questions about a research study scenario where parental consent was not required for adolescent participation. Data analyzed in SPSS, version 19.0. Results:Respondents (n 153)were predominately female (73.2%), white (87.6%), and had a mean age of 39.4 years (SD 10.4). Most respondents were married or living with a partner (68.0%) and had some college (54.3%). Most respondents had at least one 13-17 year old living with them (58.2%). Most respondents reported it was important for adolescents to participate in H.E.R. about driving (84.7%), birth control (84.9%), STIs (88.9%), and sex education (90.2%). Respondents reported whether 14, 15, 16, and 17 year olds should be allowed to participate in H.E.R., with andwithout parental consent, for driving behavior, preventing teen pregnancy, and preventing sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Topics were grouped by age for analysis. Responses were scored from zero (indicating no participation should be allowed) to three (indicating adolescents should be allowed to participate inH.E.R. on all three topics). A significantmean difference in rank was found indicating that as adolescents aged, respondents increasingly agreed that teens should be allowed to participant in H.E.R with parental consent (x2 (3) 28.7, p .001) with mean rank increases from 2.37 at age 14 to 2.60 at age 17. Additionally, a significantmean difference in rankwas found indicating that as adolescents aged, respondents increasingly agreed that teens should be allowed to participant in H.E.R without parental consent (x2 (3) 131.5, p .001)withmean rank increases from2.02 at age 14 to 2.93 at age 17. Respondentswere then given a description of a research study where teen women could participate in an internet-based intervention without parental consent. Given a list of options, respondents wanted to know who would have access to their daughter’s information (75.2%), study conclusions (70.6%), to view the videos (69.9%), and to view the survey questions (65.4%) with the greatest frequency. They least frequently wanted to know reimbursement for participation (28.1%). Conclusions: Responses to perception questions did not significantly vary by respondent demographics. An open ended question about theoretical study participation elicited a range of supportive and unsupportive comments. For adolescents as young as 14; adults support adolescent participation in H.E.R. with and without parental consent. Support increases with older adolescents. Given options, adult respondents express concerns about privacy of information; have an interest in study outcomes and study content; and are least concerned about reimbursement for participation. Sources of Support: Subcontract through CarnegieMellon University with DHHROffice of Adolescent Health (5 TP1A40-03-00).