IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

SAKK 16/14: Anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (MEDI4736) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—A multicenter single-arm phase II trial.

TPS8584Background: Improving the outcome of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the major challenges in thoracic oncology. Based on previous trials from the Swiss Group fo...

Chemo-radiotherapy versus surgery-based treatment for Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Chemo-radiotherapy versus surgery-based treatment for Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Induction chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy for potentially resectable stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% to 90% of lung cancer cases. At diagnosis, around 30% of NSCLC patients are already at stage IIIA (N2). One standard treatment for this stage is induction chemotherapy followed by surgery, whether induction chemoradiotherapy is superior to induction chemotherapy remains uncertain. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized control trials to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of induction chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy for potentially resectable stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC. We systematically searched for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from the inception of each database to September 10, 2017. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR) rate of mediastinal lymph nodes, toxicity (grade 3-4 adverse events, i.e., nausea and vomiting, infections, leukopenia and anemia), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager v5.3. Four studies, containing 461 patients in total, were included for meta-analysis. Our analyses suggest that compared with induction chemotherapy, induction chemoradiotherapy improved ORR [odds ratio (OR) =1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.10, P<0.05] and pCR rate of mediastinal lymph nodes (OR =1.97, 95% CI: 1.00-3.86, P=0.05); but it did not significantly improve OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.91, 95% CI: 0.73-1.14, P=0.42] or PFS (HR =1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.26, P=0.91); also it did not exacerbate the toxicity. Induction chemoradiotherapy may have limited value concerning tumor response and pCR of mediastinal lymph nodes. However, current evidence does not support that addition of radiotherapy to induction chemotherapy followed by surgery can bring significant benefits to operable stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC patients. More studies are required to draw a better conclusion.

126TiP SAKK 16/14: Anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (MEDI4736) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multicenter single-arm phase II trial

126TiP SAKK 16/14: Anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (MEDI4736) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multicenter single-arm phase II trial

Favourable outcomes in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer operated on by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

The video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach has become a standard for the treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently published meta-analyses proved the benefit of VATS versus thoracotomy for overall survival (OS) and reduction of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes, long-term survival and rate of postoperative complications of the VATS approach versus thoracotomy. In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed 982 individuals who underwent surgical resection for Stage I-IIA NSCLC between 2007 and 2015. Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates, length of hospital stay, rate of complications and OS were assessed. Propensity score matching was performed to compare 2 groups of patients. Two hundred and twenty-five individuals from the thoracotomy group and 225 patients from the VATS group were matched regarding pTNM, sex, the Charlson comorbidity index, type of resection and histological diagnosis. In the propensity score-matched patient group, the VATS approach was associated with a significant benefit regarding OS (P = 0.042). Although no significant difference was observed (P = 0.14) in the 3-year survival rate of patients who had a thoracotomy versus VATS, the 5-year survival rate among patients with VATS increased significantly (61% vs 78%, P = 0.0081). The adjusted VATS-related hazard ratio for pTNM, sex and age was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.40-0.98). The VATS surgical approach also reduced both the rate of postoperative atelectasis (4% for VATS vs 10% for open thoracotomy; P = 0.0052) and the need for blood transfusions (4% vs 12% respectively, P = 0.0054) and significantly shortened the postoperative length of stay (mean 7.25 vs 9.34 days, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in the 30-day mortality (1% vs 1%, P = 0.66) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 1%, P = 0.48) rates were observed. Patients with early-stage NSCLC operated on with VATS had fewer complications, shorter postoperative length of stay and better OS compared to those who were operated on by thoracotomy.

CXCL14 and NOS1 expression in specimens from patients with stage I-IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer after curative resection.

