Impact Of Coronary Calcium Score Research Articles

The impact of coronary calcium score as an addition to myocardial perfusion imaging in altering clinical management (ICCAMPA trial)

Introduction: AimMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a key tool for the identification and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. The use of a coronary calcium score further adds to prognostic data above MPI alone. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the extent to which the use of a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, when co-reported with MPI, impacts changes in clinical management in patients without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing functional imaging. MethodsThis is a multicenter international study which incorporated a standardized questionnaire to evaluate changes in clinician management after MPI results were given with and without the additional information of a CAC score. Calcium scoring on a SPECT-CT system was performed via a semiquantitative Shemesh score (0-12) with a 0-3 score from the left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. CT of the chest was read independently, and non-coronary findings were reported alongside the CAC score. ResultsA total of 281 patients were enrolled across 3 international centers (Brazil, Australia, New Zealand). Of the 281 patients, 133 (47%) had management altered after the clinician was made aware of the CAC score. The impact of the CAC in changing clinical management was significant, particularly in patients with a negative MPI (P < 0.0001), but also in MPI-positive patients (P = 0.0021). The most common management change was the addition or intensification of statin therapy. ConclusionThe addition of the CAC component to MPI yielded significant management changes in nearly half of all patients undergoing MPI for suspected CAD. This trend was observed across all centers in the three countries involved and was particularly evident in patient with a negative MPI.

Impact of coronary calcium score and lesion characteristics on the diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.

To evaluate the impact of coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, minimal lumen area (MLA), and length of coronary artery stenosis on the diagnostic performance of the machine-learning-based computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (ML-FFR). In 471 patients with coronary artery disease, computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography were performed with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in 557 lesions at a single centre. Diagnostic performances of ML-FFR, computational fluid dynamics-based CT-FFR (CFD-FFR), MLA, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), and visual stenosis grading were evaluated using invasive FFR as a reference standard. Diagnostic performances were analysed according to lesion characteristics including the MLA, length of stenosis, CAC score, and stenosis degree. ML-FFR was obtained by automated feature selection and model building from quantitative CTA. A total of 272 lesions showed significant ischaemia, defined by invasive FFR ≤0.80. There was a significant correlation between CFD-FFR and ML-FFR (r = 0.99, P < 0.001). ML-FFR showed moderate sensitivity and specificity in the per-patient analysis. Diagnostic performances of CFD-FFR and ML-FFR did not decline in patients with high CAC scores (CAC > 400). Sensitivities of CFD-FFR and ML-FFR showed a downward trend along with the increase in lesion length and decrease in MLA. The area under the curve (AUC) of ML-FFR (0.73) was higher than those of QCA and visual grading (AUC = 0.65 for both, P < 0.001) and comparable to those of MLA (AUC = 0.71, P = 0.21) and CFD-FFR (AUC = 0.73, P = 0.86). ML-FFR showed comparable results to MLA and CFD-FFR for the prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia. Specificities and accuracies of CFD-FFR and ML-FFR decreased with smaller MLA and long lesion length.

The prognostic impact of coronary calcium score in low risk patients presenting with chest pain; a 6-year follow-up single center study

