Activities Of Daily Living Impairment Research Articles

The clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with impaired activity daily living

Abstract Background Previous studies have indicated that activities of daily living (ADL) can influence the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study is to delineate the clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have impaired ADL. Methods The data for this study were derived from a Health and Medical Big Data Superplatform, comprising a retrospective cohort of patients admitted to and discharged from 72 secondary and tertiary hospitals from 2010 to 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with a discharge diagnosis of STEMI.ADL prior to STEMI was evaluated using the Barthel index(BI),a widely used assessment tool for evaluating ADL.The patients' BI were obtained from their resident health records.Patients were categorized into two groups: ADL normal group and ADL impaired group. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups regarding clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and prognosis. Results This study included 24,906 STEMI patients with normal ADL and 1,002 STEMI patients with impaired ADL. Baseline data revealed that patients in the ADL impaired group had a higher proportion of females (43.0% vs. 37.8%, p=0.001), were older (74.0[64.0,81.0] vs. 69.0[65.0,75.0], p<0.001), and had a higher proportion of Killip III and above (24.30% vs. 14.10%, p<0.001). Additionally, the ADL impaired group had a higher prevalence of comorbidities. In terms of treatment, the ADL impaired group had lower proportions of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (43.8% vs. 65.3%, p<0.001) and primary PCI (PPCI) (36.4% vs. 55.1%, p<0.001). Additionally, the ADL impaired group exhibited lower utilization rates of antiplatelet drugs, ACEI/ARB, beta-blockers, ARNI, and statins, but higher rates of diuretics and cardiac glycosides. Regarding prognosis, the ADL impaired group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (5.69% vs. 2.89%, p<0.001). The median follow-up time was 1,220 days. In the ADL impaired group, the rates of all-cause mortality (52.0% vs. 24.7%, p<0.001), cardiovascular mortality (37.3% vs. 17.3%, p<0.001), recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (11.1% vs. 8.30%, p=0.002), and recurrent stroke (11.9% vs. 8.66%, p=0.001) were higher. However, the rate of revascularization was lower in the ADL impaired group (6.69% vs. 9.20%, p=0.008), and the risk of cerebral hemorrhage showed no significant difference (1.00% vs. 0.81%, p=0.631). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, gender, Killip, medical history, and treatment strategies, impaired ADL remained an independent risk factor for increased all-cause mortality (aHR 1.309, 95% CI: 1.195-1.434, p<0.001). Conclusions Impairment of ADL is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.Baseline characteristics of patientsMedications of patients

The clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with impaired activity daily living

Abstract Background Impaired activities of daily living (ADL) have been identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and prognosis of acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with impaired ADL. Methods The data for this study were derived from a Health and Medical Big Data Superplatform, comprising a retrospective cohort of patients admitted to and discharged from 72 secondary and tertiary hospitals from 2010 to 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with a discharge diagnosis of NSTEMI.ADL prior to NSTEMI was evaluated using the Barthel index(BI),a widely used assessment tool for evaluating ADL.The patients' BI were obtained from patients’ resident health records, and patients were categorized into two groups: ADL normal and ADL impaired group. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups regarding clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and prognosis. Results The study included 28,227 NSTEMI patients with normal ADL and 1,576 NSTEMI patients with impaired ADL. Baseline data revealed that the ADL impaired group had a higher proportion of females (49.4% vs. 43.2%, p < 0.001), older age (77.0 [69.0, 83.0] vs. 71.0 [66.0, 78.0], p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of patients with KILLIP III and above (25.86% vs. 17.44%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the ADL impaired group had a greater number of pre-existing comorbidities. Regarding treatment, the proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was significantly lower in the ADL impaired group (16.5% vs. 65.3%, p < 0.001). Moreover, the ADL impaired group showed lower utilization rates of antiplatelet agents, ACEI/ARBs, beta-blockers, ARNI, statins, and nitrates, while the utilization rates of diuretics and cardiac glycosides were higher. In terms of prognosis, the ADL impaired group exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality rate (6.03% vs. 3.35%, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 876 days, the ADL impaired group had significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality (61.2% vs. 35.9%, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (41.8% vs. 24.8%, p < 0.001), while the rate of revascularization (6.69% vs. 9.20%, p = 0.008) was lower. There were no significant differences in the risks of recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (10.7% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.935), recurrent stroke (10.90% vs. 9.48%, p = 0.08), and hemorrhagic stroke (0.82% vs. 0.74%, p = 0.806). Following adjustment for age, gender, KILLIP classification, medical history, and treatment strategies in a multivariable Cox regression analysis, impaired ADL remained an independent risk factor for increased all-cause mortality (aHR 1.167, 95%CI: 1.091-1.249, p < 0.001). Conclusions The decline in ADL is significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes among NSTEMI patients.Baseline characteristics of patientsMedications of patients

