Immune Effector Cell-associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome Research Articles

Associations of T-cell fitness prior to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) and bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) therapies and efficacy/toxicity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

7549 Background: While CART and BiTE have led to unprecedented responses in RRMM, some patients (pts) do not respond or have short-lived responses. Currently no predictive markers exist to identify these pts. This study explored pretreatment T-cell fitness and efficacy/toxicity in RRMM using a novel single-cell secretome analysis. We hypothesized that pretreatment Polyfunctional Strength Index (PSI) may predict efficacy to BCMA-directed T-cell therapies. Methods: We included 14 RRMM pts treated with idecabtagene vicleucel or teclistamab at Yale Cancer Center with ≥6 mos post-treatment follow-up. Peripheral blood prior to treatment was frozen and then PBMC’s thawed for analysis. PSI, a metric for T-cell fitness combining polyfunctional T-cells % with the intensity of secreted cytokines, was obtained using the IsoPlexis’ Single-Cell Secretome Platform. The overall PSI was an average of CD4+ and CD8+ PSIs. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and response duration was defined as time from response to disease progression. Responder (R) was defined as ≥very good partial response for ≥6 mos. Non-responder (NR) was defined as stable or progressive disease ≤3 mos. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune-effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded using the American Society for Transplantation & Cellular Therapy system. Statistics were performed with Mann-Whitney U test using GraphPad PRISM v.9. Results: There were 7 pts in R group (2 BiTE & 5 CART) and 7 pts in NR group (3 BiTE & 4 CART). Median follow-up time was 13.5 mos(range, 7-27). Median age at treatment was 64 yrs in R and 63 yrs in NR. Extramedullary disease (EM) was present in 14.3%(n=1) in R and 71.4%(n=5) in NR. High-risk cytogenetics, defined as del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), 1q gain/amplification and del1p, were seen in 42.9%(n=3) in R and 85.7%(n=6) in NR. Median prior lines of therapy was 6(range, 4-9) in R and 8(range, 4-10) in NR. CRS/ICANS occurred 85.7%(n=6) in R and 28.6%(n=2) in NR. Overall PSI was 184 in R and 91 in NR(p=0.1649). CD4+ PSI was 160 in R and 75 in NR(p=0.1649). CD8+ PSI was 207 in R and 108 in NR(p=0.1981). Overall PSI was 143 in CRS/ICANS and 130 in no CRS/ICANS(p=0.7546). Conclusions: Overall PSI, CD4+ PSI and CD8+ PSI were 1.9-2.1 times higher in R compared to NR and overall PSI was slightly higher in CRS/ICANS compared to no CRS/ICANS though the difference was not statistically significant. One limitation was a small sample size and thus testing PSI in a larger cohort might yield statistically significant results. The NR group had more high-risk cytogenetics and higher EM. One confounder could be that measuring peripheral T-cell fitness may not be sufficient to predict response in EM where spatial determinants of T-cell influx play a role.

Cardiovascular adverse events in patients with cancer treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy: A meta-analysis of both controlled and single-arm clinical trials.

e19006 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy presents a promising avenue in the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, the application of CAR-T cell therapy comes with a range of adverse effects, some of which are not fully understood yet. While previous research has primarily focused on immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANs) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the cardiovascular safety profile of CAR-T cell therapy remains less defined. This meta-analysis assesses the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events associated with CAR-T therapy, thereby providing critical insights into these events and guiding clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a Pubmed search of clinical trials evaluating the effect of CAR-T cell therapy in cancer patients with cardiovascular adverse events. For phase III trials, a quantitative assessment of Grade 3 or higher CV events was performed using the Review Manager (Rev-Man) Version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) and the results were reported as Odd Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI). A fixed effect model was used. For phase I/II trials, the event rates were calculated for all-grade as well as grade 3 and higher CV adverse events. Results: A total of four Phase III clinical trials with 1345 patients were included for the comparison analysis. Among those trials, two involved multiple myeloma patients, and two involved large B cell lymphoma patients. The age range across trials was 20-83 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1. The analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in Grade 3 or higher CV events between the CAR-T cell therapy and control (standard of care) groups: OR with 95% CI was 1.44 (0.73,2.82) (p=0.29). Grade 3 and above CV adverse event rates were 3.4% for the CAR-T and 2.1% for the control groups. Notably, there were two CV deaths in the CAR-T group and one CV death in the control group. Additionally, a total of 41 single-arm, Phase I/II clinical trials with 1479 participants were analyzed. Seven studies included solid cancers such as metastatic pancreatic cancer, biliary tract cancer and melanoma. The age range was 17-86 yr and male/female ratio was 1.5:1. Total all-grade CV adverse event rate was 21.83% and total grade 3 and above CV adverse event rate was 8.82%. There were eight CV deaths. Conclusions: There were significantly more CV adverse events reported in Phase I/II trials when compared to those reported in Phase III trials. This indicates that CV adverse events are important consequences of CAR-T cell therapy but are likely underreported in the Phase III clinical trials. Increased awareness and more standardized evaluation of CV adverse events of CAR-T is needed in the future clinical trials.