Abstract Background Evaluation and risk stratification of patients with chest pain is a frequent task in cardiology. Coronary artery calcium is an established risk marker and is in wide clinical use. However, less is known about the long-term prognostic implications of coronary calcium score values in low risk individuals. Purpose We wanted to investigate the long-term outcome related to coronary artery calcium score (CAC). Methods We included patients who were examined with coronary CT angiography or GT SPECT from August 2011 to August 2015. The coronary calcium score percentile was calculated using the MESA Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) Score Reference Values web tool. We excluded patients already stratified as high risk due to previous myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. The primary endpoint was a composite of 5 point MACE (death, myocardial infarction, PCI, CABG and stroke) and was extracted from the electronic medical records. We censored follow up on the 31st December 2018. Results We included 1975 patients (958 (48.5%) male, age 60.3±12.0). The average CAC was 288±701. After median follow up of 6.0 (5.3–6.5 IQR) years, 372 patients fulfilled a primary endpoint. Event rate increased significantly with higher percentiles of CAC score (log rank 0.001, Figure 1). A total of 687 patients had a CAC score of 0. In this group we observed only 21 events during 6 years follow up, giving an annual event rate of 0.6%. Annual event rate in the patients with CAC percentile 1–75 was 3.2% and in the patients with CAC percentile 75–99 annual event rate was 5.6%. Death occurred in 10% of patients in the two upper percentiles compared to only 2% in the lowest percentile (p&amp;lt;0.001) Conclusion Our findings support that CAC is a powerful predictor of coronary artery events. Furthermore, our study confirms excellent long term prognosis regarding cardiac events in patients with 0 CAC, which is helpful in risk stratification of patients with chest pain. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

416 The Impact of Coronary Calcium Score as an Addition to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Altering Clinical Management (ICCAMPA Trial)

416 The Impact of Coronary Calcium Score as an Addition to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Altering Clinical Management (ICCAMPA Trial)

Impact of coronary artery calcification on percutaneous coronary intervention and postprocedural complications

BackgroundExcessive coronary calcification can lead to adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore evaluated the impact of coronary calcium score (CCS) measured by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) on immediate complications of PCI and rate of restenosis. MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 84 patients with coronary stenosis diagnosed by MDCT who underwent PCI. The Agatston method was used to measure total, target-vessel, and segmental (stent deployment site) CCS. ResultsIn 108 PCI procedures, 32 lesions (29.5%) were American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type A, 60 (55.5%) were type B, and 16 (15%) were type C. ANOVA showed significantly higher segmental CCS in type C than in type A lesions (29±51 vs. 214±162; p=0.03). Six patients (7.1%) had periprocedural complications and seven (8.3%) had in-stent restenosis and angina. Mean total, target-vessel, and segmental CCS was significantly higher in complicated than in successful PCI (199±325 vs. 816±624, p=0.001; 92±207 vs. 337±157, p=0.001; and 79±158 vs. 256±142, p=0.003, respectively), but there was no significant difference in CCS between successful PCI and PCI complicated by late restenosis. ConclusionsCCS measured by MDCT has an important role in predicting early, but not late, complications from PCI.

Impact of coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for coronary CT angiography

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the thresholds of coronary calcium score (CCS) above which coronary CT angiography (CCTA) should be aborted because of the limitation of diagnostic ability. Methods: Consecutive 500 symptomatic patients (64±12 years old) who were referred for diagnostic CCTA were investigated. Subjects underwent CCS measurements and CCTA using 64-slice high definition CT. Inconclusive CCTA was defined as the case with at least one non-evaluable segment in major coronary vessels due to heavy calcification. Results: Mean CCS of all 500 patients was 152±368 (0-2595). Of these, 17 (3%) resulted in inconclusive CCTA due to heavy calcification. The sensitivity and specificity curves identified 540 as optimal thresholds of CCS to predict inconclusive CCTA (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.94). Area under the curve of ROC analysis was 0.98. Among the 17 cases with inconclusive CCTA (CCS 1380±675), 14 (82%) underwent catheter coronary angiography (CAG), of these, 13 (93%) needed subsequent coronary revascularization (PCI 10, CABG 3). Conclusions: In cases with inconclusive CCTA due to heavy calcification, high prevalence of severe coronary artery disease was revealed with CAG. CCS>540 should alert us to potential diagnostic limitation with CCTA, thus further evaluation with CCTA is not warranted as those patients should be referred to CAG to avoid repeat radiation exposure.