Association of Spouses’ Sensory Loss with Depressive Symptoms, Self-Reported Health, and Functional Disability Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate cross-sectional associations between spouses’ sensory loss and depressive symptoms, self-rated health, and functional disability. Methods We included 10,410 individuals from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. We used the cross-sectional design and determined hearing loss, vision loss, and dual sensory loss by self-reports. We assessed depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. We assessed self-reported health status using one item. Functional disability was defined as having difficulties in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Results Individuals with spouses’ dual sensory loss had a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (45.19%), ADL (17.31%), and IADL impairments (21.97%) and a lower rate of self-rated good health (20.78%) than those with no or single loss. Spouse’s sensory loss was associated with depressive symptoms, self-rated health, ADL, and IADL impairments (p < .05). Husbands’ ADL impairments were associated with wives’ vision loss (p < .05). Wives’ IADL impairments were associated with husbands’ hearing loss (p < .05). Conclusions Spouses’ sensory loss was related to depressive symptoms, self-rated health, ADL, and IADL impairments. There was a gender specificity in the effect of spousal vision loss or hearing loss on ADL and IADL impairments.

Clinical characteristics and impairment of activities of daily living among patients with myasthenia gravis with differing degrees of muscle weakness: a real-world study of patients in the US and five European countries

BackgroundReal-world data were employed to determine clinical characteristics of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) with differing degrees of muscle weakness, as defined using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification system.MethodsData were drawn from the Adelphi MG Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a multinational (United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom) survey completed by physicians and their patients with MG in 2020. The association between MGFA class and impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) was tested using linear regression adjusting for sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Bivariate comparisons were performed for each individual item. A range of other clinical characteristics were also explored according to MGFA class.ResultsAmong 1232 patients, those in MGFA class I had significantly lower ADL impairment versus class II or III/IV (adjusted for sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index) (p < 0.01). However, heterogeneity occurred within each MGFA class. Bulbar symptoms (impaired speech, difficulty swallowing, and/or difficulty chewing/choking on food) were reported in some class I patients (mild in 1.1–1.9% and moderate in 0.3–1.1% of patients) and class II patients (mild in 8.5–16.4%, moderate in 4.7–7.4%, and severe in 0.3–0.9% of patients), and shortness of breath was reported in some class I (mild in 0.5% of patients) and class II patients (mild in 9.8%, moderate in 4.8%, and severe in 0.3% of patients). Conversely, in 11.2–19.2% of class III/IV patients, bulbar symptoms and shortness of breath reported were only mild in severity. In line with this finding, despite significant correlations between MGFA class and several clinical characteristics, patients across every class were at risk of experiencing myasthenic crisis or hospitalization, experiencing comorbidities including anxiety and depression, and not being in remission.ConclusionsAlthough MGFA class correlates with greater ADL impairment and presence of other clinical characteristics, there is variability between patients in each class in terms of symptoms experienced, overall disease burden, and the precise nature of ADL impairment.

