Immunotherapy In Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Exploring the potential of combination immune checkpoint strategies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

9037 Background: The clinical outcomes for patients with NSCLC remain suboptimal despite recent advancements in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies. Thus, identification of rational combinations of novel immune checkpoint (IC) strategies is imperative. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize the expression of IC targets to inform drug development and design effective combinatorial strategies, to advance the search for optimized therapies for NSCLC. Methods: We analyzed the differential gene expression of IC targets in 537 primary lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) samples and 59 normal lung tissue samples pre-immunotherapy receipt using RNA-sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Gene expression of IC-targets including PDCD1 (PD-1), CD274 (PD-L1), CTLA4, TIGIT, LAG3, HAVCR2 (TIM-3), VSIR (VISTA), ICOS, CD276 (B7-H3), BTLA, IDO1, KLRD1 (CD94/NKG2A), NT5E (CD73), TNFRSF4 (OX-40), TNFRSF18 (GITR), and TNFRSF9 (4-1BB) were obtained. Differential gene expression was determined intra-tumorally by comparison of transcripts per million and inter-tumorally using the DESeq2 algorithm. Log2 fold change >0.5 and false discovery rate adjusted P<0.05 were used as criteria for significant differential expression. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify subsets of tumors with similar profiles of IC-targetable gene expression. Results: Tumors showed significantly increased expression of TNFRSF18 (GITR), NT5E (CD73), TNFRSF9 (4-1BB), LAG3, TIGIT, CTLA4, PD-1, BTLA, B7-H3, and OX-40 (Table 1). On the other hand, tumors exhibited significant downregulation of CD274 (PD-L1), HAVCR2 (TIM-3), ICOS, KLRD1 (CD94/NKG2A), and VSIR (VISTA). Hierarchical clustering revealed recurrent patterns of IC gene overexpression which were characterized by: 1) IDO1-hi, 2) CD276-mid + TNFRSF18-mid, 3) VSIR-hi, 4) CD276-hi, 5) NT5E-hi, and 6) CD276-mid + NT5E-mid. Interestingly, patterns of IC gene expression distinguish tumors from controls. Of note, high VSIR expression was specific to normal tissue rather than tumors. Conclusions: Our study identified many IC targetable genes that were significantly overexpressed in tumors. However, subsets of tumors showed distinct and segregable combinations of overexpressed IC genes. These results suggest heterogeneous mechanisms of immune evasion in NSCLC, which may explain suboptimal outcomes with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based strategies in this patient population. Our findings emphasize the importance of biomarker-guided approaches for the optimal selection of ICs and the development of rational combinatorial immunotherapies in NSCLC.

Immune phenotype-driven treatment outcome of IO-only versus chemo-IO in PD-L1-high, first-line, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

