of Rev 21. The second half of the book, largely written by Lampe, covers the discoveries of the field seasons. The aims are ambitious: to use interdisciplinary approaches to account for remains of all periods in the region (134), and sensitive survey techniques as tools for exploring not only the social and economic history, but also the religiosity of the inhabitants of ancient Phrygia (143). This is methodologically challenging and there is a long way yet to go. Chapters Nine through Twelve are simply preliminary reports of the archaeological survey, including geophysical prospecting of underground remains, without excavation. In fact they correspond closely to the series of preliminary reports presented at the annual symposia of the results of archaeology in Turkey, published respectively in Araştirma Sonuçları Toplantısı 20 (2003), 1–9 (in English), 21 (2004), 109–18 (German), 22 (2005), 151–57 (Turkish), and 23 (2006), 385–88 (German), with many of the same illustrations as are used in the book. These accounts, as might be expected at this stage, are descriptive rather than analytical. Few of the finds, including the pottery, are chronologically diagnostic, and the buildings are badly ruined. The identification (167–69) of a supposed basilica as...