Iliac Screws Research Articles

Effects of pelvic fixation strategies and multi-rod constructs on biomechanics of the proximal junction in long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions: a finite-element analysis.

To assess the effect of various pelvic fixation techniques and number of rods on biomechanics of the proximal junction of long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions. A validated spinopelvic finite-element (FE) model was instrumented with L5-S1 ALIF and one of the following 9 posterior instrumentation configurations: (A) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally ("2 Iliac/2 Rods"); (B) T10 to S1 ("Sacral Only"); (C) unilateral traditional iliac screw ("1 Iliac/2 Rods"); (D) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally with one midline accessory rod ("2 Iliac/3 rods"); (E) S2AI screws connected directly to the midline rods ("2 S2AI/2 Rods"); and two traditional iliac screws bilaterally with two lateral accessory rods connected to the main rods at varying locations (F1: T10-11, F2: T11-12, F3: T12-L1, F4: L1-2) ("4 Iliac/4 Rods"). Range of motions (ROM) at T10-S1 and T9-T10 were recorded and compared between models. The T9-T10 intradiscal pressures and stresses of the T9-10 disc's annulus in addition to the von Mises stresses of the T9 and T10 vertebral bodies were recorded and compared. For T10-S1 ROM, 4 iliac/4 rods had lowest ROM in flexion and extension, while 2 S2AI/2 rods showed lowest ROM in rotation. Constructs with 3 or 4 rods had lower stresses on the primary rods compared to 2-rod constructs. At the proximal adjacent disc (T9-10), 4 iliac/4 rods showed lowest ROM, lowest intradiscal pressures, and lowest annular stress in all directions (most pronounced in flexion-extension). Under flexion and extension, 4 iliac/4 rods also showed the lowest von Mises stresses on the T10 vertebral body but the highest stresses on the T9 vertebral body. Dual iliac screws with 4 rods across the lumbosacral junction and extending to the thoracolumbar junction demonstrated the lowest T10-S1 ROM, the lowest adjacent segment disc (T9-T10) ROM, intradiscal pressures, and annular stresses, and the lowest UIV stresses, albeit with the highest UIV + 1 stresses. Additional studies are needed to confirm whether these biomechanical findings dictate clinical outcomes and effect rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure.

Lumbopelvic Stabilization with Two Methods of Triangular Osteosynthesis: A Biomechanical Study.

(1) Background: Pelvic fractures, and particularly instabilities of the dorsal pelvic ring, are becoming increasingly prevalent, particularly in orthogeriatric patients. Spino-pelvic triangular osteosynthesis is an effective approach to achieve sufficient stabilization in vertically unstable fractures. This study compares two types of osteosynthesis: the conventional one and a novel instrumentation where the iliosacral screw is placed through a fenestrated iliac screw. (2) Methods: Sixteen artificial osteoporotic L5+pelvis models with an unstable sacral fracture have been instrumented with either an iliac screw connected with a rod to a L5 pedicle screw and an iliosacral screw (TF) or a fenestrated ilium screw connected with a rod to a L5 pedicle screw and an iliosacral screw passing through the fenestra of the iliac screw (TFS). Biomechanical testing was performed using cyclic loading until failure. (3) Results: Both configurations yielded comparable results with regard to initial stiffness, implant loosening, and cycles to failure. The TFS exhibited markedly higher values for cycles to failure and markedly lower values for loosening. However, due to the characteristics of the artificial bone model, these findings were not significant. (4) Conclusions: The novel triangular fixation systems demonstrated comparable results to the standard triangular osteosynthesis configuration.

Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation is effective in the management of unstable transverse sacral fractures

