Iliac Screws Research Articles

Lumbosacral Traumatic Spondylolisthesis L5 to S1-Classification and Surgical Management of a Difficult Presentation.

Lumbosacral traumatic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 is a rare clinical entity that compromises the stability of the L5 vertebra by displacing it anteriorly, laterally, or posteriorly on the S1 vertebral body secondary to osteotendinous and/or articular compromise of this segment due to trauma. This pathology is difficult to classify and manage; although surgical management remains the gold standard, short- and long-term results in the literature are scarce and highly variable. We present the case of a 53-year-old patient with lumbar trauma due to a free fall from a height of 6 meters. The fall resulted in cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbosacral traumatic spondylolisthesis L5-S1, which required immediate surgical management. For surgical management, we used a posterior approach for L5-S1 transpedicular screw fixation, spinal decompression, bilateral root foraminotomy of L5, and L5-S1 open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open reduction. After the operation, the patient reported immediate improvement of postoperative lower extremities pain and was discharged on the third postoperative day after achieving clinical improvement with physical therapy and bladder rehabilitation exercises. Lumbosacral traumatic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 is an unusual pathology that requires further study as there is currently no standardized classification. Surgical management is the gold standard and includes open reduction with short transpedicular screw fixation in segment L5-S1 and other surgical interventions such as extension to the pelvis with iliac screws, screws to the L4 vertebral body, and use of lumbar interbody fusion cages.

A retrospective CT based comparative analysis of available screw pathways to determine optimal iliac screw trajectory

<b>Introduction:</b> The lumbo-sacral stabilization using iliac screw is gaining popularity in such cases of long multi segment lumbar constructs. Iliac screws help to achieve strong spinopelvic fixation, augments and protects sacral screws. However, there is a great variability found in literature for iliac screw fixation in terms of trajectory, screw length and screw diameter. Also, to the best of our knowledge, there is lacunae in current literature regarding the optimal pathway, screw length and screw diameter in the Indian population. Hence, we planned the study with the aim to analyze the available screw pathways to determine optimal iliac screw trajectory, screw length and diameter for the Indian population.<br /> <b>Material and methods:</b> This was a tertiary center-based retrospective study. One hundred pelvic CT scans of patients in 18-70 years age, who underwent abdominal CT on Siemens 256-slice dual source CT scanner for various indications were evaluated. Subsequently, 4 iliac screw trajectories were assessed by connecting the points given below using double oblique reformats on which the lengths and narrowest zones of these trajectories were measured. Path A: Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS) to Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (AIIS); Path B: point between PSIS and posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS) to Anterior Inferior iliac spine  (AIIS); Path C: iliac crest intersection point (CLIC) point to Upper acetabulum; Path D: CLIC point to acetabular center.<br /> [p1] <b>[a2] Results:</b> Statistically significant difference was found in the lengths of various pathways. Path A (PSIS to AIIS) was found to be the longest (mean 13 cm). The second longest path in our study was path C (CLIC point to Upper acetabulum). The narrowest widths of each path were not found to have any statistically significant difference.<br /> <b>Conclusion:</b> Iliac screw fixation is of paramount importance for lumbosacral stabilization. Of the studied paths, trajectory from posterior-superior iliac spine to Antero-inferior iliac spine has the longest passage length and is the most optimal path for the Indian population. In case additional screws are required, the trajectory from CLIC point to Upper acetabulum provides the second largest screw passage.

A radiological analysis of pelvic fixation trajectories: patient series.

