The combination of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease and immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) has been well documented in sporadic cases, but lacks overall assessment in large collections. Herein, we investigated the clinical and immunological characteristics and outcome of this entity. Seventy-five consecutive patients with biopsy-proven anti-GBM disease from March 2012 to March 2020 were screened. Among them, patients with concurrent IgAN were identified and enrolled. The control group included biopsied classical anti-GBM patients during the same period, excluding patients with IgAN, other glomerular diseases or tumors, or patients with unavailable blood samples and missing data. Serum IgG and IgA autoantibodies against GBM were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, as were circulating IgG subclasses against GBM. Fifteen patients with combined anti-GBM disease and IgAN were identified, accounting for 20% (15/75) of all patients. Among them, nine were male and six were female, with an average (± standard deviation) age of 46.7±17.3 years. Thirty patients with classical anti-GBM disease were enrolled as controls, with 10 males and 20 females at an average age of 45.4±15.3 years. Patients with combined anti-GBM disease and IgAN had restricted kidney involvement without pulmonary hemorrhage. Compared with classical patients, anti-GBM patients with IgAN presented with significantly lower levels of serum creatinine on diagnosis (6.2±2.9 vs 9.5±5.4mg/dL, P=.03) and less occurrence of oliguria/anuria (20%, 3/15 vs 57%, 17/30, P=.02), but more urine protein excretion [2.37 (1.48, 5.63) vs 1.11 (0.63, 3.90) g/24h, P=.01]. They showed better kidney outcome during follow-up (ESKD: 47%, 7/15 vs 80%, 24/30, P=.03). The autoantigen and epitope spectrum were comparable between the two groups, but the prevalence of circulating anti-α3(IV)NC1 IgG1 (67% vs 97%, P=.01) and IgG3 (67% vs 97%, P=.01) were lower in patients with IgAN. Concurrent IgAN was not rare in anti-GBM disease. Patients showed milder kidney lesions and better recovery after immunosuppressive therapies. This might be partly explained by lower prevalence of anti-GBM IgG1 and IgG3 in these patients.
Read full abstract