ObjectivesHistorically, fractures causing lumbopelvic dissociation have been managed with open lumbosacral fusion and instrumentation. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes and complications following surgical management of unstable transverse sacral fractures with percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation. MethodsDesign: Retrospective case series. Setting: Academic Single Center, Level I Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with lumbopelvic dissociation undergoing surgery. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, ISS, associated injuries, radiographic classification (Roy-Camille), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS PI, PF, D, and ODI), and complications were collected. Results27 patients were enrolled with an average follow-up of 18.7 ± 17.6 months and age of 54.4 ± 25.1 years. All patients underwent lumbar pedicle screw and iliac screw placement. Sacral laminectomy was performed if the patient had a preoperative neurological deficit. Patients were counseled on instrumentation removal at 6–12 months. 67 % of patients sustained a fall, and 33 % were involved in an MVA. 52 % were Roy-Camille Type 2, and 32 % and 20 % were Types 1 and 3, respectively. The mean EBL was 261 ± 400 ml. 37 % required concurrent sacral laminectomy. There were no intraoperative complications and four postoperative complications, including surgical site infection, rod dislodgment, and deep venous thrombosis. 63 % underwent removal of instrumentation after fracture healing. ODI scores significantly improved from 6 weeks post-op (35.5 ± 4.5) to one-year follow-up (18.3 ± 9.6, p = 0.005), two-year follow-up (20.3 ± 10.0, p = 0.03), and final follow-up (16.4 ± 8.8, p = 0.002). Statistically significant improvements were observed in the PROMIS PI, PF, and D domains (p < 0.05). ConclusionOur study demonstrates that lumbopelvic instrumentation leads to successful management of unstable transverse sacral fractures, with improvement in PRO. The combination of percutaneous instrumentation without arthrodesis did not result in any fracture non-union. Level of evidenceLevel IV

Triangular spinopelvic fixation for U-shaped sacral fractures and tile C pelvic disruptions: counter-nutation (anteflexion and rotation) load-bearing instability requires complementary anterior pelvic ring fixation.

Unstable trauma lesion of the spinopelvic junction, including U-shaped sacral fractures and Tile C pelvic ring disruptions, require surgical stabilization in order to realign the bone arches of the pelvis thus reducing the upcoming orthopaedic impairment during sitting, standing, and walking positions, decompress the nerves roots of the cauda equina in a view of reducing neurological impairment, and allow early weight bearing. Even though posterior open modified triangular spinopelvic fixation is particularly efficient for treating unstable trauma lesions of the spinopelvic junction, it may not be sufficient alone in order to prevent long-term counter-nutation, i.e. rotation and anteflexion deformity of the anterior pelvis under load bearing conditions. Such progressive deformation is caused by either the slight rotation of the iliac connectors within the head of iliac screws for spinopelvic constructs, or the slight rotation of sacral cancellous bone around transsacral screws in case of percutaneous procedure. Regardless of the posterior surgical technique that is used, complementary anterior pelvic fixation appears mandatory in order to prevent such deformation over time, which can lead to pelvic asymmetry and then gait imbalance.

Fluoroscopy guided teardrop technique for open trans-muscular iliac screw placement and open reduction maneuvers during modified triangular spinopelvic fixation for unstable U-shaped sacral and tile C pelvic traumas: technical note.

Unstable traumas of the spinopelvic junction, which include displaced U-shaped sacral fractures (Roy-Camille type 2 and type 3) and Tile C vertical shear pelvic ring disruptions, occur in severe traumas patients following high speed traffic accident or fall from a height. These unstable traumas of the spinopelvic junction jeopardize one's ability to stand and to walk by disrupting the biomechanical arches of the pelvis, and may also cause cauda equina syndrome. Historically, such patients were treated with bed rest and could suffer a life-long burden of orthopedic and neurological disability. Since Schildhauer pioneer work back in 2003, triangular spinopelvic fixation, whether it is performed in a percutaneous fashion or by open reduction and internal fixation, allows to realign bone fragments of the spinopelvic junction and to resume walking within three weeks. Nevertheless, such procedure remains highly technical and it not encountered very often, even for spine surgeons working in high-volume level 1 trauma centers. Hence, this visual technical note aims to provide a few tips to guide less experience surgeons to complete this procedure safely.

3D CT modeling demonstrates the anatomic feasibility of S1AI screw trajectory for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis.

In patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion, the S2 alar iliac (S2AI) screw trajectory is a safe and effective method of lumbopelvic fixation but can lead to implant prominence. Here we use 3D CT modeling to demonstrate the anatomic feasibility of the S1 alar iliac screw (S1AI) compared to the S2AI trajectory in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. This retrospective study used CT scans of 14 patients withspinal deformity to create 3D spinal reconstructions and model the insertional anatomy, max length, screw diameter, and potential for implant prominence between 28 S2AI and 28 S1AI screw trajectories. Patients had a mean age of 14.42 (range 8-21), coronal cobb angle of 85° (range 54-141), and pelvic obliquity of 28° (range 4-51). The maximum length and diameter of both screw trajectories were similar. S1AI screws were, on average, 6.3 ± 5mm less prominent than S2AI screws relative to the iliac crests. S2AI screws were feasible in all patients, while in two patients, posterior elements of the lumbar spine would interfere with S1AI screw insertion. In this cohort of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, we demonstrate that the S1AI trajectory offers comparable screw length and diameter to an S2AI screw with less implant prominence. An S1AI screw, however, may not be feasible in some patients due to interference from the posterior elements of the lumbar spine.

