Immunogenicity Assessment Research Articles

Challenging the Norm: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Intravenous to Subcutaneous Bridging Strategies for Biologics.

The transition from intravenous (i.v.) to subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of biologics is a critical strategy in drug development aimed at improving patient convenience, compliance, and therapeutic outcomes. Focusing on the increasing role of model-informed drug development (MIDD) in the acceleration of this transition, an in-depth overview of the essential clinical pharmacology, and regulatory considerations for successful i.v. to s.c. bridging for biologics after the i.v. formulation has been approved are presented. Considerations encompass multiple aspects beginning with adequate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (i.e., exposure-response) evaluations which play a vital role in establishing comparability between the i.v. and s.c. routes of administrations. Selected key recommendations and points to consider include: (i) PK characterization of the s.c. formulation, supported by the increasing preclinical understanding of the s.c. absorption, and robust PK study design and analyses in humans; (ii) a thorough characterization of the exposure-response profiles including important metrics of exposure for both efficacy and safety; (iii) comparability studies designed to meet regulatory considerations and support approval of the s.c. formulation, including noninferiority studies with PK and/or efficacy and safety as primary end points; and (iv) comprehensive safety package addressing assessments of immunogenicity and patients' safety profile with the new route of administration. Recommendations for successful bridging strategies are evolving and MIDD approaches have been used successfully to accelerate the transition to s.c. dosing, ultimately leading to improved patient experiences, adherence, and clinical outcomes.

An IQ Consortium Perspective on Best Practices for Bioanalytical and Immunogenicity Assessment Aspects of CAR-T and TCR-T Cellular Therapies Development.

CAR-T therapies have shown remarkable efficacy against hematological malignancies in the clinic over the last decade and new studies indicate that progress is being made to use these novel therapies to target solid tumors as well as treat autoimmune disease. Innovation in the field, including TCR-T, allogeneic or "off the shelf" CAR-T, and autoantigen/armored CAR-Ts are likely to increase the efficacy and applications of these therapies. The unique aspects of these cell-based therapeutics; patient-derived cells, intracellular expression, in vivo expansion, and phenotypic changes provide unique bioanalytical challenges to develop pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assessments. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group (TALG) has brought together a group of industry experts to discuss and consider these challenges. In this white paper, we present the IQ consortium perspective on the best practices and considerations for bioanalytical and immunogenicity aspects toward the optimal development of CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies.

Application of N-Terminal Site-Specific Biotin and Digoxigenin Conjugates to Clinical Anti-drug Antibody Assay Development.

Biotin- and digoxigenin (DIG)-conjugated therapeutic drugs are critical reagents used for the development of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays for the assessment of immunogenicity. The current practice of generating biotin and DIG conjugates is to label a therapeutic antibody with biotin or DIG via primary amine groups on lysine or N-terminal residues. This approach modifies lysine residues nonselectively, which can impact the ability of an ADA assay to detect those ADAs that recognize epitopes located at or near the modified lysine residue(s). The impact of the lysine modification is considered greater for therapeutic antibodies that have a limited number of lysine residues, such as the variable heavy domain of heavy chain (VHH) antibodies. In this paper, for the first time, we report the application of site-specifically conjugated biotin- and DIG-VHH reagents to clinical ADA assay development using a model molecule, VHHA. The site-specific conjugation of biotin or DIG to VHHA was achieved by using an optimized reductive alkylation approach, which enabled the majority of VHHA molecules labeled with biotin or DIG at the desirable N-terminus, thereby minimizing modification of the protein after labeling and reducing the possibility of missing detection of ADAs. Head-to-head comparison of biophysical characterization data revealed that the site-specific biotin and DIG conjugates demonstrated overall superior quality to biotin- and DIG-VHHA prepared using the conventional amine coupling method, and the performance of the ADA assay developed using site-specific biotin and DIG conjugates met all acceptance criteria. The approach described here can be applied to the production of other therapeutic-protein- or antibody-based critical reagents that are used to support ligand binding assays.