Management of complications of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: a report by the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

CAR-T cells are in standard clinical use to treat relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Owing to the rapidly progressing field of CAR-T cell therapy and the lack of generally accepted treatment guidelines, we hypothesized significant differences between European centers in prevention, diagnosis and management of short- and long-term complications. To capture the current CAR-T cell management among EBMT centers and to determine the medical need and specific areas for future clinical research the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party performed a survey among 227 EBMT CAR-T cell centers. We received complete servey answers from 106 centers (47%) addressing questions in the areas of product selection, CAR-T cell logistics, management of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome as well as management in later phases including prolonged cytopenias. We identified common patterns in complication management, but also significant variety in clinical management of the centers in important aspects. Our results demonstrate a high medical need for treatment harmonization and future clinical research in the following areas: treatment of steroid-refractory and very severe CRS/neurotoxicity, treatment of cytopenia, early discharge and outpatient management, as well as immunoglobulin substitution.

Prognostic impact of corticosteroid and tocilizumab use following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma.

Despite being the mainstay of management for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), there is limited data regarding the impact of tocilizumab (TCZ) and corticosteroids (CCS) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM). The present study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of these immunosuppressants in recipients of BCMA- or GPRC5D-directed CAR T cells for relapsed/refractory MM. Our retrospective cohort involved patients treated with commercial or investigational autologous CAR T-cell products at a single institution from March 2017-March 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and overall survival (OS). In total, 101 patients (91% treated with anti-BCMA CAR T cells and 9% treated with anti-GPRC5D CAR T cells) were analyzed. Within 30 days post-infusion, 34% received CCS and 49% received TCZ for CRS/ICANS management. At a median follow-up of 27.4 months, no significant difference in PFS was observed between CCS and non-CCS groups (log-rank p = 0.35) or between TCZ and non-TCZ groups (log-rank p = 0.69). ORR, CRR, and OS were also comparable between evaluated groups. In our multivariable model, administering CCS with/without TCZ for CRS/ICANS management did not independently influence PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.36-1.51). These findings suggest that, among patients with relapsed/refractory MM, the timely and appropriate use of CCS or TCZ for mitigating immune-mediated toxicities does not appear to impact the antitumor activity and long-term outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy.

Current progress of CAR-T-cell therapy for patients with multiple myeloma.

Currently available chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cell therapies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), namely, idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, have shown marked efficacy against relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. However, further improvement in CAR-T-cell function is warranted as most patients treated with these products eventually relapse due to various mechanisms such as antigen loss and T-cell dysfunction or disappearance. Strategies for improving CAR-T-cell function include targeting of dual antigens, enhancing cell longevity through genetic modification, and eliminating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Serious side effects can also occur after CAR-T-cell infusions. Although understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome is growing, the unique movement disorder caused by BCMA-targeted therapy is less understood, and its molecular mechanisms must be further elucidated to establish better management strategies. In this article, we will review the current status of BCMA-targeting CAR-T-cell therapy. We will also highlight progress in the development of CAR-T cells targeting other antigens, as well as universal allogeneic CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies.