Do Iliac Screws Placed Close to the Sciatic Notch Have Greater Pullout Strength?

Optimal iliac screw position in relation to the sciatic notch remains unknown. In 12 cadavers undergoing S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement, we tested the pullout strength of screws placed in proximity to the sciatic notch (≤5 mm) vs farther away from the sciatic notch (>5 mm). A biomechanical, cadaver-based study was performed on 12 cadavers undergoing bilateral S2AI screw insertion. The position of the S2AI screw regarding the sciatic notch was dichotomized as ≤5 mm from the sciatic notch on the right side and >5 mm on the left side, confirmed using c-arm fluoroscopy. The primary outcome was the pullout strength of the screw (N). Secondary outcomes were stiffness (N/mm), yield force (N), and work to failure (N mm). Ischial tuberosity was embedded into polymethyl methacrylate and secured to a custom 3-axis vise grip mounted to a 14.5-kN load cell. Pullout testing was performed at 5 mm/min. Force and displacement data were collected at 100 Hz and evaluated using MATLAB. The Mann-Whitney test was performed. Of 24 S2AI screws, 3 screws could not be tested because of cement-bone interface failure. A positive though nonsignificant trend of screw pullout strength was found for screws close to the notch compared with those farther from the notch (861.8 ± 340.7 vs 778.7 ± 350.8 N, P = .859). Similarly, screws close to the notch demonstrated a higher trend of stiffness (149.4 ± 145.4 vs 111.34 ± 128.2 N/mm, P = .320) and force to yield (806.9 ± 352.0 vs 618.6 ± 342.9 N, P = .455). Conversely, screws farther from the notch had a higher but similarly nonsignificant area under the force-displacement curve (10 867.0 ± 9565.0 vs 14 196.6 ± 9578.3 N mm, P = .455), which might be due to excess sheer/translation force that could not be reliably quantified. Although placing S2AI screws ≤5 mm of the sciatic notch provided stronger fixation in 3 of 4 biomechanical testing categories, these results were not statistically significant. Therefore, placing S2AI screws ≤5 mm of the sciatic notch did not provide stronger fixation.

Spinopelvic fixation failure in the adult spinal deformity population: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite modern fixation techniques, spinopelvic fixation failure (SPFF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery ranges from 4.5 to 38.0%, with approximately 50% requiring reoperation. Compared to other well-studied complications after ASD surgery, less is known about the incidence and predictors of SPFF. Given the high rates of SPFF and reoperation needed to treat it, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report the incidence and failure mechanisms of SPF after ASD surgery. The literature search was executed across four databases: Medline via PubMed and Ovid, SPORTDiscus via EBSCO, Cochrane Library via Wiley, and Scopus. Study inclusion criteria were patients undergoing ASD surgery with spinopelvic instrumentation, report rates of SPFF and type of failure mechanism, patients over 18years of age, minimum 1-year follow-up, and cohort or case-control studies. From each study, we collected general demographic information (age, gender, and body mass index), primary/revision, type of ASD, and mode of failure (screw loosening, rod breakage, pseudarthrosis, screw failure, SI joint pain, screw protrusion, set plug dislodgment, and sacral fracture) and recorded the overall rate of SPF as well as failure rate for each type. For the assessment of failure rate, we required a minimum of 12months follow-up with radiographic assessment. Of 206 studies queried, 14 met inclusion criteria comprising 3570 ASD patients who underwent ASD surgery with pelvic instrumentation (mean age 65.5 ± 3.6years). The mean SPFF rate was 22.1% (range 3-41%). Stratification for type of failure resulted in a mean SPFF rate of 23.3% for the pseudarthrosis group; 16.5% for the rod fracture group; 13.5% for the iliac screw loosening group; 7.3% for the SIJ pain group; 6.1% for the iliac screw group; 3.6% for the set plug dislodgement group; 1.1% for the sacral fracture group; and 1% for the iliac screw prominence group. The aggregate rate of SPFF after ASD surgery is 22.1%. The most common mechanisms of failure were pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, and iliac screw loosening. Studies of SPFF remain heterogeneous, and a consistent definition of what constitutes SPFF is needed. This study may enable surgeons to provide patient specific constructs with pelvic fixation constructs to minimize this risk of failure.

