Ileorectal Anastomosis Research Articles

Reasons for reduced reproduction after colectomy in women with ulcerative colitis

Objectives Colectomy and subsequent bowel reconstruction in women with ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with decreased fertility, this survey aims to investigate possible reasons for this. Material and methods Women with UC aged 18–44 years at colectomy 2000–2020 were identified and data were retrieved from the Swedish inflammatory bowel disease register (SWIBREG). Additional information was obtained using a study-specific questionnaire. Results The survey was completed by 214 (72.8%) out of 294 eligible women. Mean age at disease onset was 22.9 years (standard deviation 0.5). No reconstruction was made in 67 (31.3%) women, whereof 24 (35.8%) had a completion proctectomy. Reconstruction was performed with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in 66 (30.8%) women and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in 81 (37.9%). Included women had on average 1.67 children (95% confidence interval 1.53–1.81) at the end of follow-up. The desire to have children was negatively affected by disease onset (59.4%), colectomy (44.9%) and reconstruction (36.7%). Altogether, 39.4% estimated that they had fewer children and 9.5% restrained completely from having children because of the disease. Difficulties to conceive were reported by 36.5% including 18.9% who expressed that they could not conceive at all. Difficulties to conceive was more common after reconstruction with IPAA (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.54) than IRA (OR 2.57). Conclusions A majority of women with UC and colectomy expressed that the disease affected their desire to have children, more often limiting the number of children than completely refraining. For childless patients, difficulties to conceive was more common than voluntary childlessness.

Surgical treatment is the initial step in treating Ogilvie syndrome with a significantly dilated cecum

Acute colonic pseudo-blockage, also known as Ogilvie syndrome, is characterized by a significant dilatation of the colon due to a loss of function, without the presence of a mechanical obstruction that would impede the transit of intestinal contents. Treatment and diagnosis are challenging. It frequently occurs in patients receiving various pharmacological treatments, hospitalized or living in a nursing home, suffering from a persistent critical illness, or having insufficient mobilization during the postoperative phase. Neostigmine is commonly used in medical treatment for this reason. Conservative treatment is tried for up to three days if the diameter of the cecum is less than 12 cm and there is no perforation-producing peritonitis. It has also been suggested that pyridostigmine and prucalopride therapies are useful. An expert endoscopist can conduct colonoscopic decompression on individuals who do not respond to medicinal treatment. Daily application of polyethylene glycol following treatment lowers the risk of recurrence, if resolution is possible. In contrast, surgical intervention is necessary in cases of colonic ischemia, perforation, or peritonitis. The results of the exploratory process are used to determine the stoma opening and resection width. This article describes a patient whose cecum measured sixteen centimeters, who underwent ileorectal anastomosis following subtotal colectomy, did not respond to decompression, and did not benefit from four days of medical care.

S3899 A Rare Case of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in Residual Rectum After Subtotal Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis

S3899 A Rare Case of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in Residual Rectum After Subtotal Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis

Fate of ileorectal anastomosis for treating Crohn's disease in the era of biologics: Results from a French retrospective multicentre cohort study.

The rate of surgical recurrence following ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains poorly understood. Most studies were conducted before the advent of biologics. Our aim was to assess the fate of IRA in patients with CD during the biologics era and identify risk factors for endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence. This retrospective multicentre cohort study included patients with CD who underwent IRA between 2006 and 2022. The association of patient characteristics and postoperative measures with each type of postoperative recurrence and need for a definitive stoma was investigated using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. During a median follow-up period of 60 months, the rates of endoscopic, clinical, and surgical postoperative recurrence were 70%, 59%, and 35%, respectively. The rate of perianal lesions was higher in patients who underwent a definitive stoma (70% vs. 35%, p = 0.007) and with endoscopic (50% vs. 25%, p = 0.038), clinical (54% vs. 24%, p = 0.006), and surgical (63% vs. 34%, p = 0.015) recurrence. The incidence of residual microscopic disease at the rectal margin was higher in patients with endoscopic recurrence (p = 0.047). Biologics were identified as protective factors against the need for a definitive stoma (p = 0.044). IRA is a good treatment option for extensive colitis in patients with CD. However, its consideration should be weighed in the presence of perianal lesions, which have been shown to be a risk factor for delayed proctectomy.

