Imaging In Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Research Articles

A clinical perspective on imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

In recent years, imaging has become increasingly important to confirm diagnosis, monitor disease activity, and predict disease course and outcome in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Over the past few decades, great efforts have been made to improve the quality of diagnostic imaging and to reach a consensus on which methods and scoring systems to use. However, there are still some critical issues, and the diagnosis, course, and management of JIA are closely related to clinical assessment. This review discusses the main indications for conventional radiography (XR), musculoskeletal ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), while trying to maintain a clinical perspective. The diagnostic-therapeutic timing at which one or the other method should be used, depending on the disease/patient phenotype, will be assessed, considering the main advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality according to the currently available literature. Some brief clinical case scenarios on the most frequently and severely involved joints in JIA are also presented.Graphical abstract

Early diagnosis of temporomandibular joint arthritis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. A systematic review.

Asymptomatic TMJ arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients may cause damage and deformity of the joint. The clinical manifestation of early-stage TMJ arthritis is not characteristic. Clinical findings commonly appear in a late stage of TMJ involvement, but they can also be masked by antirheumatic therapy. The absence of clinical symptoms, and the lack or insufficient clinical signs do not provide reliable information about the TMJ involvement. The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review of the evidence for clinical symptoms and signs of early-stage TMJ arthritis, as well as for correlation between clinical parameters and TMJ abnormalities imaging in JIA patients. Study design: A systematic review of papers published from 1998 to 2019 regarding early clinical and imaging findings of TMJ arthritis in JIA patients. The search resulted in 292 studies. Eleven publications were included in the review. Clinical signs and symptoms do not allow to detect the early stage of TMJ arthritis in JIA patients. To monitor individual orofacial development, periodic TMJ clinical examination should be a part of an evaluation of JIA children's growth. There is a need to develop clinical management guidelines, as well as diagnosis standards of clinical and imaging TMJ examination for JIA children, considering their developmental age.

Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliitis in children: frequency of findings and interobserver reliability

BackgroundClinicians increasingly rely on imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to identify sacroiliitis and guide treatment. However, there is limited evidence about magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for sacroiliitis in children, and interobserver reliability is variable.ObjectiveIdentify the frequency of MRI findings in children with suspected sacroiliitis, calculate inter-reporter reliability and assess the value of diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced sequences.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 3 years of sacroiliac joint MRI records for suspected sacroiliitis in patients <21 years at a United Kingdom tertiary referral paediatric hospital. Five radiologists (panel of three radiologists and two independent radiologists) reviewed all MRI examinations using a pictorial checklist to identify oedema, effusions, diffusion-weighted signal abnormality, enhancement, erosions and sclerosis. The frequency of panel findings was reported. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the Cohen kappa coefficient.ResultsAn MRI diagnosis of sacroiliitis was made in 12 of 99 examinations (12%). The findings in all scans included oedema (9%), erosions (8%), diffusion-weighted signal abnormality (6%), abnormal enhancement (6%) and effusion (4%). All scans with abnormal contrast enhancement had other MRI features of sacroiliitis. Interobserver agreement was slight to moderate.ConclusionOedema and erosions were the most common findings. Inter-reporter reliability was variable with at best moderate agreement for the presence of sacroiliitis and erosions. The use of contrast enhancement for diagnosing sacroiliitis in children with JIA may be questionable.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis - the role of imaging from a rheumatologist's perspective.

Alongside recent advances in treatment strategies for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), paediatric rheumatologists have taken increasing interest in the use of imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and musculoskeletal ultrasound, by providing more detailed information on disease activity than clinical examination and conventional radiography (CR), have become helpful diagnostic and managerial tools. The growing skeleton, however, with changing appearances over time, is still challenging in the establishment of valid scoring systems for pathological changes. Defining child- and age-specific reference standards is therefore a highly prioritized issue. The aim of this article is to raise awareness among radiologists of the substantial role that imaging can play to optimize the management of JIA patients and to describe the state-of-the-art validation process of imaging as an outcome measure. A closer collaboration between radiologists and pediatric rheumatologists is crucial to define a scheduled workflow for imaging in JIA.

