Impact Of Biological Agents Research Articles

Impact of biological agents and tofacitinib for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis on health-related quality of life: a protocol for a network meta-analysis

IntroductionIn the past few years, several options have been proposed as alternative and more effective therapeutic drugs for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), such as biological agents and tofacitinib. Most of...

Impact of Biological Agents on Postsurgical Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multicentre Study of Geteccu.

Background: The impact of biologics on the risk of postoperative complications (PC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is still an ongoing debate. This lack of evidence is more relevant for ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Aims: To evaluate the impact of biologics on the risk of PC. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 37 centres. Patients treated with biologics within 12 weeks before surgery were considered “exposed”. The impact of the exposure on the risk of 30-day PC and the risk of infections was assessed by logistic regression and propensity score-matched analysis. Results: A total of 1535 surgeries were performed on 1370 patients. Of them, 711 surgeries were conducted in the exposed cohort (584 anti-TNF, 58 vedolizumab and 69 ustekinumab). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2–2.0), urgent surgery (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.2), laparotomy approach (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–1.9) and severe anaemia (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3–2.6) had higher risk of PC, while academic hospitals had significantly lower risk. Exposure to biologics (either anti-TNF, vedolizumab or ustekinumab) did not increase the risk of PC (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.97–1.58), although it could be a risk factor for postoperative infections (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.03–2.27). Conclusions: Preoperative administration of biologics does not seem to be a risk factor for overall PC, although it may be so for postoperative infections.

P319 Impact of biological agents on postoperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease: a multicentre study of GETECCU

Abstract Background It has been suggested that biologic therapy may increase the risk of postoperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the evidence is scarce. Our aim was to evaluate whether the treatment with anti-TNF agents, ustekinumab or vedolizumab increase the risk of complications after surgery. Methods IBD patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery between 1st January 2009 and 31st December of 2019 were retrospectively selected. Data collection included clinical characteristic of IBD, biochemical parameters and surgical aspects. Postoperative complications (PC) were defined as those occurring within 30 days after surgery. Exposed cohort (EC): Patients who received the last dose of the biologic within 3 months before surgery. Non-exposed cohort (NEC): Patients who did not receive biologic treatment within 3 moths prior to surgery. Predictive factors for PC and for infections were identified by logistic regression analyses. A genetic matching score was performed to balance the clinical characteristics of both groups. Results A total of 1,535 surgeries performed in 37 centres were included: 81% in Crohn’s disease, 18% in ulcerative colitis and 1% in unclassified-IBD patients. A total of 711 surgeries (46.3%) had been exposed to biologics (583 under anti-TNF therapy, 58 under vedolizumab and 69 under ustekinumab) and 824 surgeries (53.7%) the NEC. PC were reported in 38% (n=267) of patients in the exposed cohort and in 34% (n=280) of patients in the non-exposed one (p=0.15), including dehiscence, infection, obstruction, ileus, bleeding, thrombosis, fistula and evisceration. The most frequent complications were infections (48% of all the cases). A 30-day hospital readmission was needed in 7% (n=110) of the patients, and 2% (n=29) required a new surgery with no differences (p>0.05). Multivariate analysis for PC and infections is presented in table 1. The frequencies of PC for each biologic in the univariate analysis are represented in figure 1. No specific treatment was associated to PC or infections in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Preoperative administration of biological therapy does not seem to be a risk factor for overall PC, although it may be for postoperative infections.

Impact of Biological Agents on Imaging and Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

The effect of biologics on the risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with psoriasis is still unclear despite their widespread use. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of licensed biological therapies on imaging and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease risk in patients with psoriasis by a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. A comprehensive search of studies published before 1 June 2020 was performed in Medline-Ovid, EMBASE, and CENTRAL using a predefined strategy to identify relevant articles. Five studies were included for the final examination, and two studies were included in the meta-analysis. We did not find a significant reduction in aortic vascular inflammation in patients treated with adalimumab compared with those who received placebo at weeks 12-16. There was no beneficial effect on imaging biomarkers (aortic vascular inflammation or flow-mediated dilatation) of cardiovascular disease risk in patients exposed to biological therapies (adalimumab and secukinumab) compared with those exposed to placebo, except for ustekinumab showing a reduction in aortic vascular inflammation at week 12 but not at week 52 after the open-label extension period. The strongest reduction in blood-based cardiometabolic risk biomarkers was observed with adalimumab (CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, and GlycA) and phototherapy (CRP and IL-6) compared with that observed with placebo. Randomized controlled trials show that ustekinumab reduces aortic vascular inflammation and that TNF-α inhibitors and phototherapy reduce CRP and IL-6. These surrogate marker findings require randomized controlled trials evaluating cardiovascular events to inform clinical practice.