Endoscopic Surveillance after (Procto)Colectomy with Gastrointestinal Reconstruction in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP)-Principles, Goals and Practical Aspects Based on 12 Years of Observation.

(1) Background: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary condition characterized by the development of numerous adenomas in the large intestine, often necessitating colectomy due to an elevated risk of colorectal cancer. Despite surgical intervention, adenomas frequently recur, underscoring the importance of ongoing surveillance. This study evaluates the outcomes of a 12-year endoscopic follow-up after colectomy and gastrointestinal reconstruction for FAP. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 FAP patients who underwent at least one postoperative endoscopic examination. Assessments of the pouch or rectum were performed every 12-18 months following ileorectal anastomosis and every 18-24 months after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Follow-up biopsies were assessed using the adopted Spigelman classification. (3) Results: Postoperative pathology revealed invasive colorectal cancer in three patients. Abdominoperineal resection was performed in two cases due to secondary invasive carcinoma, and one T1 tumor was radically removed with ESD. One patient underwent radical pouch excision following a nodal pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. Over a 12-year observation period, the mean Spigelman score increased by 2 points, and the proportion of patients with low-grade polypoid lesions decreased. The quantity or size of polyps increased in 24 patients, decreased in 8 patients, and remained stable in 9 patients. In four patients, granular, laterally spreading tumors were discovered in the rectal stump. (4) Conclusions: Regular endoscopic surveillance in FAP patients facilitates early identification of neoplastic and inflammatory changes. The downstaging potential highlights the effectiveness of early interventions. While the Spigelman classification assessed polyps well, it did not predict cancer occurrence. A notable number of patients had invasive cancer at the time of surgery, underscoring the importance of early surgical qualification, which is particularly crucial for identifying upstaging or secondary cancer.

Preservation of superior rectal artery in laparoscopic colectomy: The best choice for slow transit constipation?

Laparoscopic colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis may be beneficial for patients with slow transit constipation who do not respond to conservative treatment, particularly if the superior rectal artery (SRA) is preserved. Several important concerns have been addressed in this commentary. It is important to first go over the definition of surgical procedure as it is used in this text. Second, the current study lacked a control group that had SRA preservation. Thirdly, it would be best to use a prospective, randomized controlled study. Lastly, a description of the mesenteric defect's state following a laparoscopic colectomy is necessary.

Modified Rosi–Cahill technique after left extended colectomy for splenic flexure advanced tumors

Advanced splenic flexure tumors are uncommon and have a higher risk of relapse. To ensure that the resection includes the entire area of lymphatic drainage with a complete mesocolic excision (CME), a left extended colectomy is needed. In peritoneal carcinomatosis, there is often extensive involvement of the sigma and splenic flexure of the colon. In many instances, total colectomies are chosen for these patients, even when a significant portion of the colon could be preserved. The potential impact on quality of life after splenic flexure colon resection is discussed, as well as the importance of anatomical knowledge and expertise in performing this type of surgery. Overall, this work presents a modified technique that aims to improve the outcomes and quality of life for patients with splenic flexure colon cancer. Creating a tension-free anastomosis after extended left-sided colorectal resection is challenging. There is a negative impact on quality of life when an ileorectal anastomosis is created. The colorectal anastomosis performed after modified Rosi–Cahill or Deloyers’ technique allows reduced small bowel bacterial overgrowth, achieves better water and sodium absorption, and altogether permits improved stool consistency. There are potential advantages of the Rosi–Cahill technique over other popular options such as Deloyers’ procedure as there is no torsion of the ileocolic vessels and no mesenteric windows. A video was recorded showing a potential pitfall during Deloyers’ technique resulting in the creation of a mesenteric window. The proper rotation of the colon during the modified Rosi–Cahill procedure was also filmed. Overall, this work presents a modified technique for reconstruction after left extended colectomy that aims to improve the outcomes and quality of life for patients with splenic flexure colon cancer.

