Ileal Pouch Research Articles

Giant Inflammatory Polyposis of the Rectum as a Complication of Ulcerative Colitis

Inflammatory bowel disease is an emerging gastrointestinal disease in Malaysia. One of its rare complications includes giant inflammatory polyposis (GIP). A 39-year-old woman presented with worsening per rectal mucous discharge, associated with blood, colicky abdominal pain, and weight loss. A series of endoscopies at another hospital did not provide an inconclusive diagnosis. Another repeat colonoscopy showed a left-sided colitis with marked erythema and friability with islands of polyps; this was concluded to be an ulcerative colitis based on histopathology; thus, medical treatment was commenced. However, 2 months later, the patient presented with constipation, which required laxatives, as well as a worsened lower abdominal pain. Subsequent colonoscopy revealed obstruction-caused GIP at the mid rectum extending to the lower rectum, which was confirmed by imaging modalities. She was diagnosed with obstructing GIP coupled with ulcerative colitis, and panproctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis were planned.

Classification of surgical causes of and approaches to the chronically failing ileoanal pouch

BackgroundAlthough there are various surgical causes of and therapeutic approaches to the chronically failing ileoanal pouch (PF), cases are often detailed without distinguishing the exact cause and corresponding treatment. The aim of our study was to classify causes of PF and corresponding surgical treatment options, and to establish efficacy of surgical approach per cause.MethodsThis retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients with chronic PF surgically treated at our tertiary hospital between July 2014 and March 2021. Patients were classified according to a proposed sub-classification for surgical related chronic PF. Results were reported accordingly.Results A total of 59 procedures were completed in 50 patients (64% male, median age 45 years [IQR 34.5–54.3]) for chronic PF. Most patients had refractory ulcerative colitis as indication for their restorative proctocolectomy (68%). All patients could be categorized according to the sub-classification. Reasons for chronic PF were septic complications (n = 25), pouch body complications (n = 12), outlet problems (n = 11), cuff problems (n = 8), retained rectum (n = 2), and inlet problems (n = 1). For these indications, 17 pouches were excised, 10 pouch reconstructions were performed, and 32 pouch revision procedures were performed. The various procedures had different complication rates. Technical success rates of redo surgery for the different causes varied from 0 to 100%, with a 75% success rate for septic causes.ConclusionsOur sub-classification for chronic PF and corresponding treatments is suitable for all included patients. Outcomes varied between causes and subsequent management. Chronic PF was predominantly caused by septic complications with redo surgery achieving a 75% technical success rate.

Ileal pouch after restorative coloproctectomy

The continuous development of pouch surgery has enabled continence-preserving treatment after coloproctectomy. The ileoanal J‑pouch is nowadays the standard reconstruction after restorative coloproctectomy with excellent functional long-term results. Taking the relative contraindications and a suitable patient selection into consideration, pouch placement can be indicated not only for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, but also for patients with nonfistular Crohn's disease. Due to a high treatment density with immunosuppressants, the surgical treatment regimen should be subdivided into amultistage procedure, whereby according to current data amodified two-stage procedure should be favored.

Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis in the White British and South Asian Populations in Selected Trusts in England 2001-2020: An Absence of Disparate Care and a Need for Specialist Centres.

