He that toucheth pitch, shall be defiled with it: and he that hath fellowship with the proud, shall put on pride.Ecclesiastes 13:1Voicy l'endroit le plus important de ce discours: car puis que la diuersite des humeurs ne peut long-temps subsister dans la Conuersation, il faut a la fin imiter les vitieux ou les hair. Il faut leur estre semblable, ou ennemy; il faut en communiquant auec eux. . . espouser leur malice, ou s'en deffendre. Mais quand on seroit asseure de la victoire, quel besoin est-il de se donner la peine de les combattre, puis qu'il y a tousiours bien moins de danger Oc d'incommodite en la fuite, qu'en la resistance.[See here the most important point of this discourse, for since the diversity of humours cannot long subsist in Conversation, they must at last either imitate the vicious, or hate them, they must either be like them or be their enemies; they must in complying with them . . . put on their malice, or contest against it. But though they were certaine of the victory, what need is there to take the paines to combat with them, while there is alwaies lesse danger and incommodity in the flight, than in the fight?]Jacques Du Bosc (1632)1Is someone who converses with a bad person in danger of being infected with badness? Karl Ludwig, palsgrave of the Rhine and elector Palatine, seemed to think so. To borrow the metaphor used in Ecclesiastes, the pitch that Karl Ludwig feared would defile his family was coquetry, which he believed was at large in the House of Palatine in the person of his wife, Charlotte of HesseKassel. As a result, the elector harangued the electress incessantly about her flirtatiousness, tried to wring a written confession of coquetry from her, sent her brother the landgrave of Hesse-Kassel a book on the evils of coquetry, and groped her breasts at the Imperial Diet in front of the emperor himself as a rebuke for her having chosen a dress that displayed her cleavage like 'la coquette la plus declaree' (the most unabashed coquette).2 Convinced that Charlotte's coquetry was incurable and her refusal to let him share her bed was final, Karl Ludwig divorced her in 1657. Adamant that their daughter Elisabeth Charlotte should inherit nothing from her mother but her second Christian name, Karl Ludwig inserted a clause in the employment contract of the girl's governess stipulating that Elisabeth Charlotte, or 'Liselotte', must at all times be shielded from conversations and books that encourage coquetry.3 To prevent Liselotte from having fellowship with her mother and potentially putting on her saucy ways, in 1659 Karl Ludwig packed the seven-year-old off to Hanover to live for several years with his sister Sophie, who dutifully assured him that little Liselotte would not learn coquetry at her court.4Twenty years later the issue of coquetry was still current when Sophie visited her former charge at the French court where Liselotte resided as duchess of Orleans, or 'Madame', the title she bore as the wife of 'Monsieur', Louis XIVs younger brother Philippe, duke of Orleans. It is Madame's good conduct, Sophie reports to Karl Ludwig, that earns her Louis XIVs friendship, for she is not infected with any coquetry (Sophie, Briefwechsel, p. 376). And in 1718, some sixty years after her governess was exhorted to protect her from the baleful influence of coquetry, Madame confesses in a letter to her half-sister Amelise (one of the thirteen fruits of Karl Ludwig's second marriage) that she converses at court with coquettes and gallant women. The matter is important enough for Madame to explain herself in considerable detail over the course of several letters in an effort to allay Amelise's concern that her conversations with bad people will infect her with badness. In the words of the second epigraph to this essay, Du Bosc's L'Honneste femme (a book, coincidentally, listed in the catalogue of Madame's personal library), Madame must dispel the fear that a 'diversity of humours cannot long subsist in Conversation' and that, when conversing with the vicious, she must necessarily 'put on their malice, or contest against it'. …