Three well-defined methods for pelvic fixation are used for biomechanical support in spine fusion constructs: iliac, recessed iliac, and S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws. The authors compared the maximum screw sizes that could be placed with these techniques by using image-guidance software and high-resolution computed tomography scans from 20 randomly selected patients. Six trajectories were plotted per side, beginning at recognized starting points (standard or recessed posterior superior iliac spine [PSIS] or S2AI screw) and ending at the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) or supra-acetabular notch (SAN). The mean maximum screw length and width ranged from 80.0 ± 32.2 mm to 140.8 ± 22.6 mm and from 8.25 ± 1.2 mm to 13.0 ± 2.7 mm, respectively, depending on the trajectory. Statistically significant differences in length were found between the standard and recessed PSIS trajectories to the AIIS (p < 0.001) and between the standard PSIS-to-AIIS trajectory and the S2AI-to-AIIS (p = 0.007) or S2AI-to-SAN (p < 0.001) trajectories. The most successful trajectory was the PSIS to SAN (95%, 38/40). The traditional iliac screw trajectory enabled the longest and widest screw trajectories and highest rate of successful screw placement with the fewest theoretical breaches more reliably than recessed and S2AI trajectories. These findings may help surgeons plan for maximum screw purchase for pelvic fixation.

Posterior Spinal Screw Fixation Techniques and Trajectories: General Overview and an Analysis of How Often They Are Used

Abstract Background: There is a great variety of techniques (translaminar, transfacet, and extrapedicular screws) apart from the traditional pedicle screw in posterior spinal instrumentation. The latter technique is the most widely used around the world (except from the cervical region) since it tends to obtain very good results with a simple approach with fewer complications.Therefore, other trajectories are usually reserved for more specific cases in which the insertion of these purely pedicle screws is not possible. Objective: The objective of this study was to review and analyze the use of different techniques and trajectories of posterior spinal instrumentation by different spinal surgeons around the world. Material and Methods: We developed a survey including posterior spinal screw techniques and trajectories. In this article, we present the data resulting from 122 answers from different spinal surgeons (neuro, orthopedic surgery). Results: Despite advances in the development of new technologies such as neuronavigation (17%) and robotic (1%) available on the market, nowadays, the gold-standard technique for spinal screw insertion is the fluoroscopy-assisted freehand approach (54%). The lumbar spine is the most instrumented spinal region (31%), with a clear preference for purely transpedicular screws. Thoracic and sacroiliac areas presented a greater diversity of screw trajectories. In the cervical spine, there is a clear tendency toward the insertion of lateral mass screws (85% in the atlantoaxial region and 70% in the subaxial region), as opposed to the use of pedicular screws. This is mainly due to the complexity of this area and the risk of damaging important neurovascular structures relatively close to the pedicles. Unexpectedly, two additional techniques were presented: cortical bone trajectory for lumbar screw fixation (for osteoporotic patients) and S2-alar-iliac screw fixation (more used than iliac screws alone). Conclusions: This survey demonstrates that the most used spinal trajectory in the thoracolumbar spinal region is the traditional pedicle screw insertion. Lateral mass was the most common place to insert screws in the subaxial cervical region. The use of robotic systems can improve the position of the screws of more complex techniques. We consider that the different techniques should be known since every surgery will be adapted to the patient’s anatomy and needs.

Use of supplemental rod constructs in adult spinal deformity surgery

Operative treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD) commonly involves long posterior instrumented fusions with primary rods spanning from the base of the construct to the upper instrumented vertebra. Over the past decade, additional supplemental rods have been increasingly utilized to bolster the primary instrumentation and mitigate risk of primary rod fracture/pseudarthrosis at areas of high biomechanical stress (e.g., 3-column osteotomy [3CO], multiple posterior column osteotomies [PCOs], lumbosacral junction). Supplemental rods for 3CO include satellite rods (4-rod technique with 2 deeply recessed short rods independently attached to pedicle screws across the 3CO), accessory rods (attached to primary rods via side-to-side connectors), and delta rods (accessory rods contoured only at the proximal and distal attachments to primary rods). Utilizing more than 4 rods across a 3CO may increase posterior construct stability; however, diminished load transfer to the anterior vertebral column may increase risk of nonunion and instrumentation failure. Similar supplemental rod constructs can be utilized to support multiple PCOs and/or the lumbosacral junction. We generally recommend using bilateral accessory rods for a total of 4 rods to support the lumbosacral junction (2 accessory rods and 2 primary rods). The novel “kickstand rod” can help facilitate coronal correction and/or function as an accessory rod distally anchored to an independent iliac screw; appropriate nomenclature is “iliac accessory rod” in cases without true kickstand distraction. In this narrative review, we aim to (1) provide a brief historical overview of supplemental rod constructs, (2) describe current indications for supplemental rods, and (3) report our results from a longitudinal analysis (2008–2020) of supplemental rod constructs used by International Spine Study Group (ISSG) surgeons.