Development of automated microfluidic immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and antigen

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. Rapid and sensitive detection of the virus soon after infection is important for the treatment and prevention of transmission of COVID-19, and detection of antibodies is important for epidemiology, assessment of vaccine immunogenicity, and identification of the natural reservoir and intermediate host(s). Patient nasal or oropharyngeal swabs or saliva used in conjunction with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA, whereas lateral flow immunoassays (LFI) detect SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in blood. Although effective, these assays have poor sensitivity (e.g., LFI) or are labor intensive and time consuming (PCR and ELISA). Here we describe the development of rapid, automated ELISA-based immunoassays to detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens and antibodies against the virus. The Simple Plex™ platform uses rapid microfluidic reaction kinetics for sensitive analyte detection with small sample volumes. We developed three sensitive <90-min Simple Plex immunoassays that measure either the SARS-CoV-2 antigens or the immune response to SARS-CoV-2, including neutralizing antibodies, in serum from COVID-19 patients.

Baseline Pneumococcal IgG Levels and Response to 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine among Adults from Beijing, China.

To investigate the baseline levels of serotype-specific IgG antibodies to Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and assess their impact on the assessment of vaccine immunogenicity. We used a subset of serum samples from a randomized controlled trial. The blood of 584 healthy participants was collected on day 0 before and day 28 after the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) vaccination. Serotype-specific IgG against PPSV23-covered serotypes were measured by the World Health Organization (WHO) reference enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Vaccine immunogenicity was compared using conversion rates (proportion of participants with IgG levels following immunization that are 2-fold greater than the baseline) and geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) between the two groups, which were grouped according to pre-vaccination (baseline) IgG antibody levels. Our data showed that over half of individuals have baseline IgG levels for 15 out of 23 serotypes above 1.3 µg/mL, and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were generally higher in the elderly group and the female group; significant differences were found in 15 serotypes for vaccine immunogenicity based on the seroconversion rate or GMFRs between individuals with baseline IgG ≥ 1.3 µg/mL and individuals with baseline IgG < 1.3 µg/mL. The seroconversion rate decreased with the increase of baseline IgG levels according to a linear regression model. The assessment of vaccine immunogenicity could be impacted by the fact that many adults had high baseline antibody levels. This study is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number NCT05298800.

Humoral immunogenicity assessment after receiving three types of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

Several vaccines have been developed against SARS-CoV-2 and subsequently approved by national/international regulators. Detecting specific antibodies after vaccination enables us to evaluate the vaccine’s effectiveness. We conducted a prospective longitudinal study among members of Tarbiat Modares University of Tehran, Iran, from 4 September 2021 until 29 December 2021. We aimed to compare the humoral immunogenicity of 3 vaccine types. Participants consisted of 462 adults. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain [RBD] IgG titer was compared in 3 groups, each vaccinated by available vaccines in Iran at the time: Oxford/AstraZeneca, COVIran Barekat, and Sinopharm. The median IgG titer was: 91.2, 105.6, 224.0 BAU/ml for Sinopharm, COVIran Barekat and Oxford/AstraZeneca respectively after the first dose; 195.2, 192.0, 337.6 BAU/ml after the second one. We also analyzed the frequency of antibody presence in each vaccine group, in the same order the results were 59.0%, 62.6% and 89.4% after the first dose and 92.1%,89.5% and 98.9% after the second. The comparison of results demonstrated that AstraZeneca vaccine is a superior candidate vaccine for COVID-19 vaccination out of the three. Our data also demonstrated statistically significant higher antibody titer among recipients with an infection history.

STING-targeted PET tracer for early assessment of tumor immunogenicity in colorectal cancer after chemotherapy.

To optimize chemotherapy regimens and improve the effectiveness of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, a PET tracer specifically targeting the stimulator of interferon genes (STING), denoted as [18F]FBTA was used to monitor the early changes in tumor immunogenicity after chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) mice. The toluene sulfonate precursor was labeled with 18F to produce the STING targeted probe-[18F]FBTA. [18F]FBTA-PET imaging and biodistribution were performed using CRC mice treated with oxaliplatin (OXA) or cisplatin (CDDP). CRC mice were also treated with low (CDDP-LD: 1 mg/kg) or medium (CDDP-MD: 2.5 mg/kg) doses of CDDP, and subjected to PET imaging and biodistribution. The effects of different chemotherapeutic agents and different doses of CDDP on tumor innate immunity were verified by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. PET imaging of CRC mice exhibited notably enhanced tumor uptake in the early phase of chemotherapy with treatment with OXA (3.09 ± 0.25%ID/g) and CDDP (4.01 ± 0.18%ID/g), especially in the CDDP group. The PET-derived tumor uptake values have strong correlations with STING immunohistochemical score. Flow cytometry showed both agents led to DCs and macrophages infiltration in tumors. Compared with OXA, CDDP treatment recruits more DCs and macrophages in CRC tumors. Both CDDP-LD and CDDP-MD treatment elevated uptake in CRC tumors, especially in CDDP-MD group. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry confirmed CDDP-MD treatment recruits more DCs and macrophages than CDDP-LD treatment. Overall, the STING-targeted tracer-[18F]FBTA was demonstrated to monitor early changes in tumor immunogenicity in CRC mice after chemotherapy. Besides, the STING-targeted strategy may help to select the appropriate chemotherapy regimen, including chemotherapeutic agents and doses, which further improve clinical decision making for combination immunotherapy after chemotherapy for CRC.

