Immunotherapy Group Research Articles

Dynamic immune signatures of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer for infection prediction after immunotherapy.

Pulmonary infections are a crucial health concern for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether the clinical outcome of pulmonary infection is influenced by immunotherapy(IO) remains unclear. By evaluating immune signatures, this study investigated the post-immunotherapy risk of pulmonary infection in patients with lung cancer and identified circulating biomarkers that predict post-immunotherapy infection. Blood specimens were prospectively collected from patients with NSCLC before and after chemotherapy(C/T) and/or IO to explore dynamic changes in immune signatures. Real-world clinical data were extracted from medical records for outcome evaluation. Mass cytometry and ELISA were employed to analyze immune signatures and cytokine profiles to reveal potential correlations between immune profiles and the risk of infection. The retrospective cohort included 283 patients with advanced NSCLC. IO was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (odds ratio=0.46, p=0.012). Patients receiving IO and remained pneumonia-free exhibited the most favorable survival outcomes compared with those who received C/T or developed pneumonia (p<0.001). The prospective cohort enrolled 30 patients. The proportion of circulating NK cells significantly increased after treatment in IO alone (p<0.001) and C/T+IO group (p<0.01). An increase in cell densities of circulating PD-1+CD8+(cytotoxic) T cells (p<0.01) and PD-1+CD4+ T cells (p<0.01) were observed in C/T alone group after treatment. In IO alone group, a decrease in cell densities of TIM-3+ and PD-1+ cytotoxic T cells (p<0.05), and PD-1+CD4+ T cells (p<0.01) were observed after treatment. In C/T alone and C/T+IO groups, cell densities of circulating PD-1+ cytotoxic T cells significantly increased in patients with pneumonia after treatment(p<0.05). However, in IO alone group, cell density of PD-1+ cytotoxic T cells significantly decreased in patients without pneumonia after treatment (p<0.05). TNF-α significantly increased after treatment with IO alone (p<0.05) but decreased after C/T alone (p<0.01). Our results indicate that the incorporation of immunotherapy into treatment regimens may potentially offer protective effects against pulmonary infection. Protective effects are associated with reduction of exhausted T-cells and augmentation of TNF-α and NK cells. Exhausted T cells, NK cells, and TNF-α may play crucial roles in immune responses against infections. These observations highlight the potential utility of certain circulating biomarkers, particularly exhausted T cells, for predicting post-treatment infections.

SBRT with ipilimumab and nivolumab to metastatic MSS colorectal and pancreatic cancer: A pooled analysis of four prospective phase II trials.

752 Background: The role of immunotherapy (IO) in microsatellite stable (MSS) pancreatic and colorectal cancer is limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used in the limited metastatic setting, however its use with IO remains an area of investigation for both target response and overall systemic response. Here we evaluate the local failure rate of irradiated target lesions with and without IO. Methods: We pooled four prospective phase II single-arm studies of patients with metastatic MSS colorectal or pancreatic cancer treated with SBRT alone or with IO. Those in the first study (NCT01239381) received ablative liver SBRT to a maximum biologically effective dose (BED) of 48-100 Gy. Patients in the remaining studies received low dose SBRT to liver, lung, or nodal metastases with 24 Gy in 3 fractions to a BED of 43.2 Gy in combination with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab during the first (NCT04361162, NCT04575922) or second (NCT03104439) cycles. Local failure rates at the time of first progression were estimated by the cumulative incidence with non-target progression only and death as competing risks and compared using Gray’s test. The best response at the target was measured with the RECIST 1.1 criteria using the largest reduction in target size during follow up. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to compare target size and percentage of tumor reduction. Results: Across all four studies there were 154 evaluable patients including 50 who received ablative SBRT and 104 patients who received low dose SBRT with IO. There were 92 patients with colorectal and 62 with pancreatic cancer. Median target size was 3.7 cm in the ablative SBRT group and 2.8 cm in the IO group (P=0.04). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year local failure rates were 10%, 18%, and 20% respectively following ablative SBRT and 24%, 25%, and 26% following low dose SBRT with IO (P=0.32). The ORR was 50.0% with SBRT alone and 23.1% with the addition of IO (P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the DCR (80.0% vs. 68.3%, P=0.18). The percent decrease in size was significantly higher in those with ablative SBRT (median -53.0% vs. -10.6%, p=0.02). There was no difference in the percent tumor response with respect to primary tumor type (P=0.13), KRAS (P=0.11) or TP53 (P=0.27) status. Conclusions: Despite the use of low dose SBRT with immune checkpoint inhibitors, there was no significant difference in local failure rates compared to ablative SBRT. Ablative SBRT dosing yielded a significantly higher depth of response. As clinical and preclinical studies suggest liver metastases are less responsive to IO, understanding dose and fractionation schemas for optimal local control is critical. Further studies are needed to explore the radiation dose with regards to local control when delivered with IO.

Survival benefit of combined immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer: an analysis based on the SEER database.