Many studies show that CXC chemokine ligand 14 (CXCL14) is highly expressed in tumor-associated stromal cells, promoting tumor cell growth, and invasion. Because of its unclear receptors, CXCL14-initiated intracellular signal cascades remain largely unknown. However, CXCL14 can regulate nitric oxide synthase 1 (NOS1) as its intracellular molecular target. In this paper, we investigated the expression of CXCL14 and NOS1 in specimens from patients with stage I–IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after curative resection, and evaluated the prognostic significance of this gene expression in stromal fibroblasts and cancer cells.Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of CXCL14 and NOS1 in 106 formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC. The chi-square test was performed to examine the correlation of CXCL14 and NOS1 expression level with clinicopathological features. The effects of the expression of CXCL14 or NOS1 on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan–Meier and Cox hazard proportional model.The percentages of high CXCL14 expression in stromal fibroblasts and that in cancer cells were 46.2% (49/106) and 23.6% (25/106), respectively. The positive expression rates of NOS1 in cancer cells were 42.5% (45/106). The result indicated that there was a significant positive correlation between CXCL14 expression level in stromal fibroblasts and that in cancer cells (χ2 = 4.158, P = .041). In addition, the expression of CXCL14 in stromal fibroblasts was significantly correlated with NOS1 expression in cancer cells (χ2 = 16.156, P < .001). The 5-year PFS rates with low and high CXCL14 expression in stromal fibroblasts were 66.7% and 14.3% (χ2 = 44.008, P < .001), respectively, and the 5-year OS rates with those were 87.1% and 43.5% (χ2 = 21.531, P < .001), respectively. The 5-year PFS rates with negative and positive expression of NOS1 in cancer cells were 62.3% and 15.6% (χ2 = 33.756, P < .001), respectively, and the 5-year OS rates with those were 86.4% and 40.1% (χ2 = 24.430, P < 0.01), respectively.Both the high expression of CXCL14 in stromal fibroblasts and the positive expression of NOS1 in cancer cells are independent negative predictors of PFS and OS in patients with stage I–IIIA NSCLC after curative resection.

Induction Therapies Plus Surgery Versus Exclusive Radiochemotherapy in Stage IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

In spite of the growing body of data from prospective randomized clinical trials (PRCTs) and meta-analyses, the optimal treatment approach in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer remains unknown. This review focuses on the available data directly confronting induction chemotherapy or induction radiochemotherapy (RT-CHT) when followed by surgery with exclusive RT-CHT. Seven PRCTs and 4 meta-analyses investigated this issue. In addition, numerous retrospective studies attempted to identify potential predictors and/or prognosticators that may have influenced the decision to offer surgery in a particular patient subgroup. Several retrospective studies also evaluated exclusive RT-CHT in this setting. There is not a single piece of the highest level of evidence (PRCT or MA) showing any advantage of induction therapies followed by surgery over exclusive RT-CHT with the former treatment option leading to significantly more morbidity and mortality. Although several studies attempted to identify patient subgroups favoring induction therapies followed by surgery, they have invariably been retrospective in nature, and their results have never been reproduced even in other retrospective setting. Furthermore, no PRCT investigated potential pretreatment patient and/or tumor-related predictors of surgical multimodality success. Exclusive RT-CHT achieves similar results to induction therapies followed by surgery but with less morbidity and mortality. This is accompanied with the finding that no pretreatment predictor exists to enable identification of even a subgroup of stage IIIA/pN2 patients benefiting from any surgical approach.

Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy

BackgroundTo evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsTwo groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tumor motion less than 5 mm; group 2: six patients with tumor motion equal to or more than 5 mm) were re-planned with SPArc and RO-IMPT. Both plans were generated using robust optimization to achieve an optimal coverage with 99% of internal target volume (ITV) receiving 66 Gy (RBE) in 33 fractions. The dosimetric results and plan robustness were compared for both groups. The interplay effect was evaluated based on the ITV coverage by single-fraction 4D dynamic dose. Total delivery time was simulated based on a full gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 4 s. Statistical analysis was also evaluated via Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsBoth SPArc and RO-IMPT plans achieved similar robust target volume coverage for all patients, while SPArc significantly reduced the doses to critical structures as well as the interplay effect. Specifically, compared to RO-IMPT, SPArc reduced the average integral dose by 7.4% (p = 0.001), V20, and mean lung dose by an average of 3.2% (p = 0.001) and 1.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.001), the max dose to cord by 4.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.04), and the mean dose to heart and esophagus by 0.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.01) and 1.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.003) respectively. The average total estimated delivery time was 160.1 s, 213.8 s, 303.4 s, 840.8 s based on ELST of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, and 4 s for SPArc plans, compared with the respective values of 182.0 s (p = 0.001), 207.9 s (p = 0.22), 250.9 s (p = 0.001), 509.4 s (p = 0.001) for RO-IMPT plans. Hence, SPArc plans could be clinically feasible when using a shorter ELST.ConclusionsThis study has indicated that SPArc could further improve the dosimetric results in patients with locally advanced stage NSCLC and potentially be implemented into routine clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Shows No Survival Advantage to Chemotherapy Alone in Stage IIIA Patients

For operable patients with clinical stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, the optimum neoadjuvant treatment strategy remains unclear. Our aim was to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) alone. We queried the National Cancer Database to identify all patients with N2 and either T1-T2 non-small cell lung cancer who received either NCRT or NCT followed by lobectomy between 2006 and 2012. Patients with T3 tumors were excluded. A propensity match analysis was performed incorporating preoperative variables, and the incidence of postoperative complications, pathologic downstaging, and long-term survival were compared. In all, 1,936 patients met criteria, 745 NCT and 1,191 NCRT. The NCRT patients were younger, less likely to be treated at an academic medical center, and more likely to have adenocarcinoma. After propensity matching, patients in the NCT group showed lower 30-day mortality (1.3% versus 2.9%) and 90-day mortality (2.9% versus 6.0%), and were more likely to undergo a minimally invasive resection (25.7% versus 14.1%). The NCRT patients were more likely to have a pathologic complete response (14.2% versus 4.0%) and to be N0 at the time of resection (45.2% versus 38.7%). In the multivariable analysis, NCRT patients were at a greater risk of mortality than NCT patients (hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 1.36). In our cohort, combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy was associated with improved pathologic downstaging but showed increased perioperative mortality with no improvement in long-term overall survival. For stage IIIA patients with smaller tumors without local invasion, chemotherapy alone may be the preferred neoadjuvant treatment.

Before or After: Evolving Neoadjuvant Approaches to Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The treatment of patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most challenging and controversial areas of thoracic oncology. This heterogeneous group is characterized by varying tumor size and location, the potential for involvement of surrounding structures, and ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node spread. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered prior to definitive local therapy, has been found to improve survival in patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC. Concurrent chemoradiation has also been evaluated in phase III studies in efforts to improve control of locoregional disease. In certain instances, a tri-modality approach involving concurrent chemoradiation followed by surgery, may offer patients the best chance for cure. In this article, we provide an overview of the trials evaluating neoadjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC that have resulted in current practice strategies, and we highlight the areas of uncertainty in the management of this challenging disease. We also review the current ongoing research and future directions in the management of stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.

The dutch national clinical audit for lung cancer: A tool to improve clinical practice? An analysis of unforeseen ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement in the Dutch Lung Surgery Audit (DLSA)

ObjectiveOptimal treatment selection for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depends on the clinical stage of the disease. Particularly patients with mediastinal lymph node involvement (stage IIIA-N2) should be identified since they generally do not benefit from upfront surgery. Although the standardized preoperative use of PET-CT, EUS/EBUS and/or mediastinoscopy identifies most patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis, a proportion of these patients is only diagnosed after surgery. The objective of this study was to identify all patients with unforeseen N2 disease after surgical resection for NSCLC in a large nationwide database and to evaluate the preoperative clinical staging process. MethodsData was derived from the Dutch Lung Surgery Audit. Patients with pathological stage IIIA NSCLC after an anatomical resection between 2013 and 2015 were evaluated. Clinical and pathological TNM-stage were compared and an analysis was performed on the diagnostic work-up of patients with unforeseen N2 disease. ResultsFrom 3585 patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC between 2013 and 2015, a total of 527 patients with pathological stage IIIA NSCLC were included. Of all 527 patients, 254 patients were upstaged from a clinical N0 (n = 186) or N1 (n = 68) disease to a pathological N2 disease (7.1% unforeseen N2). In these 254 patients, 18 endoscopic ultrasounds, 62 endobronchial ultrasounds and 67 mediastinoscopies were performed preoperatively. ConclusionsIn real world clinical practice in The Netherlands, the percentage of unforeseen N2 disease in patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC is seven percent. To further reduce this percentage, optimization of the standardized preoperative workup is necessary.

Thoracoscopic lobectomy after induction therapy-a paradigm shift?

Video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches (or VATS) have gained significant momentum in the management of locally advanced NSCLC in the current era. Accrual of experiences and concurrent improvements in instrumentation and video technology have further enhanced its role in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, substantial controversy exists around the notion of mediastinal staging and restaging after induction therapy, the utility of induction chemotherapy versus chemoradiation for N2 disease, and subsequent role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy following induction therapy. This perspective will closely examine these issues in the context of existing guidelines and contemporary studies.