e21179 Background: PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) is the only biomarker for clinical decision-making regarding immunotherapy (IO) in advanced NSCLC. Currently, there is uncertainty when selecting treatment options between IO monotherapy (IO-only) and in combination with chemotherapy (Chemo-IO) when solely based on PD-L1, in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Here, we explored a novel biomarker, immune phenotype as assessed by artificial intelligence (AI)-powered spatial tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) analysis to provide additional information in determining first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, using a real-world dataset. Methods: A total of 349 whole-slide images (WSIs) of H&E-stained slides for advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients without actionable EGFR mutation and ALK translocation treated with IO-only or Chemo-IO as their first-line were retrospectively collected from Samsung Medical Center. An AI-powered spatial TIL analyzer, Lunit SCOPE IO classified inflamed immune phenotype (IIP, the proportion of inflamed area ≥ 33.3% in tumor microenvironment) versus non-inflamed IP (non-IIP). PD-L1 TPS was assessed based on PD-L1 pharmDx 22C3 staining. Progression-free survival (PFS) was measured by the investigators per RECIST v1.1. Results: In the analysis set, all IO-only group (n = 84) had TPS ≥ 50%, but Chemo-IO group (n = 265) consisted of 21.1%, 29.8%, and 49.1% of TPS ≥ 50%, 1-49%, and < 1%, respectively. Proportions of squamous cell carcinoma were not significantly different between IO-only and Chemo-IO (32.1% vs 27.5%, p = 0.5008). Proportions of IIP were significantly correlated with the TPS group, as they were 33.6%, 19.0%, and 13.1% in TPS ≥ 50%, 1-49%, and < 1%, respectively (p = 0.0002). In the merged dataset (n = 349), PFS was significantly increased in IIP (22.6%) compared to non-IIP (median PFS [mPFS] 14.6 vs 6.0 m, 6-m PFS rate 72.1% vs 49.9%, hazard ratio [HR, 95% confidence interval] 0.57 [0.39-0.82], p = 0.0014). In TPS ≥ 50% group, IIP was significantly correlated with favorable PFS in IO-only group (IIP vs non-IIP; mPFS 14.6 vs 4.6 m, 6-m rate 65.5 vs 45.2%, HR 0.55 [0.31-0.98], p = 0.0375), however, it was not statistically different in Chemo-IO (n = 56, mPFS not reached [NR] vs 8.3 m, 6-m rate 88.5 vs 65.3%, HR 0.45 [0.15-1.33], p = 0.1185). Interestingly, in the subgroup of TPS ≥ 50% with IIP (n = 47), PFS was not significantly different based on treatment regimen (Chemo-IO vs IO-only, mPFS NR vs 14.6 m, 6-m rate 88.5 vs 65.5%, HR 0.52 [0.17-1.59], p = 0.2263), but Chemo-IO was significantly superior to IO-only in TPS ≥ 50% with non-IIP group (n = 93, mPFS 8.3 vs 4.6 m, 6-m rate 65.3 vs 45.2%, HR 0.53 [0.30-0.94], p = 0.0255). Conclusions: Immune Phenotype based on AI-powered spatial TIL analysis may provide complementary information for clinical decision-making between IO-only and Chemo-IO in advanced NSCLC patients with TPS ≥ 50%.

LncRNA PCBP1-AS1 mediated downregulation of ITGAL as a prognostic biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma.

Integrin alpha L (ITGAL) seemed to play a critical role in carcinogenesis and immune regulation. Nevertheless, the effects of ITGAL on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain elusive. The present paper intended to determine the effects of ITGAL in NSCLC via the integration of bioinformatic analyses. In this study, we found that the mRNA and protein levels of ITGAL were downregulated in NSCLC tissues. Significantly, low ITGAL expression was related to poorer prognosis and increased malignancy of NSCLC. In addition, GO analysis and KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the coexpressed genes of ITGAL were predominantly associated with various immune-associated signaling pathways, like the T cell receptor signaling pathway, Th17 cell differentiation, chemokine signaling pathway, and NF-κB signaling pathway. Our result indicated that lncRNA-mediated downregulation of integrin alpha L expression was tightly related to immunocyte infiltration, immune modulators, and chemotactic factors in NSCLC, which potentially serves as a biomarker for clinical prognosis prediction and immunotherapy of NSCLC. This is the first comprehensive analysis of ITGAL in the prognosis, immune microenvironment, and immunotherapy of lung adenocarcinoma. ITGAL are promising biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes and immunotherapy responses in patients with NSCLC.

PD-1 blockade potentiates neoadjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC via increasing CD127+ and KLRG1+ CD8 T cells