Utilizing robotic-assisted navigation for pelvic instrumentation in pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis: a technical note and case series.

Pelvic fixation is commonly used in correcting pelvic obliquity in pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis and in preserving stability in adult patients with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis or instances of traumatic or osteoporotic fracture. S2-alar-iliac screws are commonly used in this role and have been proposed to reduce implant prominence when compared to traditional pelvic fusion utilizing iliac screws. The aim of this technical note is to describe a technique for robotically navigated placement of S2-alar-iliac screws in pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, which (a) minimizes the significant exposure needed to identify a bony start point, (b) aids in instrumenting the irregular anatomy often found in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, and (c) allows for greater precision than traditional open or fluoroscopic techniques. We present five cases that underwent posterior spinal fusion to the pelvis with this technique that demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Preoperative Robotics Planning Facilitates Complex Construct Design in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery-A Preliminary Experience.

(1) Background: The correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) can require long, complex constructs with multiple rods which traverse important biomechanical levels to achieve multi-pelvic fixation. Minimally invasive (MIS) placement of these constructs has historically been difficult. Advanced technologies such as spinal robotics platforms can facilitate the design and placement of these constructs and further enable these surgical approaches in MIS deformity surgery. (2) Methods: A retrospective study was performed on a series of ASD patients undergoing MIS deformity correction with ≥eight fusion levels to the lower thoracic spine with preoperative robotic construct planning and robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. (3) Results: There were 12 patients (10 female, mean age 68.6 years) with a diagnosis of either degenerative scoliosis (8 patients) or sagittal imbalance (4 patients). All underwent preoperative robotic planning to assist in MIS robot-assisted percutaneous or transfascial placement of pedicle and iliac screws with multiple-rod constructs. Mean operative values per patient were 9.9 levels instrumented (range 8-11), 3.9 interbody cages (range 2-6), 3.3 iliac fixation points (range 2-4), 3.3 rods (range 2-4), 18.7 screws (range 13-24), estimated blood loss 254 cc (range 150-350 cc), and operative time 347 min (range 242-442 min). All patients showed improvement in radiographic sagittal, and, if applicable, coronal parameters. Mean length of stay was 5.8 days with no ICU admissions. Ten patients ambulated on POD 1 or 2. Of 224 screws placed minimally invasively, four breaches were identified on intraoperative CT and repositioned (three lateral, one medial) for a robot-assisted screw accuracy of 98.2%. (4) Conclusions: Minimally invasive long-segment fixation for adult spinal deformity surgery has historically been considered laborious and technically intensive. Preoperative robotics planning facilitates the design and placement of even complex multi-rod multi-pelvic fixation for MIS deformity surgery.

Surgical limits, pitfalls, and potential solutions in kyphectomy in myelomeningocele: three cases and systematic review of the literature.

To describe surgical treatment of 3 cases of severe and progressive thoracolumbar kyphosis in myelomeningocele and provide a systematic review of the available literature on the topic. Medical records and pre- and post-operative imaging of 3 patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis and myelomeningocele were reviewed. A database search was performed for all manuscripts published on kyphectomy and/or surgical treatment of kyphosis in myelomeningocele. Patients' information, preoperative kyphosis angle, type of surgery, levels of surgery degrees of correction after surgery and at follow-up, and complications were reviewed for the included studies. Three cases underwent posterior vertebral column resection (pVCR) of 2-4 segments at the apex of the kyphosis (kyphectomy). Long instrumentation was performed with all pedicle screws constructed from the thoracic spine to the pelvis using iliac screws. According to literature review, a total of 586 children were treated for vertebral kyphosis related to myelomeningocele. At least one vertebra was excised to gain some degree of correction of the deformity. Different types of instrumentation were used over time and none of them demonstrated to be superior over the other. Surgical treatment of progressive kyphosis in myelomeningocele has evolved over the years incorporating all major advances in spinal instrumentation techniques. Certainly, the best results in terms of preservation of correction after surgery and less revision rates were obtained with long construct and screws. However, complication rate remains high with skin problems being the most common complication. The use of low-profile instrumentation remains critical for treatment of these patients.