How Does Spino-Pelvic Fixation Affect Post-Operative Compensatory Mechanisms in Adult Spinal Deformity?

Retrospective single-center multi-surgeon cohort study. Compare the post-operative changes in the compensatory mechanisms of the sagittal balance according to the type of pelvic fixation: S2-Alar-iliac screws (S2AI) vs iliac screws (IS) in patients with Adult spine deformity (ASD). ASD patients who underwent spino-pelvic fixation and remained with a PI-LL >10° mismatch post-operatively were included. Pre-operative and 1-year-follow-up PI, Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), thoracic kyphosis (TK), femur obliquity angle (FOA), knee flexion angle (KFA) and ankle flexion angle (AFA) were analyzed on EOS imaging. Patients were categorized based on their pelvic fixation type (S2AI vs IS), and the pre-operative to 1-year-post-operative changes (ΔX°) in the compensatory mechanisms were compared between groups. Patients with S2AI (n = 53) and those with IS (n = 26) screws were comparable at baseline. ΔSS averaged 9.87° in the S2AI compared to 13.2° in the IS (P = .001), whereas the ΔKFA reached 6.01° in the S2AI as opposed to 3.06° in the IS (P = .02). The ΔPT was comparable between both groups (6.35°[S2AI group] vs 5.21°[ISgroup], P = .42). ΔTK, ΔLL, ΔFOA and ΔAFA were comparable between both groups. The type of pelvic fixation impacts significantly the post-operative compensatory mechanisms in patients with ASD. Patients with S2AI screws are more likely to compensate their remaining post-operative PI-LL mismatch through their knees and less likely through their pelvis compared to patients with IS, despite similar changes in PT. This could be explained by an increased SI joint laxity in ASD patient and the lower resistance of the iliac connectors to the junctional mechanical stresses, allowing for sacro-iliac joint motion in patients with IS.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Managing Grade IV and V Spondylolisthesis.

Surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis is controversial and aims at restoring the spinopelvic sagittal balance through complete or partial reduction of the listhesis. Nerve decompression and interbody fusion are necessary for patients presenting with neurological deficit, severe pain, lower limb asymmetry, or deformities. We present the case and the results of a patient with high-grade spondylolisthesis, in whom minimally invasive management was performed. A narrative review in this topic is also provided. We performed a literature review of high-grade spondylolisthesis to compare our technique to current surgical alternatives. We included articles from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, and Science Direct published between 1963 and 2022 that were written in English, German, and Spanish. The terms used were the following: "high grade spondylolisthesis," "spondyloptosis," "surgical management," "interbody fusion," and "arthrodesis." In all, 485 articles were displayed, from which we filtered 112 by title and abstract. At the end, 75 references were selected for the review. Different interbody fusion techniques can be used to correct the lumbosacral kyphosis and restore the spinopelvic parameters. A complete reduction of the listhesis is not always required. The surgical procedure carried out in our patient corresponds to the first known case of minimally invasive circumferential arthrodesis with iliac screws and sacral fixation in a high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis. This approach guarantees the correction of the lumbosacral kyphosis and a complete reduction of the listhesis. Further studies are required to determine whether the results of this case can be extrapolated to other patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Mechanical upside of PAO mainstream fixations: co-simulation based on early postoperative gait characteristics of DDH patients.

Purpose: To investigate the early postoperative gait characteristics of patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and predict the biomechanical performance of two commonly used PAO fixation methods: iliac screw (IS) and transverse screw (TS). Methods: A total of 12 patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) (mean age 27.81 ± 4.64years, 42% male) that were scheduled to undergo PAO surgery were included in this study. Their preoperative CT images and pre- and postoperative gait data were used to create subject-specific musculoskeletal models and complete the inverse dynamics analysis (IDA). Two patients with typical gait characteristics were selected using clustering analysis, and their IDA data were incorporated into finite element (FE) models of IS and TS fixations. Failure simulation was performed by applying iterative steps with increasing gait load to predict yield load. Stress results and yield loads were calculated for each FE model at different phases of the gait cycle. Results: Postoperative gait showed improvement compared to preoperative gait but remained inferior to that of healthy individuals. Postoperative gait was characterized by a lower hip range of motion, lower peri-ilium muscle forces, particularly in the abductors, and a sharper initial peak and flatter second peak of hip joint reaction force (HRF). Finite element analysis (FEA) showed a trend of increasing stress during the second-fourth phases of the gait cycle, with lower stress levels in other phases. At high-stress gait phases, the mean stress of maximum differed significantly between IS and TS (p < 0.05) and between coupled and uncoupled muscle forces (p < 0.05). Failure analysis predicted a slightly larger yield load for TS configurations (6.21*BW) than that for IS (6.16*BW), but both were well above the gait load. Coupled and uncoupled groups showed similar results, but uncoupled groups had lower yield loads (5.9*BW). Conclusion: PAO early postoperative gait shows a normalized trend, but abnormalities persist. IS and TS are both capable of resisting mechanical strain failure, with no significant mechanical advantage found for transverse screw fixation during PAO early postoperative gait. Additionally, it is important to note that the TS may have a higher risk of cyclic fatigue failure due to the localized greater stress concentration. Furthermore, the most medial screw is crucial for pelvic stability.

Anatomic trajectory for iliac screw placement adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual than the S2 alar iliac screw: a radiological study

PurposeThe iliac fixation (IF) through the S2 ala permits the minimization of implant prominence and tissue dissection. An alternative to this technique is the anatomic iliac screw fixation (AI), which considers the perpendicular axis to the narrowest width of the ileum and the width of the screw. The morphological accuracy of the iliac screw insertion of two low profile iliac fixation (IF) techniques is investigated in this study.MethodsTwenty-nine patients operated on via low profile IF technique were divided into two groups, those treated using 28 screws with the starting point at S2, and those treated with 30 AI entry point. Radiological parameters (Tsv-angle, Sag-Angle, Max-length, sacral-distance, iliac-width, S2-midline, skin-distance, iliac-wing, and PSIS distance) and clinical outcomes (early and clinic complications) were evaluated by two blinded expert radiologists, and the results were compared in both groups with the real trajectory of the screws placed.ResultsDifferences between ideal and real trajectories were observed in 6 of the 9 evaluated parameters in the S2AI group. In the AI group, these trajectories were similar, except for TSV-Angle, Max-length, Iliac-width, and distance to iliac-wing parameters. Moreover, compared with S2AI, AI provided better adaptation to the pelvic morphology in all parameters, except for sagittal plane angulation, skin distance, and iliac width.ConclusionsAI ensures the advantages of low profile pelvic fixation like S2AI, with a starting point in line with S1 pedicle anchors and low implant prominence, and moreover adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual.

Modification to the placement of the navigation reference frame in posterior corrective fusion of spinal deformity with myelomeningocele: a series of 6 cases.

To show a modified placement of the navigation reference frame in posterior corrective fusion of spinal deformity with myelomeningocele. This was a retrospective, single-surgeon case series, and IRB-approved study. Six consecutive patients (one male and five females) who were diagnosed with spinal deformity with myelomeningocele underwent posterior corrective fusion surgery from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis with preoperative computed tomography navigation (pCTN). At the level of the spina bifida, where posterior elements such as the spinous process were missing, the reference frame of the pCTN was placed on the flipped lamina or pedicles, and a pedicle screw (PS) or iliac screw (IS) was inserted. Screw deviation was investigated by using postoperative CT. A total of 55 screws were placed at the spina bifida level and pelvis. Of these, 12 ISs were placed on each side in each case. The screws placed using the pCTN were not reinserted or removed intraoperatively or postoperatively. However, only one PS was found to have perforated the spinal canal on postoperative CT but was left in place because it caused no neurological problem. By modifying the placement of the reference frame, such as placing it on the flipped lamina or pedicles, pCTN could be used even at the levels of the spina bifida, where the posterior elements are missing, to accurately place PSs and various types of ISs.

Bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion in long constructs using self-harvesting porous S2-alar iliac screws with an integrated tulip: technical considerations and early clinical and radiographic experience.

The incidence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction after lumbosacral fusion is high. Upfront bilateral SIJ fusion using novel fenestrated self-harvesting porous S2-alar iliac (S2AI) screws could reduce the incidence of SIJ dysfunction and need for subsequent SIJ fusion. In this study, the authors report their early clinical and radiographic results of SIJ fusion using this novel screw. The authors began using self-harvesting porous screws in July 2022. This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients at a single institution who underwent long thoracolumbar surgery with extension to the pelvis using this porous screw. Radiographic parameters of regional and global alignment were collected preoperatively and at the time of last follow-up. The incidence of intraoperative complications and need for revision were collected. The incidences of mechanical complications, including screw breakage, implant loosening/pullout, and screw cap dislocation at the time of last follow-up were also collected. Ten patients with a mean age of 67 years were included, 6 of whom were male. Seven patients had a thoracolumbar construct with extension to the pelvis. Three patients had upper instrumented vertebrae at the proximal lumbar spine. Intraoperative breach was not encountered in any of the patients (0%). Postoperatively, 1 patient (10%) had screw breakage at the neck of the tulip of the modified iliac screw discovered at routine follow-up without clinical sequalae. Use of self-harvesting porous S2AI screws incorporated into long thoracolumbar constructs was safe and feasible, demanding unique technical considerations. Long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up with a large patient cohort is necessary to determine their durability and efficacy to achieve SIJ arthrodesis and prevent SIJ dysfunction.

Safety of robotic-assisted screw placement for spine surgery: Experience from the initial 125 cases

BackgroundThe present study aimed to evaluate the safety of robot-assisted screw placement in 125 cases after introducing a spinal robotics system and to identify the situations where deviation was likely to occur. MethodsThe subjects were 125 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted screw placement using a spinal robotics system (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic) from April 2021 to January 2023. The 1048 screws placed with robotic assistance were evaluated. We investigated intraoperative adverse events of the robotics system and complications occurring within 30 days after surgery. We evaluated screw accuracy and deviation and compared them for vertebral levels, screw insertion methods (open traditional pedicle screw [Open-PS], cortical bone trajectory screw [CBT], percutaneous pedicle screw [PPS], and S2 alar iliac screw [S2AIS]), diagnosis, and phases of surgical cases. ResultsThe deviation rate of robotic-assisted screw placement for spine surgery was 2.2%. Complications were reoperation due to implant-related neurological deficit in 0.8% and surgical site infection in 0.8%. There was significant difference in the deviation rate between vertebral levels. The deviation rate of the T1–T4 level was high at 10.0%. There was significant difference in the deviation rate between Open-PS, CBT, PPS, and S2AIS. The PPSs had a high deviation rate of 10.3%. The deviation rates were not significantly different between patients with and without deformity. The deviation rate did not change depending on the experience of surgical cases, and the deviation rate was favorable from the onset. ConclusionAlthough the robotic-assisted screw placement was safe, we should be extra vigilant when placing screws in the upper thoracic region (deviation rate 10.0%) and when using PPSs (deviation rate 10.3%).

Clinical and radiological efficacy of spino-pelvic fixation in the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis

Pelvic fixation is performed to obtain proper coronal and sagittal alignment when the pelvic obliquity is more than 15º in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Since many NMS patients were wheelchair or bed-ridden status, there has been controversy on the effect of pelvic fixation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of pelvic fixation on correction of spinal deformity and quality of life (QoL) in NMS patients. A total of 77 NMS patients who underwent deformity correction were divided into three groups and retrospectively analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 2-year follow-up: pelvic fixation group (Group A, n = 16), fixed to S1 (Group B, n = 33), and fixed to L5 (Group C, n = 28). The correction rate of scoliosis was 60.0%, 58.0%, and 56.7% in groups A, B, and C, respectively, with no statistical difference (P > 0.05). The correction rate of pelvic obliquity was 61.3%, 42.8%, and 57.5% in respective groups A, B, and C, with no significance (P > 0.05). The correction loss of scoliosis and pelvic obliquity showed no statistical significance between three groups for 2-year follow-up (all Ps > 0.05). There were no significant differences regarding clinical outcomes and postoperative complications among the three groups (all Ps > 0.05). Therefore, pelvic fixation using iliac screws is not substantially influencing radiological and clinical outcomes in the patients with NMS.

Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Traumatic Sacral Fractures: Case Series Investigating Early Safety and Efficacy

High-energy traumatic sacral fractures, particularly U-type or AOSpine classification type C fractures, may lead to significant functional deficits. Traditionally, spinopelvic fixation for unstable sacral fractures was performed with open reduction and fixation, but robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgical methods now present new, less invasive approaches. The objective here was to present a series of patients with traumatic sacral fractures treated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation and discuss early experience, considerations, and technical challenges. Between June 2022 and January 2023, 7 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. Intraoperative fluoroscopic images were merged with intraoperative computed tomography images using a robotic system to plan the trajectories for placement of bilateral lumbar pedicle and iliac screws. Intraoperative computed tomography was performed after pedicle and pelvic screw insertion to confirm appropriate placement before insertion of rods percutaneously without the need for a side connector. The cohort consisted of 7 patients (4 female, 3 male) with ages ranging from 20 to 74. Intraoperatively, the mean blood loss was 85.7 ± 84.0 mL, and mean operative time was 178.4 ± 63.9 minutes. There were no complications in 6 patients; 1 patient experienced both a medially breached pelvic screw and a complicated rod pullout. All patients were safely discharged to their homes or an acute rehabilitation facility. Our early experience reveals that robotic-assisted minimally invasive spinopelvic fixation for traumatic sacral fractures is a safe and feasible treatment option with the potential to improve outcomes and reduce complications.

Modified unilateral iliac screw fixation with partial reduction in the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis at L5/S1 in adult patients: introduction of key technique, report of clinical outcomes and analysis of spinopelvic parameters

BackgroundManagement of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains challenging. Spinopelvic fixation such as iliac screw (IS) was developed to deal with HGS. However concerns regarding constructs prominence and increased infection-related revision surgery have complicated it’s use. We aim to introduce the modified iliac screw (IS) technique in treating high-grade L5/S1 spondylolisthesis and it’s clinical and radiological outcomes.MethodsPatients with L5/S1 HGS who underwent modified IS fixation were enrolled. Pre- and postsurgical upright full spine radiographs were obtained to analyze sagittal imbalance, spinopelvic parameters, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), slip percentage, slip angle (SA), and lumbosacral angle (LSA). Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively for clinical outcomes assessment. Estimated blood loss, operating time, perioperative complications and revision surgery were documented.ResultsFrom Jan 2018 to March 2020, 32 patients (15 males) with mean age of 58.66 ± 7.77 years were included. The mean follow-up period was 49 months. The mean operation duration was 171.67 ± 36.66 min. At the last follow-up: (1) the VAS and ODI score were significantly improved (p < 0.05), (2) PI increased by an average of 4.3°, the slip percent, SA and LSA were significantly improved (p < 0.05), (3) four patients (16.7%) with global sagittal imbalance recovered a good sagittal alignment, PI-LL within ± 10° was observed in all patients. One patient experienced wound infection. One patient underwent a revision surgery due to pseudoarthrosis at L5/S1.ConclusionThe modified IS technique is safe and effective in treating L5/S1 HGS. Sparing use of offset connector could reduce hardware prominence, leading to lower wound infection rate and less revision surgery. The long-term clinical affection of increased PI value is unknown.