The combination of PD-1 blockade with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has achieved unprecedented clinical success in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to NAC alone, but the underlying mechanisms by which PD-1 blockade augments the effects of chemotherapy remain incompletely elucidated. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on CD45+ immune cells isolated from surgically resected fresh tumors of seven NSCLC patients receiving NAC or neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (NAPC). Multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry was performed on FFPE tissues before and after NAC or NAPC from 65 resectable NSCLC patients, and results were validated with GEO dataset. NAC resulted in an increase only of CD20+ B cells, whereas NAPC increased the infiltration of CD20+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD4+CD127+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD8+CD127+ and CD8+KLRG1+ T cells. Synergistic increase in B and T cells promotes favorable therapeutic response after NAPC. Spatial distribution analysis discovered that CD8+ T cells and their CD127+ and KLRG1+ subsets were in closer proximity to CD4+ T/CD20+ B cells in NAPC versus NAC. GEO dataset validated that B-cell, CD4, memory, and effector CD8 signatures correlated with therapeutic responses and clinical outcomes. The addition of PD-1 blockade to NAC promoted anti-tumor immunity through T and B cells recruitment in the tumor microenvironment and induced tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells skewed toward CD127+ and KLRG1+ phenotypes, which may be assisted by CD4+ T cells and B cells. Our comprehensive study identified key immune cell subsets exerting anti-tumor responses during PD-1 blockade therapy and that may be therapeutically targeted to improve upon existing immunotherapies for NSCLC.

Advances in efficacy prediction and monitoring of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become mainstream in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The idea of harnessing the immune system to fight cancer is fast developing. Neoadjuvant treatment in NSCLC is undergoing unprecedented change. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations not only seem to achieve population-wide treating coverage irrespective of PD-L1 expression but also enable achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). Despite these recent advancements in neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, not all patients respond favorably to treatment with ICIs plus chemo and may even suffer from severe immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Similar to selection for target therapy, identifying patients most likely to benefit from chemo-immunotherapy may be valuable. Recently, several prognostic and predictive factors associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in NSCLC, such as tumor-intrinsic biomarkers, tumor microenvironment biomarkers, liquid biopsies, microbiota, metabolic profiles, and clinical characteristics, have been described. However, a specific and sensitive biomarker remains to be identified. Recently, the construction of prediction models for ICI therapy using novel tools, such as multi-omics factors, proteomic tests, host immune classifiers, and machine learning algorithms, has gained attention. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different positive prognostic and predictive factors in treating preoperative patients with ICIs, highlight the recent advances made in the efficacy prediction of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and provide an outlook for joint predictors.

GBP5 Identifies Immuno-Hot Tumors and Predicts the Therapeutic Response to Immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Immunotherapy drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have been approved for first- and second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but only a portion of patients respond to ICIs. It is crucial to screen the beneficiaries of immunotherapy through biomarkers accurately. Several datasets were used to explore the predictive value for immunotherapy and immune relevance of guanylate binding protein 5 (GBP5) in NSCLC, including the GSE126044 dataset, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) dataset, the Kaplan-Meier plotter dataset, the HLuA150CS02 cohort, and the HLugS120CS01 cohort. GBP5 was upregulated in tumor tissues but associated with a good prognosis in NSCLC. Moreover, our findings demonstrated that GBP5 was strongly correlated with the expression of many immune-related genes, TIIC levels, and PD-L1 expression based on RNA-seq data onto online databases and validation of the NSCLC tissue microarray using IHC staining. Moreover, pan-cancer analysis has shown that GBP5 was a factor in identifying immuno-hot tumors, except for a few tumor types. In summary, our current research suggests that GBP5 expression is a potential biomarker for predicting the outcome of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. More research with large-scale samples is needed to determine their value as biomarkers of ICIs benefit.

Potential biomarkers for immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

For individuals with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the primary treatment is platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), primarily PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4, have been found to be effective in patients with NSCLC who have no EGFR/ALK mutations. Furthermore, ICIs are considered a standard therapy. The quantity of fresh immunogenic antigens discovered by cytotoxic T cells was measured by PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB), which were the first biomarkers assessed in clinical trials. However, immunotherapy did not have response efficacy markers similar to targeted therapy, highlighting the significance of newly developed biomarkers. This investigation aims to review the research on immunotherapy for NSCLC, focusing primarily on the impact of biomarkers on efficacy prediction to determine whether biomarkers may be utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of immunotherapy.