A Phase 1 Study of PIT565, a First-in-Class, Anti-CD3, Anti-CD19, Anti-CD2 Trispecific Antibody in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies

Background and Significance: There is an unmet therapeutic need for patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and R/R B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who have failed multiple lines of therapy. PIT565 is an investigational, first-in-class, immunoglobulin G-like, trispecific antibody that targets CD19 on malignant B cells while engaging CD3 and CD2 (a costimulatory receptor) on T cells, leading to redirected T-cell cytotoxicity toward CD19-positive malignant B cells. CD2 signaling prevents transcriptional changes characteristic of exhaustion during persistent T-cell receptor stimulation of CD8 T cells. Furthermore, the loss of CD2 ligand, CD58, on tumor cells has been shown to mediate resistance to the antitumor activity by T cell-redirecting therapies, confirming the importance of CD2 activation in T cells. Findings from preclinical studies suggest that PIT565 mediates more potent and sustained antitumor T-cell responses compared with CD3 bispecifics (Lu H, ASH 2022). Study Design and Methods: This is an open-label, phase 1, multicenter study of PIT565 in patients with R/R B-NHL and R/R CD19-positive B-ALL who have relapsed/failed to respond to ≥2 lines of prior therapy (including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody-containing chemotherapy combination regimen for patients with R/R B-NHL) (NCT05397496). The study is ongoing with plans to enroll approximately 140 patients in Belgium, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Singapore, Spain, and the USA. Eligible patients are ≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and have at least one bi-dimensionally measurable nodal lesion or one bi-dimensionally measurable extranodal lesion as measured via positron emission tomography-computed tomography for R/R B-NHL, and/ or morphologic disease in the bone marrow (³5% blasts) for R/R B-ALL. Patients with contraindication to tocilizumab; history of other malignant disease; active central nervous system involvement; autoimmune disease (other than patients with vitiligo, hypothyroidism only requiring hormone replacement, or psoriasis not requiring systemic treatment or conditions not expected to recur); or receiving systemic treatment with any immunosuppressive medication are not eligible. During the dose escalation part of the study, PIT565 is administered to patients with R/R B-NHL (Group A) and patients with R/R B-ALL (Group B). During the dose-expansion part, PIT565 is administered to patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who have received CD-19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy (Group A1); patients with R/R LBCL who have not received CAR-T therapy (Group A2); and patients with R/R B-ALL (Group B1). PIT565 is administered either once weekly (Q1W) or once every 2 weeks (Q2W) with and without a priming dosing. Routes of administration (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC]) are explored in the dose-escalation phase. Patients initially receive PIT565 IV Q1W over a 28-day cycle. Q2W treatment in a 28-day cycle is explored if supported by preliminary pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety findings. The primary objective is to assess safety (including dose-limiting toxicities) and tolerability, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose (RD), schedule, and route of administration for each indication. Secondary objectives include evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity (overall response rate, complete response rate, best overall response, duration of response, overall survival, and progression-free survival for B-NHL or event-free survival for B-ALL), assessment of PK and immunogenicity of PIT565 in R/R B-NHL and R/R B-ALL. The dose escalation phase is guided by an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model following the escalation with overdose control principle. The MTD and/or RD are further explored during the dose-expansion phase.

Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity of Abbv-383, a B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) × CD3 Bispecific T-Cell-Redirecting Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Introduction ABBV-383 is a fully human, silenced Fc region IgG4 monoclonal, BCMA × CD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody with 2 BCMA-binding domains and a low-affinity CD3-binding domain. ABBV-383 has shown promising activity following intravenous (IV) infusion every three weeks (Q3W) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with RRMM in an ongoing phase 1 study (D'Souza A, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3576-3586; Voorhees et al. Blood 2022;140[suppl 1]:4401). Herein, preliminary pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity results from Q3W regimens of this study and impact of soluble BCMA (sBCMA) on ABBV-383 PK are reported. Methods In the phase 1 study (NCT03933735), adult pts with RRMM, who were previously exposed to ≥3 prior multiple myeloma agents including ≥1 proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, received Q3W IV infusion at doses 0.025 - 120 mg in escalation (ESC) phase, and at 20 mg, 40 mg, and 60 mg in expansion (EXP) phase. Serial blood samples for PK characterization were collected in cycles 1, 3, and 6 along with sparse/periodic samples throughout the study. Blood samples were also collected throughout the study to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) for immunogenicity characterization and to determine sBCMA concentrations. Appropriate validated assays were used to determine ‘total’ (unbound and bound to sBCMA) and ‘free’ (unbound and partially bound to sBCMA) ABBV-383 serum concentrations, to detect/determine ADAs/titers, and to determine total sBCMA concentrations. ‘Total’ and ‘free’ ABBV-383 serum concentrations from cycles 1, 3, and 6 were used to calculate individual PK parameters (peak concentration [C max], trough concentration [C trough], area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], terminal phase elimination half-life [t 1/2], clearance [CL], and steady state volume of distribution [V ss]) using non-compartmental analysis in Phoenix WinNonlin Version 8.2. Immunogenicity was summarized using ADA/titer data. Impact of baseline/pre-dose sBCMA concentrations on ‘total’ and ‘free’ ABBV-383 PK parameters from cycles 1, 3, and 6 was explored. Results ‘Total’ and ‘free’ ABBV-383 intensive PK data (cycles 1, 3, and 6) were available from 169 and 157 pts, respectively, representing Q3W regimens in ESC and EXP cohorts and ADA data were available from 186 evaluable subjects. Preliminary PK results suggest that ‘total’ and ‘free’ ABBV-383 exhibited approximately dose-proportional PK between 5.4-120 mg Q3W. Estimated t 1/2 for ‘total’ and ‘free’ ABBV-383 ranged between 11-12 days and 8-11 days, respectively, with steady state achieved by cycle 4 in Q3W EXP cohorts. Estimated CL and V ss were consistent with those of a typical IgG4 antibody in humans. Across EXP Q3W regimens, accumulation (cycle 3 vs. cycle 1) was 30%-60% in C max and 60%-177% in C trough for ‘free’ and ‘total’ ABBV-383. ABBV-383 exposures (AUC tau and C trough) of ‘total’ ABBV-383 were 28-74% higher than those representing ‘free’ ABBV-383 among the EXP Q3W regimens with no/minimal observed differences in C max (≤21%). Higher sBCMA levels prior to treatment appeared to reduce ‘free’ ABBV-383 PK exposures with pronounced reduction at lower doses (e.g., 20 mg) and in cycle 1, however the effect diminished in later cycles (cycles 3 and 5). Preliminary assessment of immunogenicity indicated an ADA incidence of 3.8% (7/186) with low titers ranging between 11.7 and 187 titer units and no impact on PK. Conclusions ABBV-383 exhibited a PK profile with relatively long half-life and low incidence of immunogenicity. Overall, sBCMA impacted (reduced) the ‘free’ ABBV-383 (pharmacologically active component) PK exposures only, with pronounced effect at lower doses and the effect is consistent with understanding of treatment dependent sBCMA dynamics over time. Determination of both ‘total’ and ‘free’ ABBV-383 serum concentrations allowed to demonstrate such underlying impact of sBCMA on PK.

