Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention

BackgroundIn patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains unclear whether intravascular imaging guidance or functional guidance is the best strategy to optimize outcomes and if the results are different in patients with vs without acute coronary syndromes (ACS). ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes with imaging-guided PCI or functionally guided PCI when compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. MethodsWe searched PUBMED and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials investigating outcomes with intravascular imaging-guided, functionally guided, or angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcome from this network meta-analysis was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)—a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). PCI strategies were ranked (best to worst) using P scores. ResultsOur search identified 32 eligible randomized controlled trials and included a total of 22,684 patients. Compared with angiography-guided PCI, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with reduced risk of MACE (relative risk [RR]: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62-0.82), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.42-0.75), MI (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.73), and TLR (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.57-0.99). Similarly, when compared with angiography-guided PCI, functionally guided PCI was associated with reduced risk of MACE and MI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI ranked first for the outcomes of MACE, cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, and TLR. The results were consistent in the ACS and non-ACS cohorts. ConclusionsAngiography-guided PCI had consistently worse outcomes compared with intravascular imaging-guided and functionally guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was the best strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound

BackgroundOptical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, their comparative effectiveness in complex coronary artery lesions remains unclear. ObjectivesThis study compared the effectiveness and safety of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions. MethodsThis was a prespecified, main subgroup analysis of complex coronary artery lesions in the OCTIVUS (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, which included unprotected left main disease, bifurcation disease, an aorto-ostial lesion, a chronic total occlusion, a severely calcified lesion, an in-stent restenotic lesion, a diffuse long lesion, or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. ResultsIn 2,008 randomized patients, 1,475 (73.5%) underwent imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions; 719 (48.7%) received OCT-guided and 756 (51.3%) IVUS-guided PCI. At a median follow-up of 2.0 years, primary endpoint event had occurred in 47 patients (6.5%) in the OCT-guided group and in 56 patients (7.4%) in the IVUS-guided group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.59-1.29; P = 0.50). These findings were consistent in adjusted analyses. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar between the 2 groups (1.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.46). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (1.7% vs 3.4%; P = 0.03). ConclusionsAmong patients with complex coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI showed a similar risk of primary composite event of death from cardiac causes, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization as compared with IVUS-guided PCI. (Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [OCTIVUS]; NCT03394079)

TCT-108 Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Coronary Lesions and Chronic Kidney Disease

TCT-108 Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Coronary Lesions and Chronic Kidney Disease

Prognostic Impact of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Total Occlusion.

Prognostic Impact of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Total Occlusion.

Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve– or Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BackgroundA recent randomized trial reported fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy was noninferior to the intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI strategy with respect to clinical outcomes with fewer revascularizations. ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the sex differences in treatment and clinical outcomes according to physiology- or imaging-guided PCI strategies. MethodsIn this secondary analysis of the FLAVOUR (Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasonography to Guide PCI) trial, the impact of sex on procedural characteristics, PCI rate, and outcomes according to different strategies and treatment types (PCI vs deferral of PCI) was analyzed. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 24 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. ResultsOf 1,619 patients, 30% were women. Compared with men, women had a smaller minimal lumen area, smaller plaque burden, and higher FFR. They had a lower PCI rate (40.8% vs 47.9%; P = 0.008), which was mainly contributed by FFR guidance. Overall, women showed a lower TVF rate (2.4% vs 4.5%). According to the treatment type, the cumulative incidence of TVF was lower in women than in men among those with the deferral of PCI (1.7% vs 5.2%). However, this trend was not observed in patients who underwent PCI. In both women and men, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies. ConclusionsIn cases of intermediate stenosis, despite receiving fewer interventions, women had more favorable outcomes than men. The use of FFR led to a lower PCI rate but had a similar prognostic value compared with IVUS in both women and men.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the comparative effectiveness of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI regarding clinical outcomes is unknown. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic trial, we randomly assigned 2008 patients with significant coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either an OCT-guided or IVUS-guided PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year, which was powered for noninferiority of the OCT group compared with the IVUS group. Safety outcomes were also assessed. At 1 year, primary end point events occurred in 25 of 1005 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 2.5%) in the OCT group and in 31 of 1003 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 3.1%) in the IVUS group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points; upper boundary of one-sided 97.5% CI, 0.97 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was similar (14 patients [1.4%] in the OCT group versus 15 patients [1.5%] in the IVUS group; P=0.85). The incidence of major procedural complications was lower in the OCT group than in the IVUS group (22 [2.2%] versus 37 [3.7%]; P=0.047), although imaging procedure-related complications were not observed. In patients with significant coronary artery lesions, OCT-guided PCI was noninferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to the incidence of a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. The selected study population and lower-than-expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial. URL: https://www. gov; Unique number: NCT03394079.

