Impaction Bone Grafting Research Articles

Abdominal Pain Caused by Bilateral Acetabular Fractures Secondary to an Epileptic Seizure Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: Epileptic patients have increased risk of fractures. This is related to the traumatic event itself and to concomitant factors. Clear fracture related complaints are not always present at primary survey of these patients. This indicates a thorough primary evaluation of the complete individual post-seizure. We present a unique case of abdominal pain due to bilateral acetabular fracture after an epileptic seizure. Case Report: A 66-year old patient, who chose to live solitary and was in suboptimal hygienic condition, was admitted to the neurological department after two epileptic seizures. Three days after admission, an abdominal radiograph revealed bilateral acetabular and pubic fractures as chance findings. Treatment was challenging due to patient and fracture specific conditions. Conservative treatment options were limited and eventually failed. Eventually, bilateral total hip prosthesis with bone impaction grafting were performed. At one-year follow up, no restriction in active daily living was noted. Conclusion: Seizure induced bilaterally acetabular fractures are very rare. Thorough physical examination after an epileptic seizure is imperative to identify fractures. Abdominal pain can be the only symptom of a fractured acetabulum. Treatment options are dependent of patient’s morbidity, bone quality and surgeon’s preference. Primary total hip arthroplasty might be indicated and can offer good results even in case of bilateral acetabular fractures.

A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup

BackgroundTreatment of acetabular bone loss with impaction bone grafting (IBG) at revision total hip arthroplasty is highly dependent on mechanical stability and graft compression for clinical success. Here, we describe a new technique to further compress and stabilize the acetabular graft bed with a thin, perforated titanium shell. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 170 cases of acetabular revision arthroplasty 7 years (standard deviation 2.8) after IBG combined with a graft-compressing titanium shell implant. The patients were reviewed by clinical score and radiography. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The medical journals of the 33 deceased cases were reviewed for any reoperation. Of the 170 cases, 74 had a cavitary acetabular bone defect, 93 had combined segmental and cavitary bone defects, and 3 had a pelvic dissociation. Bone graft incorporation was assessed and correction of the hip center of rotation was calculated. ResultsFive cases (3%) were reoperated for mechanical loosening. One more was assessed as loose but asymptomatic and was not planned for revision. There were 3 reoperations for recurrent dislocation, 2 for deep infection and 1 for technical error. Reoperation for any reason, as the end point of survivorship, showed a survival rate of 92% after 10 years. Hip score according to Merle, d'Aubigne, and Postel increased from 10.8 (preoperatively) to 16.4 at follow-up. The clinical and radiological results were excellent. ConclusionIBG combined with the compressing shell results in excellent results for this challenging condition.

Acetabular Reconstructions with Impaction Bone-Grafting and a Cemented Cup in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: A Concise Follow-up, at 27 to 35 Years, of a Previous Report.

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Decreased migration with locally administered bisphosphonate in cemented cup revisions using impaction bone grafting technique

Background and purpose — Impaction bone grafting (IBG) in revision hip surgery is an established method in restoring bone stock deficiencies. We hypothesized that local treatment of the morsellized allograft with a bisphosphonate in cemented revision would, in addition to increased bone density, also reduce the early migration of the cup as measured by radiostereometry (RSA).Patients and methods — 20 patients with aseptic cup loosening underwent revision using the IBG technique. The patients were randomized to either clodronate (10 patients) or saline (10 patients, control group) as local adjunct to the morsellized bone. The outcome was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during the first year regarding periacetabular bone density and with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for the first 2 years regarding cup migration.Results — 2 patients were lost to follow-up: 9 patients remained in the clodronate and 9 in the control group. Less proximal migration was found in the clodronate group compared with the controls, measured both over time (mixed-models analysis, p = 0.02) as well as at the specified time points up to 2 years (0.22 mm and 0.59 mm respectively, p = 0.02). Both groups seemed to have stabilized at 1 year. We found similar bone mineral density measured by DXA, and similar RSA migration in the other directions. No cups were re-revised.Interpretation — Local treatment of the allograft bone with clodronate reduced early proximal migration of the revised cup but without any measurable difference in periacetabular bone density.