The application of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage ⅢA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods From March 2008 to October 2015, there were 92 cases of stage ⅢA NSCLC patients received 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent radical surgery for lung cancer 3-4 weeks late (observation group), and another group of 65 cases of stage ⅢA NSCLC patients (control group) underwent surgery for lung cancer without preoperative chemotherapy. The clinical data as well as early and meddle term surgical outcome of both groups were analyzed retrospectively. Results The neoadjuvant chemotherapy effective rate was 73.9% in the observation group. All surgeries for lung cancer patients were undertaken either with video-assisted thoracotomy or traditional thoracotomy. No operative mortality and the postoperative pathology findings were in accordance with NSCLC. The bleeding amount and operation time of two groups were similar; the resection rate of the observation group was greater than that of the control group. All patients were followed up at least 3 years, and the 2 years and 3 years survival rate of the observation group was slightly higher than that of the control group. Conclusions Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC can improve the resection rate and prolong the survival time, which is worthy of clinical application. Key words: Chemotherapy, adjuvant; Carcinoma, non-small-cell lung/TH

Predictors for the efficacy of Endostar combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.

Endostar (rh-endostatin) is a new recombinant human endostatin, which could inhibit cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth. To explore anti-angiogenesis short-term efficacy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and identify the potential predictive factors. We pathologically examined 26 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC who received NP chemotherapy alone or combined with Endostar, respectively. Our results indicated that total clinical benefit rate (CBR) 87.5% and 64% (p= 0.76), respectively. The clinical benefit (CB) patients in the treatment group showed significant changes in endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), blood flow (BF), permeability surface (PMS), and microvascular density (MVD) before and after treatment. Compared with CB patients in the control group, changes in EPC and MVD (only) before and after treatment were significant. The variation of EPC, PMS, and MVD before and after treatment in the treatment group showed positive correlation with tumor regression rate (TRR) and the variation of MVD, whereas those of EPC and PMS demonstrated positive correlations with variation of MVD before and after treatment. Our findings suggested that PMS and EPC may be used as a predictive factor for the short-term efficacy of the combined therapy in NSCLC.

Choice of postoperative radiation for stage IIIA pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer: impact of metastatic lymph node number

BackgroundPostoperative radiation (PORT) is an option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with resectable stage IIIA pathological N2 status (pN2). For patients with PORT, this study aims to investigate the impact of the exact number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) on overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS).MethodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 3373 patients with stage IIIA pathological N2 status (pN2) NSCLC who underwent a lobectomy or pneumonectomy from 2004 to 2013. OS and LCSS were compared among patients coded as receiving PORT or observation. The proportional hazards model was applied for investigation.ResultsOS and LCSS favored PORT for patients with stage IIIA (pN2) NSCLC. Multivariable analyses showed that PORT and the exact number of positive LNs (n ≤ 3) were independently associated with better OS and LCSS. Both better OS and LCSS emerged for positive LNs (n > 3) after the use of PORT in survival analyses, whereas the benefits of OS and LCSS were not observed anymore for positive LNs (n ≤ 3) group. More importantly, multivariable analyses showed that the use of PORT is an independent risk factor of survival for positive LNs (n > 3) but not for positive LNs (n ≤ 3).ConclusionsIn Stage IIIA (pN2) NSCLC, the use of PORT demonstrated better survival results than no PORT for patients with positive LNs (n > 3), but not for patients with positive LNs (n ≤ 3).

Phase I clinical trial of a novel autologous modified-DC vaccine in patients with resected NSCLC

BackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of a novel dendritic cell (DC) vaccine pulsed with survivin and MUC1, silenced with suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), and immune stimulated with flagellin for patients with stage I to IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase I open-label, uncontrolled, and dose-escalation trial. Moreover, we evaluate the potential efficacy of this modified DC vaccine as secondary aim.MethodsThe patients were treated with the vaccine at 1 × 106, 1 × 107and the maximum dose 8 × 107 at day 7, 14, and 21 after characterization of the vaccine phenotype by flow cytometry. The safety of the vaccine was assessed by adverse events, and the efficacy by the levels of several specific tumor markers and the patient quality of life.ResultsThe vaccine was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity even at higher doses. The most common adverse event reported was just grade 1 flu-like symptoms without unanticipated or serious adverse event. A significant decrease in CD3 + CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3+ T regulatory (Treg) cell number and increase in TNF-α and IL-6 were observed in two patients. Two patients showed 15% and 64% decrease in carcino-embryonic antigen and CYFRA21, respectively. The vaccination with the maximum dose significantly improved the patients’quality of life when administered at the highest dose. More importantly, in the long-term follow-up until February 17, 2017, 1 patient had no recurrence, 1 patients had a progressive disease (PD), and 1 patient was died in the low dose group. In the middle dose group, all 3 patients had no recurrence. In the high dose group, 1 patient was died, 1 patient had a PD, and the other 7 patients had no recurrence.ConclusionsWe provide preliminary data on the safety and efficacy profile of a novel vaccine against non-small cell lung cancer, which was reasonably well tolerated, induced modest antitumor activity without dose-limiting toxicity, and improved patients’ quality of life. Further more, the vaccine maybe a very efficacious treatment for patients with resected NSCLC to prevent recurrence. Our findings on the safety and efficacy of the vaccine in this phase I trial warrant future phase II/III clinical trial.