Clinical evaluation and determinants of response to HBI0101 (BCMA CART) therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

AbstractHBI0101 is an academic chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART)–targeted to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM) and light chain amyloidosis. Herein, we present the phase 1b/2 results of 50 heavily pretreated patients with R/RMM dosed with 800 × 106 CART cells. Inclusion criteria were relatively permissive (i.e., performance status and baseline organ function) and consequently, approximately half of the enrolled patients would have been ineligible for pivotal clinical trials. The median time elapsed from patient enrollment until CART delivery was 25 days (range, 14-65). HBI0101-related toxicities included grade 1 to 3 cytokine release syndrome, grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities, and grade 1 to 2 immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Responses were achieved in 90% of the patients, 56% achieved stringent and complete response, and 70% reached a minimal residual disease negativity. Within a median follow-up of 12.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-14.6), and the overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 13.3 to not reached). Multivariable analysis on patient/disease and CART-related characteristics revealed that high-risk cytogenetic, extramedullary disease, and increased number of effector-memory T cells in CART products were independently associated with inferior PFS. In conclusion, comprehensive analyses of the parameters affecting the response to CART therapy are essential for improving patients’ outcome. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04720313.

Mechanisms and management of CAR T toxicity.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have dramatically improved treatment outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Despite unprecedented efficacy, treatment with CAR T cell therapies can cause a multitude of adverse effects which require monitoring and management at specialized centers and contribute to morbidity and non-relapse mortality. Such toxicities include cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, neurotoxicity distinct from ICANS, immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome, and immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity that can lead to prolonged cytopenias and infectious complications. This review will discuss the current understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and provide guidelines for the grading and management of such toxicities.

Current understanding and management of CAR T cell-associated toxicities.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of several haematological malignancies and is being investigated in patients with various solid tumours. Characteristic CAR T cell-associated toxicities such as cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are now well-recognized, and improved supportive care and management with immunosuppressive agents has made CAR T cell therapy safer and more feasible than it was when the first regulatory approvals of such treatments were granted in 2017. The increasing clinical experience with these therapies has also improved recognition of previously less well-defined toxicities, including movement disorders, immune effector cell-associated haematotoxicity (ICAHT) and immune effector cell-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), as well as the substantial risk of infection in patients with persistent CAR T cell-induced B cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinaemia. A more diverse selection of immunosuppressive and supportive-care pharmacotherapies is now being utilized for toxicity management, yet no universal algorithm for their application exists. AsCAR T cell products targeting new antigens are developed, additional toxicities involving damage to non-malignant tissues expressing the target antigen are a potential hurdle. Continued prospective evaluation of toxicity management strategies and the design of less-toxic CAR T cell products are both crucial for ongoing success in this field. In this Review, we discuss the evolving understanding and clinical management of CAR T cell-associated toxicities.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell infusion for large B-cell lymphoma in complete remission: a center for international blood and marrow transplant research analysis.

CD19 CAR T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is commonly administered to patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), but salvage or bridging therapy can sometimes lead to a complete response (CR) prior to infusion. Limited studies have assessed the outcomes of patients infused in CR. A total of 134 patients with LBCL in CR prior to CAR-T infusion were identified from the CIBMTR registry, with median prior lines of therapy of 3 (range 2-9). At two years post-infusion, the probability of progression-free survival was 43.5% (95% CI 34.4-52.8) and the probability of overall survival was 63.8% (95% CI 54.4-72.6). The cumulative incidence rates of non-relapse mortality and relapse/progression at two years were 9.2% (95% CI 4.5-15.4) and 47.3% (95% CI 38.2-56.6), respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were 2.2% and 8.2%, respectively. In summary, CAR-T in heavily pretreated patients with LBCL who are in CR following two or more lines of prior therapy demonstrate that a subset of patients may remain free of progression at two years. Additionally, the toxicity profile was impressive with very low rates of grade 3 CRS and ICANS.

Genetic Susceptibility in Endothelial Injury Syndromes after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Other Cellular Therapies: Climbing a Steep Hill.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a cornerstone in the management of patients with hematological malignancies. Endothelial injury syndromes, such as HSCT-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (HSCT-TMA), veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS/VOD), and capillary leak syndrome (CLS), constitute complications after HSCT. Moreover, endothelial damage is prevalent after immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) and can be manifested with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Our literature review aims to investigate the genetic susceptibility in endothelial injury syndromes after HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy. Variations in complement pathway- and endothelial function-related genes have been associated with the development of HSCT-TMA. In these genes, CFHR5, CFHR1, CFHR3, CFI, ADAMTS13, CFB, C3, C4, C5, and MASP1 are included. Thus, patients with these variations might have a predisposition to complement activation, which is also exaggerated by other factors (such as acute graft-versus-host disease, infections, and calcineurin inhibitors). Few studies have examined the genetic susceptibility to SOS/VOD syndrome, and the implicated genes include CFH, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, and heparinase. Finally, specific mutations have been associated with the onset of CRS (PFKFB4, CX3CR1) and ICANS (PPM1D, DNMT3A, TE2, ASXL1). More research is essential in this field to achieve better outcomes for our patients.