The Influence of Liquids on the Mechanical Properties of Allografts in Bone Impaction Grafting.

Allografts are used to compensate for bone defects resulting from revision surgery, tumor surgery, and reconstructive bone surgery. Although it is well known that the reduction of fat content of allografts increases mechanical properties, the content of liquids with a known grain size distribution has not been assessed so far. The aim of the study was to compare the mechanical properties of dried allografts (DA) with allografts mixed with a saline solution (ASS) and with allografts mixed with blood (AB) having a similar grain size distribution. Fresh-frozen morselized bone chips were cleaned chemically, sieved, and reassembled in specific portions with a known grain size distribution. A uniaxial compression was used to assess the yield limit, initial density, density at yield limit, and flowability of the three groups before and after compaction with a fall hammer apparatus. No statistically significant difference could be found for the yield limit between DA and ASS (p = 0.339) and between ASS and AB (p = 0.554). DA showed a statistically significant higher yield limit than AB (p = 0.022). Excluding the effect of the grain size distribution on the mechanical properties, it was shown that allografts have a lower yield limit when lipids are present. The liquid content of allografts seems to play an inferior role as no statistically significant difference could be found between DA and ASS. It is suggested, in accordance with other studies, to chemically clean allografts before implantation to reduce the contamination risk and the fat content.

Impaction bone grafting with reinforcement metallic mesh and cemented cup for the treatment of Paprosky 3B acetabular defects

Depending on the bone defect, cup revision can be a highly complex operation. Cup loosening, produces cup migration and acetabular bone defects and the size of these bone defects will determine the technique used for acetabular cup revision. Migration of the cup also requires that to obtain a good clinical result, the center of rotation of the hip be reconstructed so the cup is played in the anatomic rotation center of the hip. The acetabular bone stock must be ideal to support the cup. There must be enough medial bone stock and supportive rims to obtain a long-term result.

One stage revision single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with impacted morselized bone graft following a failed double-bundle reconstruction.

Although double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has theoretical benefits such as more accurate reproduction of ACL anatomy, it is technically more demanding surgery. This report describes the case of a one stage revision single-bundle ACL reconstruction after primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction. A professional dancer had an ACL previously reconstructed with a double-bundle technique, but the femoral tunnels were malpositioned resulting in residual laxity and rotational instability. The previous femoral tunnel positions were vertical and widened. The previous vertical tunnels were filled with impacted bone graft and a revision single-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed via the new femoral tunnel with a 2 O’clock position between the previous two tunnels. After 10 months of postoperative rehabilitation, the patient returned to professional dancing with sound bony union and without any residual instability.

A 3- to 18-Year Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Impacted Bone Allografts and Cemented Lubinus SP II Stem. Clinical, Radiographic, and Survivorship Analysis With Comparison to the Literature

BackgroundWe present the first medium- to long-term follow-up of revision total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting (IBG) combined with the matte and collared Lubinus SP II stem for cases of severe osteolysis and stem loosening. MethodsSixty-nine femoral revisions were identified for 67 patients consecutively operated with revision femoral arthroplasty using IBG and a cemented Lubinus SP II stem. The mean age was 69 years (standard deviation, 9.9). We retrospectively analyzed 68 cases (1 was lost to follow-up). At the time of the revision surgery, all had substantial femoral bone loss. Fifteen of the revisions were performed due to deep infection. The patients were analyzed by clinical score and radiography. ResultsAt follow-up, 4 femoral components (6%) had been rerevised or assessed as failure. Of these 4, 3 were assessed as mechanical failure, and 1 for dislocation; none was for infection. Three cups (4%) had been revised for dislocation; 1 of these also had a stem exchange. Three cases (4%) had been reoperated for a periprosthetic fracture in distal femur without stem exchange. Radiologic results were excellent and the clinical Merle d'Aubignè-Postel score had improved from a mean of 12.2 preoperatively to 17.5 at follow-up. ConclusionIBG combined with the Lubinus SP II stem is safe and results in a low rate of periprosthetic fractures and dislocations. The medium- to long-term clinical result was excellent, with regeneration of living bone in the femur.