Trends and impact of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography on percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction.

Intravascular imaging with either intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved outcomes, but these techniques have previously been underutilized in the real world. We aimed to examine the change in utilization of intravascular imaging-guided PCI over the past decade in the United States and assess the association between intravascular imaging and clinical outcomes following PCI for myocardial infarction (MI). We surveyed the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2019 to calculate the number of PCIs for MI guided by IVUS or OCT. Temporal trends were analyzed using Cochran-Armitage trend test or simple linear regression for categorical or continuous outcomes, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes following PCI with and without intravascular imaging. A total of 2,881,746 PCIs were performed for MI. The number of IVUS-guided PCIs increased by 309.9% from 6,180 in 2008 to 25,330 in 2019 (P-trend<0.001). The percentage of IVUS use in PCIs increased from 3.4% in 2008 to 8.7% in 2019 (P-trend<0.001). The number of OCT-guided PCIs increased 548.4% from 246 in 2011 to 1,595 in 2019 (P-trend<0.001). The percentage of OCT guidance in all PCIs increased from 0.0% in 2008 to 0.6% in 2019 (P-trend<0.001). Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.72, p<0.001). Although the number of intravascular imaging-guided PCIs have been increasing, adoption of intravascular imaging remains poor despite an association with lower mortality.

Angiography alone versus angiography plus intracoronary imaging to guide emergency percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes from a single-centre retrospective analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background There is emerging evidence showing improvement in clinical outcomes with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Yet data supporting their use in emergency setting are still conflicting. Purpose We aim to compare the immediate angiographic outcomes, short and long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing emergency PCI with intracoronary imaging to those with angiography guidance only. Methods We included 426 patients from May 2012 to December 2020 who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent emergency PCI within 24 hours of hospital admission. Intracoronary imaging was used in 196 of them to guide PCI. Immediate angiographic outcomes in terms of TIMI flow grade (TFG), myocardial blush grade (MBG) and corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) are compared. Clinical outcomes including major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality were also compared. Results 196 patients (46%) underwent intracoronary imaging-guided PCI. Use of imaging was associated with a higher post procedural CTFC (27.0 vs. 25.8, p=0.11), yet it failed to reach statistical significance. Comparing with angiography-guided PCI, imaging-guided PCI was associated with significantly larger proportion of high CTFC post procedure (slow coronary flow) (OR, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.38-1.0, P=0.05), and this result was consistent after adjustment of variables (adjusted OR, 0.57; 95% CI 0.34-0.98, P=0.04). Subjective measures of TIMI flow grade and MBG, however, were not different between the 2 groups. In the subgroup of patients with high Syntax score and American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) type C culprit lesion morphology, imaging guided PCI was associated with significantly worse post procedural MBG (OR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.17-0.78, P=0.01 vs. OR, 0.40; 95% CI 0.18-0.94, P=0.04), and the results were consistent after adjusting for variables. In the subgroup of patients with high Syntax score, imaging guided PCI was associated with significantly worse post procedural TIMI flow grade (adjusted OR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.12-0.95, P=0.05) and a trend towards higher CTFC (adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.06-0.94, P=0.05) after adjusting for variables. The cumulative incidences of all clinical outcome measures were not significantly different between the 2 groups before and after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions Imaging-guided PCI was not associated with improved angiographic or clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI who underwent emergency PCI. Use of intracoronary imaging in emergency PCI may associate with worse immediate angiographic outcomes.

