This study involved an interpretation of wire-line logs in assessing the hydrocarbon capacity of the sandstone reservoir within the gas fields of Kadanwari, Sindh, Pakistan. Wire-line logs from four wells (KD-01, KD-03, KD-10 and KD-11) were used in our research and provided interpretation for thirteen reservoir zones. Reservoir analyses were done for effective porosity (ϕeff), shale content (Vsh), net pay thickness variations, water saturation, and hydrocarbon (Sw and Shc). Hydrocarbon-bearing zones consist of high values of resistivity, permeability, porosity, low water saturation content, and less shale content, indicating the presence of clean sand. The Thomas Stieber model findings show that in lower Goru sand, the laminated form of shale distribution persists. Sub-reservoirs’ petrophysical parameters were analyzed and ranked into a good sand reservoir quality (having ϕeff ∼0.11-0.44%), permeability (∼10.539-477.76 mD), hydrocarbon saturation (having Shc ∼0.59-0.86%), and water saturation (having Sw ∼0.18-0.45%). In the current research Indonesian model has been used to test for water saturation over a shaly-sand reservoir situated in a heterogeneous zone. It was observed that each well exhibited Sw at values lesser than 60%. This is indicative the selected zone has a hydrocarbon potential, and the hydrocarbons are of good quality. Isoparametric maps and crossplots of litho-saturation results reveal variations in the horizontal and vertical petrophysical parameters of the reservoir. The subsurface reservoir geographical distribution is visualized employing isoparametric maps. The fuel treasure in the southwestern section of the study area is enormous, as revealed by the petrophysical investigations, suggesting more well-drilling prospects in the gas fields of the lower Goru Formation situated in Kadanwari. Our research identified a quality hydrocarbon hotspot zone of immense economic value in Southern Kadanwari. In contrast, more research is needed regarding the northeastern section though our present findings suggest the northeastern section should be avoided because of excess shale and high-water concentrations.