Over the last decade, there has been extensive evidence that patients with inflammatory bowel disease from minority communities in the UK receive less than optimal care. In none of the studies has the role of surgery in the management of acute and severe ulcerative colitis been considered in any detail. A freedom of information (FOI) request was sent to 14 NHS Trusts in England, which serve significant South Asian populations. Details of the type of surgery patients from the South Asian and White British communities received between 2021 and 2020 were requested. Detailed responses were obtained from eight Trusts. Four hundred and ten White British patients underwent surgery for ulcerative colitis over this period at these eight Trusts, together with 67 South Asian patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution across the types of surgery undergone by the two communities overall (χ2 = 1.3, ns) and the proportions who underwent an ileo-anal anastomosis with pouch (z = −1.2, ns). However, within individual trusts, at the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, a significantly greater proportion of South Asian patients had an ileo-anal anastomosis with pouch compared to White British patients. At Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, all 72 patients who underwent surgery for ulcerative colitis were White British. This study has shown that, in general, for patients with a severe flare of ulcerative colitis where medical treatment has failed and surgery is warranted, the nature of the procedures offered is the same in the White British and South Asian communities. However, of concern is the number of units with low volume procedures. For most Trusts reported in this study, the overall number of Ileo-anal pouch anastomosis or anastomosis of ileum to anus procedures performed over a number of years was substantially below that required for a single surgeon to achieve competence. These findings reinforce the argument that inflammatory bowel disease surgery should be performed in a limited number of high-volume centres rather than across a wide range of hospitals so as to ensure procedures are carried out by surgeons with sufficient and on-going experience.

Cumulative incidence and risk factors for pouch adenomas associated with familial adenomatous polyposis following restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUNDThe emergence of restorative total proctocolectomy has significantly reduced the lifetime colorectal cancer risk associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). However, adenomas may develop in the ileal pouch over time and may even progress to carcinoma. We evaluated the cumulative incidence, time to development, and risk factors associated with ileal pouch adenoma.AIMTo evaluate the cumulative incidence, time to development, and risk factors associated with pouch adenoma.METHODSIn this retrospective, observational study conducted at a tertiary center, 95 patients with FAP who underwent restorative proctocolectomy at our center between 1989 and 2018 were consecutively included. The mean follow-up period was 88 mo.RESULTSPouch adenomas were found in 24 (25.3%) patients, with a median time of 52 mo to their first formation. Tubular adenomas were detected in most patients (95.9%). There were no high-grade dysplasia or malignancies. Of the 24 patients with pouch adenomas, 13 had all detected adenomas removed. Among the 13 patients who underwent complete adenoma removal, four (38.5%) developed recurrence. Among 11 (45.8%) patients with numerous polyps within the pouch, seven (63.6%) exhibited progression of pouch adenoma. The cumulative risks of pouch adenoma development at 5, 10, and 15 years after pouch surgery were 15.2%, 29.6%, and 44.1%, respectively. Severe colorectal polyposis (with more than 1000 polyps) was a significant risk factor for pouch adenoma development (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-5.96; P = 0.041).CONCLUSIONPouch adenomas occur at a fairly high rate in association with FAP after restorative proctocolectomy, and a high colorectal polyp count is associated with pouch adenoma development.

Prevalence of Clostridioides difficile Infection After Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Patients With Chronic Antibiotic-dependent Pouchitis and Crohn's-like Disease of the Pouch.

Recurrent or chronic antibiotic therapy is a therapeutic hallmark of chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis (CADP) or Crohn's-like disease of the pouch. Antibiotics alter the gut microbiome, which may increase the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CDI in patients with CADP and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with CADP or Crohn's-like disease of the pouch at a tertiary academic medical center. The primary outcome was prevalence of CDI. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic therapy at the time of CDI diagnosis, treatment regimens for CDI, and subsequent outcomes. Overall, 18 of 198 (9.1%) included patients developed CDI. Treatment with antibiotics at the time of CDI diagnosis occurred in 7 of 18 (39%) patients. Preoperative history of CDI was significantly associated with increased risk of developing CDI following ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) compared with those with no prior history of CDI (12 of 18 [67%] vs 11 of 180 [6%]; P < .001). In 16 of 18 (89%) patients, CDI treatment was initiated with predominantly oral vancomycin (72%) or metronidazole (17%). Although chronic inflammatory conditions of the pouch arise postoperatively, the prevalence of CDI in this population appears to be similar compared with the general population of patients with inflammatory bowel disease prior to and post IPAA. Preoperative CDI appears to be the greatest risk for postoperative CDI and may require extra vigilance in the assessment of CDI after IPAA.