Real-world comparison of intracoronary imaging and fractional flow reserve measurements on outcomes of semi-urgent and elective percutaneous coronary intervention in a multi-ethnic asian population

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Intracoronary imaging and fractional flow reserve measurements (FFR) are helpful in optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with stable coronary artery disease, but their comparative efficacy is not well described. Furthermore, few studies involve Asian patients in a real-world context. Purpose This study aims to compare the use of intracoronary imaging and fractional flow reserve measurements on the outcomes of semi-urgent and elective PCI in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Methods This was a retrospective database study of patients who underwent semi-urgent and elective PCI from 1st Jan 2014 to 31st Dec 2015 at a tertiary academic centre. The patients were split into 2 groups – imaging-guided (IG) consisting of intravascular ultrasound guided PCI or optical coherence tomography guided PCI and physiology-guided (PG) which included FFR-guided PCI. Patients who underwent both IG PCI and PG PCI were excluded. Incidence rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (Subsequent myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure, all-cause mortality) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (Subsequent myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack and all-cause mortality) were compared between the two groups. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for potential bias. Results Of 1,732 patients studied, the median age was 61.0 years (IQR 53.0 to 68.0) and 336 were female (19.4%). There were 266 patients (15.4%) in IG and 186 (10.7%) in PG. The patients were followed up for 33 ±37 months. A total of 133 pairs were matched. In the unmatched cohort, there was no statistical difference between the IG and PG group in the incidence of MACE (24.2% vs 15.5%, p= 0.099) and MACCE (26.6% vs 17.7%, p= 0.112). Baseline and procedural characteristics were balanced between the IG and PG groups. In the matched cohort, the incidence rates of MACE (11.3% vs 7.5%, p= 0.383) and MACCE (15.8% vs 12.8%, p=0.596) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion In a real-world multi-ethnic Asian registry of semi-urgent and elective PCI patients, there was no difference in outcomes whether patients underwent the use of intracoronary imaging or fractional flow reserve measurements during PCI.

Does Intravascular Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Does Intravascular Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Abstract 11766: Impact of Increasing Stent Length on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Undergoing Intracoronary Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents

Background: While longer stent length of first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) has been associated with stent-related adverse events, the association between stent length of new-generation DES and clinical outcomes remains controversial. Methods and Results: Consecutive 1403 patients including 2277 lesions who underwent intracoronary imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with 2nd- and 3rd-generation DES were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to total stent length (TSL), and followed up for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization (TLR) for patients. Lesions were divided into two groups according to TSL as well, and followed up for TLR and stent thrombosis. In the per patient analysis, long TSL group (TSL ≥ 32 mm, n = 703) had higher prevalence of diabetes (54.5% vs. 45.2%, P &amp;lt 0.001), anemia (48.4% vs. 43.0%, P = 0.042), peripheral artery disease (&amp;lt% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.003), multi-vessel disease (64.7% vs. 36.2%, P &amp;lt 0.001) and chronic total occlusion (9.5% vs 3.4%, P 0.001) than short TSL group (TSL &amp;lt 32 mm, n = 691). In the follow up period (mean of 1528 days), MACE and TLR were significantly higher in long TSL group than in short TSL group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.037, respectively). In the multivariate analysis after adjusting for confounding factors, the long TSL was an independent predictor of MACE and TLR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59, P = 0.002 and HR 1.74, P = 0.047). In the per lesion analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that TLR was significantly higher in long TSL group (TSL ≥ 26 mm, n = 1160) than short TSL group (TSL &lt; 26mm, n = 1117) (P = 0.017), while stent thrombosis was comparable between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, TLR was an independent predictor of TLR (HR 1.62, P = 0.029). Conclusion: Longer stent length of new-generation DES was associated with MACE and TLR, but not with stent thrombosis.

Four-Year Outcomes of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with a Bioresorbable Scaffold in the Circumflex Ostium.