Current status of wrist imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Wrist involvement occurs in about one-quarter of patients diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), increasing to 40% 5 years after diagnosis. The imaging appearances, both for active inflammation and permanent change, differ from those seen in adult rheumatoid arthritis; therefore, a child-specific approach is crucial for correct assessment. In this review article, we provide an update on the current status for imaging wrist JIA, with a focus on evidence-based practice.

Imaging of the hip in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Hip involvement is common and estimated to occur in approximately 35-63% of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). It is more prevalent in the aggressive systemic subtypes, with irreversible changes occurring as early as within 5years of diagnosis. Whilst clinical parameters and joint examination can be useful for assessing disease severity, subclinical disease is known to exist and delayed treatment may herald a lifetime of disability and pain. Early recognition of JIA changes is therefore crucial in determining treatment options. Validated scoring systems in the radiologic assessment of the hip for clinical drug trials may inform treatment outcomes, although robust tools for analysis are still lacking. This review article details the modalities utilised for imaging the hip in children with JIA with particular efforts focused upon reliability and validity in their assessment of joint disease. We conclude with a short literature review on the potential future techniques being developed for hip joint imaging in JIA.

EULAR-PReS points to consider for the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in clinical practice

To develop evidence based points to consider the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in clinical practice. The task force comprised a group...

Frequency of joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis during a 5-year follow-up of newly diagnosed patients: implications for MR imaging as outcome measure.

To assess the sequence and type of active joints in a cohort of newly diagnosed juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients with full access to current treatment at first visit and during a follow-up period of 5-years, in order to identify an index joint/group of joints for magnetic resonance imaging in JIA. Patient charts of all consecutive newly diagnosed JIA patients with a follow-up duration of at least 5 years were analyzed. Patients were derived from two tertiary pediatric rheumatology centers. Patient characteristics and data concerning the presence of joints with arthritis and the use of medication were recorded. Findings from 95 JIA patients [39 (41 %) oligoarticular and 56 (59 %) polyarticular] were analyzed. At first visit, distribution of active joints among patients was as follows: knee (n = 70, 74 %), ankle (n = 55, 58 %), elbow (n = 23, 24 %), wrist (n = 23, 24 %), metacarpophalangeal (MCP) (n = 20, 21 %), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) (n = 13, 14 %), hip (n = 6, 6 %), shoulder (n = 5, 5 %), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) (n = 4, 4 %) joints. After a follow-up period of 5 years, the cumulative percentage of patients with specific joint involvement changed into: knee (n = 88, 93 %), ankle (n = 79, 83 %), elbow (n = 43, 45 %), wrist (n = 38, 40 %), MCP (n = 36, 38 %), PIP (n = 29, 31 %), shoulder (n = 20, 21 %), hip (n = 17, 19 %), and DIP (n = 9, 10 %) joints. Despite changes in treatment strategies over the years, the knee remains the most commonly involved joint at onset and during follow-up in JIA, followed by the ankle, elbow, and wrist. For the evaluation of outcome with MRI, the knee appears the most appropriate joint in JIA.

Heading Toward a Modern Imaging Approach in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

MR imaging and musculoskeletal ultrasound are expanding their utility in the assessment of patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis. These imaging techniques, by providing additional and more sensitive information over clinical examination and conventional radiographs, are promising tools for the diagnosis, prognosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Owing to the peculiarities of the growing skeleton, knowledge of imaging in healthy children is of high priority. A sound understanding of growth-related changes is of foremost value in establishing whether the apparent changes on joint surface reflect real damage or are actually part of normal development. This review explores current evidence and suggests a new workflow for imaging in JIA, in which conventional and modern imaging modalities can be integrated for optimal management.

Imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): an update with particular emphasis on MRI

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous condition encompassing all forms of chronic arthritis of unknown origin and with onset before 16 years of age. During the last decade new, potent therapeutic agents have become available, underscoring the need for accurate monitoring of therapeutic response on both disease activity and structural damage to the joint. However, so far, treatment efficacy is based on clinical ground only, although clinical parameters are poor markers for disease activity and progression of structural damage. Not so for rheumatoid arthritis patients where the inclusion of radiographic assessment has been required by FDA to test the disease-modifying potential of new anti-rheumatic drugs. In imaging of children with JIA there has been a shift from traditional radiography towards newer techniques such as ultrasound and MRI, however without proper evaluation of their accuracy and validity. We here summarize present knowledge and discuss future challenges in imaging children with JIA.

Magnetic resonance imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Peculiarities of imaging children

The term juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) encompasses a heterogeneous group of arthritides with no known cause that begin before the age of 16 years and persist for at least 6 weeks. In recent decades, imaging techniques have acquired a fundamental role in the diagnosis and follow-up of JIA, owing to the unification of the different criteria for classification, which has strengthened the research in this field, and to the development of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. In this article, we briefly explain what JIA is. Moreover, we describe the role and limitations of plain-film radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Finally, we review the MRI protocol and findings, and we comment on the differential diagnosis.

Comparison of ultrasonography with Doppler and MRI for assessment of disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study

BackgroundIn juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the trend towards early therapeutic intervention and the development of new highly effective treatments have increased the need for sensitive and specific imaging. Numerous studies have demonstrated the important role of MRI and US in adult rheumatology. However, investigations of imaging in JIA are rare, and no previous study has been comparing MRI with Doppler ultrasonography (US) for assessment of arthritis. The aim of the present study was to compare the two imaging methods regarding their usefulness for evaluating disease activity in JIA, and to compare the results with those obtained in healthy controls.MethodsIn 10 JIA patients (median age 14 years, range 11–18), 11 joints (six wrists, three knees, two ankles) with arthritis were assessed by color Doppler US and MRI. The same imaging modalities were used to evaluate eight joints (three wrists, three knees, two ankles) in six healthy age- and sex-matched controls. The US examinations of both the patients and controls were compared with the MRI findings.ResultsIn 10 JIA patients, US detected synovial hypertrophy in 22 areas of 11 joints, 86% of which had synovial hyperemia, and MRI revealed synovitis in 36 areas of the same 11 joints. Erosions were identified by US in two areas of two joints and by MRI in six areas of four joints. Effusion was shown by US in nine areas of six joints and by MRI in 17 areas of five joints. MRI detected juxta-articular bone marrow edema in 16 areas of eight joints.ConclusionsThe results of this pilot study indicate that both MRI and US provide valuable imaging information on disease activity in JIA. Importantly, the two techniques seem to complement each other and give partly different information. Although MRI is considered to be the reference standard for advanced imaging in adult rheumatology, US seems to provide useful imaging information that could make it an option in daily clinical practice, in JIA as well as in adult rheumatology. However, the current work represents a pilot study, and thus our results need to be confirmed in a larger prospective clinical investigation.

Advances and challenges in imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Imaging assessments of the joints of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are challenging, owing to the unique features of the growing skeleton. Traditionally, imaging studies in childhood arthritis have been based on conventional radiography. However, in the past few years, interest in the use of MRI and ultrasonography has increased. As a result, imaging has become a main area of clinical and research investigation in paediatric rheumatology. The chief advance in the field of conventional radiography has been the development and validation of paediatric scoring systems for the assessment of radiographic progression. Several studies have shown that MRI provides a precise quantification of synovitis in children with JIA. Furthermore, a high frequency of bone marrow oedema and bone erosions has been found early in the disease course. Ultrasonography has been proven to be superior to clinical examination in detecting synovitis, tenosynovitis and enthesitis. A high frequency of subclinical synovitis has been demonstrated in patients with JIA who have clinically inactive disease using both MRI and ultrasonography. However, more information from healthy children is needed to enable differentiation of the bone and cartilage abnormalities that reflect damage from those that are part of normal development using MRI or ultrasonography. This Review provides a summary of the current information on conventional radiography, ultrasonography and MRI in JIA and highlights the advantages and limitations of each imaging modality.