Targeting TGFβ-activated kinase-1 activation in microglia reduces CAR T immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

Cancer immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can cause immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). However, the molecular mechanisms leading to ICANS are not well understood. Here we examined the role of microglia using mouse models and cohorts of individuals with ICANS. CD19-directed CAR (CAR19) T cell transfer in B cell lymphoma-bearing mice caused microglia activation and neurocognitive deficits. The TGFβ-activated kinase-1 (TAK1)-NF-κB-p38 MAPK pathway was activated in microglia after CAR19 T cell transfer. Pharmacological TAK1 inhibition or genetic Tak1 deletion in microglia using Cx3cr1CreER:Tak1fl/fl mice resulted in reduced microglia activation and improved neurocognitive activity. TAK1 inhibition allowed for potent CAR19-induced antilymphoma effects. Individuals with ICANS exhibited microglia activation in vivo when studied by translocator protein positron emission tomography, and imaging mass cytometry revealed a shift from resting to activated microglia. In summary, we prove a role for microglia in ICANS pathophysiology, identify the TAK1-NF-κB-p38 MAPK axis as a pathogenic signaling pathway and provide a rationale to test TAK1 inhibition in a clinical trial for ICANS prevention after CAR19 T cell-based cancer immunotherapy.

Comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Relapse/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL) represents paediatric cancer with a challenging prognosis. CAR T-cell treatment, considered an advanced treatment, remains controversial due to high relapse rates and adverse events. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for r/r B-ALL. Methods The literature search was performed on four databases. Efficacy parameters included minimal residual disease negative complete remission (MRD-CR) and relapse rate (RR). Safety parameters constituted cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Results Anti-CD22 showed superior efficacy with the highest MRD-CR event rate and lowest RR, compared to anti-CD19. Combining CAR T-cell therapy with haploidentical stem cell transplantation improved RR. Safety-wise, bispecific anti-CD19/22 had the lowest CRS rate, and anti-CD22 showed the fewest ICANS. Analysis of the costimulatory receptors showed that adding CD28ζ to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses with favorable safety profiles. Conclusion Choosing a more efficacious and safer CAR T-cell treatment is crucial for improving overall survival in acute leukaemia. Beyond the promising anti-CD22 CAR T-cell, exploring costimulatory domains and new CD targets could enhance treatment effectiveness for r/r B-ALL.

Prolonged cytopenias after immune effector cell therapy and lymphodepletion in patients with leukemia, lymphoma and solid tumors

Background aimsThe success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in treating B-cell malignancies has led to the evaluation of CAR T-cells targeting a variety of other malignancies. Although the efficacy of CAR T-cells is enhanced when administered post-lymphodepleting chemotherapy, this can trigger bone marrow suppression and sustained cytopenia after CD19.CAR T-cell therapy. Additionally, systemic inflammation associated with CAR T-cell activity may contribute to myelosuppression. Cytopenias, such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, elevate the risk of severe infections and bleeding, respectively. However, data on the incidence of prolonged cytopenias after immune effector therapy in the solid tumor context remain limited. ObjectiveWe compared the incidence of prolonged cytopenias after immune effector therapy including genetically modified T-cells, virus-specific T-cells (VSTs) and NKT-cells, as well non-gene-modified VSTs for leukemia, lymphoma, and solid tumors (ST) to identify associated risk factors. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 112 pediatric and adult patients with relapsed and/or refractory cancers who received lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by immune effector therapy. Patients treated with 13 distinct immune effector cell therapies through 11 single-center clinical trials and 2 commercial products over a 6-year period were categorized into 3 types of malignancies: leukemia, lymphoma and ST. We obtained baseline patient characteristics and adverse events data for each participant, and tracked neutrophil and platelet counts following lymphodepletion. ResultsOf 112 patients, 104 (92.9%) experienced cytopenias and 88 (79%) experienced severe cytopenias. Patients with leukemia experienced significantly longer durations of severe neutropenia (median duration of 14 days) compared with patients with lymphoma (7 days) or ST (11 days) (P = 0.002). Patients with leukemia also had a higher incidence of severe thrombocytopenia (74.1%), compared with lymphoma (46%, P = 0.03) and ST (14.3%, P < 0.0001). Prolonged cytopenias were significantly associated with disease type (63% of patients with leukemia, 44% of patients with lymphoma, and 22.9% of patients with ST, P = 0.006), prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (66.7% with prior HSCT versus 38.3% without prior HSCT, P = 0.039), and development of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) (75% with ICANS versus 38% without ICANS, P = 0.027). There was no significant association between prolonged cytopenias and cytokine release syndrome. ConclusionsImmune effector recipients often experience significant cytopenias due to marrow suppression following lymphodepletion regardless of disease, but prolonged severe cytopenias are significantly less common after treatment of patients with lymphoma and solid tumors.