The emerging nanomedicine-based technology for non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: how far are we from an effective treatment.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prominent etiology of cancer-related mortality. The heterogeneous nature of this disease impedes its accurate diagnosis and efficacious treatment. Consequently, constant advancements in research are imperative in order to comprehend its intricate nature. In addition to currently available therapies, the utilization of nanotechnology presents an opportunity to enhance the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients. Notably, the burgeoning knowledge of the interaction between the immune system and cancer itself paves the way for developing novel, emerging immunotherapies for treating NSCLC in the early stages of the disease. It is believed that with the novel engineering avenues of nanomedicine, there is a possibility to overcome the inherent limitations derived from conventional and emerging treatments, such as off-site drug cytotoxicity, drug resistance, and administration methods. Combining nanotechnology with the convergence points of current therapies could open up new avenues for meeting the unmet needs of NSCLC treatment.

Research progress of extracellular vesicles as biomarkers in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is one of the most severe forms of malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, of which non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most primary type observed in the clinic. NSCLC is mainly treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Additionally, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have also shown promising results. Several immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been developed for clinical use and have benefited patients with NSCLC. However, immunotherapy faces several challenges like poor response and unknown effective population. It is essential to identify novel predictive markers to further advance precision immunotherapy for NSCLC. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) present an important research direction. In this review, we focus on the role of EVs as a biomarker in NSCLC immunotherapy considering various perspectives, including the definition and properties of EVs, their role as biomarkers in current NSCLC immunotherapy, and different EV components as biomarkers in NSCLC immunotherapy research. We describe the cross-talk between the role of EVs as biomarkers and novel technical approaches or research concepts in NSCLC immunotherapy, such as neoadjuvants, multi-omics analysis, and the tumour microenvironment. This review will provide a reference for future research to improve the benefits of immunotherapy for patients with NSCLC.

PD-L1 and PD-L2 immune checkpoint protein induction by type III interferon in non-small cell lung cancer cells

IntroductionDespite the clinical success of PD-1/PD-1-ligand immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the appearance of primary and acquired therapy resistance is a major challenge reflecting that the mechanisms regulating the expression of the PD-1-ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 are not fully explored. Type I and II interferons (IFNs) induce PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Here, we examined if PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression also can be induced by type III IFN, IFN-λ, which is peculiarly important for airway epithelial surfaces. MethodsIn silico mRNA expression analysis of PD-L1 (CD274), PD-L2 (PDCD1LG2), and IFN- λ signaling signature genes in NSCLC tumors and cell lines was performed using RNA sequencing expression data from TCGA, OncoSG, and DepMap portals. IFN-λ-mediated induction of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in NSCLC cell lines was examined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. ResultsIFNL genes encoding IFN- λ variants are expressed in the majority of NSCLC tumors and cell lines along with the IFNLR1 and IL10R2 genes encoding the IFN-λ receptor subunits. The expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 mRNA is higher in NSCLC tumors with IFNL mRNA expression compared to tumors without IFNL expression. In the NSCLC cell line HCC827, stimulation with IFN-λ induced both an increase in PD-L1 and PD-L2 mRNA expression and cell surface abundance of the corresponding proteins. In the NSCLC cell line A427, displaying a low basal expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 mRNA and corresponding proteins, stimulation with IFN-λ resulted in an induction of the former. ConclusionThe type III IFN, IFN- λ, is capable of inducing PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression, at least in some NSCLC cells, and this regulation will need acknowledgment in the development of new diagnostic procedures, such as gene expression signature profiles, to improve PD-1/PD-1-ligand immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Multi-omic and spatial dissection of immunotherapy response groups in non-small cell lung cancer.