The study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of a double stent scaffold strategy in patients with left main (LM) bifurcation lesions involving the ostium of the left circumflex artery (LCX), utilizing a drug-eluting stent (DES) in the LM extending into the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in the LCX ostium. The high occurrence of in-stent restenosis of the LCX ostium is the major limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for LM lesions with a two-stent strategy. This was a single-center, prospective, single-arm study of 46 consecutively enrolled patients with a stable coronary artery disease and significant unprotected LM distal bifurcation disease. Patients underwent imaging-guided PCI using DES in the LM-LAD and BVS in the LCX using a T-stent or mini-crush technique. The primary outcome at four years was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). At four years, the primary outcome was identified in 9 patients (19.6%). All events were TLRs except one myocardial infarction due to BVS thrombosis. Seven of the eight TLRs were a result of side branch BVS restenosis. Univariate predictors of the 4-year outcome were higher LDL cholesterol and BVS size ≤2.5 mm. On multivariate analysis, LCX lesion preparation with a cutting balloon and post-procedure use of intravascular ultrasound for optimization were found to be independent protective factors of MACE. In selected patients with LM distal bifurcation disease, an imaging-guided double stent scaffold strategy with DES in the LM and BVS in the LCX ostium was technically successful in all patients and was reasonably safe and effective for four years.

Clinical Outcomes Following Hemodynamic Parameter or Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents: An Updated Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 28 Randomized Trials and 11,860 Patients

BackgroundCoronary angiography (CAG) is the standard imaging modality for guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Intracoronary imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), and hemodynamic parameter like fractional flow reserve (FFR) can overcome some limitations of CAG.ObjectiveWe sought to explore the clinical outcomes of different PCI guidance modalities in the era of drug-eluting stent (DES).MethodsA network meta-analysis of 28 randomized trials and 11,860 patients undergoing different modalities-guided PCI in the era of DES was performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI) were calculated.ResultsIn comparison with CAG, IVUS was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, OR: 0.60; 95% CrI: 0.46–0.79), cardiovascular death (OR: 0.46; 95% CrI: 0.20–0.94), target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR, OR: 0.55; 95% CrI: 0.41–0.74), and a trend toward decreased risk of stent thrombosis (OR: 0.44; 95% CrI: 0.17 to 1.00). FFR/quantitative flow ratio (QFR) could significantly reduce stroke compared with CAG, IVUS, and OCT/optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI). However, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death, stent thrombosis, and any revascularization presented similar risks for different PCI guidance modalities.ConclusionIn the era of DES, IVUS led to lower risks of MACE than CAG, which was mainly due to lower risks of cardiovascular death and TVR/TLR. A trend toward decreased risk of stent thrombosis was also observed with IVUS. Hemodynamic parameter (FFR/QFR)-guided PCI could significantly reduce the stroke risk compared with CAG, IVUS, and OCT/OFDI.Systematic Review Registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42021291442].

Survivals of Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Proportion of Intracoronary Imaging at Population Level: The Imaging Paradox.

BackgroundThere is a significant disparity between randomized controlled trials and observational studies with respect to any mortality benefit with intracoronary imaging during the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This raises a suspicion that the imaging paradox, in which some operators may become over reliant on imaging and less proficient with angiography-guided PCI, might exist.MethodThis was a retrospective cohort study from 14 hospitals under the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2017. Participants were patients who underwent first-ever PCI. The association between mortality risks of patients undergoing angiography-guided PCI and three tertiles (low, medium, and high) of the proportion of PCI done under intracoronary imaging guidance at a population level (background imaging rate), were evaluated after confounder adjustment by multivariable logistic regression.ResultsIn an adjusted analysis of 11,816 patients undergoing angiography-guided PCI, the risks of all-cause mortality for those were higher in the high-tertile group compared with the low-tertile group (OR, 1.45, 95% CI, 1.10–1.92, P = 0.008), the risks of cardiovascular mortality were higher in the high-tertile group compared with the low-tertile group (OR, 1.51, 95% CI, 1.08–2.13, P = 0.017). The results were consistent with multiple sensitivity analyses. Threshold analysis suggested that the mortality risks of angiography-guided PCI were increased when the proportion of imaging-guided PCI exceeded approximately 50%.ConclusionsThe risks of the all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were higher for patients undergoing angiography-guided PCI in practices with a higher background imaging rate.

