Idiopathic Duct-centric Pancreatitis Research Articles

Pathophysiology of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a recently discovered form of pancreatitis and represents one of the diseases of the pancreas which can be cured and healed medically. International consensus diagnostic criteria have been developed, and the clinical phenotypes associated with the histopathologic patterns of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis should be referred to as type 1 and type 2 AIP, respectively. Most importantly, in type 1 AIP, the pancreatic manifestations are associated with other extrapancreatic disorders, resembling an immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease. In addition, the pancreas of a patient with AIP is often infiltrated by various types of immune cells; the cluster of differentiation (CD) 4 or CD8 T lymphocytes and IgG4-bearing plasma cells have been found in the pancreatic parenchyma and other involved organs in AIP and factors regulating T-cell function may influence the development of AIP. From a genetic point of view, it has also been reported that DRB1*0405 and DQB1*0401 mutations are significantly more frequent in patients with AIP when compared to those with chronic calcifying pancreatitis, and that only DQB1*0302 had a significant association with the relapse of AIP. Finally, it has been found that the polymorphic genes encoding cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, a key negative regulator of the T-cell immune response, are associated with AIP in a Chinese population. Even if these data are not concordant, it is possible that physiological IgG4 responses are induced by prolonged antigen exposure and controlled by type 2 helper T cells. We reviewed the current concepts regarding the pathophysiology of this intriguing disease, focusing on the importance of the humoral and cellular immune responses.

Autoimmunpankreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a relatively rare form of chronic pancreatitis which is characterized by a lymphoplasmatic infiltrate with a storiform fibrosis and often goes along with painless jaundice and discrete discomfort of the upper abdomen. Clinically we distinguish between two subtypes, which differ in terms of their histology, clinical picture and prognosis. Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis is the pancreatic manifestation of the IgG4-associated syndrome which also involves other organs. About one third of the patients can only be diagnosed after either histological prove or a successful steroid trail. Type 2 is IgG4-negative with the histological picture of an idiopathic duct centric pancreatitis and is to higher degree associated with inflammatory bowel disease. A definitive diagnosis can only be made using biopsy. Usually both forms show response to steroid treatment, but in type 1 up to 50 % of the patients might develop a relapse. The biggest challenge and most important differential diagnosis remains the discrimination of AIP from pancreatic cancer, because also AIP can cause mass of the pancreatic head, lymphadenopathy and ductal obstruction. This article summarizes recent advances on epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic strategy, therapy and differential diagnosis in this relatively unknown disease.

Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Similarities and Differences in Japan and Korea

Two subtypes (types 1 and 2) of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are currently recognized. Type 1 AIP is related to immunoglobulin G4 (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis), and type 2 AIP is characterized by neutrophilic infiltration into the epithelium of the pancreatic duct (idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis). Although type 2 AIP is sometimes observed in the United States and Europe, most cases of AIP in Japan and Korea are type 1. The international consensus diagnostic criteria for AIP were created to be applicable worldwide and to distinguish between the two types of AIP. AIP is diagnosed based on the presence of at least one of the five cardinal features (i.e., imaging, serology, other organ involvement, histology, and response to steroid therapy). Oral steroids are the standard therapy for AIP, but immunomodulatory drugs or rituximab have been successfully used for patients with relapsed AIP in the United States and Europe. Generally, the clinical manifestations and demography of AIP are similar between Japan and Korea. However, there are differences in some aspects of the disease, including the proportion of other organ involvement, the prevalence of type 2 AIP, diagnostic criteria and maintenance therapy between the two countries.

The Characteristics of Ulcerative Colitis Associated With Autoimmune Pancreatitis

To determine the prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) patients in a tertiary referral hospital and to compare the clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcomes of UC associated with AIP (AIP-UC) and UC patients. Recently, it was suggested that UC is associated with AIP. However, the prevalence of UC in AIP, together with the clinical characteristics and outcomes of AIP-UC are not clear. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of AIP patients diagnosed at the Asan Medical Center. Of the 104 patients with AIP, 6 (5.8%) were also diagnosed with UC. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG4 were elevated in 1 patient (16.7%), respectively, and 4 (66.7%) showed idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (type 2 AIP). Compared with 24 matched patients with UC only, AIP-UC patients had a lower body mass index (P=0.003), higher C-reactive protein levels (P=0.048), and higher Mayo scores (P=0.006) at diagnosis of UC. Two AIP-UC patients (33.3%), but none with UC only showed increased infiltration of IgG4-positive cells into the colonic tissues (P=0.006). During follow-up, 2 AIP-UC patients (33.3%) underwent colectomy and 1 (16.7%) died, but no colectomies or deaths occurred in the UC only group. AIP patients seem to have a higher risk of UC compared with the general population. The increased IgG4-positive cellular infiltration in the colonic tissue suggests that UC may be an extrapancreatic manifestation of AIP.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the differentiation of type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis

To investigate the usefulness of endoscopic ultra-sound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). We retrospectively reviewed 47 of 56 AIP patients who underwent EUS-FNA and met the Asian diagnostic criteria. On 47 EUS-FNA specimens, we evaluated the presence of adequate material and characteristic features of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) mentioned in the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria and examined if these findings make a contribution to the differential diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 AIP. A disposable 22-gauge needle was used for EUS-FNA. Adequate specimens including pancreatic tissue for differentiating AIP from cancer were obtained from 43 of 47 patients who underwent EUS-FNA. EUS-FNA was performed from the pancreatic head in 21 cases, which is known to be technically difficult when performed by core biopsy; there was no significant difference in the results compared with pancreatic body-tail. Nine of 47 patients met level 1 findings of LPSP and 5 patients met level 2 findings of LPSP. No one met level 1 findings of IDCP, but 3 patients met level 2 findings of IDCP. Of 10 seronegative cases, 2 cases were diagnosed with "definitive type 1 AIP", and 3 cases were diagnosed with "probable type 2 AIP" when considering both the level 2 histological findings and response to steroids. EUS-FNA is useful in the differentiation of type 1 and type 2 AIP, particularly in seronegative cases.

Differences between diffuse and focal autoimmune pancreatitis

To investigate differences in clinical features between diffuse- and focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Based on radiological findings by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, we divided 67 AIP patients into diffuse type (D type) and focal type (F type). We further divided F type into head type (H type) and body and/or tail type (B/T type) according to the location of enlargement. Finally, we classified the 67 AIP patients into three groups: D type, H type and B/T type. We compared the three types of AIP in terms of clinical, laboratory, radiological, functional and histological findings and clinical course. There were 34 patients with D-type, 19 with H-type and 14 with B/T-type AIP. Although obstructive jaundice was frequently detected in D-type patients (88%) and H-type patients (68%), no B/T-type patients showed jaundice as an initial symptom (P < 0.001). There were no differences in frequency of abdominal pain, but acute pancreatitis was associated more frequently in B/T-type patients (36%) than in D-type patients (3%) (P = 0.017). Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG)4 levels were significantly higher in D-type patients (median 309 mg/dL) than in B/T-type patients (133.5 mg/dL) (P = 0.042). Serum amylase levels in B/T-type patients (median: 114 IU/L) were significantly greater than in H-type patients (72 IU/L) (P = 0.049). Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) was histologically confirmed in 6 D-type, 7 H-type and 4 B/T-type patients; idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis was observed in no patients. Marked fibrosis and abundant infiltration of CD20-positive B lymphocytes with few IgG4-positive plasma cells were detected in 2 B/T-type patients. Steroid therapy was effective in all 50 patients (31 D type, 13 H type and 6 B/T type). Although AIP relapsed during tapering or after stopping steroids in 3 D-type and 3 H-type patients, no patients relapsed in B/T type. During follow-up, radiological features of 6 B/T-type patients were not changed and 1 B/T-type patient improved naturally. Clinical features of H-type AIP were similar to those of D-type, but B/T-type differed from D and H types. B/T-type may involve diseases other than LPSP.

Clinical Profile of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Its Histological Subtypes

The objective of this study was to clarify the clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and its subtypes (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis [LPSP] and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis [IDCP]) seen around the world. An international multicenter survey of AIP was conducted in 15 institutes from 8 countries. We compared clinical and pathologic profiles of AIP (n = 731) and the clinical profiles of LPSP (n = 204) and IDCP (n = 64) patients. Patients with LPSP were approximately 16 years older than IDCP patients. Obstructive jaundice was a more frequent presentation in LPSP versus IDCP (75% vs 47%, P < 0.001), whereas abdominal pain (41% vs 68%, P < 0.001) and acute pancreatitis (5% vs 34%, P < 0.001) were more frequent in IDCP patients. Patients with LPSP were more likely to have diffuse swelling of the pancreas (40% vs 25%, P = 0.037) and elevated serum IgG4 levels (63% vs 23%, P < 0.001) but less likely to be associated with ulcerative colitis (1% vs 16%, P < 0.001). Clinical profiles of non-histologically confirmed AIP from Asia, the United States, and United Kingdom corresponded with that of LPSP, whereas those from Italy and Germany suggested a mixture of LPSP and IDCP. Autoimmune pancreatitis is seen all around the world, with regional differences in the pathologic and clinical features. Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and IDCP have distinct clinical profiles.