The composition and activation status of the cellular milieu contained within the tumour microenvironment (TME) is becoming increasingly recognized as a driving factor for immunotherapy response. Here, we employed multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC), and digital spatial profiling (DSP) to capture the targeted immune proteome and transcriptome of tumour and TME compartments from an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated (n = 41) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient cohort. We demonstrate by mIHC that the interaction of CD68+ macrophages with PD1+ , FoxP3+ cells is enriched in ICI refractory tumours (p = 0.012). Patients responsive to ICI therapy expressed higher levels of IL2 receptor alpha (CD25, p = 0.028) within their tumour compartments, which corresponded with increased IL2 mRNA (p = 0.001) within their stroma. In addition, stromal IL2 mRNA levels positively correlated with the expression of pro-apoptotic markers cleaved caspase 9 (p = 2e-5 ) and BAD (p = 5.5e-4 ) and negatively with levels of memory marker, CD45RO (p = 7e-4 ). Immuno-inhibitory markers CTLA-4 (p = 0.021) and IDO-1 (p = 0.023) were suppressed in ICI-responsive patients. Tumour expression of CD44 was depleted in the responsive patients (p = 0.02), while higher stromal expression of one of its ligands, SPP1 (p = 0.008), was observed. Cox survival analysis also indicated tumour CD44 expression was associated with poorer prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.61, p = 0.01), consistent with its depletion in ICI-responsive patients. Through multi-modal approaches, we have dissected the characteristics of NSCLC immunotherapy treatment groups and provide evidence for the role of several markers including IL2, CD25, CD44 and SPP1 in the efficacy of current generations of ICI therapy.

Integrative analyses of bulk and single-cell RNA-seq identified cancer-associated fibroblasts-related signature as a prognostic factor for immunotherapy in NSCLC.

An emerging view regarding cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) is that it plays a critical role in tumorigenesis and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (TME), but the clinical significance and biological functions of CAFs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still poorly explored. Here, we aimed to identify the CAF-related signature for NSCLC through integrative analyses of bulk and single-cell genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics profiling. Using CAF marker genes identified in weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), we constructed and validated a CAF-based risk model that stratifies patients into two prognostic groups from four independent NSCLC cohorts. The high-score group exhibits a higher abundance of CAFs, decreased immune cell infiltration, increased epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), activated transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling, and a limited survival rate compared with the low-score group. Considering the immunosuppressive feature in the high-score group, we speculated an inferior clinical response for immunotherapy in these patients, and this association was successfully verified in two NSCLC cohorts treated with immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs). Furthermore, single-cell RNA sequence datasets were used to clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying the aggressive and immunosuppressive phenotype in the high-score group. We found that one of the genes in the risk model, filamin binding LIM protein 1 (FBLIM1), is mainly expressed in fibroblasts and upregulated in CAFs compared to fibroblasts from normal tissue. FBLIM1-positive CAF subtype was correlated with increased TGFβ expression, higher mesenchymal marker level, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Finally, we demonstrated that FBLIM1might serve as a poor prognostic marker for immunotherapy in clinical samples. In conclusion, we identified a novel CAF-based classifier with prognostic value in NSCLC patients and those treated with ICBs. Single-cell transcriptome profiling uncovered FBLIM1-positive CAFs as an aggressive subtype with a high abundance of TGFβ, EMT, and an immunosuppressive phenotype in NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond first-line progression with prior immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunotherapy, monotherapy, and immunotherapy plus platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with negative driver genes. However, the impact of similar continuing immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP) of first-line immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC has not yet been shown. This study aimed to estimate the impact of immunotherapy beyond first-line progression (IBF) and evaluate the factors associated with second-line efficacity. Ninety-four cases of advanced NSCLC patients with progressive disease (PD) post first-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and administrated prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between November 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were applied to determine predictive factors independently associated with second-line efficacity. A total of 94 patients were incorporated in this study. Patients who continued the original ICIs after initial PD were defined as IBF (n=42), whereas those who discontinued immunotherapy were defined as non-IBF (n=52). The second-line objective response rates (ORR, ORR = CR + PR) of patients in the IBF and non-IBF groups were 13.5% vs. 28.6%, respectively (P=0.070). No significant survival difference was found between patients in the IBF and non-IBF groups in first-line median progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS1, 6.2 vs. 5.1 months, P=0.490), second-line median PFS (mPFS2, 4.5 vs. 2.6 months, P=0.216), or median overall survival (OS) (mOS, 14.4 vs. 8.3 months, P=0.188). However, the benefits inPFS2 were observed in individuals performed PFS1 >6 months (group A) than those of PFS1 ≤6 months (group B) (median PFS2, 4.6 vs. 3.2 months, P=0.038). Multivariate analyses did not reveal any independent prognostic factors for efficacy. The benefits of continuing prior ICIs administration beyond first-line immunotherapy progression might not be obvious in patients with advanced NSCLC, but those first line treatment showed a longer period may receive efficacy benefits.