Outpatient administration of CAR T-cell therapy: a focused review with recommendations for implementation in community based centers.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for hematological malignancies, showing high efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease and otherwise poor prognosis in the pre-CAR-T era. These therapies have been usually administered in the inpatient setting due to the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). However, there is a growing interest in the transition to outpatient administration due to multiple reasons. We review available evidence regarding safety and feasibility of outpatient administration of CD19 targeted and BCMA targeted CAR T-cell therapy with an emphasis on the implementation of outpatient CAR-T programs in community-based centers.

Change in Neurocognitive Function in Patients Who Receive CAR-T Cell Therapies: A Steep Hill to Climb.

Immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies has brought substantial improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell neoplasms. However, complications such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) limit the therapeutic efficacy of this treatment approach. ICANS can have a broad range of clinical manifestations, while various scoring systems have been developed for its grading. Cognitive decline is prevalent in CAR-T therapy recipients including impaired attention, difficulty in item naming, and writing, agraphia, and executive dysfunction. In this review, we aim to present the diagnostic methods and tests that have been used for the recognition of cognitive impairment in these patients. Moreover, up-to-date data about the duration of cognitive impairment symptoms after the infusion are presented. More research on the risk factors, pathogenesis, preventive measures, and therapy of neurocognitive impairment is crucial for better outcomes for our patients.

Anticytokine Therapy and Corticosteroids for Cytokine Release Syndrome and for Neurotoxicity Following T-Cell Engager or CAR T-Cell Therapy

What Is the Issue? Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are the most common toxicities secondary to T-cell engager or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. The US FDA and Health Canada approved tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, for the management of severe or life-threatening cases of CRS. Corticosteroids also play an important role in CRS management and are the mainstay of ICANS management. Decision-makers are interested in understanding the use of anticytokine drugs (i.e., tocilizumab, anakinra, siltuximab) and/or corticosteroids in the management of CRS and ICANS following T-cell engager or CAR T-cell therapy. What Did We Do? We identified and summarized the literature comparing the clinical effectiveness and safety of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids with alternative care or treatment as usual for treating and preventing of CRS and ICANS. We also searched for evidence-based recommendations for the use of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids to treat and prevent CRS and ICANS. A research information specialist conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019 and February 26, 2024 for CRS; and between January 1, 2019 and March 4, 2024 for ICANS. One reviewer screened citations for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings. What Did We Find? This report presents evidence-based findings on 3 retrospective chart review studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 4 consensus guidelines. Limited and low-quality clinical evidence from studies with a high risk of bias suggested that early use of tocilizumab or corticosteroids, or prophylactic use of tocilizumab or anakinra may reduce the risk of a high-grade CRS without a negative impact on neurotoxicity or immunotherapy treatment outcomes. The included guidelines recommend the use of tocilizumab for treatment of higher-grade CRS, or for treatment of grade 1 CRS if symptoms persist for 3 days or more. Corticosteroids could be added in conjunction if there is no improvement or persistent symptoms after tocilizumab therapy. For the management of ICANS in the absence of concurrent CRS, supportive care is the preferred treatment option for grade 1 ICANS, while corticosteroids are recommended for the management of grade 2 to 4 ICANS. In the presence of concurrent CRS, guidelines recommend tocilizumab therapy as per management of CRS, and corticosteroids should be continued until improvement to grade 1. We did not identify any clinical evidence regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids for treatment of CRS and ICANS compared with alternative treatment or treatment as usual. We also did not identify any guidelines for the use of prophylactic anticytokine therapy, corticosteroids, or both for the prevention of CRS and ICANS. What Does This Mean? Despite limited and low-quality evidence, the findings suggest some potential benefits of prophylactic or early use of anticytokine therapy and corticosteroids for the management of immunotherapy-related toxicities. Guidelines offer guidance on the management of CRS, ICANS and other less common toxicities related to immunotherapy based on the available low-quality evidence. When using the clinical evidence and recommendations summarized in this report to inform decisions, decision-makers should consider that the evidence is limited and of low quality. To improve the certainty of findings, there is a need for more robust prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes, and lower risk of bias.