Immune responses and clinical outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with liver disease and liver transplant recipients

Comparative assessments of immunogenicity following different COVID-19 vaccines in patients with distinct liver diseases are lacking. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell and antibody responses were evaluated longitudinally after one to three vaccine doses, with long-term follow-up for COVID-19-related clinical outcomes. A total of 849 participants (355 with cirrhosis, 74 with autoimmune hepatitis [AIH], 36 with vascular liver disease [VLD], 257 liver transplant recipients [LTRs] and 127 healthy controls [HCs]) were recruited from four countries. Standardised immune assays were performed pre and post three vaccine doses (V1-3). In the total cohort, there were incremental increases in antibody titres after each vaccine dose (p <0.0001). Factors associated with reduced antibody responses were age and LT, whereas heterologous vaccination, prior COVID-19 and mRNA platforms were associated with greater responses. Although antibody titres decreased between post-V2 and pre-V3 (p= 0.012), patients with AIH, VLD, and cirrhosis had equivalent antibody responses to HCs post-V3. LTRs had lower and more heterogenous antibody titres than other groups, including post-V3 where 9% had no detectable antibodies; this was heavily influenced by intensity of immunosuppression. Vaccination increased T-cell IFNγ responses in all groups except LTRs. Patients with liver disease had lower functional antibody responses against nine Omicron subvariants and reduced T-cell responses to Omicron BA.1-specific peptides compared to wild-type. 122 cases of breakthrough COVID-19 were reported of which 5/122 (4%) were severe. Of the severe cases, 4/5 (80%) occurred in LTRs and 2/5 (40%) had no serological response post-V2. After three COVID-19 vaccines, patients with liver disease generally develop robust antibody and T-cell responses to vaccination and have mild COVID-19. However, LTRs have sustained no/low antibody titres and appear most vulnerable to severe disease. Standardised assessments of the immune response to different COVID-19 vaccines in patients with liver disease are lacking. We performed antibody and T-cell assays at multiple timepoints following up to three vaccine doses in a large cohort of patients with a range of liver conditions. Overall, the three most widely available vaccine platforms were immunogenic and appeared to protect against severe breakthrough COVID-19. This will provide reassurance to patients with chronic liver disease who were deemed at high risk of severe COVID-19 during the pre-vaccination era, however, liver transplant recipients had the lowest antibody titres and remained vulnerable to severe breakthrough infection. We also characterise the immune response to multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants and describe the interaction between disease type, severity, and vaccine platform. These insights may prove useful in the event of future viral infections which also require rapid vaccine development and delivery to patients with liver disease.

A novel recombinant S-based subunit vaccine induces protective immunity against porcine deltacoronavirus challenge in piglets.

As an emerging porcine enteropathogenic coronavirus that has the potential to infect humans, porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) is receiving increasing attention. However, no effective commercially available vaccines against this virus are available. In this work, we designed a spike (S) protein and receptor-binding domain (RBD) trimer as a candidate PDCoV subunit vaccine. We demonstrated that S protein induced more robust humoral and cellular immune responses than the RBD trimer in mice. Furthermore, the protective efficacy of the S protein was compared with that of inactivated PDCoV vaccines in piglets and sows. Of note, the immunized piglets and suckling pig showed a high level of NAbs and were associated with reduced virus shedding and mild diarrhea, and the high level of NAbs was maintained for at least 4 months. Importantly, we demonstrated that S protein-based subunit vaccines conferred significant protection against PDCoV infection.

The MHC Associated Peptide Proteomics assay is a useful tool for the non-clinical assessment of immunogenicity.

The propensity of therapeutic proteins to elicit an immune response, poses a significant challenge in clinical development and safety of the patients. Assessment of immunogenicity is crucial to predict potential adverse events and design safer biologics. In this study, we employed MHC Associated Peptide Proteomics (MAPPS) to comprehensively evaluate the immunogenic potential of re-engineered variants of immunogenic FVIIa analog (Vatreptacog Alfa). Our finding revealed the correlation between the protein sequence affinity for MHCII and the number of peptides identified in a MAPPS assay and this further correlates with the reduced T-cell responses. Moreover, MAPPS enable the identification of "relevant" T cell epitopes and may contribute to the development of biologics with lower immunogenic potential.

A competitive ligand binding assay for detection of neutralizing antibodies against an insulin analog

Biotherapeutics have the potential to trigger undesired immune responses in the patients. For therapeutic proteins, immunogenicity is manifested as anti-drug antibodies (ADA). Because ADA could compromise pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, regulatory agencies require immunogenicity assessment during clinical development. A tiered bioanalytical approach is recommended to monitor clinical immunogenicity, and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) are studied in Tier 4 if the molecule is immunogenic. Although cell-based assays, which reflect the pharmacological mechanism of action, are in some cases the preferred assay format for detecting NAbs, they are associated with operational complexity and sometimes suboptimal assay performance. Alternatively, non-cell-based assays have also been developed and implemented. In our current study, a competitive ligand binding assay (CLBA) was developed to detect NAbs for insulin efsitora alfa (efsitora, basal insulin Fc, LY3209590), a novel fusion protein being studied for the treatment of Type 1 diabetes and Type 2 diabetes. The CLBA demonstrated acceptable sensitivity, drug tolerance, precision, and robustness, and thus provides a suitable approach for detecting NAbs against efsitora.