While simultaneous chemoradiotherapy remains the established therapeutic modality for patients afflicted with locally advanced esophageal cancer, the effectiveness of this radical approach falls short of the desired outcome. Numerous investigations have illuminated the prospect of enhancing therapeutic efficacy through the amalgamation of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapeutic interventions. Consequently, we embarked on an examination to scrutinize the potential survival advantages conferred by the confluence of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in relation to locally advanced unresectable esophageal carcinoma, drawing upon the extensive SEER database for our analysis. We extracted clinicopathological attributes and survival statistics of patients afflicted with locally advanced unresectable esophageal carcinoma, diagnosed within the temporal span encompassing the years 2004-2014 and 2019-2020, from the extensive SEER database. To discern disparities in both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the cohorts subjected to chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy alone, we employed analytical tools such as Kaplan-Meier analysis, the Log-rank test, the Cox regression proportional risk model, and propensity-matched score (PSM) methodology. A total of 7,758 eligible patients were encompassed in this research, with 6,395 individuals having undergone chemoradiotherapy alone, while 1,363 patients received the combined treatment of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy. After 1:4 propensity score matching, 6,447 patients were successfully harmonized, yielding a well-balanced cohort. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a substantial enhancement in OS (P = 0.0091) and CSS (P < 0.001) for the group subjected to chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy as compared to chemoradiotherapy alone. Further multivariable analysis with PSM confirmed that chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy benefits OS(HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98) and CSS (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.76). In addition, Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses of the matched patient groups unveiled several independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, including sex, age, marital status, tumor location, tumor size, pathologic grade, SEER historic staging, and treatment modality. Among these factors, being female, married, and receiving chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy emerged as independent protective factors, while age exceeding 75 years, non-superior segment tumor location, tumor size greater than 6cm, Grade 3-4 pathology, and regional SEER historic staging were all found to be independent risk factors. The survival advantage of the chemoradiotherapy combined with the immunotherapy group over the chemoradiotherapy alone group was substantial. This investigation furnishes compelling evidence that the integration of immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy confers a noteworthy survival advantage when contrasted with conventional chemoradiotherapy for individuals grappling with locally advanced unresectable esophageal carcinoma.

Applying Untargeted Lipidomics to Evaluate the Efficacy of Combined Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma Treatment.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis due to insidious symptoms that make early diagnosis difficult. Despite the combination of multiple treatment modalities, the recurrence and mortality rates of ESCC remain high. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy is an emerging treatment modality that improves the prognosis of patients with ESCC. However, owing to the presence of hyperprogression and pseudoprogression, the currently used methods cannot accurately evaluate the efficacy of this therapy in patients, thus creating an evaluation bias and depriving these patients of the opportunity to benefit. We used untargeted lipidomics to identify the differences in lipid composition between cancer specimens and normal tissue specimens in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with the immunotherapy group and the surgery-alone group of esophageal cancer patients and constructed a prediction model based on sphingomyelin 12:1;2O/30:0 and triglyceride (TG) 60:3 | TG 18:0_24:1_18 using a machine learning approach, which helps to better evaluate the neoadjuvant efficacy of combination therapy and better guide the treatment of ESCC.

Combination of radiotherapy and Anlotinib enhances benefit from immunotherapy to liver metastasis and abscopal tumor from lung cancer

Many studies have shown that liver metastasis can weaken the efficacy of immunotherapy. Immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy has been proven to have synergistic anti-tumor effects. So we devote to explore whether the combination of the three therapies can exert effective anti-tumor effects on liver metastasis. The clinical information of 118 patients with liver metastasis were collected to compare the intrahepatic progression-free survival between immunotherapy and immunotherapy combined with other treatments. We used Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cell to establish a mouse liver metastasis tumor model and record tumor burden and survival. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells detected by flow cytometry. RNA sequencing was performed and the proportion of immune cells were analyzed by TIMER2.0 database. Compared with immunotherapy group, the combination therapy group showed a trend for longer median intrahepatic progression-free survival. Radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor and Anlotinib can inhibit liver metastasis and subcutaneous tumor growth and prolong the survival compared with other groups in vivo. Compared with the anti-PD-1 treatment group, triple therapy can increase CD4+T, CD8+T, and IFN-γ+CD8+T cells and decrease infiltration of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) in tumors. PPAR signaling pathway were significantly activated and CD8+T and dendritic cells (DC) were increased in the triple therapy group compared to the PD-1 inhibitor combined with Anlotinib group. Radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor and Anlotinib can effectively exert anti-tumor efficacy and reshape the tumor immune microenvironment by increasing the infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells and reducing the infiltration of immunosuppressive immune cells.

Immunotherapy with autologous dendritic cells in the complex treatment of malignant gliomas - results.

Malignant gliomas are the most common primary brain tumor. Despite the variety of modern treatments, it is still a fatal disease with an extremely poor prognosis. The use of immunotherapy as a technique for the treatment of malignant tumors has great promise, retraining and exploiting the patient's immune response against tumors. Evaluation of the effectiveness of dendritic cell vaccine in patients with malignant brain gliomas in the structure of complex treatment in comparison with the control group of patients without immunotherapy in the structure of treatment. In a single-center, prospective, cohort study, taking place on the basis of the RNSI named after prof. A.L. Polenov, 91 patients with morphologically established malignant glial tumor (glioblastoma) took part. The main group of 41 patients who, in addition to standard treatment (surgical, radiation and chemotherapy), underwent specific antitumor immunotherapy. 50 patients received only standard treatment, without immunotherapy. Median survival was 21.7 months in the immunotherapy group (95% CI 4-37 months) and 15.8 months (95% CI 3-22 months) in the non-immunotherapy group (p = 0.002). The median relapse-free period in the group with immunotherapy was 13.8 months (95% CI 1-20 months), and in the group without immunotherapy 7.9 months (95% CI 1-12 months) (p = 0.003). In general, the use of immunotherapy in the structure of complex treatment of patients with malignant gliomas demonstrates a clear positive trend in terms of overall survival and median relapse-free period. But nevertheless, immunotherapy requires further development as a therapeutic tool, study and improvement, which will take into account immunosuppression in malignant gliomas and means of overcoming it, optimization in terms of target antigen selection, cell preparation and integration of dendritic vaccines into other treatment regimens.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Treatment Options for Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