Development of Desmoid Tumors After Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Background & AimsDesmoid tumours (DT) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). DT development might be related to the type and approach of colectomy. We aimed to compare DT development after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) and proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). MethodsWe performed an international historical cohort study in FAP patients who underwent IRA or IPAA between 1961 and 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of abdominal DT (either mesenteric, retroperitoneal or abdominal wall). Patients with a DT diagnosis before or at colectomy were excluded. Time to DT was considered censored at an eventual secondary proctectomy after IRA. We used multivariable Cox regression modelling to adjust for potential confounders. ResultsWe analysed data from 852 patients: 514 after IRA and 338 after IPAA (median follow-up 21 and 16 years, respectively). DTs were diagnosed in 64 IRA patients (12%) and 66 IPAA patients (20%). The cumulative DT incidence at 5 and 10 years was 7.5% and 9.3% after open IRA and 4.7% and 10.9% after laparoscopic IRA. These estimates were 13.6% and 15.4% after open IPAA and 8.4% and 10.0% after laparoscopic IPAA. The post-operative risk was significantly higher after IPAA (p < 0.01) in multivariable analysis, while approach did not significantly influence the risk. ConclusionsThe risk of developing an abdominal DT was found to be significantly higher after IPAA than after IRA. Postoperative DT risk should be taken into account when choosing between IRA and IPAA in FAP.

Endoscopic management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after prophylactic colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy - systematic review of the literature.

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop early colorectal adenomas and if left untreated, progression to cancer is an inevitable event. Prophylactic surgery does not prevent further development of cancer in the rectal remnant, rectal cuff in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and even on the ileal mucosa of the pouch body. The aim of this review is to assess long-term rates of cancer and adenoma development in patients with FAP after prophylactic surgery and to summarise current recommendations for endoscopic management and surveillance of these patients. A systematic literature search of studies from January 1946 through to June 2023 was conducted using the PRISMA checklist. The electronic database PubMed was searched. Fifty-four papers involving 5010 patients were reviewed. Cancer rate in the rectal remnant was 8.8-16.7% in the western population and 37% in the eastern population. The cumulative risk of cancer 30 years after surgery was 24%. Mortality due to cancer in the rectal remnant is 1.1-11.1% with a 5-year survival rate of 55%. The adenoma rate after primary IPAA was 9.4-85% with a cumulative risk of 85% 20 years after surgery and a cumulative risk of 12% for advanced adenomas 10 years after surgery. Cumulative risk for adenomas after ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) was 85% after 5 and 100% after 10 years. Adenomas developed more frequently after stapled (33.9-57%) compared to hand-sewn (0-33%) anastomosis. We identified reports of 45 cancers in patients after IPAA of which 30 were in the pouch body and 15 in the rectal cuff or at the anastomosis. There was a significant incidence of cancer and adenomas in the rectal remnant and ileal pouch of FAP patients during the long-term follow-up. Regular endoscopic surveillance is recommended, not only in IRA patients, but also in pouch patients after proctocolectomy.

What is the rate of definitive stoma after subtotal colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease? A nationwide study of 1860 patients.

Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require subtotal colectomy (STC) with ileostomy. The recent literature reports a significant number of patients who do not undergo subsequent surgery and are resigned to living with a definitive stoma. The aim of this work was to analyse the rate of definitive stoma and the cumulative incidence of secondary reconstructive surgery after STC for IBD in a large national cohort study. A national retrospective study (2013-2021) was conducted on prospectively collected data from the French Medical Information System Database (PMSI). All patients undergoing STC in France were included. The association between definitive stoma and potential risk factors was studied using univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 1860 patients were included (age 45 ± 9 years; median follow-up 30 months). Of these, 77% (n = 1442) presented with ulcerative colitis. Mortality and morbidity at 90 days after STC were 5% (n = 100) and 47% (n = 868), respectively. Reconstructive surgery was identified in 1255 patients (67%) at a mean interval of 7 months from STC. Seveny-four per cent (n = 932) underwent a completion proctectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and 26% (n = 323) an ileorectal anastomosis. Six hundred and five (33%) patients with a definitive stoma had an abdominoperineal resection (n = 114; 19%) or did not have any further surgical procedure (n = 491; 81%). Independent risk factors for definitive stoma identified in multivariate analysis were older age, Crohn's disease, colorectal neoplasia, postoperative complication after STC, laparotomy and a low-volume hospital. We found that 33% of patients undergoing STC with ileostomy for IBD had definitive stoma. Modifiable risk factors for definitive stoma were laparotomy and a low-volume hospital.

Superior Rectal Artery Preservation in Laparoscopically Assisted Subtotal Colectomy and Ileorectal Anastomosis for Slow-Transit Constipation.

Our previous retrospective observational study demonstrated the safety of laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis and preservation of the superior rectal artery (SRA), without instances of leakage, in patients with slow-transit constipation (STC). Thus, we extended the enrollment period and enlarged the sample size to detect the differences in the postoperative complications and surgical and functional outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with and without SRA preservation. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients with STC who underwent laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy between 2016 and 2020. The diagnosis of STC was based on the colonic transit and anal functional tests and barium enema to exclude secondary causes. Patients were divided into group A, which underwent surgery with SRA preservation, and group B, which underwent ligation of the SRA during surgery. Outcome assessments for both groups included the incidence of anastomotic breakdown, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, and complications. Propensity score matching allocated 34 patients to groups A and B each. Postoperative bowel function, including time to first flatus, stool, and oral intake, recovered better in group A than in group B. Anastomotic leakage, a significant postoperative complication, was less frequent in patients with SRA preservation. In conclusion, preservation of the SRA in patients undergoing laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for STC is associated with favorable postoperative bowel function recovery and lower anastomotic leakage rates.

Ileorectal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: what do surgeons and patients need to know? A systematic literature review.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is currently the gold standard for restoration of gastrointestinal continuity after colectomy for ulcerative colitis in the UK. However, with further experience of the risks relating to IPAA, the use of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is being revisited. Decisions regarding restorative surgery after colectomy are individual to every patient's circumstances, and this paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the literature to guide a full discussion of the risks and benefits of IRA. A systematic literature review was conducted of papers published from 2000 onwards relating to IRA and ulcerative colitis, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The papers were reviewed by two independent surgeons for information it was felt that patients and surgeons would want to know about the operation (cancer risk, bowel function, sexual and urinary function, fecundity/fertility and postoperative complications). Seventeen papers were identified for inclusion as they reported original data on one or more of the categories identified for discussion. The median ten-year cancer risk after IRA was 2.8% and the median failure rate at ten years was 21%. IRA was generally found to have lower postoperative complication rates and better bowel function than IRA, with sexual function similar and fecundity not commented on in any paper. For some patients, IRA can offer restorative surgery in the short or long term, with acceptable cancer risk, failure rate and postoperative complications, while avoiding the higher risks associated with IPAA.

Robotic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.

The benefits of minimally invasive approaches in colorectal surgery have been well demonstrated. However, some hesitancy remains with regards to the utilization of the robotic platform for total colectomies, mostly due to the perceived need for multiple re-dockings in multiquadrant surgery. This video aims to demonstrate how the robotic platform can be efficiently utilized in multiquadrant surgery without the need for multiple re-dockings, as well as some tips on how to overcome the potential challenges that may be encountered during this procedure.

