In recent years there has been an explosion of new scholarship in comparative civic education, which is reflected in this special issue of Research in Comparative and International Education (RCIE). The current scholars build on the early work of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, known as IEA. In 1975 IEA published the first crossnational study of civic education, which was based on a survey of students in nine countries (Torney et al., 1975). Almost 25 years passed before IEA again undertook a cross-national study in civic education (Torney-Purta et al., 2001; Torney-Purta et al., 1999). In the meantime, only a few researchers conducted studies that spanned multiple countries. The second IEA study, referred to as CivEd, was instrumental in bringing scholars from approximately 30 nations together on a regular basis over an eight-year period. The CivEd meetings not only produced an important study; they also stimulated cross-national conversations about research in education for citizenship and democracy. Further, as many countries and regional associations, such as the European Union, were experiencing increased interest in democratic civic education, scholars shared information about the existing research base within countries and regions. New organizations formed around comparative civic education research, such as CitizED and the Citizenship and Democracy Education (CANDE) special interest group of the Comparative and International Education Society. A growing number of individuals and teams of scholars presented new research at annual conferences of these organizations. Consequently, both the quality and quantity of research in comparative civic education has increased dramatically over the past decade. The editorial board of RCIE decided that it was time to feature this active subfield of comparative education in a special issue of the journal on comparative civic education research. Our goal was to illustrate the diversity of research methods employed and the varied types of questions explored by researchers. We sought to highlight work from a wide range of countries and regions and from both senior scholars and new scholars. In the past, other than the large-scale IEA studies, much of the research in civic education has been nation-specific, and published articles most often focused on civic education within a single country. In this issue, we sought research