Through analysis of recent Coetzee criticism and Krog's recent creative non‐fiction this review‐article invokes distinctions between ‘mimetic’ and ‘autotelic’ responses to text/context/reception interactions. If Coetzee is seen by his critics as autotelic (discourse deconstructed from within his work) Krog links imitations of the real to artistic and social commitment. Accordingly, Krog's interpretation of Petrus's story (the Petrus of Disgrace) differs from Lurie's interpretation. Despite this the conclusion is that among contemporary writers of South African interest Coetzee and Krog offer literary criticism its richest rewards. “J M Coetzee and his Doubles.” Conference, New York University (27–28 April 2007). Journal of Literary Studies 25(4), 2009. Guest Editors: Mark Sanders & Nancy Ruttenburg. 143pp. Mike Marais. 2009. Secretary of the Invisible: The Idea of Hospitality in the Fiction of J M Coetzee. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi. 249pp. Carrol Clarkson. 2009. J M Coetzee: Countervoices. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 230pp. Antjie Krog. 2009. Begging to be Black. Cape Town: Random House Struik. 291pp.