Perioperative outcomes of ileorectal anastomosis - an analysis of 823 patients.

Ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) following total abdominal colectomy (TAC) allows for resortation of bowel continuity but prior studies have reported rates of anastomotic leak (AL) to be as high as 23%. We aimed to report rates of AL and complications in a large cohort of patients undergoing IRA. We hypothesized that AL rates were lower than previously reported and that selective use of diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) is associated with decreased AL rates. Patients undergoing TAC or end-ileostomy reversal with IRA, with or without DLI, between 1980 and 2021 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and retrospectively analysed. Redo IRA cases were excluded. Short-term (30-day) surgical outcomes were collected using our database. AL was defined using a combination of imaging and, in the case of return to the operating room, intraoperative findings. Of 823 patients in the study cohort, DLI was performed in 27% and performed more frequently for constipation and inflammatory bowel disease. The overall AL rate was 3% (1% and 4% in those with and without DLI, respectively) and diversion was found to be protective against leak (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.94, p = 0.04). However, patients undergoing diversion had a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (51% vs. 36%, p < 0.001) including superficial wound infection, urinary tract infection, dehydration, blood transfusion and portomesenteric venous thrombosis (all p < 0.04). Our study represents the largest series of patients undergoing IRA reported to date and demonstrates an AL rate of 3%. While IRA appears to be a viable surgical option for diverse indications, our study underscores the importance of careful patient selection and thoughtful consideration of staging the anastomosis and temporary faecal diversion when necessary.

High but decreasing rates of reconstruction after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and evidence of a direct volume outcome relationship.

Total (procto)colectomy is indicated in 15%-20% of ulcerative colitis(UC) patients during their disease course. Reconstruction options to avoid a permanent ileostomy include an ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). This study aimed to investigate reconstruction rates using Australian-based population-level data, and factors influencing reconstruction. A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. Patients with UC who underwent total (procto)colectomy with a minimum of 1-year follow up were included. The main outcome was reconstruction with either IPAA or IRA. The influence of hospital and patient factors on reconstruction rates was assessed by Cox regression. Overall, 1047 patients underwent a (procto)colectomy for UC (mean age 45.9 years [SD ± 18.3], 640 [61.1%] male). The 5-year reconstruction rate was 55% (IPAA 89%). Advanced age, emergent colectomy, higher comorbidity burden, and geographical remoteness were significantly associated with lower reconstruction rates. A lower reconstruction rate was also observed in the most recent time-period (2014-2019) (aHR 0.68[95% CI 0.54-0.86]), and where index (procto)colectomy was performed in low-volume (<1 pouch/year) pouch hospitals (aHR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.82]). NSW Australia has the highest reported rate of reconstruction following UC (procto)colectomy globally. However, rates reduced in the most recent time-period. There was variation in reconstruction rates across centres, with primary and overall reconstruction rates proportionate to hospital pouch volume. Reconstruction rates were also lower for patients living outside major cities. To ensure equitable opportunities for reconstruction, patients being considered for IBD pouch surgery should be centralized to a limited number of specialist pouch centres.

Ileorectal intussusception compared to end-to-end ileorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic total colectomy in slow-transit constipation

