Previous articleNext article No AccessImitation and Evolution: The Discussion of Rhetorical Imitation in Cicero De Oratore 2. 87-97 and Some Related Problems of Ciceronian TheoryElaine FanthamElaine Fantham Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Classical Philology Volume 73, Number 1Jan., 1978 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/366388 Views: 447Total views on this site Citations: 12Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1978 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jamey E. Graham Mimesis, Economy, and Civilization in Shakespeare’s All’s Well That Ends Well, Modern Philology 116, no.11 (Jul 2018): 20–44.https://doi.org/10.1086/697600 Bibliography, (Nov 2011): 529–564.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444354188.biblioSteven H. Rutledge Tacitus' Dialogus de Oratoribus, (Nov 2011): 62–83.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444354188.ch4Charles Guérin La persona oratoire entre rhétorique, biographie et histoire, Interférences , no.55 (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.4000/interferences.897John Muckelbauer Imitation and Invention in Antiquity: An Historical-Theoretical Revision, Rhetorica 21, no.22 (May 2003): 61–88.https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2003.21.2.61Elaine Fantham The Concept of Nature and Human Nature in Quintilian's Psychology and Theory of Instruction, Rhetorica 13, no.22 (May 1995): 125–136.https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1995.13.2.125George Alexander Kennedy The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, 27 (Mar 2008).https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063George A. Kennedy The evolution of a theory of artistic prose, (Jan 1990): 184–199.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063.006George A. Kennedy, Doreen C. Innes Hellenistic literary and philosophical scholarship, (Jan 1990): 200–219.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063.007Elaine Fantham The growth of literature and criticism at Rome, (Jan 1990): 220–244.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063.008Dorren C. Innes Augustan Critics, (Jan 1990): 245–273.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063.009Elaine Fantham Latin Criticism of the Early Empire, (Jan 1990): 274–296.https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063.010
Read full abstract