Antibody Persistence Following Administration of a Hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T Vaccine Versus Separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T and IPV Vaccines and Safety and Immunogenicity of a Booster Dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T Administered With an MMR Vaccine in Healthy Infants in India.

Antibody persistence of a whole-cell pertussis-containing hexavalent vaccine (DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T) and its co- or sequential administration with measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine were evaluated. Phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study in India. Healthy toddlers aged 12-24 months who had received DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T or separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T+IPV primary vaccination at 6-8, 10-12 and 14-16 weeks of age received a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T booster concomitantly with MMR (N = 336) or 28 days before MMR (N = 340). Participants had received a first dose of measles vaccine. Immunogenicity assessment used validated assays and safety was by parental reports. All analyses were descriptive. All participants had prebooster anti-T ≥0.01 IU/mL and anti-polio 1 and 3 ≥8 1/dil, and ≥96.5% had anti-D ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL, anti-polio 2 ≥8 1/dil and anti-PRP ≥0.15 µg/mL; for pertussis, antibody persistence was similar in each group. Postbooster immunogenicity for DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T was similar for each antigen in each group: ≥99.5% of participants had anti-D ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-T ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-polio 1, 2 and 3 >8 1/dil, anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL and anti-PRP ≥1 µg/mL; for pertussis, vaccine response was similar in each group [72.0%-75.9% (anti-PT), 80.8%-81.4% (anti-FIM), 77.6%-79.5% (anti-PRN), 78.2%-80.8% (anti-FHA)]. There was no difference in MMR immunogenicity between groups, and no difference in DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T booster immunogenicity based on the primary series. There were no safety concerns. DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T antibody persistence was similar to licensed comparators. Booster immunogenicity was robust after DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T with or without MMR, and MMR immunogenicity was not affected by coadministration with DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T. Clinical Trials Registry India Number: CTRI/2020/04/024843.

Safety and immunogenicity of SIIPL Tdap, a new tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, in healthy subjects 4–65 years of age: A Phase II/III randomized, observer-blinded, active controlled, multicenter clinical study in Germany

BackgroundThis study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a new booster vaccine against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis manufactured by Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd (SIIPL Tdap). MethodsThe Phase II/III trial was randomized (2:1), observer blinded and active controlled. Healthy subjects aged 4–65 years received a single dose of either SIIPL Tdap or comparator Tdap vaccine (Boostrix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium), and were followed-up for 30 days. Blood samples for safety and immunogenicity assessments were collected pre-vaccination and on day 30 post-vaccination. The study assessed safety and reactogenicity of SIIPL Tdap compared to the comparator Tdap as well as the co-primary immunogenicity outcomes: (i) seroprotection rates against diphtheria toxoid (DT) and tetanus toxoid (TT) and (ii) the booster response rates against pertussis toxoid (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and pertactin (PRN) 30 days post-vaccination in all study subjects. A margin of −10 % was used for non-inferiority testing. Secondary outcomes included the booster response rates against DT and TT, seropositivity rates against pertussis antigens, and antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for all vaccine components. ResultsAt Day 30 post-vaccination, SIIPL Tdap was assessed as non-inferior to the comparator Tdap in terms of: i) seroprotection rates against DT (94.4 % vs. 94.9 %) and TT (99.9 % vs. 100 %) and ii) pertussis booster response rates (93.8 % vs. 88.4 % anti-PT, 89.7 % vs. 90.9 % anti-FHA and 86.3 % vs. 84.4 % anti-PRN), for SIIPL Tdap versus comparator Tdap, respectively. GMCs for anti-PT and anti-PRN were higher in subjects vaccinated with SIIPL Tdap compared to comparator Tdap. All other secondary outcomes were comparable. The overall frequency of local and systemic solicited AEs was comparable; no treatment related SAEs were reported. ConclusionsBooster vaccination with SIIPL Tdap was non-inferior to comparator Tdap with respect to the immunogenicity of the vaccine components and was equally well tolerated.EudraCT number: 2019-002706-46.