Long term results of impaction Bone grafting using a synthetic graft (Apapore) in revision hip surgery

IntroductionImpaction Bone grafting (IBG) in Revision THR is challenging and places demands on allograft stores. Identifying a potential synthetic replacement that works in the longer term was the aim of this study. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 21 sequential patients who had undergone revision THR using IBG. They were randomised to receive either combined allograft and synthetic graft or Allograft alone. Among the surviving 15 patients, there were total of 25 procedures were carried out. 15 hips underwent IBG in the acetabulum and 10 hips underwent femoral IBG. Eight patients received a 50/50 mixture of allograft and synthetic Bone graft (Apapore) and seven allograft alone. Bone loss was classified using Paprosky classification. The average follow up was 10 years. ResultsOf the 21 patients, 6 had died of unrelated causes and were excluded. There were 3 re-operations but no revision of the original components. There was no significant implant migration detected. 3 acetabular components had confluent lucent lines in zone-1 which remained stable on long term follow up. 2 patients sustained femoral peri-prosthetic fractures after a simple fall and one patient who developed deep infection treated by DAIR. The modified oxford hip score post-operatively was 18 in allograft group and 22 in Apapore group ConclusionLong-term results indicate that the combined use of synthetic graft in Impaction Bone grafting is an effective substitute

Impaction Grafting Made Easy

BackgroundImpaction bone grafting is an established reconstruction technique to address bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. Intuitively, it would seem to be a very attractive method as “missing bone is replaced with bone.” The potential restoration of bone stock is of particular value in the younger patient who may be facing future revision procedures. Methods and ResultsAlthough undoubtedly some units have published good results with this method, more recent long-term data have revealed some of the limitations of this reconstruction technique. The aim of this review is to highlight these most recent data on impaction bone grafting and provide the author's opinion on the current role for this technique, as well as reviewing some technical considerations. ConclusionImpaction bone grafting remains an important technique in the armamentarium of the revision hip surgeon. More recent long-term data have allowed refinement of the indications and on the acetabular side, and it should be used with caution in association with severe bone defects.

Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.

INTRODUCTION Acetabular impaction bone grafting with a cemented polyethylene socket aims to reconstitute the bone stock in hip revision. This is an effective but resource intensive and time consuming technique. Usually, the articular cartilage is removed from the femoral head allograft. Our objective was to assess the late results of using the whole femoral head, retaining the cartilage. METHODS Forty-two acetabular revisions using impacted morselised bone graft (retaining the articular cartilage) and a cemented socket were studied retrospectively. The mean follow-up duration was 9.3 years (range: 6-13 years). Clinical and radiological assessment was made using the Oxford hip score, the classification of Hodgkinson et al (1988) for socket loosening and the classification of Gie et al (1993) for evaluation of allograft incorporation. RESULTS Twenty-seven sockets (75.0%) were radiologically stable, six (16.7%) were radiologically loose and three (8.3%) had migrated. Thirty cases (83.3%) showed good trabecular remodelling and six (16.74%) showed trabecular incorporation without remodelling. Six patients were lost to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis calculated a survival rate of 94.5% at a mean of 9.3 years (95% confidence interval: 8.1-10.4 years) for all reasons of failure, with two re-revisions. CONCLUSIONS The nine-year results of the aforementioned technique are comparable with other major studies. Particularly when the supply of allograft and operative time are limited, retaining the articular cartilage of the femoral head is a safe and successful alternative.

Clinical reports of surgical dislocation of the hip with sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft for grade IIIA-IIIB aseptic necrosis of femoral head (ANFH) patients.

ObjectiveTo analyze the treatment effect of surgical dislocation of the hip with sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft in grade IIIA-IIIB aseptic necrosis of femoral head (ANFH) patients.MethodsFrom June 2012 to December 2014, 6 patients (total 8 hips) with grade IIIA-IIIB ANFH were retrospectively followed. All the patients were operated with surgical dislocation of the hip with sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft. Collapse of the femoral head, healing of the osteotomy, along with Harris hip scores were observed after surgeries.ResultsAll the patients were followed up, the osteotomies were all healed. Only 1 of the 8 hips (12.5%) was collapsed by the last follow-up. Harris hip scores were improved from 54.52 ± 8.16 to 80.53 ± 7.62 (P <0.001). The excellent rate was 87.5%.ConclusionFor grade IIIA-IIIB ANFH patients, surgical dislocation with sequestrum clearance and impacting bone graft could possibly achieve satisfactory clinical benefit, particularly for the young patients.

Past decade on hip-preserving surgery for osteonecrosis of femoral head treatment in China

As a common disease in orthopedics, osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) frequently occurs among young and middle-aged people. Hip joint preserving surgery has attracted more and more attention due to the fact that artificial joint prosthesis has a certain useful life and the rate of hip joint revision is high and the higher risk of many complications. There are a large number of operative methods for preserving hip joint in clinical practice without definitive curative effects. Core decompression and impaction bone grafting with simple operative methods can relieve internal pressure of femoral head and pain symptoms, but they cannot remove necrotic bone completely. Hence, they are only used for ONFH in the early stage. Vascularized bone transplantation can fill defects of the former, as it can not only completely remove necrotic bone, but also provide bone graft with nourishing vessels for femoral head, being beneficial to reconstruct the bone structure of femoral head. Subsequently, the application of tantalum rod can provide mechanical support for femoral head to prevent the collapse of femoral head. The emergence of stem cell transplantation has created a new approach to preserve hip joint for ONFH, which promotes the regeneration of bone cells and assists femoral head in repair, often combined with other operative methods and using characteristics of superior proliferation and differentiation of stem cells. Hip joint preserving surgery, in recent years, has been performed increasingly, and has obtained improvement in clinical effects. The multiple combination of a variety of its operative methods provides more effective treatments for ONFH. It is an essential notion that hip joint preserving surgery, however with any operative method, should as far as possible select a surgical plan with little trauma, simple methods and little injury to bone structure of hip joint based on ensuring the efficacy.

Survivorship Analysis of Eighty Revised Hip Arthroplasties With the Impaction Grafting Technique Using Whole Femoral Head Allografts With the Articular Cartilage

BackgroundAcetabular impaction bone grafting aims to restore anatomy in hip revision surgery. This is an effective but expensive and time-consuming technique. Usually, the articular cartilage is removed from the femoral head allograft. We aimed to reproduce the same results retaining the cartilage of the allograft. MethodsEighty acetabular revisions using impacted morselized bone graft retaining the articular cartilage and a cemented cup were studied retrospectively. Six were lost during follow-up. The mean follow-up was 6.5 years (range 1-13). Clinical and radiological assessment was made using the Oxford Hip Score, Hodgkinson's criteria for socket loosening, and the Gie classification for evaluation of allograft incorporation. ResultsSixty-three sockets (85.1%) were considered radiologically stable (type 0, 1, and 2 demarcations), 8 (10.8%) were radiologically loose (type 3), and 3 (4.1%) presented with migration. Fifty-one (68.9%) cases showed good trabecular remodeling (grade 3), 20 (27%) showed trabecular incorporation (grade 2), and 3 (4.1%) showed poor allograft incorporation. Mean preoperative hip score was 43 and postoperative score was 28. Six (8.1%) cases presented heterotopic ossification around the revised implants, 2 patients (2.7%) had periprosthetic fractures, and 4 (5.4%) had dislocations. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship at a mean of 6.5 years with revision of the cup for any reason was 95.9% (95% confidence interval 5.6-7.5). ConclusionThe mid-term results of our technique are promising. Particularly when the supply of fresh-frozen allografts and surgical time is limited, using whole femoral head with articular cartilage is both safe and effective.