As monotherapy such as topotecan has reached a plateau of effectiveness, new second-line treatments based on experience have been used in clinical application. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different second-line treatments for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). A total of 380 patients with advanced SCLC were screened selectively in the retrospective study. Adverse events and patient responses were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors v1.1. The progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method or Cox survival regression model and compared using the log-rank test. In the platinum-resistant group, disease control rate (DCR) and median PFS (mPFS) were prolonged in the combination group versus single-agent group (DCR: 49.24% vs 24.39%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.73 vs 1.90 months, P < .001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .683). The mPFS did not differ among single-agent groups (P = .380). No significant difference was observed in mPFS of different combination therapy groups (P = .170). In terms of platinum-based chemotherapy, the DCR and mPFS were prolonged in irinotecan-platinum group versus taxol-platinum group (DCR: 56.14% vs 9.09%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.87 vs 1.93 months, P = .012). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .614). The mPFS was prolonged in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy group versus single-agent chemotherapy group (P = .003). In the platinum-sensitive group, the mPFS did not differ between the combination group and single-agent group (P = .200). The mPFS did not differ among different single-agent groups (P = .260) or combination groups (P = .150). There was no difference in mPFS among different platinum-based chemotherapy groups (P = .830). For patients with platinum-resistant SCLC, combination therapy has shown better efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile than monotherapy. Among combination therapies, irinotecan-platinum has shown better efficacy than taxol-platinum. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC, the efficacy of different single-agent or combination therapies was similar.

Can rectal MRI and endorectal ultrasound accurately predict the complete response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy for rectal cancer?

Standardized assessments of clinical complete response (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer have been established, but their utility and accuracy remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) for the determination of cCRs after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and to investigate the concordance between cCR and pathological complete response (pCR). Ninety-four patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy were included. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each evaluation method were calculated. Combined MRI and ERUS assessments found cCR in seven of the 94 patients in our cohort. In the non-immunotherapy group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI for diagnosing cCR were 50.0%, 85.2%, and 77.1%, respectively, whereas those of ERUS were 50.0%, 92.6%, and 82.9%, respectively; those of combined MRI and ERUS were 25.0%, 96.3%, and 87.5%, respectively. In the immunotherapy group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with which MRI identified CR were 51.7%, 76.7%, and 64.4%, respectively; those of ERUS were 13.8%, 90.0%, and 52.5%, respectively, and those of combined MRI and ERUS were 10.3%, 96.7%, and 54.2%, respectively. We also found that 32 of 37 patients with pCR did not meet the cCR evaluation criteria. Of these pCR patients, 78.4% (29/37) received immunotherapy. In the entire cohort, there were five pCRs among the seven cCRs. Of the four cCRs that occurred in the immunotherapy group, three were pCRs. Rectal MRI and/or ERUS did not provide sufficiently accurate assessments of cCR in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy, especially immunotherapy, and cCR did not predict pCR.

Immunotherapy in rectal cancer patients-a propensity score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Rectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are candidates for immunotherapy. However, there is little evidence on its effect on overall survival (OS). Retrospective analysis of stage II-IV rectal adenocarcinoma patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2010 and 2019. Propensity score matching was adjusted for baseline and treatment confounders. The cohort was divided into patients who received immunotherapy and matched controls. The primary outcome was OS. 5175/206,615 (2.5%) patients withrectal adenocarcinoma underwent immunotherapy. These patients were younger (58 vs 62years; p < 0.001), more often male (64.4% vs 61.7%; p < 0.001),were more likely to haveprivate insurance (50.8% vs 43.4%; p < 0.001), more metastatic disease at presentation (clinical TNM stage IV-80.8% vs 23.3%; p < 0.001), presented with larger tumors (median: 5cm vs. 4.2cm; p < 0.001) and less often underwent surgery (33.7% vs. 69.9%; p < 0.001), radiation therapy (21.5% vs 57.4%; p < 0.001), and standard chemotherapy (38.1% vs 61%; p < 0.001) than controls. After matching, 488 patients were in each group. OS was significantly shorter in the immunotherapy group (mean survival: 56.4months (95% CI:-53.03-59.86)) compared to controls (mean survival: 70.5months (95%CI:-66.15-74.92) (p = 0.004)). Cox regression analysis of factors associated with OS demonstrated that immunotherapy was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.16; 95%CI: 2.09-2.24; p < 0.001). After clinical staging stratification, immunotherapy was associated with improved OS in stage IV (HR 0.91, 95%CI: 0.88-0.95; p < 0.001) but lower survival in stage II (HR 2.38; 95%CI: 2.05-2.77; p < 0.001) and stage III (HR 2.43; 95%CI: 2.18-2.7; p < 0.001) patients. Immunotherapy showed modest increase in OS in stage IV metastatic rectal cancer. OS was significantly lower in stage II-III disease treated with immunotherapy.