Evaluation of multiple immunoassay formats for detection of anti-drug antibodies to zinpentraxin alfa

Zinpentraxin alfa (rhPTX-2; PRM-151) is currently being developed for the treatment of fibrotic diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and myelofibrosis. Notably, because it is administered chronically and has an endogenously expressed counterpart, clinical studies of zinpentraxin alpha must include immunogenicity assessments. Since the typical homogenous bridging ELISA assay does not adequately measure anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against zinpentraxin alfa, additional assay formats have been developed to evaluate immunogenicity of this therapeutic. Here, we present the evaluation of four distinct assay formats that were used to measure zinpentraxin alpha ADA: step-wise bridging, direct binding, total ADA, and the semi-homogeneous formats, based on multiple parameters including assay sensitivity, precision, and drug tolerance. This paper presents the full details of method development for each of the aforementioned assay formats including evaluation of sample pre-treatment, determination of cut point, and assessment of assay performance by analyzing a subset of clinical samples. Overall, the semi-homogenous ADA assay format with no sample pre-treatment was selected for the measurement of zinpentraxin alpha immunogenicity as it provided the desired sensitivity, drug tolerance, and reproducibility. Our study emphasizes the importance of assay format evaluation during drug development and the necessity to select the most suitable assay format and sample pre-treatment method by which to evaluate therapeutic drug immunogenicity.

THU467 Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of Garetosmab In Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Abstract Disclosure: Y. Wang: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. J. Nguyen: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. R.R. de Ruiter: None. J. Mendell: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. D. Srinivasan: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. J.D. Davis: Employee; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. M.W. Eekhoff: Grant Recipient; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, IMI, IFOPA. Background: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification and flare-ups of soft tissue swellings. It is caused by mutations in the bone-morphogenetic protein (BMP) type-1 activin-A receptor. Garetosmab is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody against activin-A that prevents formation of new heterotopic ossification lesions. Here we report pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity data of garetosmab from the LUMINA-1 study. Methods: LUMINA-1 (NCT03188666) was a phase 2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study that evaluated the safety and efficacy of garetosmab (10 mg/kg/every 4 weeks intravenous) vs placebo in adult patients with FOP over 28 weeks (Period 1), followed by a 28-week open-label treatment period (Period 2) and a subsequent open-label extension (Period 3). Serum samples were obtained from all patients throughout the study to assess PK, immunogenicity, and concentrations of BMP9. Comparative exposure-response analyses of efficacy and safety were performed with trough concentrations of functional garetosmab in serum (Ctrough) as exposure variables. Results: PK data were analyzed in 44 patients with FOP who received garetosmab. Plots of Ctrough over time showed that steady-state PK was reached approximately 12-16 weeks after the first dose of garetosmab. After reaching steady state, Ctrough averaged (±SD) 105 ± 30.8 mg/L. There was no meaningful difference in the PK profiles between patients who did and did not experience epistaxis. Immunogenicity assessments showed anti-garetosmab antibody formation in one patient (1/43; 2.3%) who had a persistently low titer that had no impact on garetosmab PK or clinical effects. Median concentrations of BMP9 in serum were approximately 40 pg/mL at baseline. Levels did not show treatment-related changes over time, nor were differences seen between patients who did and did not experience epistaxis. Over the exposure range achieved at this single-dose level, the comparative exposure-response analyses demonstrated no association between Ctrough and efficacy (number of new heterotopic ossification lesions relative to baseline) or safety (incidence or severity of treatment emergent adverse events of special interest, including epistaxis and composite skin and soft tissue infection). Conclusions: PK steady state was reached within approximately 16 weeks of starting garetosmab treatment, and there were no trends suggesting patients with higher serum exposures to functional garetosmab were more likely to experience adverse events. Incidence of anti-garetosmab antibodies was low and concentrations of BMP9 in serum had no apparent association with epistaxis. Garetosmab is being further evaluated in the phase 3 OPTIMA trial (NCT05394116). Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

A blinded in vitro analysis of the intrinsic immunogenicity of hepatotoxic drugs: implications for preclinical risk assessment.