Impact of Coronary Calcium Score on the Prevalence of Coronary Artery Stenosis on Dual Source CT Coronary Angiography in Caucasian Patients with an Intermediate Risk

To investigate the prevalence of significant coronary artery stenosis on coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) in symptomatic Caucasian patients with an intermediate risk score at different levels of coronary artery calcification (CAC). In total, 383 consecutive symptomatic Caucasian patients (147 females, 60 ± 13 years) with an intermediate risk score underwent nonenhanced CT for CAC scoring immediately before contrast-enhanced cCTA on a dual-source CT scanner. Additionally clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was performed in 90 patients. The prevalence of significant coronary artery stenosis (>50%) on cCTA and ICA was correlated at different CAC score levels. Of 121 patients with a zero CAC score, none had significant coronary artery stenosis on cCTA or ICA. Coronary CTA diagnosed in 54 of 70 patients with high CAC score (>400), a significant stenosis. Subsequent ICA confirmed significant stenosis in 30 of 32 patients. Sensitivity and a negative predictive value of CAC score ruling out significant stenosis on cCTA were 100% and 100%, respectively, using cutoff value of zero and specificity and positive predictive value to predict significant stenosis on cCTA were 79% and 51%, respectively, using a cutoff value of >400. Significant coronary artery stenosis is extremely unlikely, with an estimated risk of 4 in 1000 patients in symptomatic Caucasian patients with an intermediate risk score and negative CAC score. To reduce radiation exposure, radiation-free tests should be considered for differential diagnosis of chest pain in these patients.

The impact of coronary calcium score and cardiac risk factors on coronary endothelial function

Methods Following navigator coronary MRA scout images, the LAD lumen was imaged in short axis before and during the cold pressor test (CPT) in normal controls and subjects with one or more atherosclerotic risk factors using either supine breath-hold double inversion T2 weighted spin echo imaging (38 subjects, 1.5 T Siemens Sonata) or prone breath-hold SSFP retrospectively gated cine imaging with a 4 element phased array carotid coil (39 subjects, 1.5 T Siemens Avanto). The % change in LAD lumen area with CPT was calculated. CT calcium scores were available or obtained by protocol in each subject and those undergoing prone imaging also had coronary CT angiography to exclude coronary stenoses. Linear associations between continuous variables were measured by Pearson and Spearman (non-parametric) correlation coefficients. ROC analysis was also performed. A p-value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Impact of coronary calcium score on diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of coronary artery disease

The impact of the coronary calcium score on the diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) to detect obstructive coronary stenoses remains controversial. We examined 41 patients (mean Agatston score, 340 +/- 530 [range, 0-2546]) with coronary artery disease with 16-slice MSCT and 60 patients (mean Agatston score, 446 +/- 877 [range, 0-6264]) with 64-slice MSCT. MSCT scans were analyzed with invasive coronary angiography (CA) as the standard of reference. Lesions with luminal narrowing of 50% or greater were considered obstructive. In total, 9% and 2% of uninterpretable segments were excluded from analysis in patients examined with 16- and 64-slice MSCT, respectively. On a segment basis, the percentage of false-negative segments in the groups with Agatston scores of 0 to 100, 101 to 400, and greater than 400 with 16-slice MSCT were 0%, 5.3%, and 2.9% (P = .0005), respectively; other comparisons of false-positive and false-negative segments were not significant. The sensitivity and specificity on a vessel and patient basis with 16- and 64-slice MSCT were not significantly different in different calcium score groups. A slight impact of coronary calcium was observed on the diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice MSCT CA on a segment basis, with no significant impact on a vessel and patient basis. No significant impact of coronary calcium was observed on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice MSCT CA on a segment, vessel, or patient basis.

Impact of Coronary Calcium Score on Diagnostic Accuracy for the detection of Significant Coronary Stenosis With Multislice Computed Tomography Angiography

One hundred twenty patients in sinus rhythm with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent multislice computed tomography of the heart and conventional coronary angiography were retrospectively selected. The population was divided into 2 groups depending on their calcium score (CS) (e.g., low CS and high CS). The diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomographic scans for detecting significant lesions (>50% lumen reduction) in both groups was compared with quantitative coronary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of multislice computed tomography were 90% and 92%, and 97% and 91% for low and high CS groups, respectively.