Preliminary evidence for endoscopic surgery combined with postoperative anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroudEndoscopic surgery can be used as the main treatment for advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC). However, there is a huge clinical controversy about the need for consolidated immunotherapy after surgery.MethodsWe performed a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis (1:2) of patients with locally advanced rNPC who underwent endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) combined with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monotherapy or ENPG alone. The survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Potential surgical-related complications and immune-related adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.ResultsWe recruited 10 patients receiving ENPG plus anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 20 receiving ENPG alone. During the mean follow-up of 23.8 months, a significant improvement in the 2-year PFS was detected in the consolidation immunotherapy group compared to the ENPG alone group (80.0% vs. 40.0%; HR = 0.258; 95% CI: 0.09–0.72; p = 0.04), while the 2-year OS in the consolidation immunotherapy group was not significantly longer than that in the ENPG alone group (90.0% vs. 75.0%; HR = 0.482; 95% CI: 0.08–3.00; p = 0.50). The incidence of surgical-related complications in the consolidation immunotherapy group and ENPG alone group was 70.0 and 60.0%, respectively. Immune-related AEs were similar between the toripalimab arm (75.0%) and the camrelizumab arm (66.7%). Surgical-related complications depend on symptomatic treatments. Immune-related AEs were mild and tolerable.ConclusionsConsolidation immunotherapy regimen for patients with advanced rNPC after ENPG compared to ENPG alone provides a superior PFS rate with a manageable safety profile.

10021-IMT-1 A ROLE OF DENDRITIC CELL IMMUNOTHERAPY AS A MODALITY IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY THERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract We are conducting a clinical study of immunotherapy using tumor-fused dendritic cells (TFDC) as a modality of multidisciplinary treatment for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we analyzed the additional effect of TFDC-immunotherapy for standard therapy. Newly diagnose GBM patients who treated at four of Jikei University Hospitals were analyzed in this study. Adjuvant therapy after tumor removal surgery was maintained according to the Supp's regimen. Bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) was added when a recurred tumor was confirmed. TFDC vaccine was generated from cultured tumor cells derived from autologous surgical specimen and dendritic cells from peripheral blood, and were subcutaneously administered in the cervical region for 3-14 times. All patients who had not participated in any other immunotherapy-related clinical studies were compared as a control group in a Propensity score matching analysis. The number of analyzed patients was 55 in the immunotherapy group and 35 in the control group. The 2-year survival rate and 5-year survival rate were 20.9% and 0% in the control group, respectively, while the immunotherapy group was 45.7% and 22.7%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed between them (p=0.0045). There was no difference in the observed adverse events in the two groups. Specific adverse events for TFDC-immunotherapy was not observed. In the biomarker analysis, low HLA-A expression and lack of CCDC88A, KRT4, TACC2, and TONSL mutations in tumor cells were suggested as biomarkers of better prognosis. We are currently analyzing IDH profile in those patients for further analysis. TFDC-immunotherapy should be adopted as one of the modality of multidisciplinary treatments for GBM because it is expected to have some additional effects for standard therapeutic reagents without adversely affecting them. Since there are a certain number of poor responders for this immunotherapy, predictive biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy are awaited.

Efficacy of different regimens and prognostic factors in patients with first relapsed multiple myeloma treated after front-line bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of second-line regimens and prognostic factors in patients with first-relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (BCD). Methods: A retrospective cohort study. Clinical data were collected in first-relapsed MM patients after BCD treatment from three tertiary hospitals in north China from July 2009 to October 2022. Patients were classified according to the second-line regimen into the immunotherapy group, single novel agent group [either proteasome inhibitor (PI) or immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)], combination treatment group (both PI+IMiD), and traditional treatment group. Responses to second-line regimens and survival data were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and the Cox proportional risk model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 217 patients were enrolled including 8.8% (19/217) in the immunotherapy group, 48.4% (105/217) in the PI/IMiD group, 29.9% (65/217) in the PI+IMiD group, and 12.9% (28/217) in the traditional treatment group. The median age was 62 years (range 31-83 years) and 56.2% (122/217) were males. The overall response rates (ORRs) in the four groups were 94.7% (18/19) vs. 56.2% (59/105) vs. 73.8% (48/65) vs. 32.1% (9/28) (χ2=24.55; P<0.001), respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the second-line regimens (2ndPFS) was 17.7 vs. 9.0 vs. 9.2 vs. 4.6 months (χ2=22.74; P<0.001), respectively, among which patients in the PI/IMiD and PI+IMiD groups had comparable 2ndPFS (χ2=1.76; P=0.923). Patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) achieved the longest 2ndPFS of 22.0 months in the immunotherapy group (χ2=15.03; P=0.002). Multivariate analysis suggested that immunotherapy (HR=0.11, 95%CI 0.05-0.27), achievement of efficacy of partial response or better (HR=0.47, 95%CI 0.34-0.66), and non-aggressive relapse (HR=0.25, 95%CI 0.17-0.37) were independent prognostic factors of 2ndPFS. Conclusion: In this real-world study, immunotherapy was associated with a more favorable efficacy and PFS for first-relapsed MM patients after BCD treatment, with similar outcomes in patients with HRCAs.

Adjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with cholangiocarcinoma after radical resection.

The malignancy of cholangiocarcinoma is highly pronounced, and it exhibits a propensity for recurrence and metastasis even in the presence of standard chemotherapy. The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with resected cholangiocarcinoma needs to be substantiated. Data from 101 patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2015 and 2020 were studied. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients in the combined adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy group (AC + IM group) and the adjuvant chemotherapy alone group (AC group) (all p > 0.05). The AC + IM group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to the AC group (p = 0.032). Likewise, the AC + IM group exhibited a significantly superior overall survival (OS) outcome when compared to the AC group (p = 0.044). Multivariate Cox analysis unveiled perineural invasion (p = 0.041), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.006), and postoperative immunotherapy (p = 0.008) as independent prognostic factors exerting a significant impact on the OS of patients. In the cohort of patients with perineural invasion, the AC + IM group exhibited significantly improved OS compared to the AC group (p = 0.0077). Similarly, within the subset of patients with lymph node metastasis, the AC + IM group exhibited a significantly superior OS outcome when compared to the AC group (p = 0.023). Combining postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy extends the RFS and OS of patients with cholangiocarcinoma following radical resection.