Growth Factor in the Setting of CAR T-Cell Therapy: To Use or Not to Use

Patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may experience side effects including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), neutropenia, and infection. Growth factor has historically been used to treat neutropenia; however, its role in CAR T-cell therapy is not well explained. Existing data on the safety and efficacy of growth factor are conflicting. The purpose of this integrative review was to explore the safety and efficacy of growth factor in adult patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing CAR T-cell therapy. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing &amp; Allied Health (CINAHL), and Scopus databases. A total of 2,635 articles were retrieved. Four studies were included that looked at the use of growth factor in the CAR T-cell setting. Safety outcomes evaluated included CRS, ICANS, neutropenic fever and/or infection, and neutropenia duration. Efficacy outcomes evaluated included CAR T-cell expansion and treatment response. The literature suggests that growth factor may not increase CRS prevalence, but may lead to an increased grade of CRS, namely grade 2. Growth factor administration does not have any association with ICANS toxicity, CAR T-cell expansion, or treatment response. Its use may not necessarily lead to decreased infection rates but may shorten the duration of neutropenia. Practice implications for providers working with this unique patient population include using growth factor early in the course of CAR T-cell therapy as treatment to shorten the duration of neutropenia rather than infection prophylaxis.

Real-world experience of commercial relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) for relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in China

BackgroundRelapsed/refractory (R/R) central nervous system lymphomas (CNSLs) are associated with a poor prognosis. Relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel), expressing the same chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) as lisocabtagene maraleucel, with an optimized commercial-ready...

EEG before chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and early after onset of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome

BackgroundImmune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is common after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the impact of preinfusion electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities and EEG findings at ICANS onset for predicting ICANS risk and severity in 56 adult patients with refractory lymphoma undergoing CAR-T therapy. Study designEEGs were conducted at the time of lymphodepleting chemotherapy and shortly after onset of ICANS. ResultsTwenty-eight (50%) patients developed ICANS at a median time of 6 days after CAR-T infusion. Abnormal preinfusion EEG was identified as a risk factor for severe ICANS (50% vs. 17%, P = 0.036). Following ICANS onset, EEG abnormalities were detected in 89% of patients [encephalopathy (n = 19, 70%) and/or interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) (n = 14, 52%)]. Importantly, IEDs seemed to be associated with rapid progression to higher grades of ICANS within 24 h. ConclusionsIf confirmed in a large cohort of patients, these findings could establish the basis for modifying current management guidelines, enabling the identification of patients at risk of neurotoxicity, and providing support for preemptive corticosteroid use in patients with both initial grade 1 ICANS and IEDs at neurotoxicity onset, who are at risk of neurological impairment.

Infectious complications in pediatric patients undergoing CD19+CD22+ chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-lymphoblastic leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL); however, patients who receive CAR-T therapy are predisposed to infections, with considerable detrimental effects on long-term survival rates and the quality of life of patients. This study retrospectively analyzed infectious complications in 79 pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL treated with CAR-T cells at our institution. Overall, 53 patients developed 88 infections. Nine patients experienced nine infections during lymphodepletion chemotherapy, 35 experienced 41 infections during the early phase (days 0–+ 30 after infusion), and 29 experienced 38 infections during the late phase (day + 31–+ 90 after infusion). Pathogens were identified in 31 infections, including 23 bacteria, seven viruses, and one fungus. Four patients were admitted to the intensive care unit for infection and one died. In a univariate analysis, there were ten factors associated with infection, including tumor load, lymphodepleting chemotherapy, neutrophil deficiency and lymphocyte reduction, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), etc. In a multivariate analysis, CRS ≥ grade 3 was identified as a risk factor for infection (hazard ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.08–5.36, P = 0.031). Therefore, actively reducing the CRS grade may decrease the risk of infection and improve the long-term quality of life of these patients.