Impact Of 3D Technology Research Articles

A Study on the Impact of 3D Printing and Artificial Intelligence on Education and Learning Process

Artificial intelligence is part of our future and has allowed the creation of truly advanced devices. Now 3D printing technology can also make full use of AI, and with the development of this technology, it is expected to be used in various fields in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This technology can be used not only in manufacturing but also in various fields such as architecture and medical care and is recognized as an essential technology for future generations. Educating the students about the use and impact of 3D technology is even more important than it was ever; however, not enough research has been conducted on specific teaching methods for 3D printing technology education. This paper, therefore, studies the future education method using 3D printing technology for children. The research method of this study is a qualitative research method in which interviews and participant observation methods are used. This qualitative research method was developed by James P. Spradley, an American cultural anthropologist. The findings of this study are as follows. Children can make products easily by using 3D programs and can develop creativity through this product design process. Based on these results, this paper aims to present the curriculum and teaching methods of 3D printing that can be practically utilized in public education courses. This education will be a preparatory step for the micro-manufacturing industry in the future. The findings of this study are helpful in developing the courses of future education.

The Impact of 3D Technology in Optimizing Midface Fracture Treatment—Focus on the Zygomatic Bone

In the context of the ongoing development and expanding availability of 3-dimensional (3D) printing, there is increasing interest in designing simplified workflows that would encourage more medical practitioners to include 3D printing in their current practice. The purpose of this study is to present our experience regarding the use of 3D printing in the preoperative planning and management of acute midface trauma, an area less explored by existing studies. We performed a retrospective case series study including admitted patients who underwent surgical repair of midface fractures, in which 3D-printed stereolithic models were used preoperatively for shaping the osteosynthesis material. We recorded standard information about the patients, imaging method used, and type of midface fracture. We also logged the details and durations of each main step in the preoperative 3D printing workflow and documented the durations and outcomes of each surgical procedure. We identified 29 cases of midface fractures that benefited of a preoperative stereolithic model. From the 2 main methods of obtaining the virtual model, mirroring and virtual fracture reduction, the longest duration was recorded in a case in which the later method was used. The longest stereolithic model printing time was found in a complex midface fracture case. All the prebent osteosynthesis material was used intraoperatively and fitted the reduced fracture sites, also serving as an intraoperative guide for correct fracture reduction. The particularities, benefits, as well as the possible challenges associated with the application of 3D printing in acute trauma cases are discussed. Our 3D printing protocol was applicable and rendered favorable outcomes in the acute midface trauma setting. Proper understanding of the steps involved in achieving the stereolithic model is key for the adaptation of 3D printing to the current management of acute midface trauma.