Treatment Selection and Clinical Outcomes in Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) - a Single Center Analysis

Introduction: Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is as an indolent neoplasm of B-lymphocytes with plasmacytic differentiation causing bone marrow infiltration along with variable involvement of lymph nodes/or spleen. Most common subtype of LPL, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) involves IgM monoclonal gammopathy of any concentration. Due to widespread availability of targeted therapy drugs (BTKi), the treatment landscape of LPL is changing. The aim of this study is to analyze disease characteristics, patterns of real-world treatment selection and its impact on clinical outcomes (Objective response rate (ORR), Progression free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients (age ≥18 years) with diagnosis of LPL/WM between January 1, 2003, to March 31, 2023, seen in consultation at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center was performed. ORR (CR, VGPR, PR and MR) was calculated according to response criteria at 6 th International Workshop for WM. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). OS and PFS were reported using standard Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariate cox regression modeling was used to assess associations between first line regimen and survival outcomes (OS / PFS). Predictor variables, namely age at diagnosis, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, and rIPSS (revised International Prognostic Score System) were included in multivariable models. Results: A total of 127 patients were included in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range 41 to 88), of which 75 (59.1%) were men. Majority of the population was White (n=112, 88.2%) and had ECOG of 0 (n=70, 67.3%). Monoclonal gammopathy of IgM subtype was present in 114 (94.2%), IgG in 3 (2.5%) and IgA in 1 (0.8%) patient. MYD88 mutation testing was positive in 69.8%, negative in 14% and unknown in 16.3% patients. Two out of 10 patients tested for CXCR4 mutation were positive. Sixteen (28.1%) patients had hyperviscosity symptoms and underwent plasmapheresis with first line treatment. These patients had a mean IgM level of 6249.5 mg/dL and mean M-spike of 4.53 g/dL. Of 121 patients with data on treatment strategy, 20 (16.5%) were monitored with observation alone. The most common treatment modality used in first line was chemo-immunotherapy (C-I) in 61 (50.4%) patients followed by Rituximab immunotherapy (R-I) in 20 (16.5%) patients and BTK inhibitors in 12 (9.9%) patients. ORR was highest 90.7% (39/43) in chemoimmunotherapy group, 87.5% (7/8) in BTKi group and 71.4% (10/14) in Immunotherapy group. Bendamustine-Rituximab was the most common used treatment regimen (n=42), with resultant CR in 20% and VGPR in 23.3% patients. At median follow-up duration of 36.9 months, median OS was 113.9 months in R-I, 159.8 months in C-I and not reached (NR) in BTKi group. The median PFS was 50.2 months in R-I, 61.2 in C-I and 23 months in BTKi group. Although Multivariate Cox Regression analysis failed to show statistically significant difference in PFS, there is tendency towards improved OS in C-I group (p=0.08) among all the groups when adjusted for age, sex, CCI. Conclusion: In our single center experience, chemoimmunotherapy combination with Bendamustine-Rituximab is the most used treatment choice in first line settings followed by single agent anti-CD20 therapy and BTKi. Although Multivariate Cox Regression analysis failed to show statistically significant difference in PFS, there is a tendency towards improved OS in the chemoimmunotherapy subgroup (p=0.08). The shorter PFS in BTKi group is likely due to toxicity of targeted therapy leading to treatment interruption and change of therapy.

Retrospective and Observational Study on CAR-T 19 Bridge Therapies in Pediatric, Adolescents and Young Adults