BackgroundAlthough end-to-end ileorectal anastomosis (EEIRA) following total colectomy is the most effective surgical treatment for slow-transit constipation (STC), frequent diarrhea and urgent defecation is often not resolved for over 6 months after surgery. ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare defecating frequency, surgical complications, and quality of life after ileorectal intussusception anastomosis (IRIA) or EEIRA following laparoscopic total colectomy for treatment of STC. MethodsThis is a retrospectively collected and analyzed data set of 100 patients with consecutive STC treated by the same medical team at Tianjin Union Medical Center from August 2016 to July 2021. Out of 100, 70 cases underwent IRIA, and 30 cases underwent EEIRA. The incidence and mortality of postoperative complications, gastrointestinal quality of life score (GIQLI), and fecal incontinence quality of life score (FIQL) were assessed at a median 3-year postoperative follow-up. The frequency of defecation, use of antidiarrheal drugs, and Wexner constipation score were assessed at the 12-month follow-up. ResultsA total of 100 patients (83 women and 17 men) were enrolled; no patients died during the study. At the 12-month follow-up, 19 patients (19/30, 63,33%) in the EEIRA group defecated >10 times after surgery. At 7 days, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation, there were statistically significant reductions in defecation times in the IRIA compared to the EEIRA group (all P < 0.05). ANOVA showed that the number of defecations decreased significantly in the IRIA compared to the EEIRA group (P < 0.00). Follow-up at the a median of three years showed a significant difference in the prevalence of short-term (P = 0.03) and long-term complications (P = 0.01) between the IRIA and EEIRA groups. The IRIA group had significantly improved FIQL (P = 0.03) and GIQLI scores (P = 0.01) compared to the EEIRA group at the median 3-year postoperative follow-up. ConclusionsAfter a median of three years, IRIA results in a lower prevalence of surgical complications than EEIRA and significantly improves the quality of life for STC patients by reducing defecation frequency within 12 months postoperatively.

A retrospective cohort study on renal morbidity related to stoma type in inflammatory bowel disease patients following colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery.

Defunctioning loop ileostomy (DLI) is frequently used to decrease the consequences of anastomotic leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery but is controversial because of stoma-associated morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe stoma-associated morbidity in IPAA-DLI patients compared with terminal ileostomy patients. Patients treated with colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, between 2005 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Terminal stoma-related morbidity was measured until 12 months after colectomy, IPAA surgery, or conversion to ileorectal anastomosis, whichever occurred first. DLI-related morbidity was measured until 12 months after IPAA surgery or stoma closure, whichever occurred first. Laboratory data were reviewed up to 18 months after surgery since patients without complications were rarely subjected to blood sampling. Data on patient characteristics, renal function, surgical complications, and readmissions were collected retrospectively. Primary outcomes were DLI- and terminal ileostomy-related renal morbidity, whereas secondary outcomes focused on stoma-related complications. The study cohort consisted of 165 patients with terminal ileostomy after colectomy (median (interquartile range (IQR)): stoma time 30 (15-74) months) and 42 patients with IPAA-DLI (median (IQR): stoma time 4 (3-5) months). One case of anastomotic IPAA leakage was observed. IPAA-DLI patients more often required hospital care due to high-volume stoma output immediately after surgery (0-30 days, 29%) compared with terminal ileostomy patients (4%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in acute renal injury (p = 0.073) or chronic renal failure (p = 0.936) incidences between the groups. DLI closure was achieved in 95% of IPAA-DLI patients, with 5% suffering Clavien-Dindo complications > 2. IPAA-DLI patients exhibited higher incidence of short-term high-volume stoma output without higher rates of acute renal injury or chronic renal failure compared with terminal ileostomy patients in this small single-center retrospective study suggesting that the risk of renal morbidity in IPAA-DLI patients may have been overestimated.