Histopathology of Pouch and Para-Pouch Inflammatory and Neoplastic Disorders.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is used to treat patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who need colectomy. While this procedure substantially improves patient's quality of life and reduces cancer risk, it is associated with a variety of sequelae' including surgical complications, inflammatory disorders, and neoplasia. Pouchitis, cuffitis, and Crohn's disease of the pouch are the most common inflammatory disorders of the pouch and para-pouch. This study aimed to elaborate on the histopathology of common inflammatory and neoplastic disorders of the pouch and para-pouch. A Medline search for English language studies published between 1981 and 2021 using the PubMed search engine. The terms "ileal pouch-anal anastomosis," "pouchitis," "pouchitis activity score," "secondary pouchitis," "Crohn's disease of the pouch," "Crohn's-like conditions of the pouch," "pre-pouch ileitis," "cuffitis," "pouch adenocarcinoma," and "pouch neoplasia" were used. The published human studies that reported histopathology of common inflammatory and neoplastic disorders of the ileal pouch were selected and reviewed. Histologic examination plays an essential role in confirming inflammation in pouchitis, identifying etiology and clues for secondary pouchitis, and diagnosing neoplasia. A standardized, simple, and reproducible histologic grading system for pouchitis is needed. Pouch and para-pouch glandular dysplasia diagnosis is challenging and should always be reviewed by at least one gastrointestinal pathologist.

Controversies in Crohn's Disease Before and After Pouch Surgery.

IPAA is rarely performed in patients with a known diagnosis of Crohn's disease, although it may be done in highly selected patients with an absence of perianal disease or small bowel inflammation. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of Crohn's disease are, however, at increased risk of developing Crohn's disease of the pouch. Crohn's disease of the pouch can also occur in people with a preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis; however, it is unknown whether this phenotype is similar to classic Crohn's disease involving an intact bowel, or whether it is a distinct entity. This study aimed to describe Crohn's disease of the pouch, including luminal inflammation, and fibrostenotic and perforating phenotypes, as well as management of these conditions. Crohn's disease of the pouch can present in similar ways as classic Crohn's disease, classified as either inflammatory, fibrostenotic, or penetrating. Criteria involving the diagnosis of Crohn's disease of the pouch are stringent to prevent unnecessary treatments, because a diagnosis of Crohn's disease after IPAA for presumed ulcerative colitis can cause mental anguish. Treatment of Crohn's disease of the pouch depends on the presenting phenotype, although therapies are similar to classic Crohn's disease. Endoscopic, or even surgical treatment, may be required for fibrostenotic and fistulizing diseases. Crohn's disease of the pouch is a newly described disease of patients who undergo an ileoanal pouch anastomosis; and therefore, most of the evidence comes from retrospective trials in patients with an initial diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. While Crohn's disease of the pouch is controversial and perhaps a distinct disease within the spectrum of inflammatory bowel diseases, it nonetheless requires long-term medical therapy and close follow-up.

Image-Enhanced Endoscopy Surveillance of Colon and Pouch Dysplasia in IBD.

Patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis are at risk for developing colorectal cancer and need regular endoscopic surveillance to detect and remove precursor lesions. To do so, different technologies are available. The sources are observational and controlled studies, meta-analysis, and expert consensus articles available on PubMed. The selected materials include articles reporting outcomes of and recommendations on endoscopic surveillance and resection of dysplasia in the gastrointestinal tract, including the ileoanal pouch and the anal transition zone, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Incidence and detection rate of dysplasia and cancer with different endoscopic techniques in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Risk of cancer is proportional to the duration and extent of the disease, and surveillance interval should be tailored on the individual risk in a range of 1 to 5 years. High-definition imaging and virtual chromoendoscopy have improved the detection of dysplasia and are now comparable with conventional dye spray chromoendoscopy. After restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch, the risk of cancer is modest, but its high mortality warrants endoscopic surveillance. The evidence to guide pouch surveillance is limited, and recently, the first expert consensus provided a framework of recommendations, which include an initial assessment 1 year after surgery and follow-up depending on individual risk factors. The limitation includes scarcity of data on ileoanal pouch surveillance. Virtual chromoendoscopy and high-definition imaging have improved endoscopic surveillance, and more progress is expected with the implementation of artificial intelligence systems.