INTRODUCTION CAR-T therapy has revolutionized the treatment of B-ALL. The development of CAR-T therapy is a long and delicate process where once apheresis is done, a bridge period that least until CAR-T cells are infused starts. Meanwhile, the objective will be to maintain disease control, decrease tumor burden (TB) and prevent disease progression with no severe comorbidities by the administration of a bridge chemotherapy. That will decrease the risk of severe (grade 3-4 ASTCT) Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) with an improvement of event free survival. Nevertheless, there is no consensus nor standard guidelines about bridge chemotherapy type, especially in pediatric patients. In this way, the main objective of this study is to identify CAR-T outcomes in pediatric, adolescents and young adults (AYA) diagnosed of BCP-ALL based on bridge chemotherapy. MATHERIAL AND METHODS An observational, retrospective and non-interventional study of Spanish pediatric and AYA under 24 years old diagnosed with BCP-ALL treated with tisagenlecleucel that have been registered by the Spanish Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (GETH-TC) CAR-T clinical database from years 2017 to 2022. Data have been collected from nine centers members of GETH-TC CAR-T workgroup: La Paz University Hospital, Sant Joan de Déu University Hospital, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Niño Jesús Pediatric University Hospital, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Salamanca Clinic University Hospital, Germans Trials i Pujol University Hospital and Valencia Clinic Hospital. General, pre-CAR-T, CAR-T-related and post-CAR-T variables have been analysed from GET-TC CAR-T database, highlighting those related to bridge therapy and related outcomes. Bridging chemotherapy was analyzed considering whether the patients had received high (myelosuppression ≥7 days) or low (myelosuppression ≤7 days) intensity schemes, or in contrast, immunotherapy. Fisher's Exact Test for count data and Log Rank test for Overall Survival (OS), Relapse Free Survival (RFS) and Duration of Response (DOR). Variables with p&amp;lt;0.05 value have been considered of statistical significance. RESULTS Baseline characteristics of the 103 patients are summarized in Table 1. CRS after infusion was presented in 86 (83.5%) patients. Grade 3-4 was developed in 4/29 (13.8%) with low pre infusion TB in contrast to 18/55 (32.7%) with high TB (p=0.001). Complete remission (CR) was achieved 87 (85.3%) patients. All patients (100%) with a low TB were in CR VS 78.2% in the high TB arm (p=0.015). Otherwise, 91.9% of those patients that received low intensity bridge chemotherapy or immunotherapy were in CR VS 71% of those where high intensity bridge was administered (p=0.027). With a median of 23.75 months, OS at 12 months was 62.23% (CI95% 51.71-74.89). No statistical significance was found between bridge chemotherapy groups, although it was higher in low intensity and immunotherapy group (68.33% CI95% 55.41-84.27) VS (57.89% CI95% 40.43-82.89) (p=0.11). With a median of 9.26 months, RFS at 12 months was 41.7% (CI95% 31.71-54.85). No statistical significance was found between bridge chemotherapy groups, but was higher in low intensity group and immunotherapy (51.8% CI95% 39.45-68.01) VS (34.69% CI95% 18.59-64.74) (p=0.089). With a median of 8.28 months, DOR at 12 months was 41.7% (CI95% 31.71-54.85). No statistical significance was found between bridge chemotherapy groups, with an increasing tendency in low intensity group and immunotherapy (51.8% CI95% 39.45-68.01) VS (34.69% CI95% 18.59-64.74) (p=0.089). In the multivariate analysis, grade 3-4 CRS HR 8.7 (CI95% 0.82-92) (p = 0.072) and high TB HR 4.7 (CI95% 1.1-20) (p = 0.038) were related with a decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS Receiving low intensity bridge or immunotherapy is related with high rates of CR. In the same way, in this group of patients there is tendency to achieve higher OS, RFS and DOR. This is the reason because its use should be prioritized avoiding those of high intensity bridge chemotherapy. High TB is an important risk factor related with a poor response and high grade CRS development, so it is essential to reduce TB previous CAR-T infusion in order to improve outcomes and reduce toxicities.

The Therapeutic Efficacy of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Immune Thrombocytopenia Model

Abstract Introduction: ITP is a hemorrhagic autoimmune disease characterized by excessive platelet destruction and impaired platelet production,resulting in a high risk of bleeding. The pathogenesis of ITP involves immune intolerance towards platelet antigen, with platelet autoantibodies produced by plasma cells playing a significant role. Current treatments targeting this pathogenesis mainly rely on CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab. However, as CD20 expression is present at the pre-B cell and mature B cell stages but absent on the surface of mature plasma cells. This can explain why a subset of autoantibody-positive patients do not respond to B-cell depletion therapy. CAR-T cell therapy, a form of adoptive cellular immunotherapy, has shown great potential in hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Recent studies have demonstrated its potential effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in various autoimmune diseases. CD19, expressed at all stages of B cell differentiation, presents an opportunity for CAR-T cell therapy in ITP. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy in an active murine ITP model. Methods: CD42-knockout mice were immunized with wild type (WT) C57BL/6 mice and splenocytes from these immunized mice were transplanted into irradiated WT mice to construct a murine model of active ITP. The ITP mice were then randomized into two groups, with the experimental group receiving an intraperitoneal injection with 1×10 6 CD19 CAR-T cells. Platelet counts were monitored weekly, and after 3 weeks, the ITP mice were euthanized and sacrificed. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from harvested spleens for analysis. Anti-murine antibodies were analyzed using flow cytometry (Beckmann Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). All data were analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P &amp;lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significance. Results: Our results demonstrated that the platelet counts of ITP mice reached their lowest level on day 7 after spleen cell transplantation, gradually recovering within a week. Platelet counts were significantly higher in the CD19 CAR-T cell therapy group compared to the control group on day 7 and persisted until day 21. There were no significant differences in weight between two groups, indicating no severe complication or CRS were identified. In the third week CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, the proportion of plasma cells in the spleen was determined, showing a marked decrease in the percentage of CD138+ plasma cells in the CAR-T group compared to the control group. Additionally, at day 14, the titers of anti-platelet CD42-specific antibodies were significantly lower in the CAR-T cell treated group compared to the control group. Furthermore, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD19+ B cells in the spleen cells of the CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy group was significantly decreased compared to the control group. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in treating thrombocytopenia by suppressing plasma and B cells in a mouse model of active ITP. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential therapeutic application of CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy for immune thrombocytopenia. Disclosure: No conflict of interest.

The Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI): A New Prognostic Score to Predict Overall Survival in Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients Progressing after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. There is no standard treatment after CAR T-cell therapy progression and a wide range of outcomes are observed in this patient population. Besides the interval between CAR T-cell infusion and progressive disease (PD), data regarding prognostic factors at time of progression are scarce. Our aim was to develop a new prognostic tool to predict overall survival (OS) after CAR T-cell therapy progression with easily-available markers from routine clinical practice. Methods: First, we performed a retrospective data collection at 12 Spanish centers of R/R LBCL patients who progressed after CAR T-cell therapy in the third or later line setting from September 2018 until June 2022 (training cohort, TC). We analyzed a total of 15 variables, including pre-CAR T-cell therapy characteristics (gender, histology, primary refractory disease, previous hematopoietic transplant, number of previous lines) and values collected at time of progression to CAR T-cells (age, stage, extranodal sites, ECOG, hemoglobin, neutrophils, platelets, LDH, best response to CAR T-cells, time from CAR T-cell infusion to PD). The primary endpoint was OS from date of progression to CAR T-cell therapy. A stratified Cox model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) using post-progression treatment as a stratification factor. We used LASSO regression with minimum lambda to identify which variables had the highest prognostic impact on OS. Additionally, the factors with a lower contribution were eliminated to create a parsimonious model. The C-statistic was used to evaluate its discrimination. We examined the performance of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) score and Revised IPI (R-IPI) in this setting. Finally, we tested the score in an external validation cohort (VC) which included a comparable patient population from 3 European countries. Results: Among the 216 LBCL patients included in the TC, most were male (66%), had an ECOG of 1 (48%) and stage IV disease (71%) at time of CAR T-cell therapy progression. Median time from CAR T-cell infusion to PD was 2.5 months (95CI% 1.9-2.9) and median follow-up from progression was 15 months. Salvage treatment was classified into 3 subgroups, including immunotherapy or targeted agents (43%), chemotherapy or radiotherapy (20%) and palliative care (38%). To build the prognostic score, a total of 5 variables were selected. Each marker received 1 point (given the similar HR [1.48-1.77]), if they met defined criteria: ECOG (&amp;gt;0), hemoglobin (&amp;lt;10 g/dL), LDH (&amp;gt;2 x upper normal limit), number of extranodal sites (&amp;gt;1) and time from CAR T-cell infusion to PD (&amp;lt;4 months). Patients with 0-1 points were classified as low risk, 2 points as intermediate-low risk, 3 points as intermediate-high risk and 4 or 5 points as high risk. In the TC, the 4 risk groups showed statistically significant differences in OS (Figure 1). In the low-risk group (n=39 [18%]), the median OS [mOS] was not reached; in the intermediate-low risk (n=56 [26%]) mOS was 7.3 months (HR=2.89, p=0.002); in the intermediate-high risk (n=57 [26%]) mOS was 4.9 months (HR=4.81, p&amp;lt;0.001) and in the high risk (n=64 [30%]) mOS was 1.8 months (HR=6.69, p&amp;lt;0.001). In terms of post-relapse therapies, both the chemo/radiotherapy and the immunotherapy groups showed a balanced patient distribution, from low to high risk (32%, 35%, 14% and 19% vs 22%, 32%, 30% and 16%, respectively). The VC included 204 patients with a similar patient distribution in the 4 prognostic risk groups (35%, 25%, 12%, 27%). The mOS for each of these groups was 15.2, 5.3, 2.9 and 0.9 months, respectively. Each group had distinct OS outcomes when compared with all the other risk groups (p&amp;lt;0.05 for each comparison) (Figure 2). Finally, our model presented a C-index of 0.712 for the TC and 0.811 for the VC, outperforming both the IPI (0.647 [TC] and 0.691 [VC]) and R-IPI (0.632 [TC] and 0.683 [VC]). Conclusions: The Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI) is a clinically useful tool for OS prediction and risk-adapted treatment planning in LBCL patients progressing after CAR T-cell therapy. In addition, our results will help stratification in clinical trials which include patients with prior CAR T-cell therapy.

Development and validation of a model based on immunogenic cell death related genes to predict the prognosis and immune response to bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) has been categorized as a variant of regulated cell death that is capable of inducing an adaptive immune response. A growing body of evidence has indicated that ICD can modify the tumor immune microenvironment by releasing danger signals or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), potentially enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy. Consequently, the identification of biomarkers associated with ICD that can classify patients based on their potential response to ICD immunotherapy would be highly advantageous. Therefore the goal of the study is to better understand and identify what patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) will respond to immunotherapy by analyzing ICD signatures and investigate ICD-related prognostic factors in the context of BLCA. The data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases regarding BLCA and normal samples was categorized based on ICD-related genes (IRGs). Specifically, we conducted an immunohistochemical (IHC) experiment to validate the expression levels of Calreticulin (CALR) in both tumor and adjacent tissues, and evaluated its prognostic significance using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve. Subsequently, the samples from TCGA were divided into two subtypes using consensus clustering. To obtain a more comprehensive comprehension of the biological functions, we utilized Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). The calculation of immune landscape between two subtypes was performed through ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT. Risk models were constructed using Cox and Lasso regression and their prognosis predictive ability was evaluated using nomogram, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and calibration curves. Finally, Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) algorithms was utilized to predict the response to immunotherapy. A total of 34 IRGs were identified, with most of them exhibiting upregulation in BLCA samples. The expression of CALR was notably higher in BLCA compared to the adjacent tissue, and this increase was associated with an unfavorable prognosis. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with ICD were linked to various immune-related pathways. The ICD-high subtypes exhibited an immune-activated tumor microenvironment (TME) compared to the ICD-low subtypes. Utilizing three IRGs including CALR, IFNB1, and IFNG, a risk model was developed to categorize BLCA patients into high- and low-risk groups. The overall survival (OS) was considerably greater in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group, as evidenced by both the TCGA and GEO cohorts. The risk score was identified as an independent prognostic parameter (all p < 0.001). Our model demonstrated good predictive ability (The area under the ROC curve (AUC), AUC1-year= 0.632, AUC3-year= 0.637, and AUC5-year =0.653). Ultimately, the lower risk score was associated with a more responsive immunotherapy group. The potential of the ICD-based risk signature to function as a marker for evaluating the prognosis and immune landscape in BLCA suggests its usefulness in identifying the suitable population for effective immunotherapy against BLCA.