Software-assisted preoperative planning of S1 Alar Iliac screws: a 3D morphometric and anatomical study.

S1 alar iliac (S1AI) trajectory has gained popularity as a salvage technique for revision surgeries and failed constructs in the lumbopelvic region. This study aims to investigate the morphometry of this new trajectory based on 3D models. The possible role of gender, ethnicity and view angle (surgeon's vs. radiologist's) was investigated. Computed tomography-driven virtual 3D models of spinopelvic region were created applying Materialize MIMICS software, and assessed for coronal and sagittal radiographic versus surgeon's view angles, and morphometry of the screw trajectory. Independent-samples t test was used to analyze the results. P value was set at < = 0.05. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software (SPSS version 24.0) was used for the statistical analysis. A total of 164 3D models were simulated with a total 328 screws inserted satisfactorily within the S1AI trajectory. S1AI instrumentation was feasible in 96.48%. The mean radiological coronal angle was 50.619' ± 8.590' and the mean coronal angle for surgeons' perspective was 10.263' ± 5.860'. The mean radiological and surgeon's perspective sagittal angles were found to be 44.532' ± 6.424' and 31.164' ± 5.455', respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between anatomical and surgeon's perspective trajectories. Neither the pelvic laterality nor the gender influence the screw angles, length and diameter in radiological versus surgeon's view angles. Preoperative 3D modeling would be an invaluable adjunct to increase the accuracy of S1AI screw placement. Surgeon's perspective of the trajectory differs from standard CT sections and should be considered in preoperative planning.

Direct Iliac Screw vs Sacral-2-Alar-Iliac Screws Technique for Sacropelvic Fixation: Technical Nuances and a Review of the Literature.

Sacropelvic (SP) fixation is the immobilization of the sacroiliac joint to attain lumbosacral fusion and prevent distal spinal junctional failure. SP fixation is indicated in numerous spinal conditions (eg, scoliosis, multilevel spondylolisthesis, spinal/sacral trauma, tumors, or infections). Many SP fixation techniques have been described in the literature. Currently, the most used surgical techniques for SP fixation are direct iliac screws and sacral-2-alar-iliac screws. There is currently no consensus in the literature on which technique carries more favorable clinical outcomes. In this review, we aim to assess the available data on each technique and discuss their respective advantages and disadvantages. We will also present our experience with a modification of direct iliac screws using a subcrestal approach and outline the future prospects of SP fixation.

490 Beyond Placement of Pedicle Screws - New Applications for Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Multi-Surgeon, Single-Institution Experience

INTRODUCTION: Interest in robotic-assisted spine surgery has grown as surgeon comfort and technology have evolved to maximize the benefits of time-saving and precision. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has currently only approved robotics to assist in determining the ideal trajectory for pedicle screw placement after extensive research supporting its efficacy and efficiency. To be considered a durable and effective option, robotics need to expand beyond the indication of just placing pedicle screws. METHODS: We will explore accessing Kambin’s Triangle in percutaneous transforaminal interbody fusion (percLIF), iliac fixation in metastatic cancer, and sacroiliac (SI) fusions. Each of these topics will be covered in-depth with associated background information and subsequent discussion. RESULTS: Without the need for laminectomies or facetectomies, minimal tissue disruption was attained by using RA instrumentation finely tuned to each patient’s unique spinal landscape for percLIF. In the cases of iliac fixation, the use of S2AI screws was precluded by the extensive damage to the sacrum. Therefore, a modified iliac screw entry point was utilized with an entry point slightly more medial than the traditional method, with a pre-planned trajectory of the screws using robot assistance. For SI joint fusion, we review our group at Duke University's published case series displaying the “off-label” use of the robot, which is the first reported case series of its kind in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: We show that with a proper understanding of its limitations, robots can help surgeons perform difficult surgeries in a safe manner.

Can Pelvic Incidence Change After Lumbo-Pelvic Fixation for Adult Spine Deformity and Would the Change Be Affected By the Type of Pelvic Fixation?