Robotic Surgery for the Ileal Pouch.

A robotic approach to total colectomy/proctectomy and ileal pouch reconstruction would seem to be a sensible use of the platform's enhanced reach, visualization, and dexterity. The study aimed to discuss current published data for robotic ileal pouch surgery. The study selection included a paucity of published data to date, representing early learning curves and case series with small numbers. Current robotic platforms may offer advantages, particularly in the low pelvis beyond what is found with a laparoscopic approach.

Systematic C-reactive protein monitoring reduces hospital stay after laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A comparative study of 158 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis.

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a common biomarker of inflammation which has largely been used to predict the risk of postoperative septic complications after colorectal surgery. However, no data exist concerning its potential benefit after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate a CRP-driven monitoring discharge strategy after laparoscopic IPAA for UC. Since 2012, 158 patients undergoing a laparoscopic IPAA for UC have been included: 66 patients (CRP group) operated since 2016 had a CRP-driven monitoring discharge on postoperative day 5 (POD 5) and were discharged on POD 6 if CRP < 100 mg/L; these patients were matched (according to age, gender, body mass index, IPAA in two or three steps) to 92 patients operated between 2012 and 2016 without any CRP monitoring (control group). Median length of hospital stay was shorter in the CRP than the control group (7 vs. 9 days; P < 0.001) and discharge on POD 6 occurred more frequently in the CRP group (47% vs. 7%, P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the two groups concerning overall morbidity (P=0.980), surgical site infection (P=0.554), Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa morbidity (P=0.523), unplanned rehospitalization (P=0.734) and 30-day reoperation (P=0.240). CRP-driven monitoring discharge strategy after laparoscopic IPAA for UC is associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay, without increasing morbidity, reoperation or rehospitalization rates.

Does an Ileoanal Anastomosis Decrease the Rate of Successful Pregnancy Compared With an Ileorectal Anastomosis? A National Study of 1491 Patients.

Report the rate of successful pregnancy in a national cohort of women with either an ileal pouch anal (IPAA) or ileorectal (IRA) anastomosis constructed after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or polyposis. Fertility after IPAA is probably impaired. All available data are corroborated by only small sample size studies. It is not known whether construction of IPAA versus IRA influences the odds of subsequently achieving a successful pregnancy, especially with increased utilization of the laparoscopic approach. All women (age: 12-45y) undergoing IRA or IPAA in France for polyposis or IBD, between 2010-2020, were included. A control population was defined as women aged from 12 to 45 years undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy during the same period. The odds of successful pregnancy were studied using an adjusted survival analysis. A total of 1491 women (IPAA=872, 58%; IRA=619, 42%) were included. A total of 220 deliveries (15%) occurred during the follow-up period of 71 months (39-100). After adjustment, the odds of successful pregnancy was not significantly associated with type of anastomosis (after IPAA: Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% confidence interval=0.56-1.11, P =0.17). The laparoscopic approach increased the odds of achieving successful pregnancy (HR=1.79, 95% confidence interval=1.20-2.63, P =0.004). IRA and IPAA significantly impacted fertility when compared with the control population ( P <0.001). In this large cohort study, total colectomy for polyposis or IBD was associated with reduced fertility compared with the general population. No difference in odds of achieving successful pregnancy was found between IRA and IPAA after adjustment. This analysis suggests laparoscopic surgery may be associated with greater likelihood of pregnancy.

The Surgical Management of Ileal Pouch Strictures.

Total proctocolectomy with IPAA reconstruction is the surgical approach of choice in ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and selected patients with Crohn's disease. Pouch stricture is a common complication after IPAA. This study aims to identify surgical management options for pouch stricture and offer a treatment algorithm. A computer-assisted search of the online bibliographic databases MEDLINE and Embase from 1990 to 2021 was performed. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, observational studies, and case reports were considered. Mechanical dilation, strictureplasty, stapler resection, pouch advancement, bypass, and repeat IPAA were included. Twenty-three articles were considered eligible. Overall incidence of strictures varied from 5% to 38%. Strictures were categorized into 3 areas: pouch inlet (with a reported incidence of 9% to 56%), mid-pouch (with a reported incidence of 2%), and pouch-anal anastomosis (with a reported incidence of 43% to 87%). Pouch-anal strictures were initially managed using bougie or Hegar dilation, with various surgical procedures advocated when initial dilation failed. Mid-pouch strictures are relatively unstudied with scant data. Pouch inlet strictures can be surgically managed by various transabdominal techniques' including resection and reconnection, strictureplasty, or bypass. Pouch-anal strictures should be managed in a step-up strategy as conservative procedures are associated with acceptable success rates. Initial mechanical dilation using bougie or Hegar dilation has a success rate of >80%, although it is likely to require repeat dilations. When these measures fail, transanal surgical approaches using strictureplasty, stapler resection' or pouch advancement should be offered. Transabdominal pouch revision should be offered to patients refractory to a transanal approach. In mid-pouch strictures, the treatment of choice is pouch revision and reanastomosis. Pouch inlet strictures can be managed by resection, strictureplasty, or bypass depending on the location and length of the stricture and surgeon experience. Studies were often small and retrospectively analyzed. There were no randomized controlled trials or comparison between different treatment options.

Management, Functional Outcomes, and Quality of Life After Development of Pelvic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Re-Do Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis

The data on management and outcomes of pelvic sepsis after re-do IPAA are scarce. The aim of this study is to report our management algorithm of pelvic sepsis in the setting of re-do IPAA and compare functional outcomes and quality of life after successful management of pelvic sepsis with a no sepsis control group. This is a retrospective cohort study. This investigation is based on a single academic practice group experience on re-do IPAA. Patients who underwent re-do IPAA for ileal pouch failure between September 2016 and September 2020 were included in the study. Management of pelvic sepsis was reported. Functional outcomes, restrictions, and quality-of-life scores were compared between the sepsis and no sepsis groups. One-hundred ten patients were included in our study, of whom 25 (22.7%) developed pelvic sepsis. Twenty-three patients presented with pelvic sepsis before ileostomy closure, and 2 patients presented with pelvic sepsis after ileostomy closure. There were 6 pouch failures in the study period due to pelvic sepsis. Our management was successful in 79% of the patients with median follow-up of 26 months. Treatments included interventional radiology abscess drainage (n = 7), IV antibiotics alone (n = 5), interventional radiology drainage and mushroom catheter placement (n = 1), mushroom catheter placement (n = 1), and endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (n = 1). Average number of bowel movements, urgency, incontinence, pad use, and seepage were comparable between the pelvic sepsis and no pelvic sepsis groups ( p > 0.05). Lifestyle alterations, Cleveland Global Quality of Life scores, and happiness with the results of the surgery were similar ( p > 0.05). This study is limited by its low study power and limited follow-up time. Pelvic sepsis is common after re-do IPAA, and management varies according to the location and size of the abscess/sinus. If detected early, our management strategy was associated with high pouch salvage rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B823 . ANTECEDENTES:Los datos sobre el tratamiento y los resultados de la sepsis pélvica después de reconfección de anastomosis anal, de la bolsa ileal son escasos.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio es informar nuestro algoritmo de manejo de la sepsis pélvica en el contexto de reconfección de anastomosis anal de la bolsa ileal y comparar los resultados funcionales y la calidad de vida después del manejo exitoso de la sepsis pélvica con un grupo de control sin sepsis.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Esta investigación se basa en una experiencia de un solo grupo de práctica académica sobre reconfección de IPAA.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes que se sometieron a una nueva anastomosis anal, del reservorio ileal por falla del reservorio ileal entre el 09/2016 y el 09/2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se informó el manejo de la sepsis pélvica. Los resultados funcionales, las restricciones y las puntuaciones de calidad de vida, se compararon entre los grupos con sepsis y sin sepsis.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 110 pacientes en nuestro estudio, de los cuales 25 (22,7) desarrollaron sepsis pélvica. Veintitrés pacientes presentaron sepsis pélvica antes del cierre de la ileostomía y 2 pacientes presentaron sepsis pélvica después del cierre de la ileostomía. Hubo 6 fallas de la bolsa en el período de estudio debido a sepsis pélvica. Nuestro manejo fue exitoso en el 79% de los pacientes con una mediana de seguimiento de 26 meses. Los tratamientos incluyeron drenaje de abscesos IR (n = 7), antibióticos intravenosos solos (n = 5), drenaje IR y colocación de catéter en forma de hongo (n = 1), colocación de catéter en forma de hongo (n = 1) y cierre endoluminal asistido por vacío (n = 1). El número promedio de evacuaciones intestinales, urgencia, incontinencia, uso de almohadillas y filtraciones fueron comparables entre los grupos con sepsis pélvica y sin sepsis pélvica ( p > 0,05). Las alteraciones del estilo de vida, las puntuaciones de la Calidad de vida global de Cleveland y la felicidad con los resultados de la cirugía fueron similares ( p > 0,05).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su bajo poder de estudio y su tiempo de seguimiento limitado.CONCLUSIONES:La sepsis pélvica es común después de la reconfección de anastomosis anal de la bolsa ileal y el manejo varía según la ubicación y el tamaño del absceso / seno. Si se detecta temprano, nuestra estrategia de manejo se asoció con altas tasas de recuperación de la bolsa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B823 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Construction in Obese Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