Novel Agents May be Preferable to Standard Chemotherapy in Second-Line for Early Relapsing Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Patients

Introduction Early progression of FL after first line treatment is associated with poor outcomes. Disease progression within 24 months of initial therapy (POD24) is well-established adverse prognostic factor, while maintaining a complete remission (CR) at 30 months after initiation of induction therapy is considered a good surrogate for a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, treatment strategies in the second-line setting for these early relapsing patients are not clearly established, being their management heterogeneous across centers. The aim of our study was to analyze treatment patterns in this setting and to compare outcomes for patients who received chemotherapy (CT)-based regimens and immunotherapy (IT) approaches. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with grade 1-3a FL treated with upfront (CT) that progressed within 30 months of initial therapy (POD30) in 9 centers from January 2015 to June 2023. Patients who received single agent monoclonal antibodies or radiotherapy as first line treatment, and patients with FL grade 3b or histological transformation were excluded from the analysis. We defined 2 groups of patients according to the second-line regimen: the CT group, comprised by patients who received bendamustine-based regimens or other CT combinations, and the IT group that included patients who received monoclonal antibodies with lenalidomide and/or CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies. Outcomes of interest were overall and complete response rate (ORR/CRR), PFS and overall survival (OS). Results Among 114 POD30 FL patients, 93 received CT and 21 received IT as second line treatment. Median age for the overall cohort was 56 years, with no differences according to salvage therapy (57 vs 53 years, p=0.19). Fifty-nine patients (52%) were female and 104 (94%) presented an advanced stage disease. Most of the patients in both groups had a high-risk FL at diagnosis (68% vs 67%, p=0.89) and at the time of first relapse (51% vs 24%, p=0.03), respectively. Distribution of first line treatment was well balanced between both groups. CHOP-based regimens were administered in 81% patients from the CT group and 90% in the IT group while bendamustine-based regimens were administered in 6% patients from the CT group and 10% in the IT group. In terms of best response to frontline therapy, 28 patients (25%) attained a CR, 59 patients (52%) a partial response (PR), 7 patients (6%) a stable disease (SD) and 20 patients (18%) a progressive disease (PD). Maintenance treatment was administered in 78 patients (68%), 59 patients (63%) from the CT group and 19 patients (90%) from the IT group ( p=0.03). Second-line treatment in the CT group included bendamustine-based regimens (n=40, 43%), ESHAP (n=31, 33%), gemcitabine-based (n=7, 8%), and other regimens (n=15, 16%), while the IT cohort comprised patients treated with lenalidomide in combination with monoclonal antibodies (n=5, 24%) and bispecific antibodies (n=16, 76%). For the full set of patients, best response included CR in 47 patients (43%), PR in 23 patients (21%), SD in 10 patients (9%) and PD in 30 patients (18%). For the CT and IT groups, there were no significant differences in terms of ORR (64% vs 60%, p=0.66) or CRR (42% vs 45%, p=0.87), respectively. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was performed as a consolidative strategy in 27 patients (24%) from the overall cohort (29% for the CT cohort and 5% for the IT, p=0.05). Median follow up was 39.2 from diagnosis and 15.4 months from second-line treatment. Median PFS for patients receiving CT as second line of treatment was 11 months (95% CI: 6.3 - 15.2), compared to 16 months (95% CI: 13.01 - NA) for patients receiving IT (HR: 0.5, CI 95% 0.25-1; p=0.05). Finally, median OS for patients receiving CT as salvage therapy was 45.6 months (95% CI: 24.15% - NA), while median OS was not reached for patients receiving IT (HR: 0.19, CI 95% 0.03-1.4; p=0.1). Conclusions Treatment approaches for early relapsing FL are heterogeneous across centers, with many patients receiving chemotherapy as salvage therapy. Nevertheless, in our study a trend to a prolonged PFS and OS is observed in the group of patients receiving immunotherapy as salvage treatment. Novel agents such as lenalidomide and bispecific antibodies alone or in combination seem to improve the outcome in this population of FL with poor prognosis.

Too Much of a Good Thing: The Association of Elevated Vitamin B12 Levels and Outcomes in Patients With Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy.

Metabolic pathways may regulate responses to cancer immunotherapy (IO). Due to its immunomodulatory properties, we sought to examine the association between serum vitamin B12 (VitB12) and survival in individuals with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, compared with biological and chemotherapy. We collected data on patients with advanced cancer initiating intravenous antineoplastic treatment and a concomitant VitB12 measurement (elevated: >820ng/L), between January 2010 and January 2022. Patients on IO and other regimens (control) were compared using the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables, χ 2 test or Fisher test for categorical variables, and multivariate Cox regression models assessed the effect of VitB12 on overall survival and progression-free survival, adjusting for confounders. Patient groups (control: n = 408; IO: n = 93) were balanced for the treatment line and VitB12 (elevated 29.9% vs 23.7%; mean 762.4 vs 687.6ng/L). In multivariate analysis, overall survival in all patients was negatively associated with VitB12 [control: hazard ratio (HR): 1.4, 95% CI: 1.01-1.96, P = 0.04, false discovery rate (FDR): 0.069; IO: HR: 2.74 as sum of linear baseline and interaction effects, log scale], age (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, P < 0.01), male sex (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.88, P < 0.01), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.48-0.99, P = 0.01). However, VitB12 was significantly negatively associated with progression-free survival only in the IO group ( P < 0.001, FDR < 0.001, calculated HR: 8.34; biological treatment P = 0.08; FDR: 0.111; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, P = 0.07; FDR: 0.09). Taken together, elevated VitB12 was a negative predictor for outcomes on IO, independently of other known prognostic factors. Further research is needed to elucidate the immune-metabolic interplay and its interaction with the gut microbiome, as well as interventional strategies to enhance IO responses.