Introduction: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) remain a cornerstone of renal transplantation immunosuppression. Whilst monitoring of blood CNI levels have been the traditional tool for adjusting CNI administration, it is clear that this is an imperfect strategy. Although data is conflicting, there is evidence that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within genes involved in ciclosporin metabolism and transport are associated with ciclosporin pharmacokinetics. Less data is available in regard to polymorphisms of the donor, although small studies suggest an association between genetic variation in the ABCB1 gene and “acute ciclosporin nephrotoxicity” and allograft failure. Both focussed on the C3435T polymorphism within ABCB1, an exonic SNP for which the TT genotype is associated with reduced P-gp expression. The purpose of this study was to further assess the relationship of both donor and recipient genotype with the hard outcomes of allograft survival and mortality. Methods: Positive findings from an initial study cohort were examined in two further independent populations, in a study incorporating a total of 6169 transplant recipients and their respective donors followed for a period of up to 20 years. The initial cohort consisted of 811 Caucasian transplant donors and their respective recipients transplanted at he Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham between 1996 and 2006, for which genomic DNA was available. All patients received ciclosporin and corticosteroids as primary immunosuppression, with 23% receiving mycophenolate (77% azathioprine). A comprehensive survey of sequence variation in the target genes was assessed using a “gene tagging” approach based on data from the Hapmap Project, as well as specifically investigating previously identified relevant polymorphisms. Genes studied were: CyP3A4, CyP3A5, ABCB1 (MDR1), PXR, Cyclophilin. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the donor ABCB1 genotype at C3435T was associated with death-censored allograft failure. Inferior outcomes were seen for kidneys from donors expressing the CC genotype. This difference persisted in a Cox proportional hazards model (donor CC versus non-CC genotype: Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.69; 95%CI: 1.20, 2.40; p=0.003), adjusted for the following: donor age, gender, source (living versus deceased), serum creatinine, hypertension history; recipient age, race, duration of dialysis, cause of renal failure, transplant number, panel reactive anti-HLA antibodies; donor-recipient HLA mismatch. This association between donor ABCB1 genotype at C3435T was next examined in the 2 replication cohorts, the first consisting of 697 patients transplanted in Belfast, and the second consisting of 4656 recipients reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study. In neither of these cohorts was there evidence of an association between donor genotype and death-censored graft failure. No association between any other gene variants (donor or recipient) and either death-censored graft survival or mortality were seen in the Birmingham cohort, and so no attempt was made to replicate these analyses in the other cohorts. Conclusion: This study does not support the concept that either donor or recipient variation at genes relevant for CNI metabolism and transport influences the hard outcomes of kidney transplantation, and reaffirms the importance of replication cohorts prior to assigning relevance to such genetic biomarkers.