Obese patients are traditionally considered difficult pouch candidates because of the potential for intraoperative technical difficulty and increased postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of obese versus nonobese patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing an IPAA. This is a retrospectively, propensity score-matched, prospectively collected cohort study. This study was conducted at an IBD quaternary referral center. Patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing IPAA (1990-2018) were included. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 . The primary measures included 30-day complications, long-term anastomotic leak, and pouch failure rate (excision, permanent diversion, revision). Of 3300 patients, 631 (19.1%) were obese (median BMI = 32.4 kg/m 2 ). On univariate analysis, obese patients were more likely to be >50 years old (32.5% versus 22.7%, p < 0.001), ASA class 3 (41.7% versus 27.7%, p < 0.001), have diabetes (8.1% versus 3.3%, p < 0.001), and have had surgery in the biologic era (72.4% versus 66.2%, p = 0.003); they were less likely to have received preoperative steroids (31.2% versus 37.4%, p = 0.004). After a median follow-up of 7 years, 66.7% had completed at least 1 quality-of-life survey. Pouch survival in the matched sample was 99.2% (99.8% nonobese versus 95.4% obese, p = 0.002). After matching and controlling for confounding variables, worse clinical outcomes associated with obesity included global quality of life (relative risk, -0.71; p = 0.002) and long-term pouch failure (HR, 4.24; p = 0.007). Obesity was also independently associated with an additional 27 minutes of operating time ( p < 0.001). There was no association of obesity with the likelihood of developing a postoperative complication, length of stay, or pouch leak. Restorative ileoanal pouch surgery in obese patients with ulcerative colitis is associated with a relatively decreased quality of life and increased risk of long-term pouch failure compared with nonobese patients. Obese patients may benefit from focused counseling about these risks before undergoing restorative pouch surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B873 . ANTECEDENTES:Habitualmente se considera a los obesos como pacientes difíciles para la realización de un reservorio ileal, debido a su alta probabilidad de presentar dificultades técnicas intraoperatoria y aumento de las complicaciones posoperatorias.OBJETIVO:El propósito de este estudio fue comparar los resultados de pacientes con colitis ulcerosa obesos versus no obesos sometidos a un reservorio ileal y anastomosis anal (IPAA).DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte recopilado prospectivamente, retrospectivo, emparejado por puntajes de propensión.AJUSTE:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un centro de referencia de cuarto nivel para enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes con colitis ulcerosa sometidos a un reservorio ileal y anastomosis anal (1990-2018). Obesidad definida como un IMC ≥ 30 kg/m2.PRINCIPALES RESULTADO MEDIDOS:Los principales resultados medidos incluyeron complicaciones a los 30 días, fuga anastomótica a largo plazo y tasa de falla del reservorio ileal (escisión, derivación permanente, revisión).RESULTADOS:De 3.300 pacientes, 631 (19,1%) eran obesos (mediana de IMC = 32,4 kg/m2). En el análisis univariado, los pacientes obesos tenían más probabilidades de ser > 50 años (32,5% frente a 22,7%, p < 0,001), clase ASA 3 (41,7% frente a 27,7%, p < 0,001), tener diabetes (8,1% frente a 3,3%, p < 0,001), haberse sometido a cirugía en la era biológica (72,4% frente a 66,2%, p = 0,003), y tenían menos probabilidades de haber recibido esteroides preoperatorios (31,2% frente a 37,4%, p = 0,004). Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 7 años, el 66,7% había completado al menos una encuesta de calidad de vida. La supervivencia de la bolsa en la muestra emparejada fue del 99,2% (99,8% no obesos versus 95,4% obesos, p = 0,002). Después de emparejar y controlar las variables de confusión, los peores resultados clínicos asociados con la obesidad incluyeron la calidad de vida global (RR = -0,71, p = 0,002) y el fracaso de la bolsa a largo plazo (HR = 4,24, p = 0,007). La obesidad también se asoció de forma independiente con 27 minutos adicionales de tiempo quirúrgico ( p < 0,001). No hubo asociación de la obesidad con la probabilidad de desarrollar una complicación posoperatoria, la duración de la estadía o la fuga de la bolsa.CONCLUSIÓNES:La cirugía restauradora del reservorio ileoanal en pacientes obesos con colitis ulcerosa se asocia a una disminución relativa de la calidad de vida y un mayor riesgo de falla del reservorio a largo plazo en comparación con los pacientes no obesos. Los pacientes obesos pueden beneficiarse de un asesoramiento centrado en estos riesgos antes de someterse a una cirugía restauradoracon reservorio ileal y anastomosis anal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B873 . (Traducción-Dr. Rodrigo Azolas ).