In vitro preclinical drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk assessment relies largely on the use of hepatocytes to measure drug-specific changes in cell function or viability. Unfortunately, this does not provide indications toward the immunogenicity of drugs and/or the likelihood of idiosyncratic reactions in the clinic. This is because the molecular initiating event in immune DILI is an interaction of the drug-derived antigen with MHC proteins and the T-cell receptor. This study utilized immune cells from drug-naïve donors, recently established immune cell coculture systems and blinded compounds with and without DILI liabilities to determine whether these new methods offer an improvement over established assessment methods for the prediction of immune-mediated DILI. Ten blinded test compounds (6 with known DILI liabilities; 4 with lower DILI liabilities) and 5 training compounds, with known T-cell-mediated immune reactions in patients, were investigated. Naïve T-cells were activated with 4/5 of the training compounds (nitroso sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin, Bandrowski's base, and carbamazepine) and clones derived from the priming assays were activated with drug in a dose-dependent manner. The test compounds with DILI liabilities did not stimulate T-cell proliferative responses during dendritic cell-T-cell coculture; however, CD4+ clones displaying reactivity were detected toward 2 compounds (ciprofloxacin and erythromycin) with known liabilities. Drug-responsive T-cells were not detected with the compounds with lower DILI liabilities. This study provides compelling evidence that assessment of intrinsic drug immunogenicity, although complex, can provide valuable information regarding immune liabilities of some compounds prior to clinical studies or when immune reactions are observed in patients.

Validation of Anti-Adeno Associated Virus Serotype rh10 (AAVrh.10) Total and Neutralizing Antibody Immunogenicity Assays

Immunogenicity assessment of Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) vectors is a critical part of gene therapy drug development. Whether the assays are used for inclusion/exclusion criteria or to monitor the safety and efficacy of the gene therapy, they are critical bioanalytical assessments. While total anti-AAV assays are perceived as easier to develop and implement than neutralizing anti-AAV assays, the gene therapy field is still nascent, and it is not yet clear which of the assays should be implemented at what stage of drug development. Recently AAVrh.10 has gained interest for use in gene therapies targeting cardiac, neurological, and other diseases due to its enhanced transduction efficiency. There is limited information on anti-AAVrh.10 antibodies and their clinical impact; thus, the information presented herein documents the validation of both a total antibody assay (TAb) and a neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay for anti-AAVrh.10 antibodies. In this manuscript, the validation was performed in accordance with the 2019 FDA immunogenicity guidance with additional evaluations to comply with CLIA where applicable. The AAVrh.10 TAb and NAb assays were compared in terms of sensitivity, drug tolerance, and precision, along with a concordance analysis using the same individual serum samples. This comparison gave insight into the utility of each format as a screening assay for inclusion into clinical studies.

Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine response and immunogenicity assessment after one week and three months in repeatedly vaccinated adults

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe influenza vaccine administrated every year is a recommended infection control procedure for individuals above the age of six months. However, the effectiveness of repeated annual vaccination is still an active research topic. Therefore, we investigated the vaccine immunogenicity in two independent groups: previously vaccinated versus non-vaccinated individuals at three time points; prior vaccination, one week and three months post vaccination. The assessment enabled us to evaluate the elicited immune responses and the durability of the induced protection in both groups.Research Design and MethodsA research study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity of a single dose of Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B) in 278 healthy adults aged between 32 and 66 years. Almost half of the participants, 140 (50·36%), received influenza vaccination at least once precursor to past influenza seasons. One blood sample was taken prior to vaccination for complete blood analysis and baseline immunogenicity assessment. The selected study participants received a single vaccine dose on the first day, and then followed up for three months. Two blood samples were taken after one week and three months post vaccination, respectively, for vaccine immunogenicity assessment.ResultsBefore vaccination, the seroprotection, defined as a hemagglutination-inhibiting titer of =>1:40, was detected for the three vaccine virus strains in 20 previously vaccinated participants (14·29%) [8·95%, 21·2%]. We compared the overall vaccine response for the three virus strains using a normalized response score calculated from linearly transformed titer measurements; the score before vaccination was 84% higher in the previously vaccinated group and the mean difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Three months post-vaccination, we didn’t find a significant difference in vaccine responses; the number of fully seroprotected individuals became 48 (34·29%) [26·48%, 42·77%] in the previously vaccinated group and 59 (42·75%) [34·37%, 51·45%] in the non-vaccinated group. The calculated response score was almost equal in both groups and the mean difference was no longer statistically significant.ConclusionOur findings suggest that a single dose of influenza vaccine is equally protective after three months for annually vaccinated adults and first-time vaccine receivers.