Optical coherence tomography-versus intravascular ultrasound-guided stent expansion in calcified lesions.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has a higher resolution than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and enables a more precise evaluation of calcium severity. We investigated the impact of the imaging method (OCT versus IVUS) on stent expansion during intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in calcified lesions. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, 145 lesions with moderate to severe calcification were divided into four groups: 40 IVUS-guided rotational atherectomy (RA), 38 IVUS-guided non-RA, 35 OCT-guided RA, and 32 OCT-guided non-RA. Lesions without pre-procedural intravascular imaging were excluded. OCT-guided RA was associated with greater stent expansion at the target calcium compared with IVUS-guided RA (median 88.0%, interquartile range [78.0-96.0] vs. 76.5% [71.0-84.3], P = 0.008). Furthermore, stent expansion in OCT-guided non-RA was similar to OCT-guided RA. OCT-guided RA used a larger burr compared to IVUS-guided RA (1.75mm [1.50-2.0] vs. 1.50mm [1.50-1.75], P = 0.004). In OCT-guided RA, the median minimum calcium thickness was significantly reduced from 800 (640-980) µm to 550 (350-680) µm (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ischemia driven target lesion revascularization between the four groups (P = 0.37). By determining the indication and endpoint of lesion modification by RA based on the thickness of calcium, OCT-guided PCI was associated with significantly greater stent expansion compared with IVUS-guided PCI.

Difference in basic concept of coronary bifurcation intervention between Korea and Japan. Insight from questionnaire in experts of Korean and Japanese bifurcation clubs

The coronary bifurcation intervention varies among countries due to the differences in assessment of lesion severity and treatment devices. We sought to clarify the difference in basic strategy between South Korea and Japan. A total of 19 and 32 experts from Korean (KBC) and Japanese Bifurcation Clubs (JBC), respectively, answered a survey questionnaire concerning their usual procedure of coronary bifurcation intervention. JBC experts performed less two-stent deployment in the left main (LM) bifurcation compared to KBC experts (JBC vs. KBC: median, 1–10% vs. 21–30%, p < 0.0001) instead of higher performance of side branch dilation after cross-over stenting in both LM (60% vs. 21%, p = 0.001) and non-LM bifurcations (30% vs. 5%, p = 0.037). KBC experts more frequently performed proximal optimization technique (POT) in non-LM bifurcation (41–60% vs. 81–99%, p = 0.028) and re-POT in both LM (1–20% vs. 81–99%, p = 0.017) and non-LM bifurcations (1–20% vs. 81–99%, p = 0.0003). JBC experts more frequently performed imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention, whereas KBC experts more often used a pressure wire to assess side branch ischemia. JBC experts used a rotablator more aggressively under the guidance of optical coherence tomography. We clarified the difference in the basic strategy of coronary bifurcation intervention between South Korea and Japan for better understanding the trend in each country.

Impact of intracoronary imaging on in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates following percutaneous coronary intervention: A nationwide readmissions database analysis.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is well established for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. This study was performed to assess the impact of in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission with intracoronary imaging as an adjunct to baseline coronary angiography. The study was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Readmission Database (NRD) of 2016, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patients who underwent PCI were identified using appropriate ICD-10 codes. Study population was further subcategorized into 2 PCI arms: intravascular imaging (''imaging'' group) and fluoroscopy guided (''angiography'' group). Primary endpoints were 30-day readmissions and in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of stay, cost of care, predictors of 30-day readmission and in-hospital mortality in PCI related hospitalizations. We identified in total 188,368 index admissions, with 12,379 patients in the "imaging-guided" group and 175,989 in the "angiography-alone" group. There were no differences in 30-day readmissions between both groups (~10.8% in both arms, p=.788). However, in-hospital mortality carried a statistically significant reduction with use of imaging-guided PCI (1.72% vs 2.24%, p=.004). The median length of stay was longer in the imaging-guided arm (3 vs. 2 days, p < .001), associated with larger median total hospital costs ($32,123 USD vs. $25,162 USD, p < .001). The strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality in both univariate and multivariate analysis was having an existing coagulopathy. The results of this study did not confer benefit with regards to 30-day hospital readmission rates when utilizing intracoronary imaging versus angiography-alone in percutaneous coronary intervention, but did suggest there may be an association between the use of intracoronary imaging and improved in-hospital mortality. In addition, resource utilization was higher in the intra-coronary imaging arm of the study.

Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Universal Approach for Optimization of Stent Implantation.

Despite consistent clinical data supporting the use of intravascular imaging with percutaneous coronary intervention, utilization remains low. A practical and standardized approach to incorporating intravascular imaging with percutaneous coronary intervention may overcome the barriers to utilization. This review focuses on basic image interpretation with intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography and proposes an algorithmic approach to stent sizing and optimization. Incorporation of this strategic method for percutaneous coronary intervention may aid in the greater adoption of intravascular imaging for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Intracoronary imaging reduces target vessel failure in primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Intracoronary imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) allows better delineation of lesion characteristics and more accurate vessel sizing compared with angiogram alone. However, the benefit and safety of its use in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is uncertain. Purpose To determine whether the use of intracoronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT)/ optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) in PPCI is associated with better outcome. Method From Jan 2014 to Dec 2018, all patients with PPCI performed in our hospital were retrospectively studied. Baseline and procedural characteristics of angiographic-guided versus imaging-guided PCI were analyzed. Primary endpoint was target vessel failure, and procedural outcomes were contrast volume, number of stents implanted, mean stent length and diameter and use of post-dilatation. Safety outcomes were post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and occurrence of no/slow reflow. Results A total of 408 patients were included, of which 223 (54.7%) used IVUS (n=176 80.3%) or OCT/OFDI (n=44 19.7%) during the procedure. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar between both groups except more patients had history of PCI (12.6% vs 4.3% p=0.004) and left-main/ bifurcation lesions (12.6% vs 2.7% p&amp;lt;0.001). Intra-coronary imaging was associated with less target vessel failure during a median follow up of 22 months (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.59; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.97; p=0.036). Patients who had intra-coronary imaging during PPCI received more post-dilatation (77.1% vs 55.1% p&amp;lt;0.001), had longer (53mm vs 42mm p&amp;lt;0.001) and more stents (2 vs 1.67 p=0.003) implanted but had more contrast injected (151.2ml vs 130.6ml p=0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in mean stent diameter (3.07mm vs 3.02mm p=0.53), occurrence of slow/now reflow (15.3% vs 18.4% p=0.409), incidence of AKI (7.2% vs 10.8% p=0.197) or need for RRT (3.1% vs 5.4% p=0.254) between both groups. Conclusion Use of intra-vascular imaging during PPCI was associated with less target vessel failure, longer and more stents implanted and more frequent use of post-dilatation. Further prospective randomized controlled trial is suggested to confirm this benefit. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has shown to improve outcomes in randomized controlled trials. However, there are little real-world data about intravascular imaging utilization during PCI and its outcomes in the United States. We conducted an observational analysis on the use of intravascular imaging (Intravascular Ultrasound or Optical Coherence Tomography)-guided PCI in 2,425,036 patients undergoing PCI between January 2010 and December 2014 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Utilizing propensity score matching, 83,988 matched pairs were identified. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included cardiogenic shock and acute kidney injury. Among the 2,425,036 patients, 161,808 (6.7%) underwent imaging-guided PCI. Use of imaging-guidance increased from 6% in 2010 to 6.6% in 2014 (Ptrend < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality was significantly different between imaging-guided PCI and angiography-guided PCI [1.0% vs. 1.5%; adjusted OR: 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-0.83, P < 0.001]. The rates of cardiogenic shock (2.5% vs. 3.1%; adjusted OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93; P = 0.005) were significantly lower in imaging-guided PCI group and acute kidney injury rates (7.0% vs. 7.1%; adjusted OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.89-1.12; P = 0.919) were not significantly different. Imaging-guided PCI is associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Yet, a small proportion of patients undergoing PCI have imaging-guidance.