Usefulness of non-surgical treatment without weight bearing restriction versus surgical treatment for maintaining activities of daily living in patients with peri-prosthetic femoral fractures.

Non-surgical treatment without weight-bearing restriction, even in the early post-injury phase, may have a favourable effect on the activities of daily living (ADLs) in elderly patients with peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatments for PFFs in terms of ADL maintenance and clinical safety. This retrospective cohort study included 44 patients with PFFs proximal to the stem fixation site without stem loosening. Rehabilitation with weight bearing was initiated after internal fixation of the fracture site in the surgical group (n = 12) and immediately after the injury in the non-surgical group (n = 32). Clinical and radiological outcomes, including time until the first weight-bearing exercise, time until independent walking, ADL deterioration, and bone union rate, were compared between groups. Independent risk factors for ADL deterioration were also evaluated. The time until first weight-bearing exercise was shorter and the ADL deterioration rate was smaller in the non-surgical group than in the surgical group (8.8 ± 9.2 vs. 21 ± 13 days, P = 0.004; 6.2% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.04, respectively). Bone union rates were similar between groups (91% vs. 83%, P = 0.42), and aseptic loosening of the stem was not observed. Time until first weight-bearing exercise was identified as an independent risk factor for ADL deterioration (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.26; P = 0.03). Non-surgical treatment of PFFs proximal to the stem fixation site without stem loosening, which does not restrict early weight-bearing exercise after injury, is an effective and safe treatment procedure that maintains ADL performance in elderly patients.

Impairment of perioperative activities of daily living is associated with poor prognosis following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.

It has reported that the prevalence of frailty in patients with pancreatic cancer is 45%. The number of patients with pancreatic cancer is increasing, and within this cohort, patients often suffer from impaired activities of daily living (ADLs). This study aimed to examine the association between perioperative Barthel Index (BI) scores, a validated measure of ADLs, and survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. We analyzed the data of 201 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2010 and 2020. Preoperative and postoperative ADLs were assessed using the BI (range: 0-100; higher scores indicated greater independence). A preoperative or postoperative BI score ≤ 85 was defined as an impairment of perioperative ADLs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) after adjusting for potential confounders. Among the 201 patients, 14 (7.0%) had a preoperative BI score ≤ 85 and 50 (25%) had a postoperative BI score ≤ 85. Impairment of perioperative ADLs was independently associated with shorter overall survival (multivariable HR: 2.66, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.75-4.03, P < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (multivariable HR: 2.64, 95%CI: 1.15-4.25, P < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (multivariable HR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.08-3.50, P = 0.021). Impairment of perioperative ADLs is associated with poor prognosis following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. The maintenance and improvement of perioperative ADLs could play an important role in providing favorable long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Sex, gender, and stroke recovery: Functional limitations and inpatient care needs in Canadian and European survivors.

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability among survivors. Past literature already investigated the biological sex differences in stroke outcome; still limited work on gender differences is published. Therefore, the study aimed at investigating whether biological sex and sociocultural gender of survivors play a role as determinants of disability and quality of life among stroke survivors across Europe and Canada. Data were gathered from the European Health Information Survey (EHIS, n = 316,333) and Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS, n = 127,462) data sets. Main outcomes of interest were disability, assessed through evaluating the impairment of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL), and inpatient care needs, such as hospitalization or institutionalization. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to identify factors independently associated with outcomes. Federated analysis was conducted for cross-country comparisons. Data were adjusted for the country-specific Gender Inequality Index (GII), with higher score corresponding to more gender inequality toward females. Female survivors showed greater impairments in iADL (odds ratio [OR] = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.53-1.96) and ADL (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.44), without a corresponding increase in inpatient care needs. Socioeconomic factors such as marital status and income level were significant predictors of disability, with low income and being single/divorced associated with higher risks. The impact of sex was more pronounced in countries with higher GII, indicating the influence of gender inequality on stroke outcomes. The findings highlight the significant impact of biological sex and gender-related social determinants on post stroke disability, with female sex and unfavorable socioeconomic conditions being associated with worse outcomes.