Recurrence dynamics after trimodality therapy (Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and surgery) in patients with stage IIIA (N2) lung cancer

IntroductionWe investigated the timing and patterns of recurrence after the treatment of stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer via neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Materials and methodsAn institutional database was reviewed retrospectively between 1997 and 2013 (N=570). Eligible patients had pathologically proven N2 disease, and they completed the planned trimodality therapy with curative intent. The hazard rate function and competing risk analysis were used to evaluate the recurrence dynamics. ResultsAmong the included patients, 76% had single station N2 involvement and 95% had complete resection. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 47% and 29%, respectively. Of the 290 patients who experienced recurrence, 25 (8.4%) experienced loco-regional recurrence, whereas 238 (80.4%) had distant metastases. The hazard rate function for overall recurrence revealed a peak at approximately 8 months after surgery and a marked decline after 2 years. The peak recurrence frequency of distant metastasis differed at each site, with isolated brain metastases exhibiting the earliest peak (6 months) and a narrow recurrence interval (15 months). A histological comparison revealed a higher recurrence hazard rate for adenocarcinoma than for squamous cell carcinoma but similar pattern of recurrences. Patients with complete responses had a lower cumulative incidence rate of recurrence but a slightly earlier peak of recurrence. Nodal responses to induction therapy demonstrated that patents with ypN0 had the lowest recurrence risk, whereas patients with ypN1 and ypN2 had similar hazard rates and cumulative incidence rates of recurrence. ConclusionsThe dynamics of recurrence after trimodality therapy is organ-specific and varies according to pathologic factors. Our finding provides information on selection patients with risk of recurrence and timing of surveillance study.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

The treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should control both local and microscopic systemic disease, because the 5-year survival of patients with Stage III NSCLC who underwent surgical resection alone has been dismal. One way to improve surgical outcome is the administration of chemotherapy before or after the surgical procedure. During the last two decades, many clinical studies have focused on developing optimal adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens that can be combined with surgical treatment and/or radiotherapy. Based on the results of those clinical studies, multimodality therapy is considered to be an appropriate treatment approach for Stage IIIA NSCLC patients; although, optimal treatment strategies are still evolving. When N2 nodal involvement is discovered postoperatively, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy confers an overall survival benefit. The addition of postoperative radiotherapy might be considered for patients with nodal metastases. Although definitive chemoradiation remains a standard of care for cN2 NSCLC, alternative approaches such as induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery can be considered for a selective group of patients. When surgical resection can be performed after induction therapy with low risk and a good chance of complete resection, the outcome may be optimal. The decision to proceed with resection after induction therapy must include a detailed preoperative pulmonary function evaluation as well as a critical intraoperative assessment of the feasibility of complete resection.

S-1 vs. paclitaxel plus carboplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected stage II/IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer.

The majority of patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require adjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival following surgery. In the present trial, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the feasibility and safety of S-1 as an adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer were evaluated. A total of 40 patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC were enrolled and randomized to receive postoperative chemotherapy with either up to 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (arm A) or with up to 1 year of S-1 (arm B). The primary endpoint was 2-year DFS. The secondary endpoints were feasibility and toxicity. A total of 40 patients were enrolled, but 3 were excluded in accordance with the exclusion criteria. The remaining 37 patients were analyzed. The 2-year DFS rate was 54.2% in arm A and 84.2% in arm B. Overall, 15/18 (83.3%) patients completed 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and 13/19 (68.4%) completed 1-year of S-1adjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 18 (16.7%) patients in arm A, 3 experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events, while none in arm B experienced such events. Therefore, S-1 chemotherapy for patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA NSCLC was a feasible and safe regimen, and it may therefore be considered as a potential adjuvant chemotherapy option for advanced NSCLC.

MS 17.02 MAGRIT

MS 17.02 MAGRIT