P655 The ileorectal anastomosis after a total colectomy is a feasible and valid surgical alternative in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Abstract Background Colectomy is still necessary in some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The decision of the technique for the restoration of the bowel continuity depends on the characteristics of the patient and whether it is Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). The options for the reconstruction are proctectomy with an ileoanal reservoir or an ileorectal anastomosis (IRa). The aim of this study is to evaluate the need of a proctectomy with a definitive ileostomy after an ileorectal anastomosis, the associated risk factors and the need for advanced therapies. Methods This retrospective study includes patients with colectomy and IRa from the ENEIDA national registry. Medical treatment offered during the postoperative follow up and the need for a proctectomy and a definitive ileostomy were evaluated according to the type of IBD. Results Of the 394 patients who underwent an IR, 37% had UC and 63% CD with a medium age of 58 years (RIQ 48-68) and a median follow-up after the IR of 174 months (RIQ 70- 266). 17% of UC’s patients and 42% of CD’s patients had associated perianal disease (p&amp;lt;0.001). The cumulative probability for a definitive ileostomy in UC’s patients was 1%, 2%, and 6% at 5, 10 and 20 years respectively and 1%, 3%, and 11% at 5, 10 and 20 years respectively for the CD (p=0.035). Postoperative maintenance treatment with biologicals was left in 45% (44% UC and 47% CD; p=0.28). During follow-up, the probability of starting biological treatment was 8%, 17%, 35% at 2, 5 and 10 years in CD and 3%, 12%, 28% at 2, 5 and 10 years in UC (p=0.59). Conclusion The probability of requiring a definitive ileostomy/proctectomy after an IR is low, although is more frequent in patients with CD than with UC. Because of this low probability an IR is a valid alternative to the reservoir or even to the proctectomy with a definitive ileostomy in selected patients, keeping in mind one third of the patients would need advanced therapies.

P1094 Rectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease - a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate surgical outcome and survival in patients with rectal cancer (RC) with and without IBD. Methods The study was performed as a national population-based cohort study based on the Colorectal Cancer Data Base (CRCBaSe). All patients ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of stage I-III RC treated with curative intent during the period 1997-2021 were included, with preliminary data for 1997-2016 available. Overall and disease-free survival after surgery was compared between patients with and without a previous diagnosis of IBD. Adjusted flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate proportional and time-dependent hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Updated data until 2021 with addition of cause-specific survival and perioperative data will be made clear by the time of the ECCO congress. Results In all, 16,263 patients with RC were included in the study, 1997-2016, among whom 235 had IBD. Patients with IBD were significantly younger, had a higher CCI, and lower tumours at diagnosis of RC, compared with patients without IBD. Among IBD patients, 45 (19.2%) were previously operated with colectomy, and 14 of these were reconstructed with ileorectal anastomosis. Among IBD patients, pT4 tumours were more prevalent (8.9%) than in patients without IBD (5.1%). Clear resection margins were less common in patients with IBD (90.6%) versus patients without IBD (95.1%). From preliminary adjusted analyses allowing the relative mortality rate to vary over follow-up time, RC patients with IBD experienced worse progression-free survival during the second year after surgery, after which their progression-free survival was superior in comparison with IBD-free patients. Conclusion The prognosis in RC patients with and without IBD varied over time. RC patients with IBD had an inferior progression-free survival initially, followed by an improved prognosis for the majority of the follow-up time. Despite a higher rate of pT4 tumours, R1-resections and lower tumors among IBD patients, unadjusted overall survival did not differ significantly compared to non-IBD CRC patients.

The colon does not reach! A technical note with tricks to avoid colorectal anastomoses under tension.

We describe two options for colorectal anastomosis suitable in cases when the colon would reach the pelvis under tension. Deloyers procedure and the retro-ileal colorectal anastomosis are presented, focusing on practical tips and tricks to perform them. Insights on patients who underwent the procedures are provided to demonstrate the advantages and feasibility of the techniques. Each step of both techniques is detailed. Ten patients underwent Deloyers procedure and nine underwent retro-ileal anastomosis at our unit. A minimally invasive approach was attempted in 13 patients, of whom five required conversion to open surgery due to the technical complexity of the abdominal procedure. Colorectal anastomosis was successfully performed in all patients. There were no major intra-operative complications, although five patients had postoperative complications requiring further treatment. Both techniques are effective in patients at risk of receiving a colorectal anastomosis under tension, and a minimally invasive approach can be used. However, owing to the complexity of surgery in this group of patients, the perioperative morbidity is not negligible. Careful postoperative management is advisable, and patients should be informed of the risks. In expert hands, the outcomes are acceptable, avoiding an ileorectal anastomosis and its constraints.