Gourgouris, Stathis. 2013. Lessons in Criticism. New York: Fordham University Press. $65.00 hc. $24.00 sc. xxiv + 186 pp.The vexed intersections of religion, secularism, and literature have recently moved to the forefront of debates within critique. With Lessons in Stathis Gourgouris presents six essays that productively reshape these debates by tacking between the traditional formations of the and the religious. While many of these writings have appeared elsewhere in earlier forms, this volume significantly expands and revises them. Readers who have followed Gourgouris's debates about with Saba Mahmood or who want to see his engagement with versions of the from Charles Taylor or Talal Asad will be especially interested in this collection.Based on Gourgouris's 2012 Sydney Lectures in Philosophy and Society, the essays are inspired by Edward Said's 1983 collection World, the Text, and the Critic. Said opened with Secular Criticism and ended with a call to return critical discourse to the endeavor he imagined. Taking up this last task, Gourgouris not only challenges the metaphysical commitments he sees in traditional formations of and religion, but he also significantly expands the potential meaning of the term criticism, which remained elusive in Said's original presentation. For Gourgouris, is a that directly engages the problem of authority. It demands putting into question the means by which knowledge is presented as sovereign, unmarked by whatever social-historical institution actually possesses (xiv). That critical task relentlessly resists heteronomy, or the ascription of to an other or Other outside real human conditions and agency (xiv). For Gourgouris, is authorized by immanence and self-critique, not by transcendence or religion. He argues that his ultimate point is to take away from the religious the agency of determining what is (62). If has indeed unconsciously modeled itself in the image and likeness of religious concepts of authority, then can strip away the metaphysics of secularism (28), the set of principles that could posit themselves independent of historical reality (30). Against this temptation of transcendence, Gourgouris posits the finitude, groundlessness, and inherent incompleteness of criticism. thus resists the prime model of foundationalism, the external, ahistorical, heteronomous authorization that Gourgouris sees in divine power (50).Following Said, Gourgouris declares to be political. His essays consistently link theory with democratic politics (xvii), culminating in his final lecture, Responding to the Deregulation of the Political, which deftly covers radical movements ranging from the French Revolution to Occupy Wall Street. To frame these political interventions, Gourgouris nimbly draws from literary and theoretical antecedents. His first lecture, The Poiein of Criticism, challenges definitions of secular and criticism derived from critics like Talal Asad and instead delimits the ancient concept poiesis to a making, an immanent and human with the world (11). enduring flux and change of that encounter means that cannot be defined (12), that it exists not as theoria but as praxis, alert to contingencies and skeptical toward whatever pretends to escape the worldly (13).In his second and most critically effective essay, Detranscendentalizing the Secular, Gourgouris brings his conception of to bear on elements of Charles Taylor's work, challenging the idea of secularization as possessed of a telos or end goal. …
Read full abstract