Retrospective review. To assess the change in pelvic incidence (PI) after lumbo-pelvic fixation and the differential impact of the type of pelvic fixation: S2-alar-iliac screws(S2AI) versus Iliac screws(IS) on post-operative PI. Recent studies suggest that changes occur to the previously assumed fixed PI after spino-pelvic fixation. Adult spine deformity(ASD) patients who underwent spino-pelvic fixation with≥4 levels fusion were included. Pre-operative and post-operative PI, lumbar lordosis(LL), thoracic kyphosis(TK), pelvic tilt(PT), sacral slope(SS), PI-LL mismatch and the Sagittal Vertical Axis(SVA) were analyzed on EOS imaging. A significant PI change was established at≥6⁰. Patients were categorized based on the type of pelvic fixation (S2AI vs. IS). One-hundred-forty-nine patients were included. Of these, 77(52%) had a>6⁰ change in their PI post-operatively. In patients with high pre-operative PI (>60⁰), 62% had a significant PI change compared to 33% of patients with normal PI (40⁰-60⁰) and 53% in patients with low PI(<40⁰; P=0.01). PI was likely to decrease in patients with high baseline PI (>60⁰) and to increase in patients with low baseline PI (<40⁰). Patients with a significant PI change had a higher PI-LL. Patients in the S2AI group (n=99) and those in the IS group (n=50) were comparable at baseline. In the S2AI group, 50 (51%) patients had>6⁰ change in their PI compared to 27(54%) patients in the IS group(P=0.65). In both groups, patients with high pre-operative PI were more prone to significant post-operative changes (P=0.02 in IS, P=0.01 in S2AI). PI changed significantly in 50% of patients post-operatively, especially in those with high/low pre-operative PI and those with severe baseline sagittal imbalance. This occurs similarly in patients with S2AI and those with IS screws. Surgeons should keep in mind these anticipated changes while planning ideal LL, as this impacts post-operative PI-LL mismatch. IV.

Pelvic ring reconstruction with tibial allograft, screws and rods following enneking type I and IV resection of primary bone tumors

IntroductionSurgery of primary malignant tumors involving the sacroiliac joint requires wide resection, which often interrupts the pelvic ring. Nowadays, restoration of the pelvic ring to provide stability and which technique is most fitting remain subject to debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of pelvic reconstruction with pedicle screw instrumentation and tibial allograft following Enneking Type I-IV resections. Patients and methodsAll patients who underwent reconstruction with tibial allograft, screws and rods after resection of areas I and IV for primary bone tumors between 2017 and 2022 were reviewed. Clinical and radiological characteristics, fusion rate and functional results were analyzed. The MSTS score and the TESS were used to evaluate functional results. ResultsSeven patients were included in the study. Chondrosarcoma was the most common histology. Only four patients reported pain. No fractures were observed at tumor diagnosis. Computer-assisted navigation was used in six cases. Reconstruction was performed in four cases with a screw inserted in the homolateral L5 pedicle and in the ischium, in two cases with a screw in the homolateral L4 pedicle and another in the homolateral L5 pedicle, in the last case with two screws inserted in L4 and L5, one screw in the ischium and another one in the residual iliac wing. In this case a contralateral stabilization was also carried out. The spine screws and the iliac screws were connected with a rod. The mean follow-up for all 7 patients was 37 months. One patient (16.6%) died due to general complications not directly related to the surgery; while the others are alive and apparently free of disease. Complete fusion was obtained in four out of seven patients and the average time for fusion was 9 months. The average MSTS score and TESS were 58.7% and 57.8%, respectively. DiscussionThe need for reconstruction is thoroughly debated in literature. The advantages of restoring posterior pelvis stability are the prevention of long-term pain associated with limb shortening and secondary scoliosis. Re-establishment of the pelvic ring can be achieved through synthetic, biologic or hybrid reconstructions. ConclusionsMore studies that assess the surgical consequences at long-term follow-up and help clarify the indications for reconstruction and the specific technique are necessary to confirm our preliminary results.