Impact of biological agents on the prevalence of chemotherapy associated liver injury (CALI): Multicentric study of patients operated for colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundThe prevalence of chemotherapy associated liver injuries (CALI), especially SOS (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome) and NRH (nodular regenerative hyperplasia) might be reduced since the introduction of routine use of biological agents with chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). MethodsOne hundred patients with CRLM having undergone at least one liver segment resection were prospectively included, and chemotherapy data recorded. Specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist and CALI were described. Prevalence of CALI was compared to our previous experience published in 2013. NRH diagnosis was performed on reticulin special stain, by contrast to our previous study. Postoperative outcome was analysed. ResultsBevacizumab was more frequently administrated in patients of the present study: 53/100 (53%) compared to 20/151 (13%), p < 0.0001. Overall, in the present series, SOS was only observed in 28/100 (28%) patients compared to 116/151 (77%) in 2013 (p < 0.001). When looking specifically to patients receiving Bevacizumab with Folfox, we observed a reduced SOS prevalence compared to Folfox alone (p = 0.008). A higher prevalence of NRH was found in the present study, related to increased detection accuracy, but in patients receiving Bevacizumab in association with Folfox, this prevalence was also reduced compared to Folfox alone (p = 0.03). Both SOS and NRH were associated with severe complications (p = 0.008 and p = 0.005, respectively) and postoperative liver insufficiency (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). ConclusionsThe routine use of Bevacizumab in association with Folfox significantly reduced CALI prevalence, in turn linked to severe postoperative complications.

Impact of Biological Agents and Plant Essential Oils on Growth, Quality and Productivity of Cabbage and Cauliflower Plants Correlated to Some Diseases Control

Impact of Biological Agents and Plant Essential Oils on Growth, Quality and Productivity of Cabbage and Cauliflower Plants Correlated to Some Diseases Control

IMPACT OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY ON BONE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

The paper gives the data currently available in the literature on the impact of biological agents (BA) on bone mineral density, metabolism, and remodeling in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These agents, by virtue of their high efficacy, are widely used to treat patients with RA. Since localized and generalized bone resorption and destruction play a prominent role in its pathogenesis, an investigation of the effect of BA on bone may be of essential interest. Activated osteoclastogenesis occurs because of an interaction between the immune and bone systems under the influence of different proinflammatory cytokines. The inhibition of the latter has been ascertained to not only reduce joint inflammation, but also to prevent localized and generalized osteoporosis. This review discusses the results of these trials and the issues of further investigations.

Impact of Biological Agents and Tissue Engineering Approaches on the Treatment of Rheumatic Diseases

The treatment of rheumatic diseases has been the focus of many clinical studies aiming to achieve the best combination of drugs for symptom reduction. Although improved understanding of the pathophysiology of rheumatic diseases has led to the identification of effective therapeutic strategies, its cure remains unknown. Biological agents are a breakthrough in the treatment of these diseases. They proved to be more effective than the other conventional therapies in refractory inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Among them, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are widely used, namely Etanercept, Infliximab, or Adalimumab, alone or in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Nevertheless, severe adverse effects have been detected in patients with history of recurrent infections, including cardiac failure or malignancy. Currently, most of the available therapies for rheumatic diseases do not have sufficient tissue specificity. Consequently, high drug doses must be administrated systemically, leading to adverse side effects associated with its possible toxicity. Drug delivery systems, by its targeted nature, are excellent solutions to overcome this problem. In this review, we will describe the state-of-the-art in clinical studies on the treatment of rheumatic diseases, emphasizing the use of biological agents and target drug delivery systems. Some alternative novel strategies of regenerative medicine and its implications for rheumatic diseases will also be discussed.