Idiopathic Duct Centric Pancreatitis in Korea: A Clinicopathological Study of 14 Cases

Idiopathic Duct Centric Pancreatitis in Korea: A Clinicopathological Study of 14 Cases

Serum IgG4-negative autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is considered to be a pancreatic lesion of IgG4-related systemic disease, but about 20% of AIP patients do not have elevated serum IgG4 levels. This study aimed to clarify the pathophysiology of AIP patients without elevated serum IgG4 levels. Fifty-eight AIP patients were divided into 2 groups: those with elevated serum IgG4 levels (>135 mg/dl; SIgG4-positive AIP) and those without (SIgG4-negative AIP). The 2 groups' clinical, serological, radiological, and histological findings, as well as salivary and lacrimal gland function, were compared. Serum IgG4 levels were elevated in 45 AIP patients and normal in 13 patients. In SIgG4-negative AIP patients, the female ratio tended to be high; obstructive jaundice was less likely; abdominal pain and acute pancreatitis were more likely; segmental swelling of the pancreatic body and/or tail was more common; sclerosing extrapancreatic lesions, salivary and lacrimal gland dysfunction, and abundant infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells in the gastric mucosa were less likely; and conservative follow-up was sometimes implemented. Histological examination of the pancreas of SIgG4-negative AIP showed lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) rather confined to the pancreas (n = 4), inadequate material (n = 2), and pancreatic fibrosis showing infiltration of lymphocytes without infiltration of IgG4-positive cells or neutrophils (n = 2). Clinicopathological features of SIgG4-negative AIP differed from those of SIgG4-positive AIP. Some SIgG4-negative AIP cases are LPSP rather confined to the pancreas. SIgG4-negative AIP may include idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) or sclerosing pancreatitis other than LPSP or IDCP, but further studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Outcome of Patients With Type 1 or 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is better described than before, but there is still no international consensus for definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Our aims were to analyze the short- and long-term outcome of patients with focus on pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions, to search for predictive factors of relapse and pancreatic insufficiency, and to compare patients with type 1 and type 2 AIP. All consecutive patients followed up for AIP in our center between 1999 and 2008 were included. Two groups were defined: (a) patients with type 1 AIP meeting HISORt (Histology, Imaging, Serology, Other organ involvement, and Response to steroids) criteria; (b) patients with definitive/probable type 2 AIP including those with histologically confirmed idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis ("definitive") or suggestive imaging, normal serum IgG4, and response to steroids ("probable"). AIP-related events and pancreatic exocrine/endocrine insufficiency were looked for during follow-up. Predictive factors of relapse and pancreatic insufficiency were analyzed. A total of 44 patients (22 males), median age 37.5 (19-73) years, were included: 28 patients (64%) with type 1 AIP and 16 patients (36%) with type 2 AIP. First-line treatment consisted of steroids or pancreatic resection in 59 and 27% of the patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 41 (5-130) months. Steroids were effective in all treated patients. Relapse was observed in 12 patients (27%), after a median delay of 6 months (1-70). Four patients received azathioprine because of steroid resistance/dependence. High serum IgG4 level, pain at time of diagnosis, and other organ involvement were associated with relapse (P<0.05). At the end point, pancreatic atrophy was observed in 35% of patients. Exocrine and endocrine insufficiencies were present in 34 and 39% of the patients, respectively. At univariate analysis, no factor was associated with exocrine insufficiency, although female gender (P=0.04), increasing age (P=0.006), and type 1 AIP (P=0.001) were associated with the occurrence of diabetes. Steroid/azathioprine treatment did not prevent pancreatic insufficiency. Type 2 AIP was more frequently associated with inflammatory bowel disease than type 1 AIP (31 and 3%, respectively), but relapse rates were similar in both groups. Relapse occurs in 27% of AIP patients and is more frequent in patients with high serum IgG4 levels at the time of diagnosis. Pancreatic atrophy and functional insufficiency occur in more than one-third of the patients within 3 years of diagnosis. The outcome of patients with type 2 AIP, a condition often associated with inflammatory bowel disease, is not different from that of patients with type 1 AIP, except for diabetes.