S2 alar-iliac screws are superior to traditional iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spinopelvic fixation (SPF) using traditional iliac screws has provided biomechanical advantages compared to previous constructs, but common complications include screw prominence and wound complications. The newer S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw may provide a lower profile option with lower rates of complications and revisions for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The purpose of this study was to compare rates of complications and revision following SPF between S2AI and traditional iliac screws in patients with ASD. A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review was conducted using Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed. Included studies reported primary data on adult patients undergoing S2AI screw fixation or traditional IS fixation for ASD. Primary outcomes of interest were rates of revision and complications, which included screw failure (fracture and loosening), symptomatic screw prominence, wound complications (dehiscence and infection), and L5-S1 pseudarthrosis. Fifteen retrospective studies with a total of 1502 patients (iliac screws: 889 [59.2%]; S2AI screws: 613 [40.8%]) were included. Pooled analysis indicated that iliac screws had significantly higher odds of revision (17.1% vs 9.1%, OR = 2.45 [1.25-4.77]), symptomatic screw prominence (9.9% vs 2.2%, OR = 6.26 [2.75-14.27]), and wound complications (20.1% vs 4.4%, OR = 5.94 [1.55-22.79]). S2AI screws also led to a larger preoperative to postoperative decrease in pain (SMD = -0.26, 95% CI = -0.50, -0.011). The findings from this review demonstrate higher rates of revision, symptomatic screw prominence, and wound complications with traditional iliac screws. Current data supports the use of S2AI screws specifically for ASD. CRD42022336515. III.

Pelvic Fixation Construct Trends in Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Although many techniques exist, spinopelvic fixation continues to present challenges in the management of adult spinal deformity. Shear forces, complex anatomy, and bone quality are common reasons why spine surgeons continue to explore options for fixation. A retrospective chart reviewed of patients receiving pelvic fixation for adult spinal deformity over a 12-year period was conducted. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts based on date of surgery: (1) 2010 to 2013, (2) 2014 to 2017, and (3) 2018 to 2021. Pelvic fixation constructs in the study included traditional iliac screws, stacked S2-alar-iliac (S2AI screws), and triangular titanium implants. Of the 494 patients with multiple implant constructs who met the inclusion criteria for this study, patients undergoing pelvic fixation surgery who received at least 2 implants increased by approximately 5% every 4years (90.2%, 94.6%, 99.1% respectively). Over the 12-year span, the implementation of the S2AI screw grew 120%. At our institution, there is a trend toward using multiple bilateral implant constructs for pelvic fixation, with nearly a tenfold percentage increase between the most recent cohorts. These include iliac screws with S2AI screws, multiple stacked S2AI screws, and S2AI screws used in conjunction with triangular titanium implants in hopes to decrease implant failure.

Incidence and Risk Factors of the Caudal Screw Loosening after Pelvic Fixation for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to assess the factors affecting caudal screw loosening after spinopelvic fixation for adult patients with spinal deformity. This meta-analysis calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using Review Manager ver. 5.3 (RevMan; Cochrane, London, UK). The loosening group was older than the control group (WMD, 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-3.87; p=0.01). The S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) could prevent the caudal screw from loosening (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94; p=0.03). However, gender distribution (p=0.36), the number of fusion segments (p=0.24), rod breakage (p=0.97), T-score (p=0.10), and proximal junctional kyphosis (p=0.75) demonstrated no difference. Preoperatively, only pelvic incidence (PI) in the loosening group was higher (WMD, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.71-7.45; p<0.01), while thoracic kyphosis (p=0.09), lumbar lordosis (LL) (p=0.69), pelvic tilt (PT) (p=0.31), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) (p=0.35), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p=0.27), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) demonstrated no difference (p=0.10). PI-LL (WMD, 6.05; 95% CI, 0.96-11.14; p=0.02), PT (WMD, 4.12; 95% CI, 0.99-7.26; p=0.01), TPA (WMD, 4.72; 95% CI, 2.35-7.09; p<0.01), and SVA (WMD, 13.35; 95% CI, 2.83-3.87; p=0.001) were higher in the screw loosening group immediately postoperatively. However, TK (p=0.24) and LL (p=0.44) demonstrated no difference. TPA (WMD, 8.38; 95% CI, 3.30-13.47; p<0.01), PT (WMD, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.47-10.55; p=0.01), and SVA (WMD, 23.13; 95% CI, 12.06-34.21; p<0.01) were higher in the screw loosening group at the final follow-up. However, PI-LL (p=0.17) demonstrated no significant difference. Elderly individuals were more susceptible to the caudal screw loosening, and the S2AI screw might better reduce the caudal screw loosening rate than the iliac screws. The lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment should be reconstructed properly to prevent the caudal screw from loosening. Measures to block sagittal alignment deterioration could also prevent the caudal screw from loosening.