Examination of the Functional Relationship between PD-L1 DNA Methylation and mRNA Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy targeting the interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a treatment option for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The expression of PD-L1 by the NSCLC cells determines treatment effectiveness, but the relationship between PD-L1 DNA methylation and expression has not been clearly described. We investigated PD-L1 DNA methylation, mRNA expression, and protein expression in NSCLC cell lines and tumor biopsies. We used clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) to modify PD-L1 genetic contexts and endonuclease deficient Cas9 (dCas9) fusions with ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase 1 (TET1) and DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) to manipulate PD-L1 DNA methylation. In NSCLC cell lines, we identified specific PD-L1 CpG sites with methylation levels inversely correlated with PD-L1 mRNA expression. However, inducing PD-L1 mRNA expression with interferon-γ did not decrease the methylation level for these CpG sites, and using CRISPR-Cas9, we found that the CpG sites did not directly confer a negative regulation. dCas9-TET1 and dCas9-DNMT3A could induce PD-L1 hypo- and hyper-methylation, respectively, with the latter conferring a decrease in expression showing the functional impact of methylation. In NSCLC biopsies, the inverse correlation between the methylation and expression of PD-L1 was weak. We conclude that there is a regulatory link between PD-L1 DNA methylation and expression. However, since these measures are weakly associated, this study highlights the need for further research before PD-L1 DNA methylation can be implemented as a biomarker and drug target for measures to improve the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Incorporating risk preferences of patients in the valuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunotherapy offers a distinctive mechanism of action compared to traditional treatments, arising from additional value dimensions that may not be captured in standard health technology assessments. Cancer patients may have the expectation that immunotherapy provides durable, long-term survival gains. Moreover, some patients may be willing to take a 'risk' to undergo immunotherapy to achieve better survival outcomes. We reviewed quantitative methods that explored patients' risk preferences in their non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment choices, in PubMed (MEDLINE), from January 1, 2015, until July 1, 2022. The consideration of a value dimension ('hope') based on patients' risk-seeking preferences is specifically addressed for the valuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC. We reported that the quantitative methods that aim to measure patients' risk preferences or 'hope' empirically are emerging. Value assessments should not only comprise survival improvements for the mean or median patient but also consider methods that reflect durable, long-term overall survival gains for risk-seeking patients. However, the published evidence for incorporating 'hope' based on patients' stated preferences for uncertain treatment profiles is not strong, and future research could strengthen this evidence base. We encourage further research on the development and validation of quantification methods to incorporate 'hope' and risk preferences of patients treated with immunotherapy for NSCLC and beyond.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Worldwide, lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80 to 85% of all lung cancers. Recently, a few studies have reported the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC. However, no meta-analysis comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemoimmunotherapy has yet been reported. We perform a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC. The statement of preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols will be used as guidelines for reporting the present review protocol. Original clinical randomized controlled trials assessing the beneficial effects and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC will be included. Databases searched include China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Wanfang Database, China Biological Medicine Database, PubMed, EMBASE Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Cochrane Collaboration's tool is used to assess the risk of bias in included randomized controlled trials. All calculations are carried out with Stata 11.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be publicly available and published in a peer-reviewed journal. This evidence will be useful to practitioners, patients, and health policy-makers regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC.