A Case of Ulcerative Colitis with Anastomotic Recurrence after Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Early Stage Cancer of the Rectoanal Canal

A Case of Ulcerative Colitis with Anastomotic Recurrence after Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Early Stage Cancer of the Rectoanal Canal

Feasibility and Safety of Ambulatory Surgery as the Next Management Paradigm in Colorectal Resection Surgery.

Current clinical dogma favors universal inpatient admission after colorectal resection particularly in the presence of an anastomosis. We evaluate the feasibility and safety of ambulatory surgery in carefully selected patients undergoing colorectal resection/anastomosis. Between October 2020 and October 2021, all patients undergoing colorectal resection/anastomosis meeting specific criteria {no major comorbidity [American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) <4], not on therapeutic anticoagulation, compliant patient/family} were counseled preoperatively for ambulatory surgery (discharge <24h postsurgery). Complicated surgery (ileoanal pouch, enterocutaneous fistula repair, reoperative pelvic surgery, multiple resections) and/or ostomy creation (loop/end ileostomy, Hartmann's, abdominoperineal resection) were exclusions. Discharge was at 6 to 8 hours postoperatively if all predetermined factors (no ostomy teaching needed, ambulating comfortably, tolerating diet, stable vitals, and blood-work) were met and patients were willing, or was postponed to the next day at patient request. All discharged patients received phone checks the next day with the option also given for voluntary readmission if inpatient care was preferred by patient. Patients discharged <24 hours postop (AmbC) were compared to those staying on as inpatients admitted (InpC) and also to a comparable historical (October 2019-October 2020) group when ambulatory surgery was not offered (HistC). Of 184 abdominal colorectal surgery patients, 97 had complicated colorectal resection and/or ostomy. Of the remaining 87, 29 (33.3%) were discharged <24 hours postoperatively [7 (24%) patients at 8h]. Of these 29 AmbC patients, 4 were readmitted <30 days (ileus: 1, rectal bleeding: 2, nausea/vomiting: 1), 1 readmission was on first postdischarge day, none were voluntary post phone-check. AmbC and InpC (n=58) had similar age, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidity. InpC had greater estimated blood loss (109 vs 34mL, P <0.001) while length of stay was expectedly significantly longer (109 vs 17 hours, P <0.001). There was no mortality in either group. AmbC and InpC had similar readmission, reoperation, anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infection. Mean length of stay for HistC was 83 hours. AmbC and HistC had similar age, sex, race, body mass index, and ASA class. Complications including readmission, reoperation, anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infection were also similar for AmbC and HistC. With careful patient selection, preoperative education, perioperative management, and postoperative follow-up, ambulatory surgery is feasible in up to a third of patients undergoing colorectal resection/anastomosis and can be performed with comparable safety to the time-honored practice of routine inpatient hospitalization. Refinements in inclusion/exclusion criteria and postoperative outpatient follow-up will allow a paradigm shift in how such patients are managed, which has huge implications for patient experience, care-giver workload and health care finances.

Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis and Pouchitis: The Role of the Microbiota in the Pathogenesis and Therapy.

Inflammatory bowel diseases, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are life-long disorders characterized by the chronic relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract with the intermittent need for escalation treatment and, eventually, even surgery. The total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical intervention of choice in subjects affected by ulcerative colitis (UC). Although IPAA provides satisfactory functional outcomes, it can be susceptible to some complications, including pouchitis as the most common. Furthermore, 10–20% of the pouchitis may develop into chronic pouchitis. The etiology of pouchitis is mostly unclear. However, the efficacy of antibiotics in pouchitis suggests that the dysbiosis of the IPAA microbiota plays an important role in its pathogenesis. We aimed to review the role of the microbiota in the pathogenesis and as a target therapy in subjects who develop pouchitis after undergoing the surgical intervention of total proctocolectomy with IPAA reconstruction.

Endoscopic Management of Adenomas in the Ileal Pouch and the Rectal Remnant after Surgical Treatment in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), adenomas and even carcinomas may develop in the rectal remnant and the ileal pouch after surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of endoscopic management in patients with FAP. The main outcome measurements were the appearance of secondary cancer, complications, and the need for additional surgery. Thirty-four FAP patients with Kock’s continent ileostomy (Kock) (n = 3), ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) (n = 12), and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) (n = 19) were identified. The median follow-up period of endoscopic surveillance was 11.5 years for pouch patients (Kock + IPAA) and 21.7 years for IRA. Metachronous adenomas appeared in 32 patients (94.1%). In pouch patients, a total of 120 treatments were given to 20 patients, and 12 sessions of delayed bleeding (10%) occurred, which was significantly higher compared to IRA patients, with 0 sessions (p < 0.001). In IRA patients, a total of 169 treatments were given to 11 patients, with one case of perforation. No adenocarcinoma has developed since the start of endoscopic surveillance. Regular endoscopic surveillance and treatment are feasible and safe. However, in pouch patients, one must be cautious about delayed bleeding in the treatment of adenomas.

Colon polyps in children

Aim: to evaluate the results of bowel polyposis in children. Patients and methods: the retrospective study included children, aged 1 to 17 years. The clinic manifestations, diagnostics and treatment approach are described. Patients with adenomatous polyposis (n = 38) and juvenile polyposis (n = 16) are presented in details. Results: options for surgical procedure are described due to early and late results, morphological data and diagnostic findings (colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis and formation of seromuscular cylinder, n = 8; colproctectomy with ileal pouch, n = 10). Conclusions: the detection of colorectal polyps requires a wide range of diagnostic and treatment approaches depends on a clear understanding of the nosological form of polyposis, which allows to determine the optimal period and method of surgical treatment.