Connecting the S2 alar-iliac screw head to the satellite rod for surgical correction of degenerative sagittal imbalance.

The S2AI screw technique has several advantages over the conventional iliac screw fixation technique. However, connecting the S2AI screw head to the main rod is difficult due to its medial entry point. We introduce a new technique for connecting the S2AI screw head to a satellite rod and compare it with the conventional method of connecting the S2AI screw to the main rod. Seventy-four patients who underwent S2AI fixation for degenerative sagittal imbalance and were followed up for ≥ 2years were included. All the patients underwent long fusion from T9 or T10 to the pelvis. The S2AI screw head was connected to the satellite rod (SS group) in 43 patients and the main rod (SM group) in 31 patients. In the SS group, the satellite rod was placed medial to the main rod and connected by the S2AI screw and domino connectors. In the SM group, the main rod was connected directly to the S2AI screw head and supported by accessory rods. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated in both groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, including proximal junctional failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, rod breakage, screw loosening, wound problems, and infection between the two groups. Furthermore, the correction power of sagittal deformity and clinical results in the SS group were comparable to those in the SM group. Connecting the S2AI screw to the satellite rod is a convenient method comparable to the conventional S2AI connection method in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes.

Iliac screws (is) vs. S2 alar iliac screws (S2AI) for pelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity patients. A propensity score-matched study

Iliac screws (is) vs. S2 alar iliac screws (S2AI) for pelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity patients. A propensity score-matched study

Sacropelvic Fixation for Adult Deformity Surgery Comparing Iliac Screw and Sacral 2 Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation: Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Two commonly used techniques for spinopelvic fixation in adult deformity surgery are iliac screw (IS) and sacral 2 alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixations. In this article, we systematically meta-analyzed the complications of sacropelvic fixation for adult deformity surgery comparing IS and S2AI. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched until March 29, 2023. The proportion of postoperative complications, including implant failure, revision, screw prominence, and wound complications after sacropelvic fixation, were pooled with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses for the method of sacropelvic fixation were conducted. Ten studies with a total of 1,931 patients (IS, 925 patients; S2AI, 1,006 patients) were included. The pooled proportion of implant failure was not statistically different between the IS and S2AI groups (21.9% and 18.9%, respectively) (p = 0.59). However, revision was higher in the IS group (21.0%) than that in the S2AI group (8.5%) (p = 0.02). Additionally, screw prominence was higher in the IS group (9.6%) than that in the S2AI group (0.0%) (p < 0.01), and wound complication was also higher in the IS group (31.7%) than that in the S2AI group (3.9%) (p < 0.01). IS and S2AI fixations showed that both techniques had similar outcomes in terms of implant failure. However, S2AI was revealed to have better outcomes than IS in terms of revision, screw prominence, and wound complications.

Biomechanical evaluation of multi-rod constructs to stabilize an S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element analysis.

To develop and validate a finite element (FE) model of a sacral pedicle subtraction osteotomy (S1-PSO) and to compare biomechanical properties of various multi-rod configurations to stabilize S1-PSOs. A previously validated FE spinopelvic model was used to develop a 30° PSO at the sacrum. Five multi-rod techniques spanning the S1-PSO were made using 4 iliac screws and a variety of primary rods (PR) and accessory rods (AR; lateral: Lat-AR or medial: Med-AR). All constructs, except one, utilized a horizontal rod (HR) connecting the iliac bolts to which PRs and Med-ARs were connected. Lat-ARs were connected to proximal iliac bolts. The simulation was performed in two steps with the acetabula fixed. For each model, PSO ROM and maximum stress on the PRs, ARs, and HRs were recorded and compared. The maximum stress on the L5-S1 disc and the PSO forces were captured and compared. Highest PSO ROMs were observed for 4-Rods (HR + 2 Med-AR). Constructs consisting of 5-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs + 1 Med-AR) and 6-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-AR + 2 Med-AR) had the lowest PSO ROM. The least stress on the primary rods was seen with 6-Rods, followed by 5-Rods and 4-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs). Lowest PSO forces and lowest L5-S1 disc stresses were observed for 4-Rod (Lat-AR), 5-Rod, and 6-Rod constructs, while 4-Rods (HR + Med-AR) had the highest. In this first FE analysis of an S1-PSO, the 4-Rod construct (HR + Med-AR) created the least rigid environment and highest PSO forces anteriorly. While 5- and 6-Rods created the stiffest constructs and lowest stresses on the primary rods, it also jeopardized load transfer to the anterior column, which may not be favorable for healing anteriorly. A balance between the construct's rigidity and anterior load sharing is essential.