Targeting tumor microenvironment for non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is composed of different cellular and non-cellular elements. Constant interactions between tumor cells and the TME are responsible for tumor initiation, tumor progression, and responses to therapies. Immune cells in the TME can be classified into two broad categories, namely adaptive and innate immunity. Targeting these immune cells has attracted substantial research and clinical interest. Current research focuses on identifying key molecular players and developing targeted therapies. These approaches may offer more efficient ways of treating different cancers. In this review, we explore the heterogeneity of the TME in non-small cell lung cancer, summarize progress made in targeting the TME in preclinical and clinical studies, discuss the potential predictive value of the TME in immunotherapy, and highlight the promising effects of bispecific antibodies in the era of immunotherapy.

Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

To discuss the efficacy and potential prognostic factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the medical history of patients (n=111) confirmed with advanced NSCLC in the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from 2018 to 2020. All enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma (n=69), squamous cell carcinoma (n=28), and other types of lung cancer (n=14) were treated with the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. They were divided into groups of PD-1 inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy, and PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy and angiogenesis inhibitors according to the treatment regimen. General clinical data of all patients were collected, and the Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze prognostic factors associated with PFS and OS after treatment. Of 111 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs, 6 were fully responsive, 33 were partially responsive, 55 were stable, and 17 were progressive. There was no significant difference in objective response rate between the 3 groups. In the subgroup analysis according to the lines of therapy, the objective response rate of patients receiving first-line treatment was 46.7%, which was significantly higher than that of other line treatment groups ( P =0.014). The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the history of hormone use (HR=1.593; P =0.033), second-line or further lines of therapy (HR=2.871; P <0.001), and high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR; HR=1.498; P =0.045) were independent risk factors for PFS after immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC. And the history of hormone use (HR=1.518; P =0.015) and high NLR (HR=3.053; P =0.001) were as well the independent risk factors for OS after immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC. ICIs therapy clearly had a greater survival benefit in patients who received first-line therapy, had no history of hormone use, and showed low NLR after initial treatment. ICIs can be an effective treatment for advanced NSCLC.

Adjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A new milestone.

Currently, chemotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgery has been shown to improve 5-year survival rates by only 4-5%. Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of advanced NSCLC, there is a growing interest in the role of immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC. Here, we summarize the rationale for adjuvant immunotherapy, including the postoperative immunosuppressive environment and immunological effects of platinum chemotherapy. Many ongoing clinical trials and the related progress in adjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage resectable NSCLC are discussed. Furthermore, we highlight several unresolved challenges, including markers predictive of treatment benefit, the efficacy of treatment for some oncogene-addicted tumors, the optimal combination therapy, the duration of adjuvant immunotherapy, and optimal selection between neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy. Early findings in some clinical trials are promising, and updated overall survival results will be useful for validating the current role of adjuvant immunotherapy, particularly in the context of perioperative strategy.

Progress and perspectives of perioperative immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Lung cancer mortality has decreased over the past decade, which is partly attributed to improved treatments. Curative surgery for patients with early-stage lung cancer is the standard of care, but not all surgical treatments have a good prognosis. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are used to improve the prognosis of patients with resectable lung cancer. Immunotherapy, an epoch-defining treatment, has improved curative effects, prognosis, and tolerability compared with traditional and ordinary cytotoxic chemotherapy, providing new hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy-related clinical trials have reported encouraging clinical outcomes in their exploration of different types of perioperative immunotherapy, from neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, neoadjuvant immune-combination therapy (chemoimmunotherapy, immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy plus radiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy), adjuvant immunotherapy, and neoadjuvant combined adjuvant immunotherapy. Phase 3 studies such as IMpower 010 and CheckMate 816 reported survival benefits of perioperative immunotherapy for operable patients. This review summarizes up-to-date clinical studies and analyzes the efficiency and feasibility of different neoadjuvant therapies and biomarkers to identify optimal types of perioperative immunotherapy for NSCLC.