Ensemble-based sensitivity analysis (ESA) has been widely applied to identifying and investigating the sources of forecast uncertainty in tropical cyclone (TC) track. The standard ESA used in most preceding studies involves calculating the time-lagged covariance of ensemble perturbations by removing the ensemble mean. This method primarily focuses on the influence of initial errors. However, such studies ignore two critical dimensions of ESA. One is how ensemble sensitivity is influenced by the varying forecast performance across different ensemble prediction systems (EPSs). Secondly, the impact of model errors on forecast uncertainties remains unaddressed. An in-depth examination of these two aspects provides a more comprehensive understanding of the factors contributing to TC track uncertainties.This study employed the standard ESA to analyze and compare the sources of uncertainty in the track forecast of Typhoon In-fa (2021) in three representative operational EPSs. Our findings reveal that the EPS's specific performance in ensemble spread markedly influence ensemble sensitivity. We identified that variations in the shape and location of key synoptic systems, such as the western Pacific subtropical high and monsoon trough, across ensemble members were notably distinct. These variations played a significant role in shaping the uncertainty for In-fa's track forecast within each system. Furthermore, we introduced a modified ESA to better account for the influence of model errors on TC track uncertainties. The modified ESA, when applied to ensembles with substantial systematic deviations, predominantly reflects the impact of model errors on track forecast inaccuracies, offering a notably different perspective compared to the standard ESA. Significance statementEnsemble-based sensitivity analysis (ESA) serves as an effective method for identifying the origins of forecast uncertainty in tropical cyclone (TC) tracks. Most preceding studies based on the standard ESA have predominantly concentrated on examining key physical processes within individual ensemble prediction system (EPS) and the impact of initial condition uncertainties. They often overlook the dependence of the ensemble sensitivity on the varying forecast performance of EPSs, as well as the impact of model errors on sensitivity assessment. This study revealed that the ensemble forecasts across different EPSs exhibit different performance in terms of ensemble spread in the shape and location of primary weather systems. This variability significantly contributes to the uncertainty in TC track forecasts through diverse processes. Furthermore, this research introduced a modified ESA, which effectively identifies the impact of model systematic deviations on TC track forecast errors. This approach along with the standard ESA provide a more comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the forecast error sensitivity associated with both initial condition and model related uncertainties.