Obturator inlet and iliac oblique technique for safe, convenient, and reliable iliac screw placement

BackgroundThere are many described techniques for the placement of posterior iliac screws for extension of lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation to the pelvis. However, each one has its limitations. We describe our technique for fluoroscopic guidance of iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet (OI) and iliac oblique (IO) views as well as a detailed review of how to obtain and interpret these views for safe iliac screw placement. MethodsRetrospective chart review of patients undergoing iliac screw placement utilizing the obturator inlet (OI) and iliac oblique (IO) views as part of spine instrumentation between January 2019 and March 2022. Screw length and bony breaches are reported utilizing this technique Results12 patients underwent posterior lumbopelvic fixation with a total of 23 screws placed via either open or percutaneous technique. The mean screw length was 96.5 mm (Range 80 - 110, standard dev 7.75). There were no recorded breaches or recannulation attempts. ConclusionsWe show how this technique is a much more convenient alternative to placement of iliac screws under the obturator outlet oblique (“teardrop” view) which necessitates that the C-arm be in line with instruments being placed. These described views can be used to place screws with either open or percutaneous techniques and with either the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) or S2 alar iliac (S2AI) starting points.

Feasibility analysis and nail planning ofS2 iliac crest screw placement in children

To evaluate the feasibility of S2 alar iliac screw insertion in Chinese children using computerized three-dimension reconstruction and simulated screw placement technique, and to optimize the measurement of screw parameters. A total of 83 pelvic CT data of children who underwent pelvic CT scan December 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, excluding fractures, deformities, and tumors. There were 44 boys and 39 girls, with an average age of (10.66±3.52) years, and were divided into 4 groups based on age (group A:5 to 7 years old;group B:8 to 10 years old;group C:11-13 years old;group D:14 to 16 years old). The original CT data obtained were imported into Mimics software, and the bony structure of the pelvis was reconstructed, and the maximum and minimum cranial angles of the screws were simulated in the three-dimensional view with the placement of 6.5 mm diameter S2 alar iliac screws. Subsequently, the coronal angle, sagittal angle, transverse angle, total length of the screw, length of the screw in the sacrum, width of the iliac, and distance of the entry point from the skin were measured in 3-Matic software at the maximum and minimum head tilt angles, respectively. The differences among the screw parameters of S2 alar iliac screws in children of different ages and the differences between gender and side were compared and analyzed. In all 83 children, 6.5 mm diameter S2 iliac screws could be placed. There was no significant difference between the side of each screw placement parameter. The 5 to 7 years old children had a significantly smaller screw coronal angle than other age groups, but in the screw sagittal angle, the difference was more mixed. The 5 to 7 years old children could obtain a larger angle at the maximum head tilt angle of the screw, but at the minimum cranial angle, the larger angle was obtained in the age group of 11 to 13 years old. There were no significant differences among the age groups. The coronal angle and sagittal angle under maximum cephalic angle and minimum cranial angle of 5 to 7 years old male were (40.91±2.91)° and (51.85±3.75)° respectively, which were significantly greater than in female. The coronal angle under minimum cranial angle was significantly greater in girls aged 8-10 years old than in boys. For the remaining screw placement angle parameters, there were no significant differences between gender. The differences in the minimum iliac width, the screw length, and the length of the sacral screws showed an increasing trend with age in all age groups. The distance from the screw entry point to the skin in boys were significantly smaller than that of girls. The minimum width of the iliac in boys at 14 to 16 years of age were significantly wider than that in girls at the same stage. In contrast, in girls aged 5 to 7 years and 11 to 13 years, the screw length was significantly longer than that of boys at the same stage. The pelvis of children aged 5 to 16 years can safely accommodate the placement of 6.5 mm diameter S2 alar iliac screws, but the bony structures of the pelvis are developing and growing in children, precise assessment is needed to plan a reasonable screw trajectory and select the appropriate screw length.