Preoperative geriatric assessment to predict functional outcome after major urologic operations: Results from a multicenter study

IntroductionMajor urological tumor surgery entails a severe risk of unexpected adverse events, persistent functional deterioration, and death in older patients. The Erlangen Index (EI) geriatric assessment tool has previously been shown to predict incomplete functional recovery following major urological tumor surgery in an elderly patient collective. We prospectively evaluated assessment tools including EI in a multicenter setting. Materials and methodsA total of 340 patients over the age of 65 were assessed prospectively before and after cystectomy, prostatectomy, or renal tumor surgery at three academic centers in Germany and Austria. Endpoints were long-term functional deterioration (Activities of daily living (ADL) measured by Barthel-Index) at day 30 and day 180, and mortality at day 180. ResultsIn this study 58 (17.0 %) patients underwent cystectomy, 140 (41.2 %) prostatectomy and 142 (41.8 %) a kidney tumor operation. Mean age was 74.8 years. ADL impairment as a measure of incomplete recovery at day 30 and 180 after surgery were recorded in 47.6 % and 37.4 % of cases, respectively. The EI showed good sensitivity for mortality at day 180 (reference cohort: 85 %, validation center 1: 100 %, validation center 2: 50 %) and for ADL impairment at day 180 (reference cohort 75.4 %, validation center 1 72.3 %, validation center 2 83.3 %). ConclusionElderly patients with a poor performance status have a high risk of persistent functional deterioration. Data from this multicenter external validation trial confirms the EI as an accurate and reliable tool to identify patients with high risk of mortality or persistent postoperative functional impairment.

Systemic inflammation in midlife is associated with late-life functional limitations

Systemic inflammation generally coexists with functional limitations that seriously affect quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the association between systemic inflammation in midlife and the risk of functional limitations in late-life. A total of 10,044 participants with an average age of 53.9 ± 5.7 years at baseline were included in a cohort study. At the last follow-up, the prevalence of impaired activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and lower extremity function (LEF) was 14.7%, 21.6%, and 50.3%, respectively. The values of four inflammatory biomarkers were used to calculate the inflammation composite score. Compared with the participants in the lowest quartile of the inflammation composite score (Q1), those in the highest quartile (Q4) exhibited an odds ratio (OR) of 1.589 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.335–1.892 for impaired ADLs, an OR of 1.426 and a 95% CI of 1.228–1.657 for impaired IADLs, and an OR of 1.728 and a 95% CI of 1.526–1.957 for impaired LEF. The association between systemic inflammation and functional limitations was partly mediated by cardiac and brain function. The present study provides evidence that systemic inflammation in midlife is associated with a higher risk of late-life functional limitations. Protecting vital organ functions in midlife may have a positive impact on reducing the risk of future functional limitations.Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00005131.

Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.

Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear. The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET). Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore. TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior. TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.

Predicting Outcomes in Frail Older Community-Dwellers in Western Australia: Results from the Community Assessment of Risk Screening and Treatment Strategies (CARTS) Programme.

Understanding risk factors for frailty, functional decline and incidence of adverse healthcare outcomes amongst community-dwelling older adults is important to plan population-level health and social care services. We examined variables associated with one-year risk of institutionalisation, hospitalisation and death among patients assessed in their own home by a community-based Aged Care Assessment Team (ACAT) in Western Australia. Frailty and risk were measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC), respectively. Predictive accuracy was measured from the area under the curve (AUC). Data from 417 patients, median 82 ± 10 years, were included. At 12-month follow-up, 22.5% (n = 94) were institutionalised, 44.6% (n = 186) were hospitalised at least once and 9.8% (n = 41) had died. Frailty was common, median CFS score 6/9 ± 1, and significantly associated with institutionalisation (p = 0.001), hospitalisation (p = 0.007) and death (p < 0.001). Impaired activities of daily living (ADL) measured on the RISC had moderate correlation with admission to long-term care (r = 0.51) and significantly predicted institutionalisation (p < 0.001) and death (p = 0.01). The RISC had the highest accuracy for institutionalisation (AUC 0.76). The CFS and RISC had fair to good accuracy for mortality (AUC of 0.69 and 0.74, respectively), but neither accurately predicted hospitalisation. Home assessment of community-dwelling older patients by an ACAT in Western Australia revealed high levels of frailty, ADL impairment and incident adverse outcomes, suggesting that anticipatory care planning is imperative for these patients.