Biological downsizing : Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty

Periacetabular bony defects remain agreat challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty. After assessment and classification of the defect and selection of asuitable implant the primary stable fixation and sufficient biological reconstitution of asustainable bone stock are essential for long term success in acetabular revision surgery. Biological defect reconstruction aims for the down-sizing of periacetabular defects for later revision surgeries. In the field of biological augmentation several methods are currently available. Autologous transplants feature aprofound osseointegrative capacity. However, limitations such as volume restrictions and secondary complications at the donor site have to be considered. Structural allografts show little weight bearing potential in the long term and high failure rates. In clinical practice, the usage of spongious chips implanted via impaction bone grafting technique in combination with antiprotrusio cages for the management of contained defects have shown promising long time results. Nevertheless, when dealing with craniolateral acetabular and dorsal column defects, the additional implantation of macroporous metal implants or augments should be considered since biological augmentation has shown little clinical success in these particular cases. This article provides an overview of the current clinically available biological augmentation methods of peri-acetabular defects. Due to the limitations of autologous and allogeneic bone transplants in terms of size and availability, the emerging field of innovative implantable tissue engineering constructs gains interest and will also be discussed in this article.

Topical bisphosphonate augments fixation of bone-grafted hydroxyapatite coated implants, BMP-2 causes resorption-based decrease in bone

Bone allograft is used in total joint arthroplasties in order to enhance implant fixation. BMPs are known to stimulate new bone formation within allograft, but also known to accelerate graft resorption. Bisphosphonates are strong inhibitor of bone resorption. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the bisphosphonate zoledronate was able to counteract the accelerated graft resorption without interfering with the BMP induced bone formation. In the present study the two drugs alone and in combination were studied in our canine model of impaction bone grafting. We included 10 dogs in this study. Cancellous allograft bone grafts were soaked in either saline or zoledronate solution (0.005mg/mL) and then vehicle or BMP2 (0.15mg rhBMP2) was added. This produced four treatment groups: A) control, B) BMP2, C) zoledronate and D) BMP2+zoledronate. The allograft treated with A, B, C or D was impacted into a circumferential defect of 2.5mm around HA-coated porous Ti implants. Each dog received all four treatment groups with two implants in the distal part of each femur. The group with allograft soaked in zoledronate (C) showed better biomechanical fixation than all other groups (p<0.05). It had less allograft resorption compared to all other groups (p<0.005) without any statistically significant change in new bone formation. The addition of BMP2 to the allograft did not increase new bone formation significantly, but did accelerate allograft resorption. This was also the case where the allograft was treated with BMP2 and zoledronate in combination (D). This caused a decrease in mechanical implant fixation in both these groups compared to the control group, however only statistically significant for the BMP2 group compared to control. The study shows that topical zoledronate can be a valuable tool for augmenting bone grafts when administered optimally. The use of BMP2 in bone grafting procedures seems associated with a high risk of bone resorption and mechanical weakening.

Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.

Femoral impaction bone allografting in revision hip arthroplasty facilitates physiological reconstruction with restoration of bone stock, allowing implantation of a standard cemented femoral component. The purpose of this study was to report our experience in femoral component revision arthroplasty with impaction morsellised cancellous bone allograft using custom impactors and a cemented triple-taper polished stem. Retrospective analysis of all cases of femoral component revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting undertaken by a single surgeon from 2005 to 2011. Outcome measures included radiographic analysis of stem subsidence over time, graft remodelling and incorporation, and clinical progress. We reviewed 47 consecutive hips in 44 patients, mean age 62 years (37-88). Femoral impaction with allograft was performed as either single stage (41 cases) or 2-stage (6 cases) procedures. All patients received a cemented C-stem prosthesis. The mean follow-up period was 5.1 (1.3-9.4) years. The median preoperative bone defect score was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-3) using the Endo-Klinik classification. Radiological evidence of graft incorporation was observed in 89% (281 of 315 zones) with additional remodelling observed in 33% (103 of 315 zones). The median stem subsidence at 1-year follow-up was 1.1 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.24 mm, range 0-6 mm). The median Oxford Hip Score at the most recent follow-up was 36.5. To date no femoral component has undergone further revision. Encouraging results have been obtained with this technique for the treatment of significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty, allowing implantation of a standard prosthesis.

Acetabular Reconstruction with Massive Allograft Shaped to the Cavity and Kerboull-Type Acetabular Reinforcement Device for Multiple Failures of Impaction Bone Graft: A Case Report

Acetabular component revision in the presence of severe bone loss is difficult for reconstructing an acetabular component in the anatomical hip center. Various treatment options are available, although often the acetabular defect cannot be corrected with a single option alone. Precise assessment of the bone loss and a suitable combination of methods are needed. Here we report a case of multiple failures with impaction bone grafting reconstruction for an acetabular bone defect of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons classification type III. We finally reconstructed the acetabulum with three femoral head allografts and a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device. The allograft was a casted, jet-type helmet-like shape. A year later the patient was able to walk without a cane and perform light agricultural work. Accurate evaluation of the acetabular bone loss and appropriate reconstruction is important.

Reconstruction of non-contained acetabular defects with impaction grafting, a reinforcement mesh and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component

This review summarises the technique of impaction grafting with mesh augmentation for the treatment of uncontained acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. The ideal acetabular revision should restore bone stock, use a small socket in the near-anatomic position, and provide durable fixation. Impaction bone grafting, which has been in use for over 40 years, offers the ability to achieve these goals in uncontained defects. The precepts of modern, revision impaction grafting are that the segmental or cavitary defects must be supported with a mesh; the contained cavity is filled with vigorously impacted morselised fresh-frozen allograft; and finally, acrylic cement is used to stabilise the graft and provide rigid, long-lasting fixation of the revised acetabular component. Favourable results have been published with this technique. While having its limitations, it is a viable option to address large acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(1 Supple A):25-30.

Titanium wire mesh and impact bone allograft in treating acetabular bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty

Objective To investigate the method and efficacy in treating acetabular bone defects by the use of titanium wire mesh and impact bone allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods Twenty-two patients (22 hips) with acetabular bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty were treated with wire mesh and impact bone allograft from January 2008 to December 2013. There were 7 males and 15 females in the present study. The average age of the patients at the surgery was 64.8 (37-78) years. According to Paprosky classification, there were 9 cases of type IIA, 4 cases of IIB, 7 cases of IIC and 2 cases of IIIB. Twenty cases with aseptic loosen and 2 with periprosthetic infection were underwent revision surgery. Deep frozen cancellous bone allograft was sterilized and morselized to particles with the size of 7 to 10 mm. After removal of loosed acetabular component, the bone grafts were impacted into the acetabular defects area to restore the bone quantity. Titanium wire mesh with appropriate diameter was chosen to fix on impacted bone graft and fixed acetabulum with screws. Polyethylene cup was cemented in the mesh wire with proper position. Harris hip score system was used to evaluate the hip joint function. The AP pelvis X-ray was taken at 1 week, 3 months, 12 months and annually thereafter postoperatively to evaluate the rotation center, fusion of the bone graft and loosening of cup. Results All patients were followed up with the average period 5.1 years (3-7 years). The average Harris hip score before revision was 43.75±13.45, while the score was 85.33±7.84 at last follow-up (t=7.930, P=0.000). The average height of hip rotation center of surgical side was 3.49±0.77 cm before surgery, while its height at last follow-up was 2.22±0.22 cm (t=4.390, P=0.005). The distance between hip rotation center and the base of acetabulum was 3.54±0.45 cm before surgery, while its value was 3.52± 0.76 cm at last follow-up. All the bone grafts came to infusion with the average time 12 months (9-15 months). There was no case with cup migration more than 4 mm or rotation greater than 5° at last follow-up. One patient had the symptom of sciatic nerve injury. No case was with infection or dislocation. Conclusion In the treatment of acetabular bone defects, wire mesh and impact bone allograft with cemented cup in revision total hip arthroplasty can reconstruct hip rotation center and the acetabular bone quantity effectively. Satisfied early-midterm curative effects could be acquired by using this method. Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Reoperation; Acetabulum; Bone transplantation; Transplantation, homologous; Surgical mesh