Histopathologic and Clinical Subtypes of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been extensively reported from Japan, Europe, and the United States. Whereas the descriptions of AIP from Japan have predominantly been based on the presence of a distinct clinical phenotype, reports from Europe and the United States describe at least 2 histopathologic patterns in patients' condition currently diagnosed as AIP, viz, lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and idiopathic duct centric pancreatitis (IDCP) or granulocyte epithelial lesion (GEL)-positive pancreatitis. Although the 2 entities share common histopathologic features (periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and peculiar periductal fibrosis), expert pathologists can accurately distinguish them based on other unique histopathologic features. Clinically, the 2 entities have similar clinical presentation (obstructive jaundice/pancreatic mass and a dramatic response to steroids) but differ significantly in their demography, serological characteristics, other organ involvement, and disease relapse. While LPSP is associated with elevation in titers of nonspecific autoantibodies and serum IgG4 levels, IDCP does not have definitive serological autoimmune markers. All experts agreed that the clinical phenotypes associated with LPSP and IDCP should be nosologically distinguished; however, their terminology was debated. Whereas most experts agreed that the entities should be referred to as type 1 and type 2 AIP, respectively, others had concerns regarding use of the term "autoimmune" to describe IDCP.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: the clinicopathological characteristics of the subtype with granulocytic epithelial lesions

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been established as a distinct form of chronic pancreatitis that is distinguishable from other types such as alcoholic, hereditary or obstructive chronic pancreatitis. AIP seems to be a global disease, since it has been reported in many different countries, especially from Japan, USA and Europe (Germany, Italy, United Kingdom). Typical histopathological findings in the pancreas in AIP include a periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration with fibrosis, causing narrowing of the involved ducts. The typical clinical features include presentation with obstructive jaundice/pancreatic mass and a dramatic response to steroids. However, while the reports from Japan describe uniform changes called lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) in the pancreas from AIP patients, the reports from Europe and USA distinguish two histopathologic patterns in AIP patients: one with the characteristics of LPSP and another with slightly different histological features, called idiopathic duct centric pancreatitis (IDCP) or AIP with granulocytic epithelial lesions (GELs). This article reviews the evidence that GEL-positive AIP or IDCP is a second type of AIP, distinct from LPSP, in regard to pancreatic pathology, immunology and epidemiology.

Differences in Clinical Profile and Relapse Rate of Type 1 Versus Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been divided into subtypes 1 (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis) and 2 (idiopathic duct centric pancreatitis). We compared clinical profiles and long-term outcomes of types 1 and 2 AIP. We compared clinical presentation, relapse, and vital status of 78 patients with type 1 AIP who met the original HISORt criteria and 19 patients with histologically confirmed type 2 AIP. At presentation, patients with type 1 AIP were older than those with type 2 AIP (62 +/- 14 vs 48 +/- 19 years; P < .0001) and had a greater prevalence of increased serum levels of immunoglobulin G4 (47/59 [80%] vs 1/6 [17%]; P = .004). Patients with type 1 were more likely than those with type 2 to have proximal biliary, retroperitoneal, renal, or salivary disease (60% vs 0; P < .0001). Inflammatory bowel disease was associated with types 1 and 2 (6% vs 16%; P = .37). During median clinical follow-up periods of 42 and 29 months, respectively, 47% of patients with type 1 and none of those with type 2 experienced a relapse. In type 1 AIP, proximal biliary involvement (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; P = .038) and diffuse pancreatic swelling (HR, 2.00; P = .049) were predictive of relapse, whereas pancreaticoduodenectomy reduced the relapse rate (vs the corticosteroid-treated group; HR, 0.15; P = .0001). After median follow-up periods of 58 and 89 months (types 1 and 2, respectively), the 5-year survival rates for both groups were similar to those of the age- and sex-matched US population. Types 1 and 2 AIP have distinct clinical profiles. Patients with type 1 AIP have a high relapse rate, but patients with type 2 AIP do not experience relapse. AIP does not affect long-term survival.

Idiopathic Duct-Centric Pancreatitis (IDCP) with Immunological Studies

A 65-year-old woman with elevated serum levels of pancreatic enzymes was referred to our hospital for further examinations. Abdominal US and contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated swelling of the pancreas body and tail. MRCP and ERCP revealed abrupt ending of the MPD in the pancreas body. Under the suspicion of malignancy, distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were performed. The histopathological findings showed idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) with granulocytic epithelial lesions (GEL). As most cases of Japanese autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), the present case seems to be helpful to clarify the clinical findings of IDCP in Japan.

Idiopathic Duct-Centric Pancreatitis (IDCP)

Idiopathic Duct-Centric Pancreatitis (IDCP)

Can histopathology be the “Gold Standard” for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis?

Can histopathology be the “Gold Standard” for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis?