The history of the Great October socialist revolution is among one of the more actively investigated topics in Soviet historiography. For more than seventy years a large amount of documentary material has been unearthed, a huge literature has been created that practically redraws the canvas of revolutionary events. Nonetheless, we must admit that, seventy-four years later, we still do not have a genuinely scientific, truthful history of the revolution. There are many reasons for this, but chief among them is the restricting influence, in the words of L. D. Trotsky, of the Stalin school of falsification. The decades-long reign of Stalinist myths and legends that were foisted upon and created by historians, the dogmatic postulates and Procrustean ideological schema, had a pernicious effect on historical research into the October Revolution. Overcoming them is no easy matter, and it will require, judging from everything, a great deal of time and effort. Beginning in 1985, the restructuring of sociopolitical life in the Soviet Union, democratization, and glasnost created fundamentally new working conditions for Soviet historians. Above all, we have encountered an unprecedented explosion of popular interest in our country's history, particularly in the Soviet period. This interest is determined by practical social needs: to explain the historical roots of painful events, which gradually accumulated and led to the current crisis in Soviet society. So far as October 1917 is the point of reference in the modern history of the Soviet Union, to that extent it has become the object of the most intense attention of society. Moreover, it has moved to the center of a sharp ideological and political struggle that is sweeping the country. The October Revolution has ceased to be an event of the past; it has become a contemporary, vital event that has prompted a stream of questions, emotions, arguments and counter-arguments, and conjectures and inventions.
Read full abstract