Impact Of Oral Anticoagulants Research Articles

Exploring the Link between Anticoagulation, Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.

Background: The impact of oral anticoagulants (OACs) on cognitive impairment and dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is not well characterized. This systematic review aims to address this knowledge gap. Methods: SCOPUS and PubMed searches were conducted to identify articles in the English language investigating the association between the use of OACs and cognitive impairment and dementia. We excluded non-original research studies and studies that did not report data on cognitive impairment or included patients who underwent open heart surgery or had psychiatric illnesses or cancer. Results: Out of 22 studies (n = 606,404 patients), 13 studies (n = 597,744 patients) reported a reduction in cognitive impairment/dementia in those undergoing thromboprophylaxis. Using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with a lower incidence of cognitive impairment in 10 studies (n = 284,636 patients). One study found that patients undergoing dual therapy (n = 6794 patients) had a greater incidence of cognitive impairment compared to those undergoing monotherapy (n = 9994 patients). Three studies (n = 61,991 patients) showed that AF patients on DOACs had a lower likelihood of dementia diagnosis than those on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Dementia incidence was lower when VKAs were under good control. Conclusions: The use of oral anticoagulants has the potential to prevent cognitive impairment and dementia in patients with AF. Since most of the published research on this subject is observational in nature, more randomized controlled trials are needed to fully understand the effect of anticoagulants on cognitive function.

Impact of oral anticoagulants in frail atrial fibrillation patients: a report from an observational registry of european patients

Abstract Background The last years showed a substantial increase of interest about the clinical issue of frailty among patients with cardiovascular diseases. Impact of frailty in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been examined in terms of management, quality of life and increased risk of outcomes; nonetheless, the impact of treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC) remains suboptimally understood. Purpose To analyse the impact of OAC in a cohort of frail AF patients. Methods We used data from a European-wide prospective observational AF registry. Frailty was evaluated with a 40-items frailty index (FI) built according to the cumulative deficit method proposed by Rockwood and Mitnitski. OAC treatment was evaluated at baseline. A net clinical outcome (NCO) of all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and major bleeding, as well as the single components were the study outcomes. Results Among 10,172 patients available for this analysis, 2,171 (21.3%) were frail. AF frail patients had a mean (SD) age of 71.7 (9.8) years and were 1,073 (49.4%) females. Overall, 1,801 (83.0%) were treated with OAC, of which 1,232 (68.4%) prescribed with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and 569 (31.6%) prescribed with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Over a mean (SD) follow-up time of 1.56 (0.74) years there were 571 (26.3%) NCO events. Frail patients prescribed with OAC had a lower rate of NCO compared to those not prescribed (27.1% vs. 44.6%, p<0.001). After adjustments, use of OAC was associated with lower risk of NCO and all the other secondary outcomes (Table 1). Regarding the type of OAC, patients prescribed with NOACs reported a lower rate of NCO compared to those prescribed with VKAs (22.7% vs. 29.1%). After adjustments, use of NOACs was associated with a lower risk of NCO and all the other secondary outcomes, except for major bleeding (Table 1). When comparing patients with FI <80th percentile with those with FI ≥80th percentile, adjusted analysis showed that in the FI <80th group the use of OAC was consistently associated with lower risk of all outcomes (except for major bleeding), with a non-statistically significant trend seen in those with FI ≥80th percentile treated with OAC (Table 1). Conclusions In frail AF patients, use of OAC was associated with a lower risk of outcomes, as well as the use of NOACs compared with VKAs. In patients with a very high frailty burden the benefits of OAC may be attenuated.

Effects of oral anticoagulants on bone health (systematic literature review)

Background. Osteoporosis is actually today's problem, as it affects the quality and length of life, and increases the risk of fragility fractures, which leads to significant medical, social, and economic problems. One of the reasons for the development of secondary osteoporosis is the use of vitamin K and new oral anticoagulants, the use of which is increasing. The purpose of this review was to analyze of literature data regarding the impact of oral anticoagulants on the bone state, the risk of osteoporosis and its complications in order to improve the awareness of doctors of various specialties. Materials and methods. The lite­rature review was carried out based on the analysis of scientometric databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus using the keywords “vitamin K antagonists”; “warfarin; “osteoporosis”; “osteoporotic fracture”; “non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants”; “systematic review” for the period 2013-2023, but it did not exclude key works that were published earlier. The search was performed by two independent authors. 160 sources were selec­ted for analysis, of which 53 were used that met the search criteria. ­Results. The ana­lysis of researches showed that the effects of vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants on bone and the risk of fragility fractures are controversial. Nevertheless, the new oral anticoagulants in comparison to vitamin K antagonists seem to have a less negative effect on bone and the lowest risk of fragility fractures. The mechanism of such influence is still under examination. Conclusions. Most studies have demonstrated the adverse effects of vitamin K antagonists on bone health. A lower risk of fractures was observed with new oral anticoagulants than with vitamin K antagonists, in particular, warfarin. Taking into account the analyzed data of the literature, it is recommended to also assess the risk of fragility fractures when prescribing vitamin K antagonists or new oral anticoagulants.

Oral Anticoagulant Therapy and Risk of Admission to Long-Term Care in patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

The impact of oral anticoagulants (OACs) on the need of long-term care (LTC) in the aging and multimorbid population of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We conducted a nationwide cohort study to evaluate the effect of OACs on the need of LTC. Retrospective nationwide cohort study. The registry-based FinACAF cohort study covers all patients with incident AF from all levels of care in Finland from 2007 to 2018, as well as all their OAC purchases, LTC admissions, and information on previous home care acuity. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of LTC admission were calculated using Poisson regression models with a Lexis-type data structure based on 3 time scales: follow-up time from AF diagnosis, calendar year, and age. We identified 188,752 patients (49.0% female; mean age 71.4years; mean follow-up 3.6years) with incident AF without prior LTC, of whom 143,534 (76.0 %) initiated OAC therapy and 11,775 (6.2 %) were admitted to LTC. OAC therapy was associated with lower rates of LTC admission (adjusted IRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.82). When compared to warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with lower LTC admission rate (adjusted IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.79). No significant disparities were observed between different DOACs. OAC therapy, particularly with DOACs, is associated with a substantially lower risk of admission to LTC in patients with AF. Increasing guideline-based OAC coverage among patients with AF may prevent the need of LTC, lengthen survival at home, and potentially decrease health care costs.

The impact of oral anticoagulants on the characteristics of subdural hematomas and other brain lesions in patients with traumatic brain injury.

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of prior anticoagulant treatment on the characteristics of intracranial hematomas. We included in this retrospective study 135 patients who were diagnosed with subdural hematoma in the context of traumatic brain injury. We recorded the demographic and clinical data, the paraclinical examinations and the characteristics of subdural hematoma evidenced by preoperative computed tomography (CT). We also reported the other brain injuries, entailed by primary and secondary lesions, as described by CT. The anticoagulation therapy was recorded in 35 patients, at the moment of diagnosis. Acute subdural hematoma was recorded in 89 (65.9%) patients, 21 (60%) of these had anticoagulation therapy on admission. There were 46 (34.1%) patients with chronic subdural hematoma, 14 (40%) of these were on anticoagulant therapy. The midline shift was significantly moved in patients with anticoagulation therapy. The thickness of the subdural hematoma was significantly higher in patients with anticoagulation. We did not find any significant association of the other brain lesions (cranial fracture, extradural hematoma, intraparenchymal hematoma, nor intracranial hypertension, brain herniation, brain swelling), and the presence of anticoagulation therapy. The study showed that anticoagulants significantly influence some neuroimaging aspects of the SDH in head trauma.

Time at home among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: an ARISTOPHANES analysis

Abstract Background Patient-centered outcomes, such as home time, are becoming increasingly important quality-of-life measures. There are limited data on the impact of oral anticoagulants (OACs) on home time among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Purpose This analysis, based on the previously published ARISTOPHANES study, used five US insurance claims databases (CMS Medicare and four commercial databases) to compare home time among NVAF patients who were prescribed non-vitamin K antagonist OACs (NOACs). Methods Adult NVAF patients who were newly prescribed apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban (01JAN2013–30SEP2015) were selected. Time at home was calculated as the number of days from the index date (NOAC prescription) without any of the following: an inpatient, skilled nursing facility (SNF) or nursing facility, hospice, or inpatient rehabilitation facility admission. Time at home and without external AF-related care was defined as days from index date without any events from the home time endpoint or any days with a claim for bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE), AF, or an INR test. Time at home and without external AF-related care were measured during the 180 days of follow-up; patients were required to have been alive and have 180 days of follow-up post index. In each database, three 1:1 NOAC-NOAC propensity-score-matched (PSM) cohorts were created before combining the databases. For each NOAC-NOAC matched cohort, Poisson regression was conducted to compare time at home and time at home without external AF-related care. Results After PSM, 37,314 apixaban-dabigatran, 107,236 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 37,693 rivaroxaban-dabigatran patient pairs were created of which 37–44% had 180 days of follow-up available. Across the NOAC cohorts, approximately 21–25% of patients had an admission to a hospital, SNF, nursing facility, rehabilitation center, or hospice during the 180-day follow-up. The time at home was generally consistent between the NOAC cohorts (177 days); however, apixaban patients had 0.5 more days at home compared to rivaroxaban patients. Across all NOAC cohorts, 7–8% had a claim for a S/SE, 11–15% had a claim for bleeding, and 15–22% had an INR test, while 87–89% of all patients had an AF-claim during the 180-day follow-up. Patients prescribed apixaban had 1 more day at home without external AF-related care compared to dabigatran, and 1.5 more days at home without external AF-related care compared to rivaroxaban. Dabigatran had <1 more day at home without external AF-related care compared to rivaroxaban. Conclusion Among NVAF patients treated with NOACs, there were small differences in the time at home and time at home without external AF-related care during the first 6 months of NOAC treatment. As NVAF is a chronic condition, it is important to understand the impact of NOAC treatment on these patient-centered outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.

Anticoagulation with or without antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, when less is more: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background About 40% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) and an additional 10% develop AF after TAVR. However, there is paucity of data regarding the optimal antithrombotic regimen following TAVR in patients with a clinical indication for oral anticoagulants (OAC). Purpose To compare the prognostic impact of OAC plus at least one antiplatelet agent (APT) versus OAC therapy alone in patients undergoing TAVR. Methods We systematically searched the literature for studies evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of OAC + APT versus OAC alone in TAVR. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed comparing clinical outcomes between the two groups. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were the efficacy outcomes. Stroke and major bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding types 3 to 5, constituted the safety outcome. Results Overall, 398 titles and abstracts were identified through database searching. Four observational studies were selected, for a total of 1929 patients. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months (IQR 11.3–29.3), OAC + APT increased major bleeding events compared to OAC alone (OR=1.79; 95% CI 1.21–2.66; P=0.004) with no difference in stroke (OR 01.02; 95% CI 0.52–2.01; P=0.95), all-cause mortality (OR=1.07; 95% CI 0.78–1.47; P=0.66) and cardiovascular mortality (OR=1.08; 95% CI 0.79–1.47; P=0.62). Conclusion A combination strategy of OAC + APT provides increased risk of bleeding compared to OAC therapy alone in patients undergoing TAVR with similar outcomes in terms of stroke, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality; therefore, when feasible, it should be advised not to add APT on top of OAC therapy in patients without other clinical indications for APT treatment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Apixaban enhances endogenous fibrinolysis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AimsApproximately 20% of ischaemic stroke patients exhibit spontaneous arterial recanalization, attributable to endogenous fibrinolysis, which strongly relates to improved functional outcome. The impact of oral anticoagulants on endogenous fibrinolysis is unknown. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that apixaban enhances endogenous fibrinolysis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).Methods and resultsIn a prospective cross-sectional analysis, we compared endogenous fibrinolysis in NVAF patients (n = 180) taking aspirin, warfarin, or apixaban. In a prospective longitudinal study, patients were tested before and after apixaban (n = 80). Endogenous fibrinolysis was assessed using the Global Thrombosis Test (GTT) and thromboelastography (TEG). Endogenous fibrinolysis [measured by GTT lysis time (LT)] was shorter on apixaban compared with warfarin or aspirin [median 1850 (IQR 1591–2300) vs. 2758 (2014–3502) vs. 2135 (1752–2463) s, P < 0.0001]. Among TEG indices, a small but significant difference in clot lysis time (CLT) was observed [apixaban 60.0 (45.0–61.0) vs. warfarin 61.0 (57.0–62.0) vs. aspirin 61.0 (59.0–61.0) min, P = 0.036]. Apixaban improved endogenous fibrinolysis measured using the GTT [LT pre-treatment 2204 (1779–2738) vs. on-treatment 1882 (1607–2374) s, P = 0.0003], but not by using TEG. Change in LT (ΔLT) with apixaban correlated with baseline LT (r = 0.77, P < 0.0001). There was weak correlation between ΔLT and ΔCLT in response to apixaban (r = 0.28, P = 0.02) and between on-apixaban LT and CLT (r = 0.25, P = 0.022).ConclusionApixaban enhances endogenous fibrinolysis, with maximal effect in those with impaired fibrinolysis pre-treatment. Apixaban-treated patients exhibit more favourable fibrinolysis profiles than those taking warfarin or aspirin. Whether apixaban may confer additional thrombotic risk reduction in NVAF patients with impaired fibrinolysis, compared to warfarin, merits further study.

Impact of oral anticoagulants on 30-day readmission: a study from a single academic centre

Researchers are extensively searching for modifiable risk factors including high-risk medications such as anticoagulation to avoid rehospitalisation. The influence of oral anticoagulant therapy on hospital readmission is not known. We...

Oral Anticoagulants and Renal Impairment: The Convoluting Dilemma

Oral Anticoagulants and Renal Impairment: The Convoluting Dilemma

The Role of Oral Anticoagulants in Tumor Biology

Pathology studies of human cancers suggested to early investigators that the hemostatic system may play an important role in cancer metastasis. Subsequent studies in animal models have demonstrated a reduction of tumor metastasis and improved animal survival with systemic anticoagulation. In many of these experiments, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were utilized. Although warfarin was effective in reducing metastasis in a majority of these animal models, effects on the growth of the primary tumor and on animal survival have been less consistent. Clinical studies on the effect of warfarin in human malignancy are limited and less than conclusive. Several small, uncontrolled and controlled clinical studies have been reported but do not definitively suggest a benefit in most malignancies. However, none of the studies of VKAs in humans are adequately designed or sufficiently powered to definitively exclude an impact of oral anticoagulants on cancer survival. Because of the difficulties in managing VKA oral anticoagulation in cancer patients and recent studies suggesting a positive effect on cancer survival with low-molecular-weight heparins, it unlikely that further studies on the use of VKAs in cancer patients will be undertaken.