Associations of body mass index, waist circumference and the weight-adjusted waist index with daily living ability impairment in older Chinese people: A cross-sectional study of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.

To investigate the associations of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) with the impairment of activities of daily living (ADL) in older Chinese people. A total of 13 260 participants aged 65 years and older from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey were included in this cross-sectional study. BMI, WC and the WWI were calculated from measurements of height, weight and WC. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Non-linear correlations were investigated using restricted cubic spline curves. In multivariate logistic regression fully adjusted for confounding variables, our analyses revealed significant associations between WC and WWI and ADL impairment, with adjusted ORs (95% CI) of 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) and 1.08 (1.03, 1.12), respectively. Meanwhile, participants with a high WWI had a higher risk of ADL impairment compared with those with a low WWI, with an adjusted OR (95% CI) of 1.12 (1.02, 1.23). Subgroup analyses showed that only the association between WWI and ADL impairment did not differ in any of the different populations. In addition, we found that BMI, WC and WWI were non-linearly associated with ADL impairment. There are significant associations between WC and WWI and ADL impairment in older Chinese people. The findings show the ability of the WWI to serve as a comprehensive and effective indicator of obesity in older Chinese people and emphasize the importance of assessing WWI in screening and preventing ADL impairment in older people.

Plasma levels of adipokines and insulin are associated with markers of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in the spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease

The discovery that metabolic alterations often coexist with neurodegenerative conditions has sparked interest in the examination of metabolic regulatory factors as potential modulators of brain health. Here, we examined the role of adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, resistin, and IL6) and insulin on different markers of brain atrophy in participants on the spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease. We included 566 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset with 1063 follow-up time points (average follow-up: one year); and examined the association between metabolic regulatory factors and volumetric MRI values, white matter hyperintensities, and measures of cognitive impairment. Higher leptin, resistin, IL6, and insulin were associated with markers of cerebral atrophy, such as lower total brain volume, or higher ventricular volume. Higher leptin and resistin were also associated with greater impairment in daily life activities. Higher adiponectin was associated with lower ventricle volume. There was no association between adipokines or insulin with white matter hyperintensities. Our findings indicate a co-occurrence between alterations in metabolic regulatory factors and in brain volume along the preclinical to clinical spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease. These results suggest that strategies aimed at promoting metabolic health may positively impact brain health.

A Multidimensional, Person-Centered Framework for Functional Assessment in Dementia: Insights from the 'What', 'How', 'To Whom', and 'How Much' Questions.

Dementia is a syndrome characterized by cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with progressive functional decline (FD). FD is a core diagnostic criterion for dementia, setting the threshold between its prodromal stages and the full-blown disease. The operationalization of FD continues to generate a great deal of controversy. For instance, the threshold of FD for the diagnosis of dementia varies across diagnostic criteria, supporting the need for standardization of this construct. Moreover, there is a need to reconsider how we are measuring FD to set boundaries between normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. In this paper, we propose a multidimensional framework that addresses outstanding issues in the assessment of FD: i) What activities of daily living (ADLs) are necessary to sustain an independent living in aging? ii) How to assess FD in individuals with suspected neurocognitive disorders? iii) To whom is the assessment directed? and iv) How much does FD differentiate healthy aging from mild and major neurocognitive disorders? Importantly, the To Whom Question introduces a person-centered approach that regards patients and caregivers as active agents in the assessment process of FD. Thus, once impaired ADLs have been identified, patients can indicate how significant such impairments are for them in daily life. We envisage that this new framework will guide future strategies to enhance functional assessment and treatment of patients with dementia and their caregivers.

Activity daily living and some related factors among older patients with osteoporosis

: To assess activities in daily living and some related factors among older people with osteoporosis examined and treated at National Geriatric Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional study on 141 older patients with osteoporosis examined and treated at National Geriatric Hospital from June to October 2022. Activities in daily living were assessed using Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrument Activities of Daily Living (IADL). General information, characteristics of osteoporosis, and geriatric syndromes were collected. Results: Of the total 141 participants, the proportion of participants with functional impairment in ADLs and IADLs was the same, accounting for 34.8%. There were significant associations between impaired ADL and group aged ≥ 80 with OR=4.5; BMI &lt;18.5 (kg/m2) with OR=9.7; those who had diabetes with OR=2.9. There were significant associations between impaired ADL and geriatric syndromes: frailty syndromes (OR=20.8), low levels of physical activity (OR=10.8), cognitive impairment (OR=6.4), malnutrition (OR=4.5), risk of falls (OR=4.5), depression (OR=4.4), sleep disturbances (OR=2.9) and polypharmacy (OR=2.6). There was no statistically significant difference in the decline in daily functioning and some characteristics of osteoporosis. Conclusion: One in three elderly osteoporosis patients has impaired ADL or IADL. Our results highlighted that advanced age, BMI, diabetes, and geriatric syndrome were significantly associated with ADL in older patients with osteoporosis.

Evaluation of a novel method to guide belantamab mafodotin dosing in multiple myeloma based on a patient-reported questionnaire.

7530 Background: Ocular adverse events (OAEs, best corrected visual acuity [BCVA] change from baseline and keratopathy) are common with belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; GSK2857916) and often necessitate an ophthalmic exam to guide dosing. Herein, we evaluate a novel approach for belamaf dose modifications in transplant ineligible patients (pts) with newly diagnosed MM, treated with an extended schedule of belamaf with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in the BelaRd study. Methods: BelaRd (NCT04808037) is an ongoing, phase 1/2 study of 2 Parts. Part 1 established the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 1.9 mg/kg q8w, extended to q12w to account for OAEs. Part 2 assesses the safety/efficacy of RP2D in Groups A and B, of 15 pts each, and evaluates two sets of guidelines for OAE management. In Group A, dosing is determined by an ophthalmic exam performed by a certified ophthalmologist; in Group B it is determined by the pts’ responses in the Vision Related Anamnestic (VRA) tool and the presence of ≥Grade (Gr) 3 OAEs. VRA is a patient-reported questionnaire capturing ocular symptoms and their impact on activities of daily living (ADL). Herein, we present the OAEs and preliminary efficacy results after 205 ophthalmic and VRA assessments for all Part 2 pts (cut-off date 05/10/2023). Results: By the cut-off date, the median belamaf administrations and number of cycles reached were 3.0/3.0 and 8.0/7.0 for Groups A and B, respectively. The respective rates of Gr2 and ≥Gr3 BCVA change from baseline were 34.6%/24.2% and 6.4%/0.0%, while a meaningful BCVA decline (Snellen score &lt;20/50) and ≥3 lines drop in the better-seeing eye was recorded in 11.0%/7.2% ophthalmological assessments; no ≥Gr3 keratopathy was observed. Among 110/94 VRA assessments, ocular symptoms and ADL impairment, manifesting for ≥50% of the time in the last 24 hours prior to belamaf administration (substantial time), were noted in 6.4%/10.6% and 3.6%/7.4%. Of note, VRA captured a “substantial time” response in 86% of assessments with ≥Gr3 OAEs. Finally, for the response-evaluable pts, at a median follow-up of 7.7 months, ORR was 93.3%/85.7% in Groups A and B (PR/VGPR/CR: 26.7%/53.3%/13.3%; 21.4%/64.3%/0.0%) and the median time to first response was ~ 1 month. Conclusions: The VRA tool was safe and effective in informing belamaf dose modifications. Future analyses will determine if VRA may effectively eliminate the need for an ophthalmic exam prior to belamaf dosing. Clinical trial information: NCT04808037 . [Table: see text]

Evaluation of Changes in Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life of Patients with Bone Metastasis Who Underwent Conservative Therapy through Bone Metastasis Cancer Boards.

Background and Objectives: Changes in activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL) of patients with bone metastasis who underwent surgical treatment through Bone Metastasis Cancer Boards (BMCBs), a recent multidisciplinary approach for managing bone metastases, have been reported; however, no reports exist on patients who undergo conservative treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate these patients' ADL and QOL and examine the factors influencing changes in these parameters. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 200 patients with bone metastases who underwent conservative therapy through BMCBs between 2013 and 2021. A reassessment was conducted within 2-8 weeks after the initial assessment. Patients' background and changes in performance status (PS), Barthel Index (BI), EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) scores, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were initially assessed. Furthermore, we categorized patients into two groups based on improvements or deteriorations in ADL and QOL and performed comparative analyses. Results: Significant improvements in EQ-5D (0.57 ± 0.02 versus [vs.] 0.64 ± 0.02), NRS max (5.21 ± 0.24 vs. 3.56 ± 0.21), and NRS average (2.98 ± 0.18 vs. 1.85 ± 0.13) scores were observed between the initial assessment and reassessment (all p < 0.001). PS (1.84 ± 0.08 vs. 1.72 ± 0.08) and BI (83.15 ± 1.68 vs. 84.42 ± 1.73) also showed improvements (p = 0.06, and 0.054, respectively). In addition, spinal cord paralysis (odds ratio [OR]: 3.69, p = 0.049; OR: 8.42, p < 0.001), chemotherapy (OR: 0.43, p = 0.02; OR: 0.25, p = 0.007), and NRS average scores (OR: 0.38, p = 0.02; OR: 0.14, p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with ADL and QOL. Conclusions: Patients with bone metastases who underwent conservative treatment through BMCBs exhibited an increase in QOL without a decline in ADL. The presence of spinal cord paralysis, absence of chemotherapy, and poor pain control were associated with a higher risk of deterioration in ADL and QOL.

Impact of Pain on Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA).

Pain, particularly musculoskeletal (MSK) and multi-site pain, significantly impacts activities of daily living (ADL) in the elderly, leading to a decline in overall quality of life (QoL). This study, comprising 7490 participants, (mean age: 69 ± 10; females: 57%) from the sixth wave of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA), aimed to assess the association between self-reported pain and ADL impairment among the elderly population. Notably, 62% of participants reported experiencing pain, with back pain being the most prevalent (36%) and stomachache the least (0.39%). A majority (61%) of individuals reported MSK-related pain. Additionally, 20% reported pain at one site and 0.03% experienced pain at 12 sites. ADL impairment was observed in 376 (5.0%) participants. Compared to those without pain, participants reporting moderate and severe pain had higher odds of ADL impairment [2.31 (95% CI, 1.66-3.21) and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.95-4.53), respectively]. Pain experienced in the shoulder, arm, wrist, back, hip, leg, and ankle had a significant association with ADL impairment, with ORs ranging from 2.66 (95% CI, 1.80-3.93; hip pain) to 1.36 (95% CI 1.07-1.72; back pain). Furthermore, multi-site pain was associated with higher ADL impairment [1-6 sites: OR: 1.49 (95% CI, 1.11-2.01); 7-12 sites: OR: 7.16 (95% CI, 3.60-14.26)]. These findings underscore the importance of addressing MSK and multi-site pain through targeted interventions, potentially enhancing ADL and contributing to an improved QoL among the elderly population.

DASC-21 score and the risk of in-hospital death in elderly patients with heart failure.

We investigated whether the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System-21 Items (DASC-21), a questionnaire that assesses cognitive function, including activities of daily living (ADL), was predictive of in-hospital death and prolonged hospital stay in elderly patients hospitalized for heart failure. We retrospectively assessed the DASC-21 score at the time of admission, in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and change in the Barthel index in 399 patients hospitalized for heart failure between 2016 and 2019. The mean patient age was 85.8 ± 7.7 years (61.3% women). The median DASC-21 score was 38 (64.7% higher than 31). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, a higher DASC-21 score was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR] = 1.045 per 1 point increase, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.010-1.081, P = 0.012), even after adjusting for confounding factors, including atrial fibrillation, ejection fraction, and B-type natriuretic peptide. Difficulties (3 or 4) with the self-management of medication in instrumental ADL inside the home (OR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.05-10.28, P = 0.042), toileting (OR = 3.66, 95% CI: 1.19-11.29, P = 0.024), grooming (OR = 6.47, 95% CI: 2.00-20.96, P = 0.002), eating (OR = 7.96, 95% CI: 2.49-25.45, P < 0.001), and mobility in physical ADL (OR = 5.99, 95% CI: 1.85-19.35, P = 0.003) were identified as risk factors for in-hospital death. Patients in the highest tertile of the DASC-21 score had a significantly longer hospital stay (P = 0.006) and a greater reduction in the Barthel index (P < 0.001). In elderly patients hospitalized for heart failure, higher DASC-21 scores were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death, prolonged hospital stay, and impaired ADL. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 546-553.

Associations Among Tremor Amplitude, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life in Patients with Essential Tremor.

Essential tremor (ET) is a disabling syndrome consisting of tremor, primarily in the upper limbs. We assessed the correlation of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) Performance Item 4 ratings of upper limb tremor with the TETRAS activities of daily living (ADL) subscale and with 2 quality of life (QoL) scales. This noninterventional, cross-sectional, point-in-time survey of neurologists(n = 60), primary care physicians (n = 38), and their patients with ET (n = 1,003) used real-world data collected through the Adelphi ET Disease Specific Programme™. Physician-reported measures (TETRAS Performance Item 4 and TETRAS ADL total) and patient-reported QoL measures (generic EuroQol-5 Dimension 5 Level [EQ-5D-5 L] and ET-specific Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST)) were assessed with bivariate and multivariable analyses. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted. The bivariate association between TETRAS Performance Item 4 score and TETRAS ADL total score was high (Pearson r = 0.761, P < 0.001). The bivariate associations between TETRAS Performance Item 4 score and EQ-5D-5 L index score (r = -0.410, P < 0.001) and between TETRAS ADL total score and EQ-5D-5 L index score (r = -0.543, P < 0.001) were moderate. The bivariate associations between TETRAS Performance Item 4 score and QUEST total score (r = 0.457, P < 0.001), and between TETRAS ADL total score and QUEST total score (r = 0.630, P < 0.001) were also moderate. These associations were unaltered by the inclusion of covariates. This study showed that greater tremor severity (TETRAS Performance Item 4) was positively correlated with ADL impairment (TETRAS ADL) and negatively associated with QoL (EQ-5D-5 L and QUEST). TETRAS Performance Item 4 score is a robust predictor of TETRAS ADL total score, and TETRAS Performance Item 4 and TETRAS ADL total scores were robust predictors of the 2 QoL scales. The results demonstrate the value of TETRAS scores as valid endpoints for future clinical trials. This real-world study assessed TETRAS scores as predictors of impaired QoL in ET. TETRAS Performance Item 4 and ADL were associated with EQ-5D-5 L and QUEST. TETRAS scores may serve as valid endpoints for future clinical trials.